Exploring the potential value of improved care for secondary hyperparathyroidism with a novel calcimimetic therapy

Extracellular Calcium Receptor as a Target for Glutathione and Its Derivatives

Extracellular glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) can modulate the function of the extracellular calcium sensing receptor (CaSR). The CaSR has a binding pocket in the extracellular domain of CaSR large enough to bind either GSH or GSSG, as well as the naturally occurring oxidized derivative L-cysteine glutathione disulfide (CySSG) and the compound cysteinyl glutathione (CysGSH). Modeling the binding energies (ΔG) of CySSG and CysGSH to CaSR reveals that both cysteine derivatives may have greater affinities for CaSR than either GSH or GSSG. GSH, CySSG, and GSSG are found in circulation in mammals and, among the three, CySSG is more affected by HIV/AIDs and aging than either GSH or GSSG. The beta-carbon linkage of cysteine in CysGSH may model a new class of calcimimetics, exemplified by etelcalcetide. Circulating glutathionergic compounds, particularly CySSG, may mediate calcium-regulatory responses via receptor-binding to CaSR in a variety of organs, including parathyroids, kidneys, and bones. Receptor-mediated actions of glutathionergics may thus complement their roles in redox regulation and detoxification. The glutathionergic binding site(s) on CaSR are suggested to be a target for development of drugs that can be used in treating kidney and other diseases whose mechanisms involve CaSR dysregulation.

New Intravenous Calcimimetic Agents: New Options, New Problems. An Example on How Clinical, Economical and Ethical Considerations Affect Choice of Treatment

BACKGROUND

Dialysis treatment is improving, but several long-term problems remain unsolved, including metabolic bone disease linked to chronic kidney disease (CKD-MBD). The availability of new, efficacious but expensive drugs (intravenous calcimimetic agents) poses ethical problems, especially in the setting of budget limitations.

METHODS

Reasons of choice, side effects, biochemical trends were discussed in a cohort of 15 patients (13% of the dialysis population) who stared treatment with intravenous calcimimetics in a single center. All patients had previously been treated with oral calcimimetic agents; dialysis efficacy was at target in 14/15; hemodiafiltration was employed in 10/15. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 8. The indications were discussed according to the principlist ethics (beneficience, non maleficience, justice and autonomy). Biochemical results were analyzed to support the clinical-ethical choices.

RESULTS

In the context of a strict clinical and biochemical surveillance, the lack of side effects ensured "non-maleficence"; efficacy was at least similar to oral calcimimetic agents, but tolerance was better. Autonomy was respected through a shared decision-making model; all patients appreciated the reduction of the drug burden, and most acknowledged better control of their biochemical data. The ethical conflict resides in the balance between the clinical "beneficience, non-maleficience" advantage and "justice" (economic impact of treatment, potentially in attrition with other resources, since the drug is expensive and included in the dialysis bundle). The dilemma is more relevant when a patient's life expectancy is short (economic impact without clear clinical advantages), or when non-compliance is an issue (unclear advantage if the whole treatment is not correctly taken).

CONCLUSIONS

In a context of person-centered medicine, autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence should weight more than economic justice. While ethical discussions are not aimed at finding "the right answer" but asking "the right questions", this example can raise awareness of the importance of including an ethical analysis in the choice of "economically relevant" drugs.

Controversies in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease that begins early in the course of renal insufficiency as an adaptive response to maintain mineral homeostasis. This complex disorder affects the bone, leading to an increase in fracture risk and is associated with increased risks of vascular calcification and mortality. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we examine the different strategies available to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism. Particularly, we focus on the adequate control of serum phosphorus by restricting intake and the use of phosphate binders, correction of hypocalcemia while minimizing calcium burden, and reduction in PTH levels through the use of vitamin D sterols and calcimimetics. RECENT FINDINGS: It was observed that although numerous agents directed at the correction of these abnormalities have demonstrated effectiveness on biochemical markers, there is still a relative scarcity of studies demonstrating treatment effectiveness as measured by hard clinical outcomes. In addition, most agents have side effects that may limit their use, even in patients in which the treatment has demonstrated efficacy in controlling these parameters. There is still controversy as to what therapeutic regimens to choose for a particular patient and what parameter should be used to follow their effects, including outcomes, side effects, pill burden, and costs, among others. In the present article, we analyze controversial aspects of the different therapeutic agents available. Although many tools and regimens are available, no one by itself is enough for an adequate management of the patient. But rather, combined therapy and individualization of approaches are recommended for better results. We suggest that new studies analyzing the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches to the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism should be directed not only to controlling parathyroid hormone levels but also to the evaluation of long-term outcomes, based on modification of morbidity, mortality, and end organ impact, while reducing side effects and controlling costs, among others.