Survival after operations for ischaemic bowel disease

Histological Evaluation of Resected Tissue as a Predictor of Survival in Horses with Strangulating Small Intestinal Disease

Strangulating small intestinal disease (SSID) in horses carries a poor prognosis for survival, especially following resection of ischaemic tissue. The margins of a resection are principally based on visual appraisal of the intestine during surgery. We hypothesized that histological evaluation of resected tissue may identify occult changes indicative of prognosis. Small intestinal samples from 18 horses undergoing resection for SSID and 9 horses euthanised for reasons unrelated to gastrointestinal pathology were utilised. Histological appearance was used to generate a 'total damage score' (TDS) for the control tissue, grossly normal tissue at oral and aboral extremities (sections OR1 and AB1) of the resected intestine, and oral and aboral extremities of visually abnormal tissue (sections OR2 and AB2) from SSID horses. The relationship between TDS and long-term post-operative survival was investigated. TDS was not different between control tissues and OR1 and AB1 sections. Five surgical cases were alive at follow-up, the longest follow-up time being 2561 days. Based on the median scores for SSID cases versus controls, cut-off values were generated to evaluate post-operative survival versus TDS. Only OR2 TDS was significantly associated with survival, with a higher (worse) score indicating longer survival. More severe tissue insult may expedite rapid progression to surgery, improving post-operative outcomes.

Radiological predictive factors of transmural intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric ischemia: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Transmural intestinal necrosis (TIN) is related to high mortality in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). Radiological predictive factors of TIN in AMI remains controversial. This study aimed to identify the CT-based predictive factors of TIN in AMI.

METHODS

EMBASE and PUBMED were searched for publications predicting TIN using radiological features. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to assess the methodological quality of individual studies. Data were presented in terms of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence interval (CI). The random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 1037 cases with AMI were considered. The meta-analysis showed that bowel wall thinning (DOR = 13.10; 95% CI: 3.71, 46.25), decreased or absent bowel wall enhancement (DOR = 5.77; 95% CI: 2.95, 11.30), bowel dilation (DOR = 3.23; 95% CI: 2.03, 5.15), pneumatosis intestinalis (DOR = 5.78; 95% CI: 2.24, 14.95), porto-mesenteric venous gas (DOR = 5.36; 95% CI: 2.14, 13.40), and arterial occlusive AMI (DOR = 2.66; 95% CI: 1.53, 4.63) were risk factors for predicting TIN. Bowel wall thinning and porto-mesenteric venous gas displayed high specificity to diagnose TIN (98%, 95%, respectively). The subgroup analysis showed that decreased or absent bowel wall enhancement (DOR = 8.23; 95% CI: 4.67, 14.51) and bowel dilation (DOR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.55, 6.39) were predictors of TIN in venous occlusive AMI, which were not related to TIN in arterial-origin AMI.

CONCLUSIONS

For predicting TIN, there are specific radiological features. The radiological predictors of TIN may differ according to the various causes of AMI. Future primary studies should further evaluate the relationships between radiological signs and TIN based on different etiologies.

KEY POINTS

• Bowel wall thinning, decreased or absent bowel wall enhancement, bowel dilation, pneumatosis intestinalis, porto-mesenteric venous gas, and arterial occlusive AMI were risk factors for predicting TIN. • Decreased or absent bowel wall enhancement and bowel dilation were predictors of TIN in venous occlusive AMI, which were not related to TIN in arterial-origin AMI.

Role of spleen density in predicting postoperative complications in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia

BACKGROUND

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening surgical emergency with a poor prognosis. This study assessed the association of diffuse reduction of spleen density (DROSD) with postoperative complications and identified risk factors for adverse outcomes in AMI patients after surgery.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with AMI and underwent surgical operations between April 2006 and July 2021 were enrolled. Spleen density was assessed using preoperative non-enhanced computed tomography. The lowest quartile of spleen density in all patients was regarded as the cutoff value for DROSD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors related to postoperative outcomes after surgery.

RESULTS

According to the diagnostic cutoff, patients with a spleen density ≤49.07 HU were defined as DROSD. In a cohort of 97 patients, 34.0% developed complications within 30 days of surgery. The multivariate analysis illustrated that DROSD was an independent risk factor for prognostic outcomes in AMI patients after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients with low spleen density were prone to postoperative complications. As an imaging method, preoperative assessment of spleen density is a novel predictor that can be used clinically to identify high-risk AMI patients with poor prognosis.

Infarcts and ischemia in the abdomen: an imaging perspective with an emphasis on cross-sectional imaging findings

Infarcts and ischemia of abdominal organs may present with acute abdominal pain, and early diagnosis is crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, some of these patients present in poor clinical conditions to the emergency department, and imaging specialists are crucial for optimal outcomes. Although the radiological diagnosis of abdominal infarcts is often straightforward, it is vital to use the appropriate imaging modalities and correct imaging techniques for their detection. Additionally, some non-infarct-related abdominal pathologies may mimic infarcts, cause diagnostic confusion, and result in delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. In this article, we aimed to outline the general imaging approach, present cross-sectional imaging findings of infarcts and ischemia in several abdominal organs, including but not limited to, liver, spleen, kidneys, adrenals, omentum, and intestinal segments with relevant vascular anatomy, discuss possible differential diagnoses and emphasize important clinical/radiological clues that may assist radiologists in the diagnostic process.

Immediate postoperative parenteral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mesenteric ischemia after intestinal resection: a retrospective cohort study at a single institute

BACKGROUND

Bowel gangrene represents a major fatal event in acute mesenteric ischemia. Intestinal resection is inevitable in patients with peritonitis and bowel gangrene. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the benefit of postoperative parenteral anticoagulation in patients with intestinal resection.

METHODS

Patients with acute mesenteric ischemia and bowel gangrene were recruited retrospectively between January 2007 and December 2019. All patients underwent bowel resection. They were categorized into two groups: patients without immediate parenteral anticoagulant therapy (Group A) and those with immediate parenteral anticoagulant therapy (Group B). Thirty-day mortality and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were included, with 29 patients in Group A and 56 patients in Group B. Patients in Group B had lower 30-day mortality (16.1%) and a higher 2-year survival rate (45.4%) than patients in Group A (30-day mortality: 51.7%, p = 0.001; 2-year survival rate: 19.0%, p = 0.001). In the 30-day mortality multivariate analysis, patients in Group B had a better outcome (odds ratio = 0.080, 95% confidence interval between 0.011 and 0.605, p = 0.014). Patients in Group B also had a better outcome in the survival multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.435, 95% confidence interval between 0.213 and 0.887, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate postoperative parenteral anticoagulant therapy improves prognosis in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia treated by intestinal resection. Trial registration This research was retrospectively approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) I&II of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH-IRB No.CE21256B) on July 28th, 2021. The informed consent waiver was also approved by IRB I&II of Taichung Veterans General Hospital. The Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP guidelines were followed during this study.

