Hormonal contraception in women with endometriosis: a systematic review

The efficacy of progestins in managing pain associated with endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Alongside being contraceptives, progestins have been investigated as potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic therapies for use in painful gynaecological conditions. This review aims to synthesise evidence pertaining to the efficacy of progestins as analgesics for use in endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the extant literature investigating the analgesic efficacy of progestins compared to any comparator interventions for individuals with the three specified gynaecological conditions. The search was carried out across the PubMed and CENTRAL databases on 7 April 2024 for randomised control trials (RCTs) published in the peer-reviewed literature from 2000 onwards. Data pertaining to analgesic efficacy, assessed by changes in pain indices/scores before and after treatment, were synthesised narratively. Data pertaining to adverse effect frequency and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) were also synthesised narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool.

RESULTS

The primary search identified 1220 potentially eligible RCTs of which 21 were ultimately included; 19 RCTs related to endometriosis, two related to fibroids and zero related to PMS. Quality assessment identified nine studies to be at a low risk of bias, nine studies with some concerns surrounding bias and three studies to be at a high risk of bias. The included studies represented a total of 2745 participants of whom 1317 were treated with a progestin and 1428 received a comparator intervention. In 18 of the 19 studies concerning endometriosis, progestins produced a statistically significant reduction in pain, further, in five instances progestins were more efficacious in reducing pain than comparator interventions. In both studies on fibroids, progestins produced significant reductions in pain, however, statistically significant differences compared to comparator interventions were not demonstrated. The most frequently cited adverse effect of progestins was spotting/irregular bleeding whilst those receiving comparator interventions most often reported hot flushes; cited in 12 and seven studies respectively. Five studies assessed the impact of progestins and comparators on BMD. Three studies found progestins significantly reduced BMD, however, in these instances reductions were significantly lower than those produced by comparator interventions and in two studies were not statistically significant after 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our review demonstrates the potential scope for the use of progestins as analgesics in the management of pain associated with endometriosis. Further research will need to be conducted to identify their efficacy in the management of pain associated with fibroids and PMS.

Patient satisfaction with two different management modalities for erratic bleeding during continuous hormone therapy for endometriosis-associated symptoms: A before-after study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient satisfaction with the management of erratic bleeding during continuous hormone therapy for endometriosis using two different strategies: an active approach (tailored cycling), which involved discontinuation of the therapy; and a passive approach, which involved waiting for spontaneous resolution of the bleeding.

METHODS

This was an observational before-after study. All patients enrolled within a previously defined time limit were instructed to adopt a passive strategy to manage erratic bleeding, while all patients enrolled after that defined time were instructed to discontinue therapy for 7 days (tailored cycling). Degree of satisfaction, characteristics of bleeding, and level of dysmenorrhoea were compared and analysed at the time of enrolment and after 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients were included in the study. Satisfaction was 29% higher among patients in the passive strategy group compared with those in the tailored cycling group; this difference was significant. No significant differences were identified for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients may be more satisfied with the use of a passive approach to manage irregular bleeding during continuous hormone therapy for endometriosis-associated pain. All patients should be provided with comprehensive information regarding all available management strategies for unpredictable irregular bleeding. This will enable patients to make informed decisions based on their personal experience and preferences, without external pressure, thus improving compliance, adherence and, ideally, satisfaction with treatment.

The connection between endometriosis and secondary dysmenorrhea

Endometriosis (EMS) is a prevalent gynecological condition characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, often leading to secondary dysmenorrhea (SD), chronic pelvic pain and infertility. This review explores the intricate connection between EMS- associated pain and SD, focusing on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying dysmenorrhea in EMS. Key contributors to pain include inflammation, aberrant immune responses, neurogenic inflammation, peritoneal irritation, peripheral sensitization, central sensitization and cross-organ sensitization. Understanding the pain pathways in EMS highlights the complexity of symptom manifestation and underscores the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to management. Clinical manifestations, including chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, infertility, gastrointestinal and bladder symptoms, fatigue and malaise, are discussed, emphasizing the diverse impact of EMS on women's health. Various treatment modalities, ranging from pharmacological interventions to surgical and complementary approaches, are outlined to provide comprehensive management strategies for EMS-related menstrual pain/SD. This review aims to enhance understanding and facilitate the effective management of EMS-associated SD, ultimately improving the quality of life for affected individuals.

Novel screening approach for stem cell selective inhibitors and their possible translational therapeutic potential for endometriosis

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent benign disease characterized by growth of the endometrial tissue outside the uterine wall. Several reports suggest the possibility of the pathogenesis and recurrence of endometriosis being related to functions of stem/progenitor cells of the endometrium. The drawback of the widely used method of using Hoechst 33342, a fluorescent dye, to collect stem cell-like populations, is the requirement of an ultraviolet (UV) excitation source not commonly provided on standard flow cytometers. Here, we aimed to overcome this hurdle by establishing a novel method that uses DyeCycle Green (DCG), a cell-permeable DNA dye, for collecting a significantly higher fraction of stem cell-like side population (SP) from HHUA cells (human endometrial cancer cell line) with standard equipment without a UV laser. Furthermore, subculturing the DCG-SP cells expanded their population remarkably. The DCG-SP cells possessed stem cell-like characteristics with high expression of stem cell markers such as aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 A (ALDH1A), sushi domain containing 2 (SUSD2), increased colony formation ability, and high tumorigenicity in vivo, although the expression of some stem cell markers varied during expansion. We screened inhibitors for selective proliferation of the DCG-SP cells over immortalized endometrial cells (EM-E6/E7/hTERT-2 cells) and identified two effective compounds disulfiram and NSC319726. In addition, these compounds inhibited the colony formation and invasiveness of the DCG-SP cells. Our DCG-mediated screening of SP cells would possibly be translational to identify compounds that selectively target stem cells for the treatment and inhibition of recurrence of endometriosis.

Endometriosis in Adolescence: A Narrative Review of the Psychological and Clinical Implications

Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory condition where endometrial-like tissue grows outside the uterus, affecting around 10% of women of reproductive age. This condition is associated with debilitating symptoms, including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, fatigue, and infertility. Adolescents with endometriosis face unique challenges, as the disease is often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed for an average of 7-10 years due to its complex and multifactorial nature. Consequently, patients frequently suffer from worsening symptoms and significant psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal. While there is no definitive cure for endometriosis, treatment approaches typically involve hormonal therapies, lifestyle adjustments (such as diet and exercise), and psychological support. Recent studies emphasize the profound impact of endometriosis on the mental health of adolescents, highlighting the need for a more holistic treatment approach that integrates both medical and psychological care. This narrative review explores the psychological and psychosocial effects of endometriosis in adolescents, examining the biological and psychological mechanisms linking the disease to mental health outcomes. It also discusses current therapeutic strategies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness, and peer support, and underscores the importance of early diagnosis and multidisciplinary care to mitigate both the physical and emotional burdens of the condition. This integrated approach is critical in improving the overall well-being and quality of life for adolescents living with endometriosis.

The effect of combined oral contraceptive pills on angiogenesis in endometriotic lesions

PURPOSE

Neoangiogenesis is necessary for adhesion and invasion of endometriotic lesions. We hypothesize that by blocking angiogenetic pathways we can suppress endometriosis. Oral contraceptive pills (OCs) are routinely used in endometriosis to suppress symptoms of the disease. In the current study, we attempt to evaluate the effects of OCs on various angiogenetic factors in women with endometriosis.

METHODS

Sixty women with endometriosis were randomly divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 30 women who received OCs in a cyclical manner for 3 months before surgery and group B of 30 women who did not. Biopsy specimens of ovarian endometrioma were collected. We used qRT-PCR to study the mRNA expression levels of VEGF, TF, PAR-2, SP1, and FGF1.

