Evaluation of the alternative classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus established by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)

Evaluating performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 SLICC, and 1997 ACR criteria for classifying adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012, and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR 2019 SLE criteria are often used to classify patients with adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in clinical practice because there are currently no diagnostic criteria for SLE. However, there is scarce evidence regarding which criteria are best for diagnosing patients with adult-onset and childhood-onset SLE.

Methods

We searched Medline and Scopus databases for English-language articles from inception through October 2021. Data were extracted from the included publications by two independent reviewers. We performed bivariate meta-analysis with a random-effects model to pool diagnostic parameters. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity sources. We used network meta-analysis to compare diagnosis performance among the three criteria and ranked them in descending order. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plot.

Results

We included 29 studies for systematic review and meta-analysis. Of these, 18 studies involved adult-onset SLE and 11 studies involved childhood-onset SLE. The pooled sensitivities of the three criteria for diagnosis of adult-onset SLE were comparable between SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019 [95.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 92.28-97.81 vs. 94.79, 95% CI 92.03-96.63]; pooled specificity was highest in ACR 1997 (92.24, 95% CI 87.06-95.46). In childhood-onset SLE, pooled sensitivity was highest in SLICC 2012 (93.76, 95% CI 89.45-96.39), and pooled specificity was highest in ACR 1997 (95.89, 95% CI 91.73-98.00). In network meta-analysis, the pooled diagnostic odds ratio ranked highest for EULAR/ACR 2019 (131.570, 95% CI 61.50-281.47) in adult-onset SLE and ranked highest for SLICC 2012 (191.07, 95% CI 76.06-480.01) in childhood-onset SLE. Deeks' funnel plot showed no publication bias.

Conclusion

We found that the diagnostic performance of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria differed between adult-onset and childhood-onset SLE. EULAR/ACR 2019 performed best for adult-onset SLE and SLICC 2012 was best for childhood-onset SLE in classifying patients with SLE.

Systematic review registration

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [CRD420 21281586].

Etoricoxib Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in a case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a potentially life-threatening dermatological condition whose pathogenesis and exact treatment are not yet known. Drugs like anticonvulsants, allopurinol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like etoricoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor prescribed for pain management are associated with a high risk of toxic epidermal necrolysis. It is also associated with immunodeficiency and dysregulated immune reactions like systemic lupus erythematosus, an autoimmune disease in which organs and cells undergo damage initially mediated by tissue binding auto-antibodies and immune complexes. Here, a 34 year old lady was presented in emergency with multiple maculopapular rashes over the neck and trunk region after treatment with etoricoxib for osteoarthritis of the left foot.

Adult pure red cell aplasia at Universitas Academic Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa: A 9-year review

Background. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is characterised by severe normochromic, normocytic anaemia and partial or complete absence of reticulocytes from the peripheral blood. With bone marrow of normal cellularity, an almost complete absence of erythroblasts but preservation of other cell lines is observed. It may be congenital or acquired, with the latter presenting as a primary haematological disorder or secondary to various contributing factors. Management focuses on treatment of the underlying cause and supportive transfusions. Occasionally, immunosuppression or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is required.Objectives. To describe the clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of adult patients diagnosed with PRCA at Universitas Academic Hospital (UAH) in Bloemfontein, South Africa, from 2010 to 2018.Methods. A retrospective descriptive file review was performed. All adult patients diagnosed with PRCA and treated in the Division of Clinical Haematology at UAH during the study period were included. Variables recorded included demographic information, clinical details of the PRCA diagnosis, classification of the PRCA, HIV and parvovirus B19 test results, results of special investigations, medical and drug history, treatment and response to treatment.Results. Twenty-seven patients’ files were included, with a female predominance (n=22; 81.5%). The median age at diagnosis was 35 years (range 20 - 62). The median number of days from onset of symptoms to date of diagnosis was 61 days (range 27 - 114). Approximately half (n=13; 48.2%) of the patients presented with a haemoglobin concentration of 1 - 3 g/dL. Most patients (n=26; 96.3%) were infected with HIV, with 76.9% (n=20) having a suppressed viral load. Parvovirus B19 infection accounted for 44.4% of cases (n=12), and all these patients were HIV positive. Lamivudine was a probable cause of PRCA in 18.5% of cases, although the true causal relationship was uncertain. Corticosteroids and IVIG were first-line therapy in 44.4% (n=12) and 37.0% (n=10) of cases, respectively. Thirteen patients (48.2%) achieved a complete response and 7 (25.9%) a partial response, while 2 (7.4%) showed no response, with continued transfusion dependence.Conclusion. In this population, women were disproportionately affected by PRCA. HIV was the single most important cause of acquired PRCA, which was independent of virological control. Parvovirus B19 and drugs were also important causes of acquired PRCA and played a critical part in the evaluation and work-up of PRCA. Nearly half of the patients achieved a complete response to therapy, which was sustained over 24 months.

Diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Rheumatology-1997, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012, and the European League Against Rheumatism-2019 criteria for juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE/BACKGROUND

Several diagnostic criteria have been developed to effectively diagnose systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Three criteria are most common, namely the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-1997, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-2012, and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR/ACR)-2019. Whether they also apply to juvenile SLE is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the diagnostic accuracy of ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, and EULAR/ACR-2019 for juvenile SLE.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted up to 26 March 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

We included all study designs in which patients had any index tests for ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, or EULAR/ACR-2019; both full-text papers and conference abstracts published in English were used. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) case reports; (2) adult subjects; or (3) did not report sufficient information to acquire true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative values of diagnostic criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently screened studies, extracted relevant data, and assessed the risk of bias.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

First, a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of EULAR/ACR-2019 and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model was performed to estimate sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We then carried out a network meta-analysis to compare the performances of these three diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 17 relevant studies that included 2339 juvenile SLE patients were eligible to analyze pooled accuracy. In the meta-analysis, 10 studies (1613 cases) reported the diagnostic performance of EULAR/ACR-2019, showing a pooled sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95), pooled specificity of 0.89 (0.77-0.95), and area under HSROC of 0.96 (0.94-0.97). In the network meta-analysis, the SLICC-2012 (0.94, 0.92-0.96) had the highest sensitivity, followed by EULAR/ACR-2019 (0.93, 0.90-0.95), and ACR-1997 (0.78, 0.72-0.82); the ACR-1997 (0.96, 0.92-0.98) demonstrated the highest specificity. EULAR/ACR-2019 (0.92, 0.87-0.96) and SLICC-2012 (0.92, 0.86-0.96) had the similar specificity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

We found that the applicability of the new EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria in juvenile SLE is not yet the best diagnostic tool.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022321514.

A meta-analysis of clinical manifestations in asian systemic lupus erythematous: The effects of ancestry, ethnicity and gender

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Asians is a unique patient group that has been thought to present with more severe organ involvement in comparison to their non-Asian counterparts. We set out to perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical manifestations between ancestries, with a focus on Southeast Asian ethnicities and gender.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in conjunction with a meta-analysis to identify differences in prevalences of SLE clinical manifestations. Searches were conducted on Medline for articles comparing between: (i) Asian and non-Asian ancestry; (ii) Southeast Asian ethnicities (Chinese, Malay and Indian); and (iii) male and female Asians. Using random effects model, effect sizes as odd ratios were pooled with DerSimonian and Laird's model.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles were identified and pooled together with our study for this meta-analysis. Comparing among patients of Asian with Non-Asian/European ancestries, no significance difference was found in severe organ manifestations such as renal and neurological involvement [odds ratio (OR): 1.398, p= 0.320 and OR: 1.224, p= 0.526 respectively]. There was significantly greater proportion of Asian SLE patients with thrombocytopenia compared to non-Asian SLE. Chinese SLE patients were less likely to have oral ulcers compared to Indian SLE patients. Lastly, Asian male SLE patients had greater incidence of renal involvement and thrombocytopenia compared to Asian female SLE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe SLE manifestations such as renal and neurological involvement were not significantly more frequent in Asian SLE compared to non-Asian/European SLE in this analysis.

