Results from a biomarker study to accompany a phase II trial of RRx-001 with reintroduced platinum-based chemotherapy in relapsed small cell carcinoma

Anti-tumor and anti-metastatic effects of RRx-001 on hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential

Background

1-Bromoacetyl-3,3-dinitroazetidine (RRx-001) has potent antitumor effects, indicating its promising therapeutic potential against various cancers. This research investigates RRx-001 activity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elucidates its underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Huh7, Hepa1-6, and MHCC97H cells were cultured and treated with varying RRx-001 concentrations for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using cell counting kit-8. The cells were divided into control and RRx-001 treatment groups at 0.5 × IC50, 1.0 × IC50, and 2.0 × IC50 concentrations for each cell line. Migration and invasion were evaluated using scratch and Transwell assays, and apoptosis was examined by apoptosis assays. RNA sequencing was performed on the Huh7 cells treated with RRx-001 for 24 h to identify differential gene expression. CD47 and TP53 protein levels were measured by Western blot. A xenograft mouse model was utilized to evaluate the effect of RRx-001 on HCC.

Results

RRx-001 inhibits HCC cell viability, migration, and invasion while inducing apoptosis, These effects are potentially mediated by the downregulation of CD47 and the upregulation of TP53, both of which modulate key signaling pathways. In vivo experiments demonstrated that RRx-001 effectively inhibits tumor growth.

Conclusion

RRx-001 reduces the viability of HCC cells and induces apoptosis. This effect may be due to the downregulation of CD47 expression and the alteration of the TP53 protein regulatory pathway.

Targeting tumor-associated macrophages to reverse antitumor drug resistance

Currently, antitumor drugs show limited clinical outcomes, mainly due to adaptive resistance. Clinical evidence has highlighted the importance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in tumor response to conventional antitumor drugs. Preclinical studies show that TAMs following antitumor agent can be reprogrammed to an immunosuppressive phenotype and proangiogenic activities through different mechanisms, mediating drug resistance and poor prognosis. Potential extrinsic inhibitors targeting TAMs repolarize to an M1-like phenotype or downregulate proangiogenic function, enhancing therapeutic efficacy of anti-tumor therapy. Moreover, pharmacological modulation of macrophages that restore the immune stimulatory characteristics is useful to reshaping the tumor microenvironment, thus further limiting tumor growth. This review aims to introduce macrophage response in tumor therapy and provide a potential therapeutic combination strategy of TAM-targeting immunomodulation with conventional antitumor drugs.

Tumor-associated macrophages affect the treatment of lung cancer

As one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, lung cancer has limited benefits for patients despite its diverse treatment methods due to factors such as personalized medicine targeting histological type, immune checkpoint expression, and driver gene mutations. The high mortality rate of lung cancer is partly due to the immune-suppressive which limits the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs and induces tumor cell resistance. The currently widely recognized TAM phenotypes include the anti-tumor M1 and pro-tumor M2 phenotypes. M2 macrophages promote the formation of an immune-suppressive microenvironment and hinder immune cell infiltration, thereby inhibiting activation of the anti-tumor immune system and aiding tumor cells in resisting treatment. Analyzing the relationship between different treatment methods and macrophages in the TME can help us better understand the impact of TAMs on lung cancer and confirm the feasibility of targeted TAM therapy. Targeting TAMs to reduce the M2/M1 ratio and reverse the immune-suppressive microenvironment can improve the clinical efficacy of conventional treatment methods and potentially open up more efficient combination treatment strategies, maximizing the benefit for lung cancer patients.

The impact of nitric oxide on HER family post-translational modification and downstream signaling in cancer

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family consists of four members, activated by two families of ligands. They are known for mediating cell-cell interactions in organogenesis, and their deregulation has been associated with various cancers, including breast and esophageal cancers. In particular, aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 signaling drive disease progression and result in poorer patient outcomes. Nitric oxide (NO) has been proposed as an alternative activator of the HER family and may play a role in this aberrant activation due to its ability to induce s-nitrosation and phosphorylation of the EGFR. This review discusses the potential impact of NO on HER family activation and downstream signaling, along with its role in the efficacy of therapeutics targeting the family.

