Peritoneal cultures and antibiotic treatment in patients with perforated appendicitis

MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF ABDOMINAL CAVITY EXUDATE, BLOOD AND AFFECTED TISSUES SAMPLES FROM PATIENTS WITH INTRA-ABDOMINAL ABSCESSES IN COMPLICATED INFECTION OF ABDOMINAL CAVITY

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To conduct an analysis of the results of a microbiological examination of biological samples taken from patients with intra-abdominal abscesses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Material for microbiological examination was collected from 60 patients during surgery and transported to laboratory at the same day. Isolation and identification of microbial pure cultures were performed by standard microbiological methods. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica software.

RESULTS

Results: Analyzing the microbiological research results indicated importance of the sample collecting time (first or repeated surgery). In pa¬tient's blood taken during first surgery it was found a statistically significant predominance of no growth of microflora. In abdominal cav¬ity exudates anaerobic cultures increased statistically significantly in repeated surgery. It was noted that in samples taken during first sur¬gery mixed pathogens were represented mainly by facultative anaerobic cocci, then in repeated surgery anaerobic microorganisms were predominant. Examination of liver abscess content found that monoculture was isolated in 85.7 %. Blood and affected tissue samples in such patients were sterile. Investigation of samples from patients with multiple abdominal cavity abscesses revealed anaerobic microorganisms in 16.7 %. Blood samples of that patients in 40 % were sterile.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: An analysis showed that in appendicular abscesses content gram-negatives were predominant. Gram-positive bacteria dominated in paravesical abscesses with 65 % isolates from gallbladder and 66.7 % from the affected tissue samples. In liver abscesses gram-positive cocci were isolated in 57.1 %. In multiple abdominal abscesses due to bowel perforation rod-shaped microflora was predominant (76 %) and represented by either obligate aerobes or obligate and facultative anaerobes.

Antibiotic resistance is common in the cultures of intraabdominal abscess drainage after appendectomy

INTRODUCTION

Intraabdominal abscesses (IAA) are a common complication following appendectomy. Empiric antibiotic regimens may fail to prevent IAA due to changes in bacterial resistance. We aim to describe the bacteriology of pediatric patients requiring drainage of an IAA after an appendectomy for appendicitis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients ≤18 years who underwent percutaneous drainage of an IAA following appendectomy a single U.S. children's hospital between 2015 and 2018. Patient demographics, appendicitis characteristics, antibiotic regimens, and culture data were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients required drainage of an IAA of which 48 (67%) were male, the average age was 9.81 (SD 3.31) years and 68 (95.7%) having complicated appendicitis. Ceftriaxone/metronidazole was the most common empiric regimen prior to IAA drainage occurring in 64 (90.1%) patients. IAA cultures isolated organisms in 34 (47.9%) patients. Of those with positive cultures, 17 (50%) cases demonstrated an antimicrobial resistant organism. Most notably, 20% of Escherichia coli was resistant to the empiric regimen. Empiric antimicrobial regimens did not appropriately cover 92.3% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures or 100% of Enterococcus species cultures. Antimicrobial regimens were changed following IAA drainage in 30 (42.2%) instances with 23 (32.4%) instances due to resistance in culture results or lack of appropriate empiric antimicrobial coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

IAA culture data following appendectomy for appendicitis frequently demonstrates resistance to or lack of appropriate coverage by empiric antimicrobial regimens. These data support close review of IAA culture results to identify prevalent resistant pathogens along with local changes in resistance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an endoscopic procedure for management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA). In addition to being minimally invasive, it has the added advantages of preservation of appendix and simultaneous inspection of colon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on ERAT in patients with AA.

Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases (from inception through January 2022) to identify studies reporting ERAT in AA. The primary outcome was to evaluate the overall clinical and technical success of ERAT. The secondary outcome was to study the total and individual adverse events (AEs). The meta-analysis was performed using Der Simonian and Laird random effect model.

Results Seven studies reporting on 298 patients were included. The majority of the patient population was male (55.3 %), with mean age of 31 ± 12.39 years. The pooled technical success rate was 99.36 % (95 % CI 97.61–100, I2 = 0) and the pooled clinical success rate was 99.29 % (95 % CI 97.48–100, I2 = 0). The pooled AE rate was 0.19 % (95 % CI 0–1.55, I2 = 0). The most common AE was perforation with 0.19 % (95 % CI 0–1.55, I2 = 0). The recurrence rate was 6.01 % (95 % CI 2.9–9.93, I2 = 20.10). Average length of procedure was 41.1 ± 7.16 min. Low heterogeneity was noted in in our meta-analysis.