RESULTS

The levels of mRNA of all angiogenic factors were found to be elevated in women who received OCs compared with women who did not. This difference was statistically significant for VEGF, TF, FGF1, SP1 (p < 0.001), and PAR-2 (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

OC administration does not inhibit neoangiogenesis in endometriotic lesions; on the contrary, angiogenetic pathways might be upregulated.

Advances in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis: A comprehensive review

Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological condition characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, leading to chronic pelvic pain and infertility. This review aims to shed light on the latest advancements in diagnosing and managing endometriosis. It offers insight into the condition's pathogenesis, clinical symptoms, diagnostic techniques, and available treatment approaches. Furthermore, the article emphasizes innovative technologies and novel therapeutic strategies that promise to enhance patient outcomes significantly. This review aspires to empower clinicians to deliver the highest quality care to their patients affected by this challenging condition by consolidating the current understanding of endometriosis.

Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of five combined oral contraceptives (COCs) - ethinylestradiol (EE) 30 μg/dienogest (DNG) 2 mg, EE 20 μg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg, 17β-estradiol (E2) 1.5 mg/nomegestrol acetate (NomAc) 2.5 mg,estetrol (E4) 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg and estradiol valerate (E2V)/DNG - and DNG 2 mg daily in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain (CPP), dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was performed from October 2018 to March 2023. A database was set up to collect data from women in each of the six treatment groups. The level of endometriotic pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Follow-up was performed at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The intragroup analysis showed an improvement in the VAS score from baseline to 6-month follow-up for each group (p < 0.001). Intergroup analysis showed that women on COCs containing E2 or E4 had a greater improvement in CCP than women on COCs containing EE (at 3 months, p ≤ 0.001; at 6 months, p ≤ 0.009). Women on E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg showed a similar improvement to women on DNG at both 3- and 6-month follow-up, and greater improvement compared with women on COCs containing E2 at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.02). Greater improvement in dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia was seen in women on COCs containing E2 and E4, and DNG compared with women on COCs containing EE (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

COCs containing E2 or E4 could be a better treatment for women with endometriosis-associated pain than COCs containing EE. They may represent a suitable alternative to the use of DNG, particularly for women who do not want to become pregnant.

The oral GnRH antagonists, a new class of drugs in gynecology: from pharmacokinetics to possible clinical applications

INTRODUCTION

In ovarian steroid-dependent diseases such as uterine fibroids, endometriosis and adenomyosis, oral GnRH antagonists have emerged as new therapeutic alternatives. These oral GnRH antagonists offer key advantages, including oral administration, dose-dependent estrogen suppression and rapid reversibility.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the pharmacological, clinical and therapeutic profiles of the latest non-peptide oral GnRH antagonists, through an analysis of clinical evidence and randomized clinical trials, to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of their clinical applications and potential benefits.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical trials examined demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in women with fibroids and pelvic pain in women with endometriosis, with more than 70% of patients achieving primary endpoints. The use of add-back therapy minimized bone mass density loss, ensuring long-term safety. Adverse events were dose-dependent but generally well tolerated. In our opinion, the strength of oral GnRH antagonists lies in their pharmacological properties. Oral administration increases convenience, allows adjustable dosing and ensures a dose-dependent effect. These drugs provide an immediate antagonistic effect without the flare-up phenomenon. Furthermore, they are expected to act on ectopic endometrial and smooth muscle cell receptors, potentially providing additional anti-proliferative effects. However, further research is needed: long term clinical trials must compare them with existing treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogens versus the combined oral contraceptives pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain following surgery: an economic evaluation alongside the PRE-EMPT trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogens (LAP), including levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), compared with the combined oral contraceptives pill (COCP) in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain postsurgery.

DESIGN

Within-trial economic evaluation alongside a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial (Preventing Recurrence of Endometriosis by means of Long-Acting Progestogen Therapy trial).

SETTING

Thirty-four UK hospitals recruiting participants from November 2015 to March 2019.

PATIENTS

Four hundred and five women aged 16-45 years undergoing conservative endometriosis surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The ratio of 1:1 randomisation to receive LAPs (LNG-IUS or DMPA) or COCP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary evaluation was a cost-utility analysis based on cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained at 3 years. We adopted a UK National Health Service perspective. Secondary analyses in the form of cost-effectiveness analysis based on a range of outcomes were also undertaken.

RESULTS

For the primary analysis, the COCP group incurred an additional cost of £533 (95% CI £52 to £983) per woman compared with LAPs. Treatment with COCP generated additional QALYs of 0.031 (95% CI -0.079 to 0.139) compared with the LAP group over 36-month follow-up. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for COCP compared with LAPs is therefore approximately £17 193 per QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that there was a 54.7% probability that COCP would be cost-effective at the £20 000/QALY threshold. The secondary analyses revealed results more in favour of LAPs.

CONCLUSION

Although the COCP has a slightly higher probability of being cost-effective at £20 000/QALY threshold, there remains considerable uncertainty, with only marginal differences in outcomes between the two treatments. The lower rates of further surgery and second-line medical treatment for women allocated to LAPs may make this option preferable for some women.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 97865475.

Assessing the impact of hormonal contraceptive use on menstrual health among women of reproductive age - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Contraceptive methods are well-established in their ability to prevent pregnancy and increase individual agency in childbearing. Evidence suggests that contraceptives can also be used to treat adverse conditions associated with menstruation, including abnormal and prolonged uterine bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, painful menstruation, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and premenstrual dysphoric disorders.This review investigates the effects of contraceptive techniques such as contraceptive pills, and long-acting reversible contraceptives (e.g. intrauterine devices, implants) on menstrual morbidity.

METHODS

Over ten databases with no geographical boundaries were searched from inception until October 2023. Study designs were one of the following types to be included: parallel or cluster randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series studies, cohort or longitudinal analyses, regression discontinuity designs, and case-control studies. Ten team members screened the papers in pairs with a Kappa score of more than 7, and Covidence was used. Conflicts were resolved by discussion, and the full papers were divided among the reviewers to extract the data from eligible studies.

RESULTS

Hormonal contraceptives are considered a well-tolerated, non-invasive, and clinically effective treatment for abnormal and prolonged uterine bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, painful menstruation, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and premenstrual dysphoric disorders. Our studies investigating quality of life or well-being in women with heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis, or uterine fibroids have found improvements in all dimensions assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormonal contraceptives significantly reduce pain, symptom severity, and abnormal bleeding patterns associated with women who suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids.

Preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain by means of long-acting progestogen therapy: the PRE-EMPT RCT

Background

Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women, many of whom have surgery for persistent pain. Recurrence of symptoms following an operation is common. Although hormonal treatment can reduce this risk, there is uncertainty about the best option.

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogen therapy compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain and quality of life.

Design

A multicentre, open, randomised trial with parallel economic evaluation. The final design was informed by a pilot study, qualitative exploration of women's lived experience of endometriosis and a pretrial economic model.

Setting

Thirty-four United Kingdom hospitals.

Participants

Women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis.

Interventions

Long-acting progestogen reversible contraceptive (either 150 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) or combined oral contraceptive pill (30 µg ethinylestradiol, 150 µg levonorgestrel).

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire at 36 months post randomisation. The economic evaluation estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained.

Results

Four hundred and five women were randomised to receive either long-acting reversible contraceptive (N = 205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (N = 200). Pain scores improved in both groups (24 and 23 points on average) compared with preoperative values but there was no difference between the two (adjusted mean difference: -0.8, 95% confidence interval -5.7 to 4.2; p = 0.76). The long-acting reversible contraceptive group underwent fewer surgical procedures or second-line treatments compared with the combined oral contraceptive group (73 vs. 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00). The mean adjusted quality-adjusted life-year difference between two arms was 0.043 (95% confidence interval -0.069 to 0.152) in favour of the combined oral contraceptive pill, although this cost an additional £533 (95% confidence interval 52 to 983) per woman.

Limitations

Limitations include the absence of a no-treatment group and the fact that many women changed treatments over the 3 years of follow-up. Use of telephone follow-up to collect primary outcome data in those who failed to return questionnaires resulted in missing data for secondary outcomes. The COVID pandemic may have affected rates of further surgical treatment.