Clinical practice guidance for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus-secondary publication

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) has been recognised as a more acute and severe autoimmune disease than adult-onset SLE. With the development of medications for the disease and supportive therapy, the mortality rate associated with cSLE has drastically improved; the 10-year survival rate among patients with cSLE between 1995 and 2006 in Japan was 98.3%. However, the 10-year survival rate without any permanent functional impairment remained low at 66.1%. Therefore, the current treatment goal for cSLE is to ensure that they can perform normal daily activities throughout their lives by preventing the occurrence and/or progression of organ damage. For this purpose, appropriate treatments and evaluations are required according to the severity and risk of organ damage; however, there are no established guidelines for cSLE. Therefore, the Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan and the Pediatric Rheumatology Subcommittee in the Japan College of Rheumatology developed a comprehensive guidance for clinical practice based on cSLE-related data collected from Japanese national surveys and relevant articles from both domestic and international sources. However, due to the lack of indications for defined and objective evidence quality levels, this guidance should be used on the basis of the judgement of the attending physicians for individual patients.

Morbidity and mortality in antiphospholipid syndrome based on cluster analysis: a 10-year longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Using cluster analysis, to identify the subgroup of patients with APS with the poorest prognosis and clarify the characteristics of that subgroup.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal retrospective cohort study of APS patients. Using clinical data and the profile of aPL, cluster analysis was performed to classify the patients into subgroups. Events were defined as thrombosis, severe bleeding, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients with APS were included. Cluster analysis classified the patients into three subgroups; Cluster A (n = 61): secondary APS, Cluster B (n = 56): accumulation of cardiovascular risks and arterial thrombosis, Cluster C (n = 61): triple positivity of aPL and venous thrombosis. Cluster B showed significantly higher frequency of the events and higher mortality compared with the other clusters (P = 0.0112 for B vs A and P = 0.0471 for B vs C).

CONCLUSION

Using cluster analysis, we clarified the characteristics of the APS patients with the poorest prognosis. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease may further increase events in patients with APS.

A comparison and review of three sets of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus for distinguishing systemic lupus erythematosus from pure mucocutaneous manifestations in the lupus disease spectrum

Although the original purpose of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria was to distinguish SLE from other mimic diseases, and to facilitate sample selection in scientific research, they have become widely used as diagnostic criteria in clinical situations. It is not known yet if regarding classification criteria as diagnostic criteria, what problems might be encountered? This is the first study comparing the three sets of classification criteria for SLE, the 1997 American College of Rheumatology (ACR’97), 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC’12) and 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR’19), for their ability to distinguish patients with SLE from patients with pure mucocutaneous manifestations (isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus without internal disease, i-CLE) in the lupus disease spectrum. 1,865 patients with SLE and 232 patients with i-CLE were recruited from a multicenter study. We found that, due to low specificity, none of the three criteria are adept at distinguishing patients with SLE from patients with i-CLE. SLICC’12 performed best among the original three criteria, but if a positive ANA was removed as an entry criterion, EULAR/ACR’19 would performed better. A review of previous studies that compared the three sets of criteria was presented in this work.

Performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in early disease, across sexes and ethnicities

OBJECTIVES

The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the performance of the new criteria with regard to disease duration, sex and race/ethnicity, and compared its performance against the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria.

METHODS

Twenty-one SLE centres from 16 countries submitted SLE cases and mimicking controls to form the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and white (n=941) patients; with an SLE duration of 1 to <3 years (n=196) and ≥5 years (n=879). Among patients with 1 to <3 years disease duration, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% vs 81%). The EULAR/ACR criteria performed well in men (sensitivity 93%, specificity 96%) and women (sensitivity 97%, specificity 94%). Among women, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% vs 83%) and better specificity than the SLICC criteria (94% vs 82%). Among white patients, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (95% vs 83%) and better specificity than the SLICC criteria (94% vs 83%). The EULAR/ACR criteria performed well among black patients (sensitivity of 98%, specificity 100%), and had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria among Hispanic patients (100% vs 86%) and Asian patients (97% vs 77%).