High risk and low prevalence diseases: Mesenteric ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Mesenteric ischemia is a rare, frequently misdiagnosed, serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of mesenteric ischemia, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

Mesenteric ischemia is an abdominal vascular emergency that includes superior mesenteric arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, venous mesenteric ischemia, and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. It is associated with a variety of risk factors including older age, cardiovascular disease, hypercoagulable state, and end-stage renal disease. The presentation depends on the underlying pathophysiology. While arterial embolic disease may present with sudden, severe pain, the early stages of the disease and other forms can present with vague symptoms, including generalized abdominal pain, weight loss, vomiting, and diarrhea. Laboratory testing can suggest the disease with leukocytosis and elevated lactate, but normal values should not be used to exclude the diagnosis. The imaging modality of choice is triple phase computed tomography with non-contrast, arterial, and delayed phases. The initial ED management includes fluid resuscitation, symptomatic therapy, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and anticoagulation. Emergent consultation with a multidisciplinary team including diagnostic and interventional radiologists and cardiovascular and general surgeons is necessary for definitive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of mesenteric ischemia can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this disease.

Potential for intestinal transplantation after acute mesenteric ischemia in patients aged less than 70 years: A population-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) has a high mortality rate due to the development of bowel necrosis. Patients are often ruled outside active care if a large proportion of small bowel is necrotic. With the development of treatment for short bowel syndrome (SBS) and intestinal transplantation methods, long-term survival is possible even after extensive small bowel resections. This study aims to assess the incidence of SBS and potentially suitable candidates for intestinal transplantation among patients treated for AMI.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective study comprised patients aged less than 70 years and diagnosed with AMI between January 2006 and October 2020 in Helsinki and Uusimaa health care district, Finland.

RESULTS

Altogether, AMI was diagnosed in 711 patients, of whom 133 (19%) were aged below 70. An intervention was performed in 110 (83%) patients. Of these 133 patients, 16 (12%) were ruled outside active treatment due to extensive small bowel necrosis at exploratory laparotomy, of whom 6 (5%) were potentially suitable for intestinal transplantation. Two patients were considered as potential candidates for intestinal transplantation at bowel resection but died of AMI. Nine (7%) patients needed parenteral nutrition after resection, and two of them (2%) developed SBS. Only one patient needed long-term parenteral nutrition after hospital discharge. This patient remained dependent on parenteral nutrition but died before evaluation of intestinal transplantation could be carried out while the other patient was able to return to enteral nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

A small number of patients with AMI below 70 years of age are potentially eligible for intestinal transplantation.

Are the conventional scoring systems efficient in predicting mortality of acute mesenteric ischemia?: Mortality estimation in patients with AMI

Acute mesenteric ischemia is a surgical emergency with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, it is important to determine the prognosis for this disease. In the present study, we aimed to compare the prediction accuracy of 3 scoring systems: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, sequential organ failure assessment score and simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II). The retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university hospital. Eighty-two acute mesenteric ischemia patients were evaluated retrospectively. The mortality prediction abilities of the scoring systems were evaluated by comparing the prediction rates of > 10%, 30% and 50% and the actual mortality among survivors and non-survivors in pairs. Predicted mortality rates among survivors and non-survivors differed among the 3 classification systems. The mortality estimates of the SAPS II were closer to the actual mortality rates. Analysis of the estimated mortality rates as mortality risk limits showed that acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II was superior to sequential organ failure assessment score and SAPS II in estimating mortality rates, whereas SAPS II was more successful in detecting survivors. The estimated mortality rates of the 3 rating systems, the estimated mortality rates were higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. The accuracy of the SAPS II in determining prognosis was relatively better.

Treatment of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: Individual Challenges for Interventional Radiologists and Abdominal Surgeons

Background: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening condition resulting from occlusion of the mesenteric arterial vessels. AMI requires immediate treatment with revascularization of the occluded vessels. Purpose: to evaluate the technical success, clinical outcomes and survival of patients receiving endovascular treatment for AMI followed by surgery. Material and Methods: A search of our institution’s database for AMI revealed 149 potential patients between 08/2016 and 08/2021, of which 91 were excluded due to incomplete clinical data, insufficient imaging or missing follow-up laparoscopy. The final cohort included 58 consecutive patients [(median age 73.5 years [range: 43−96 years], 55% female), median BMI 26.2 kg/m2 (range:16.0−39.2 kg/m2)]. Periinterventional imaging regarding the cause of AMI (acute-embolic or acute-on-chronic) was evaluated by two radiologists in consensus. The extent of AMI and the degree of technical success was graded according to a modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale) score (TICI-AMI) classification (0: no perfusion; 1: minimal; 2a < 50% filling; 2b > 50%; 2c: near complete or slow; 3: complete). Lab data and clinical data were collected, including the results of follow-up laparoscopy. Non-parametric statistics were used. Results: All interventions were considered technically successful. The most common causes of AMI were emboli (51.7%) and acute-on-chronic thrombotic occlusions (37.9%). Initial imaging showed a TICI-AMI score of 0, 1 or 2a in 87.9% (n = 51) of patients. Post-therapeutic TICI-AMI scores improved significantly with 87.9% of patients grade 2b and better. Median lactate levels reduced from 2.7 (IQR 2.0−3.7) mg/dL (1−18) to 1.45 (IQR 0.99−1.90). Intestinal ischemia was documented in 79.1% of cases with resection of the infarcted intestinal loops. In total, 22/58 (37.9%) patients died during the first 30 days after intervention and surgery. According to CIRSE criteria, we did not observe any SAE scores of grade 2 or higher. Conclusions: AMI is a serious disease with high lethality within the first 30 days despite optimal treatment. However, interventional revascularization before surgery with resection of the infarcted bowel can save two out of three of critically ill patients.

Basic demographic characteristics and prevalence of comorbidities in acute mesenteric ischemia: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine and assess the basic demographic characteristics and prevalence of comorbidities in acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and its various subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted by using the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar (to June 1, 2022). Random-effects or fixed-effects models were selected to pool means and proportions and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on heterogeneity between studies. The results of meta-analyses for basic demographic characteristics and prevalence (proportions) of each specific comorbidities of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and its various subtypes were described.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 17,103 patients with AMI. Furthermore, 7941 patients with subclass diagnoses of AMI were identified, including 3,239 patients with arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia (AOMI), 2,977 patients with nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), and 1,725 patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT). As a surgical emergency, AMI is associated with older patients and a high likelihood of multisystem comorbidities. Comorbidities of AMI involved multiple systemic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, endocrine and metabolic diseases, kidney diseases, digestive diseases, respiratory diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, vascular diseases, and cancer.

CONCLUSION

The basic demographic characteristics and the prevalence of comorbidities of different subtypes of AMI are different. The management of comorbidities should be an essential part of improving the prognosis of AMI patients and may contribute to precise prevention of AMI.

Incidence and outcomes of acute mesenteric ischaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI), proportions of its different forms and short-term and long-term mortality.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched until 26 July 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting data on the incidence and outcomes of AMI in adult populations.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and quality assessment with modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale were performed using predeveloped standard forms. The outcomes were the incidence of AMI and its different forms in the general population and in patients admitted to hospital, and the mortality of AMI in its different forms.