Conclusions ERAT is a safe procedure with high rates of clinical and technical success in patients with AA. Further randomized controlled trials should be performed to assess the utility of ERAT in AA as compared to laparoscopic appendectomy.

Microbial Epidemiology of Acute and Perforated Appendicitis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of an EAST Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

There are significant practice variations in antibiotic treatment for appendicitis, ranging from short-course narrow spectrum to long-course broad-spectrum. We sought to describe the modern microbial epidemiology of acute and perforated appendicitis in adults to help inform appropriate empiric coverage and support antibiotic stewardship initiatives.

METHODS

This is a post-hoc secondary analysis of the Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous (MUSTANG) which prospectively enrolled adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with appendicitis between January 2017 and June 2018 across 28 centers in the United States. We included all subjects with positive microbiologic cultures during primary or secondary (rescue after medical failure) appendectomy or percutaneous drainage. Culture yield was compared between low- and high-grade appendicitis as per the AAST classification.

RESULTS

A total of 3,471 patients were included: 230 (7%) had cultures performed, and 179/230 (78%) had positive results. Cultures were less likely to be positive in grade 1 compared to grades 3, 4, or 5 appendicitis with 2/18 (11%) vs 61/70 (87%) (p < .001). Only 1 subject had grade 2 appendicitis and culture results were negative. E. coli was the most common pathogen and cultured in 29 (46%) of primary appendectomy samples, 16 (50%) of secondary, and 44 (52%) of percutaneous drainage samples.

CONCLUSION

Culturing low-grade appendicitis is low yield. E. coli is the most commonly cultured microbe in acute and perforated appendicitis. This data helps inform empiric coverage for both antibiotics alone and as an adjunct to operative or percutaneous intervention.

[Recommendations on treatment of acute appendicitis : Recommendations of an expert group based on the current literature]

The paradigm shift in the treatment concept for acute appendicitis is currently the subject of intensive discussions. The diagnosis and differentiation of an uncomplicated from a complicated appendicitis as well as the selection of an adequate treatment is very challenging, especially since nonoperative treatment models have been published. The laparoscopic appendectomy is still the standard for most cases. Guidelines for the treatment of acute appendicitis do not exist in Germany. Therefore, a group of experts elaborated 21 recommendations on the treatment of acute appendicitis after 3 meetings. After initial definition of population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) questions, recommendations have been finalized through the Delphi voting system. The results were evaluated according to the current literature. The aim of this initiative was to define a basic support for decision making in the clinical routine for treatment of acute appendicitis.

Usefulness of intraoperative culture swabs in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis

PURPOSE

Intraabdominal abscess (IAA) is a feared complication after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for complicated appendicitis. Benefits of obtaining intraoperative culture swabs (ICS) still remain controversial. We aimed to determine whether ICS modify the rate and management of IAA after LA for complicated appendicitis.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who underwent LA for complicated appendicitis from 2008 to 2018 were included. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (G1), with ICS, and group 2 (G2), without ICS. Demographics, operative variables, pathogen isolation, antibiotic sensitivity, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1639 LA were performed in the study period. Of these, 270 (16.5%) were complicated appendicitis; 90 (33%) belonged to G1 and 180 (67%) to G2. In G1, a higher proportion of patients had generalized peritonitis (G1, 63.3%; G2, 35%; p < 0.01). Seventy-two (80%) patients had positive cultures in G1. The most frequently isolated bacteria were E. coli (66.7%), Bacteroides spp. (34.7%), and Streptococcus spp. (19.4%). In 26 (36%) patients, the initial empiric antibiotic course was modified due to bacterial resistance. The rate of IAA was higher in patients with ICS (G1, 21.1%; G2, 9.4%; p = 0.01). IAA was treated similarly in both groups. A different type of bacteria was isolated in 7 (53.8%) patients with new culture swabs.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining ICS in LA for complicated appendicitis with further antibiotic adjustment to the initial pathogen did not lower the incidence of postoperative IAA and did not modify the treatment needed for this complication.

Recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from patients with acute appendicitis using blood culture bottles

Introducción.

La apendicitis aguda es la primera causa de abdomen agudo; sin embargo, poco se conoce sobre las bacterias asociadas y su perfil de sensibilidad.

