Cognitive and mood side effects of lower urinary tract medication

The alpha1A antagonist tamsulosin impairs memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval in a novel object recognition task in mice

Tamsulosin is an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. This drug exhibits high affinity for α1A- and α1D-adrenoceptor subtypes, which are also expressed in the brain. While dementia symptoms have been reported after administration of tamsulosin in humans, studies on its effects on the rodent brain are still rare. The present study investigated the effects of tamsulosin (and biperiden, an amnesic drug) on cognitive performance in the object recognition task (ORT). Tamsulosin (0.001-0.01 mg/kg) was orally administrated in mice at three distinct time points: pre-training, post-training and pre-test session. Tamsulosin 0.01 mg/kg impaired object recognition regardless of when it was injected, whereas at lower doses did not affect mouse performance in the ORT. Biperiden also impaired acquisition and consolidation of object recognition in mice. Furthermore, the effects of tamsulosin on locomotion, motivation and anxiety were excluded as potential confounding factors. At all doses tested, tamsulosin did not alter distance moved, time spent exploring objects in the ORT, and anxiety-related behaviors in the elevated plus-maze test. By contrast, diazepam evoked a significant reduction of anxiety-like behaviours. In conclusion, tamsulosin impaired memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval in an object recognition task in mice, thus affecting memory performance in a non-specific phase manner. These findings contribute to our understanding of the potential adverse effects of tamsulosin, and shed light on the role played by α1-adrenoceptors, particularly α1A- subtype, in cognitive processes.

Risks of Dementia After Treatment with an Anticholinergic, Beta-3 Agonist, or Combination of Both for an Overactive Bladder: A Korean National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An overactive bladder (OAB) is primarily managed with behavioural therapy and using anticholinergics and beta-3 agonists. Reports have shown that the use of anticholinergics by OAB patients was associated with an increased risk of new-onset dementia compared with those using beta-3 agonists. This study compares the risks of dementia among patients with an OAB starting on a beta-3 agonist alone, an anticholinergic alone, or a combination treatment.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we studied a nationwide population cohort comprising patients newly diagnosed with an OAB who initiated their OAB medications between 2015 and 2020. The treatment types were categorised as anticholinergics (oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, trospium, fesoterodine, flavoxate, and propiverine) alone, a beta-3 agonist (mirabegron) alone, and combination therapy (an anticholinergic plus the beta-3 agonist). To evaluate the impact of cumulative drug exposure, we quantified the cumulative exposure to solifenacin and mirabegron as cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) using proportional hazards regression analyses, adjusted for factors known to be associated with dementia.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among the study's 3 452 705 patients, 671 974 were new users of a beta-3 agonist alone (19.5%), 1 943 414 new users of anticholinergics alone (56.3%), and 837 317 receiving combination therapy (24.3%). The most common anticholinergic used both alone and as part of a combination treatment was solifenacin (42.9% and 56.3%, respectively). There was an increased risk of dementia between the users of an anticholinergic alone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.213; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.195-1.232) and those taking a combination treatment (aHR = 1.345; 95% CI, 1.323-1.366) compared with the users of beta-3 agonists alone after the adjustment of covariates. However, the incidence of dementia was also significantly higher, with an increase in the cumulative dose of mirabegron (aHR = 1.062 [1.021-1.106] for 28-120 cDDDs and aHR = 1.044 [1.004-1.084)] for patients who received >121 cDDDs compared with those who received <27 cDDDs). A marked increased risk of dementia was associated with the use of solifenacin, tolterodine, fesoterodine, and propiverine, both separately and in combination with mirabegron.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In this large Korean cohort, the use of anticholinergics with or without a beta-3 agonist increased the risk of new-onset dementia compared with the use of a beta-3 agonist alone. Given that the risk of dementia was most significantly elevated with combination treatments, care should be taken when considering combination treatment for OAB patients with risk factors for dementia. Furthermore, there could be a possible association between beta-3 agonists and dementia, although future studies are needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study investigated the risk of dementia induced by overactive bladder (OAB) treatment in a large Korean cohort. Two representative OAB treatment drugs, anticholinergics and beta-3 agonists, both increased the risk of new-onset dementia. Clinicians should be cautious in using OAB treatment drugs since no drugs could be concluded as safe.

