1
|
Arfuso M, Kuril S, Shah H, Hanson D. Pediatric Neuroglial Tumors: A Review of Ependymoma and Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumor. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 156:139-146. [PMID: 38781722 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Arfuso
- Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | - Harshal Shah
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey
| | - Derek Hanson
- Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey; Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Lami BS, Al-Lami BS, Al-Lami YS. Survival outcomes after using charged particle radiotherapy as a treatment modality for gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024:S1939-8654(24)00106-1. [PMID: 38670903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Charged particle therapy is an emerging radiation treatment for a number of tumors; however, more research is needed to determine its safety and efficacy when treating intra-axial brain tumors (commonly known as gliomas). The overall survival of patients treated with charged particle radiation versus those receiving photon therapy were compared in this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS The databases used as part of the search strategy were the following: MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane. The search was conducted in order to find pertinent clinical studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of overall survival at 1,3, and 5 years. RESULTS Nineteen studies with a total of 1140 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Following treatment, the patient's follow-up period lasted 44.4 months (range: 14.3 - 91.2 months). At one year (relative risk 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 - 1.28; p = 0.049), three years (relative risk 1.73, 95% CI 1.41 - 2.12; p = 0.001), and five years (relative risk 2.00, 95% CI 1.52 - 2.63; p = 0.005), charged particle radiotherapy had a significantly higher pooled overall survival than photon therapy. CONCLUSION Charged particle therapy could be associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with gliomas compared to photon therapy. More prospective randomized trials and comparative studies are strongly encouraged to enable accurate meta-analysis and a better exploration of prognosis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson JS, Main C, Thorp N, Taylor RE, Majothi S, Kearns PR, English M, Dandapani M, Phillips R, Wheatley K, Pizer B. The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children and young adults with Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:1-34. [PMID: 38294638 PMCID: PMC10978619 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04510-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system (CNS) tumours account for around 25% of childhood neoplasms. With multi-modal therapy, 5-year survival is at around 75% in the UK. Conventional photon radiotherapy has made significant contributions to survival, but can be associated with long-term side effects. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) reduces the volume of irradiated tissue outside the tumour target volume which may potentially reduce toxicity. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBT and make recommendations for future research for this evolving treatment. METHODS A systematic review assessing the effects of PBT for treating CNS tumours in children/young adults was undertaken using methods recommended by Cochrane and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Any study design was included where clinical and toxicity outcomes were reported. Searches were to May 2021, with a narrative synthesis employed. RESULTS Thirty-one case series studies involving 1731 patients from 10 PBT centres were included. Eleven studies involved children with medulloblastoma / primitive neuroectodermal tumours (n = 712), five ependymoma (n = 398), four atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour (n = 72), six craniopharyngioma (n = 272), three low-grade gliomas (n = 233), one germ cell tumours (n = 22) and one pineoblastoma (n = 22). Clinical outcomes were the most frequently reported with overall survival values ranging from 100 to 28% depending on the tumour type. Endocrine outcomes were the most frequently reported toxicity outcomes with quality of life the least reported. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights areas of uncertainty in this research area. A well-defined, well-funded research agenda is needed to best maximise the potential of PBT. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42016036802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne S Wilson
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Caroline Main
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicky Thorp
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
- The Christie Hospital Foundation Trust Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Saimma Majothi
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pamela R Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin English
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Madhumita Dandapani
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals' NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Robert Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Barry Pizer
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dias SF, Richards O, Elliot M, Chumas P. Pediatric-Like Brain Tumors in Adults. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2024; 50:147-183. [PMID: 38592530 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-53578-9_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric brain tumors are different to those found in adults in pathological type, anatomical site, molecular signature, and probable tumor drivers. Although these tumors usually occur in childhood, they also rarely present in adult patients, either as a de novo diagnosis or as a delayed recurrence of a pediatric tumor in the setting of a patient that has transitioned into adult services.Due to the rarity of pediatric-like tumors in adults, the literature on these tumor types in adults is often limited to small case series, and treatment decisions are often based on the management plans taken from pediatric studies. However, the biology of these tumors is often different from the same tumors found in children. Likewise, adult patients are often unable to tolerate the side effects of the aggressive treatments used in children-for which there is little or no evidence of efficacy in adults. In this chapter, we review the literature and summarize the clinical, pathological, molecular profile, and response to treatment for the following pediatric tumor types-medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, pilocytic astrocytoma, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, germ cell tumors, choroid plexus tumors, midline glioma, and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma-with emphasis on the differences to the adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Fernandes Dias
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University Children's Hospital of Zurich - Eleonor Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Richards
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin Elliot
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Chumas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Handeland AH, Lægdsmand PM, Toussaint L, Stokkevåg CH, Lassen-Ramshad YA, Klitgaard R, Henjum H, Ytre-Hauge KS, Indelicato DJ, Tjelta J, Lyngholm E, Muren LP. Linear energy transfer-inclusive brainstem necrosis risk models applied to an independent paediatric proton therapy cohort. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1536-1540. [PMID: 37676670 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas H Handeland
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Mt Lægdsmand
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Laura Toussaint
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Camilla H Stokkevåg
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Rasmus Klitgaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Johannes Tjelta
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Erlend Lyngholm
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ludvig P Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gaito S, Aznar MC, Burnet NG, Crellin A, France A, Indelicato D, Kirkby KJ, Pan S, Whitfield G, Smith E. Assessing Equity of Access to Proton Beam Therapy: A Literature Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e528-e536. [PMID: 37296036 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Proton beam therapy (PBT) is one of the most advanced radiotherapy technologies, with growing evidence to support its use in specific clinical scenarios and exponential growth of demand and capacity worldwide over the past few decades. However, geographical inequalities persist in the distribution of PBT centres, which translate into variations in access and use of this technology. The aim of this work was to look at the factors that contribute to these inequalities, to help raise awareness among stakeholders, governments and policy makers. A literature search was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) criteria. The same search strategy was run in Embase and Medline and identified 242 records, which were screened for manual review. Of these, 24 were deemed relevant and were included in this analysis. Most of the 24 publications included in this review originated from the USA (22/24) and involved paediatric patients, teenagers and young adults (61% for children and/or teenagers and young adults versus 39% for adults). The most reported indicator of disparity was socioeconomic status (16/24), followed by geographical location (13/24). All the studies evaluated in this review showed disparities in the access to PBT. As paediatric patients make up a significant proportion of the PBT-eligible patients, equity of access to PBT also raises ethical considerations. Therefore, further research is needed into the equity of access to PBT to reduce the care gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - M C Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N G Burnet
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - A Crellin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Lead Proton Beam Therapy NHS England, UK
| | - A France
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - K J Kirkby
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - S Pan
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - G Whitfield
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E Smith