Objetivo.

Identificar y determinar el patrón de resistencia de las bacterias aerobias y anaerobias aisladas en cultivo de líquido periapendicular tomado de los pacientes con apendicitis aguda, y establecer la proporción de bacterias según la fase clínica.

Materiales y métodos.

Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo y prospectivo en el Hospital Universitario de San José de Bogotá (Colombia), en pacientes mayores de 16 años sometidos a apendicectomía abierta. Se tomaron muestras de líquido periapendicular, las cuales se sembraron directamente en botellas de hemocultivos para aerobios y anaerobios.

Resultados.

Se incluyeron 154 pacientes. Del total de cultivos, el 87 % (n=134) fueron positivos: 77 % (n=118) para aerobios y 51 % (n=79) para anaerobios. La proporción de cultivos positivos fue inferior en los casos de apendicitis no complicada, en comparación con aquellos de apendicitis complicada (80 % (66/83) Vs. 95 % (67/71); p=0,003). Los microorganismos aislados con mayor frecuencia fueron: Escherichia coli (53 %) (n=84), Bacteroides sp. (25 %) (n=25), Propionibacterium acnes (21 %) (n=21), Staphylococci coagulasa negativo (17 %) (n=27), Enterococcus sp. (10 %) (n=15) y Fusobacterium sp. (11 %) (n=11). La sensibilidad de E. coli a la amplicilina sulbactam fue de 30 %. La sensibilidad de Bacteroides spp. a la clindamicina y la ampicilina sulbactam fue de 91 %. El 100 % de los anaerobios fueron sensibles a piperacilina tazobactam, ertapenem, meropenem y metronidazol.

Conclusiones.

Los cultivos intraoperatorios son pertinentes en la apendicitis para determinar el patrón epidemiológico local, y establecer los antibióticos profilácticos y terapéuticos para esta enfermedad. Su siembra directa en botellas de hemocultivo permite una gran recuperación de microorganismos.

Pus Samples in Complicated Appendicitis: An Important Investigation or a Waste of Resources: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:

Appendicitis is a common presentation to hospital with appendectomy being the treatment of choice. Pre-operative administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is common, but obtaining intra-abdominal pus samples is not. After an initial 6-month retrospective audit and departmental teaching on the importance of intra-peritoneal pus sampling, we aimed to determine whether intra-operative pus samples changed antibiotic management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Following the initial audit cycle, a 6-month prospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical data were collected on a predetermined proforma to assess the effectiveness of the intervention and antibiotic prescribing practice. The data collected during the whole 1-year period was analyzed.

RESULTS:

During the 1-year period, 440 patients were identified as undergoing a laparoscopic procedure. After exclusion, 261 patients were identified as undergoing laparoscopic appendectomies, of which 141 (54%) were classified as complicated laparoscopic appendectomies. A total of 35 out of 141 (25%) pus samples were sent of which 24 (17%) resulted in positive cultures, with only nine of these positive cultures reported prior to the patient being discharged. No patient had their antibiotic regimen changed as a result of the culture results. There were three cases of cultures resistant to local antibiotics, but without significant clinical outcome. One of these patients developed a post-operative complication, but the antibiotic regimen was changed to broad spectrum rather than a specific antibiotic based on culture sensitivity. Of the 141 patients with complicated laparoscopic appendectomies, five (3.5%) developed post-operative complications: one readmission requiring a laparoscopic washout for pelvic collection, three (2%) cases of pelvic collections managed conservatively, and one case of prolonged paralytic ileus managed non-operatively.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, none of the patients with positive cultures had a change in prescribed antibiotics based on culture results. Hence, the routine practice of intra-peritoneal pus sampling following complicated appendicitis remains of little clinical value.

Bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility in patients with acute appendicitis

PURPOSE

Essential treatment of acute appendicitis is surgical resection with the use of appropriate antibiotics. In order to effectively treat acute appendicitis, it is important to identify the microorganism of acute appendicitis and evaluate the effective antibiotics.