Potential side effects of currently available pharmacotherapies in male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

The drug classes of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, 5α-reductase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are guideline-recommended treatments of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia; muscarinic receptor antagonists and β3-adrenoceptor agonists are also recommended if storage symptoms are insufficiently addressed with one of the other three drug classes.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a narrative review (no formalized literature searches performed) of the tolerability of these drug classes with emphasis on the more recently introduced medications, on combination treatment, and on more lately emerging risks.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

The tolerability profiles are distinct between drug classes but, with few exceptions, similar within a drug class. Within a drug, formulations with longer duration of action tend to have better tolerability. Efficacy gains using combination treatment at least partly come at a cost of lesser tolerability. Greater susceptibility to experience adverse events based on age, comorbidities, and comedications appears conceptually important but remains under-investigated in this therapeutic area.

Current and Emerging Pharmacological Targets and Treatments of Urinary Incontinence and Related Disorders

Overactive bladder syndrome with and without urinary incontinence and related conditions, signs, and disorders such as detrusor overactivity, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, underactive bladder, stress urinary incontinence, and nocturia are common in the general population and have a major impact on the quality of life of the affected patients and their partners. Based on the deliberations of the subcommittee on pharmacological treatments of the 7th International Consultation on Incontinence, we present a comprehensive review of established drug targets in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome and the aforementioned related conditions and the approved drugs used in its treatment. Investigational drug targets and compounds are also reviewed. We conclude that, despite a range of available medical treatment options, a considerable medical need continues to exist. This is largely because the existing treatments are symptomatic and have limited efficacy and/or tolerability, which leads to poor long-term adherence. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Urinary incontinence and related disorders are prevalent in the general population. While many treatments have been approved, few patients stay on long-term treatment despite none of them being curative. This paper provides a comprehensive discussion of existing and emerging treatment options for various types of incontinence and related disorders.

[Short version of the S2k guideline on drug therapy of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD)]

BACKGROUND

In Germany about one million patients suffer from neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). If left untreated, various forms of NLUTD can lead to secondary damage of the lower and upper urinary tract. Thus, the guideline was developed for the drug therapy of patients with NLUTD, who frequently require lifelong care and aftercare.

METHODS

The guideline was developed in a consensus process with several meetings and online reviews, and final recommendations were decided on in online consensus meetings. Ballots were sent to elected officials of the contributing professional societies. Level of consensus was given for each coordinated recommendation ( https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/043-053.html ). RESULTS/MOST IMPORTANT RECOMMENDATIONS: (Video)urodynamic classification of the NLUTD should be conducted before the use of antimuscarinic drugs (84.2%). Approved oral antimuscarinics should be used as first choice. Contraindications must be respected (100%). If oral treatment is ineffective or in the case of adverse drug reaction (ADRs) alternatively instillation of oxybutynin solution intravesically (83%) or onabotulinumneurotoxine (OBoNT) injection should be offered (89.5%). In case of failure or ADRs of antimuscarinics, β3 sympathomimetic mirabegron can be used to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) (off-label use) (100%). In case of paraplegia below C8 or multiple sclerosis with an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of ≤ 6.5, OBoNT injection can be offered as an alternative (89.5%). Drug therapy for NDO should be started early in newborns/young children (84.2%). Conservative, nondrug therapy should be considered in frail elderly (94.7%). No parasympathomimetic therapy should be used to treat neurogenic detrusor underactivity (94.7%).

CONCLUSION

Precise knowledge of the neurological underlying disease/sequence of trauma and the exact classification of the NLUTD are required for development of individualized therapy.

[Medical treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms: what's new?]

Decades after the introduction of 5α-reductase inhibitors and α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, new data of practical relevance related to their desired and adverse effects continues to emerge. Some of these novel findings are to be taken seriously but are insufficiently established, for instance associations between drug use and depression or dementia. Multiple combination treatments have been tested. While combination treatment was often statistically superior to monotherapy, the difference was mostly in the range of 1 IPSS point, which raises doubts on the clinical relevance of the findings at the group level. The new evidence enables further personalisation of the treatment of male lower urinary tract dysfunction, but also makes individual risk-benefit considerations more complex.

