The biologics of ulcerative colitis

Bletilla striata carbon dots with alleviating effect of DSS-induced ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that significantly affected quality of life for patients. In this study, carbon dots based on Bletilla striata (BS-CDs) were synthesized by hydrothermal method and characterized by optical property analysis. In addition, the study measured the potential effect of BS-CDs on colonic histopathology and inflammation in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis. The results suggested that BS-CDs significantly increased colon length, improved colonic histopathology, and reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) in colitis mice. Taken together, BS-CDs alleviate clinical inflammation by blocking pro-inflammatory cytokines which were expected to be a potential agent for the treatment of colitis.

Safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis: Data from TOFA-UC, a SN-IBD study

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence is needed to determine the value of tofacitinib (TOFA) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To assess the safety and effectiveness of TOFA in clinical practice.

METHODS

TOFA-UC is a multicenter, observational study performed among the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). All consecutive patients with UC starting TOFA from its introduction in Sicily (July 2021) to July 2022 were included.

RESULTS

111 patients were included (mean follow-up: 31.7 ± 14.9 weeks; biologic-experienced: 92.8%). Nineteen adverse events were reported (17.1%; incidence rate: 28.2 per 100 patient years), including 11 cases of hypercholesterolemia and 3 infections (no cases of herpes zoster reactivation. At week 8, the rates of clinical response, steroid free clinical remission, and CRP normalization were 74.8%, 45.0%, and 56.9%, respectively, and 68.5%, 51.4%, and 65.2%, respectively, at the end of follow-up. Eighteen patients experienced a loss of response after successful induction (21.7%; incidence rate: 33.2 per 100 patient years). Twenty-six patients (23.4%) discontinued TOFA over time, of whom 3 due to AEs, and 23 to non response or loss of response.

CONCLUSIONS

TOFA is safe and effective in patients with UC, including those with history of multiple failures to biological therapies.

Potential activity of Traditional Chinese Medicine against Ulcerative colitis: A review

ETHNIC PHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Plant materials are used as complementary and alternative therapies all over the world for the treatment of various diseases. Ulcerative colitis (UC), a chronic nonspecific inflammatory bowel disease listed as one of the modern refractory diseases by the World Health Organization, has a long course, is challenging to cure, and is prone to cause cancer. Recent years have witnessed a growing trend of applying traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to UC.

AIM OF THIS REVIEW

This review presents an overview of the pathogenesis of UC and reports the therapeutic effect of TCM on UC (including TCM prescriptions, single TCM, and treatments using TCM ingredients) to provide a theoretical basis for the use of TCM in treating UC.

METHODS

We performed a collection and collation of relevant scientific articles from different scientific databases regarding TCM and its usefulness in treating UC. In this paper, the therapeutic effect of TCM is summarized and analyzed according to the existing experimental and clinical research.

RESULTS

There are positive signs that TCM primarily regulates inflammatory cytokines, intestinal flora, and the immune system, and also protects the intestinal mucosa. Hence, it can play a role in treating UC.

CONCLUSION

TCM has a definite curative effect in the treatment of UC. It can alleviate and treat UC in a variety of ways. We should take syndrome differentiation and treatment differentiation as the basis. With the help of modern medicine, TCM's clinical curative effects can be enhanced for the treatment of UC.

Use of biologics and small molecule drugs for the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: IG-IBD clinical guidelines based on the GRADE methodology

The management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis has undergone significant changes over the past 15 years due to the regulatory approval of several new drugs. In particular, following the approval of the first biological, i.e. infliximab, a number of further biological drugs, such as adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, and small molecules, such as tofacitinib, have been approved, thus enriching the therapeutic armamentarium for ulcerative colitis. Choice of therapy must take into consideration not only the need to induce and maintain disease remission according to the patient's profile, but also age, co-morbidities, and prior treatments. To guide these decisions, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease has developed clinical guidelines that supersede its earlier document from 2011. These new guidelines were developed following the GRADE methodology for rating the quality of the evidence and for determining the strength of the recommendations. This article presents the methodology and results, in the form of 20 statements with commentary on the use of the five biologics and tofacitinib for managing the intestinal manifestations of active ulcerative colitis and for maintaining remission. A separate technical review reports the analyses of the evidence upon which the present recommendations are based.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Clinical, Endoscopic, Histological and Safety Placebo Rates in Induction and Maintenance Trials of Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Quantifying placebo rates and the factors influencing them are essential to inform trial design. We provide a contemporary summary of clinical, endoscopic, histological and safety placebo rates in induction and maintenance clinical trials of ulcerative colitis, and identify factors influencing them.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from April 2014 to April 2020, updating a prior meta-analysis that searched from inception to April 2014. We included placebo-controlled trials of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressives, small-molecules and biologics in adults with ulcerative colitis. Placebo rates were pooled using random-effects and mixed-effects meta-regression models to assess the associated study-level.

