Companion and complementary diagnostics: an important treatment decision tool in precision medicine

Insights into post-marketing clinical validation of companion diagnostics with reference to the FDA, EMA, PMDA, and MFDS

Companion diagnostics are increasing clinical demand globally, regulatory frameworks for clinical validation are strengthening. Post-marketing verification is an important aspect of providing high-quality, personalized treatment to patients because it can ensure long-term safety and effectiveness, while also generating effective risk management and performance evidence. Certain compliance issues related to the requirements for post-marketing clinical trials can potentially impact manufacturers, so it is essential to have a clear understanding of the regulatory process. In this study, we perform an institutional comparison as well as a case analysis by country (U.S. Food & Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, and Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) on the post-marketing safety and effectiveness of companion diagnostics. We collected guidelines and guidance documents published by each regulatory agency and Post-marketing research case analysis examined the data collection items as well as the materials or templates required to be submitted. The results indicate that there are institutional differences in the post-marketing surveillance activities carried out by different regulatory authorities, and the data required may vary accordingly. The findings of this study are expected to provide new insights that can support manufacturers and developers of companion diagnostics in securing evidence regarding post-marketing safety and effectiveness.

Facts and Hopes on Biomarkers for Successful Early Clinical Immunotherapy Trials: Innovative Patient Enrichment Strategies

Despite the clinical validation and unequivocal benefit to patients, the development of cancer immunotherapies is facing some key challenges and the attrition rate in early phases of development remains high. Identifying the appropriate patient population that would benefit most from the drug is on the critical path for successful clinical development. We believe that a systematic implementation of patient enrichment strategies early in the drug development process and trial design, is the basis for an innovative, more efficient, and leaner clinical development to achieve earlier a clear proof of concept or proof of failure. In this position article, we will describe and propose key considerations for the implementation of patient enrichment strategies as an opportunity to provide decision-enabling data earlier in the drug development process. We introduce an innovative multidimensional tool for immuno-oncology drug development that focuses on facilitating the identification and prioritization of enrichment-relevant biomarkers, based on the drug mechanism of action. To illustrate its utility, we discuss patient enrichment examples and use a case in the field of cancer immunotherapy, together with technical and regulatory considerations. Overall, we propose to implement fit for purpose enrichment strategies for all investigational drugs as early as possible in the development process. We believe that this will increase the success rate of immuno-oncology clinical trials, and eventually bring new and better medicines to patients faster.

Alternate Antimicrobial Therapies and Their Companion Tests

New antimicrobial approaches are essential to counter antimicrobial resistance. The drug development pipeline is exhausted with the emergence of resistance, resulting in unsuccessful trials. The lack of an effective drug developed from the conventional drug portfolio has mandated the introspection into the list of potentially effective unconventional alternate antimicrobial molecules. Alternate therapies with clinically explicable forms include monoclonal antibodies, antimicrobial peptides, aptamers, and phages. Clinical diagnostics optimize the drug delivery. In the era of diagnostic-based applications, it is logical to draw diagnostic-based treatment for infectious diseases. Selection criteria of alternate therapeutics in infectious diseases include detection, monitoring of response, and resistance mechanism identification. Integrating these diagnostic applications is disruptive to the traditional therapeutic development. The challenges and mitigation methods need to be noted. Applying the goals of clinical pharmacokinetics that include enhancing efficacy and decreasing toxicity of drug therapy, this review analyses the strong correlation of alternate antimicrobial therapeutics in infectious diseases. The relationship between drug concentration and the resulting effect defined by the pharmacodynamic parameters are also analyzed. This review analyzes the perspectives of aligning diagnostic initiatives with the use of alternate therapeutics, with a particular focus on companion diagnostic applications in infectious diseases.

A Systematic Database Approach to Identify Companion Diagnostic Testing in Clinical Trials under the New In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation

The European Union In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) introduces companion diagnostics (CDx) as a new legal term. CDx are applied in combination with a medicinal product to identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit from a treatment or who are at increased risk. This new regulation came into full effect on 26 May 2022 and represents the current development in personalized medicine. The implementation of IVDR and CDx is a regulatory challenge in the EU, requiring re-assessment of in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD) in terms of their CDx designation. To retrospectively identify IVD biomarker testing applied in clinical trials, a systematic search in the German PharmNet Clinical Trials database was developed. In total 3643 clinical trials conducted between 2004 and 2022 were identified. The results were analyzed in terms of medicinal products, biomarkers, and IVDs. Patient stratification based on biomarker testing mainly takes place in oncology-related trials, and the biomarkers most frequently tested are PD-L1 and HER2. Furthermore, there is a significant overlap between the collected data and non-European national authorities that have already implemented the CDx concept. This analysis could be indicatory of the medicinal products and corresponding IVD tests that could be CDx candidates under the IVDR.

