2
|
Ge BH, Weber CN, Wildenberg JC, Nadolski GJ, Gade TP, Hunt SJ, Soulen MC, Itkin M. Magnetic Resonance-Monitored Coaxial Electrochemical Ablation--Preliminary Evaluation of Technical Feasibility. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015. [PMID: 26210247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the technical feasibility of a coaxial electrode configuration to rapidly create a mechanically defined electrochemical ablation zone monitored by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in real time. MATERIALS AND METHODS A direct current generator supplied the nitinol cathode cage and central platinum anode for coaxial electrochemical ablation. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by measuring local pH, temperature, and current scatter in saline solutions. Ablation zone diameters of 3-6 cm (n = 72) were created on ex vivo bovine liver and verified by gross pathology. Feasibility of MR monitoring was evaluated using 8 swine livers to create ablations of 3 cm (n = 12), 4 cm (n = 4), and 5 cm (n = 4) verified by histology. RESULTS Local pH was 3.2 at the anode and 13.8 at the cathode. Current scatter was negligible. Ablation progress increased relative to local ion concentration, and MR signal changes corresponded to histologic findings. In the ex vivo model, the times to achieve complete ablation were 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 35 minutes, and 40 minutes for diameters of 3 cm, 4 cm, 5 cm, and 6 cm, respectively. Ablation times for the in situ model were 15 minutes, 35 minutes, and 50 minutes for 3 cm, 4 cm, and 5 cm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The coaxial configuration mechanically defined the electrochemical ablation zone with times similar to comparably sized thermal ablations. MR compatibility allowed for real-time monitoring of ablation progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin H Ge
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
| | - Charles N Weber
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Joseph C Wildenberg
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Gregory J Nadolski
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Terence P Gade
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Stephen J Hunt
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Maxim Itkin
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Penn Image Guided Interventions Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Electromechanical reshaping (EMR) has been recently described as an alternative method for reshaping facial cartilage without the need for incisions or sutures. This study focuses on determining the short- and long-term viability of chondrocytes following EMR in cartilage grafts maintained in tissue culture. Flat rabbit nasal septal cartilage specimens were bent into semi-cylindrical shapes by an aluminum jig while a constant electric voltage was applied across the concave and convex surfaces. After EMR, specimens were maintained in culture media for 64 days. Over this time period, specimens were serially biopsied and then stained with a fluorescent live–dead assay system and imaged using laser scanning confocal microscopy. In addition, the fraction of viable chondrocytes was measured, correlated with voltage, voltage application time, electric field configuration, and examined serially. The fraction of viable chondrocytes decreased with voltage and application time. High local electric field intensity and proximity to the positive electrode also focally reduced chondrocyte viability. The density of viable chondrocytes decreased over time and reached a steady state after 2–4 weeks. Viable cells were concentrated within the central region of the specimen. Approximately 20% of original chondrocytes remained viable after reshaping with optimal voltage and application time parameters and compared favorably with conventional surgical shape change techniques such as morselization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry E Protsenko
- Beckman Laser Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gravante G, Ong SL, Metcalfe MS, Bhardwaj N, Maddern GJ, Lloyd DM, Dennison AR. Experimental application of electrolysis in the treatment of liver and pancreatic tumours: principles, preclinical and clinical observations and future perspectives. Surg Oncol 2010; 20:106-20. [PMID: 20045634 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2009] [Revised: 11/18/2009] [Accepted: 12/07/2009] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrolytic ablation (EA) is a treatment that destroys tissues through electrochemical changes in the local microenvironment. This review examined studies using EA for the treatment of liver and pancreatic tumours, in order to define the characteristics that could endow the technique with specific advantages compared with other ablative modalities. METHODS Literature search of all studies focusing on liver and pancreas EA. RESULTS A specific advantage of EA is its safety even when conducted close to major vessels, while a disadvantage is the longer ablation times compared to more frequently employed techniques. Bimodal electric tissue ablation modality combines radiofrequency with EA and produced significant larger ablation zones compared to EA or radiofrequency alone, reducing the time required for ablation. Pancreatic EA has been investigated in experimental studies that confirmed similar advantages to those found with liver ablation, but has never been evaluated on patients. Furthermore, few clinical studies examined the results of liver EA in the short-term but there is no appropriate follow-up to confirm any survival advantage. CONCLUSIONS EA is a safe technique with the potential to treat lesions close to major vessels. Specific clinical studies are required to confirm the technique's safety and eventually demonstrate a survival advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gravante