RESULTS

In 119 trials [92 induction, 27 maintenance] clinical, endoscopic and histological remission placebo rates for induction trials were 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-13%), 19% [95% CI 15-23%] and 15% [95% CI 11-19%], respectively; for maintenance trials, clinical and endoscopic placebo remission rates were 18% [95% CI 12-25%] and 20% [95% CI 15-25%], respectively. Higher endoscopic subscore and a higher rate of exposure to prior biologic therapy at enrolment were associated with lower clinical and endoscopic placebo remission rates. Absence of central reading was associated with an increase in placebo endoscopic response and remission rates. More follow-up visits and increasing trial duration were associated with higher clinical placebo rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Placebo rates in ulcerative colitis trials vary according to the endpoint assessed, whether it is for assessment of response or remission, and whether the trial is designed for induction or maintenance. These contemporary rates across different endpoints and drug classes will help to inform trial design.

Effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A single-arm meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Several observational studies on Tofacitinib (TOFA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) have been published over the last 2 years.

AIMS

To estimate effectiveness and safety of TOFA arising from real-world experience.

METHODS

PubMed Central/Medline and Embase were systematically searched for real-world observational studies on TOFA for the treatment of UC through November 2020.

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate rates were 49% for clinical response, 40% for clinical remission, and 34% for corticosteroid-free clinical remission at induction, while the rates of endoscopic response and endoscopic remission were 37% and 19%, respectively. At maintenance, the pooled estimate rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission were 36%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. The pooled estimate of incidence rate of adverse events was 53.0 per 100 person-years (PY), while the pooled estimate of incidence rate of withdrawal of TOFA due to adverse events was 9.3 per 100 PY, with a pooled rate of infections of 17.6 per 100 PY.

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative analysis of data from real-world studies confirmed the good efficacy of TOFA in UC shown by randomized controlled trials for both induction and maintenance, while the safety profile was consistent with previous reports.

Biosimilars: The viewpoint of Italian patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The viewpoint on biosimilars among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is largely unknown.

AIMS

We aimed at exploring the confidence and opinion on biosimilars among Italian patients with IBD.

METHODS

An anonymous, 20-item, questionnaire was sent via e-mail to all members of the Italian IBD patients' association (AMICI Onlus). Three sets of questions were formulated: 1: Characteristics of respondents; 2: The use of biologics and biosimilars in clinical practice; 3: General opinions on biologics and biosimilars.

RESULTS

Of the 4,302 total surveys sent, there were 1,749 respondents (response rate: 40.6%). There was an equal distribution between males and females (48.3% and 51.7%, respectively), and between patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (46.9% and 51.3%, respectively), while most of the patients were aged between 19 and 45 years and between 46 and 65 years (45.5% and 42.0%, respectively). Approximately 45% of the respondents declared to have never been informed about the existence of biosimilars. The great majority of patients (73.9%) did not know if originators and biosimilars could be considered equivalent, or if efficacy or safety of biosimilars could be lower than those of originators. Approximately half of the respondents (53.5%) had no idea that the use of low-cost biosimilars could be useful to increase the overall economic resources for the treatment of IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

An extensive lack of knowledge and confidence in biosimilars exists among Italian patients with IBD. Efforts carried out by scientific societies and IBD patients' associations are required to overcome this issue.

Real-Life Comparison of Different Anti-TNF Biologic Therapies for Ulcerative Colitis Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Head-to-head comparison studies evaluating the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs in inflammatory bowel disease patients are lacking.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-TNF-α drugs used in clinical practice in a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Retrospectively, 122 UC patients treated with infliximab (IFX) originator and biosimilar, adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) were included. We performed an ITT analysis to evaluate clinical response and remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and endoscopy response according to the different time points of the follow-up. Baseline and post induction predictor factors of these outcomes were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models. Moreover, a propensity score-based weighting analysis was performed. Data were analyzed using R and STATA11 software.