METHODS

A total of 694 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis and had positive microbial result between 2006 and 2015 were recruited. For microbial assessment, luminal contents of the appendix were swabbed after appendectomy. In patients with periappendiceal abscess, the specimens were obtained from abscess fluid. The patient characteristics, operative data, use of antibiotics, the results of microbiology, and postoperative morbidities including surgical site infection (SSI) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 38.2 (± 19.8) years, and 422 patients (60.8%) were male. Most of the operations were performed by conventional laparoscopy (83.1%), followed by single-port laparoscopy (11.8%). The most common microorganism was Escherichia coli (64.6%), which was susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, most cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam, and imipenem. The second most common microorganism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.4%), which was resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefotaxime. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 8.6%, and the most common type was superficial SSI (6.2%), followed by ileus (1.2%), gastroenteritis (0.7%), and organ/space SSI (0.3%). P. aeruginosa (odds ratio = 2.128, 95% confidence interval 1.077-4.206, P = 0.030) was the only significant microorganism associated with SSI according to multivariate analysis adjusting for other clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In perforated appendicitis, the use of empirical antibiotics seems to be safe. In some cases of Pseudomonas infection, adequate antibiotics should be considered.

Streptococcus anginosus is associated with postoperative intraabdominal collections in appendicitis

AIM OF STUDY

Streptococcus anginosus group (SA) (formerly Streptococcus milleri) are pathogens recognised to have a high risk of postoperative collection in appendicitis, although little data exist specifically in children. We performed a retrospective review of all microbiological data from appendicectomies to assess whether there was an association in children.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review of patients admitted to a paediatric tertiary centre coded for appendicitis from January 2015 to October 2016 was completed. Initial length of stay (LOS), cumulative hospital days, histology, microbiology, and radiology reports were recorded. The postoperative antibiotic regimen was based on surgeon's choice and not standardised.

MAIN RESULTS

231 children were identified, and 18 were excluded. In the remainder, 169 (78.9%) had positive microbiology cultures, and of these 45 were positive for SA (26.6%). There was no significant variation in monthly incidence (P=0.58). Patients with SA+ve cultures were associated with complicated appendicitis on histology (P=0.01), longer LOS and cumulative hospital days (P=0.001), and increased likelihood of developing postoperative collections (P=0.001). The relative risk of developing a postoperative collection with SA+ve cultures was 2.40. There was no difference in time to presentation, histology, or intervention between SA and non-SA patients who developed collections. All SA cultures were sensitive to penicillin and erythromycin.

CONCLUSION

SA cultured from intraoperative serial swabs is associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative collection (2.40). Using this information with standardisation of antimicrobial management may reduce the rate of postoperative complications in paediatric appendicitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II prognosis study.

Do Postoperative Antibiotics Prevent Abscess Formation in Complicated Appendicitis?

Recent studies have shown that postoperative antibiotics in nonperforated appendicitis do not reduce infectious complications; however, there is no consensus on patients with complicated appendicitis. The aim of this study is to determine whether postoperative antibiotic administration in complicated appendicitis prevents intra-abdominal abscess formation. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing appendectomy from 2007 to 2012 at our institution. Patients with complicated appendicitis (perforated, gangrenous, or periappendiceal abscess) were identified and data collected including details of postoperative antibiotic administration and rates of postoperative abscess development. Of 444 charts reviewed, 52 patients were included. Forty-four patients received greater than 24 hours and eight patients received 24 hours or less of postoperative antibiotics. In those receiving greater than 24 hours of antibiotics, nine of 44 (20.5%) developed a postoperative abscess, and in those receiving 24 hours or less of antibiotics, two of eight (25.0%) developed a postoperative abscess ( P = 1.0000). There is no significant difference in postoperative abscess development among those with complicated appendicitis who received greater than 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics compared with those who did not. Postoperative antibiotics may not provide an appreciable clinical benefit for preventing intra-abdominal abscesses; however, larger sample sizes and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Case-based review: conservative management of appendicitis--are we delaying the inevitable?

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical presentation for which surgical intervention, an appendicectomy, has remained a largely unchallenged primary treatment modality. Traditionally, it has been felt that the pathophysiological progressive nature of appendicitis ultimately leads to perforation. A number of recent studies, however, suggest that the process of appendiceal inflammation may follow a more remitting nature with evidence indicating spontaneous resolution. It is hypothesised that the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis may therefore be amenable to conservative management with antibiotics. This article aims to highlight some of the issues and challenges relating to the conservative management of acute appendicitis and further demonstrates potential diagnostic and treatment difficulties involved in managing the more unfamiliar condition of recurrent appendicitis.

Streptococcus milleri in intraabdominal abscesses in children after appendectomy: incidence and course

INTRODUCTION

Intraabdominal abscesses are a common complication after appendectomy, especially in children. In this study, we describe the incidence and course of this complication in relation to the cultured pathogens found in intraabdominal abscesses.

