Adherence, risk factors of non-adherence and patient's preferred treatment strategy of mesalazine in ulcerative colitis: multicentric observational study

Medication Non-Adherence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review Identifying Risk Factors and Opportunities for Intervention

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is treated with medications to induce and maintain remission. However, many people with IBD do not take their prescribed treatment. Identifying factors associated with IBD medication adherence is crucial for supporting effective disease management and maintaining remission. Quantitative and qualitative studies researching IBD medication adherence between 2011 and 2023 were reviewed. In total, 36,589 participants were included in 79 studies. The associated non-adherence factors were contradictory across studies, with rates notably higher (72-79%) when measured via medication refill. Non-adherence was lower in high-quality studies using self-report measures (10.7-28.7%). The frequent modifiable non-adherence risks were a poor understanding of treatment or disease, medication accessibility and an individual's organisation and planning. Clinical variables relating to non-adherence were the treatment type, drug regime and disease activity. Depression, negative treatment beliefs/mood and anxiety increased the non-adherence likelihood. The non-modifiable factors of limited finance, younger age and female sex were also risks. Side effects were the main reason cited for IBD non-adherence in interviews. A large, contradictory set of literature exists regarding the factors underpinning IBD non-adherence, influenced by the adherence measures used. Simpler medication regimes and improved accessibility would help to improve adherence. IBD education could enhance patient knowledge and beliefs. Reminders and cues might minimise forgetting medication. Modifying risks through an adherence support intervention could improve outcomes.

Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Russia: TIGE-Rus (Telemonitoring for IBD Goodness Examination in Russia) Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), associated with a significant burden on patients' lives, are becoming increasingly common. Patients with IBD need continuous treatment and lifelong monitoring, which could be achieved by telemonitoring. Telemonitoring has been shown to be effective in improving outcomes for patients with IBD, and can provide a more convenient and accessible way for patients to receive care. However, the certainty of evidence remains low. This article outlines the methodology of a randomized control study that aims to assess the efficacy of telemonitoring compared to face-to-face follow-up for patients with IBD in Russia, hypothesizing that the implementation of telemonitoring will lead to improvement in clinical, social, and organizational areas. Methods: The TIGE-Rus study is a randomized controlled trial. The study consists of three stages, including selection of patients and random assignment into two groups with a ratio of 1:1, follow-up care using telemonitoring or face-to-face appointments, and evaluation and comparison of follow-up efficacy in both groups. In the first stage, all patients will undergo laboratory tests and instrumental examinations, and fill out questionnaires to measure disease activity, quality of life, medication adherence, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with medical care. In the second stage, the control group will receive standard care while the telemonitoring group will have access to a web platform where they can report their clinical activity, fill out questionnaires, and have online consultations with gastroenterologists. The gastroenterologists will also make monthly phone calls to each patient in the telemonitoring group to monitor their progress. In the third stage of the study, both the telemonitoring group and the control group will be re-hospitalized after six months of monitoring. IBD activity will be evaluated through laboratory and instrumental examinations. Additionally, all the participants will complete questionnaires to assess the disease activity, medication adherence, quality of life, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with medical care in both groups. Conclusions: The trial will explore whether telemonitoring is effective in improving clinical, social, and organizational aspects in the management of patients with IBD in the setting of the Russian healthcare system.

Practical management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: an international expert consensus

INTRODUCTION

Although there are well-defined guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), there are still unmet needs. For this reason, we conducted an international expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild-to-moderate UC and provide practical guidance to clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

Based on Delphi methodology, 15 statements were approved after two rounds of voting, addressing several aspects of disease management from sequencing to treatment duration, from monitoring to optimization techniques and safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing knowledge of mild-to-moderate UC has led to the development of new ambitious outcomes such as histological remission and disease clearance. Furthermore, noninvasive tools for patient monitoring such as fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound are now available. Their implementation in clinical practice will allow clinicians to tightly monitor disease activity and promptly adapt treatment, avoiding complications and disease progression and targeting better disease control.

Inflammatory bowel disease patients' perspectives of non-medical needs

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) imposes a huge burden on the healthcare systems and greatly declines the patient's quality of life. However, there is a paucity of detailed data regarding information and supportive needs as well as sources and methods of obtaining information to control different aspects of the disease from the perspectives of the patients themselves. This study aimed to establish the IBD patients' preferences of informational and supportive needs through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).

METHODS

IBD patients were recruited from different centers. Considering inclusion and exclusion criteria, 521 participants were filled a predefined questionnaire. This questionnaire was prepared through literature review of the recent well-known guidelines on the needs of IBD patients, which was further approved by the experts of IBD area in three rounds of Delphi consensus. It includes 56 items in four sections of informational needs (25), supportive needs (15), sources of information (7), and methods of obtaining information (9).