RESULTS

From 3064 records, 335 full texts were reviewed and 163 included in the quantitative analysis. The mean incidence of AMI was 6.2 (95% CI 1.9 to 12.9) per 100 000 person years. On average 5.0 (95% CI 3.3 to 7.1) of 10 000 hospital admissions were due to AMI. Occlusive arterial AMI was the most common form constituting 68.6% (95% CI 63.7 to 73.2) of all AMI cases, with similar proportions of embolism and thrombosis.Overall short-term mortality (in-hospital or within 30 days) of AMI was 59.6% (95% CI 55.5 to 63.6), being 68.7% (95% CI 60.8 to 74.9) in patients treated before the year 2000 and 55.0% (95% CI 45.5 to 64.1) in patients treated from 2000 onwards (p<0.05). The mid/long-term mortality of AMI was 68.2% (95% CI 60.7 to 74.9). Mortality due to mesenteric venous thrombosis was 24.6% (95% CI 17.0 to 32.9) and of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia 58.4% (95% CI 48.6 to 67.7). The short-term mortality of revascularised occlusive arterial AMI was 33.9% (95% CI 30.7 to 37.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients, AMI is a rarely diagnosed condition with high mortality, although with improvement of treatment results over the last decades. Two thirds of AMI cases are of occlusive arterial origin with potential for better survival if revascularised.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021247148.

Mesenteric ischemia: a radiologic perspective

Mesenteric ischemia is a broad term encompassing several clinical conditions leading to impaired vascularity of bowel loops. Absence of specific clinical presentation and a definitive laboratory marker often lead to delayed diagnosis with high morbidity and mortality in the acute setting. Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management. Multi-detector CT (MDCT) is the first line imaging modality for the evaluation of patients with suspected mesenteric ischemia and plays an important role for assessing its severity and complications. This review article highlights the causes, pathophysiology, imaging features and possible endovascular treatment options of mesenteric ischemia.

Acute-On-Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: The Use of Fluorescence Guidance to Diagnose a Nonsurvivable Injury

Mesenteric ischemia (MI) is a condition characterized by compromised intestinal perfusion, leading to varied patterns of bowel hypoxia that requires prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. Here, we report a case in which indocyanine green (ICG) was utilized to evaluate intestinal blood flow in a patient with acute-on-chronic MI. A 65-year-old underweight female presented with abdominal pain out of proportion to exam and was found to have diffuse aortic atherosclerotic disease with chronic occlusion of both superior and inferior mesenteric arteries with distal reconstitution. After multidisciplinary evaluation, elective treatment with vascular surgery was planned; however, on day three of her hospitalization, the patient’s abdominal pain acutely worsened. She was taken to the OR for exploratory laparotomy. Under white light, the small bowel from the ligament of Treitz (LOT) to the terminal ileum and the large bowel from the cecum to the splenic flexure appeared ischemic with patchy areas of necrosis. Fluorescence angiography was then performed; injection of indocyanine green (ICG) dye and imaging with the SPY-PHI near-infrared camera system demonstrated appropriate blood flow into the bowel mesentery, with complete absence of flow into the bowel mucosal surface from the LOT to the splenic flexure, confirming irreversible bowel necrosis. Introduction of ICG intraoperatively decreased the uncertainty associated with white light assessment of bowel viability, leading to a definitive intraoperative diagnosis and clear plan of care. The use of fluorescence guidance to diagnose fulminant small and large bowel necrosis prevented the surgical team from having to perform multiple takebacks to the operating room in the setting of a nonsurvivable injury. Had the surgical team relied on the white light appearance of the bowel, they would not have been able to diagnose the true extent of bowel demise. The patient was placed on comfort care for this devastating nonsurvivable injury.

Serial transverse enteroplasty and nipple valve construction, two life saving techniques for patients with short bowel syndrome, a report of 5 cases

Background

Various abdominal pathologies end up with surgical resection of small intestine. When the small intestine remnant is too short for adequate fluid and micronutrients absorption, short bowel syndrome is diagnosed. The disabling condition needs a multidisciplinary approach to design parenteral nutrition, care for thrombotic, hepatic and infectious complications and gradually wean the patient from parenteral nutrition. Various surgical techniques have been introduced to increase absorptive mucosa and enhance the intestinal adaptation process. Serial transverse enteroplasty and nipple valve reconstruction are among the procedures, which will be discussed in the current article.

Case presentation

Herein, we presented 5 cases of short bowel syndrome as a consequence of abdominal laparotomies, patients were referred to our center to receive parenteral nutrition and to be prepared for the final autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction or intestinal transplantation, if indicated.

Conclusion

Patient’s age, performance status and bowel remnant length determines the appropriate technique for autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction. Serial transverse enteroplasty is designed to increase bowel’s length by creating zigzag patterns through dilated bowel loops. Presence of ileocecal valve is crucial to delay intestinal transit time and to prevent colonic bacterial transfer to ileum. Patient’s with ileocecal valve loss benefit from creating an artificial valve, namely, nipple valve.

Mesenteric Vessel Thrombosis Treatment Experience

BACKGROUND: One of the most serious diseases among all emergency abdominal pathology is an acute violation of the mesenteric blood circulation. The rapid development of intestinal ischemia results in its infarction and necrosis. AIM: The study aims to assess the survival rate of patients with mesenteric vascular thrombosis, taking into account, the predictor characteristics influence of disease development factors. METHODS: The study presents a retrospective analysis of mesenteric vascular thrombosis clinical cases for 2016–2019. During this period, there were 147 patients with an established diagnosis at the Irkutsk Clinical Hospital No. 1, 21 of them met the study criteria. RESULTS: According to the type of thrombosis, there were two groups – occlusive (Group I, n = 11) and non occlusive (Group II, n = 10). Four patients (36.3%) of Group I and 7 patients (70%) of Group II (p = 0.388) recovered from the disease. Three patients (27.2%) of Group I and 4 patients (40%) of Group II (p = 0.662) received conservative therapy, 2 of them (66.6%) in Group I and 4 (100%) in Group II (p = 0.724) recovered from the disease. In addition, the authors performed a mortality assessment, according to the timing of the visit to a medical institution. Four (50%) out of eight patients who applied in the first 12 h, 2 (66%) out of three – in the first 12–24 h, and 5 (50%) out of 10 for more than 24 h of illness had a positive treatment result in the combined group. CONCLUSION: The patients over 70 years old with peritoneal symptoms and established intestinal necrosis have an extremely unfavorable prognosis. The primary mesenteric vessel thrombosis with additional contrast angiography still gives a moderate treatment prognosis.

Endovascular Revascularization with Stent Implantation in Patients with Acute Mesenteric Ischemia due to Acute Arterial Thrombosis: Clinical Outcome and Predictive Factors

Purpose

To determine 30-day-mortality rates and identify predictors for survival in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) due to occlusion of the celiac (CA) or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) from arterial thrombosis in the setting of atherosclerosis at the vessel origin.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis on patients who underwent acute endovascular revascularization to treat AMI caused by thrombotic occlusion of the CA and/or SMA between January 2011 and December 2019 was conducted. 30-day-mortality rates were calculated. Univariate binomial logistic regression analyses (p < 0.05) were performed to assess whether the following factors were associated with 30-day mortality: sex, age, history of smoking, history of abdominal angina, signs of bowel necrosis on pre-interventional CT, one- vs. two-vessel disease, patency of the inferior mesenteric artery, outpatient or inpatient occurrence of ischemia, onset of AMI during ITU stay, elevated pre-interventional serum lactate levels, total leukocyte count, platelet/lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio.

