Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study

Dependability of Electrode to Modiolus Distance in Patients Specific Electrode Selection: A Cadaveric Model Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to discern the disparities in the electrode-to-modiolus distance (EMD) between cochleostomy and round window approaches when performed sequentially in the same temporal bone. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the cochlear metrics that contribute to these differences.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving the sequential insertion of a 12-electrode array through both round window and cochleostomy approaches in cadaveric temporal bones. Postimplantation high-resolution CT scans were employed to calculate various parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 12 temporal bones were included in the imaging analysis, revealing a mean cochlear duct length of 32.892 mm. The EMD demonstrated a gradual increase from electrode 1 (C1) in the apex (1.9 ± 0.07 mm; n = 24) to electrode 12 (C12) in the basal turn (4.6 ± 0.24 mm; n = 12; p < 0.01). Significantly higher EMD values were observed in the cochleostomy group. Correlation analysis indicated a strong positive correlation between EMD and cochlear perimeter (CP) (rs = 0.64; n = 12; p = 0.03) and a strong negative correlation with the depth of insertion (DOI) in both the middle and basal turns (rs = - 0.78; n = 20; p < 0.01). Additionally, EMD showed a strong negative correlation with the DOI-CP ratio (rs = -0.81; n = 12; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The cochleostomy group exhibited a significantly higher EMD compared with the round window group. The strong negative correlation between EMD and DOI-CP ratio suggests that in larger cochleae with shallower insertions, EMD is greater than in smaller cochleae with deeper insertions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Spread of the intracochlear electrical field: Implications for assessing electrode array location in cochlear implantation

The electrode-generated intracochlear electrical field (EF) spreads widely along the scala tympani surrounded by poorly-conducting tissue and it can be measured with monopolar transimpedance matrix (TIM_mp). Bipolar TIM (TIM_bp) allows estimations of local potential differences. With TIM_mp, the correct alignment of the electrode array can be assessed, and TIM_bp may be useful in more subtle evaluations of the electrode array's intracochlear location. In this temporal bone study, we investigated the effect of the cross-sectional scala area (SA) and the electrode-medial-wall distance (EMWD) on both TIM_mp and TIM_bp using three types of electrode arrays. Also, multiple linear regressions based on the TIM_mp and TIM_bp measurements were used to estimate the SA and EMWD. Six cadaver temporal bones were consecutively implanted with a lateral-wall electrode array (Slim Straight) and with two different precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays (Contour Advance and Slim Modiolar) for variation in EMWD. The bones were imaged with cone-beam computed tomography with simultaneous TIM_mp and TIM_bp measurements. The results from imaging and EF measurements were compared. SA increased from apical to basal direction (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). Intracochlear EF peak negatively correlated with SA (r = -0.55, p < 0.001) irrespective of the EMWD. The rate of the EF decay did not correlate with SA but it was faster in the proximity of the medial wall than in more lateral positions (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). For a linear comparison between the EF decaying proportionally to squared distance and anatomic dimensions, a square root of inverse TIM_bp was applied and found to be affected by both SA and EMWD (r = 0.44 and r = 0.49, p < 0.001 for both). A regression model confirmed that together TIM_mp and TIM_bp can be used to estimate both SA and EMWD (R² = 0.47 and R² = 0.44, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). In TIM_mp, EF peaks grow from basal to apical direction and EF decay is steeper in the proximity of the medial wall than in more lateral positions. Local potentials measured via TIM_bp correlate with both SA and EMWD. Altogether, TIM_mp and TIM_bp can be used to assess the intracochlear and intrascalar position of the electrode array, and they may reduce the need for intra- and postoperative imaging in the future.

Dynamic Behavior and Insertional Forces of a Precurved Electrode Using the Pull-Back Technique in a Fresh Microdissected Cochlea

HYPOTHESIS

This study evaluated the utility of the pull-back technique in improving perimodiolar positioning of a precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode array (EA) with simultaneous insertion force profile measurement and direct observation of dynamic EA behavior.

BACKGROUND

Precurved EAs with perimodiolar positioning have improved outcomes compared with straight EAs because of lowered charge requirements for stimulation and decreased spread of excitation. The safety and efficacy of the pull-back technique in further improving perimodiolar positioning and its associated force profile have not been adequately demonstrated.