[Tumor-associated Macrophage: Emerging Targets for Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment]

Tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) play a crucial role in the immune microenvironment of lung cancer. Through changes in their phenotype and phagocytic functions, TAM contribute to the initiation and progression of lung cancer. By promoting the formation of an immune-suppressive microenvironment and accelerating the growth of abnormal tumor vasculature, TAM facilitate the invasion and metastasis of lung cancer. Macrophages can polarize into different subtypes with distinct functions and characteristics in response to various stimuli, categorized as anti-tumor M1 and pro-tumor M2 types. In tumor tissues, TAM typically polarize into the alternatively activated M2 phenotype, exhibiting inhibitory effects on tumor immunity. This article reviews the role of anti-angiogenic drugs in modulating TAM phenotypes, highlighting their potential to reprogram M2-type TAM into an anti-tumor M1 phenotype. Additionally, the functional alterations of TAM play a significant role in anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy strategies. In summary, the regulation of TAM polarization and function opens up new avenues for lung cancer treatment and may serve as a novel target for modulating the immune microenvironment of tumors.
.

Data Management 101 for drug developers: A peek behind the curtain

In drug development a frequently used phrase is "data-driven". Just as high-test gas fuels a car, so drug development "runs on" high-quality data; hence, good data management practices, which involve case report form design, data entry, data capture, data validation, medical coding, database closure, and database locking, are critically important. This review covers the essentials of clinical data management (CDM) for the United States. It is intended to demystify CDM, which means nothing more esoteric than the collection, organization, maintenance, and analysis of data for clinical trials. The review is written with those who are new to drug development in mind and assumes only a passing familiarity with the terms and concepts that are introduced. However, its relevance may also extend to experienced professionals that feel the need to brush up on the basics. For added color and context, the review includes real-world examples with RRx-001, a new molecular entity in phase III and with fast-track status in head and neck cancer, and AdAPT-001, an oncolytic adenovirus armed with a transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) trap in a phase I/II clinical trial with which the authors, as employees of the biopharmaceutical company, EpicentRx, are closely involved. An alphabetized glossary of key terms and acronyms used throughout this review is also included for easy reference.

New hope for tumor immunotherapy: the macrophage-related "do not eat me" signaling pathway

The "do not eat me" signaling pathway is extremely active in tumor cells, providing a means for these cells to elude macrophage phagocytosis and escape immune surveillance. Representative markers of this pathway, such as CD47 and CD24, are highly expressed in numerous tumors. The interaction of SIRPα with CD47 reduces the accumulation of non-myosin ⅡA on the cell membrane. The combination of CD24 and Siglec10 ultimately leads to the recruitment of SHP-1 or SHP-2 to reduce signal transduction. Both of them weaken the ability of macrophages to engulf tumor cells. Blocking the mutual recognition between CD47-SIRPα or CD24-Siglec10 using large molecular proteins or small molecular drugs represents a promising avenue for tumor immunotherapy. Doing so can inhibit signal transduction and enhance macrophage clearance rates of cancer cells. In this paper, we summarize the characteristics of the drugs that affect the "do not eat me" signaling pathway via classical large molecular proteins and small molecule drugs, which target the CD47-SIRPα and CD24-Siglec10 signaling pathways, which target the CD47-SIRPα and CD24-Siglec10 signaling pathways. We expect it will offer insight into the development of new drugs centered on blocking the "do not eat me" signaling pathway.

RRx-001: a chimeric triple action NLRP3 inhibitor, Nrf2 inducer, and nitric oxide superagonist