Results

40 patients were included in this analysis. 30-day-mortality rate was 25/40 (62.5%). Median overall survival of patients who survived the first 30 days was 36 ± 18 months. None of the analyzed factors was statistically significantly associated with 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

Although mortality of patients with AMI due to acute arterial thrombosis remains high, almost 40% of patient who underwent emergent endovascular revascularization survived longer than one month. Since no predictors for the outcome in these patients were identified, all patients with AMI should be offered an immediate revascularization effort.

Frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia after cardiac arrest

PURPOSE

Mesenteric ischaemia after successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest (CA) has been insufficiently studied. We aimed to assess the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) after CA.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients admitted to a CA centre with sustained return of spontaneous circulation between 2007 and 2017. NOMI was suspected based on clinical symptoms and classified as possible if no tests were feasible or the only test was a negative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan and as confirmed if diagnosed by endoscopy, CT, or surgery.

RESULTS

Of 1343 patients, 82 (6%) had suspected NOMI, including 33 (2.5%) with confirmed NOMI. Investigations for suspected NOMI were done in 47/82 (57%) patients (CT, n = 30; lower digestive endoscopy, n = 14; and upper digestive endoscopy, n = 12); 11 patients underwent surgery. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with suspected NOMI were female sex (OR, 1.8; 95%CI, 1.1-2.9, p = 0.02), cardiovascular comorbidities (OR, 1.6; 95%CI, 1.0-2.7; p = 0.047), admission lactate >5 mmol/L (OR, 2.0; 95%CI, 1.2-3.4; p = 0.01), low flow >17 min (OR, 2.2; 95%CI, 1.3-3.8; p = 0.003), and inotropic score >7 μg/kg/min (OR, 1.8; 95%CI, 1.1-3.2; p = 0.03). ICU mortality was 96% (79/82), with 61% of patients dying from multi-organ failure (MOF) and 35% from post-anoxic brain injury. Of the eight patients who regained consciousness, 5 finally died from MOF, leaving 3 patients discharged alive from the ICU with a good neurologic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

NOMI may affect 2.5-6% of patients after CA. Mortality was extremely high in patients, and very few survived with a good neurological outcome.

MR Imaging-based Evaluation of Mesenteric Ischemia Caused by Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction and Mesenteric Venous Occlusion: An Experimental Study Using Rabbits

PURPOSE

This study assessed the MRI findings of strangulated small bowel obstruction (SBO) and mesenteric venous occlusion (MVO) in a rabbit model using 3T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty rabbits were included in this study. The strangulated SBO and MVO models were generated via surgical procedures in nine rabbits, and sham surgery was performed in two rabbits. The success of generating the models was confirmed via angiographic, macroscopic, and microscopic findings after the surgical procedure. MRI was performed before and 30 min after inducing mesenteric ischemia. T₁-weighted images (T₁WIs), T₂-weighted images (T₂WIs), and fat-suppressed T₂WIs (FS-T₂WIs) were obtained using the BLADE technique, and fat-suppressed T₁WIs (FS-T₁WIs) were obtained. The signal intensities of the affected bowel before and after the surgical procedures were visually categorized as high, iso, and low intense compared with the findings for the normal bowel wall on all sequences. Bowel wall thickness was measured, and the signal intensity ratio (SI ratio) was calculated using the signal intensities of the bowel wall and psoas muscle.

RESULTS

Angiographic, macroscopic, and microscopic findings confirmed that all surgical procedures were successful. The ischemic bowel wall was thicker than the normal bowel. The bowel wall was thicker in the MVO model (3.17 ± 0.55 mm) than in the strangulated SBO model (2.26 ± 0.46 mm). The signal intensity and SI ratio of the bowel wall were significantly higher after the procedure than before the procedure on all sequences in both models. The mesentery adjacent to the ischemic bowel loop exhibited a high signal intensity in all animals on FS-T₂WIs.

CONCLUSION

Non-contrast MRI can be used to evaluate mesenteric ischemia caused by strangulated SBO and MVO. FS-T₂WIs represented the best modality for depicting the high signal intensity in the bowel wall and mesentery caused by ischemia.

Review Article: Mesenteric Ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mesenteric ischemia (MI), both acute (AMI) and chronic (CMI), is a challenging diagnosis to make, and early diagnosis and treatment are vital to improve outcomes. This manuscript summarizes the most up to date information on diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been several significant advancements in the computed tomography (CT) diagnostic imaging as well as medical and endovascular management of AMI and CMI. In appropriate populations, endovascular interventions appear superior to open surgical management with lower mortality, morbidity, and cost of care. Efficient clinical identification and targeted testing are essential to diagnose AMI and CMI. Aggressive resuscitation and early endovascular (or in select cases, surgical) intervention improve outcomes in those with AMI. In those with CMI, considering this on the differential diagnosis and imaging appropriately can identify those that might benefit from intervention and halt progression to acute episodes.

Use of ICG imaging to confirm bowel viability after upper mesenteric stenting in patient with acute mesenteric ischemia: Case report

•

A 70-year-old man with NSTEMI was diagnosed with AMI on the 3rd day after primary coronary intervention.

•

Acute mesenteric ischemia is a life-threatening disease with high mortality rate, varying from 40% to 69%.

•

The man underwent thoracoscopic SMA angiography with aspiration thrombectomy and stenting.

•

On the next day a diagnostic laparoscopy with ICG fluorescence was implemented to access bowel viability.

•

The patient is alive at 4 months after operative treatment of AMI.

Introduction

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a rare and life-threatening disease. Despite modern advances in open and endovascular treatments it has unacceptably high mortality rate.

Presentation of case

A 70-year-old man with NSTEMI was diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia on the 3rd day after primary coronary intervention. CT with intravenous contrast revealed a generalized abdominal aorta atherosclerosis and a circular thrombus in SMA. Then a superior mesenteric angiography with aspiration thrombectomy, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting was performed. The next day abdominal pain still persisted. A diagnostic laparoscopy with ICG fluorescence was implemented. There were no ischemia and necrotic changes. The patient was alive at 4 months after the operative treatment of AMI.

Discussion

In patients with myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, accompanied by any invasive procedure, especially endovascular, the incidence of thrombosis and thromboembolic complications is high. This is the key to the suspicion of such a serious complication as AMI. It can be assumed that in some cases, with adequate revascularization of the small intestine, reperfusion syndrome may occur and cause ischemic necrosis of the intestinal wall. In this case it is necessary to perform control laparoscopy in 24–48 h.

Conclusion

In patients with suspected AMI timely applying of MDCT, angiography, endovascular revascularization and ICG quality control of perfusion after revascularization are expedient to improve the results of treatment. These patients should be treated by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a cardiologist, a cardiovascular and endovascular surgeon, a general surgeon with experience in working with such patients.