METHODS

The charts of all patients between 1 and 18 years of age undergoing appendectomy in 3 hospitals between January 2006, and July 2009, were retrospectively reviewed. Presence of an intraabdominal abscess was confirmed with abdominal ultrasound examination. We collected all details concerning the appendectomy, pus cultures, and postoperative course in these patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-nine patients underwent appendectomy during the study period. Subsequently, abdominal ultrasound studies showed an intraabdominal abscess in 18 (7%) patients. Intraabdominal abscesses developed more frequently after perforated appendicitis (23%) than after simple appendicitis (2%). The incidence of postoperative abscesses did not differ significantly between open (5.6%) or laparoscopic (6.3%) appendectomy. However, the rate was high (38%) in the patients in whom the appendectomy was converted from laparoscopic to open. In 15 out of the 18 patients with a postoperative abscess drainage was performed. In pus cultures of the drained abscesses Streptococcus milleri and Escherichia coli were the most commonly isolated pathogens. Presence of S milleri was associated with prolonged hospital stay (13.9 versus 9.0 days, P = .105) and prolonged antibiotic treatment (11.3 versus 4.8 days, P = .203).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of intraabdominal abscesses is high after perforated appendicitis in children (23%). Our data suggest that the presence of S milleri correlates with a more complicated postoperative course after appendectomy in children.

Peritoneal fluid culture in appendicitis: review in changing times

Appendicectomy is one of the commoner operations with a lifetime risk as high as 12% or 23% in males or females, respectively. Since the 1940s intra-operative intra-peritoneal swabs have commonly been taken from the appendix site, the spectrum of infecting organisms and their antibiotic sensitivity may be gauged from the culture results. This approach remains common but in recent years, studies have claimed that intra-peritoneal swabs are unnecessary; however, they relied upon retrospective patient groups predating wider use of laparoscopic appendicectomy, increasing numbers of immunocompromised people at risk of appendicitis and the clinical/medicolegal significance of increasing risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridium difficile colitis. Therefore, a key-word literature research was done to identify relevant publications from 1930 to June 2009. Newer features relating to intra-peritoneal swabs in appendicectomy have been discussed against this background information for periabdominal appendicectomy with or without appendicular perforation, laparoscopic appendicectomy and appendicectomy in the growing numbers of immunocompromised patients. All studies questioning the use of intra-peritoneal swabs were open, non-randomised, and retrospective with incompletely matched control groups, non-standardised swab collection techniques, and consequently lacked power to inform surgical practice. They concluded that an appropriately powered randomised, blinded, prospective, controlled clinical trial is needed to test for absolute efficacy in the use of peritoneal swabs in patient management. Until controlled trial data becomes available, it may be wise to continue peritoneal swabs at least in high-risk patients to decrease clinical and medicolegal risk.

Are routine peritoneal fluid cultures during appendicectomy justified?

BACKGROUND

To determine the impact of obtaining routine peritoneal fluid cultures during appendicectomy, on the treatment and the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The case notes of 137 consecutive patients having appendicectomy, selected from the microbiology database over a period of 1 year were reviewed. The microorganisms in peritoneal cultures, selection of antibiotics and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patients were subdivided into two groups; group I: uncomplicated appendicitis and group II: complicated appendicitis.

RESULTS

The study included 137 patients with a median age of 19 years. Cultures were obtained from 79.5% of patients (group I: 67/84, group II: 42/53). Cultures were positive in 28.3% (19/67) patients in group I and 69% (29/ 42) in group II. Wound infection (5.6%), prolonged ileus (7.5%) and intra-abdominal abscess (3.7%) were the recorded complications in group II. Antibiotics were modified in 3 out of 109 patients.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative peritoneal cultures during appendicectomy do not significantly contribute towards patient management.

Diagnosis and management of diverticulitis and appendicitis

Diverticulitis and appendicitis are common infections of the gastrointestinal tract that require urgent medical and surgical attention. Successful management of these conditions requires a multidisciplinary approach among primary care providers, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and radiologists. The diagnosis of appendicitis, in particular, can be difficult. Advances in radiographic imaging have improved the diagnostic accuracy in these infections. Minimally invasive surgical techniques have improved the patient's postoperative recovery when surgery is necessary in the management of these conditions.