METHODS

The bone overlying the scala vestibuli was removed in 15 fresh cadaveric temporal bones, leaving the scala tympani unviolated. Robotic insertions of EAs were performed with simultaneous force measurement and video recording. Force profiles were obtained during standard insertion, overinsertion, and pull-back. Postinsertion CT scans were obtained during each of the three conditions, enabling automatic segmentation and calculation of angular insertion depth, mean perimodiolar distance ( Mavg ), and cochlear duct length.

RESULTS

Overinsertion did not result in significantly higher peak forces than standard insertion (mean [SD], 0.18 [0.06] and 0.14 [0.08] N; p = 0.18). Six temporal bones (40%) demonstrated visibly improved perimodiolar positioning after the protocol, whereas none worsened. Mavg significantly improved after the pull-back technique compared with standard insertion (mean [SD], 0.34 [0.07] and 0.41 [0.10] mm; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The pull-back technique was not associated with significantly higher insertional forces compared with standard insertion. This technique was associated with significant improvement in perimodiolar positioning, both visually and quantitatively, independent of cochlear size.

Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels

BACKGROUND

The first surgeries with CI532 showed an effect of the proximity of the electrode to the modiolus on the Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs).

OBJECTIVES

Objectives of the study were to investigate the effect of the "pullback" procedure on intraoperative ECAP responses in three different electrode array positions and additionally to compare behavioral thresholds with the thresholds obtained in a group of patients using the standard insertion. The hypothesis of this study is that pullback will cause lower ECAPs and behavioral thresholds.

PATIENTS

The study included 40 patients, 20 in the pullback insertion group and 20 in the standard insertion group (without pullback).

METHOD

During insertion of the CI532 electrode array, ECAP was performed in three different positions for the pullback group: at initial insertion, at over-insertion, and after pullback. Insertion was monitored by fluoroscopy. In the standard group, ECAP was performed at the initial position, which is also the final position. ECAP thresholds (T-ECAPs) were compared within subjects at the initial and the final position in the pullback group and between groups in the final positions of the pullback and standard groups. Programming levels (C- and T-levels) were compared between the two groups 1 year after switch-on.

RESULTS

Intraoperative measurements pullback shows lower average T-ECAPs after pullback compared to thresholds in initial position. Comparison of intraoperative T-ECAPs at the final positions showed no statistically significant difference between the pullback group and the standard insertion group. Furthermore, 1 year after switch-on there was no statistically significant difference in C- and T-levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The pullback maneuver of the CI532 electrode array after an over-insertion gave significantly lower T-ECAPs compared to the thresholds at the initial position. However, the between-groups analysis of pullback and standard insertion showed neither significantly different T-ECAPs nor different programming levels. Because T-ECAPs and programming levels vary considerably between subjects, large groups are required to detect differences between groups. Additionally, the effect pullback technique to preserving the residual hearing is not known yet.

Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception

The slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.

Intraoperative transimpedance and spread of excitation profile correlations with a lateral-wall cochlear implant electrode array

A limiting factor of cochlear implant technology is the spread of electrode-generated intracochlear electrical field (EF) leading to spread of neural excitation (SOE). In this study, we investigated the relation of the spread of the intracochlear EF, assessed via transimpedance matrix (TIM), and SOE. A total of 43 consecutive patients (ages 0.7-82 years; 31.0 ± 25.7 years, mean ± SD) implanted with a Cochlear Nucleus CI522 or CI622 cochlear implant with Slim Straight electrode array (altogether 51 ears) were included in the study. Cochlear nerve was visualized for all patients in preoperative imaging and there were no cochlear anomalies in the study sample. The stimulated electrodes were in the basal, middle, and apical parts of the electrode array (electrode numbers 6, 11, and 19, respectively). The stimulation level was 210 CL on average for the TIM measurement and always 230 CL for the SOE measurement. Approximately 90% of the individual TIM and SOE profiles correlated with each other (p < .05; r = 0.61-0.99). Also, the widths of the TIM and SOE peaks, computed at 50% of the maximum height, exhibited a weak correlation (r = 0.39, p = .007). The 50% widths of TIM and SOE were the same only in the apical part of the electrode array; in the basal part SOE was wider than TIM, and in the middle part TIM was wider than SOE (p < .01 and p = .048, respectively). Within each measurement, TIM 50% widths were different between all three parts of the electrode array, while for SOE, only the basal electrode differed from the middle electrode. Finally, the size of the cochlea and the 50% widths of TIM and SOE had the strongest correlation in the middle part of the electrode array (r = -0.63, and -0.37, respectively). Our results suggest that there is a correlation between the spread of intracochlear EF and neural SOE at least in the apical part of the electrode array used in this study, and that larger cochleae are associated with more focused TIM and SOE.

[Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children]

OBJECTIVE

To study the dynamics of thresholds of the electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve (ECAP) during neural responce telemetry (NRT) intraoperatively, at the time of activation of the cochlear implantation system (CI) and after 3 and 6 months.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 50 children aged 1 year to 4 years with bilateral sensorineural deafness, operated on by Nucleus CI512 Profile + CP900 CI systems («Cochlear», Australia). In all patients, the electrode array was fully inserted. The dynamics and thresholds of ECAP were recorded and assessed in dynamics: when performing NRT intraoperatively, when the CI system was activated, and after 3 and 6 months. To assess the thresholds, the 1st, 6th, 11th, 16th and 22nd electrodes of the multichannel electrode array were selected.

RESULTS

The average threshold values and the NRT threshold profile determined intraoperatively and during measurements at different times after the activation of the CI system were significantly different (p<0.001), while the average postoperative results were characterized by relative stability. It was shown that the thresholds determined on the electrodes located in the middle of the electrode lattice are more stable than the thresholds determined on the apical and basal electrodes. In most patients, the NRT threshold values determined at the time of the activation of the CI system and after 3 and 6 months were significantly lower than the thresholds determined intraoperatively. The data obtained allow us to conclude that NRT is a stable and accurate technique that allows you to objectify the process of setting up an individual card for the stimulation of the speech processor at the rehabilitation stage after cochlear implantation.

Electrophysiological effects of slim straight intracochlear electrode position

OBJECTIVE

The electrical current distribution of a cochlear implant electrode within the cochlea is essential for post-operative hearing performance. The slim straight electrode is designed to enable the placement of contacts in a lateral or medial direction to the modiolus. The electrophysiological effect of this different contact direction is so far unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of intracochlear laterally or medially directed electrode contacts on electrophysiological behaviour.

METHOD

A slim straight electrode was inserted into the cochleae of five patients, and the neural response threshold was measured in a laterally and medially directed contact position. The cochleae in five temporal bone specimens were de-capped allowing an insertional observation of the contact position (lateral versus medial) of the electrode.

RESULTS

There was no difference in neural response threshold between a lateral and a medial position of the contacts. Temporal bone study indicated no intracochlear torsion of the electrode.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence that the intracochlear position of slim straight electrode contacts does not affect the neural response threshold.

Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode

A new slim modiolar electrode (CI532/632) has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than conventional electrodes. Better modiolar proximity has been proposed to yield better electrode discrimination capability and potentially better speech outcomes, necessitating its efficient measurement. Currently, intracochlear positional index (ICPI), the most reliable indicator for evaluating modiolar proximity, has been measured exclusively through ‘metal artifact-less’ cone beam CT. However, popular use of this index is precluded due to lack of cone beam CT in many institutions. Thus, eyes are now on elucidation of easy-to-measure indicators of modiolar proximity derived from conventional CT, which is accessible in all centers. We observed that enhanced tomographic resolution significantly reduces partial volume artifacts, providing better visualization of modiolus-electrode distance. Aided by ultra-high kernel specification with high-resolution index, we developed a novel and easy-to-measure, conventional CT-specific indicator, “modified ICPI”, for evaluation of modiolar proximity. Further, we showed that it closely correlates with the previously proposed parameter of modiolar proximity, the spiral diameter, measured from post-insertion radiograph, reiterating the value of X-ray-based spiral diameter. Through this study, we have taken a step toward the stage of immediate visual feedback regarding modiolar proximity and changes in insertion technique intraoperatively, ensuring optimal modiolar proximity.

Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have shown that cochlear duct length (CDL) varies among individuals and could significantly influence the final position of the electrode and its trajectory in the cochlea. Given this, we hypothesized that the degree of modiolar proximity of novel slim modiolar electrodes, such as CI532 and CI632, can also be affected by CDL. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively evaluated individual CDL to determine if there is any significant correlation of CDL with degree of modiolar proximity.

METHODS

Fifty-one ears from 38 subjects implanted with slim modiolar electrodes by a single surgeon through the round window approach using the pull-back technique were included. Our cohort was classified according to the deafness onset (congenital versus postlingual) and the degree of modiolar proximity (less versus tight) with reference to the spiral diameter made by the slim modiolar electrodes in situ on transorbital x ray. We then analyzed the CDL and its metrics using a readily available surgical preplanning tool (OTOPLAN) to obtain comparable data.

RESULTS

Among 30 ears associated with congenital deafness, 9 ears (30%) showed less modiolar proximity, while none of the 21 ears from 19 subjects with postlingual deafness exhibited "less modiolar proximity" based on our criteria. In this study, CDL showed significant variation among subjects. Importantly, a significant inverse correlation between spiral diameter and CDL (ρ = -0.581, p < 0.001) was found, showing that shorter CDLs have longer spiral diameter and less modiolar proximity. Moreover, further pull-back technique characterized by pulling out the electrode a little bit more in cases with shorter CDL, if not always, exhibited tighter modiolar proximity.

CONCLUSION

A preponderance of less modiolar proximity of the electrode was observed exclusively among congenital deafness cases, demonstrated by a less tight spiral configuration even under the pull-back technique. Our data suggest that shorter CDL is associated with a less tight spiral configuration of slim modiolar electrodes postoperatively. Depending on the insertion technique, the differential degree of modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes can be alleviated in cases with short CDL, which justifies cochlear duct length-based customized insertion of slim modiolar electrodes.

Challenging aspects of contemporary cochlear implant electrode array design

Objective

A design comparison of current perimodiolar and lateral wall electrode arrays of the cochlear implant (CI) is provided. The focus is on functional features such as acoustic frequency coverage and tonotopic mapping, battery consumption and dynamic range. A traumacity of their insertion is also evaluated.

Methods

Review of up-to-date literature.

Results

Perimodiolar electrode arrays are positioned in the basal turn of the cochlea near the modiolus. They are designed to initiate the action potential in the proximity to the neural soma located in spiral ganglion. On the other hand, lateral wall electrode arrays can be inserted deeper inside the cochlea, as they are located along the lateral wall and such insertion trajectory is less traumatic. This class of arrays targets primarily surviving neural peripheral processes. Due to their larger insertion depth, lateral wall arrays can deliver lower acoustic frequencies in manner better corresponding to cochlear tonotopicity. In fact, spiral ganglion sections containing auditory nerve fibres tuned to low acoustic frequencies are located deeper than 1 and half turn inside the cochlea. For this reason, a significant frequency mismatch might be occurring for apical electrodes in perimodiolar arrays, detrimental to speech perception. Tonal languages such as Mandarin might be therefore better treated with lateral wall arrays. On the other hand, closer proximity to target tissue results in lower psychophysical threshold levels for perimodiolar arrays. However, the maximal comfort level is also lower, paradoxically resulting in narrower dynamic range than that of lateral wall arrays. Battery consumption is comparable for both types of arrays.

Conclusions

Lateral wall arrays are less likely to cause trauma to cochlear structures. As the current trend in cochlear implantation is the maximal protection of residual acoustic hearing, the lateral wall arrays seem more suitable for hearing preservation CI surgeries. Future development could focus on combining the advantages of both types: perimodiolar location in the basal turn extended to lateral wall location for higher turn locations.

Cone-beam computed tomography in children with cochlear implants: The effect of electrode array position on ECAP

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in young children with cochlear implants (CIs) and study the effect of intracochlear position on electrophysiological and behavioral measurements.

