Rituximab biosimilars for lymphoma in Europe

The Path to Accessible Care: Development and Impact of Eculizumab Biosimilars for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting complement C5, is the first approved drug for complement-mediated diseases and indicated to treat paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, myasthenia gravis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The introduction of eculizumab has improved the prognosis of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to near-normal life expectancy and quality of life. Administration of eculizumab resulted in a rapid and sustained reduction in hemolytic activity and a consequent risk of thrombosis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and thrombotic microangiopathy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, respectively. Nevertheless, many patients still have difficulty accessing eculizumab treatment because of its high costs. Biosimilars to reference eculizumab may increase patient access to treatment by creating market competition and eventually decreasing treatment costs. Clinical use of biosimilars in Europe in the last 15 years has demonstrated that they are as safe and effective as their reference products, and can also drive cost reductions and increase patients' access to treatment. This review aims to increase awareness about the importance of biosimilars of reference eculizumab and their entry for use in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome based on the accumulated experience of other previously approved biosimilars, and to provide an overview of the stringent biosimilar development pathway in general and the concept of extrapolation in particular.

Biosimilars: A Critical Review of Development, Regulatory Landscape, and Clinical Implications

The biopharmaceutical industry has witnessed significant growth in the development and approval of biosimilars. These biosimilars aim to provide cost-effective alternatives to expensive originator biosimilars, alleviating financial pressures within healthcare. The manufacturing of biosimilars is a highly complex process that involves several stages, each of which must meet strict regulatory standards to ensure that the final product is highly similar to the reference biologic. To gain regulatory approval, biosimilars must undergo rigorous analytical characterization including in vitro assays, bioanalytical evaluations, and clinical similarity studies like pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments-to demonstrate safety, efficacy, quality comparability with reference products. Leading regulatory agencies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) have established stringent guidelines for biosimilar evaluation and post-marketing surveillance. Despite this regulatory clarity, challenges around interchangeability, market exclusivity, and patent protection often delay market access and limit adoption, particularly in regions where automatic substitution is restricted. Case studies of biosimilars such as rituximab, adalimumab, filgrastim, and trastuzab reveal both advancements and ongoing hurdles in achieving broader market integration. The introduction of biosimilars has shown potential to reduce healthcare costs; for example, a recent analysis indicates a 20-30% cost reduction in the U.S. due to biosimilar adoption. As the biosimilar market expands, collaborative efforts among regulatory bodies, industry stakeholders, and healthcare providers are essential to enhance access to biologic therapies. This collaboration is poised to improve patient outcomes and catalyse transformative change in global healthcare systems.

Antibody-Based Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies

Despite the great advancements in treatment strategies for hematological malignancies (HMs) over the years, their effective treatment remains challenging. Conventional treatment strategies are burdened with several serious drawbacks limiting their effectiveness and safety. Improved understanding of tumor immunobiology has provided novel anti-cancer strategies targeting selected immune response components. Currently, immunotherapy is counted as the fourth pillar of oncological treatment (together with surgery, chemo- and radiotherapy) and is becoming standard in the treatment regimen, alone or in combination therapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are currently being assessed in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. However, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives have achieved the most notable clinical outcome so far. Since the approval of rituximab for treating B-cell malignancies, the availability of mAbs against tumor-specific surface molecules for clinical use has flourished. Antibody-based therapy has become one of the most successful strategies for immunotherapeutic cancer treatment in the last few decades, and many mAbs have already been introduced into standard treatment protocols for some hematologic malignancies. To further increase the efficacy of mAbs, they can be conjugated to radioisotopes or cytostatic drugs, so-called antibody-drug conjugates. Moreover, with the growing recognition of T-cell immunity's role in cancer development, strategies aimed at enhancing T cell activation and inhibiting mechanisms that suppress T cell function are actively being developed. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of immunotherapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and checkpoint inhibitors, approved for the treatment of various HMs.

A Nomogram-Based Prognostic Model for Lymphoma Patients Initially Presenting with Fever of Unknown Origin

Background

Patients with lymphoma who present with fever of unknown origin (FUO) as an initial symptom lack specific clinical feature analysis, prognostic factor analysis, and existing prognostic models. We aim to create a prognostic model for these patients to improve prognosis and risk assessment.

Methods

A total of 555 lymphoma patients with FUO as initial symptom studied at Huadong Hospital affiliated with Fudan University. Univariable Cox regression identified outcome predictors, analyzed by LASSO Cox. Multifactorial Cox on screened coefficients determined independent prognostic factors and nomogram model. The validity of the nomogram was evaluated through bootstrap sampling, calibration curves for model calibration, time-dependent ROC curve analysis for discrimination assessment, and decision curve analysis for evaluating clinical usefulness. Further validation involved utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and Log rank tests. Lastly, X-tile software determined the optimal cutoff point for the nomogram score by comparing it with the traditional International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system.