Conclusions

At 36 months, women allocated to either intervention had comparable levels of pain, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement from presurgical levels. Although the combined oral contraceptive was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the difference between the two was marginal and lower rates of repeat surgery might make long-acting reversible contraceptives preferable to some women.

Future work

Future research needs to focus on evaluating newer hormonal preparations, a more holistic approach to symptom suppression and identification of biomarkers to diagnose endometriosis and its recurrence.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN97865475. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97865475.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 11/114/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 55. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. The NIHR recognises that people have diverse gender identities, and in this report, the word 'woman' is used to describe patients or individuals whose sex assigned at birth was female, whether they identify as female, male or non-binary.

Bladder Endometriosis: What do we know and what is left to find out? A narrative review

Bladder endometriosis accounts for 70-85% of urinary tract endometriosis cases. Urinary tract endometriosis occurs in approximately 1% of those living with endometriosis. Underlying aetiology and pathogenesis are not fully understood, but there are several plausible theories. As well as the typical pain symptoms, those with bladder endometriosis can experience several urinary tract symptoms. The manifestation of these symptoms can have complex pathways and processes. Imaging is accurate in the diagnosis of bladder endometriosis and clinicians should be mindful of the risk of silent kidney loss. Management should be guided by symptoms; both medical and surgical options are feasible. Surgical management offers potentially definitive treatment. Excisional surgery via bladder shave or partial cystectomy offers good improvement in symptoms with relatively low rates of serious complications and recurrence.

Norethindrone-Associated Transaminitis in Endometriosis Patients: A Case Series and Literature Review

In this case series, we discuss 10 cases of norethindrone-induced transaminitis and conduct a literature review of this rare adverse event. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 10 patients (median age: 33 years) with diverse endometriosis phenotypes who received norethindrone and subsequently developed transaminitis, which is defined as elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels. This condition was diagnosed in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, either during the work-up of acute symptoms or incidentally through routine lab tests. Our objective was to assess and characterize a case series of transaminitis associated with norethindrone use in endometriosis patients, detailing clinical presentations, management strategies, and outcomes. All cases exhibited normalization of liver function tests after discontinuation, occurring within one to 12 months with varying intervals of liver function testing. Patients receiving higher dosages (10 mg daily) demonstrated quicker resolution (average: four months). The reported adverse effects included nausea, vomiting, headache, rash, polyarthralgia, and abnormal uterine bleeding. Vigilant management, including prompt discontinuation, consistently resulted in the resolution of transaminitis. This study underscores the importance of continuous monitoring of liver function, even in asymptomatic patients on norethindrone therapy. Further investigations are imperative to identify specific groups susceptible to this adverse event.

The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on the Incidence and Progression of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women: A Systematic Review

This systematic review examines the impact of hormonal contraceptives on the incidence and progression of cardiovascular diseases in women. We analyzed 14 high-quality studies published between 1998 and 2018, including meta-analyses, cohort studies, case-control studies, and systematic reviews. The aim was to synthesize the current understanding of the relationship between various hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular risks, focusing on outcomes such as venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction. The 14 selected studies represent a comprehensive and diverse body of evidence, allowing for a nuanced analysis of the topic. Our findings indicate that combined oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, with the magnitude of risk varying based on estrogen dose, progestogen type, and individual risk factors. The review of these studies highlights the importance of personalized risk assessment in contraceptive counseling and prescribing practices. By synthesizing data from these key studies, we provide a consolidated view of the current state of knowledge regarding hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular health, offering valuable insights for both clinicians and researchers in the field.

Effect of Oral Contraceptive Use in Relation to Fertile Years on the Risk of Endometriosis in Women with Primary Infertility: A Ten-Year Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: Oral contraceptives (OCs) are usually used to treat endometriosis; however, the evidence is inconsistent about whether OC use in the past, when given to asymptomatic women, is protective against the development of future disease. We aimed to assess the relationship between the use of OCs and the likelihood of discovering endometriosis, considering the length of time under OCs during their fertile age. Materials and Methods: This was a monocentric retrospective cohort study in a tertiary-care University Hospital (Department of Human Reproduction, Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia) carried out from January 2012 to December 2022. Reproductive-aged women scheduled for laparoscopic surgery for primary infertility and subsequent histopathological diagnosis of endometriosis were compared to women without an endometriosis diagnosis. They were classified based on the ratio of years of OC use to fertile years in four subgroups: never, <25%, between 25 and 50%, and >50. Results: In total, 1923 women (390 with and 1533 without endometriosis) were included. Previous OC use was higher in those with endometriosis than controls (72.31% vs. 58.64%; p = 0.001). Overall, previous OC usage was not related to histopathological diagnosis of endometriosis (aOR 1.06 [95% CI 0.87-1.29]). Women who used OCs for less than 25% of their fertile age had reduced risk of rASRM stage III endometriosis (aOR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26-0.95]; p = 0.036) or superficial implants (aOR 0.88 [95% CI 0.58-0.95]; p = 0.040). No significant results were retrieved for other rASRM stages. Using OCs for <25%, between 25 and 50%, or >50% of fertile age did not increase the risk of developing superficial endometriosis, endometriomas, or DIE. Conclusions: When OCs are used at least once, histological diagnoses of endometriosis are not increased. A protective effect of OCs when used for less than 25% of fertile age on superficial implants may be present. Prospective research is needed to corroborate the findings due to constraints related to the study's limitations.

Estetrol Inhibits Endometriosis Development in an In Vivo Murine Model

Endometriosis is characterized by the growth of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, and it is associated with alterations in the expression of hormone receptors and inflammation. Estetrol (E4) is a weak estrogen that recently has been approved for contraception. We evaluated the effect of E4 on the growth of endometriotic-like lesions and the expression of TNF-α, estrogen receptors (ERs), and progesterone receptors (PRs) in an in vivo murine model. Endometriosis was induced surgically in female C57BL/6 mice. E4 was delivered via Alzet pump (3 mg/kg/day) from the 15th postoperative day for 4 weeks. E4 significantly reduced the volume (p < 0.001) and weight (p < 0.05) of ectopic lesions. Histologically, E4 did not affect cell proliferation (PCNA immunohistochemistry) but it did increase cell apoptosis (TUNEL assay) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, it modulated oxidative stress (SOD, CAT, and GPX activity, p < 0.05) and increased lipid peroxidation (TBARS/MDA, p < 0.01). Molecular analysis showed mRNA (RT-qPCR) and protein (ELISA) expression of TNF-α decreased (p < 0.05) and mRNA expression of Esr2 reduced (p < 0.05), in contrast with the increased expression of Esr1 (p < 0.01) and Pgr (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates for the first time that E4 limited the development and progression of endometriosis in vivo.

The role of progestin subdermal implant in the management of adenomyosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The long-acting reversible contraception progestin subdermal implant (ENG implant) may be effective to improve endometriosis-related symptoms. Since adenomyosis is a histopathological form of endometriosis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ENG implant in adenomyosis management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic search in Medline, Scopus, Embase databases and Google Scholar using combinations of the following keywords: Progestin; subdermal implant; Implanon; Nexplanon; Adenomyosis; Endometriosis.

RESULTS

Out of 889 articles in the initial database, 5 prospective observational studies were eligible for inclusion in our literature review. Our review involving 152 participants found a significant reduction in pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea (baseline median VAS score ranged from 10 to 7.62 before implantation vs VAS score ranged from 1.81 to 0.1 after implantation) as well as an increase in the levels of haemoglobin after implantation of the device (from 86 g/L to 129 g/L after implantation). Moreover, the improvement may be sustained throughout the long-term follow-up visits (until 36 months). The most common adverse events were changes in bleeding patterns which were tolerable in most cases.

CONCLUSION

ENG implant may be a relevant and promising medical option in the management of adenomyosis. Nevertheless, randomised controlled trials and prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm the potential role of ENG implant in the management of adenomyosis.