RRx-001 is a shape shifting small molecule with Fast Track designation for the prevention/amelioration of chemoradiation-induced severe oral mucositis (SOM) in newly diagnosed Head and Neck cancer. It has been intentionally developed or "engineered" as a chimeric single molecular entity that targets multiple redox-based mechanisms. Like an antibody drug conjugate (ADC), RRx-001 contains, at one end a "targeting" moiety, which binds to the NLRP3 inflammasome and inhibits it as well as Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), the negative regulator of Nrf2, and, at the other end, a conformationally constrained, dinitro containing 4 membered ring, which fragments under conditions of hypoxia and reduction to release therapeutically active metabolites i.e., the payload. This "payload", which is delivered specifically to hypoperfused and inflamed areas, includes nitric oxide, nitric oxide related species and carbon-centered radicals. As observed with ADCs, RRx-001 contains a backbone amide "linker" attached to a binding site, which correlates with the F_ab region of an antibody, and to the dinitroazetidine payload, which is microenvironmentally activated. However, unlike ADCs, whose large size impacts their pharmacokinetic properties, RRx-001 is a nonpolar small molecule that easily crosses cell membranes and the blood brain barrier (BBB) and distributes systemically. This short review is organized around the de novo design and in vivo pro-oxidant/pro-inflammatory and antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activity of RRx-001, which, in turn, depends on the reduced to oxidized glutathione ratio and the oxygenation status of tissues.

Phase 1 pilot study of RRx-001 + nivolumab in patients with advanced metastatic cancer (PRIMETIME)

Background

Bromonitrozidine (RRx-001) is a minimally toxic, NLRP3 inhibitor that has been observed, in experimental systems, to also downregulate CD47, repolarize tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) and normalize aberrant tumor perfusion. This phase 1 pilot study was undertaken to determine the safety and feasibility of RRx-001 and nivolumab in patients with advanced cancer and no standard options.

Methods

This single arm, single site, open-label pilot study (NCT02518958) called PRIMETIME was designed to evaluate the safety profile of RRx-001 and nivolumab in patients with advanced malignancies and no other standard therapeutic options. A 3 + 3 trial design was used to establish safety of the combination at each dose level and guide the decision to escalate dose. RRx-001 is infused once weekly while nivolumab is given at 3mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The RRx-001 starting dose was 2 mg IV weekly with 4 dose level escalations up to 16 mg IV weekly. From January 2015 to November 2015, twelve patients received treatment for only 4 cycles (total 12 weeks) with the combination due to unavailability of nivolumab, which was not supplied to the Sponsor. Treatment-emergent (all cause, TEAEs) and treatment-related (TRAEs) adverse events that occurred within 16 weeks of the first dose of RRx-001 and nivolumab were characterized according to CTCAE v4.03.

Results

Twelve patients received ≥1 dose of RRx-001 and nivolumab. One discontinuation occurred due to pneumonitis and one to voluntary withdrawal after a post-procedural infection. There were no DLTs. The main adverse event related to RRx-001 was infusion reaction (33.3%). The main adverse event related to the combination was pseudoprogression manifested by larger tumors in patients that were symptomatically improved (25%). The most common immune-related treatment-emergent AEs were pneumonitis (8.3%), and hypothyroidism (8.3%). The objective response rate at 12 weeks was 25% and the disease control rate (DCR) consisting of ≥SD was 67% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. 25% of the patients progressed on the combination.

Conclusions

The combination of RRx-001 and nivolumab was safe and well-tolerated with preliminary evidence of anti-cancer activity. Further clinical trials with RRx-001 and nivolumab are warranted.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02518958.

Roles for macrophage-polarizing interleukins in cancer immunity and immunotherapy

Macrophages are the most abundant and one of the most critical cells of tumor immunity. They provide a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity through releasing cytokines into the tumor microenvironment (TME). A number of interleukin (IL) cytokine family members is involved in shaping the final phenotype of macrophages toward either a classically-activated pro-inflammatory M1 state with anti-tumor activity or an alternatively-activated anti-inflammatory M2 state with pro-tumor activity. Shaping TME macrophages toward the M1 phenotype or recovering this phenotypic state may offer a promising therapeutic approach in patients with cancer. Here, we focus on the impact of macrophage-polarizing ILs on immune cells and IL-mediated cellular cross-interactions within the TME. The key aim of this review is to define therapeutic schedules for addressing ILs in cancer immunotherapy based on their multi-directional impacts in such a milieu. Gathering more knowledge on this area is also important for defining adverse effects related to cytokine therapy and addressing them for reinforcing the efficacy of immunotherapy against cancer.