Results

The entire cohort was divided into a training cohort (n=388) and a validation cohort (n=167). These risk factors (cell pathologic type, performance status score, Ann Arbor staging, thrombocytopenia, and raised direct bilirubin) were used to construct a web-based dynamic survival rate calculator for lymphoma patients initially presenting with FUO. The lymphoma-specific nomogram demonstrated good consistency and efficacy in predicting the model's risk stratification. Compared to the IPI scoring system, the nomogram model had higher AUC values for different clinical endpoints. The new nomogram prognostic model showed better differentiation of risk groups compared to traditional IPI scoring.

Conclusion

Our study developed and validated a prognostic nomogram for lymphoma patients initially presenting with FUO, demonstrating robust predictive efficacy and risk stratification ability. Furthermore, we have successfully implemented this model into a web-based dynamic survival rate calculator.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Rituximab Biosimilar RTXM83: A Retrospective Extension Study in Brazilian Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

RTXM83, a biosimilar of rituximab, was approved after physicochemical, functional, non-clinical, and clinical studies demonstrated their similarity; these studies included RTXM83-AC-01-11, a multicentric double-blind international prospective pivotal study. Long-term data on biosimilars can potentially elucidate their clinical robustness and facilitate their broader adoption.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed a dataset from a Brazilian cohort previously randomized in the RTXM83-AC-01-11 study followed by the assessment of long-term outcomes in an observational extension phase from randomization in the RTXM83-AC-01-11 study to the last recorded evaluation. Patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) received either reference rituximab (R) or RTXM83 plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) as adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 77.0 months. Patients with initial DLBCL stages III and IV comprised 50% of the R-CHOP group and 40% of the biosimilar group. Five (18.5%) patients, including two RTXM83-CHOP-treated and three R-CHOP-treated individuals, experienced late adverse events (AEs) of interest. No new safety signs were established. At the final assessment, the progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 93.3% and 50.0% in the RTXM83-CHOP and R-CHOP groups, respectively. Median PFS was not achieved in the RTXM83-CHOP group, which was 40.5 months in the R-CHOP group. The overall survival (OS) rates were 100% and 66.7% in the RTXM83-CHOP and R-CHOP groups, respectively. The median OS was not reached in any group.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the long-term safety and effectiveness of RTXM83 in treating DLBCL; outcomes comparable to those of the reference product and potentially improved access to treatment have been indicated. However, further research with more diverse patient groups can validate these findings and advocate the broader adoption of biosimilars in cancer care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04928573. June 16, 2021, "retrospectively registered".

The efficacy and safety of rituximab with or without glucocorticoid in inducing remission of MCD with different clinical presentations in adults: a retrospective study

Background

To investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) with or without glucocorticoid (GC) in inducing remission of minimal change disease (MCD) in adults.

Methods

Twenty-one adult MCD patients were included in the study. The patients were assigned to the following three groups according to their background before RTX treatment: an RTX single drug direct induction treatment group (Group A; n = 9), a short-term, low-dose GC combined with RTX induction treatment group (Group B; n = 4), and a short-term, adequate-dose GC-induced remission and RTX maintenance treatment group (Group C; n = 8). The primary endpoints were the time to induction of remission and the rate of clinical remission at 12 months.

Results

All patients achieved clinical remission, with 19 (90.48%) achieving complete remission (CR), and the median remission time was 4 (2.5, 12) weeks. Eight (88.89%) patients in Group A achieved CR, and the median remission time was 3 (2.25, 14) weeks. In Group B, three (75.00%) patients achieved CR, with a median remission time of 4 (4, 10) weeks. In Group C, eight (100.00%) patients achieved CR, and the median remission time was 3.5 (2, 4) weeks.

Conclusions

In MCD patients without acute kidney injury, adequate RTX alone or short-term combined treatment with low-dose GCs can effectively induce and maintain MCD remission. Adequate short-term GCs combined with RTX maintenance may be an effective alternative for MCD patients in context of acute kidney injury. There is a need to investigate different induction therapy regimens for the remission of MCD patients with different backgrounds.

Incidence, clinical features, and survival outcomes of primary malignant lacrimal gland tumors: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies on the epidemiological information and prognosis of primary malignant lacrimal gland tumors (MLGTs) are rare for its low occurrence. The goal of our research was to investigate the epidemiological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with MLGTs.

METHODS

Incidence and demographic information of patients with MLGTs were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. To identify independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS), univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of primary MLGTs from 1975 to 2020 was 0.413/1,000,000 (according to the 2000 American standard population), with a steadily increasing incidence over years. A total of 964 patients with primary MLGTs were diagnosed, with an average age of 59.3 years. Of these, 53.2% were aged ≥60 years, 57.4% were female, and 77.1% were whites. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that year of diagnosis, age, sex, histological type, SEER stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of DSS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although primary MLGT is rare, its incidence has steadily increased in the past 46 years, and surgery was related to a better prognosis.