Health benefits of combined oral contraceptives - a narrative review

PURPOSE

This review presents an update of the non-contraceptive health benefits of the combined oral contraceptive pill.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search for (review) articles that discussed the health benefits of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), in the period from 1980 to 2023.

RESULTS

We identified 21 subjective and/or objective health benefits of COCs related to (i) the reproductive tract, (ii) non-gynaecological benign disorders and (iii) malignancies. Reproductive tract benefits are related to menstrual bleeding(including anaemia and toxic shock syndrome), dysmenorrhoea, migraine, premenstrual syndrome (PMS), ovarian cysts, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), androgen related symptoms, ectopic pregnancy, hypoestrogenism, endometriosis and adenomyosis, uterine fibroids and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Non-gynaecological benefits are related to benign breast disease, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma and porphyria. Health benefits of COCs related to cancer are lower risks of endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of combined oral contraceptives is accompanied with a range of health benefits, to be balanced against its side-effects and risks. Several health benefits of COCs are a reason for non-contraceptive COC prescription.

Towards comprehensive management of symptomatic endometriosis: beyond the dichotomy of medical versus surgical treatment

Except when surgery is the only option because of organ damage, the presence of suspicious lesions, or the desire to conceive, women with endometriosis-associated pain often face a choice between medical and surgical treatment. In theory, the description of the potential benefits and potential harms of the two alternatives should be standardized, unbiased, and based on strong evidence, enabling the patient to make an informed decision. However, doctor's opinion, intellectual competing interests, local availability of specific services and (mis)information obtained from social media, and online support groups can influence the type of advice given and affect patients' choices. This is compounded by the paucity of robust data from randomized controlled trials, and the anxiety of distressed women who are eager to do anything to alleviate their disabling symptoms. Vulnerable patients are more likely to accept the suggestions of their healthcare provider, which can lead to unbalanced and physician-centred decisions, whether in favour of either medical or surgical treatment. In general, treatments should be symptom-orientated rather than lesion-orientated. Medical and surgical modalities appear to be similarly effective in reducing pain symptoms, with medications generally more successful for severe dysmenorrhoea and surgery more successful for severe deep dyspareunia caused by fibrotic lesions infiltrating the posterior compartment. Oestrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogen monotherapies are generally safe and well tolerated, provided there are no major contraindications. About three-quarters of patients with superficial peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis and two-thirds of those with infiltrating fibrotic lesions are ultimately satisfied with their medical treatment although the remainder may experience side effects, which may result in non-compliance. Surgery for superficial and ovarian endometriosis is usually safe. When fibrotic infiltrating lesions are present, morbidity varies greatly depending on the skill of the individual surgeon, the need for advanced procedures, such as bowel resection and ureteral reimplantation, and the availability of expert colorectal surgeons and urologists working together in a multidisciplinary approach. The generalizability of published results is adequate for medical treatment but very limited for surgery. Moreover, on the one hand, hormonal drugs induce disease remission but do not cure endometriosis, and symptom relapse is expected when the drugs are discontinued; on the other hand, the same drugs should be used after lesion excision, which also does not cure endometriosis, to prevent an overall cumulative symptom and lesion recurrence rate of 10% per postoperative year. Therefore, the real choice may not be between medical treatment and surgery, but between medical treatment alone and surgery plus postoperative medical treatment. The experience of pain in women with endometriosis is a complex phenomenon that is not exclusively based on nociception, although the role of peripheral and central sensitization is not fully understood. In addition, trauma, and especially sexual trauma, and pelvic floor disorders can cause or contribute to symptoms in many individuals with chronic pelvic pain, and healthcare providers should never take for granted that diagnosed or suspected endometriosis is always the real, or the sole, origin of the referred complaints. Alternative treatment modalities are available that can help address most of the additional causes contributing to symptoms. Pain management in women with endometriosis may be more than a choice between medical and surgical treatment and may require comprehensive care by a multidisciplinary team including psychologists, sexologists, physiotherapists, dieticians, and pain therapists. An often missing factor in successful treatment is empathy on the part of healthcare providers. Being heard and understood, receiving simple and clear explanations and honest communication about uncertainties, being invited to share medical decisions after receiving detailed and impartial information, and being reassured that a team member will be available should a major problem arise, can greatly increase trust in doctors and transform a lonely and frustrating experience into a guided and supported journey, during which coping with this chronic disease is gradually learned and eventually accepted. Within this broader scenario, patient-centred medicine is the priority, and whether or when to resort to surgery or choose the medical option remains the prerogative of each individual woman.

Genistein Ameliorated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A (VEGF-A) and Estrogen Receptor-Alpha (ER-α) in Endometriosis Mice Model, In Vivo and In Silico

Endometriosis (EM) is a gynecological disorder that causes morbidity in women and is characterized by endometrial tissue in the uterus cavity. This study investigated the mechanism of genistein in the VEGF-A and ER-α expression through in vivo and in silico approaches. An in vivo study was conducted by thirty-six mice that were divided into six groups including control, EM, and EM treatment with genistein with the doses of 1.3, 1.95, 2.6, and 3.25 mg/day for 14 days. Peritoneal tissues with lesions were collected and analyzed by immunohistochemistry to measure the VEGF-A and ER-α expression. The data were analyzed using a statistical approach using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test with a significant value p < 0.05. In silico study was conducted for investigating the inhibition mechanism of genistein in VEGF-A and ER-α protein. Genistein significantly reduced the VEGF-A and ER-α expression with the optimum dose of 3.25 mg/day. Molecular docking showed that genistein inhibited VEGF-A in several active site residues of VEGF-A, also blocked the ER-α protein in estradiol binding sites. This study concluded that genistein prevented endometriosis by performing the antiangiogenic activity and showed a similar function to estradiol.

Distinct molecular targets of ProEGCG from EGCG and superior inhibition of angiogenesis signaling pathways for treatment of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common chronic gynecological disease with endometrial cell implantation outside the uterus. Angiogenesis is a major pathophysiology in endometriosis. Our previous studies have demonstrated that the prodrug of epigallocatechin gallate (ProEGCG) exhibits superior anti-endometriotic and anti-angiogenic effects compared to epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). However, their direct binding targets and underlying mechanisms for the differential effects remain unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that oral ProEGCG can be effective in preventing and treating endometriosis. Additionally, 1D and 2D Proteome Integral Solubility Alteration assay-based chemical proteomics identified metadherin (MTDH) and PX domain containing serine/threonine kinase-like (PXK) as novel binding targets of EGCG and ProEGCG, respectively. Computational simulation and BioLayer interferometry were used to confirm their binding affinity. Our results showed that MTDH-EGCG inhibited protein kinase B (Akt)-mediated angiogenesis, while PXK-ProEGCG inhibited epidermal growth factor (EGF)-mediated angiogenesis via the EGF/hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1a)/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. In vitro and in vivo knockdown assays and microvascular network imaging further confirmed the involvement of these signaling pathways. Moreover, our study demonstrated that ProEGCG has superior therapeutic effects than EGCG by targeting distinct signal transduction pathways and may act as a novel antiangiogenic therapy for endometriosis.

Comprehensive endometriosis care: a modern multimodal approach for the treatment of pelvic pain and endometriosis

Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological disease, leading to chronic pain and inflammation, affecting 1 in 10 individuals presumed female at birth. The diagnostic journey is often arduous, marked by neglect of the right diagnosis and prolonged wait times, significantly compromising the quality of life among those affected. This review provides a nuanced exploration of endometriosis-associated pain management, encompassing medical, surgical, and holistic approaches, all guided by accurate and refined diagnostics. Our paramount goal is to empower physicians as key figures in confronting this intricate challenge with a patient-centric approach, ultimately aiming to improve treatment and quality of life. Acknowledging each patient's unique needs, we emphasize the importance of tailoring a spectrum of options informed by current literature and insights gleaned from our experience in a high-volume tertiary endometriosis center. It is imperative to recognize endometriosis as a complex and chronic disease, often occurring with co-morbid conditions and nuanced complexities, necessitating a long-term personalized multimodal approach for each case. In addition, incorporating principles such as patient autonomy, profound respect for diverse experiences, and practical education on treatment choices is pivotal in enhancing treatment outcomes and overall patient satisfaction.