RESULTS

The overall clinical response was 77% after induction, 81.4% at 30 weeks, and 76.9% at 52 weeks, while the steroid-free clinical remission was 39.7, 46, and 54.6%, respectively. After induction, a higher rate of treatment failure was observed in the GOL group. At the end of follow-up, lower rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response were obtained by GOL. At week 52, endoscopic response was achieved by 46.5% of the population.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the different anti-TNF treatments, moderate-to-severe UC seems to respond better to IFX and ADA, whereas GOL seems to be less effective, despite a similar good safety profile.

Factors Affecting Clinical and Endoscopic Outcomes of Placebo Arm in Trials of Biologics and Small Molecule Drugs in Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous systematic cumulative analyses of the placebo arm in ulcerative colitis (UC) were limited by the wide heterogeneity in the scores and definitions of response. We aimed at estimating the placebo rates of remission, response, and mucosal healing (MH) in phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials of biologics and small molecule drugs that used homogeneous criteria for the assessment of outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed Central, Embase, and reference lists of articles were systematically searched through July 2017. Only studies that employed the Mayo score were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-one randomized placebo-controlled trials consisting of 2702 patients met the inclusion criteria. At induction, the pooled estimates of the placebo rates of remission, response, and MH were 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-12%; range: 0%-29%; I2 = 75.0%), 34% (95% CI, 31%-38%; range: 12%-75%; I2 = 61.3%), and 26% (95% CI, 22%-30%; range: 2%-65%; I2 = 77.7%), respectively. At maintenance, the pooled estimates of the placebo rates of remission, response, and MH were 14% (95% CI, 10%-18%; range: 6%-30%; I2 = 73.0%), 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%; range: 18%-36%; I2 = 53.0%), and 19% (95% CI, 15%-23%; range: 12%-30%; I2 = 65.0%), respectively. Among the variables assessed by logistic regression analysis, multiple factors influenced the outcomes of placebo arms, including concomitant systemic steroids at baseline, endoscopic central reading, being naïve or non-naïve to anti-TNFs, and disease duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the wide use of homogeneous criteria for the assessment of clinical and endoscopic outcomes, a high heterogeneity among placebo arms of modern trials in UC still exists.

A real life comparison of the effectiveness of adalimumab and golimumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, supported by propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab and golimumab are effective in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

AIMS

We reported the comparative effectiveness of adalimumab and golimumab in ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

118 patients treated with adalimumab and 79 treated with golimumab were included and evaluated at 8 weeks and at the end of follow up.

RESULTS

Overall clinical benefit was 72.6% at 8 weeks and 58.9% at the end of follow up. Patients with longer disease duration and those treated with adalimumab had a better outcome. Clinical benefit was 78.8% in adalimumab patients and 63.3% in golimumab patients (p = 0.026) after 8 weeks; it was 66.9% in adalimumab patients and 46.8% in golimumab patients (p = 0.008) at the end of follow up. These data were confirmed by propensity score analysis. A further analysis considering adalimumab optimization as treatment failure showed that the difference between adalimumab and golimumab was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab and golimumab are effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Adalimumab seems to be more effective than golimumab. This difference is probably affected by the impossibility of golimumab to be optimized in Italy while adalimumab is.

Pelvic MRI and CT images are interchangeable for measuring peripouch fat

A total of 27 pouch patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, who underwent pelvic MRI-DIXON and CT scan within one year, were included. Peripouch fat areas were measured at the middle height level of pouch (AreaM) and the highest level of pouch (AreaH). Our results demonstrated that measurements of perianal fat thickness, AreaM and AreaH based on MRI image were accurate and reproducible (correlation efficiency(r): intraobserver: 0.984–0.991; interobserver: 0.969–0.971; all P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that more than 92.593% (25/27) of dots fell within the limits of agreement. We also identified strong agreements between CT and MRI image in measuring perianal fat thickness(r = 0.823, P < 0.001), AreaM (r = 0.773, P < 0.001) and AreaH (r = 0.862, P < 0.001). Interchangeable calculating formula to normalize measurements between CT and MRI images were created: Thickness_CT = 0.610 × Thickness_MRI + 0.853; AreaM_CT = 0.865 × AreaM_MRI + 1.392; AreaH_CT = 0.508 × AreaH_MRI + 15.001. In conclusion, pelvic MRI image is a feasible and reproducible method for quantifying peripouch fat. Pelvic MRI and CT images are interchangeable in retrospective measurements of peripouch fat, which will foster future investigation of the role of mesentery fat in colorectal diseases.