Acute mesenteric ischaemia: imaging and intervention

Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) is an abdominal emergency in which an acute reduction in mesenteric arterial supply threatens bowel viability and may result in bowel infarction, perforation, and death. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment over recent decades, mortality rates in AMI remain very high. This article discusses the aetiological classification, pathophysiology, and clinical aspects of AMI. The specific imaging characteristics of each aetiological type of AMI are detailed and the role of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of AMI is discussed. Surgery is the established treatment of choice for AMI, but there is increasing use of endovascular techniques in treating AMI in cases where there are no clinical features of peritonism or radiological evidence of irreversible ischaemia. This article reviews the evidence for different diagnostic and management strategies for patients with AMI and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of surgical and endovascular treatments. Endovascular techniques have been reported to have high technical success rates and favourable outcomes when compared to open surgery; however, patient selection bias and a paucity of data limit the conclusions that can be drawn.

Choice of First Emergency Room Affects the Fate of Patients With Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: The Importance of Referral Patterns and Triage

OBJECTIVES

Despite modern advances in diagnosis and treatment, acute arterial mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) remains a high mortality disease. One of the key modifiable factors in AMI is the first door to operation time, but the factors attributing to this parameter are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delay, with special focus on the pathways to treatment.

METHODS

This was a single academic centre retrospective study. Patients undergoing intervention for AMI caused by thrombosis or embolism of the superior mesenteric artery between 2006 and 2015 were identified from electronic patient records. Patients not eligible for intervention or with chronic, subacute onset, colonic only, venous, or non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the first speciality examining the patient (surgical emergency room [SER], surgeon examining the patient first or non-surgical emergency room [non-SER], internist examining the patient first). The primary endpoint was first door to operation time and secondary endpoints were length of stay and 90 day mortality.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with AMI were included. Fifty patients (62%) died during the first 30 days and 53 (65%) within 90 days. Presenting first in non-SER (vs. SER) was independently associated with a first door to operation time of over 12 h (OR 3.7 [95% CI 1.3-10.2], median time 15.2 h [IQR 10.9-21.2] vs. 10.1 h [IQR 6.9-18.5], respectively, p = .025). The length of stay was shorter (median 6.5 days [4.0-10.3] vs. 10.8 days [7.0-22.3], p = .045) and 90 day mortality was lower in the SER group (50.0% vs. 74.5%, p = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

The first specialty that the patient encounters seems to be crucial for both delayed management and early survival of AMI. Developing fast/direct pathways to a unit with both gastrointestinal and vascular surgeons offers the possibility of improving the outcome of AMI.

"Second-look" laparotomy: warranted, or contributor to excessive open abdomens?

INTRODUCTION

The overuse of temporary abdominal closure and second look (SL) laparotomy in emergency general surgery (EGS) cases has been questioned in the recent literature. In an effort to hopefully decrease the number of open abdomen (OA) patients, we hypothesize that reviewing our cases, many of these SL patients could be managed with single-stage operative therapy and thus decrease the number of OA patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from Jun 2013-Jun 2014, evaluating EGS patients managed with an OA who required bowel resection in either index or SL laparotomy. Demographics, clinical variables, complications and mortality were collected. Fisher's exact t test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

During this time frame, 96 patients were managed with OA and 59 patients required a bowel resection. 55 (57%) of those required one bowel resection at the index operation with 4 (4.2%) only requiring one bowel resection at the second operation. In the patients requiring bowel resections, 18 (30%) required a resection at SL. At SL laparotomy, resection was required for questionably viable bowel at the index operation 60% (11), whereas 39% (7) had normal appearing bowel. Indications for resection at SL laparotomy included evolution of existing ischemia, new onset ischemia, staple line revision, and "other". 23 patients (39%) were hemodynamically unstable, contributing to the need for temporary abdominal closure. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative shock was the only predictor of need for further resection. Complications and mortality were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Almost one-fifth of the patients undergoing SL laparotomy for open abdomen required bowel resections, with 6.8% of those having normal appearing bowel at index operation, therefore in select EGS patients, SL laparotomy is a reasonable strategy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular treatment for acute mesenteric ischaemia

Introduction Acute mesenteric ischaemia is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular techniques have emerged as a viable alternative treatment option to conventional surgery. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and perform a meta-analysis of reported outcomes. Methods Our review conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016035667). We searched electronic information sources (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL) and bibliographic lists of relevant articles to identify studies reporting outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute mesenteric ischaemia of embolic or thrombotic aetiology. We defined 30-day or in-hospital mortality and bowel resection as the primary outcome measures. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the methodological quality of observational studies. We calculated combined overall effect sizes using random effects models; results are reported as the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Results We identified 19 observational studies reporting on a total of 3362 patients undergoing endovascular treatment for acute mesenteric ischaemia. The pooled estimate of peri-interventional mortality was 0.245 (95% confidence interval 0.197-0.299), that of the requirement for bowel resection 0.326 (95% confidence interval 0.229-0.439), and the pooled estimate for acute kidney injury was 0.132 (95% confidence interval 0.082-0.204). Eight studies reported comparative outcomes of endovascular versus surgical treatment for acute mesenteric ischaemia (endovascular group, 3187 patients; surgical group, 4998 patients). Endovascular therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.67, P = 0.0001), bowel resection (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.59, P < 0.00001) and acute renal failure (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.68, P < 0.00001). No differences were identified in septic complications or the development of short bowel syndrome. Conclusion Endovascular treatment for acute mesenteric ischaemia is associated with a considerable mortality and requirement of bowel resection. However, endovascular therapy confers improved outcomes compared to conventional surgery, as indicated be reduced mortality, risk of bowel resection and acute renal failure. An endovascular-first approach should be considered in patients presenting with acute mesenteric ischaemia.

An investigation of bedside laparoscopy in the ICU for cases of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia

BACKGROUND

Acute mesenteric ischemia is a rare affection with high related mortality. NOMI presents the most important diagnostic problems and is related with the higher risk of white laparotomy. This study wants to give a contribution for the validation of laparoscopic approach in case of NOMI.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients were admitted in last 10 years in ICU of Paolo Giaccone University Hospital of Palermo for AMI. Diagnosis was obtained by multislice CT and selective angiography was done if clinical conditions were permissive. If necrosis was already present or suspected, surgical approach was done. Endovascular or surgical embolectomy was performed when necessary. Twenty NOMI patients underwent medical treatment performing laparoscopy 24 h later to verify the evolution of AMI. A three-port technique was used. In all patients we performed a bed side procedure 48-72 h later in both non-resected and resected group.

RESULTS

In 14 up 20 case of NOMI the disease was extended throughout the splanchnic district, in 6 patients it involved the ileum and the colon; after a first look, only 6 patients underwent resection. One patient died 35 h after diagnosis of NOMI. The second look, 48 h later, demonstrated 4 infarction recurrences in the group of resected patients and onset signs of necrosis in 5 patients of non-resected group. A total of 15 resections were performed on 11 patients. Mortality rate was 6/20-30% but it was much higher in resected group (5/11-45,5%). Non-therapeutic laparotomy was avoided in 9/20 patients and in this group mortality rate was 1/9-11%. No morbidity was recorded related to laparoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy could be a feasible and safety surgical approach for management of patient with NOMI. Our retrospective study demonstrates that laparoscopy don't increase morbidity, reduce mortality avoiding non-therapeutic laparotomy.