Does Sexual Function and Quality of Life Improve after Medical Therapy in Women with Endometriosis? A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a gynecological condition affecting up to 10% of women of reproductive age and characterized by chronic pain. Pain is the major cause of the impairment of quality of life in all aspects of these patients. Previous studies have shown that endometriosis treatment, hormonal or surgical, has proven effective not only in controlling the disease but also in improving symptoms, and we can assume also effective in improving quality of life.

METHODS

This study evaluates quality of life and sexual function in patients with endometriosis at the time of diagnosis and after 6 months of medical therapy, to assess the impact of treatment on these aspects. We evaluated retrospectively patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis between 2018 and 2020. All patients underwent gynecological examination and transvaginal ultrasound and filled in three questionnaires. The same evaluation was provided after taking medical hormonal therapy.

RESULTS

The improvement of dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia after medical treatment were statistically significant. Instead, items concerning arousal, lubrication, and sexual satisfaction showed a statistically significant worsening after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We can state that hormone therapy alone is not sufficient to achieve an improvement in the patient's quality of life and sexual function. Emerging evidence suggests that most of these patients showed a central sensibilization phenomenon characterized by an amplification of the response to a peripheral and/or neuropathic nociceptive trigger, which is expressed by hyperalgesia and allodynia. For this reason, in these patients, it is better to adopt a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach, including other professional figures, that acts on pain and also intervenes in all those conditions that contribute to worsening quality of life.

The temporal effect of emotional distress on psychological and physical functioning in endometriosis: A 12-month prospective study

Psychological factors of emotional distress and cognition have an important role in the understanding and management of endometriosis; however, their temporal relationship with key pain variables is not fully understood. This exploratory study sought to establish the temporal relationship between psychological and pain-related factors in a 12-month prospective study of 208 Australian women with endometriosis. Participants, aged 18-50 years and living in Australia, were recruited via social media and completed baseline (May 2019) and 12-month follow-up (June 2020) surveys. Participants who reported a diagnosis of endometriosis and menses in the past 12 months were included in the study. Structural equation modelling was used to determine the temporal effects of psychological and pain-related factors in endometriosis. In a covariate-adjusted model, baseline emotional distress was the only variable to predict pain catastrophizing (β = .24, p < .01), functional pain disability (β = .16, p < .05) and concomitant emotional distress (β = .55, p < .001) 12 months later, adjusting for age and chronic illness. Women who exhibit symptoms of distress may be at risk of poorer psychological and physical function at 12 months. Further research is required to understand the impact of psychological management early in the disease course.

Exploring Patient Adherence to Post-Surgical Follow-Up in Pelvic Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a significant cause of disability that affects 5-10% of reproductive-aged women. Laparoscopy with histological confirmation is the gold standard in establishing the diagnosis as therapeutic management surgery is addressed to a certain category of patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient adherence to follow-up after surgery for endometriosis as the primary endpoint, pain symptoms, quality of life, mental health, and fertility as the secondary endpoints. We have analyzed patients' adherence to follow-up after surgery for endometriosis after 1, 3, 5, and 7 years. Out of the 2538 total number of surgeries, 453 patients replied just to the first questionnaire (group A), 528 to the first and second (group B), and only 356 carried out the entire follow-up schedule. General health was significantly lower for group A (46.6 vs. 56.4) but with no statistical difference in the post-surgical improvement in both groups. Pain level score improvement was lower for group A (10.5 vs. 18.8), which is statistically significant. In this light, laparoscopy still remains the gold standard in diagnosis only. Furthermore, no malignancy was discovered. The mental component was improved by laparoscopy based on SF-36 in group B. Studies on patient preference for surgery versus alternative treatment are needed.

Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic anastomosis for old traumatic disjunction between the cervix and the uterine corpus: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Old traumatic disjunction between the cervix and the uterine corpus is very rare case. In most cases, it is not immediately noticed until the onset of other symptoms, such as amenorrhea, periodic abdominal pain and so on. Scanty cases of anastomosis surgery via laparoscope have been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report here a 23-year-old young woman with the primary amenorrhea due to traumatic cervico-isthmic disjunction. The patient had a closed pelvic fracture at the age of 4 and has experienced periodic lower abdominal pain since the age of 17 years. A complete disjunction between the cervix and the uterine corpus was diagnosed. Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic anastomosis was performed to restore the continuity of the endometrial cavity and cervical canal. After this surgery, normal menstruation was resumed without cyclic abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic anastomosis could reconstruct the uterine outflow tract successfully, alleviate symptoms, and achieve a good short-term outcome.

How to Improve Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis with Advanced Statistical Methods

Background and Objectives: Endometriosis is one of the most common gynecological disorders in women of reproductive age. Causing pelvic pain and infertility, it is considered one of the most serious health problems, being responsible for work absences or productivity loss. Its diagnosis is often delayed because of the need for an invasive laparoscopic approach. Despite years of studies, no single marker for endometriosis has been discovered. The aim of this research was to find an algorithm based on symptoms and laboratory tests that could diagnose endometriosis in a non-invasive way. Materials and Methods: The research group consisted of 101 women hospitalized for diagnostic laparoscopy, among which 71 had confirmed endometriosis. Data on reproductive history were collected in detail. CA125 (cancer antigen-125) level and VEGF1(vascular endothelial growth factor 1) were tested in blood samples. Among the used statistical methods, the LASSO regression-a new important statistical tool eliminating the least useful features-was the only method to have significant results. Results: Out of 19 features based on results of LASSO, 7 variables were chosen: body mass index, age of menarche, cycle length, painful periods, information about using contraception, CA125, and VEGF1. After multivariate logistic regression with a backward strategy, the three most significant features were evaluated. The strongest impact on endometriosis prediction had information about painful periods, CA125 over 15 u/mL, and the lowest BMI, with a sensitivity of 0.8800 and a specificity of 0.8000, respectively. Conclusions: Advanced statistical methods are crucial when creating non-invasive tests for endometriosis. An algorithm based on three easy features, including painful menses, BMI level, and CA125 concentration could have an important place in the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. If confirmed in a prospective study, implementing such an algorithm in populations with a high risk of endometriosis will allow us to cover patients suspected of endometriosis with proper treatment.

Assessment of quality of life and psychological repercussions in women with endometriosis according to pain intensity

The objective is to evaluate quality of life, anxiety, and depression in women with endometriosis, and to correlate these parameters with pain intensity. This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on 102 women with endometriosis from 2017 to 2020. The women were divided into two groups according to the pain intensity: group 1 (severe pain, 62 women) and group 2 (mild/moderate pain, 40 women). The Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory were used to assess quality of life and levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. In both groups, mean age and mean body mass index were similar (p˃ 0.5). Most women had deep endometriosis and were on treatment, but group 2 had a longer treatment time (p = 0.044). Group 1 exhibited more depression and anxiety than group 2 (17.1 ± 9.98 vs. 11.15 ± 9.25, p = 0.003 and 23.71 ± 12.92 vs 12.58 ± 10.53, p = 0.001, respectively). Women with high pain had a significantly worse quality of life than those with low pain (48.88 ± 16.02 vs. 23.32 ± 15.93, p < 0.001). Women with endometriosis and high pain intensity have a worse quality of life, and more severe levels of anxiety and depression.