RESULTS

In particular, EFA was used to apply data reduction and structure detection. Given that this study tries to identify patterns, structures as well as inter-relationships and classification of the variables, EFA was utilized to simplify presentation of the variables in a way that large amounts of observations transform into fewer ones. Accordingly, the EFA identified five factors out of 25 items in the information needs section, three factors out of 15 items in the supportive needs section, two factors out of 7 items in the information sources section, and two factors out of 9 items in the information presentation methods. Through the CFA, all 4 models were supported by Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation (RMSEA); Incremental Fit Index (IFI); Comparative Fit Index (CFI); Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI); and SRMR. These values were within acceptable ranges, indicating that the twelve factors achieved from EFA were validated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study introduced a reliable 12-factor model as an efficient tool to comprehensively identify preferences of IBD patients in informational and supportive needs along with sources and methods of obtaining information. An in-depth understanding of the needs of IBD patients facilitates informing and supporting health service provision. It also assists patients in a fundamental way to improve adaptation and increase the quality of life. We suggest that health care providers consider the use of this tool in clinical settings in order to precisely assess its efficacy.

Management and treatment optimization of patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with a significant health-care burden worldwide. While medical therapy aims to induce and maintain remission, optimal management of mild to moderate UC remains challenging due to heterogeneity in severity classifications and non-standardized approaches. This comprehensive review summarizes current evidence and knowledge gaps to optimize clinical decision-making in patients with mild to moderate UC.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase through August 2023, we provide an overview of definitions utilized to characterize mild to moderate UC severity and established therapeutic targets. Current medical treatments including mesalazine formulations, corticosteroids, and their combinations are surveyed. The role of emerging intestinal ultrasound, telemedicine, and home testing is explored. Individualized, patient-centered paradigms aiming to streamline care delivery through proactive identification of relapses are also examined.

EXPERT OPINION

Addressing inconsistencies in disease activity stratification will better align tailored regimens with each patient's profile. Advancing noninvasive technologies like ultrasound criteria and home testing could improve UC management by enabling personalized models. Realizing individualized plans through informed shared-decision making between health-care providers and fully engaged patients holds promise to maximize quality of life outcomes. Continuous improvement relies on innovation bridging different domains to overcome current limitations and push the field toward more predictive and tailored care.

Treatment of Patients with Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Middle East Expert Consensus

The prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Middle East is increasing, impacting the economic and healthcare burden. The management of patients with mild to moderate UC is still a challenge as several factors can affect optimal care, including drug choice, induction and maintenance dose, treatment optimization and de-escalation, therapy duration, monitoring, and safety profile. We conducted an expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild to moderate UC. Sixteen experts in inflammatory bowel diseases, through a well-established and accepted Delphi methodology, voted and approved eight statements in order to provide practical guidance to clinicians in the Middle East.

Medication Adherence in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Who Are Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors: A Qualitative Study

Medication adherence is critical for optimal health outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). However, this population struggles with medication nonadherence. Research that comprehensively describes the complex patient- and medication-related factors which impact medication adherence in this population is lacking. Hence, we used semistructured qualitative interviews to explore the diverse and complex factors contributing to medication adherence in HSCT recipients. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews with patients who were more than 180 days post-allogeneic HSCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. The interviews explored the physical, social, psychological, and sociodemographic factors that facilitate or discourage adherence to the post-transplantation medication regimen. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using NVivo software. Two themes emerged that characterized the barriers patients face with their medication regimen. Patients reported factors outside of their control, such as managing multiple pharmacies, health insurance difficulties, and dosage timing, as significant barriers to medication adherence. Patients also reported barriers within their control, such as familial responsibilities. Important facilitators for medication adherence included caregiver and clinician support, previous experience managing a medication regimen, and tools that aid pill organization and timing. Furthermore, patients reported that although medication side effects and quantity of pills did not directly impact medication adherence, it increased their psychological distress. Facilitators and barriers to medication adherence can be physical, psychological, organizational, and social. There are many aspects of medication regimens that significantly increase patient distress. Hence, supportive interventions to improve medication adherence in patients undergoing HSCT may need to incorporate strategies to manage medication side effects and skills to improve psychological well-being and social support.

Patient Perspectives and Expectations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In this systematic review, our objective was to assess inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient preferences and perspectives relating to their disease diagnosis, treatment, knowledge needs and telemedicine.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four databases and conference proceedings were searched between January 1, 1980, and May 1, 2020. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Standards for reporting qualitative research checklist.

