Benefits of accelerated hyperfractionation for head and neck cancer

Escalating a Biological Dose of Radiation in the Target Volume Applying Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Head and Neck Region Tumours

Background: The treatment of head and neck tumours is a complicated process usually involving surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatment. Despite the multidisciplinary approach, treatment outcomes are still unsatisfactory, especially considering malignant tumours such as squamous cell carcinoma or sarcoma, where the frequency of recurrence has reached 50% of cases. The implementation of modern and precise methods of radiotherapy, such as a radiosurgery boost, may allow for the escalation of the biologically effective dose in the gross tumour volume and improve the results of treatment. Methods: The administration of a stereotactic radiotherapy boost can be done in two ways: an upfront boost followed by conventional radio(chemo)therapy or a direct boost after conventional radio(chemo)therapy. The boost dose depends on the primary or nodal tumour volume and localization regarding the organs at risk. It falls within the range of 10–18 Gy. Discussion: The collection of detailed data on the response of the disease to the radiosurgery boost combined with conventional radiotherapy as well as an assessment of early and late toxicities will contribute crucial information to the prospective modification of fractionated radiotherapy. In the case of beneficial findings, the stereotactic radiosurgery boost in the course of radio(chemo)therapy in patients with head and neck tumours will be able to replace traditional techniques of radiation, and radical schemes of treatment will be possible for future development.

Durable therapeutic gain despite competing mortality in long-term follow-up of a randomized hyperfractionated radiotherapy trial for locally advanced head and neck cancer

Purpose/objectives

To examine the therapeutic ratio and mortality profile over time in a radiotherapy randomized trial in stage III-IV larynx/pharynx cancer with long-term follow-up.

Materials/methods

From 1988 to 1995, 331 cases were randomized to either hyperfractionated (HF) (58 Gy/40 fractions, twice daily) or conventional (CF) (51 Gy/20 fractions, once daily) radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), locoregional (LRC), distant control (DC), ≥Grade 3 late toxicity (LT), and relative mortality risk profile over time were compared between both arms.

Results

Median follow-up was 13.6 years. HF had a 10% improved OS at 5-years (40% vs 30%, p = 0.04), but the benefit diminished to 3% at 10-years (21% vs 18%). A trend towards higher LRC with HF remained (5-year: 49% vs 40%; 10-year: 49% vs 39%, p = 0.05). DC rates were unchanged (5-year: 87% vs 85%; 10-year: 87 vs 84%, p = 0.56). LT rates were similar (HF vs CF: 5-year: 9% vs 12%; 10-year: 11% vs 14%, p = 0.27). Multivariable analysis confirmed that HF reduced mortality risk by 31% [HR 0.69 (0.55-0.88), p < 0.01] and locoregional failure risk by 35% [HR 0.65 (0.48-0.89), p < 0.01]. Index cancer mortality (5-year: 46% vs 51%; 10-year: 49% vs 55%) was lower in the HF arm. Competing mortality (mostly smoking-related) was also numerically lower with HF at 5-years (14% vs 19%) but became similar at 10-years (30% vs 28%).

Conclusions

This trial confirms that HF with augmented total dose has a durable 10% effect size on LRC with comparable LT. OS benefit is evident at 5-years (10%) but relative mortality risk profile changes in longer follow-up.

Radiation-induced DNA damage as a predictor of long-term toxicity in locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with high-dose hyperfractionated radical radiotherapy

This 14-year-long study makes a novel contribution to the debate on the relationship between the in vitro radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes and normal tissue reactions after radiation therapy. The aims were (1) to prospectively assess the degree and time of onset of skin side effects in 40 prospectively recruited consecutive patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with a hyperfractionated dose-escalation radiotherapy schedule and (2) to assess whether initial radiation-induced DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of these patients could be used to determine their likelihood of suffering severe late damage to normal tissue. Initial radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were assessed in peripheral blood lymphocytes of these patients by pulsed-field electrophoresis. Acute and late cutaneous and subcutaneous toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity score. A wide interindividual variation was observed in toxicity grades and in radiation-induced DNA DSBs in peripheral blood lymphocytes (mean 1.61 +/- 0.76 DSBs/Gy per 200 MBp, range 0.63- 4.08), which were not correlated. Multivariate analysis showed a correlation (P < 0.008) between late toxicity and higher prescribed protocol dose (81.6 Gy). Analysis of the 29 patients referred to 81.6 Gy revealed significantly (P < 0.031) more frequent late subcutaneous toxicity in those with intrinsic sensitivity to radiation-induced DNA DSBs of >1.69 DSBs/Gy per DNA unit. Our demonstration of a relationship between the sensitivity of in vitro-irradiated peripheral blood lymphocytes and the risk of developing late toxic effects opens up the possibility of predicting normal tissue response to radiation in individual patients, at least in high-dose non-conventional radiation therapy regimens.

Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LCAF)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To study the efficacy of late course accelerated fractionated (LCAF) radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The end-points were local control, radiation-induced complications, and factors influencing survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1995 and April 1998, 178 consecutive NPC patients were admitted for radiation treatment. The radiation beam used was (60)Co gamma or 6 MV X rays. For the first two-thirds of the treatment, two daily fractions of 1.2 Gy were given to the primary lesion, with an interval of > or =6h, 5 days per week to a total dose of 48 Gy/40 fractions, over a period of 4 weeks. For the last third of the treatment, i.e., beginning the 5th week of treatment, an accelerated hyperfractionated schedule was carried out. The dose per fraction was increased to 1.5 Gy, 2 fractions per day with an interval of > or =6h, the total dose for this part of the protocol was 30 Gy/20 fractions over 2 weeks. Thus the total dose was 78 Gy in 60 fractions in 6 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients completed the treatment. Acute mucositis: none in 2 cases, Grade 1 in 43 cases, Grade 2 in 78 cases, Grade 3 in 52 cases, and Grade 4 in 3 cases. Local control rate: the 5 year nasopharyngeal local control rate was 87.7%, and the cervical lymph nodes local control rate was 85.7%. The 5-year distant metastasis rate was 26.1%, and 5 year survivals were 67.9%, 16 (9%) patients had radiation-induced cranial nerve palsy, 7(4%) patients had temporal lobe or brainstem damage.

CONCLUSIONS

With this treatment schedule, patients' tolerance was good, local control and 5 year survivals were better than conventional fractionation schedules, and radiation-related late complications did not increase, as 5-year survival rates of conventional fractionation radiotherapy were only 58%. Randomized clinical trials are being carried out to further confirm the efficacy of LCAF for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although head and neck cancer can be cured by radiotherapy, the optimum treatment time for locoregional control is unclear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time by use of six instead of five radiotherapy fractions per week improves the tumour response in squamous-cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, controlled, randomised trial. Between January, 1992, and December, 1999, of 1485 patients treated with primary radiotherapy alone, 1476 eligible patients were randomly assigned five (n=726) or six (n=750) fractions per week at the same total dose and fraction number (66-68 Gy in 33-34 fractions to all tumour sites except well-differentiated T1 glottic tumours, which were treated with 62 Gy). All patients, except those with glottic cancers, also received the hypoxic radiosensitiser nimorazole. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

More than 97% of the patients received the planned total dose. Median overall treatment times were 39 days (six-fraction group) and 46 days (five-fraction group). Overall 5-year locoregional control rates were 70% and 60% for the six-fraction and five-fraction groups, respectively (p=0.0005). The whole benefit of shortening of treatment time was seen for primary tumour control (76 vs 64% for six and five fractions, p=0.0001), but was non-significant for neck-node control. Six compared with five fractions per week improved preservation of the voice among patients with laryngeal cancer (80 vs 68%, p=0.007). Disease-specific survival improved (73 vs 66% for six and five fractions, p=0.01) but not overall survival. Acute morbidity was significantly more frequent with six than with five fractions, but was transient.

INTERPRETATION

The shortening of overall treatment time by increase of the weekly number of fractions is beneficial in patients with head and neck cancer. The six-fractions-weekly regimen has become the standard treatment in Denmark.