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perkins SM, Prime S, Watts M, Huang J, Zhao T. Pediatric Experience and Outcomes from the First Single-Vault Compact Proton Therapy Center. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4072. [PMID: 37627100 PMCID: PMC10452472 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The first single-vault compact proton therapy center opened in 2013, utilizing a gantry-mounted synchrocylotron. The center was placed within a large academic radiation oncology department with a high priority for pediatric cancer care. Here we performed a retrospective study of pediatric (≤21 years) patients treated with proton therapy at our institution between 2013-2022. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were obtained including race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, distance travelled, need for anesthesia, and outside referrals for proton therapy. In total, 250 pediatric patients were treated with proton therapy comprising 18% of our proton patient volume. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, 38.4% were female and 83% were white. The majority of cases were CNS (69.6%) and a large number of patients (80/250, 32%) required craniospinal irradiation. Anesthesia was required for 39.6% of patients. Average distance travelled for treatment was 111 miles and 23% of patients were referred from outside institutions for proton therapy. Insurance type was private/commercial for 61.2% followed by Medicaid for 32%. We found that 23% of patients lived in census tracts with >25% of people living below the national poverty line. Overall survival at 3 years was excellent at 83.7% with better outcomes for CNS patients compared to non-CNS patients. There were no cases of secondary malignancy at this early time point. As the world's first compact proton therapy center, we found that proton therapy increased our pediatric volume and provided proton therapy to a diverse group of children in our region. These data highlight some of the expected patient and tumor characteristics and necessary resources for providing pediatric proton beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. Perkins
- S. Lee Kling Proton Therapy Center, Washington University School of Medicine/Siteman Cancer Center, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Howe GN, Edmonston DY, Dirks GC, Boop FA, Merchant TE. Conformal Radiation Therapy for Ependymoma at Age ≤3 Years: A 25-Year Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:869-877. [PMID: 36690160 PMCID: PMC10782549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) affects survival after surgery for young children (age <3 years) diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma. Conformal photon RT promised to spare normal tissue and was introduced more than 25 years ago to improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients. Long-term results for those first treated with conformal methods provide valuable information and serve as a comparison against newer methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1997 and 2018, 101 patients <3.1-years-old were treated with conformal and intensity modulated photon therapy after definitive surgery for intracranial ependymoma. The median age at RT was 2.1 years and the time from diagnosis to the start of RT was 10 weeks. The extent of resection was gross-total in 82%, and 38% underwent more than 1 attempt at resection. The total prescribed dose was 54 to 59.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. RESULTS The 10-year event-free and overall survivals were 58.5% ± 5.0% and 72.6% ± 4.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 18.4 years (range, 4.2-23.3 years). Tumor progression occurred in 34 patients with a median time of 1.6 years. Death occurred in 34 patients from ependymoma (n = 24), secondary malignancy (n = 6), necrosis (n = 2), shunt failure (n = 1), and anaphylactic reaction (n = 1). Twenty-three patients developed a secondary tumor including 6 cases of fatal high-grade glioma. Of the surviving cohort and those ≥18 years old, 98% obtained a high school diploma, 64% had a current driver's license, 89% were students or employed full or part time, 32% were living independently, and 70% received higher education or training. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results of children treated using photon conformal RT after surgery demonstrate that adjuvant RT resulted in long-term disease control and functional independence. These results point to the need for new treatment strategies to improve tumor control and provide investigators hope that newer RT methods will further reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle N Howe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Drucilla Y Edmonston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennesse
| | - Grace C Dirks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Frederick A Boop
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Handeland AH, Indelicato DJ, Fredrik Fjæra L, Ytre-Hauge KS, Pettersen HES, Muren LP, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Stokkevåg CH. Linear energy transfer-inclusive models of brainstem necrosis following proton therapy of paediatric ependymoma. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100466. [PMID: 37457667 PMCID: PMC10345333 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Radiation-induced brainstem necrosis after proton therapy is a severe toxicity with potential association to uncertainties in the proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE). A constant RBE of 1.1 is assumed clinically, but the RBE is known to vary with linear energy transfer (LET). LET-inclusive predictive models of toxicity may therefore be beneficial during proton treatment planning. Hence, we aimed to construct models describing the association between brainstem necrosis and LET in the brainstem. Materials and methods A matched case-control cohort (n = 28, 1:3 case-control ratio) of symptomatic brainstem necrosis was selected from 954 paediatric ependymoma brain tumour patients treated with passively scattered proton therapy. Dose-averaged LET (LETd) parameters in restricted volumes (L50%, L10% and L0.1cm3, the cumulative LETd) within high-dose thresholds were included in linear- and logistic regression normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Results A 1 keV/µm increase in L10% to the brainstem volume receiving dose over 54 Gy(RBE) led to an increased brainstem necrosis risk [95% confidence interval] of 2.5 [0.0, 7.8] percentage points. The corresponding logistic regression model had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76, increasing to 0.84 with the anterior pons substructure as a second parameter. 19 [7, 350] patients with toxicity were required to associate the L10% (D > 54 Gy(RBE)) and brainstem necrosis with 80% statistical power. Conclusion The established models of brainstem necrosis illustrate a potential impact of high LET regions in patients receiving high doses to the brainstem, and thereby support LET mitigation during clinical treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas H. Handeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lars Fredrik Fjæra
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | | | | | - Ludvig P. Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Camilla H. Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boukaka RG, Szathmari A, Di Rocco F, Leblond P, Faure-Conter C, Claude L, Vasiljevic A, Beuriat PA, Mottolese C. Posterior fossa ependymoma in children: A long-term single-center experience. Neurochirurgie 2023; 69:101459. [PMID: 37295279 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ependymomas in the posterior fossa have poor prognosis. This study reports a single-center pediatric series, focusing on the value of surgical resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single-center retrospective study included all patients operated on by the senior author (CM) for posterior fossa ependymoma from 2002 to 2018. Medical and surgical data were extracted from the hospital's medical database. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were included. Age ranged from 6 months to 18 years, with a median of 4.7 years. Fourteen patients underwent initial endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy before the direct surgical resection. Surgical removal was complete in 27 patients. There were 32 surgeries for second-look, local recurrence or metastasis despite complementary chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Twenty patients were WHO grade 2 and 14 grade 3. Sixteen patients showed recurrence (47%). Overall survival was 61.8% at a mean 10.1 years' follow-up. Morbidities comprised facial nerve palsy, swallowing disorder, and transient cerebellar syndrome. Fifteen patients had normal schooling, 6 had special assistance; 4 patients reached university, 3 of whom experienced difficulties. Three patients had a job. CONCLUSION Posterior fossa ependymomas are aggressive tumors. Complete surgical removal is the most important prognostic factor, despite risk of sequelae. Complementary treatment is mandatory, but no targeted therapy has so far proved effective. It is important to continue the search for molecular markers in order to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Boukaka
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France
| | - A Szathmari
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France
| | - F Di Rocco
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France; Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - P Leblond
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, institut d'hématologie et d'oncologie pédiatrique, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - C Faure-Conter
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, institut d'hématologie et d'oncologie pédiatrique, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - L Claude
- Department of Radiotherapy, centre Léon-Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - A Vasiljevic
- Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, GHE, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France
| | - P-A Beuriat
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France; Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - C Mottolese
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hwang EI, Hanson D, Filbin MG, Mack SC. Why haven't we solved intracranial pediatric ependymoma? Current questions and barriers to treatment advances. Neoplasia 2023; 39:100895. [PMID: 36944298 PMCID: PMC10036929 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2023.100895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric intracranial ependymoma has seen a recent exponential expansion of biological findings, rapidly dividing the diagnosis into several subgroups, each with specific molecular and clinical characteristics. While such subdivision may complicate clinical conclusions from historical trials, this knowledge also provides an opportunity for interrogating the major clinical and biological questions preventing near-term translation into effective therapy for children with ependymoma. In this article, we briefly review some of the most critical clinical questions facing both patient management and the construct of future trials in childhood ependymoma, as well as explore some of the current barriers to efficient translation of preclinical discovery to the clinic.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaito S, Hwang EJ, France A, Aznar MC, Burnet N, Crellin A, Holtzman AL, Indelicato DJ, Timmerman B, Whitfield GA, Smith E. Outcomes of Patients Treated in the UK Proton Overseas Programme: Central Nervous System Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:283-291. [PMID: 36804292 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS In 2008, the UK National Health Service started the Proton Overseas Programme (POP), to provide access for proton beam therapy (PBT) abroad for selected tumour diagnoses while two national centres were being planned. The clinical outcomes for the patient group treated for central nervous system (CNS), base of skull, spinal and paraspinal malignancies are reported here. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since the start of the POP, an agreement between the National Health Service and UK referring centres ensured outcomes data collection, including overall survival, local tumour control and late toxicity data. Clinical and treatment-related data were extracted from this national patient database. Grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported following Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0 definition, occurring later than 90 days since the completion of treatment. RESULTS Between 2008 and September 2020, 830 patients were treated within the POP for the above listed malignancies. Overall survival data were available for 815 patients and local control data for 726 patients. Toxicity analysis was carried out on 702 patients, with patients excluded due to short follow-up (<90 days) and/or inadequate toxicity data available. After a median follow-up of 3.34 years (0.06-11.58), the overall survival was 91.2%. The local control rate was 85.9% after a median follow-up of 2.81 years (range 0.04-11.58). The overall grade ≥3 late toxicity incidence was 11.97%, after a median follow-up of 1.72 years (0.04-8.45). The median radiotherapy prescription dose was 54 GyRBE (34.8-79.2). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate the safety of PBT for CNS tumours. Preliminary clinical outcomes following PBT for paediatric/teen and young adult and adult CNS tumours treated within the POP are encouraging, which reflects accurate patient selection and treatment quality. The rate of late effects compares favourably with published cohorts. Clinical outcomes from this patient cohort will be compared with those of UK-treated patients since the start of the national PBT service in 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - E J Hwang
