Ultrabilitation: beyond recovery-oriented rehabilitation

Efficacy of the Rehabilitation Planning Consult for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Survivors of head and neck cancer may have significant lasting impairments and poor access to rehabilitation. To address this, our group developed and evaluated a rehabilitation planning consult (RPC). The RPC is conducted through an initial consultation and a single follow-up session with a rehabilitation professional. During the initial consultation, rehabilitation needs are determined and the survivor sets individualized goals and plans. They then implement their plans independently and are facilitated to evaluate and modify plans as necessary during the follow-up session.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used a waitlist control design to compare the proportion of participants attaining a minimally importantly different change in quality of life (QOL) on the Short Form 36 Physical Health Summary Score from baseline to 3 months after study enrollment, between patients randomized to receive (n = 77) or wait 14 ± 3 weeks to receive (n = 76) the RPC. Additional outcomes included goal attainment indicators measured using the Brief Rehabilitation Assessment for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer (BRASH).

RESULTS

Of 153 participants recruited, 95 (62%) completed the intervention; 57 were in the immediate (RPC) group and 38 were in the waiting list control (WLC) group. No significant between-group differences were seen in the proportion of patients achieving a minimally important improvement (2.5 units) on the Physical Health Summary Score from baseline to 3 months after recruitment. No between-group differences were seen on any secondary QOL indicators. Among the 67 (RPC n = 42, WLC n = 22) participants who set individualized rehabilitation goals, BRASH scores on goal performance and satisfaction with goal performance were significantly better in the RPC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the RPC may provide benefit in patients' individualized domains of choice among those who set goals, without affecting overall QOL. Future work could refine the subset of patients who benefit and explore the optimal timing and intensity of the intervention.

Psychometric properties of the client-centred rehabilitation questionnaire-is derived from a large and varied group of rehabilitation users

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to inspect and establish the factor structure of the Icelandic Client-Centred Rehabilitation Questionnaire [CCRQ-is] and investigate the service experiences of a large and varied sample of rehabilitation users.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Altogether 499 rehabilitation users completed the questionnaire. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis was conducted for analysis of items. Mann-Whitney's U and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare subscale responses based on participants' characteristics.

RESULTS

Four factors explained 53,2% of the variance: Respect and attentiveness, Interaction with significant others, Responsiveness to needs and preferences and Education and enablement. Subscales showed internal consistency from 0.72-0.91 and 0.92 for the whole instrument. The subscale Respect and attentiveness represented user centred rehabilitation the most and Interaction with significant others the least. Significant differences in relation to health conditions and age were obtained on all four subscales and differences by gender on one subscale.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the CCRQ-is is a reliable tool that can be used with rehabilitation users with a broad range of characteristics within the Icelandic context. The extent to which the intersection of age, gender and health issues influence users' perception of services needs to be further scrutinized.

Breast Cancer: How Hippotherapy Bridges the Gap between Healing and Recovery-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed women's cancer, and has a high survival rate. Despite great progress in detection and treatment, life reconstruction requires comprehensive cross-sectoral approaches between different disciplines and deeper consideration of the patient's challenges. Hippotherapy is an emerging specialized rehabilitation approach, performed by accredited health professionals and equine specialists, on specially trained horses via their movement, activating major paths for physical, mental, psychic and social reinforcement, and is synergistic to rehabilitative and supportive care.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized open, prospective, two-armed, controlled trial on the effectiveness of hippotherapy versus conventional supportive care on adult women with a diagnosis of breast cancer, after the period of primary treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy). The 6-month program included, in the treated group, an initial 1-week daily hippotherapy session, followed by three short 2-day sessions with an interval of 2 months between each, where the patients received conventional supportive care. The control group received 6 months of conventional supportive care. The primary end point was quality of life. Cognitive performances, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and body image were the secondary end points. Measurements were done through self-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS

We observed statistical differences in the evolution of the measured parameters over time between the two groups. The hippotherapy group showed a much faster, favorable and continuous improvement until the end of the program for each function assessed. The most striking improvements were observed in global quality of life, and fatigue, while breast cancer-specific quality of life, cognitive performance, anxiety and depression and body image showed a less marked but still statistically significant difference at the final post-treatment evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the therapeutic relevance of hippotherapy, a one-health approach, as a key initial stage after cancer diagnosis and treatment to foster recovery. Furthermore, hippotherapy has a strong impact on cancer treatments' efficiency and reconstruction of patient's life and ecosystem. This work reveals a layer of complexity that needs to be broadly considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClincalTrials.gov NCT04350398 accessed on 1 January 2022. Registered 17 April 2020, retrospectively registered; French Clinical Trials in Cancer Register RECF3818. Registered 18 March 2019, retrospectively registered.