METHODS

A total of 40 children with either unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants were prospectively included in the study. Electrode placement and insertion angles were studied in 55 Cochlear^® implants (16 straight arrays and 39 perimodiolar arrays), using either CBCT or X-ray imaging. CBCT or X-ray imaging were scheduled when the children were leaving the recovery room. We recorded intraoperative and postoperative neural response telemetry threshold (T-NRT) values, intraoperative and postoperative electrode impedance values, as well as behavioral T (threshold) and C (comfort) levels on electrodes 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20.

RESULTS

CBCT imaging was feasible without any sedation in 24 children (60%). Accidental scala vestibuli insertion was observed in 3 out of 24 implants as assessed by CBCT. The mean insertion angle was 339.7°±35.8°. The use of a perimodiolar array led to higher angles of insertion, lower postoperative T-NRT, as well as decreased behavioral T and C levels. We found no significant effect of either electrode array position or angle of insertion on electrophysiological data.

CONCLUSION

CBCT appears to be a reliable tool for anatomical assessment of young children with CIs. Intracochlear position had no significant effect on the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) threshold. Our CBCT protocol must be improved to increase the rate of successful investigations.

Relationship Between Electrode-to-Modiolus Distance and Current Levels for Adults With Cochlear Implants

HYPOTHESIS

Electrode-to-modiolus distance is correlated with clinically programmed stimulation levels.

BACKGROUND

Conventional wisdom has long supposed a significant relationship between cochlear implant (CI) stimulation levels and electrode-to-modiolus distance; however, to date, no such formal investigation has been completed. Thus, the purpose of this project was to investigate the relationship between stimulation levels and electrode-to-modiolus distance. A strong correlation between the two would suggest that stimulation levels might be used to estimate electrode-to-modiolus geometry.

METHODS

Electrode-to-modiolus distance was determined via CT imaging using validated CI position analysis software in 137 implanted ears from the three manufacturers holding FDA approval in the United States. Analysis included 2,365 total electrodes, with 1,472 from precurved arrays. Distances were compared to clinically programmed C/M levels that were converted to charge units.

RESULTS

Mean modiolar distance with perimodiolar and lateral wall electrodes was 0.47 and 1.15 mm, respectively. Mean suprathreshold charge values were significantly different between each manufacturer. When combining all data, we found a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.367, p < 0.01) that was driven both by the different charge values across companies, and that the company with the highest mean charge values only offers straight electrode arrays. When grouped by electrode type, however, we found a weak correlation (r = 0.12, p < 0.01) for perimodiolar array electrodes only. When considering a single array type from any one manufacturer, only one was observed where distance mildly predicted charge.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that electrode distance minimally contributes to the current level required for suprathreshold stimulation.

Constructing a three-dimensional electrical model of a living cochlear implant user's cochlea

BACKGROUND

Hearing performance varies greatly among users of cochlear implants. Current three-dimensional cochlear models that predict the electrical fields inside a stimulated cochlea and their effect on neural excitation are generally based on a generic human or guinea pig cochlear shape that does not take inter-user morphological variations into account. This precludes prediction of user-specific performance.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to develop a model of the implanted cochlea of a specific living human individual and to assess if the inclusion of morphological variations in cochlear models affects predicted outcomes significantly.

METHODS

Five three-dimensional electric volume conduction models of the implanted cochleae of individual living users were constructed from standard CT scan data. These models were embedded in head models that include monopolar return electrodes in accurate anatomic positions. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns were predicted for each of the models.

RESULTS

Modeled potential distributions and neural excitation profiles (threshold amplitudes, center frequencies, and bandwidths) are affected by user-specific cochlear morphology and electrode placement within the cochlea.