CONCLUSIONS

The EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria perform well among patients with early disease, men, women, white, black, Hispanic and Asian patients. These criteria have superior sensitivity than the ACR criteria and/or superior specificity than the SLICC criteria across many subgroups.

Validation of the new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus on a patient cohort from a national referral center: a retrospective study

AIM

To validate Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-12 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-97 classification criteria on a patient cohort from the University Hospital Center Zagreb.

METHODS

This retrospective study, conducted from 2014 to 2016, involved 308 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=146) and SLE-allied conditions (n=162). Patients' medical charts were evaluated by an expert rheumatologist to confirm the clinical diagnosis, regardless of the number of the ACR-97 criteria met. Overall sensitivity and specificity, as well as the sensitivity and specificity according to disease duration, were compared between ACR-97 and SLICC-12 classifications. Predictive value for SLE for both classifications was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The SLICC-12 criteria had significantly higher sensitivity in early disase, which increased with disease duration. The ACR-97 criteria had higher specificity. The specificity of the SLICC-12 criteria was low and decreased with disease duration. Regression analysis demonstrated the superiority of the SLICC-12 classification criteria over the ACR-97 criteria, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.801 and 0.780, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the SLICC-12 criteria were superior to the ACR-97 and were more sensitive for diagnosing early SLE, their specificity in our population was too low. The sensitivity of the SLICC-12 classification is increased by better defined clinical features within each criterion. Our results contribute to the current initiative for developing new criteria for SLE.

In an early SLE cohort the ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria classify non-overlapping groups of patients: use of all three criteria ensures optimal capture for clinical studies while their modification earlier classification and treatment

OBJECTIVES

Classification criteria are biased towards classifying long-standing disease. We compared the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-2019, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-2012 and ACR-1997 criteria in an early (median 48 months) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SLE (n=690) or control diseases (n=401). Sensitivity, specificity of the criteria and time-to-classification were calculated. Modified classification algorithms were derived from a random 80% and validated in the remaining 20% of the dataset running multiple iterations.

RESULTS

At last assessment, sensitivities of ACR-1997, SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria were 85.7%, 91.3% and 88.6%, with specificities 93.0%, 93.8% and 97.3%, respectively. Both SLICC and EULAR/ACR enabled earlier classification. Only 76.7% of patients with SLE met all three criteria suggesting non-overlapping groups. Notably, unclassified patients had high prevalence of British Isles Lupus Assessment Group moderate/severe manifestations (43.3%-60%) and SLICC/ACR organ damage (30%-50%). At diagnosis, criteria missed 25.6%-30.5% of patients. Modification of EULAR/ACR and SLICC algorithms to include hypocomplementaemia and/or positive anti-phospholipid antibodies as alternative entry criterion, and/or allow classification with fewer clinical criteria from multiple organs, increased their sensitivity at diagnosis (median 82.0% and 86.2%) and overall (93.7% and 97.1%) with modest decreases in specificity. Importantly, patients who were still missed by the modified criteria had lower incidence of major organ involvement, use of immunosuppressive/biological therapies and organ damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLICC and EULAR/ACR are more sensitive than the ACR and the EULAR/ACR criteria have superior specificity in early SLE, although patients with significant disease can be missed. Combination and/or modification of the classification algorithms may enhance their sensitivity, allowing earlier classification and treatment of more patients with high disease burden.

Comparison among ACR1997, SLICC and the new EULAR/ACR classification criteria in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

To date there are no specific classification criteria for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). This study aims to compare the performance among the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria (SLICC) and the new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR criteria, in a cSLE cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a medical chart review study of cSLE cases and controls with defined rheumatic diseases, both ANA positive, to establish each ACR1997, SLICC and EULAR/ACR criterion fulfilled, at first visit and 1-year-follow-up.