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - A France
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M C Aznar
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N Burnet
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - A Crellin
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; NHS England National Clinical Lead Proton Beam Therapy, UK
| | - A L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - D J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - B Timmerman
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - G A Whitfield
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E Smith
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kiseleva V, Gordon K, Vishnyakova P, Gantsova E, Elchaninov A, Fatkhudinov T. Particle Therapy: Clinical Applications and Biological Effects. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:2071. [PMID: 36556436 PMCID: PMC9785772 DOI: 10.3390/life12122071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy is a developing area of radiotherapy, mostly involving the use of protons, neutrons and carbon ions for cancer treatment. The reduction of side effects on healthy tissues in the peritumoral area is an important advantage of particle therapy. In this review, we analyze state-of-the-art particle therapy, as compared to conventional photon therapy, to identify clinical benefits and specify the mechanisms of action on tumor cells. Systematization of published data on particle therapy confirms its successful application in a wide range of cancers and reveals a variety of biological effects which manifest at the molecular level and produce the particle therapy-specific molecular signatures. Given the rapid progress in the field, the use of particle therapy holds great promise for the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoriia Kiseleva
- National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Konstantin Gordon
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, 249031 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Polina Vishnyakova
- National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Gantsova
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Elchaninov
- National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery”, 117418 Moscow, Russia
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
- A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery”, 117418 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peters S, Frisch S, Stock A, Merta J, Bäumer C, Blase C, Schuermann E, Tippelt S, Bison B, Frühwald M, Rutkowski S, Fleischhack G, Timmermann B. Proton Beam Therapy for Pediatric Tumors of the Central Nervous System-Experiences of Clinical Outcome and Feasibility from the KiProReg Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235863. [PMID: 36497345 PMCID: PMC9737072 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
As radiotherapy is an important part of the treatment in a variety of pediatric tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an evolving role due to its potential benefits attributable to the unique dose distribution, with the possibility to deliver high doses to the target volume while sparing surrounding tissue. Children receiving PBT for an intracranial tumor between August 2013 and October 2017 were enrolled in the prospective registry study KiProReg. Patient's clinical data including treatment, outcome, and follow-up were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Adverse events were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0 before, during, and after PBT. Written reports of follow-up imaging were screened for newly emerged evidence of imaging changes, according to a list of predefined keywords for the first 14 months after PBT. Two hundred and ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study. The 3-year overall survival of the whole cohort was 82.7%, 3-year progression-free survival was 67.3%, and 3-year local control was 79.5%. Seventeen patients developed grade 3 adverse events of the CNS during long-term follow-up (new adverse event n = 7; deterioration n = 10). Two patients developed vision loss (CTCAE 4°). This analysis demonstrates good general outcomes after PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Peters
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-8943
| | - Sabine Frisch
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Annika Stock
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Julien Merta
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Blase
- AnästhesieNetz Rhein-Ruhr, Westenfelder Str. 62/64, 44867 Bochum, Germany
| | - Eicke Schuermann
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Brigitte Bison
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
- Neuroradiological Reference Center for the Pediatric Brain Tumor (HIT) Studies of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Frühwald
- Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Swabian Childrens Cancer Center, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gudrun Fleischhack
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walker DA. Childhood brain tumors: It is the child’s brain that really matters. Front Oncol 2022; 12:982914. [PMID: 36267979 PMCID: PMC9576866 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.982914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
16
|
Intraoperative MRI versus intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumor surgery: is expensive better than cheap? A review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2022; 38:1445-1454. [PMID: 35511271 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05545-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The extent of brain tumor resection (EOR) is a fundamental prognostic factor in pediatric neuro-oncology in association with the histology. In general, resection aims at gross total resection (GTR). Intraoperative imaging like intraoperative US (iOUS) and MRI have been developed in order to find any tumoral remnant but with different costs. Aim of our work is to review the current literature in order to better understand the differences between costs and efficacy of MRI and iOUS to evaluate tumor remnants intraoperatively. METHODS We reviewed the existing literature on PubMed until 31st December 2021 including the sequential keywords "intraoperative ultrasound and pediatric brain tumors", "iUS and pediatric brain tumors", "intraoperative magnetic resonance AND pediatric brain tumors", and "intraoperative MRI AND pediatric brain tumors. RESULTS A total of 300 papers were screened through analysis of title and abstract; 254 were excluded. After selection, a total of 23 articles were used for this systematic review. Among the 929 patients described, a total of 349(38%) of the cases required an additional resection after an iMRI scan. GTR was measured on 794 patients (data of 69 patients lost), and it was achieved in 552(70%) patients. In case of iOUS, GTR was estimated in 291 out of 379 (77%) cases. This finding was confirmed at the post-operative MRI in 256(68%) cases. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of the available literature demonstrates that expensive equipment does not always mean better. In fact, for the majority of pediatric brain tumors, iOUS is comparable to iMRI in estimating the EOR.
Collapse
|
17
|
Orukari I, Perkins S, Zhao T, Huang J, Caruthers DF, Duriseti S. Brainstem Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated with Protons Using a Single-vault Synchrocyclotron System. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:12-17. [PMID: 35774490 PMCID: PMC9238130 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00008.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cranial radiation therapy remains an integral component of curative treatment for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) can limit collateral radiation dose to surrounding normal tissue, thus reducing off-target exposure while maintaining appropriate tumor coverage. While PBT offers significant advantages over photon therapy for pediatric patients with intracranial malignancies, cases of brainstem necrosis after PBT have raised concerns that PBT may pose an increased risk of necrosis over photon therapy. We investigated the incidence of brainstem necrosis at our institution in children treated with PBT for intracranial malignancies. Patients and Methods Patients with pediatric brain tumor treated with passively scattered PBT, using a gantry-mounted, synchrocyclotron single-vault system between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included patients 21 years of age or younger who received a minimum 0.1 cm3 maximum brainstem dose of 50 Gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE). Patients were assessed for “central nervous system necrosis” in the brainstem per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0 (US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) criteria. Results Fifty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median age was 10.3 years. Twenty-one (36.2%) patients received craniospinal irradiation. Thirty-four (58.6%) patients received chemotherapy. The median prescription radiation dose was 54 GyRBE. Regarding published dosimetric constraints used at 3 separate proton centers, the goal brainstem D50% <52 GyRBE was exceeded in 23 (40%) patients, but the brainstem Dmax <58 GyRBE was not exceeded in any patients. No patient experienced grade ≥2 brainstem injury. One patient demonstrated radiographic changes consistent with grade 1 toxicity. This patient had myeloablative chemotherapy with tandem stem cell rescue before PBT. Conclusion Our data demonstrates a low risk of any brainstem injury in children treated with passively scattered PBT using a single-vault synchrocyclotron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inema Orukari
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jiayi Huang
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Douglas F. Caruthers
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sai Duriseti