Depression risk associated with the use of 5α-reductase inhibitors versus α-blockers: A retrospective cohort study in South Korea

Background

One of the most prescribed treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARI). Europe experienced recent safety issues involving 5ARI and depression symptoms, with similar findings being seen in Western countries. The South Korea has updated the drug label in accordance with European recommendations, but the relevant evidence was insufficient. This study compared the use of 5ARI versus α-blocker (AB) as a treatment for BPH and related risks of depression to provide evidence based on the Korean population.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using South Korea’s Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service claim data from 2011 to 2017. New patients diagnosed in men with BPH and taking medications that contained either 5ARI or AB between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2015, were included (n = 1,461 5ARI; n = 18,650 AB). The primary outcome was depression defined per the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10: F32-34, F38, F412, F432). Logistic regression was used to implement 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching of patients taking 5ARI to those taking AB to adjust for confounding. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of depression associated with 5ARI versus AB.

Results

Balance in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups were achieved within PS matched pairs (1,461 pairs). Compared to the AB medication group, the 5ARI group had lower depression (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: [0.51–0.92]). However, we could not find a clinically relevant, statistical difference after PS matching (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: [0.61–1.36]).

Conclusions

The risk of depression associated with 5ARI was not meaningfully different from AB in Korea, which suggests that medical officials should provide the most appropriate medication for BPH patients by considering both treatment benefits and depression risk.

Treatment of Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the main classes of drugs used at reducing morbidity related to ureteric stents.

SUMMARY

After establishing a priori protocol, a systematic electronic literature search was conducted in July 2019. The randomized clinical trials (RCTs) selection proceeded in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered (PROSPERO ID 178130). The risk of bias and the quality assessment of the included RCTs were performed. Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL) were pooled for meta-analysis. Mean difference and risk difference were calculated as appropriate for each outcome to determine the cumulative effect size. Fourteen RCTs were included in the analysis accounting for 2,842 patients. Alpha antagonist, antimuscarinic, and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors significatively reduced all indexes of the USSQ, the IPSS and QoL scores relative to placebo. Conversely, combination therapy (alpha antagonist plus antimuscarinic) showed in all indexes of the USSQ, IPSS, and QoL over alpha antagonist or antimuscarinic alone. On comparison with alpha blockers, PDE inhibitors were found to be equally effective for urinary symptoms, general health, and body pain parameters, but sexual health parameters improved significantly with PDE inhibitors. Finally, antimuscarinic resulted in higher decrease in all indexes of the USSQ, the IPSS, and QoL relative to alpha antagonist.

KEY MESSAGE

Relative to placebo, alpha antagonist alone, antimuscarinics alone, and PDE inhibitors alone have beneficial effect in reducing stent-related symptoms. Furthermore, there are significant advantages of combination therapy compared with monotherapy. Finally, PDE inhibitors are comparable to alpha antagonist, and antimuscarinic seems to be more effective than alpha antagonist alone.

The connection of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors to the development of depression

Recent literature connects 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) with neuropsychiatric adverse effects. Several clinical studies have indicated that former 5-ARIs users had a higher incidence of depressive symptoms and neuropsychiatric side effects than non-users. However, the underlying mechanisms involved in the depression in former 5-ARIs patients, a condition known as "post finasteride syndrome (PFS)", are not thoroughly understood. This review aims to summarize and discuss the association between 5-ARIs and depression as well as possible mechanisms. We used PubMed search terms including "depression", "depressive symptoms", "MDD", "anxiety", or "suicidal idea", and "5-alpha reductase inhibitors", "finasteride", "dutasteride", "5-ARIs". All relevant articles from in vivo and clinical studies from 2002 to 2021 were carefully reviewed. Any contradictory findings were included and debated. The potential mechanisms that link 5-ARIs and depression include alteration in neuroactive steroids, dopaminergic dysfunction, reduced hippocampal neurogenesis, increased neuroinflammation, alteration of the HPA axis, and epigenetic modifications. From this review, we hope to provide information for future studies based on animal experiments, and potential therapeutic strategies for depressive patients with PFS.

Impact of early vs. delayed initiation of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery in LUTS/BPH patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms at risk of disease progression

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of delayed start of combination therapy (CT) with dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg on the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery (AUR/S) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at risk of disease progression.

Methods

Using a time-to-event model based on pooled data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials, clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed to assess the risk of AUR/S up to 48 months in moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH patients following immediate and delayed start of CT for those not responding to tamsulosin monotherapy. Simulation scenarios (1300 subjects/arm) were investigated, including immediate start (reference) and alternative delayed start (six scenarios 1–24 months). AUR/S incidence was described by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and analysed using log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events as well as the relative and attributable risks were summarised stratified by treatment.