Efficacy of long-term pituitary down-regulation pretreatment prior to in vitro fertilization in infertile patients with endometriosis: A meta-analysis

Controversial conclusions have been made in previous studies regarding the influence of ultra-long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in the reproductive outcomes of women with endometriosis who are undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). An electronic search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect and Medline from inception until 10 September 2022. Only randomized studies were included. After the selection process, seven articles were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The pooling of the results showed the adverse effect of ultra-long protocol in terms of live birth rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.53, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.31-0.9, P=0.02) and fertilization rate (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36, P=0.02). There was no statistical significance between the ultra-long protocol and long protocol of the rest outcome Indicators. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that ultra-long GnRH-a does not appear to improve the results of IVF/ICSI treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis.

"Better late than never but never late is better", especially in young women. A multicenter Italian study on diagnostic delay for symptomatic endometriosis

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the length of diagnostic delay of symptomatic endometriosis in Italy and analyse the presence of correlations between the socio-demographic status of patients and the clinical characteristics/type of diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in 10 tertiary Italian referral centres for diagnosis and treatment endometriosis. A total of 689 respondents with histologically proven endometriosis and onset of the disease with pain symptoms completed an on-line self-reported questionnaire written in their own language (World Endometriosis Research Foundation-Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project-Endometriosis Patient Questionnaire-Minimum) evaluating endometriosis related symptoms, family history of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain, demographic data, as well as medical, reproductive, and obstetric history.

RESULTS

The mean diagnostic delay found was of 11.4 years. The mean time (14.8 years) from symptoms onset to diagnosis was significantly longer among patients aged 9-19 vs patients aged 20-30 (mean 6.9 years, p < 0.001) and patients aged 31-45 (mean 2.9, p < 0.001). No significant association were found between a delayed diagnosis and any of the clinically relevant factors such as the number or severity of the reported symptoms, familiarity, hormonal therapy intake or methodology of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean diagnostic delay of endometriosis in Italy is about 11 years. The delay can be up to 4 years longer in patients with pain symptoms onset under 20 years. Educating clinicians and patients on pathologic nature of endometriosis related pelvic pain is advisable to reduce waiting time to diagnosis, especially for young women.

EFFECTIVENESS OF HORMONAL MONOTHERAPY BEFORE SURGICAL TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH EXTERNAL GENITAL ENDOMETRIOSIS

OBJECTIVE

The aim: Evaluation of the effectiveness of hormone therapy before and after surgical treatment in patients with external genital endometriosis (HRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Bibliographic, information-analytical, clinical-instrumental, laboratory, histomorphological methods were used in the work. The sources of information were data from the scientific literature on the topic of the study, modern guidelines, a review of randomized controlled studies.

RESULTS

Results: All women involved in the study received hormone therapy before and after surgery for 3-6-9 months: 45.0% - only COCs, 25.0% - courses of a-GnRH drugs; 30.0% - only progestogens. Comparative evaluation of the function of the relapse-free course of UHD using the Kaplan-Meier method showed that when using a-GnRH in patients with UHD, the duration of the relapse-free period is higher than for other groups of drugs: the indicator of the function of maintaining remission before surgical treatment decreases from 100% to 0% during the first 6 months in 89.0%, and during 9 months - in 66.0% of patients. Progression of the disease, after surgery and withdrawal of a-GnRH, with a 3-month course occurred - after 3 months - in 45.0%, with a 6-month course - after 9 months - in 33.0%, with a 9-month course - after 12 months - in 12.0% of people. Thus, the average median of the recurrence-free course was ±11.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The most effective hormone therapy in patients with HRT before and after surgical treatment is therapy with drugs of the α-¬HnRH group, courses of at least 6 months.

Estro-Progestins and Pain Relief in Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a benign, hormone-responsive chronic disease that affects women of reproductive age; long-term treatment to balance satisfactory tolerability with clinical efficacy is necessary for these patients. The first-line therapy for endometriosis is predominantly medical treatment, in order to improve symptoms or prevent post-surgical disease recurrence. Multiple factors including age and women preference, pain severity, and endometriosis stage must be considered in the choice of the most suitable therapy. Estrogen-progestogins are generally used as first-line hormone therapies among different medical options currently effective for endometriosis management. Several studies have shown that they are able to improve pain symptoms in most patients, are well tolerated, and are inexpensive. Combined hormonal contraception treatment, administered cyclically or continuously, with different types of hormones and route of administration, results in clinically noticeable decrease in dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and recurrence rate after surgery, and also in quality of life improvement.

Pain Management in Endometriosis

Collapse

Long-term treatment of endometriosis-related pain among women seeking hormonal contraception

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the different effects of a progestin-only contraceptive with desogestrel (DSG) vs combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for a first line long-term treatment of endometriosis-related pain among patients seeking hormonal contraception.

METHODS

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with a local outpatient clinic for endometriosis among a group of nulliparous young women (n = 216) with endometriosis-related pain and seeking contraception. The cohort was subdivided into a group (n = 73) treated as first line by DSG and another group (n = 75) treated by a COC. During the study, clinical symptoms, side effects and possible changes in OC type use were recorded.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of clinical characteristics and pain scores before treatment. After 6 months both treatments were effective in reducing endometriosis-related pain, and those treated with DSG showed lower levels of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and nonmenstrual pelvic pain than COCs group (p < .01). After 12 months, in DSG Group some patients (15%) switched from DSG to a COC for breakthrough bleeding, whereas in COC Group 48% of patients switched to another type of COC for reduced efficacy on pain and/or for side effects. After 3 years of OC treatment, in DSG Group 79% of patients maintained the same therapy, whereas in COC Group only 14% continued the same COC type, 37% switched to another COC and 47% to DSG.

CONCLUSIONS

A progestin-only contraceptive with DSG is a valid option for long term management of endometriosis-related pain in patients seeking hormonal contraception.

The use of progestin subdermal implants in the management of endometriosis-related pain symptoms and quality of life: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for the use of progestin subdermal implants for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain symptoms and quality of life.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE and EMBASE), and Web of Science was performed from inception to December 2020. In addition, a targeted search of cited references was also performed. Our search identified 330 articles of which 17 were deemed eligible for full-text review. Eligible studies included randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series with at least 5 cases, investigating the effect of progestin subdermal implants on endometriosis-related pain scores in women of reproductive age with a clinical, radiologic, or surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Six articles were excluded after the full-text screen.

RESULTS

Eleven articles describing a total of 335 patients were eligible for inclusion. Across all studies, etonogestrel- and segesterone-releasing progestin subdermal implants improved VAS pain scores for cyclic pelvic pain/dysmenorrhea (VAS at baseline ranged from 6.1 to 7.5 cm and after treatment from 1.7 to 4.9 cm, n = 121), non-cyclic pelvic pain (baseline VAS 7.2-7.6 cm and after treatment 2.0-3.7 cm, n = 96) and dyspareunia (baseline VAS 1.61-8.3 cm and after treatment 1.0-7.1 cm, n = 87). Symptom improvement with the progestin subdermal implant was equivalent to treatment with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; average baseline VAS 6.5 and after DMPA treatment 3.0, compared to 2.0 after treatment with the implant) or the 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; baseline cyclic and non-cyclic pain scores 7.3 and 7.4 respectively decreased to 1.9 and 1.9 after LNG-IUS treatment). Improvements were also demonstrated in quality-of-life scores (average improvement of 36% in all domains of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 and significant improvements in social functioning, general health, bodily pain, vitality and mental health domains on the Short Form-36 questionnaire) and sexual function (total sexual function score improved from 24 to 25.35 and 26.25 at 6 and 12 months).

CONCLUSION

Etonogestrel- and segesterone-releasing progestin subdermal implants appear to improve endometriosis-related pain symptoms and quality of life and may provide an additional component in the management of endometriosis. However, this systematic review is limited by the small sample size and heterogeneity in the data. As such, larger prospective randomized trials are needed to guide further management.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021225665.