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malik D, Mahendiratta S, Kaur H, Medhi B. Futuristic approach to cancer treatment. Gene 2021; 805:145906. [PMID: 34411650 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2021.145906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is becoming one of the deadliest disease in both developed as well as developing countries and continuous effort is being made to find innovative therapies for myriad types of cancers that afflict the human body. Therapeutic options for cancer have grown exponentially over the time but we are quite a way off from finding a magic bullet that can help cure cancer and based on the current evidence we may never find a catch all cure ever and it becomes crucial that we keep on innovating and find multiple ways to attack the menace of this dreaded disease. Many patients suffer recurrence of disease and require second-line or in some cases more than two lines of treatment. In this review article we have discussed the available therapies along with the newer advancements that have been made in cancer therapy. Latest developments in treatment of various cancers that have been discussed include gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9, theranostics, viral mediated therapy, artificial intelligence, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, etc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepti Malik
- Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, India
| | - Saniya Mahendiratta
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Harpinder Kaur
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Bikash Medhi
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Peters S, Merta J, Schmidt L, Jazmati D, Kramer PH, Blase C, Tippelt S, Fleischhack G, Stock A, Bison B, Rutkowski S, Pietsch T, Kortmann RD, Timmermann B. Evaluation of dose, volume and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:1193-1202. [PMID: 34964901 PMCID: PMC9248402 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) of ependymoma in children is an important part of the
interdisciplinary treatment concept. However, feasibility and dose concepts are still
under investigation, particularly in very young children. The aim of this study was to
evaluate the standard dose and volume of proton therapy (PT) in children with
ependymoma. Methods In this analysis, 105 patients with localized, intracranial ependymoma under the age of
18 years treated with PT between 2013 and 2018 were included. Patient characteristics,
treatment, outcome, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics,
Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Results The median age of patients at PT was 2.8 years (0.9-17.0 years). The molecular subgroup
analysis was performed in a subset of 50 patients (37 EP-PFA, 2 EP-PFB, 7 EP-RELA, 2
EP-YAP, 2 NEC [not elsewhere classified]). The median total dose was 59.4 Gy (54.0-62.0
Gy). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. The estimated 3-year overall survival
(OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 93.7%, 74.1%,
and 55.6%, respectively. Within univariable analysis, female gender and lower dose had a
positive impact on OS, whereas age ≥4 years had a negative impact on OS and PT given
after progression had a negative impact on PFS. In the multivariable analysis, multiple
tumor surgeries were associated with lower PFS. New ≥3° late toxicities occurred in 11
patients. Conclusion For children with localized ependymoma, PT was effective and well tolerable. Multiple
surgeries showed a negative impact on PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Peters
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Merta
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - L Schmidt
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D Jazmati
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P H Kramer
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - C Blase
- AnästhesieNetz Rhein-Ruhr, Westenfelder, Bochum, Germany
| | - S Tippelt
- Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - G Fleischhack
- Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - A Stock
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - B Bison
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - S Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Pietsch
- Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - R D Kortmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ). University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Childhood Malignant Brain Tumors: Balancing the Bench and Bedside. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236099. [PMID: 34885207 PMCID: PMC8656510 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Brain tumors remain the most common childhood solid tumors, accounting for approximately 25% of all pediatric cancers. They also represent the most common cause of cancer-related illness and death in this age group. Recent years have witnessed an evolution in our understanding of the biological underpinnings of many childhood brain tumors, potentially improving survival through both improved risk group allocation for patients to provide appropriate treatment intensity, and novel therapeutic breakthroughs. This review aims to summarize the molecular landscape, current trial-based standards of care, novel treatments being explored and future challenges for the three most common childhood malignant brain tumors—medulloblastomas, high-grade gliomas and ependymomas. Abstract Brain tumors are the leading cause of childhood cancer deaths in developed countries. They also represent the most common solid tumor in this age group, accounting for approximately one-quarter of all pediatric cancers. Developments in neuro-imaging, neurosurgical techniques, adjuvant therapy and supportive care have improved survival rates for certain tumors, allowing a future focus on optimizing cure, whilst minimizing long-term adverse effects. Recent times have witnessed a rapid evolution in the molecular characterization of several of the common pediatric brain tumors, allowing unique clinical and biological patient subgroups to be identified. However, a resulting paradigm shift in both translational therapy and subsequent survival for many of these tumors remains elusive, while recurrence remains a great clinical challenge. This review will provide an insight into the key molecular developments and global co-operative trial results for the most common malignant pediatric brain tumors (medulloblastoma, high-grade gliomas and ependymoma), highlighting potential future directions for management, including novel therapeutic options, and critical challenges that remain unsolved.
Collapse
|
21
|
Indelicato DJ, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Grippin AJ, Bradley JA, Mailhot Vega RB, Viviers E, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI, MacDonald SM. Bicentric Treatment Outcomes After Proton Therapy for Nonmyxopapillary High-Grade Spinal Cord Ependymoma in Children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:335-341. [PMID: 34597719 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies report outcomes in children treated with radiation for nonmyxopapillary ependymoma of the spinal cord, and little evidence exists to inform decisions regarding target volume and prescription dose. Moreover, virtually no mature outcome data exist on proton therapy for this tumor. We describe our combined institutional experience treating pediatric classical/anaplastic ependymoma of the spinal cord with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2008 and 2019, 14 pediatric patients with nonmetastatic nonmyxopapillary grade II (n = 6) and grade III (n = 8) spinal ependymoma received proton therapy. The median age at radiation was 14 years (range, 1.5-18 years). Five tumors arose within the cervical cord, 3 within the thoracic cord, and 6 within the lumbosacral cord. Before radiation therapy, 3 patients underwent subtotal resection, and 11 underwent gross-total or near total resection. Two patients received chemotherapy. For radiation, the clinical target volume received 50.4 Gy (n = 8), 52.2 (n = 1), or 54 Gy (n = 5), with the latter receiving a boost to the gross tumor volume after the initial 50.4 Gy, modified to respect spinal cord tolerance. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 1.5-14.8 years), no tumors progressed. Although most patients experienced neurologic sequela after surgery, only 1 developed additional neurologic deficits after radiation: An 18-year-old male who received 54 Gy after gross total resection of a lumbosacral tumor developed grade 2 erectile dysfunction. There were 2 cases of musculoskeletal toxicity attributable to surgery and radiation. At analysis, no patient had developed cardiac, pulmonary, or other visceral organ complications or a second malignancy. CONCLUSION Radiation to a total dose of 50 to 54 Gy can be safely delivered and plays a beneficial role in the multidisciplinary management of children with nonmyxopapillary spinal cord ependymoma. Proton therapy may reduce late radiation effects and is not associated with unexpected spinal cord toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam J Grippin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Emma Viviers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cosnarovici MM, Cosnarovici RV, Piciu D. Updates on the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Pediatric Tumors of the Central Nervous System - a systematic review. Med Pharm Rep 2021; 94:282-288. [PMID: 34430849 DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) represent the main cause of death through solid tumors in children and the second most frequent neoplasm in this patient group. The poor survival rate is due to many factors, such as the large diversity of morphological features, the particular micro-environmental characteristics of the nervous tissue, the relative rareness in relation to other childhood diseases, which leads to late diagnosis and the limited effectiveness of the available treatment options. Up until 2016, brain tumors were classified according to their histologic features. The new 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of CNS tumors incorporates molecular features, alongside the immunohistology, in order to provide a more accurate understanding of the disease. The treatment consists of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. We decided to review the literature on this pathology, in order to show the importance of the recent discoveries in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Doina Piciu
- Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,"Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shah S, Gates K, Mallory C, Rubens M, Maher OM, Niazi TN, Khatib Z, Kotecha R, Mehta MP, Hall MD. Effect of Postoperative Radiation Therapy Timing on Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Ependymoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100691. [PMID: 34409202 PMCID: PMC8360936 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used for World Health Organization grade II-III intracranial ependymoma. Clinicians generally aim to begin RT ≤5 weeks after surgery, but postoperative recovery and need for second look surgery can delay the initiation of adjuvant therapy. On ACNS 0831, patients were required to enroll ≤8 weeks after initial surgery and begin adjuvant therapy within 3 weeks after enrollment. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of RT after surgery. Methods and Materials The National Cancer Database was queried for patients (aged 1-39 years) with localized World Health Organization grade II-III intracranial ependymoma treated with surgery and postoperative RT. Overall survival (OS) curves were plotted based on RT timing (≤5 weeks, 5-8 weeks, and >8 weeks after surgery) and were compared by log-rank test. Factors associated with OS were identified by multivariate analysis. After 2009, complete data were available on whether patients underwent gross total resection or subtotal resection. Planned subset analysis was performed to examine the effect of RT timing on OS in patients with known extent of resection. Results In the final analytical data set of 1043 patients, no difference in 3-year OS was observed in patients who initiated RT ≤5 weeks, 5 to 8 weeks, and >8 weeks after surgery (89.8% vs 89.1% vs 88.4%; P = .796). On multivariate analysis, grade III tumors (hazard ratio, 2.752; 95% confidence interval, 1.969-3.846, P < .001) and subtotal resection (hazard ratio, 2.253; 95% confidence interval, 1.405-3.611, P < .001) were significantly associated with reduced OS. Timing of RT, total RT dose, age, and other factors were not significant. These findings were affirmed in the subset of patients treated between 2010 and 2016, when extent of resection was routinely recorded. Conclusions Delayed postoperative RT was not associated with inferior survival in patients with intracranial ependymoma. Delayed RT initiation may be acceptable in patients who require longer postoperative recovery or referral to an appropriate RT center, but should be minimized whenever practical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunny Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Kevin Gates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Chase Mallory
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Muni Rubens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Toba N Niazi
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Indelicato DJ, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Bradley JA, Mailhot-Vega RB, Morris CG, Tarbell NJ, Yock T, MacDonald SM. Proton Therapy for Pediatric Ependymoma: Mature Results From a Bicentric Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:815-820. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
26
|
Horendeck D, Walsh KD, Hirakawa H, Fujimori A, Kitamura H, Kato TA. High LET-Like Radiation Tracks at the Distal Side of Accelerated Proton Bragg Peak. Front Oncol 2021; 11:690042. [PMID: 34178687 PMCID: PMC8222778 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy is a type of hadron radiotherapy used for treating solid tumors. Unlike heavy charged elements, proton radiation is considered to be low LET (Linear Energy Transfer) radiation, like X-rays. However, the clinical SOBP (Spread Out Bragg Peak) proton radiation is considered to be higher in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) than both X-ray and their own entrance region. The RBE is estimated to be 1.1–1.2, which can be attributed to the higher LET at the SOBP region than at the entrance region. In order to clarify the nature of higher LET near the Bragg peak of proton radiation and its potential cytotoxic effects, we utilized a horizontal irradiation system with CHO cells. Additionally, we examined DNA repair mutants, analyzed cytotoxicity with colony formation, and assessed DNA damage and its repair with γ-H2AX foci assay in a high-resolution microscopic scale analysis along with the Bragg peak. Besides confirming that the most cytotoxic effects occurred at the Bragg peak, extended cytotoxicity was observed a few millimeters after the Bragg peak. γ-H2AX foci numbers reached a maximum at the Bragg peak and reduced dramatically after the Bragg peak. However, in the post-Bragg peak region, particle track-like structures were sporadically observed. This region contains foci that are more difficult to repair. The peak and post-Bragg peak regions contain rare high LET-like radiation tracks and can cause cellular lethality. This may have caused unwanted side effects and complexities of outputs for the proton therapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dakota Horendeck
- Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - Kade D Walsh
- Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| | - Hirokazu Hirakawa
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akira Fujimori
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hisashi Kitamura
- Radiation Emergency Medical Assistance Team, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takamitsu A Kato
- Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Baliga S, Gandola L, Timmermann B, Gail H, Padovani L, Janssens GO, Yock TI. Brain tumors: Medulloblastoma, ATRT, ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28395. [PMID: 32386126 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Children with medulloblastoma, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), and ependymoma are treated with a multidisciplinary approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Lower doses of craniospinal irradiation and tumor bed boost together with chemotherapy are the current standard of care for average-risk medulloblastoma in the Children's Oncology Group (COG). The International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) is examining the role of hyperfractionated craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy in high-risk patients. The recent stratification of medulloblastoma into specific molecular risk groups has prompted both COG and SIOP to reexamine the role of these modalities in these different risk groups to maximize cure rates and minimize long-term complications. Proton therapy has shown lower rates of neurocognitive and endocrine complications compared with photons. Ependymomas are treated with maximal surgical resection and adjuvant radiation therapy. The role of chemotherapy in ependymoma is currently being studied in both COG and SIOP. Likewise, for ATRT the role of different high-dose chemotherapy regimens together with local radiation therapy in infants, or craniospinal radiation in older children, is the current focus of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujith Baliga
- Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center-The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lorenza Gandola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Horan Gail
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laetitia Padovani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center and Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Patteson BE, Baliga S, Bajaj BVM, MacDonald SM, Yeap BY, Gallotto SL, Giblin MJ, Weyman EA, Ebb DH, Huang MS, Jones RM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Clinical outcomes in a large pediatric cohort of patients with ependymoma treated with proton radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:156-166. [PMID: 32514542 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for pediatric ependymoma includes surgical resection followed by local radiotherapy (RT). Proton RT (PRT) enables superior sparing of critical structures compared with photons, with potential to reduce late effects. We report mature outcomes, patterns of failure, and predictors of outcomes in patients treated with PRT. METHODS One hundred fifty patients (<22 y) with World Health Organization grades II/III ependymoma were treated with PRT between January 2001 and January 2019 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Demographic, tumor, and treatment-related characteristics were analyzed. Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and local control (LC) were assessed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 6.5 years. EFS, OS, and LC for the intracranial cohort (n = 145) at 7 years were 63.4%, 82.6%, and 76.1%. Fifty-one patients recurred: 26 (51.0%) local failures, 19 (37.3%) distant failures, and 6 (11.8%) synchronous failures. One hundred sixteen patients (77.3%) underwent gross total resection (GTR), 5 (3.3%) underwent near total resection (NTR), and 29 (19.3%) underwent subtotal resection (STR). EFS for the intracranial cohort at 7 years for GTR/NTR and STR was 70.3% and 35.2%. With multivariate analysis, the effect of tumor excision persisted after controlling for tumor location. There was no adverse effect on disease control if surgery to RT interval was within 9 weeks of GTR/NTR. CONCLUSION PRT is effective and safe in pediatric ependymoma. Similar to previous studies, GTR/NTR was the most important prognostic factor. Intervals up to 9 weeks from surgery to PRT did not compromise disease outcomes. There was no LC benefit between patients treated with >54 Gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE) versus ≤54 GyRBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke E Patteson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Benjamin V M Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Megan J Giblin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth A Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary S Huang
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robin M Jones
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Radiation-induced brain injury in patients with meningioma treated with proton or photon therapy. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:169-180. [PMID: 33886111 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03758-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation therapy is often used to treat meningioma with adverse features or when unresectable. Proton therapy has advantages over photon therapy in reducing integral dose to the brain. This study compared the incidence of radiological and clinical adverse events after photon versus proton therapy in the treatment of meningioma. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on patients with meningioma treated with proton or photon therapy at two high-volume tertiary cancer centers. Patients with a history of prior radiation therapy (RT) or less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Post-RT imaging changes were categorized into abnormal T2 signal intensities (T2 changes) or abnormal T1 post-contrast and T2 signal intensities (T1c+T2 changes) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical outcomes of adverse events and survival were compared between the proton and photon therapies. RESULTS Among the total of 77 patients, 38 patients received proton therapy and 39 patients received photon therapy. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years and median follow-up was 2.2 years. No significant differences in symptomatic adverse events were observed between the two groups: grade ≥ 2 adverse events were seen in 4 (10.5%) patients in the proton group and 3 (7.7%) patients in the photon group (p = 0.67). The 2-year cumulative incidences of T2 changes were 38.3% after proton therapy and 47.7% after photon therapy (p = 0.53) and the 2-year cumulative incidences of T1c+T2 changes were 26.8% after proton therapy and 5.3% after photon therapy (p = 0.02). One patient experienced grade ≥ 4 adverse event in each group (p = 0.99). Estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 79.5% (proton therapy 76.0% vs. photon therapy 81.3%, p = 0.66) and 2-year overall survival was 89.7% (proton therapy 86.6% vs. photon therapy 89.3%, p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS Following RT, high rates of T2 changes were seen in meningioma patients regardless of treatment modality. Proton therapy was associated with significantly higher rates of T1c+T2 changes compared with photon therapy, but severe adverse events were uncommon in both groups and survival outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Future studies will aim at correlating the MRI changes with models that can be incorporated into RT planning to avoid toxicity.