The comparison of safety and cost between reference drug of rituximab and its biosimilar Riximyo in lymphoproliferative disorders and other hematological diseases. Single center experience

Rituximab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has broad clinical application. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and cost of the original reference rituximab (MabThera) and its biosimilar (Riximyo). This retrospective analysis of 262 patients receiving Riximyo in the Department of Hematology of Wroclaw Medical University in Poland from the period of 1 October 2020 to 21 June 2021 focused on infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which occurred in 4,96% of patients (N = 13). 109 patients (41,6%) had previously been treated with the reference drug and 2 IRRs were reported after switching therapy. During the study period, after biosimilar introduction, the cost of rituximab decreased by 41%. Rixmyo while maintaining similar safety profile is much more cost-effective.

Therapeutic Antibodies in Medicine

Antibody engineering has developed into a wide-reaching field, impacting a multitude of industries, most notably healthcare and diagnostics. The seminal work on developing the first monoclonal antibody four decades ago has witnessed exponential growth in the last 10-15 years, where regulators have approved monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics and for several diagnostic applications, including the remarkable attention it garnered during the pandemic. In recent years, antibodies have become the fastest-growing class of biological drugs approved for the treatment of a wide range of diseases, from cancer to autoimmune conditions. This review discusses the field of therapeutic antibodies as it stands today. It summarizes and outlines the clinical relevance and application of therapeutic antibodies in treating a landscape of diseases in different disciplines of medicine. It discusses the nomenclature, various approaches to antibody therapies, and the evolution of antibody therapeutics. It also discusses the risk profile and adverse immune reactions associated with the antibodies and sheds light on future applications and perspectives in antibody drug discovery.

LncRNA OR2A1-AS1 index predicts survival in germinal center-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) has been evaluated as prognostic markers in various carcinomas. However, the prognostic value of the lncRNA index in DLBCL has not been fully understood. Hence, this study aimed to identify the prognostic value of lncRNA olfactory receptor family 2 subfamily A member 1-antisense RNA 1 (OR2A1-AS1) in DLBCL.

METHODS

The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to obtain the GSE97336 dataset comprising lncRNA expression profiles. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) was conducted to evaluate the expression of OR2A1-AS1 in 98 cases of DLBCL.

RESULTS

OR2A1-AS1 expression was considerably reduced in DLBCL patients, reduced OR2A1-AS1 expression was linked to a shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in DLBCL patients, especially those with the germinal center B-cell-like subtype (GCB). Multivariate analysis (MVA) revealed that the OR2A1-AS1 index had prognostic significance. Patients with low OR2A1-AS1 expression have a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

OR2A1-AS may represent an effective predictor of patients' outcomes with DLBCL.

Monoclonal antibodies used for the management of haematological disorders

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies Ab (MoAb) are increasingly becoming part of therapeutic armamentarium for haematologists and haemato-oncologists. This review brings together commonly used antibodies in one place for brevity and novel understanding.

AREAS COVERED

Pubmed and Scopus databases were explored focusing on MoAb in clinical haematological practice. Emphasis was given to current review articles. The data base was searched from 1997 till present. 24 different antibodies, most of which are in use were discussed. Antibodies are used for diverse conditions i.e. malignant and benign haematological conditions, treatment at various phases of stem cell transplantation. These antibodies were used both alone or in combination with various chemotherapy, targeted small molecules or as immunoconjugates. Some of the side effect profiles of these antibodies were common and some were unique. Unusual infections or organ dysfunctions were noted. Improved function of antibodies by protein engineering is also advancing rapidly. Dosage, frequency and route of administration depended on the convenience and condition for which the antibody is used.

EXPERT OPINION

: MoAbs are increasingly used in haematology practice either alone or in combination with other types of therapy for improved out come in various haematological conditions.

Analytical similarity as base for rituximab biosimilars in lymphoid malignancies in the clinic: a PF-05280586 case study

The availability of biosimilars in oncology has provided an opportunity for increased patient access to biologic therapies. However, healthcare professional perceptions concerning the relatively limited clinical data sufficient to support their regulatory approval may contribute to varied uptake and use. We review key aspects of the development program for the rituximab biosimilar PF-05280586 (Ruxience™) that supported its approval for lymphoid malignancies, to illustrate the rationale for an abbreviated clinical program. In particular, we describe the extensive analytical assessment, comprising sensitive techniques that established similarity with the reference product in key product attributes, underlying structure, function, potency, safety and quality, which formed the foundation for a successful development program, culminating in a confirmatory comparative clinical trial in patients with follicular lymphoma.