ESHRE guideline: endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

How should endometriosis be diagnosed and managed based on the best available evidence from published literature?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The current guideline provides 109 recommendations on diagnosis, treatments for pain and infertility, management of disease recurrence, asymptomatic or extrapelvic disease, endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women, prevention and the association with cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis is a chronic condition with a plethora of presentations in terms of not only the occurrence of lesions, but also the presence of signs and symptoms. The most important symptoms include pain and infertility.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 1 December 2020 and written in English were included in the literature review.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed within specialist subgroups and then presented to the core guideline development group (GDG) until consensus was reached. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the GDG and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This guideline aims to help clinicians to apply best care for women with endometriosis. Although studies mostly focus on women of reproductive age, the guideline also addresses endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women. The guideline outlines the diagnostic process for endometriosis, which challenges laparoscopy and histology as gold standard diagnostic tests. The options for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain symptoms include analgesics, medical treatments and surgery. Non-pharmacological treatments are also discussed. For management of endometriosis-associated infertility, surgical treatment and/or medically assisted reproduction are feasible. While most of the more recent studies confirm previous ESHRE recommendations, there are five topics in which significant changes to recommendations were required and changes in clinical practice are to be expected.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The guideline describes different management options but, based on existing evidence, no firm recommendations could be formulated on the most appropriate treatments. Also, for specific clinical issues, such as asymptomatic endometriosis or extrapelvic endometriosis, the evidence is too scarce to make evidence-based recommendations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in endometriosis care, based on the best evidence currently available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payments. C.M.B. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare and the European Commission; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with ObsEva (Data Safety Monitoring Group) and Myovant (Scientific Advisory Group). A.B. reports grants from FEMaLE executive board member and European Commission Horizon 2020 grant; consulting fees from Ethicon Endo Surgery, Medtronic; honoraria for lectures from Ethicon; and support for meeting attendance from Gedeon Richter; A.H. reports grants from MRC, NIHR, CSO, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring; Consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Nordic Pharma, Chugai and Benevolent Al Bio Limited all paid to the institution; a pending patent on Serum endometriosis biomarker; he is also Chair of TSC for STOP-OHSS and CERM trials. O.H. reports consulting fees and speaker's fees from Gedeon Richter and Bayer AG; support for attending meetings from Gedeon-Richter, and leadership roles at the Finnish Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Nordic federation of the societies of obstetrics and gynecology. L.K. reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; support for attending meetings from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; he also has a leadership role in the German Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (DGGEF). M.K. reports grants from French Foundation for Medical Research (FRM), Australian Ministry of Health, Medical Research Future Fund and French National Cancer Institute; support for meeting attendance from European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), European Congress on Endometriosis (EEC) and ESHRE; She is an advisory Board Member, FEMaLe Project (Finding Endometriosis Using Machine Learning), Scientific Committee Chair for the French Foundation for Research on Endometriosis and Scientific Committee Chair for the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. A.N. reports grants from Merck SA and Ferring; speaker fees from Merck SA and Ferring; support for meeting attendance from Merck SA; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; she also is a board member of medical advisory board, Endometriosis Society, the Netherlands (patients advocacy group) and an executive board member of the World Endometriosis Society. E.S. reports grants from National Institute for Health Research UK, Rosetrees Trust, Barts and the London Charity; Royalties from De Gruyter (book editor); consulting fees from Hologic; speakers fees from Hologic, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Intuitive, Olympus and Karl Storz; Participation in the Medicines for Women's Health Expert Advisory Group with Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); he is also Ambassador for the World Endometriosis Society. C.T. reports grants from Merck SA; Consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; speaker fees from Merck SA, all paid to the institution; and support for meeting attendance from Ferring, Gedeon Richter and Merck SA. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.).

Perimenstrual Asthma in Adolescents: A Shared Condition in Pediatric and Gynecological Endocrinology

Asthma is a frequent medical condition in adolescence. The worsening of the most common symptoms perimenstrually is defined as perimenstrual asthma (PMA). The cause of PMA remains unclear, but a role for hormonal milieu is plausible. Data on PMA in adolescents are limited, and its management is not fully established. We aimed to discuss the PMA phenomenon in young females from pathophysiology to preventive strategies, focusing on the relationship with the hormonal pattern. The fluctuation of estrogens at ovulation and before menstruation and the progesterone secretion during the luteal phase and its subsequent withdrawal seem to be the culprits, because the deterioration of asthma is cyclical during the luteal phase and/or during the first days of the menstrual cycle. Conventional asthma therapies are not always effective for PMA. Preventive strategies may include innovative hormonal contraception. Even a possible beneficial effect of other hormonal treatments, including estrogens, progestogens, and androgens, as well as leukotriene receptor antagonists and explorative approach using microbial-directed therapy, is considered. The underlying mechanisms, through which sex-hormone fluctuations influence asthma symptoms, represent a challenge in the clinical management of such a distressing condition. Further studies focused on young females are mandatory to promote adolescent health.

Changes in Utilization of Birth Control and PrEP During COVID-19 in the USA: A Mixed-Method Analysis

In the USA, the COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges beyond the direct consequences of the infection. Because of shifting resources in response to need, many domains within the healthcare sector unrelated to COVID-19 have had interrupted abilities to provide care. In the current study, we focus on preventative sexual health care during the pandemic. In a sample of 511 (mean age = 27.7) people, we examined quantitative data regarding continuation and discontinuation of birth control and PrEP during the pandemic, along with qualitative data illustrating the underlying reasons for participants' (dis)continuation. Results showed that most (92.5%) of birth control users reported continuation of their birth control, with the predominant reasons reported being use for health reasons, long-acting reversible contraceptive use, access to remote healthcare services, and increased vigilance over pregnancy prevention. Conversely, around half (52.6%) of PrEP-using participants reported already discontinuing or planning to discontinue their PrEP regimen. Temporary abstinence and concerns about accessing in-person health care were the predominant reasons for PrEP discontinuation. These results have implications for both researchers and sexual healthcare providers. Disruptions to preventative sexual health care should be considered in ongoing research about patient needs, and healthcare providers may wish to consider particular challenges faced by PrEP users concerning re-start and continuation.

Bioinformatics Analysis Identifies Molecular Markers Regulating Development and Progression of Endometriosis and Potential Therapeutic Drugs

Endometriosis, a common disease that presents as polymorphism, invasiveness, and extensiveness, with clinical manifestations including dysmenorrhea, infertility, and menstrual abnormalities, seriously affects quality of life in women. To date, its underlying etiological mechanism of action and the associated regulatory genes remain unclear. This study aimed to identify molecular markers and elucidate mechanisms underlying the development and progression of endometriosis. Specifically, we downloaded five microarray expression datasets, namely, GSE11691, GSE23339, GSE25628, GSE7305, and GSE105764, from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. These datasets, obtained from endometriosis tissues, alongside normal controls, were subjected to in-depth bioinformatics analysis for identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), followed by analysis of their function and pathways via gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. Moreover, we constructed a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network to explore the hub genes and modules, and then applied machine learning algorithms support vector machine-recursive feature elimination and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis to identify key genes. Furthermore, we adopted the CIBERSORTx algorithm to estimate levels of immune cell infiltration while the connective map (CMAP) database was used to identify potential therapeutic drugs in endometriosis. As a result, a total of 423 DEGs, namely, 233 and 190 upregulated and downregulated, were identified. On the other hand, a total of 1,733 PPIs were obtained from the PPI network. The DEGs were mainly enriched in immune-related mechanisms. Furthermore, machine learning and LASSO algorithms identified three key genes, namely, apelin receptor (APLNR), C–C motif chemokine ligand 21 (CCL21), and Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIa (FCGR2A). Furthermore, 16 small molecular compounds associated with endometriosis treatment were identified, and their mechanism of action was also revealed. Taken together, the findings of this study provide new insights into the molecular factors regulating occurrence and progression of endometriosis and its underlying mechanism of action. The identified therapeutic drugs and molecular markers may have clinical significance in early diagnosis of endometriosis.

Treatment use and satisfaction in Australian women with endometriosis: A mixed-methods study

AIMS

This study aimed to document the frequency of conventional and complementary treatments used by Australian women with endometriosis and the perceived efficacy of these treatments; and to qualitatively explore women's treatment satisfaction.

