Antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected children who require a rifamycin-containing regimen for tuberculosis

Survival status and risk factors for mortality among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A retrospective follow-up study

Background

Tuberculosis continues to be a major health concern around the world. It kills an estimated 1.6 million people each year. The World Health Organization (WHO) removed Ethiopia from its list of thirty countries having a high prevalence of MDR/RR-TB in 2021. As a result, the aim of this study was to assess the current context of survival status and risk factors of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2022.

Methods

An institutional-based retrospective cohort study with 245 patients was undertaken using multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients who were recruited from January 1st, 2018 to December 30th, 2021, in St. Peter's specialized hospital. To find independent predictors of survival status, Cox regression analysis was used. An adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value of < 0.05 was used to establish association and statistical significance.

Results

The result of the study revealed that the incidence of mortality in this study was 13.1% (95% CI: 10.3-16.5). Moreover, being male (AOR = 3.7: 95% CI = 1.2, 11.4), old age (AOR = 14: 95% CI = 3.0, 60.4), site of TB (AOR = 0.2: 95% CI = 0.03, 0.6), and presence of comorbidity (AOR = 9.2: 95% CI = 2.4, 35.3), were independent predictors of time to death.

Conclusion

Generally, the death rate among research participants was high. Moreover, male gender, old age, site of tuberculosis, and presence of other comorbidity were predictors of mortality among MDR-TB patients.

Inadequate Lopinavir Concentrations With Modified 8-Hourly Lopinavir/Ritonavir 4:1 Dosing During Rifampicin-based Tuberculosis Treatment in Children Living With HIV

BACKGROUND

Lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations are profoundly reduced when co-administered with rifampicin. Super-boosting of lopinavir/ritonavir is limited by nonavailability of single-entity ritonavir, while double-dosing of co-formulated lopinavir/ritonavir given twice-daily produces suboptimal lopinavir concentrations in young children. We evaluated whether increased daily dosing with modified 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 would maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations of lopinavir in children living with HIV receiving rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment.

METHODS

Children with HIV/tuberculosis coinfection weighing 3.0 to 19.9 kg, on rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment were commenced or switched to 8-hourly liquid lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 with increased daily dosing using weight-band dosing approach. A standard twice-daily dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir was resumed 2 weeks after completing antituberculosis treatment. Plasma sampling was conducted during and 4 weeks after completing antituberculosis treatment.

RESULTS

Of 20 children enrolled; 15, 1-7 years old, had pharmacokinetics sampling available for analysis. Lopinavir concentrations (median [range]) on 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir co-administered with rifampicin (n = 15; area under the curve 0-24 55.32 mg/h/L [0.30-398.7 mg/h/L]; C max 3.04 mg/L [0.03-18.6 mg/L]; C 8hr 0.90 mg/L [0.01-13.7 mg/L]) were lower than on standard dosing without rifampicin (n = 12; area under the curve 24 121.63 mg/h/L [2.56-487.3 mg/h/L]; C max 9.45 mg/L [0.39-26.4 mg/L]; C 12hr 3.03 mg/L [0.01-17.7 mg/L]). During and after rifampicin cotreatment, only 7 of 15 (44.7%) and 8 of 12 (66.7%) children, respectively, achieved targeted pre-dose lopinavir concentrations ≥1mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified 8-hourly dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir failed to achieve adequate lopinavir concentrations with concurrent antituberculosis treatment. The subtherapeutic lopinavir exposures on standard dosing after antituberculosis treatment are of concern and requires further evaluation.

Leveraging physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize dosing for lopinavir/ritonavir with rifampin in pediatric patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Treatment of HIV and tuberculosis co-infection leads to significant mortality in pediatric patients, and treatment can be challenging due to the clinically significant drug-drug interaction (DDI) between lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) and rifampin. Doubling LPV/RTV results in insufficient lopinavir trough concentrations in pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to leverage physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to optimize the adjusted doses of LPV/RTV in children receiving the WHO-revised doses of rifampin (15 mg/kg daily).