CONCLUSIONS

This work suggests that the use of user-specific models is indicated when more detailed analysis is required than what is available from generic models. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay

The integration of a shape memory actuator is a potential mechanism to achieve a consistent perimodiolar position after electrode insertion during cochlear implant surgery. After warming up, and therefore activation of the shape memory effect, the electrode array will change from a straight configuration into a spiral shaped one leading to a final position close to the modiolus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the integration of an additional thin wire (referred to as an "inlay") made of Nitinol, a well-established shape memory alloy, in a conventional hearing preservation electrode array will affect the insertion behaviour in terms of increased risk of insertion trauma. Six conventional Hybrid-L electrode arrays (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia) were modified to incorporate a wire inlay made of Nitinol. The diameter of the wires was 100 µm with a tapered tip region. Electrodes were inserted into human temporal bone specimens using a standard surgical approach. After insertion and embedding in epoxy resin, histological sections were prepared to evaluate insertion trauma. Insertion was straightforward and no difficulties were observed. The addition of a shape memory wire, thin but also strong enough to curl the electrode array, does not result in histologically detectable insertion trauma. Atraumatic insertion seems possible.

Modeling of Auditory Neuron Response Thresholds with Cochlear Implants

The quality of the prosthetic-neural interface is a critical point for cochlear implant efficiency. It depends not only on technical and anatomical factors such as electrode position into the cochlea (depth and scalar placement), electrode impedance, and distance between the electrode and the stimulated auditory neurons, but also on the number of functional auditory neurons. The efficiency of electrical stimulation can be assessed by the measurement of e-CAP in cochlear implant users. In the present study, we modeled the activation of auditory neurons in cochlear implant recipients (nucleus device). The electrical response, measured using auto-NRT (neural responses telemetry) algorithm, has been analyzed using multivariate regression with cubic splines in order to take into account the variations of insertion depth of electrodes amongst subjects as well as the other technical and anatomical factors listed above. NRT thresholds depend on the electrode squared impedance (β = -0.11 ± 0.02, P < 0.01), the scalar placement of the electrodes (β = -8.50 ± 1.97, P < 0.01), and the depth of insertion calculated as the characteristic frequency of auditory neurons (CNF). Distribution of NRT residues according to CNF could provide a proxy of auditory neurons functioning in implanted cochleas.

Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes

OBJECTIVE

The round window membrane (RWM) approach is designed to provide an atraumatic approach to scala tympani implantation with the goal of enhanced preservation of hearing and vestibular receptor function. Perimodiolar electrode designs offer advantages in electrophysiologic testing. However, perimodiolar arrays have only been investigated in insertion trials using temporal bone material. The aim of the present study was to evaluate perimodiolar electrode placement in a clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective nonrandomized study included 27 patients (October 2010 to February 2011). Due to the RWM approach, cochlear implantation electrode insertion was performed using a perimodiolar electrode array fitted with a stylet that enables movement through the first cochlear turn by withdrawing the stylet. We judged the feasibility of RWM approaches with perimodiolar electrodes and the electrode placement using flat panel detector radiography. Hearing preservation, vestibular receptor function (vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, subjective haptic vertical, and caloric irrigation), and subjective vertigo were evaluated in all RWM approaches.

RESULTS

For anatomic reasons, RWM insertions were possible in 21 cases (78%). The basilar membrane disruption rate was 19% in RWM insertions using perimodiolar electrodes. In those patients with the electrode position within the scala tympani, vestibular receptor functions and subjective vertigo remained unchanged. The residual hearing preservation was unsatisfactory. The mean pure-tone average loss was 21 dB.

CONCLUSION

We believe that if performed regularly, the RWM insertion technique has almost no negative effects on vestibular receptor function and produces no vertigo. However, cochlear hair cells may be more sensitive to electrode insertion traumas than vestibular receptor cells. The use of perimodiolar electrodes may require more atraumatic electrodes to achieve hearing preservation.

Advances to electrode pullback in cochlear implant surgery

Objective. To observe the intracochlear behavior of a cochlear implant electrode insertion technique (called “pullback”) in temporal bones. Study Design. Experimental. Settings. Tertiary referral center. Method. The change of the intracochlear electrode position was investigated under various conditions of an electrode pullback (N = 54) in 9 radiologically, size-estimated temporal bones (TBs). Those TBs were prepared by removal of the cochlear scalar roof to apply digital video capture procedures to monitor the pullback procedures. The digitally captured pictures were analyzed with specific software. Results. An optimal pullback of the electrode varied between 1.37 mm and 2.67 mm. While a limited pullback is without risk, an extended pullback bears the risk of removing the electrode tip out of its initial position or out of the cochlea. A correlation between cochlear size and the amount of pullback was not found. Conclusion. An initial insertion to the first or the second marker on the electrode followed by a limited pullback of about 1.37 mm to 1.5 mm can be recommended to achieve an optimized perimodiolar position. A pullback of up to two marker positions bears the risk of removing the electrode tip out of its initial position.

