Lethal Congenital Malformations in Fetuses-Antenatal Ultrasound or Perinatal Autopsy

Maternal human papillomavirus infection and the risk of congenital malformations: A nationwide population-based cohort study

Previous research has explored theories regarding the vertical transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and its association with adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. However, the impact of maternal HPV infection on congenital anomalies (CAs) in offspring remains relatively understudied. We conducted a population-based cohort study linking the Taiwan Birth Registry, Taiwan Death Registry, and National Health Insurance Research Database, in which newborns born in Taiwan between 2009 and 2015 were included. We established a maternal HPV infection cohort comprising 37 807 newborns and matched them with a comparison group of 151 228 newborns at a 1:4 ratio based on index year, age, and sex. The study examined a composite outcome and subgroups of different types of congenital malformations. Differences in cumulative incidence of CAs were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regressions. No significant association was found between HPV infection and the broad spectrum of CAs (aHR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.10; log-rank test p = 0.14). However, we observed a 19% increased risk of musculoskeletal CAs in the maternal HPV infection group (aHR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.05-1.34) compared to those without maternal HPV exposure. Other factors, including the type of HPV (aHR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.16-2.63), the timing of exposure (during or before pregnancy), and maternal age (aHR for <30 years: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94-1.1; aHR for 30-39 years: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.99-1.11; aHR for ≥40 years: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.17), did not significantly affect the risk for any CA. In conclusion, gestation detection of HPV infection was associated with musculoskeletal CAs but not other major CAs. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the necessity of prenatal screening in populations at risk.

Disparities Between Prenatal Ultrasound and Autopsy Findings in Pregnancies Resulting in Fetal Loss

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study aimed to assess disparities between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies that resulted in fetal loss, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound using postmortem examinations as a gold standard.

METHODS

Our study included 136 autopsy cases following a fetal loss that occurred at our tertiary medical center for 8 years. A comparison between the prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings was made, and all cases were classified according to the degree of agreement. The diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound was calculated at the level of organ system and specific malformations.

RESULTS

The primary sonographic diagnosis was confirmed in 91.9% of the cases (n = 125). General agreement was highest among central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems (85.7%, n = 36, 18, and 12, respectively) and lowest among facial, multiple anomalies, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (50.0%, 74.3%, 78.6%, and 80.0%, n = 2, 26, 11, and 4, respectively). The sensitivity of ultrasound was highest in the CNS (93.2%) and musculoskeletal (87.0%) and lowest in the facial (32.3%) and pulmonary (13.0%) systems. Specifically, low diagnostic rates were noted in detecting ventriculomegaly, valvular anomalies, renal dysplasia, spleen and adrenal anomalies, and digital and facial defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study observed an overall high agreement between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy while contributing to our comprehensive understanding of its strengths and limitations across various types of organ systems and specific malformations.

Are non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy techniques for detecting cause of death in prenates, neonates and infants accurate? A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy techniques in deaths under 1 year of age.

DESIGN

This is a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO.

PARTICIPANTS

Deaths from conception to one adjusted year of age.

SEARCH METHODS

MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), the Cochrane Library, Scopus and grey literature sources were searched from inception to November 2021.

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

Non-invasive or minimally invasive diagnostic tests as an alternative to traditional autopsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were included if participants were under one adjusted year of age, with index tests conducted prior to the reference standard.Data were extracted from eligible studies using piloted forms. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. A narrative synthesis was conducted following the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis guidelines. Vote counting was used to assess the direction of effect.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Direction of effect was expressed as percentage of patients per study.

FINDINGS

We included 54 direct evidence studies (68 articles/trials), encompassing 3268 cases and eight index tests. The direction of effect was positive for postmortem ultrasound and antenatal echography, although with varying levels of success. Conversely, the direction of effect was against virtual autopsy. For the remaining tests, the direction of effect was inconclusive.A further 134 indirect evidence studies (135 articles/trials) were included, encompassing 6242 perinatal cases. The addition of these results had minimal impact on the direct findings yet did reveal other techniques, which may be favourable alternatives to autopsy.Seven trial registrations were included but yielded no results.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is insufficient to make firm conclusions about the generalised use of non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy techniques in relation to all perinatal population groups.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021223254.