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schaefer N, Schafer H, Maintz D, Wagner M, Overhaus M, Hoelscher AH, Türler A. Efficacy of direct electrical current therapy and laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy in local treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases: an experimental model in the rat. J Surg Res 2007; 146:230-40. [PMID: 17689564 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2007] [Revised: 03/28/2007] [Accepted: 03/28/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local antitumoral therapy of metastases is an important tool in the palliative treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Several authors have recently reported on successful local treatment of different malignant diseases with low-level direct current therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of direct current therapy with the established laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) on experimental colorectal liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Colorectal metastases were induced in 49 BD IX rats by injection of colon cancer cells beneath the liver capsule. Three weeks after induction, tumor volumes and sizes were estimated with magnetic resonance imaging and by manual measurement of the largest tumor diameter, and two treatment groups and two control groups were established. Direct current (80 C/cm(3)) versus LITT (2 W; 5 to 10 min) was locally applied via laparotomy. Control groups were sham treated. Tumor growth was analyzed 5 wk after therapy by manual measurement of the maximal diameter and histopathological examination was performed. RESULTS Measurement of tumor sizes 5 wk after therapy confirmed a significant antitumoral effect of direct current (1.6-fold tumor enlargement) and of LITT (1.3-fold tumor enlargement), compared with controls (2.8-fold and 2.9-fold tumor enlargement). However, after 5 wk, LITT was significantly more effective in limiting tumor growth than direct current treatment (P </= 0,001). Histopathological analysis revealed a complete response rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 77% in the electric current group. In comparison, LITT treated livers showed a complete response rate of 22% and a partial response rate of 78% (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS The data confirm that direct current therapy and LITT are effective treatment strategies in the palliative control of colorectal hepatic metastases, with both therapies being equally effective in inducing a complete or partial tumor necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Schaefer
- Department of Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
von Euler H, Stråhle K, Thörne A, Yongqing G. Cell proliferation and apoptosis in rat mammary cancer after electrochemical treatment (EChT). Bioelectrochemistry 2004; 62:57-65. [PMID: 14990326 PMCID: PMC7129577 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2003] [Revised: 08/25/2003] [Accepted: 10/10/2003] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Several authors have recently reported encouraging results from Electrochemical treatment (EChT) in malignant tumours. However, EChT is not established and mechanisms are not completely understood. In vivo studies were conducted to evaluate the toxic changes and effectiveness of EChT on an animal tumour model. Methods: Tumours were induced by injecting cells from the R3230AC rat mammary tumour cell line clone D subcutaneously, in 28 female Fischer 344 rats. EChT was conducted by inserting a platinum electrode into the tumours. The positive and negative control groups were subjected to the same conditions but without current. The rats were kept for 0, 7 or 14 days post-treatment. Three hours prior to euthanasia an i.p. injection of Bromodioxyuridine (BrdU) was given. The rats were euthanized, the lesions extirpated and samples were collected for histopathological, and immunohistochemical examination. Results: Significant changes in cell proliferation rate were seen both in the cathode and anode regions. Apoptosis were induced in the anodic treated area outside the primary necrosis, detected with the TUNEL method. Discussion: The results suggest that secondary cell destruction was caused by necrosis with cathodic EChT and apoptosis or necrosis with anodic EChT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H von Euler
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 7037, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|