RESULTS

Our search identified 240 citations and 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. The major expectations of the patients are symptomatic and pain control, quality of life and normal endoscopy. Patients' main concerns are access to information and healthcare, and shared decision making. At the time of diagnosis, patients expressed a greater need for knowledge about their IBD, preferentially by their treating gastroenterologist. The main treatment expectations in active disease are efficacy, safety and convenience. Patients are willing to accept relatively high risks of complications from medical therapy to avoid a permanent ostomy and to achieve durable remission. Patients are more interested in disease monitoring, research and development during the time of remission. Telemedicine and self-management with supervised e-health tools are feasible and acceptable amongst patients with IBD.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates that patients with IBD expect more information about their disease process, shared decision making and symptom control. Further research is needed to help align patient and physician expectations in order to improve the quality of care provided to patients with IBD.

Patient Preference and Adherence to Aminosalicylates for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that requires sustained treatment for optimal outcomes. The 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) class of medications are first-line for the treatment of mild-to-moderate UC but suffer from suboptimal adherence rates in real-world settings. This review summarizes the literature on adherence and patient preference to 5-ASA in patients with UC. We begin by highlighting key studies that measure real-world adherence rates, as well as some of the pitfalls associated with certain techniques. We examine the data on the consequences of non-adherence, which range from decreased quality of life and higher risk of colorectal cancer at the individual level to increased costs to the overall healthcare system. We then turn to the reasons and risk factors for non-adherence and summarize the current understanding of the barriers towards adherence. Afterwards, we describe the research on patient preferences between 5-ASA formulations and dosing regimen. Finally, we summarize the evidence regarding interventions to improve 5-ASA adherence. While adherence remains a challenge in practice, understanding the current state of the field can better inform future efforts towards increasing adherence, and thus clinical outcomes, in UC.

Factors associated with the persistence of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy in ulcerative colitis: a nationwide Norwegian cohort study

BACKGROUND

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the mainstay treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and therapy with oral 5-ASA is associated with beneficial outcomes. We have examined factors associated with the persistence of oral 5-ASA treatment in a national cohort of UC patients.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed UC from 2010 to 2014 using oral 5-ASA monotherapy were identified by combining data from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescription Database. The median follow-up time was 1029 days. Drug persistence was defined as duration of oral 5-ASA preparation as monotherapy. Non-persistence of a oral 5-ASA preparation as monotherapy was defined as stopping oral 5-ASA, initiation of any further anti-inflammatory treatment including a course of glucocorticoids and a change to another oral 5-ASA preparation. Drug persistence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and influence of covariates on drug persistence was analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 3421 patients were identified. The overall median 5-ASA drug persistence was 179 days. In univariate analyses, persistence was associated with preparation type and high-dose treatment, while oral glucocorticoid use or hospitalization around the start of oral 5-ASA were associated with shorter 5-ASA persistence. In multivariate analyses, oral glucocorticoids [HR 1.67 (1.54-1.80), p < 0.005] and hospitalization around start of 5-ASA [HR 1.23 (1.14-1.34), p < 0.005] were associated with non-persistence, whereas high dose (⩾3 g/day) 5-ASA was associated with longer persistence [HR 0.68 (0.65-0.71), p < 0.005].

CONCLUSION

High-dose treatment with oral 5-ASA was associated with longer persistence of oral 5-ASA monotherapy, whereas the presence of factors indicating more severe disease around initiation of 5-ASA monotherapy was associated with a shorter persistence.

Consensus document on the management preferences of patients with ulcerative colitis: points to consider and recommendations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Our objective was to define, describe and organize (on the basis of consensus) the patient's preferences in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), in order to further incorporate them in daily practice and improve patients satisfaction, adherence to the treatment and quality of care.

METHODS

Qualitative study. A narrative literature review in Medline using Mesh and free-text terms was conducted to identify articles on UC patient preferences as well as clinical scenarios that may influence the preferences. The results were presented and discussed in a multidisciplinary nominal group meeting composed of six gastroenterologists, one primary care physician, one nurse practitioner and one expert patient. Key clinical scenarios and patient preferences were then defined, generating a series of points to consider and recommendations. The level of agreement with the final selection of preferences was established following a Delphi process.

RESULTS

The narrative review retrieved 69 articles of qualitative design and moderate quality. The following key clinical scenarios were identified: diagnosis, follow-up, surgery, and special situations/patients profiles such as adolescents or women. Patient preferences were classified into information, treatment (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), follow-up, relations with health professionals, relations with the health system and administration. Finally, 11 recommendations on patient preferences for UC in relation to its management reached the level of agreement established.

CONCLUSION

The consensual description of patient's preferences contribute to identify different areas for improvement in healthcare practice.

Colitis and Crohn's Foundation (India) consensus statements on use of 5-aminosalicylic acid in inflammatory bowel disease

Despite several recent advances in therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy has retained its place especially in ulcerative colitis. This consensus on 5-ASA is obtained through a modified Delphi process, and includes guiding statements and recommendations based on literature evidence (randomized trials, and observational studies), clinical practice, and expert opinion on use of 5-ASA in IBD by Indian gastroenterologists. The aim is to aid practitioners in selecting appropriate treatment strategies and facilitate optimal use of 5-ASA in patients with IBD.