DESIGN

Adult and pediatric PBPK models for LPV/RTV with rifampin were developed, including CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inhibition and induction.

SETTING (OR DATA SOURCE)

Data for LPV/RTV model development and evaluation were available from the pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

PATIENTS

Dosing simulations were next performed to optimize dosing in children (2 months to 8 years of age).

INTERVENTION

Exposure following super-boosted LPV/RTV with 10 and 15 mg/kg PO daily rifampin was simulated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Simulated parameters were within twofold observations for LPV, RTV, and rifampin in adults and children ≥2 weeks old. The model predicted that, in healthy adults receiving 400/100 mg oral LPV/RTV twice daily (BID), co-treatment with 600 mg oral rifampin daily decreased the steady-state area under the concentration vs. time curve of LPV by 79%, in line with the observed change of 75%. Simulated and observed concentration profiles were comparable for LPV/RTV (230/57.5 mg/m² ) PO BID without rifampin and 230/230 mg/m² LPV/RTV PO BID with 10 mg/kg PO daily rifampin in pediatric patients. Sixteen mg/kg of super-boosted LPV (LPV/RTV 1:1) PO BID with 15 mg/kg PO daily rifampin achieved simulated LPV troughs >1 mg/L in ≥93% of virtual children weighing 3.0-24.9 kg, which was comparable with 10 mg/kg PO daily rifampin.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-boosted LPV/RTV with 15 mg/kg rifampin achieves therapeutic LPV troughs in HIV/TB-infected simulated children.

Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy for Patients Coinfected With Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Multicenter, Noncomparative, Open-label, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The concurrent treatment of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is challenging, owing to drug interactions, overlapping toxicities, and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). The efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) were assessed in adults with HIV and drug-susceptible tuberculosis.

METHODS

International Study of Patients with HIV on Rifampicin ING is a noncomparative, active-control, randomized, open-label study in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naive adults (CD4+ ≥50 cells/mm3). Participants on rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment ≤8 weeks were randomized (3:2) to receive DTG (50 mg twice daily both during and 2 weeks after tuberculosis therapy, then 50 mg once daily) or efavirenz (EFV; 600 mg daily) with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of DTG-arm participants with plasma HIV-1-RNA <50 copies/mL (responders) by the Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm (intent-to-treat exposed population) at Week 48. The study was not powered to compare arms.

RESULTS

For DTG (n = 69), the baseline HIV-1 RNA was >100 000 copies/mL in 64% of participants, with a median CD4+ count of 208 cells/mm3; for EFV (n = 44), 55% of participants had HIV-1 RNA >100 000 copies/mL, with a median CD4+ count of 202 cells/mm3. The Week 48 response rates were 75% (52/69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 65-86%) for DTG and 82% (36/44, 95% CI 70-93%) for EFV. The DTG nonresponses were driven by non-treatment related discontinuations (n = 10 lost to follow-up). There were no deaths or study drug switches. There were 2 discontinuations for toxicity (EFV). There were 3 protocol-defined virological failures (2 DTG, no acquired resistance; 1 EFV, emergent resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors). The tuberculosis treatment success rate was high. Tuberculosis-associated IRIS was uncommon (4/arm), with no discontinuations for IRIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with HIV receiving rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment, twice-daily DTG was effective and well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02178592.

Virologic response to efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy in children with previous exposure to antiretrovirals to prevent mother-to-child transmission

Efavirenz-based first-line regimens have been widely used for children ≥3 years of age starting antiretroviral therapy, despite possible resistance with prior exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT). We used logistic regression to examine the association between PMTCT exposure and viral failure (VF) defined as two consecutive viral loads (VL)>1000 copies/ml between 6–18 months on ART. Children with previous nevirapine exposure for PMTCT were not at higher risk of VF compared to unexposed children (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 0.79; 95% CI:0.56, 1.11).