ESTES guidelines: acute mesenteric ischaemia

PURPOSE

Acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) accounts for about 1:1000 acute hospital admissions. Untreated, AMI will cause mesenteric infarction, intestinal necrosis, an overwhelming inflammatory response and death. Early intervention can halt and reverse this process leading to a full recovery, but the diagnosis of AMI is difficult and failure to recognize AMI before intestinal necrosis has developed is responsible for the high mortality of the disease. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are the goals of modern therapy, but there are no randomized controlled trials to guide treatment and the published literature contains a high ratio of reviews to original data. Much of that data comes from case reports and often small, retrospective series with no clearly defined treatment criteria.

METHODS

A study group of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) was formed in 2013 with the aim of developing guidelines for the management of AMI. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) thesaurus keywords "mesenteric ischaemia", "bowel ischaemia" and "bowel infarction". The bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional publications. After an initial systematic review of the literature by the whole group, a steering group formulated questions using a modified Delphi process. The evidence was then reviewed to answer these questions, and recommendations formulated and agreed by the whole group.

RESULTS

The resultant recommendations are presented in this paper.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for practice that will lead to improved outcomes for patients.

Debate: Whether an endovascular-first strategy is the optimal approach for treating acute mesenteric ischemia

Acute mesenteric ischemia continues to be a life-threatening insult in often-elderly patients with many comorbidities. Recognition and correct diagnosis can be an issue leading to delays in therapy that result in loss of bowel or life, or both. The basic surgical principals in treating acute mesenteric ischemia have long been early recognition, resuscitation, urgent revascularization, resection of necrotic bowel, and reassessment with second-look laparotomies. Endovascular techniques now offer a less invasive alternative, but whether an endovascular-first or open surgery-first approach is preferred in most patients is unclear. Our discussants will attempt to clarify these issues.

Mortality after acute primary mesenteric infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the in-hospital mortality for acute mesenteric infarction has reduced in the last decade. The secondary aim was to determine if there was a statistical difference in mortality between patients having acute primary mesenteric infarction due to different causes.

METHOD

A literature search was performed of PubMed, Ovid (Embase) and Google Scholar databases. Studies on acute mesenteric infarction of primary vascular pathology were included for pooled analyses while studies that had reported comparative mortality between arterial, venous and non-occlusive mesenteric infarction (NOMI) were included in meta-analyses. Their quality was assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence assessment scale. Odds ratios (ORs) of mortality were calculated using a Mantel-Haenszel random effect model.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 4527 and the male/female ratio was 1912/2247. The pooled in-hospital mortality was 63%. There was no significant reduction of in-hospital mortality rate in the last decade (P = 0.78). There was a significant difference in in-hospital mortality between acute arterial mesenteric infarction (73.9%) compared with acute venous mesenteric infarction (41.7%) [OR 3.47, confidence interval (CI) 2.43-4.96, P < 0.001] and NOMI (68.5%) compared with acute venous mesenteric infarction (44.2%) (OR 3.2, CI 1.83-5.6, P < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality between acute arterial mesenteric infarction and NOMI (OR 1.08, CI 0.57-2.03, P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

In-hospital mortality rate has not changed in the last decade. Patients with arterial mesenteric infarction or with NOMI are over three times more likely to die during the first hospital admission compared with those with venous mesenteric infarction.

Serum value of procalcitonin as a marker of intestinal damages: type, extension, and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Ischemic and necrotic damages are complications of digestive diseases and require emergency management. Nevertheless, the decision to surgically manage could be delayed because of no sufficiently preoperative accurate marker of ischemia diagnosis, extension, and prognosis.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels for diagnosing intestinal necrotic damages, their extension, and their prognosis in patients with ischemic disease including ischemic colitis and mesenteric infarction by a gray zone approach. Between January 2007 to June 2014, 128 patients with ischemic colitis and mesenteric infarction (codes K55.0 and K51.9) were operated, for whom data on PCT were available. We perform a retrospective, multicenter review of their medical records. Patients were divided into subgroups: ischemia (ID group) versus necrosis (ND group); the extension [focal (FD) vs. extended (ED)] and the vital status [deceased (D) vs. alive (A)].

RESULTS

PCT levels were higher in the ND (n = 94; p = 0.009); ED (n = 100; p = 0.02); and D (n = 70; p = 0.0003) groups. With a gray zone approach, the predictive thresholds were (i) for necrosis 2.473 ng/mL, (ii) for extension 3.884 ng/mL, and (iii) for mortality 7.87 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

In our population, PCT could be used as a marker of necrosis; especially in case of extended damages and reflects the patient's prognosis.

Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a commonly fatal result of inadequate bowel perfusion that requires immediate evaluation by both vascular and general surgeons. Treatment often involves vascular repair as well as bowel resection and the possible need for parenteral nutrition. Little data exist regarding the rates of bowel resection following endovascular vs open repair of AMI.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample database, admissions from 2005 through 2009 were identified according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes correlating to both AMI (557.0) and subsequent vascular intervention (39.26, 38.16, 38.06, 39.9, 99.10). Patients with a diagnosis of AMI but no intervention or nonemergent admission status were excluded. Patient level data regarding age, gender, and comorbidities were also examined. Outcome measures included mortality, length of stay, the need for bowel resection (45.6, 45.71-9, 45.8), or infusion of total parenteral nutrition (TPN; 99.10) during the same hospitalization. Statistical analysis was conducted by χ(2) tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 23,744 patients presenting with AMI, 4665 underwent interventional treatment from 2005 through 2009. Of these patients, 57.1% were female, and the mean age was 70.5 years. A total of 679 patients underwent vascular intervention; 514 (75.7%) underwent open surgery and 165 (24.3%) underwent endovascular treatment overall during the study period. The proportion of patients undergoing endovascular repair increased from 11.9% of patients in 2005 to 30.0% in 2009. Severity of comorbidities, as measured by the Charlson index, did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. Mortality was significantly more commonly associated with open revascularization compared with endovascular intervention (39.3% vs 24.9%; P = .01). Length of stay was also significantly longer in the patient group undergoing open revascularization (12.9 vs 17.1 days; P = .006). During the study time period, 14.4% of patients undergoing endovascular procedures required bowel resection compared with 33.4% for open revascularization (P < .001). Endovascular repair was also less commonly associated with requirement for TPN support (13.7% vs 24.4%; P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular intervention for AMI had increased significantly in the modern era. Among AMI patients undergoing revascularization, endovascular treatment was associated with decreased mortality and shorter length of stay. Furthermore, endovascular intervention was associated with lower rates of bowel resection and need for TPN. Further research is warranted to determine if increased use of endovascular repair could improve overall and gastrointestinal outcomes among patients requiring vascular repair for AMI.