The unexpected other: Challenges and strategies after acquired impairment

People experiencing traumatic brain injury or multitrauma will often live with problems in functioning for a profound period in life. A situation of great complexity emerges involving both the experience of an impaired body and the experience of a changed social position. This article addresses the intricate relations between the altered body, personal ambitions, and social surroundings in the first 2-3 years after an injury. The conceptual framework centers around the process of change, applying concepts such as the unexpected other and biographical reconstruction. Twenty-one people of working age were interviewed two times. All interviewees had experienced traumatic brain injury or multitrauma. A thematic narrative analysis was applied. Consequences of the injury took place at a carnal level where fatigue is something completely different from becoming exhausted and where elimination of body waste takes place through practices novel to the injured person. Living with impairment also took place at the level of social interaction. Here, family relations, shame, and establishing a new identity seemed profoundly important. This article makes two novel contributions. First, it emphasizes more than previous studies do that the daily management of altered body functions is more important for independence and wellbeing. Second, the article identifies the narrative about the accident as an important issue for injured people to settle.

"Cured" but not "healed": The application of principles of palliative care to cancer survivorship

Application of principles of palliative care to the concept of survivorship may serve to establish an interdisciplinary approach to guide those treated for cancer through the experience of being "cured" but not "healed". Valuable lessons may be garnered from palliative care if its principles are considered within the context of survivorship. This work aims to define key terms including cured, healed, survivorship, and quality of life (QoL) and delineate the central tenets of palliative care and disease-modifying care. Since pursuit of a cure tends to dominate provision of oncological care, Western society's prevailing death denying attitudes often equate to the prioritization of advanced medial treatment to postpone death. Accordingly, the "modern paradox" of medicine (Cassell, 2004) is examined in consideration of the suffering that often results from advanced medical treatment that is intended to alleviate the cause of suffering and ultimately, "deny" death. However, owing to the profound consequences of advanced medical treatment and the associated losses of function concomitant with cancer, there is an apparent need for a framework of care that attends to these survivorship issues. When the experience of being cured but not healed is articulated through a theoretical discussion of liminality and the "remission society" (Frank, 1995), the applicability of palliative care to survivorship care becomes apparent. By embracing principles of palliative care, survivorship care may be guided by a theoretical foundation that provides cancer survivors with care that supports increased QoL, biopsychosocial symptom management, and a holistic perspective of the illness experience. Accordingly, application of palliative care to survivorship may establish congruence between notions of cured and healed.

New perspectives on person-centered care: an affordance-based account

Despite the growing interest and supporting evidence for person-centered care (PCC), there is still a fundamental disagreement about what makes healthcare person-centered. In this article, we define PCC as operating with three fundamental conditions: personal, participatory and holistic. To further understand these concepts, we develop a framework based on the theory of affordances, which we apply to the healthcare case of rehabilitation and a concrete experiment on social interactions between persons with cerebral palsy and physio- and occupational therapists. Based on the application of the theory, we argue that in order for healthcare to be considered as PCC, professionals need to adopt a personalistic attitude in their care, defined (at the how-level) in terms of mutual affordances: how the professional and the person of care acknowledges each other as a person in an interaction. In opposition, we define (at the what level) the functionalistic attitude in terms of object affordances, those related to a concrete goal. We show that PCC requires a balance of personalistic and functionalistic attitudes, since this contributes to a participatory and holistic conception of, and interaction with, the person of care.