Collapse
|
30
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy for Infants with Brain Tumours: Experiences from the Prospective KiProReg Registry Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e295-e304. [PMID: 33820696 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Proton beam therapy (PBT) has increasingly been applied for the treatment of young children when radiotherapy is needed. The treatment requires intensive multimodality care and is logistically demanding. In this analysis, we evaluated our experiences in treating infants with tumours of the central nervous system with PBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Children younger than 2 years of age treated with PBT for central nervous system tumours enrolled in the prospective registry study KiProReg were retrospectively analysed. Information on patient characteristics, treatment, toxicities and outcome were evaluated. Adverse events were classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE V4.0) before, during and after PBT. RESULTS Between September 2013 and June 2018, 51 infants were eligible. The median age was 19 months (range 11-23 months) at the time of PBT. Tumour entities were ependymoma (51.0%), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumour (39.0%), high-grade glioma (6.0%), pineoblastoma (2.0%) and medulloblastoma (2.0%). The prescribed median total dose was 54.0 Gy (range 45.0-59.4 Gy). Most received local radiotherapy. In four patients, craniospinal irradiation followed by a boost to the local tumour bed was applied. The median follow-up time was 42.0 months (range 7.3-86.2 months). The estimated 3-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival rates for all patients were 62.7, 47.1 and 76.5%, respectively. During radiotherapy, 24 events of higher-grade (CTCAE ≥ °III) toxicities were reported. Interruption of radiotherapy for more than 2 days was due to infection (n = 3) or shunt complication (n = 2). Unexpected hospitalisation during radiotherapy affected 12 patients. Late adverse events attributable to radiotherapy included endocrinopathy (CTCAE °II; 7.8%), new onset of hearing loss (CTCAE °III; 5.8%) and visual impairment (CTCAE °IV; 1.9%). Transient radiation-induced imaging changes occurred in five patients (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that PBT is feasible for very young children with central nervous system tumours, at least in the short term. However, it requires challenging interdisciplinary medical care and high logistical effort. For evaluation of late effects, longer follow-up and evaluation of neurocognitive outcome are desirable. More data have to be gathered to further define the role of radiotherapy in infants over time.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lim PS, Tran S, Kroeze SGC, Pica A, Hrbacek J, Bachtiary B, Walser M, Leiser D, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Outcomes of adolescents and young adults treated for brain and skull base tumors with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28664. [PMID: 32881313 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of proton therapy (PT) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is becoming increasingly popular. This study aims to assess the outcomes and late toxicity consequences in AYAs (15-39 years) with brain/skull base tumors treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. METHODS One hundred seventy six AYAs treated curatively at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) were identified. Median age was 30 years (range 15-39) and median prescribed dose was 70.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) (range 50.4-76.0). The most common tumors treated were chordomas/chondrosarcomas (61.4%), followed by gliomas (15.3%), and meningiomas (14.2%). RESULTS After a median follow up of 66 months (range 12-236), 24 (13.6%) local only failures and one (0.6%) central nervous system (CNS) distant only failure were observed. The 6-year local control, distant progression-free survival, and overall survival were 83.2%, 97.4%, and 90.2%, respectively. The 6-year high-grade (≥grade [G] 3) PT-related late toxicity-free survival was 88.5%. Crude late toxicity rates were 26.2% G1, 37.8% G2, 12.2% G3, 0.6% G4, and 0.6% G5. The one G4 toxicity was a retinopathy and one G5 toxicity was a brainstem hemorrhage. The 6-year cumulative incidences for any late PT-related pituitary, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity were 36.3%, 18.3%, and 25.6%; whilst high-grade (≥G3) ototoxicity and neurotoxicity were 3.4% and 2.9%, respectively. No secondary malignancies were observed. The rate of unemployment was 9.5% pre-PT, increasing to 23.8% post-PT. Sixty-two percent of survivors were working whilst 12.7% were in education post-PT. CONCLUSIONS PT is an effective treatment for brain/skull base tumors in the AYA population with a reasonable late toxicity profile. Despite good clinical outcomes, around one in four AYA survivors are unemployed after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei S Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sébastien Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Klawinski D, Indelicato DJ, Hossain J, Sandler E. Surveillance imaging in pediatric ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28622. [PMID: 32743915 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of pediatric patients with ependymoma includes posttreatment surveillance imaging to identify asymptomatic recurrences. However, it is unclear whether early detection translates into improved survival. The objective was to determine whether detection of ependymoma relapses on surveillance imaging translates into a survival benefit. PROCEDURE Patients with ependymoma aged <21 years at diagnosis treated in the Nemours' Children's Health System between January 2003 and October 2016 underwent chart review. Relapsed patients' charts were assessed for details of initial therapy, surveillance imaging regimen, details of relapse including detection and therapy, and outcome. Median follow up of the entire cohort was 6.5 years from diagnosis and 3.5 years from relapse. RESULTS Ninety of 198 (45%) patients experienced relapse with 61 (68%) detected by surveillance imaging and 29 (32%) detected based on symptoms. Five-year OS in the surveillance group was 67% (confidence interval [CI] 55-82%, SE 0.1) versus 51% (CI 35-73%, SE 0.19) in the symptoms group (P = .073). From relapse, the 3-year OS in the surveillance group was 62% (CI 50-78%, SE 0.11) versus 55% (CI 39-76%, SE 0.17) in the symptoms group (P = .063) and the 3-year SPFS was 45% (CI 33-61%, SE 0.16) in the surveillance group versus 32% (CI 19-55%, SE 0.27) in the symptoms group (P = .028). CONCLUSION Surveillance imaging may identify recurrences in patients when they are more amenable to salvage therapy, resulting in superior 3-year SPFS, but given limited salvage options for children with recurrent ependymoma, the survival advantage of frequent surveillance imaging in asymptomatic patients remains ambiguous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Klawinski
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nemours Children's Specialty Care and Wolfson Children's Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jobayer Hossain
- Department of Statistics and Bioinformatics, A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Eric Sandler
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nemours Children's Specialty Care and Wolfson Children's Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bavle A, Srinivasan A, Choudhry F, Anderson M, Confer M, Simpson H, Gavula T, Thompson JS, Clifton S, Gross NL, McNall-Knapp R. Systematic review of the incidence and risk factors for cerebral vasculopathy and stroke after cranial proton and photon radiation for childhood brain tumors. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 8:31-39. [PMID: 33664967 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of our study is to determine the incidence, timing, and risk factors for cerebral vasculopathy after cranial proton and photon radiation for pediatric brain tumors. Methods We performed a single-institution retrospective review of a cohort of children treated with proton radiation for brain tumors. MRA and/or MRI were reviewed for evidence of cerebral vascular stenosis and infarcts. Twenty-one similar studies (17 photon, 4 proton) were identified by systematic literature review. Results For 81 patients with median follow-up of 3 years, the rates of overall and severe vasculopathy were 9.9% and 6.2% respectively, occurring a median of 2 years post radiation. Dose to optic chiasm greater than 45 Gy and suprasellar location were significant risk factors. Results were consistent with 4 prior proton studies (752 patients) that reported incidence of 5% to 6.7%, 1.5 to 3 years post radiation. With significantly longer follow-up (3.7-19 years), 9 studies (1108 patients) with traditional photon radiation reported a higher rate (6.3%-20%) and longer time to vasculopathy (2-28 years). Significant risk factors were neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1; rate 7.6%-60%) and suprasellar tumors (9%-20%). In 10 studies with photon radiation (1708 patients), the stroke rate was 2% to 18.8% (2.3-24 years post radiation). Conclusions Childhood brain tumor survivors need screening for vasculopathy after cranial radiation, especially with higher dose to optic chiasm, NF-1, and suprasellar tumors. Prospective studies are needed to identify risk groups, and ideal modality and timing, for screening of this toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Bavle
- Children's Blood and Cancer Center, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anand Srinivasan
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Farooq Choudhry
- Department of Radiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC) Oklahoma City, OK, US
| | | | | | - Hilarie Simpson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, US
| | - Theresa Gavula
- Department of Pediatrics, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, OK, US.,Jimmy Everest Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Oklahoma City, OK, US
| | | | | | - Naina L Gross
- Department of Neurosurgery, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, OK, US
| | - Rene McNall-Knapp
- Department of Pediatrics, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, OK, US.,Jimmy Everest Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Oklahoma City, OK, US