The potential of plant systems to break the HIV-TB link

Tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can place a major burden on healthcare systems and constitute the main challenges of diagnostic and therapeutic programmes. Infection with HIV is the most common cause of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), which can accelerate the risk of latent TB reactivation by 20-fold. Similarly, TB is considered the most relevant factor predisposing individuals to HIV infection. Thus, both pathogens can augment one another in a synergetic manner, accelerating the failure of immunological functions and resulting in subsequent death in the absence of treatment. Synergistic approaches involving the treatment of HIV as a tool to combat TB and vice versa are thus required in regions with a high burden of HIV and TB infection. In this context, plant systems are considered a promising approach for combatting HIV and TB in a resource-limited setting because plant-made drugs can be produced efficiently and inexpensively in developing countries and could be shared by the available agricultural infrastructure without the expensive requirement needed for cold chain storage and transportation. Moreover, the use of natural products from medicinal plants can eliminate the concerns associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and anti-TB therapy (ATT), including drug interactions, drug-related toxicity and multidrug resistance. In this review, we highlight the potential of plant system as a promising approach for the production of relevant pharmaceuticals for HIV and TB treatment. However, in the cases of HIV and TB, none of the plant-made pharmaceuticals have been approved for clinical use. Limitations in reaching these goals are discussed.

HIV-associated pediatric tuberculosis: prevention, diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The detrimental synergy of colliding HIV and tuberculosis (TB) epidemics is most devastating among children and adolescents living with HIV (CALWH) who shoulder a disproportionate burden of all child TB mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

CALWH benefit less from Bacille-Calmette Guerin vaccination than HIV-uninfected children and are not receiving TB preventive therapy despite global recommendations. Further, the predictive utility of most diagnostic tools is reduced in CALWH. Finally, antiretroviral and anti-TB drug interactions continue to complicate cotreatment for children. Despite these challenges, recent data fuel a new awareness of TB as a hidden cause of child mortality and a renewed commitment to TB prevention. New diagnostic approaches using existing tools with novel specimens, such as stool, may improve the diagnosis of TB in CALWH. Further, pharmacokinetic studies and the development of new drug formulations promise better treatment options for CALWH in the near future.

SUMMARY

With the awareness that TB is the leading cause of mortality among CALWH, comes a responsibility to accelerate research to prevent, diagnose and treat TB in this vulnerable population. In the present, we must adopt evidence-based preventive and treatment strategies to enhance outcomes of CALWH and combating TB.

Survival analysis of time to cure on multi-drug resistance tuberculosis patients in Amhara region, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is caused by bacteria that are resistant to the most effective anti-tuberculosis drug. The MDR-TB is an increasing global problem and the spread of MDR-TB has different recovery time for different patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the recovery time of MDR-TB patients in Amhara region, Ethiopia.

METHOD

A retrospective study was carried out in seven hospitals having MDR-TB treatment center of Amhara region, Ethiopia from September 2015 to February 2018. An accelerated failure time and parametric shared frailty models were employed.

RESULTS

The study revealed that the recovery time of MDR-TB patients in Amhara region was 21 months. Out of the total MDR-TB patients, 110 (35.4%) censored and 201 (64.6%) cured of MDR-TB. The clustering effect of frailty model was hospitals and the Weibull-gamma shared frailty model was selected among all and hence used for this study. The study showed that extra pulmonary MDR-TB patients had longer recovery time than that of seamier pulmonary MDR-TB patients in Amhara region, Ethiopia. According to this study, male MDR-TB patients, MDR-TB patients with co-morbidity and clinical complication were experiencing longer recovery time than that of the counter groups. This study also showed that MDR-TB patients with poor adherence had longer recovery time than those with good adherence MDR-TB patients.

CONCLUSION

Among different factors considered in this study, MDR-TB type, clinical complication, adherence, co-morbidities, sex, and smoking status had a significant effect on recovery time of MDR-TB patients in Amhara region, Ethiopia. In conclusion, the Regional and Federal Government of Ethiopia should take immediate steps to address causes of recovery time of MDR-TB patients in Amhara region through encouraging adherence, early case detection, and proper handling of drug-susceptibility according to WHO guidelines.