Paradoxes in rehabilitation

Paradoxical enhancement and paradoxical recovery of function after brain injury harmonize well with the concept of "ultrabilitation" and its focus on novel forms of flourishing in rehabilitation settings. I consider three sets of paradoxes which may impact on brain injury rehabilitation. Firstly, I consider post-traumatic growth after brain injury and its key determinants. Secondly, I review the role of illusions in rehabilitation and the paradox that some clinical conditions may be improved by invoking perceptual distortions. Thirdly, I consider paradoxical recovery profiles after brain injury, since knowledge of such paradoxical profiles may help inform attempts at rehabilitation of some patients. Finally, I consider how some of these paradoxes relate to components of ultrabilitation, and in addition to the nascent field of positive neuropsychology and the concept of resilience after brain injury.Implications for rehabilitationIllusions can sometimes be harnessed as a therapeutic tool in rehabilitation.There may be spontaneous, positive outcomes of an injury or illness, in the form of "post-traumatic growth", and these should be considered as part of a holistic therapeutic approach in rehabilitation.Some patients make an exceptional recovery from a severe brain insult, and lessons could be learned from such cases, such as disciplined use of compensatory strategies, which could have broader implications for neurorehabilitation.

Rehabilitation culture and its impact on technology: unpacking practical conditions for ultrabilitation

Purpose: It has been proposed that rehabilitation practice expand its aims beyond recovery to "ultrabilitation," but only if certain biological, technological, and psychosocial conditions are met. There is thus an opportunity to connect ultrabilitation, as a concept, to adjacent literature on assistive technology and sociotechnical systems.Method: We draw on insights from sociology of technology and responsible innovation, as well as concrete examples of neural devices and the culture of rehabilitation practice, to further refine our understanding of the conditions of possibility for ultrabilitation.Results: "Assistive" technologies can indeed be re-imagined as "ultrabilitative," but this shift is both psychosocial and technological in nature, such that rehabilitation professionals will likely play a key role in this shift. There is not, however, sufficient evidence to suggest whether they will support or hinder ultrabilitative uses of technology.Conclusion: Advancing the idea and project of ultrabilitation must be grounded in a nuanced understanding of actual rehabilitation practice and the norms of broader society, which can be gained from engaging with adjacent literatures and by conducting further research on technology use in rehabilitation contexts.Implications for rehabilitation"Assistive" technologies can be conceptually re-imagined as "ultrabilitative" technologies, expanding their utility from recovery to enhancement and flourishing.Actual development and use of ultrabilitative technology is both a technical and psychosocial challenge, and its success depends on the cultural context in which technology is situated.Further empirical research is needed on the ways in which rehabilitation culture and the norms of broader society might impact or even inhibit the use of ultrabilitative technology.

Impact of robotics and human enhancement on occupation: what does it mean for rehabilitation?

Purpose: People with disabilities face participation challenges in all occupations. Scientific and technological advancements impact the occupational landscape of humans. This scoping review aimed to ascertain the academic engagement with occupation in relation to robotics and human enhancement focusing in particular on how people with disabilities and rehabilitation were mentioned.Method: SCOPUS and the 70 databases of EBSCO host were searched. Manifest and latent content coding and thematic grouping of codes relevant to answering the review questions was performed.Results: Only four articles engaged with occupation in relation to human enhancement. As to occupation and robotics, some occupational fields were visible and not others; occupational health and safety was the most visible one; people with disabilities were covered from a medical, therapeutic angle and not in relation to social issues caused by the occupational impact of robotics. Change in the scope, meaning, and clients of rehabilitation efforts related to occupation enabled by human enhancement and robotics was not covered.Conclusions: The gaps found should be filled. The impact of robotics and human enhancement on the occupational landscape indicates the need for rehabilitation to think beyond recovery to the species typical as a goal. The ultrabilitation concept could help to meet this need.Implications for rehabilitationAdvances in robotics and human enhancement beyond species-typical levels modify the occupational landscape, human ability expectations in this setting, and the meaning and scope of disability and rehabilitation (clinical and community based).There is a need to elucidate the impact of these changes on the meaning, scope and goals of recovery-oriented rehabilitation.The recently coined term "ultrabilitation" creates space to discuss an ability expectation creep triggered by developments in robotics and human enhancement, particularly within occupation focused rehabilitation.