METHODS

Using a mixed-methods design, 532 women with self-reported endometriosis were recruited from the community.

METHOD

Participants were asked about their medication, complementary and self-care treatment use, as well as perceived efficacy on a 0 (not effective) - 10 (extremely effective) numeric rating scale (NRS), and open-ended qualitative survey items about treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

97% of women used medication for pain relief (mean perceived efficacy = 5.05) and 89% used complementary/ self-care strategies (mean perceived efficacy = 3.70), with medication rated as significantly more effective (p <.001). Content analysis of the qualitative data identified that 36% of women were dissatisfied with treatment, 34% were somewhat satisfied, and 24% were satisfied. We identified qualitative themes relating to: 1) Barriers to treatment, which included lack of access, stigma, and disappointment with medical professionals who were perceived as uncaring, unhelpful and in some cases, psychologically damaging; 2) The need for holistic, interdisciplinary care; and 3) Patient knowledge, advocacy and resilience in endometriosis management.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal important limitations in the current Australian healthcare model, including the need for patient-centred interdisciplinary care that treats the biopsychosocial needs of people with endometriosis; and widespread pain education, spanning medical training to community awareness. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A clinical observational study on the efficacy of subcutaneous etonogestrel implants for adenomyosis in 20 patients

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous etonogestrel implants for adenomyosis.Methods: We conducted a clinical observational study of 20 patients suffering from adenomyosis treated with subcutaneous etonogestrel implants from August 2015 to July 2017 and followed up for 36 months. We evaluated the efficacy of subcutaneous etonogestrel implants primarily based on the following indicators: the pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) for menstrual blood volume, changes in bleeding patterns, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score for dysmenorrhea, uterine volume, serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels, hemoglobin levels and side effects.Results: During the 3 years of follow-up, subcutaneous etonogestrel implants were removed from six patients, among whom one was diagnosed with endometrial cancer, four had an increased menstrual blood volume, and one entered menopause. In total, 14 patients were treated with subcutaneous etonogestrel implants for 3 years. Among these patients, the number of patients with heavy menstrual bleeding and high PBAC and VAS scores and serum CA125 levels was significantly decreased after implantation compared with that before implantation. In the eight patients with anemia, hemoglobin levels increased gradually. However, the uterine volumes did not significantly change. Bleeding patterns were changed but were tolerable.Conclusion: Subcutaneous etonogestrel implants represent a new option for the clinical treatment of adenomyosis for patients who refuse surgery.

Medical management of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic disorder that is defined as functional endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity. It is an estrogen-dependent, inflammatory disease that leads to symptoms of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility, occurring in 6-10% of reproductive aged women. The severity of the disease ranges from asymptomatic to debilitating symptoms that have a major impact on women's lives. It is a chronic, recurrent disease, frequently requiring long term management until menopause and beyond. It is considered a chronic disorder that is managed with surgery, medical treatment, and oftentimes, both. Current medical therapy for endometriosis is considered suppressive of the disease, rather than curative. Fortunately, many patients do experience improvement and control of their symptoms with medical therapy. However, long-term efficacy of the medical treatments is often limited by side effects and the cost of therapy, and symptoms do tend to recur after discontinuation of these medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis and provides more in-depth discussion of specific medical management options used to treat endometriosis, including mechanism of action and side effects. It also provides recommendations on strategy with a forward look to novel endometriosis treatments in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors emphasize that endometriosis is a chronic disorder requiring long term medical therapy. Early diagnosis of endometriosis is key in preventing severe, debilitating symptoms and progression of disease. By utilizing our current knowledge of the pathophysiology of endometriosis and by correctly implementing currently available medical and surgical therapies we can significantly reduce the physical, psychosocial and financial burden of this chronic, recurrent and indolent disease. Current available medications are suppressive therapies, but the authors are looking forward to future therapies that can effectively cure or at least control endometriosis with minimal side effects. Future research should continue to look for the genetic trigger for endometriosis which can lead us to its underlying pathogenesis and eventually a cure or prevention.

Pharmaceuticals targeting signaling pathways of endometriosis as potential new medical treatment: A review

Endometriosis (EM) is defined as endometrial tissues found outside the uterus. Growth and development of endometriotic cells in ectopic sites can be promoted via multiple pathways, including MAPK/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, NF-κB, Rho/ROCK, reactive oxidative stress, tumor necrosis factor, transforming growth factor-β, Wnt/β-catenin, vascular endothelial growth factor, estrogen, and cytokines. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms include proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, migration, invasion, fibrosis, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune escape. Current medical treatments for EM are mainly hormonal and symptomatic, and thus the development of new, effective, and safe pharmaceuticals targeting specific molecular and signaling pathways is needed. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature focused on pharmaceuticals that specifically target the molecular and signaling pathways involved in the pathophysiology of EM. Potential drug targets, their upstream and downstream molecules with key aberrant signaling, and the regulatory mechanisms promoting the growth and development of endometriotic cells and tissues were discussed. Hormonal pharmaceuticals, including melatonin, exerts proapoptotic via regulating matrix metallopeptidase activity while nonhormonal pharmaceutical sorafenib exerts antiproliferative effect via MAPK/ERK pathway and antiangiogenesis activity via VEGF/VEGFR pathway. N-acetyl cysteine, curcumin, and ginsenoside exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects via radical scavenging activity. Natural products have high efficacy with minimal side effects; for example, resveratrol and epigallocatechin gallate have multiple targets and provide synergistic efficacy to resolve the complexity of the pathophysiology of EM, showing promising efficacy in treating EM. Although new medical treatments are currently being developed, more detailed pharmacological studies and large sample size clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatments in the near future.

Risk factors for ovarian endometrioma recurrence following surgical excision: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

PURPOSE

Exploring potential risk factors for OMA recurrence, thereby contributing to the individual management of the disease and improving the patients' prognosis.

METHODS

Data sources PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang data were searched systematically before October 2020. We computed the pooled odd ratios or the standard mean difference with their corresponding 95% confidence interval to investigate the impact of involved risk factors on endometrioma recurrence.

RESULTS

The pooled findings of this meta-analysis demonstrated that endometrioma relapse was closely related to age at surgery [SMD (95% CI):  - 0.28 (- - 0.38 to  - 0.17), P < 0.00001], CA125 level [SMD (95% CI): 0.51 (0.14-0.88), P = 0.007], cyst size [SMD (95% CI): 0.35 (0.08-0.62), P = 0.01], dysmenorrhea [OR (95% CI): 1.47 (1.07-2.02), P = 0.02], endometriosis-related surgery history [OR (95% CI): 2.60 (1.84-3.67), P < 0.00001], pre-operative medication [OR (95% CI): 2.13 (1.41-3.22), P = 0.0003], rASRM score [SMD (95% CI): 0.33 (0.20-0.46), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, post-operative pregnancy was indicated a protective factor for preventing the OMA recurrence after surgery [OR (95% CI): 0.22 (0.09-0.56), P = 0.001] CONCLUSION: Age at surgery, CA125 level, cyst size, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis-related surgery history, pre-operative medication, rASRM score were risk factors for endometrioma relapse. In addition, post-operative pregnancy was a protective factor for preventing recurrence after surgery. However, the effect of bilateral involvement, combination with adenomyosis, or post-operative medication on endometrioma relapse need further investigations.

Reproductive issues in women on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are replacing warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists for a wide range of indications. Advantages of DOAC therapy are fewer food and drug interactions and fixed dosing without routine laboratory monitoring, making DOACs the perfect choice especially for younger patients, in whom the main indication for anticoagulation is prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although DOACs are safer and much more convenient than other anticoagulant alternatives, their profile may have drawbacks, especially for younger female patients in whom reproductive issues need special considerations. These may include the issue of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during anticoagulant therapy, the embryotoxicity risk from inadvertent DOAC exposure during pregnancy, and the prevention or planning of pregnancies during DOAC therapy. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence in this increasingly important field of women's health.