Clinical evaluation of cochlear implant sound coding taking into account conjectural masking functions, MP3000™

Efficacy of the SPEAK and ACE coding strategies was compared with that of a new strategy, MP3000™, by 37 European implant centers including 221 subjects. The SPEAK and ACE strategies are based on selection of 8–10 spectral components with the highest levels, while MP3000 is based on the selection of only 4–6 components, with the highest levels relative to an estimate of the spread of masking. The pulse rate per component was fixed. No significant difference was found for the speech scores and for coding preference between the SPEAK/ACE and MP3000 strategies. Battery life was 24% longer for the MP3000 strategy. With MP3000 the best results were found for a selection of six components. In addition, the best results were found for a masking function with a low-frequency slope of 50 dB/Bark and a high-frequency slope of 37 dB/Bark (50/37) as compared to the other combinations examined of 40/30 and 20/15 dB/Bark. The best results found for the steepest slopes do not seem to agree with current estimates of the spread of masking in electrical stimulation. Future research might reveal if performance with respect to SPEAK/ACE can be enhanced by increasing the number of channels in MP3000 beyond 4–6 and it should shed more light on the optimum steepness of the slopes of the masking functions applied in MP3000.

Audiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implantees

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The distance of the cochlear implant electrode contacts to the modiolus can be reduced by a surgical technique called "pull-back." This procedure changes the location of the fully inserted electrode array by moving the electrode out of the cochlea until the first silicon ring is visible in the cochleostomy. This leads to a more focused stimulation, which in turn could possibly improve hearing performance. The objective of the present study was to investigate the influence of the pull-back technique on frequency difference limens (FDL) and speech perception.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind trial.

METHODS

Twelve pull-back and 12 matched controls (matched by age, gender, duration of deafness, and duration of implant use) were used. Twenty-four patients were implanted with the Nucleus-24 Contour Advance array. In 12 patients the pull-back technique was used and in 12 matched controls a standard insertion technique was applied. Twelve months after the initial stimulation speech perception, spread of neuronal excitation (SOE) at electrodes 5, 10, and 15; and FDLs at 1, 2, and 4 kHz were measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference of speech perception performance between the two groups. However, the mean FDL for the 4 kHz reference tone was significantly lower in the pull-back group compared to the controls. The SOE was significantly reduced at basal, middle, and apical electrodes in the electrode pull-back group.

CONCLUSIONS

The pull-back technique seems to have its greatest effect on perimodiolar position in the basal regions of the cochlea. Therefore, it is most likely to observe improved FDL in the 4 kHz region. Current speech recognition tests do not reflect the lower FDL.

Neural response thresholds in the Nucleus Contour cochlear implant before and after stylet removal

CONCLUSION

The study shows that there are differences in the measurement of the action potentials with and without the stylet in the Nucleus Freedom Contour Advance that are higher in the apex than in the base of the cochlea.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if there are differences in the intraoperative impedances and in the neural response telemetry threshold values in the Nucleus Freedom Contour Advance before and after stylet removal.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical study. Intraoperative impedances and neural response telemetry in users of the Freedom Contour Advance Cochlear Implant were measured before and after stylet removal.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the impedance values of an average 1.5 kOmega+/-2.3 in common ground mode and 1.3 kOmega+/-2.3 for all monopolar modes after the stylet removal (p < 0.001). When analyzing the apical, medium, and basal electrodes, there was a statistically significant reduction in the neural response thresholds after stylet removal only in the apical electrodes (p = 0.001).

What's new in the AFIP fascicle on salivary gland tumors: a few highlights from the 4th Series Atlas

After a 12 year interval from the previous fascicle, a new fascicle on Tumors of the Salivary Glands in the new fourth series of the AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology was published in 2008. The data, presentation, illustrations, tables, and physical characteristics of the newest fascicle have been updated and improved. There have only been a few alterations and additions to the classification of tumors and tumor-like non-neoplastic conditions of salivary gland. Three of the most significant are discussed in this paper. Sialoblastoma has been reclassified as malignant; inflammatory pseudotumor has been reclassified as neoplastic and re-identified as inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor; and sclerosing polycystic adenosis is a new entity among tumor-like conditions.