Unspecific clinical presentation of bowel ischemia in the very old. Digitalis treatment - a reason for higher mortality?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ischemic bowel disease predominantly affects the elderly (>65 years). Early diagnosis and treatment are of vital importance for the outcome. The vague symptoms of ischemic bowel disease entail a risk of delayed diagnosis, with a subsequent risk of increased mortality. The aims of this retrospective study were to identify symptoms and prodromes, to study factors associated with mortality in ischemic bowel disease, and to describe the influence of age, by comparing patients <80 and > or = 80 years.

METHODS

The subjects of the study were 135 patients, mean age 77 years, admitted to Malmö University Hospital, Sweden, between 1987 and 1996, with a ICD-9 diagnosis of acute or chronic splanchnic ischemia.

RESULTS

Patients aged 80 years or more presented with a significantly higher prevalence of confusion (29% vs 12%), hematemesis (57% vs 14%), vomiting (82% vs 65%) and dehydration (58% vs 36%) at admission compared with patients aged under 80 years, and presented a higher mortality (87% compared with 65%, p=0.003). The prevalence of digitalis treatment was 34%, which was high compared with other Swedish cohort studies. Digitalis, adjusted for age, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation, was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.3-16.1). Prodromal signs predicted poor outcome, and were found in one out of 4 patients, without any age differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Bowel ischemia in the very old is associated with a different clinical presentation and a higher mortality compared with younger patients. Digitalis treatment seems to be associated with increased mortality in ischemic bowel disease. Prodromal signs are prognostically unfavorable.

Abdominal catastrophes in the intensive care unit setting

Patients in the setting of the intensive care unit can develop intra-abdominal complications that may worsen outcome. Clinical suspicion of such complications coupled with early diagnosis and treatment may reduce morbidity and mortality associated with these processes. This article addresses the diagnosis and management of some of the common causes of intra-abdominal catastrophes.

Mesenteric ischaemia ocurring as a late complication after-aorto-femoral bypass

Patients with coexisting peripheral vascular disease and coronary artery disease constitute a high risk surgical group. Perioperative management of such patients is an anaesthetic challenge. A 57-year-old male presented with critical limb ischaemia and impending gangrene of the right lower limb. Associated coronary artery disease with triple vessel involvement was diagnosed on coronary angiography. This patient underwent an aorto-femoral bypass. The postoperative course was complicated by the development of mesenteric ischaemia requiring emergency laparotomy and bowel resection.

Epidemiology of mesenteric vascular disease: clinical implications

The overall incidence rate of acute mesenteric ischemia between 1970 and 1982, diagnosed at either autopsy or operation, in the population of Malmö, Sweden was estimated at 12.9/100,000 person-years. Autopsy rate was 87%. Acute superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion (embolus/thrombus ratio = 1.4), mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT), and nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) were found in approximately 68%, 16%, and 16%, respectively. Acute SMA occlusion was found to be more common than ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. The incidence increased exponentially with age, equally distributed among men and women after adjusting for age and gender in the population. Thrombotic occlusions were located more proximally than embolic occlusions and intestinal infarction was more extensive, whereas patients with embolus had a higher frequency of acute myocardial infarction, and had cardiac thrombi in 48% and synchronous emboli in 68% of the patients. The proportion of patients with symptoms inherent with chronic mesenteric ischemia prior to onset of acute thrombotic occlusion has been reported to occur in 73%. Cardiac failure, history of atrial fibrillation, and recent surgery have all been associated with fatal NOMI. MVT is either caused by thrombophilia, direct injury, or local venous congestion or stasis. Multidetector row computed tomography with intravenous contrast enhancement and imaging in the arterial phase for suspicion of acute SMA occlusion and imaging in the venous phase for MVT has become the diagnostic method of choice. In-hospital mortality is highest for NOMI, lower for acute SMA occlusion, and lowest, around 20%, for MVT.

Mesenteric ischemia: still a deadly puzzle for the medical community

The main goal of this article is to update etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of the various causes of mesenteric ischemia in order to elucidate its labyrinthine clinical riddle, by reviewing the current English medical literature. Mesenteric ischemia is a quite uncommon disorder, observed in the emergency department. It is a life-threatening vascular emergency that requires early diagnosis and intervention to restore mesenteric blood flow and to prevent bowel necrosis and patient death. Consequently, it is a vital diagnosis to make because of its high mortality rate and its thorny complications. The underlying causes vary, and the prognosis depends on the specific findings during clinical examination. Vague and nonspecific clinical findings and limitations of diagnostic studies make the diagnosis a significant challenge. The prognosis of acute mesenteric ischemia of any type is grave. The complications following this medical jigsaw puzzle are also severe. Patients in whom the diagnosis is missed until infarction occurs have a mortality rate of 90%. Even with good treatment, up to 50-80% of patients die. Survivors of extensive bowel resection face lifelong disability. Despite the progress in understanding the pathogenesis of mesenteric ischemia and the development of treatment modalities, the entity remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Delay in diagnosis contributes to a high mortality rate. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment can improve the clinical outcome. Even if diagnostic modalities have improved since the first successful attempts to confront effectively this clinical entity, mesenteric ischemia still remains a lethal diagnostic enigma for the medical community.

Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: The Importance of Early Surgical Consultation

Acute mesenteric ischemia continues to be associated with high mortality. We hypothesized that delays in surgical consultation and operation are independently associated with increased mortality and sought to identify modifiable characteristics associated with delayed management. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 72 patients diagnosed with acute mesenteric ischemia. Twenty-six (36%) patients died, of which 14 (54%) had care withdrawn. Delay in operation (>6 hours after surgical consultation) was associated with increased mortality (adjusted OR 3.7; 90% CI, 1.1-12). For patients for whom care was not withdrawn, delay in surgical consultation (>24 hours after disease onset) was associated with increased mortality (adjusted OR, 9.4; 90% CI, 1.3-65), as was delay in operation (adjusted OR, 4.9; 90% CI, 1.1-22). For those managed medically, early surgical consultation was associated with improved mortality (Odds Ratio [OR], 0; 90% Confidence Interval [CI], 0-0.34). Patients with delayed surgical consultation were more likely to have abdominal distension, elevated lactate concentration, acute renal failure, vasopressor administration, and a lack of abdominal pain. The acquisition of CT imaging trended toward an association with delayed surgical consultation ( P = 0.06). We conclude that early surgical consultation is associated with improved outcome even for patients managed without operative intervention, and that CT imaging may delay appropriate care.