Epidemiological features of primary breast lymphoma patients and development of a nomogram to predict survival

BACKGROUND

Studies on the epidemiology and prognosis of primary breast lymphoma (PBL) are lack for low incidence. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of PBL and develop nomograms to predict patient survival.

METHODS

Data of patients who were diagnosed with PBL from 1975 to 2011 and incidence rate of PBL from 1975 to 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Time-varying multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Nomograms were constructed based on the independent prognostic factors identified in multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1427 patients diagnosed with PBL were identified with the average age of 67.1 years. The overall incidence of PBL is 1.35/1,000,000 (adjusted to the United States standard population in 2000) from 1975 to 2017, with a significant upward trend by an annual percentage change (APC) of 2.91 (95%CI 2.29-3.94, P < 0.05). Age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, marital status, histological subtype, Ann Arbor Stage, and treatment modality were assessed as independent prognostic factors for OS and DSS by multivariable Cox regression (P < 0.05). Nomograms were constructed to predict the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10- year OS and DSS. The concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots showed robustness and accuracy of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of PBL was steadily increasing over the past four decades. Nomograms constructed can predicting 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS and identify patients with high-risk PBL.

Rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. The current standard of care is chemoimmunotherapy with an R-CHOP regimen. We aim to review the role of this regimen after two decades of being the standard of care.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review of DLBCL, including the epidemiology, trials defining R-CHOP as the standard of care, as well as dose intensification and dose reduction schemes. Additionally, we briefly review the development of rituximab biosimilars and the addition of targeted drugs to R-CHOP in clinical trials.

Discussion

R-CHOP cures approximately 70% of DLBCL patients. Dose-dense regimens do not show a benefit in response and increase toxicity. Dose reduction, particularly in elderly patients or with comorbidities, may be a treatment option. DLBCL constitutes a group of diseases that activate different biological pathways. Matching specific treatments to a defined genetic alteration is under development. Rituximab biosimilars have become available to a broader population, particularly in developing countries, where access to treatment is limited because of economic resources.

Conclusion

DLBCL landscape is heterogeneous. R-CHOP immunochemotherapy has been a standard of care for two decades and cures approximately 70% of cases. Molecular characterization of patients is evolving and may have critical therapeutic implications.

Indications for Rituximab Use in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a top-selling biologic that was first approved by the FDA in 1997 for a non-Hodgkin lymphoma orphan indication. It has since been approved for additional orphan indications, with rheumatoid arthritis as the only FDA-approved, nonorphan indication. Evidence suggests that rituximab is frequently used off-label, but information on its use over time and indications for use in the United States is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess incident rituximab use over time in an integrated health care delivery system.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Data were collected from administrative databases and manual chart reviews. Patients who received their first rituximab infusion between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017, and who were not a part of a clinical trial were included. Indication for use (FDA-approved orphan/nonorphan, off-label) was determined. Proportions of use were assessed over time. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors associated with receiving rituximab for an FDA-approved indication.

RESULTS

A total of 1,674 patients were included. The majority (66.4%) of patients had an FDA-approved indication, with lymphoma being the most common approved indication (66.4%). The most common indication for off-label use was neurologic conditions (72.7%), predominantly demyelinating diseases. Off-label indication use increased from 1.2% in 2009 to 55.6% in 2017. Factors associated with rituximab use for an FDA-approved indication included increased age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07) and increased burden of chronic disease (chronic disease score: AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.12; Charlson Comorbidity Index score: AOR = 3.52, 95% CI = 3.03-4.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of rituximab grew dramatically over the course of the study. With the recent FDA approval of the rituximab biosimilar and its expected lower price, off-label use will likely continue to rise. Opportunities for cost savings and to ensure appropriate use of these medications should be evaluated.

DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. All authors except Hansen are employed by Kaiser Permanente. Hansen has nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors in May 2019 in Salt Lake City, UT, and at an encore presentation October 2019 at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting in New York, NY.

Real-world use and acceptance of rituximab biosimilars in non-Hodgkin lymphoma in an oncologist network in Germany

Aim: Present real-world data for rituximab (biosimilar and reference)-containing regimens in extrapolated indications in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients & methods: Data collected from office-based oncologic practices in Germany (July 2017–June 2019). Results: Of 1741 patients, 1241 had NHL; 500 had CLL. Of 7595 therapy cycles, 28.3% used reference rituximab; 55.2% used rituximab biosimilars; 2.0% used subcutaneous rituximab; 14.5% used rituximab, not otherwise specified. Rituximab biosimilars were used across all indications; 57.3% of cycles were administered in extrapolated indications. Over 24 months, the proportion of rituximab prescriptions that were for biosimilars increased from 12.0 to 83.0%. Conclusion: Our real-world data in NHL and CLL depicts increasing use of rituximab biosimilars across multiple treatment protocols, including extrapolated indications.