Impact of overall treatment time on local control of anal cancer treated with radiochemotherapy

Between 1987 and 2000, 111 patients with epidermoid anal cancer (T1-T4 Nx M0) were assigned to primary simultaneous radiochemotherapy (RCT) with a radiation dose of 45 Gy, performed either as a split course with 2-Gy single fractions (schedule A, 1987-1996, n = 65 patients) or continuously with fractions of 1.8 Gy (schedule B, 1996-2000; n = 38 patients). The chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 800/1,000 mg/m(2)/day, on 4/5 consecutive days, during weeks 1 and 5) together with one (schedule A) or two (schedule B) short infusions of mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2)) during the first course of 5-FU. Associations between clinical outcome and various prognostic factors were assessed in 103 patients who completed these schedules. For both patient groups combined, 5-year local control rate was 67% and 5-year survival rate 71%. Advanced tumor stage, size, and nodal status significantly decreased the 5-year local control rate as well as the overall treatment time (OTT) >41 days (58% for OTT >41 days vs. 79% for OTT < or =41 days; p = 0.04). However, we did not find a correlation with the prescribed radiotherapy schedule (A or B). In conclusion, in patients with anal carcinomas treated with RCT with a radiation dose of 45 Gy, the predominant determinant of local control is the resulting OTT and not the administration schedule (split course or continuous radiotherapy).

Compliance to the prescribed dose and overall treatment time in five randomized clinical trials of altered fractionation in radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinomas

PURPOSE

To investigate compliance to the prescribed dose-fractionation schedule in five randomized controlled trials of altered fractionation in radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Individual patient data from 2566 patients participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22791, EORTC 22811, EORTC 22851, Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH), and continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) head-and-neck trials were merged in the fractionation IMPACT (Intergroup Merger of Patient data from Altered or Conventional Treatment schedules) study database. The ideal treatment time was defined as the minimum time required to deliver a prescribed schedule. Compliance to the prescribed overall treatment time was quantified as the difference between the actual and the ideal overall time. An overall measure of compliance in an individual patient, the total dose lost (TDL), was calculated as the dose lost due to prolongation of therapy (assuming a D(prolif) of 0.64 Gy/day) plus the difference between the prescribed and the actual dose given.

RESULTS

The time in excess of the ideal ranged up to 97 days (average 3.9 days), and 25% of the patients had delays of 6 days or more. World Health Organization (WHO) performance status and nodal stage had a significant effect on TDL. TDL was significantly higher in the conventional than in the altered arm of the EORTC 22851 and CHART trials. In the PMH trial, TDL was significantly higher in the hyperfractionation than in the conventional arm. Centers participating in the three EORTC trials varied significantly in their compliance. There was a significant improvement in compliance in patients treated more recently.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in randomized controlled trials, compliance to the prescribed radiation therapy schedule may be relatively poor, especially after conventional fractionation. This affects the interpretation of the outcome of these trials.

Altered fractionation in the treatment of head and neck cancer

Several altered fractionation schemes have evolved to exploit different aspects of head and neck cancer growth kinetics and normal tissue repair. Hyperfractionation schedules exploit the differential repair abilities of tumor and normal tissue, whereas accelerated fractionation regimens minimize the time of tumor repopulation. Significant clinical data have accumulated that indicate an improvement between 15% and 20% in locoregional control from altered fractionation. Preliminary analysis of a randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial testing four fractionation schemes confirms the benefit of one altered fractionation approach. Several promising concurrent chemoradiation treatments involving altered fractionation have been reported. Future trials will determine whether the addition of chemotherapy to altered fractionation schemes is warranted in light of the factor of added toxicity.

Simultaneous radiochemotherapy versus concomitant boost radiation for advanced inoperable head and neck cancer

In this prospective, non-randomized study we compare the results of simultaneous radiochemotherapy (RCT) with those of concomitant boost treatment (CBT) in advanced head and neck cancer. From January 1993 to March 1999, 77 patients were treated with cisplatin, 5-FU, and 70.2 Gy (accelerated split-course); from January 1995 to March 1999, a further 33 patients received CBT to a total dose of 72 Gy. Toxicities were prospectively recorded according to RTOG/EORTC criteria. Acute and subacute reactions did not differ significantly. Severe late effects (III/IV) remained anecdotal (one fistula). Therapy-associated mortalities were 3%(RCT) vs. 0% (CBT), most tumors responding well to therapy (CR + PR: RCT: 72%, CBT: 63%). The 2-year probabilities for freedom from locoregional progression amounted to 42% (RCT) and 31% (CBT); p > 0.05. Tumor-specific 2-year survival amounted to 40% (RCT) and 34% (CBT); p > 0.05. Both of the treatment concepts yield high remission rates with moderate toxicities. Nevertheless, median time to recurrence is still fairly short. We could not find any differences for local control and survival. For patients who are not able to complete the full three courses of radiochemotherapy, the concomitant boost schedule presents a good alternative.