Acute mesenteric ischemia after cardio-pulmonary bypass surgery

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a highly-lethal surgical emergency. Several pathophysiologic events (arterial obstruction, venous thrombosis and diffuse vasospasm) lead to a sudden decrease in mesenteric blood flow. Ischemia/reperfusion syndrome of the intestine is responsible for systemic abnormalities, leading to multi-organ failure and death. Early diagnosis is difficult because the clinical presentation is subtle, and the biological and radiological diagnostic tools lack sensitivity and specificity. Therapeutic options vary from conservative resuscitation, medical treatment, endovascular techniques and surgical resection and revascularization. A high index of suspicion is required for diagnosis, and prompt treatment is the only hope of reducing the mortality rate. Studies are in progress to provide more accurate diagnostic tools for early diagnosis. AMI can complicate the post-operative course of patients following cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB). Several factors contribute to the systemic hypo-perfusion state, which is the most frequent pathophysiologic event. In this particular setting, the clinical presentation of AMI can be misleading, while the laboratory and radiological diagnostic tests often produce inconclusive results. The management strategies are controversial, but early treatment is critical for saving lives. Based on the experience of our team, we consider prompt exploratory laparotomy, irrespective of the results of the diagnostic tests, is the only way to provide objective assessment and adequate treatment, leading to dramatic reduction in the mortality rate.

Unchanged high mortality rates from acute occlusive intestinal ischemia: six year review

OBJECTIVE

Acute intestinal ischemia (AII) is an uncommon surgical emergency that has been increasing in incidence and remains a highly lethal condition with a difficult diagnosis. We undertook this study to evaluate our experience in treating this condition with a view to expand the cumulative information in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2006, 60 patients with AII caused by thrombotic vascular event underwent surgery at our surgical center. The patients' medical records including data covering demographic features, comorbid medical conditions, medical risk factors, clinical symptoms, history and physical examination findings, and biochemical and radiologic examinations were reviewed. Operative records, the American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification (ASA-PS), postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and final outcome were also considered.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients with primary thrombotic vascular event, 20 patients had embolism and 19 patients arterial thrombosis. In 21 patients, mesenteric venous thrombosis was the etiology of AII. The median age was 73 years (range, 43-96). Higher ASA classification, age >70 years, late presentation, and high serum lactate levels were predictors of adverse outcome. The overall death rate was 60% (36/60), which was within the range of that observed in the published series.

CONCLUSION

AII remains a highly lethal condition. Mortality rates remain as high as they did decades ago due in part to advanced presentation and advanced age with multiple associated conditions and risk factors, all of which are independent predictors of adverse outcome.

Impact of etiologic factors and APACHE II and POSSUM scores in management and clinical outcome of acute intestinal ischemic disorders after surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Acute intestinal ischemic disorder (AIID) is an uncommon vascular disease with high mortality. According to etiology, it can be categorized into three groups: arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia (AOMI), mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT), and nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI). This study analyzes the effect of classification on surgical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All AIID patients who underwent operative treatment at National Cheng Kung University Hospital between January 1989 and August 2003 were enrolled in this study. Preoperative information on these patients was compared to find predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

Data from 77 patients (49 men and 28 women, median age 70 years) were analyzed. The etiology was AOMI in 30 patients, MVT in 19 patients, and NOMI in 28 patients. Median age was younger in MVT (54 years) than in AOMI (70 years) or NOMI (72 years). In addition, MVT usually involved the jejunum (74%, versus 31% in AOMI and 46% in NOMI), whereas both AOMI and NOMI involved ileum and colon. The patients with AOMI had shorter duration of symptoms and higher ratio of underlying hypertension than those with MVT. The overall mortality rate was 53.2% (41/77). The day 1 and day 30 mortality were 0% and 10.5% in MVT, 16.7% and 30% in AOMI, and 42.9% and 67.9% in NOMI, respectively (P < 0.05). Both the etiology and the APACHE II scores were significant risk factors for day 30 and long-term mortality. The patients with NOMI had higher POSSUM physiologic scores than patients with MVT. The P-POSSUM regression equation can accurately predict mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MVT had a more favorable prognosis, whereas those with NOMI had the worst outlook. The APACHE II and POSSUM scoring systems are useful in predicting the clinical outcome. Early diagnosis and classification of AIID patients are useful for aggressive treatment to improve the clinical outcome.

Assessing risk factors for adverse outcomes in emergent colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

A variety of factors influence the increased morbidity and mortality seen in patients undergoing emergent colon surgery. Understanding comorbid conditions and variations in preoperative laboratory values that effect both morbidity and mortality can influence clinical decision making.

METHODS

During a 5-year period 185 patients underwent colon surgery at the Veterans Administration Hospital in West Haven, CT. Through a retrospective chart review patients were classified as having either emergent or elective surgery. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using Chi Square and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Differences existed in preoperative variables as well as postoperative outcomes when comparing emergent and elective paitents. In those patients undergoing emergent colorectal surgery, both morbidity and mortality were increased and overall survival decresed when compared to a non-emergent population.

CONCLUSIONS

Through identification of preoperative variables such as a hematocrit <30, the use of steroids, an albumin <3.5, and a creatinine of >1.4, those patients at risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality can be identified and clinical decision making can be appropriately adjusted.

Damage control surgery and angiography in cases of acute mesenteric ischaemia

BACKGROUND

Acute mesenteric arterial occlusion typically presents late and has an estimated mortality of 60-80%. This report examines the evolution of a novel management approach to this difficult surgical problem at a teaching hospital in rural Australia.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 20 consecutive cases that presented to Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, between 1995 and 2003 was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients who were actively treated, 10 survived. Mortality was associated with attempting an emergency operative revascularisation and not performing a second-look laparotomy. All three patients who had a damage control approach at the initial operation survived and in four cases endovascular intervention successfully achieved reperfusion of acutely ischaemic bowel.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from the series of patients described suggests that damage control surgery and early angiography improve survival in patients suffering acute mesenteric ischaemia. A damage control approach involves emergency resection of ischaemic bowel with no attempt to restore gastrointestinal continuity and formation of a laparostomy. Patients are stabilised in the intensive care unit (ICU) and angiography can be arranged to either plan a definitive bypass procedure or alternatively endovascular therapies can be carried out in an attempt to arrest gastrointestinal infarction. Definitive surgery is then considered after 2-3 days. This approach is particularly attractive if immediate specialist vascular expertise is not available.

Does a second-look operation improve survival in patients with peritonitis due to acute mesenteric ischemia? A five-year retrospective experience

Second-look laparotomy is one of the mainstays of surgical treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The aim of this study was to analyze its role in the survival of patients with infarcted gangrenous bowel resulting from AMI. A retrospective chart review of all patients admitted over the study period was undertaken. The study population consisted of 41 patients with clinical evidence of peritonitis and gangrenous, perforated bowel on surgical exploration. Outcome was compared among patients who underwent second-look laparotomy and those who did not. Fifteen patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of less than 4 underwent second-look laparotomy. Six patients had residual necrotic bowel that required additional resection. Only one (17%) of them survived. Of the nine remaining patients, who had no evidence of necrosis, only two survived (22%). Overall survival in this group was 20%. Twenty-six patients were managed without second-look laparotomy. Nine of them, with an ASA score of 4-5, died soon after the operation. The decision not to operate on the remaining 17 patients with an ASA score < 4 was made by an experienced surgeon. Eleven of those patients (65%) survived. Overall survival in the non-second-look group was 42%. Excluding the early deaths, the survival in the non re-explored group was significantly higher than in the second-look group (65% vs. 20%, p = 0.011). A selective approach to the surgical treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia based on the sound clinical judgment of an experienced surgeon may be as appropriate as its universal application.