Lopinavir-ritonavir super-boosting in young HIV-infected children on rifampicin-based tuberculosis therapy compared with lopinavir-ritonavir without rifampicin: a pharmacokinetic modelling and clinical study

BACKGROUND

Rifampicin reduces lopinavir concentrations in HIV and tuberculosis co-treated patients. We hypothesised that adding ritonavir to co-formulated lopinavir-ritonavir (4:1) to achieve a one-to-one ratio would overcome this drug-drug interaction in young children.

METHODS

We did a prospective, open-label, one-group, one-sequence study at five sites in three South African provinces. We included HIV-infected children with tuberculosis, a bodyweight of 3-15 kg, and a post-conceptional age of more than 42 weeks. Children received the standard four-to-one ratio of lopinavir-ritonavir in the absence of rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis treatment, whereas super-boosting of lopinavir-ritonavir with additional ritonavir was given orally twice a day to achieve a one-to-one ratio during rifampicin treatment. The primary outcome was the comparison of the proportion of children with predicted lopinavir morning minimum concentrations (Cmin) of more than 1·0 mg/L during super-boosting with the proportion of more than 1·0 mg/L during standard lopinavir-ritonavir treatment without rifampicin. Lopinavir concentrations were determined before and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 10 h after the morning dose during the second and the last month of tuberculosis co-treatment, and 4-6 weeks after stopping rifampicin. A non-linear mixed-effects model was implemented to interpret the data and Monte Carlo simulations were used to compare the percentage of lopinavir with morning Cmin values of less than 1·0 mg/L for the two dosing schemes. A non-inferiority margin of 10% was used. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02348177.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 30, 2013, and Nov 9, 2015, 96 children with a median age of 18·2 months (IQR 9·6-26·8) were enrolled. Of these 96 children, 80 (83%) completed the first three pharmacokinetic evaluations. Tuberculosis therapy was started before antiretrovirals in 70 (73%) children. The model-predicted percentage of morning Cmin of less than 1·0 mg/L after tuberculosis treatment without super-boosting was 8·8% (95% CI 0·6-19·8) versus 7·6% (0·4-16·2) during super-boosting and tuberculosis treatment. The difference of -1·1% (95% CI -6·9 to 3·2), at a non-inferiority margin of 10%, confirmed the non-inferiority of lopinavir trough concentrations during rifampicin co-treatment. 19 serious adverse events were reported in 12 participants. Three deaths and a temporary treatment interruption due to jaundice were unrelated to study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Lopinavir exposure with ritonavir super-boosting in a one-to-one ratio during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment was non-inferior to the exposure with lopinavir-ritonavir without rifampicin. Safe and effective, field application of super-boosting is limited by poor acceptability. Access to better adapted solid formulations will most likely facilitate public health implementation of this strategy.

FUNDING

DNDi, French Development Agency, UBS Optimus Foundation, and Unitaid.

Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Children With Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is the major cause of mortality in HIV-infected children globally. Current guidelines about the management of antiretroviral therapy in children with TB are based on a limited number of nonrandomized studies involving small numbers of participants. The aim of the study was to systematically retrieve and critically appraise available evidence on the efficacy and safety of different antiretroviral regimens in children with HIV infection who are receiving treatment for active TB.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Records were retrieved through March 2016 from Medline, Embase and manual screening of key conference proceedings. Four specific research questions assessing available treatment options were defined.

RESULTS

Although 4 independent searches were conducted (1 for each Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes question), results were elaborated and interpreted together because of significant overlap among the retrieved records. Six observational studies were selected for qualitative synthesis while meta-analysis could not be performed.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for optimal treatment options for HIV/TB coinfected children is limited. As the global community strives to reach the fast-track HIV treatment targets and eliminate childhood TB deaths, it must ensure that coinfected children are included in key treatment studies and expand this neglected but crucial area of research.