Comparison of persistence and adherence between DPP-4 inhibitor administration frequencies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims-based cohort study

Objective: To explore persistence and adherence with once-daily, twice-daily, or once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study used data from the Japanese nationwide hospital-based Medical Data Vision (MDV) administrative claims database. Data were collected for patients given a new DPP-4i prescription between May 2015 and June 2017 with 1-year follow-up until May 2018. Treatment persistence was defined as the total duration of continuous prescription. Adherence to treatment was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC).Results: A total of 598,419 patients with a prescription for DPP-4i treatment were identified in the MDV database. Of the 39,826 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 82.4% were receiving once-daily DPP-4i, 15.6% twice-daily DPP-4i, and 2.0% once-weekly DPP-4i. Twelve-month persistence rates with once-daily regimens were 66.3% versus 64.7% with twice-daily (p = .1187), and versus 38.8% with once-weekly, regimens (p < .0001) in the overall population (including untreated [UT] and previously treated [PT] patients); 62.8% with once-daily versus 58.3% with twice-daily (p = .0309), and versus 12.3% with once-weekly regimens (p < .0001) in the UT cohort; and 68.6% with once-daily versus 67.9% with twice-daily (p = .5471), and versus 49.1% with once-weekly regimens (p < .0001) in the PT cohort. In the overall population, 97.8% of patients had a mean PDC of 0.97 with once- and twice-daily, and 65.8% of patients had a mean PDC of 0.74 with once-weekly, DPP-4i regimens.Conclusions: Overall, persistence at 12 months was highest in patients receiving once-daily DPP-4i regimens.

Impact and risk factors of non-adherence to 5-aminosalicylates in quiescent ulcerative colitis evaluated by an electronic management system

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of non-adherence to 5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) on the risk of flares and to identify risk factors of non-adherence.

METHODS

Observational, cohort study of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in clinical remission at least 6 months on 5-ASA monotherapy maintenance prescribed by an electronic management program. Adherence was considered when 80% of the prescribed 5-ASA had been dispensed at the pharmacy. The study analyzed the existence and degree of 5-ASA adherence, disease course, UC phenotypic expression, and 5-ASA dose and regimen, and consumption of non-UC chronic drugs during 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 274 patients, 49% males with a median age of 38 (27-49) years old. Overall, 41% of patients were non-adherent to 5-ASA. Risk of flares was reduced in the adherent group (36% vs 54%; OR = 0,484; p = 0,004), mainly the mild ones (26% vs 38%; OR = 0,559; p = 0,031). Non-adherence was associated with younger age at diagnosis (32 (26-45) vs 41.5 (21-50), p = 0.000) and no-consumption of other chronic treatments (1.1 vs 2.1; OR = 1709; p = 0,048).

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence to 5-ASA evaluated by the pharmaceutical management system was at 41% with a higher risk of relapse. Younger patients and patients who do not receive non-UC chronic treatments showed lower adherence rate.

Patient Preference and Physician Perceptions of Patient Preference for Oral Pharmaceutical Formulations: Results from a Real-Life Survey

BACKGROUND

Pharmaceutical treatment prescribed according to patient preference for a formulation may have a positive impact on adherence to treatment and consequently on treatment outcomes.

AIM

This study aimed at understanding patient preference for pharmaceutical formulations and attributes that trigger patient preference and physician perception of patient preference.

METHODS

Between August and September 2017, gastroenterologists and patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis from France, Germany, Spain, and the UK participated in an online survey. The investigation was exploratory in nature, and descriptive results are presented.

RESULTS

Patient (n = 380) preference appears to be driven by the appearance (format, shape, size, and color - 44%), number of units per administration (39%), and number of administrations per day (17%). Gastroenterologist (n = 159) preference is instead driven by the number of administrations per day (55%), number of units per day (26%), and tablet size (19%). Overall, 254 (67%) patients preferred a tablet formulation, 111 (29%) preferred granules, and 15 (4%) other formulations. According to gastroenterologist perception of patient preference, only 49% of patients prefer tablets, 38% prefer granules, and 13% have no preference. After switching from granules to tablets, 25% patients expressed negative feelings for granules. However, after switching from tablets to granules, 44% of patients still have positive perceptions of tablets. Among patients receiving tablets (n = 255), 18 (7%) perceived their treatment to be not at all effective versus 16 (13%) patients receiving granules (n = 125). A similar proportion of patients in the two groups perceived their treatment as extremely effective (48 vs. 46%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients generally prefer tablets. Patient and gastroenterologist perception of patient preference for different oral drug formulations is triggered by the same attributes but with inverse importance. To improve adherence, patients should be involved in the choice of the treatment formulation.