RESULTS

Study population included 122 cSLE cases and 89 controls. At first visit, SLICC criteria had higher sensitivity than ACR 1997 (89.3% versus 70.5%, p <  0.001), but similar specificity (80.9% versus 83.2%, p = 0.791), however performance was not statistically different at 1-year-follow-up. SLICC better scored in specificity compared to EULAR/ACR score ≥ 10 at first visit (80.9% versus 67.4%, p = 0.008) and at 1-year (76.4% versus 58.4%, p = 0.001), although sensitivities were similar. EULAR/ACR criteria score ≥ 10 exhibited higher sensitivity than ACR 1997 (87.7% versus 70.5%, p <  0.001) at first visit, but comparable at 1-year, whereas specificity was lower at first visit (67.4% versus 83.2%, p = 0.004) and 1-year (58.4% versus 76.4%, p = 0.002). A EULAR/ACR score ≥ 13 against a score ≥ 10, resulted in higher specificity, positive predictive value, and cut-off point accuracy. Compared to SLICC, a EULAR/ACR score ≥ 13 resulted in lower sensitivity at first visit (76.2% versus 89.3%, p <  0.001) and 1-year (91% versus 97.5%, p = 0.008), but similar specificities at both assessments. When compared to ACR 1997, a EULAR/ACR total score ≥ 13, resulted in no differences in sensitivity and specificity at both observation periods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cSLE population, SLICC criteria better scored at first visit and 1-year-follow-up. The adoption of a EULAR/ACR total score ≥ 13 in this study, against the initially proposed ≥10 score, was most appropriate to classify cSLE. Further studies are necessary to address if SLICC criteria might allow fulfillment of cSLE classification earlier in disease course and may be more inclusive of cSLE subjects for clinical studies.

Cardiac tamponade as the initial symptom due to systemic lupus erythematosus in a young man: A case report

RATIONALE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a connective tissue disease that has many clinical manifestations. However, cardiac tamponade has been rarely reported especially as an initial presenting feature of systemic lupus erythematosus. Herein, we describe a case of cardiac tamponade as the first presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus in a male and presented the course of diagnosis and treatment of this patient.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 32-year-old male patient developed a rapid progression of pericardial effusion and he was almost healthy in the past. Vital signs were significantly marked by high fever, tachycardia, and accelerated breathing rate of 37 times per minute. The ANA titer was 1:320 and anti-dsDNA was positive during his hospitalization. The complement levels were decreased but the ESR and the CRP level were increased obviously. Soon after, he appeared anemic and thrombocytopenic.

DIAGNOSES

The diagnosis of SLE was made based on the clinical and biochemical findings according to 2012 SLICC SLE Criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions included use CT-guided pericardial puncture to relieve symptoms in time; utilize high-dose glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants to therapy SLE; closely monitor the vital signs, blood routine, blood biochemical indicators, and volume of pericardial effusion.

OUTCOMES

After 2 months, the symptoms were disappeared almost completely and TTE showed his pericardial effusion had decreased significantly.

LESSONS

We should also keep SLE in mind when assessing male patients with pericardial effusions. Early examinations of sero-immunological markers and closely monitoring the performances are important for the diagnosis of the disease. Early pericardial puncture can quickly relieve symptoms and improve prognosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs as potential biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis

To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs as potential biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Biology Medicine (CBM) disc database, and languages were limited in English and Chinese. QUADAS-2 tool was applied to assess the quality of eligible studies. Random-effect model was applied to calculate pooled effects of miRNAs on diagnosing SLE. Subgroup analysis was used to explore the sources of heterogeneity. All data were calculated and analyzed by Meta-Disc 1.4 and RevMan 5.3 software. Six eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of miRNAs were 0.75(95% CI 0.71-0.79), 0.72(95% CI 0.66-0.78), and 8.79(95% CI 4.91-15.73), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 2.71(95% CI 2.20-3.33) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.34(95% CI 0.24-0.48). The area under the curve was 0.787. The subgroup analysis showed that the number of healthy controls might be the sources of heterogeneity. MiRNAs in blood have moderate accuracy and influence on diagnosing SLE, and the exact diagnostic value should be confirmed by further studies.