Results

Survival curves for patients starting CT at month 1 and 3 did not differ from those who initiated CT immediately. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed when switch to CT occurs ≥ 6 months from the initial treatment. At month 48, AUR/S incidence was 4.6% vs 9.5%, 11.0% and 11.3% in patients receiving immediate CT vs. switchers after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Start of CT before month 6 appears to significantly reduce the risk of AUR/S compared with delayed start by ≥ 6 months. This has implications for the treatment algorithm for men with LUTS/BPH at risk of disease progression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03517-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Managing Nocturia in Frail Older Adults

This review discusses the available evidence in the current evaluation and treatment of nocturia in frail older adults. No evidence specifically evaluates the use of behavioral interventions in the treatment of the frail older adult with nocturia, but their use is supported in other cohorts. Behavioral modifications and optimal management of comorbidities remain the first-line treatment for all age groups and should be emphasized in the frail due to their favorable safety profile. No studies specific to the frail older adult support the use of pharmacotherapy. Some evidence exists for the efficacy of several agents in the older adult; however, this is difficult to extrapolate to the frail, and safety concerns abound. Desmopressin may be effective in the older adult, but a high risk of hyponatremia raises concerns for its safety, and therefore it is not recommended in the frail. α-Antagonists may have limited efficacy in men with known benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); they are relatively well tolerated, although the risk of orthostatic hypotension in the frail should be considered. β3-agonist trials suggest limited clinical utility. Antimuscarinics are not found to be useful in this cohort and are contraindicated in the frail older adult given the ability of antimuscarinics to cause cognitive impairment, delirium, and falls. No data examine the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the frail older adult. Additionally, the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria recommends against the use of muscarinics in those over the age of 75 years and therefore their use is not supported.

Cognitive Function and Urologic Medications for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Special considerations should be made when selecting medications for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in older patients especially those over 65 years old. This review summarizes the relationship between current treatments for LUTS and cognitive impairment. Although the recently reported association between dementia and tamsulosin is debatable, the effects of α-blockers and pharmacokinetics are not reported in this context. Five-alpha reductase inhibitors appear to affect mood. However, the association between the development of dementia and cognitive impairment is unlikely. Anticholinergic agents, other than trospium, fesoterodine, and imdafenacin have a relatively high distribution in the central nervous system. In particular, oxybutynin is reported to cause cognitive impairment. Several animal studies on the blood-brain barrier permeability of oxybutynin support this. Therefore, care must be taken when they are used in older patients (65 years and older). Beta-3 agonists are an alternative to, or may be used in combination with, anticholinergic drugs for patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). Several phase 2 and 3 clinical studies report high tolerability and efficacy, making them relatively safe for OAB treatment. However, there is a possibility that cognitive function may be affected; thus, long-term study data are required. We have reviewed studies investigating the correlation of urologic medications with cognitive dysfunction and have provided an overview of drug selection, as well as other considerations in older patients (65 years and older) with LUTS. This narrative review has focused primarily on articles indexed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase databases. No formal search strategy was used, and no meta-analysis of data was performed.

Molecular basis of mood and cognitive adverse events elucidated via a combination of pharmacovigilance data mining and functional enrichment analysis

Drug-induced Mood- and Cognition-related adverse events (MCAEs) are often only detected during the clinical trial phases of drug development, or even after marketing, thus posing a major safety concern and a challenge for both pharmaceutical companies and clinicians. To fill some gaps in the understanding and elucidate potential biological mechanisms of action frequently associated with MCAEs, we present a unique workflow linking observational population data with the available knowledge at molecular, cellular, and psychopharmacology levels. It is based on statistical analysis of pharmacovigilance reports and subsequent signaling pathway analyses, followed by evidence-based expert manual curation of the outcomes. Our analysis: (a) ranked pharmaceuticals with high occurrence of such adverse events (AEs), based on disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and (b) identified 120 associated genes and common pathway nodes possibly underlying MCAEs. Nearly two-thirds of the identified genes were related to immune modulation, which supports the critical involvement of immune cells and their responses in the regulation of the central nervous system function. This finding also means that pharmaceuticals with a negligible central nervous system exposure may induce MCAEs through dysregulation of the peripheral immune system. Knowledge gained through this workflow unravels putative hallmark biological targets and mediators of drug-induced mood and cognitive disorders that need to be further assessed and validated in experimental models. Thereafter, they can be used to substantially improve in silico/in vitro/in vivo tools for predicting these adversities at a preclinical stage.