Companion diagnostic requirements for spatial biology using multiplex immunofluorescence and multispectral imaging

Immunohistochemistry has long been held as the gold standard for understanding the expression patterns of therapeutically relevant proteins to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Patient selection for targeted therapy in oncology has successfully relied upon standard microscopy-based methodologies, such as single-marker brightfield chromogenic immunohistochemistry. As promising as these results are, the analysis of one protein, with few exceptions, no longer provides enough information to draw effective conclusions about the probability of treatment response. More multifaceted scientific queries have driven the development of high-throughput and high-order technologies to interrogate biomarker expression patterns and spatial interactions between cell phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment. Such multi-parameter data analysis has been historically reserved for technologies that lack the spatial context that is provided by immunohistochemistry. Over the past decade, technical developments in multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry and discoveries made with improving image data analysis platforms have highlighted the importance of spatial relationships between certain biomarkers in understanding a patient's likelihood to respond to, typically, immune checkpoint inhibitors. At the same time, personalized medicine has instigated changes in both clinical trial design and its conduct in a push to make drug development and cancer treatment more efficient, precise, and economical. Precision medicine in immuno-oncology is being steered by data-driven approaches to gain insight into the tumor and its dynamic interaction with the immune system. This is particularly necessary given the rapid growth in the number of trials involving more than one immune checkpoint drug, and/or using those in combination with conventional cancer treatments. As multiplex methods, like immunofluorescence, push the boundaries of immunohistochemistry, it becomes critical to understand the foundation of this technology and how it can be deployed for use as a regulated test to identify the prospect of response from mono- and combination therapies. To that end, this work will focus on: 1) the scientific, clinical, and economic requirements for developing clinical multiplex immunofluorescence assays; 2) the attributes of the Akoya Phenoptics workflow to support predictive tests, including design principles, verification, and validation needs; 3) regulatory, safety and quality considerations; 4) application of multiplex immunohistochemistry through lab-developed-tests and regulated in vitro diagnostic devices.

Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Context of Use, Qualification, and Roadmap for Clinical Implementation

Background and Objectives: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines a biomarker as a characteristic that is measured as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or responses to an exposure or intervention. Biomarkers may be used in clinical care or as drug development tools (DDTs) in clinical trials. The goal of this review and perspective is to provide insight into the regulatory guidance for the use of biomarkers in clinical trials and clinical care. Materials and Methods: We reviewed FDA guidances relevant to biomarker use in clinical trials and their transition to use in clinical care. We identified instructive examples of these biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease (AD) drug development and their application in clinical practice. Results: For use in clinical trials, biomarkers must have a defined context of use (COU) as a risk/susceptibility, diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, prognostic, pharmacodynamic, or safety biomarker. A four-stage process defines the pathway to establish the regulatory acceptance of the COU for a biomarker including submission of a letter of intent, description of the qualification plan, submission of a full qualification package, and acceptance through a qualification recommendation. Biomarkers used in clinical care may be companion biomarkers, in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs), or laboratory developed tests (LDTs). A five-phase biomarker development process has been proposed to structure the biomarker development process. Conclusions: Biomarkers are increasingly important in drug development and clinical care. Adherence to regulatory guidance for biomarkers used in clinical trials and patient care is required to advance these important drug development and clinical tools.

Companion Diagnostics: State of the Art and New Regulations

Companion diagnostics (CDx) hail promise of improving the drug development process and precision medicine. However, there are various challenges involved in the clinical development and regulation of CDx, which are considered high-risk in vitro diagnostic medical devices given the role they play in therapeutic decision-making and the complications they may introduce with respect to their sensitivity and specificity. The European Union (E.U.) is currently in the process of bringing into effect in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR). The new Regulation is introducing a wide range of stringent requirements for scientific validity, analytical and clinical performance, as well as on post-market surveillance activities throughout the lifetime of in vitro diagnostics (IVD). Compliance with General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs) adopts a risk-based approach, which is also the case for the new classification system. This changing regulatory framework has an impact on all stakeholders involved in the IVD Industry, including Authorized Representatives, Distributors, Importers, Notified Bodies, and Reference Laboratories and is expected to have a significant effect on the development of new CDx.

An update on companion and complementary diagnostic assays for PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC

Introduction: Development within molecular medicine has given us an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of malignant diseases. This understanding has been the key to a development of a number of new effective target-specific drugs, including the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.Areas covered: This review will focus on the clinical validation and utility of the commercially available IHC PD-L1 expression assays linked to the different PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors indicated for treatment of NSCLC. For the discussion of this subject, mainly data from studies where the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have been given as monotherapy will be reported.Expert opinion: Although PD-L1 expression is not the perfect biomarker; the different IHC PD-L1 expression assays have had major impact on the clinical development of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of NSCLC. A number of clinical studies in NSCLC have shown that the efficacy of the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors are positively correlated to the level of PD-L1 expression. Based on studies presented in this review, the recommendation is that monotherapy should mainly be used for treatment of NSCLC patients with a high PD-L1 expression, as defined by the cutoff values for the individual assays linked to the specific PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor.

Protein array-based companion diagnostics in precision medicine

INTRODUCTION

The development of companion diagnostics (CDx) will increase efficacy and cost-benefit markedly, compared to the currently prevailing trial-and-error approach for treatment. Recent improvements in high-throughput protein technology have resulted in large amounts of predictive biomarkers that are potentially useful components of future CDx assays. Current high multiplex protein arrays are suitable for discovery-based approaches, while low-density and more simple arrays are suitable for use in point-of-care facilities.

AREA COVERED

This review discusses the technical platforms available for protein array focused CDx, explains the technical details of the platforms and provide examples of clinical use, ranging from multiplex arrays to low-density clinically applicable arrays. We thereafter highlight recent predictive biomarkers within different disease areas, such as oncology and autoimmune diseases. Lastly, we discuss some of the challenges connected to the implementation of CDx assays as point-of-care tests.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in the field of protein arrays have enabled high-density arrays permitting large biomarker discovery studies, which are beneficial for future CDx assays. The density of protein arrays range from a single protein to proteome-wide arrays, allowing the discovery of protein signatures that may correlate with drug response. Protein arrays will undoubtedly play a key role in future CDx assays.