Optimum duration of prophylactic antibiotics in acute non-perforated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

The effect of extended prophylactic antibiotic therapy on postoperative infective complications such as wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess for non-perforated appendicitis is poorly defined.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial of 269 patients aged 15-70 years with non-perforated appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy; 92 received single dose preoperative (group A), 94 received three-dose (group B) and 83 received 5-day perioperative (group C) regimens of cefuroxime and metronidazole. Postoperative infective complication was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and complications related to antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

The rate of postoperative infective complication was not significantly different among the groups (6.5% group A, 6.4% group B, 3.6% group C). The duration of antibiotic therapy had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Complications related to antibiotic treatment were significantly more common for 5-day perioperative antibiotic group (C) compared with single dose preoperative antibiotic group (A) (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Single dose of preoperative antibiotics is adequate for prevention of postoperative infective complications in patients with non-perforated appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy. Prolonging the use of antibiotics can lead to unnecessary antibiotic related complications.

Minimum postoperative antibiotic duration in advanced appendicitis in children: a review

The suitable duration of antibiotic use following appendectomy for advanced appendicitis in children is still debated. A systematic review was performed, including published experimental and observational data of antibiotic use in children who had undergone appendectomy for advanced appendicitis. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined criteria. Twenty-eight studies were selected that included 2,284 patients. There was no consistency among the protocols regarding length of antibiotic use, discharge criteria, or use of home antibiotics following discharge. Limiting duration of antibiotic use to 3 days did not appear to be associated with higher rates of intraabdominal abscess or wound infection. In the absence of higher-level evidence, shortening of antibiotic regimens following surgery for pediatric complicated appendicitis appears to be safe.

Innate immunity genes influence the severity of acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

Using acute appendicitis as a model, we tested the hypothesis that polymorphisms in genes involved in host defense can be associated with the severity of local infection-inflammation in humans.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Innate immunity is the body's front-line system for antimicrobial host defense. Local inflammation is a major innate immune mechanism for containing and destroying microbes, but it may also contribute to tissue injury.

METHODS

We studied 134 patients with acute appendicitis treated at an urban hospital. We looked for associations between the severity of appendicitis (uncomplicated vs. perforated or gangrenous), plasma and peritoneal cytokine concentrations, and single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes involved in recognizing bacterial molecules [CD14 (-159 C-->T); TLR4 (896 A-->G)] and in mounting an inflammatory response [IL-6 (-174 G-->C), TNF-alpha (-308 G-->A), IL-1beta (-31 C -->T)].

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients (68%) had uncomplicated appendicitis and 43 (32%) had complicated disease. The SNPs in the CD14, TLR4, IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha genes were not associated with the severity of appendicitis. A strong association was found between C-allele carriage at -174 in the IL-6 gene and decreased risk of complicated disease (adjusted odds ratio = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07-0.76). Lower plasma and peritoneal fluid IL-6 concentrations in the IL-6 -174 C-carriers than in the GG homozygotes suggest that this polymorphism contributes to decreased IL-6 production in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymorphism in the IL-6 gene was associated with the severity of appendicitis, even after adjustment for duration of symptoms. The risk for developing appendiceal perforation or gangrene may be determined, in part, by variation in the IL-6 gene.

Intestinal obstruction and perforation--the role of the surgeon

Intestinal obstruction and perforation are always a challenge for the surgeon, not only in respect to the surgical option offered to the patient, but also to the ability to accurately diagnose and stage the disease. The understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanism is also very important in order to classify each patient in order to receive the more appropriate treatment. Mechanisms of obstruction and perforation, methods of diagnosis as well as prevention and treatment of the disease were reviewed.

Standardized patient care guidelines reduce infectious morbidity in appendectomy patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess remain common infectious complications after appendectomy, especially in the setting of a perforated or gangrenous appendix. We therefore developed a clinical protocol for the management of appendicitis to decrease postoperative infectious complications.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 1999, 206 patients with appendicitis were treated on protocol. Retrospectively, the charts were reviewed for all protocol patients as well as for 232 patients with appendicitis treated in the year prior to protocol initiation. Data were collected on surgical wound infections and intra-abdominal abscesses.

RESULTS

There were significantly fewer infectious complications in the protocol group than in the nonprotocol group (20 [9%] versus 8 [4%]; P <0.05). In patients with a perforated or gangrenous appendix, the infectious complication rate was reduced from 33% to 13% (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of infectious complications after appendectomy can be significantly reduced with a standardized approach to antibiotic therapy and wound management.