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Influence of Target Location, Size, and Patient Age on Normal Tissue Sparing- Proton and Photon Therapy in Paediatric Brain Tumour Patient-Specific Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092578. [PMID: 32927700 PMCID: PMC7563785 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy produces superior dose distributions compared to photon radiotherapy, reducing side effects. Differences between the two modalities are not fully quantified in paediatric patients for various intracranial tumour sites or age. Understanding these differences may help clinicians estimate the benefit and improve referral across available centres. Our aim was to compare intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) radiation doses for select paediatric intracranial tumours. METHODS IMPT and IMRT dose distributions for gender-matched paediatric cranial CT-datasets (ages 5, 9 and 13 years) were retrospectively calculated to simulate irradiation of supratentorial (ependymoma) and infratentorial (medulloblastoma) target volumes diameters (1-3 cm) and position (central and 1-2 cm shifts). RESULTS Clinical dosimetric objectives were achieved for all 216 treatment plans. Whilst infratentorial IMPT plans achieved greater maximum dose sparing to optic structures (4.8-12.6 Gy optic chiasm), brainstem sparing was limited (~0.5 Gy). Mean dose difference for optic chiasm was associated with medulloblastoma target position (p < 0.0197). Supratentorial IMPT plans demonstrated greater dose reduction for the youngest patients (pituitary gland p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Normal tissue sparing was achieved regardless of patient age for infratentorial tumours. However, for supratentorial tumours, there was a dosimetric advantage of IMPT across 9 vs. 13-year-old patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Upadhyaya SA, Robinson GW, Onar-Thomas A, Orr BA, Billups CA, Bowers DC, Bendel AE, Hassall T, Crawford JR, Partap S, Fisher PG, Tatevossian RG, Seah T, Qaddoumi IA, Vinitsky A, Armstrong GT, Sabin ND, Tinkle CL, Klimo P, Indelicato DJ, Boop FA, Merchant TE, Ellison DW, Gajjar A. Molecular grouping and outcomes of young children with newly diagnosed ependymoma treated on the multi-institutional SJYC07 trial. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:1319-1330. [PMID: 30976811 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This report documents the clinical characteristics, molecular grouping, and outcome of young children with ependymoma treated prospectively on a clinical trial. METHODS Fifty-four children (aged ≤3 y) with newly diagnosed ependymoma were treated on the St Jude Young Children 07 (SJYC07) trial with maximal safe surgical resection, 4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy, consolidation therapy using focal conformal radiation therapy (RT) (5-mm clinical target volume), and 6 months of oral maintenance chemotherapy. Molecular groups were determined by tumor DNA methylation using Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip and profiled on the German Cancer Research Center/Molecular Neuropathology 2.0 classifier. RESULTS One of the 54 study patients had metastases (cerebrospinal fluid positive) at diagnosis. Gross or near-total resection was achieved in 48 (89%) patients prior to RT. At a median follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 0.2-10.3 y), 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 75.1% ± 7.2%, and overall survival was 92.6% ± 4.4%. The molecular groups showed no significant difference in PFS (4-year estimates: posterior fossa ependymoma group A [PF-EPN-A; 42/54], 71.2% ± 8.3%; supratentorial ependymoma positive for v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A [ST-EPN-RELA; 8/54], 83.3% ± 17.0%; and supratentorial ependymoma positive for Yes-associated protein [4/54], 100%, P = 0.22). Subtotal resection prior to RT was associated with an inferior PFS compared with gross or near-total resection (4-year PFS: 41.7% ± 22.5% vs 79.0% ± 7.1%, P = 0.024), as was PF-EPN-A group with 1q gain (P = 0.05). Histopathologic grading was not associated with outcomes (classic vs anaplastic; P = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS In this prospectively treated cohort of young children with ependymoma, ST-EPN-RELA tumors had a more favorable outcome than reported from retrospective data. Histologic grade did not impact outcome. PF-EPN-A with 1q gain and subtotal resection were associated with inferior outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santhosh A Upadhyaya
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Giles W Robinson
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Arzu Onar-Thomas
- Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brent A Orr
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Catherine A Billups
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Daniel C Bowers
- Departments of Pediatrics and Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School/Children's Health, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anne E Bendel
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Tim Hassall
- Department of Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
| | - John R Crawford
- Department of Neurosciences and Pediatrics, University of California San Diego and Rady Childrens Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sonia Partap
- Department of Neurology & Division of Child Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Paul G Fisher
- Department of Neurology & Division of Child Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Ruth G Tatevossian
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Tiffany Seah
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, London, UK
| | - Ibrahim A Qaddoumi
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anna Vinitsky
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Noah D Sabin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher L Tinkle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Paul Klimo
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Danny J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Frederick A Boop
- Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - David W Ellison
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amar Gajjar
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Elsamadicy AA, Koo AB, David WB, Lee V, Zogg CK, Kundishora AJ, Hong CS, DeSpenza T, Reeves BC, Kahle KT, DiLuna M. Comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes in pediatric versus adult ependymoma. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa019. [PMID: 32642681 PMCID: PMC7212900 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mounting evidence supports the presence of heterogeneity in the presentation of ependymoma patients with respect to location, histopathology, and behavior between pediatric and adult patients. However, the influence of age on treatment outcomes in ependymoma remains obscure. Methods The SEER database years 1975–2016 were queried. Patients with a diagnosis of ependymoma were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition, coding system. Patients were classified into one of 4 age groups: children (age 0–12 years), adolescents (age 13–21 years), young adults (age 22–45 years), and older adults (age >45 years). The weighed multivariate analysis assessed the impact of age on survival outcomes following surgical treatment. Results There were a total of 6076 patients identified with ependymoma, of which 1111 (18%) were children, 529 (9%) were adolescents, 2039 (34%) were young adults, and 2397 (40%) were older adults. There were statistically significant differences between cohorts with respect to race (P < .001), anatomical location (P < .001), extent of resection (P < .001), radiation use (P < .001), tumor grade (P < .001), histological classification (P < .001), and all-cause mortality (P < .001). There was no significant difference between cohorts with respect to gender (P = .103). On multivariate logistic regression, factors associated with all-cause mortality rates included males (vs females), supratentorial location (vs spinal cord tumors), and radiation treatment (vs no radiation). Conclusions Our study using the SEER database demonstrates the various demographic and treatment risk factors that are associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality between the pediatric and adult populations following a diagnosis of ependymoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aladine A Elsamadicy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andrew B Koo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Wyatt B David
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Victor Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Cheryl K Zogg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Adam J Kundishora
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christopher S Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tyrone DeSpenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Benjamin C Reeves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kristopher T Kahle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael DiLuna
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to describe current advances in pediatric precision therapy through innovations in technology and engineering. A multimodal approach of chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation therapy has improved survival outcomes for pediatric cancer but with significant early and late toxicities. The pediatric population is particularly vulnerable given their age during treatment. Advances in precision interventions discussed include image guidance, ablation techniques, radiation therapy and novel drug delivery mechanisms that offer the potential for more targeted approach approaches with improved efficacy while limiting acute and late toxicities. RECENT FINDINGS Image-guidance provides improved treatment planning, real time monitoring and targeting when combined with ablative techniques and radiation therapy. Advances in drug delivery including radioisotopes, nanoparticles and antibody drug conjugates have shown benefit in adult malignancies with increasing use in pediatrics. These therapies alone and combined may lead to augmented local antitumor effect while sparing systemic exposure and potentially limiting early and late toxicities. SUMMARY Pediatric cancer medicine often requires a multimodal approach, each with early and late toxicities. Precision interventions and therapies offer promise for more targeted approaches in treating pediatric malignancies and require further investigation to determine long-term benefit.