Electrophysiological effects of electrode pull-back in cochlear implant surgery

CONCLUSION

The surgical technique of electrode pull-back had a significant improving effect on the spread of excitation (SOE). However, the long-term clinical and audiological outcome of this modified surgical technique should be a subject of further studies.

OBJECTIVE

To observe the intraoperative electrophysiological effects of a surgical electrode insertion technique (i.e. pull-back) in cochlear implantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The influence of the pull-back technique on intraoperatively recorded electrophysiological parameters (including T-NRT, ECAP amplitude, SOE) was investigated in a prospective, non-randomized, intraoperative study. In addition, we observed the correlation of insertion depth and SOE differences after a controlled electrode pull-back. We implanted 13 patients (aged 18-76 years) with a Nucleus 24CI RE cochlear implant with a perimodiolar electrode.

RESULTS

After a controlled pull-back, a significant decrease of the SOE at different electrodes (upon recording from electrodes 5, 10, 15) was observed. Electrode 10 was the SOE area with the most significant and homogeneous changes after pull-back. The change in the ECAP amplitudes was highly variable in correlation with the changes in the SOE.

High-resolution in situ imaging of cochlear implant electrode arrays in cat temporal bones using Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the suitability of Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT) to generate high-resolution images of intracochlear electrode arrays, in situ, with sufficient anatomic and electrode detail to relate the location of individual electrode contacts to important anatomic landmarks in cat cadaveric temporal bones. The ultimate objective is to develop an imaging technology whereby variations in electrode location, relative to the target neural tissues, can be accurately determined and related to variations in performance with the cochlear implant.

DESIGN

Cat temporal bones were implanted with an experimental scala tympani electrode array and an external fiducial landmark. A series of conventional 2D digital radiographs were collected from a variety of x-ray source projection angles and served as for generation of 3D volume renderings using the TACT software toolbox. The 3D renderings were then reoriented and resliced interactively to view the cochlear and electrode features of interest.

RESULTS

Significant electrode and anatomical details could be visualized including the course of the electrode wires (<40 microm diameter), the location of all electrode contacts and the outline of the scala tympani.

CONCLUSIONS

TACT generates high-resolution 3D images from 2D conventional radiographs. With TACT, the 3D renderings can be interactively reoriented and resectioned to permit visualization of any cochlear or electrode feature. In the present study, this aspect of TACT affords the opportunity to view of the location of each electrode contact relative to the adjacent cochlear features, such as the scalar walls. Because TACT uses conventional radiographic images to generate the volume renderings, the quality and resolution of the resulting 2D images do not suffer from artifacts characteristic of CT. These findings suggest that TACT may be a powerful tool for understanding the contribution of electrode placement to perceptual performance with the cochlear implant.

The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users

CONCLUSION

Neither speech understanding nor frequency discrimination ability was better in Nucleus Contour users than in Nucleus 24 straight electrode users. Furthermore, perimodiolar electrode placement does not result in better frequency discrimination.

OBJECTIVES

We addressed three questions related to perimodiolar electrode placement. First, do patients implanted with the Contour electrode understand speech better than with an otherwise identical device that has a straight electrode? Second, do these groups have different frequency discrimination abilities? Third, is the distance of the electrode from the modiolus related to frequency discrimination ability?

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Contour and straight electrode users were matched on four important variables. We then tested these listeners on CNC word and HINT sentence identification tasks, and on a formant frequency discrimination task. We also examined X-rays and measured the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus to determine whether there is a relationship between this factor and frequency discrimination ability.

RESULTS

Both speech understanding and frequency discrimination abilities were similar for listeners implanted with the Contour vs a straight electrode. Furthermore, there was no linear relationship between electrode-modiolus distance and frequency discrimination ability. However, we did note a second-order relationship between these variables, suggesting that frequency discrimination is worse when the electrodes are either too close or too far away from the modiolus.