Collapse
|
40
|
Seidel C, Dietzsch S, Kortmann RD, Schackert G, Hau P. Radiation Therapy in Ependymal Tumors. Radiat Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_4-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
41
|
Abstract
In pediatric brain tumors, the intensification of chemotherapy has allowed for a reduction in radiotherapy (RT) volume to an involved field approach, particularly in patients with medulloblastoma. For patients with low-grade gliomas, the trend has remained to delay RT with chemotherapy; however, when RT is used, typically smaller clinical target volume margins are used. For patients with extracranial tumors, intensive chemotherapy to address systemic disease with local control is considered standard. Proton beam therapy shows significant promise in addressing both short-term and long-term toxicities in both central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS pediatric tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, 30 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, 30 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ruangkanchanasetr R, Swangsilpa T, Puataweepong P, Dhanachai M, Hansasuta A, Boongird A, Sirachainan N, Hongeng S. Outcome of postoperative radiation therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma: a single-institution review. Childs Nerv Syst 2019; 35:1313-1321. [PMID: 31203397 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-019-04198-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcome of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in both new and recurrent grade II and III intracranial ependymomas in children treated at Ramathibodi Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2006 and 2017, 24 pediatric intracranial ependymomas treated with postoperative RT were retrospectively reviewed. The median age at diagnosis was 44.5 months (range, 4-165 months). There were 14 (58%) males. Fourteen (58%) patients had infratentorial tumor. The median maximal diameter of tumor at diagnosis was 4.45 cm (range, 2.2-10 cm). Fourteen (58%) patients had anaplastic tumor. Gross total resections were performed in 14 (58%) patients. The median prescribed dose was 54 Gy (range, 45-60 Gy). The median total treatment time was 43 days (range, 37-78 days). RESULTS The median clinical follow-up time was 44.5 months (range, 1-146 months). There were nine recurrences, five of which occurred at the primary tumor site. The estimated 5-year progression-free survival rate was 56%. The estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 75%. Extent of resection was the only factor associated with improved progression-free survival and overall survival after univariate testing. Six from nine patients with recurrent diseases underwent further surgery or further RT. These six patients had better median overall survival than the three who did not. Acute complication was mostly transient and tolerable. No late radiation effect was found. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative radiation is an effective treatment. GTR is associated with better PFS and OS. Aggressive salvage local treatments for recurrent patients can result in good overall survival. Longer follow-up is needed in account for late relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rawee Ruangkanchanasetr
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
| | - Thiti Swangsilpa
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Putipun Puataweepong
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Mantana Dhanachai
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Ake Hansasuta
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Atthaporn Boongird
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Nongnuch Sirachainan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Suradej Hongeng
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Breneman J, Laack NN, MacDonald S, Ermoian R, Baldini E. Pediatric Radiation Therapy—When Too Much Is Not Enough. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:963-966. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
45
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses the evidence base behind current and emerging strategies of management of intracranial and spinal ependymomas in children, with a particular focus on aspects of surgical techniques, challenges and complications. RECENT FINDINGS The cornerstone of management remains maximal safe resective surgery, which has repeatedly been shown to correlate with improved survival. This is followed by focal conformal radiotherapy, although good results using proton beam therapy, with the potential for diminished side effects, are emerging. The role of chemotherapy remains largely unproven for paediatric ependymoma. Despite optimal management strategies, many children with ependymoma suffer from tumour recurrence. The standard of care for paediatric ependymoma comprises surgery and radiotherapy. Results of ongoing clinical trials will help shape its management in order to leverage our increasingly sophisticated understanding of the genetic drivers behind these tumours into survival benefit for this challenging group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian M Toescu
- Developmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL-GOS Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Kristian Aquilina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ager BJ, Christensen MT, Burt LM, Poppe MM. The value of high-dose radiotherapy in intracranial ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27697. [PMID: 30865382 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy dose on overall survival (OS) after surgical resection for localized intracranial ependymoma. PROCEDURE The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients of all ages with intracranial WHO grade II to III ependymoma treated with surgery and 4500 to 7000 cGy of adjuvant radiotherapy. Pearson χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess clinicodemographic factors and patterns of care. After propensity-score matching, OS was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Of the 1153 patients meeting criteria, 529 (46%) received ≤ 5400 cGy and 624 (54%) received > 5400 cGy. At a median follow-up of 54.5 months, an OS benefit was observed for > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged 2-18 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.99, P = 0.047). No OS difference was found between ≤ 5400 cGy and > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged < 2 years (P = 0.819) or in adults (P = 0.180). Increasing age, WHO grade III, subtotal resection, and receipt of chemotherapy portended worse OS. Age 2 to 18 years, WHO III grade, supratentorial location, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receiving > 5400 cGy. CONCLUSION Adjuvant radiotherapy dose > 5400 cGy was associated with improved OS for children aged 2-18 years with WHO grade II-III intracranial ependymoma. No OS benefit was found with > 5400 cGy in adults or children less than two years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J Ager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Lindsay M Burt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Steinmeier T, Schulze Schleithoff S, Timmermann B. Evolving Radiotherapy Techniques in Paediatric Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:142-150. [PMID: 30639254 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Childhood cancer is rare and survival of childhood cancer has increased up to 80% at 5 years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy is an important element of the multimodal treatment concept. However, due to growing tissue, children are particularly sensitive to radiation-related side-effects and the induction of secondary malignancies. However, radiotherapy techniques have continuously progressed. In addition, modern treatment concepts have been improved in order to minimise long-term effects. Today, radiotherapy is used for various tumour types in childhood, such as sarcomas and tumours of the central nervous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS External beam therapy with either photons or protons and brachytherapy are predominantly used for the treatment of childhood tumours. Technical developments and features, as well as clinical outcomes, for several tumour entities are presented. RESULTS The development of radiotherapy techniques, as well as risk-adapted therapy concepts, resulted in promising outcome regarding tumour control, survival and therapy-related side-effects. It is assumed that proton therapy will be increasingly used for treating children in the future. However, more data have to be collected through multi-institutional registries in order to strengthen the evidence. CONCLUSION The development of radiotherapy techniques is beneficial for children in terms of reducing dose exposure. As compared with other modern and highly conformal techniques, particularly proton therapy may achieve high survival rates and tumour control rates while decreasing the risk for side-effects. However, clinical evidence for modern radiotherapy techniques is still limited today. An optimal patient triaging with the selection of the most appropriate radiation technique for each individual patient will be an important goal for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Steinmeier
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - S Schulze Schleithoff
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Thorp N, Gandola L. Management of Ependymoma in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:162-170. [PMID: 30616927 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Paediatric ependymomas are rare, malignant tumours arising throughout the central nervous system, but most frequently (in children) the posterior fossa. The standard of care for localised disease is gross total resection and focal radiotherapy, resulting in overall survival rates of up to 85%. Despite improvements in survival, treatment remains challenging, with persistently high rates of (rarely curable) relapse alongside risks of significant tumour and treatment-related toxicity. Systemic therapy is currently used to delay radiotherapy in very young children and in the management of metastatic or recurrent disease. Its use in the adjuvant setting is the subject of ongoing studies. Current research efforts are aimed at eliciting a better understanding of molecular biology, correlating this with tumour behaviour and defining targets for potential new agents. Prognosis seems to be related to the extent of surgical resection and the age at presentation. This article reviews clinical aspects of ependymoma management in children and young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Thorp
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
| | - L Gandola
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Khatua S, Mangum R, Bertrand KC, Zaky W, McCall D, Mack SC. Pediatric ependymoma: current treatment and newer therapeutic insights. Future Oncol 2018; 14:3175-3186. [PMID: 30418040 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling now identifies pediatric ependymoma as a defined biological entity. Molecular interrogation has segregated these tumors into distinct biological subtypes based on anatomical location, age and clinical outcome, which now defines the need to tailor therapy even for histologically similar tumors. These findings now provide reasons for a paradigm shift in therapy, which should profile future clinical trials focused on targeted therapeutic strategies and risk-based treatment. The need to diagnose and differentiate the aggressive variants, which include the posterior fossa group A and the supratentorial RELA fusion subtypes, is imperative to escalate therapy and improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumen Khatua
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ross Mangum
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Texas Children's Cancer & Hematology Centers, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelsey C Bertrand
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Texas Children's Cancer & Hematology Centers, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wafik Zaky
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David McCall
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Stephen C Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Texas Children's Cancer & Hematology Centers, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Deng X, Lin D, Yu L, Xu X, Zhang N, Zhou H, Sheng H, Yin B, Lin F, Xu S, Li D, Fang J, Lu X, Lin J. The role of postoperative radiotherapy in pediatric patients with grade II intracranial ependymomas: a population-based, propensity score-matched study. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:5515-5524. [PMID: 30519099 PMCID: PMC6233483 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s181900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The main objectives of this study were to clarify the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for pediatric intracranial grade II ependymomas (EPNs) and to explore whether various characteristics are associated with different outcomes in patients with and without PORT. Patients and methods Data from patients younger than 18 years diagnosed with grade II intracranial EPNs and treated by surgery, with or without PORT, were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973–2013 data set). Propensity score-matched analysis was conducted to balance clinical variables. Patient characteristics were stratified and analyzed. Results In total, data from 632 patients with grade II EPNs treated by cancer-directed surgery with or without PORT were obtained from the SEER database. Multivariable Cox analysis in the matched cohort suggested that undergoing PORT (overall survival [OS], P=0.020; cancer-specific survival [CSS], P=0.031), undergoing gross total resection (GTR; subtotal resection [STR] vs GTR; OS, P<0.001; CSS, P<0.001), and older age (OS, P<0.001; CSS, P<0.001) were the independent predictors of superior prognosis. Stratified analysis demonstrated that patient characteristics, including infratentorial location, younger age, and STR, were associated with benefit from PORT, while the survival advantage was not detected in patients who underwent GTR. Conclusion Propensity score-matched analysis using SEER data indicates survival advantages of PORT. Given the strong prognostic associations with extent of resection and patient age, we recommend PORT for younger patients treated by STR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyang Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Dongdong Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Lisheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Xingxing Xu
- Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Nu Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Hui Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Hansong Sheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Bo Yin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Fengchun Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Shangyu Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Dandong Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Junhao Fang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Xiangqi Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| | - Jian Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,
| |
Collapse
|