Comparison of prenatal central nervous system abnormalities with postmortem findings in fetuses following termination of pregnancy and clinical utility of postmortem examination

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to compare prenatal ultrasound (USG) and postmortem examination findings of central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities in fetuses following termination of pregnancy (TOP).

METHODS

A total of 190 fetuses with USG-confirmed fetal CNS abnormalities of terminated pregnancies between January 2001 and January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed and USG and postmortem examination findings were compared.

RESULTS

The most frequent CNS abnormalities were acrania/anencephaly (n=45, 24%), spina bifida (n=43, 23%), and ventriculomegaly (n=35, 18%). In 144 of the 190 (76%) cases, there was total agreement between USG and postmortem examination diagnosis. Postmortem examination provided minor findings which did not change the major clinical diagnosis in two (1%) cases with spina bifida and ventriculomegaly. In six (3%) cases, the diagnosis changed after postmortem examination. In 25 of the 190 (13%) cases with multiple abnormalities as evidenced by USG, CNS abnormality was unable to be confirmed at postmortem examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results show an overall high agreement (76%) between USG and postmortem examination findings for CNS malformations. Due to autolysis and fluid structure, USG-confirmed CNS diagnosis cannot be always confirmed by postmortem examination. This potential discrepancy should be explained to patients before considering TOP. Postmortem examination is the gold standard to confirm prenatal diagnosis.

A Comparative Prevalence of Birth Defects between Newborns of Immigrant and Native-Born Mothers in Taiwan: Ten Years of Population-Based Data

In recent years, newborns born to immigrant mothers have accounted for about 10% of the total births in Taiwan. However, little is known about whether there are differences between newborns of immigrant and native-born mothers regarding the prevalence and the possible causes of birth defects. By combining four nationwide databases and assessing all newborns between 2005 and 2014 in Taiwan as research subjects, this study determined the prevalence of birth defects stratified into nine categories (neuronal, facial, cleft, circulatory, respiratory, digestive, urogenital, musculoskeletal and chromosomal abnormalities) in the newborns of immigrant mothers and native-born mothers. We found that the prevalence of any birth defects in newborns of immigrant mothers (ranging from 0.98 to 1.24%) was lower than that of native-born mothers (2.86%). Skeletomuscular system defects are the most common among newborns of women from the main immigrant countries (0.24–0.42%), while circulatory system defects were the most common among newborns of Taiwanese women (0.92%). The risks of all defects remained lower for newborns of immigrant mothers (AORs ranged from 0.37 to 0.47) after controlling for possible confounding variables. The higher rates of birth defects among newborns of native-born mothers may be attributed to an older maternal age at childbirth and a higher prevalence of diabetes than that of immigrant mothers. The findings from this study imply that the prevalence of birth defects between newborns of immigrant and native-born mothers is not similar, as evidenced by a decade of population-based data.

Second-trimester fetal autopsy: A morphological study with prenatal USG correlations and clinical implications

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this study is to analyze the second-trimester fetal autopsies and to reemphasize the role of autopsy by comparing autopsy findings with prenatal ultrasound observations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of second-trimester fetal autopsies over a period of 7.5 years (January 2009–June 2016). A standard protocol of autopsy procedure was followed, which included external examination with photography, X-ray, internal examination, and histopathological examination. In fetuses with congenital malformations (CMs), the findings of prenatal ultrasonogram and autopsy examination were compared.

RESULTS:

We analyzed a total of 66 fetuses, which includes 17 intrauterine fetal death, 49 terminations for CM, and increased risk for chromosomal abnormality. In fetuses with CM, multiple anomalies were more common than a single anomaly. The most common anomalies were seen involving central nervous system (neural tube defect) followed by the genitourinary system. Autopsy confirmed prenatal ultrasound findings in all cases except three. Complete agreement between USG findings and autopsy were seen in 17 cases (39.7%). Additional findings on autopsy were noted in 25 cases (62.2%). Among these, 15 cases had a significant change of recurrence risk due to altered initial ultrasound diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

Fetal autopsy plays an important role in arriving at the final diagnosis and detecting the cause of death. This information is very essential for the clinicians, in genetic counseling of the parents, and management of future pregnancies.

No. 365-Fetal and Perinatal Autopsy in Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Abnormalities with Normal Chromosome Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the information on fetal and perinatal autopsies, the process of obtaining consent, and the alternative information-gathering options following a prenatal diagnosis of non-chromosomal anomalies in order to assist health care providers in providing postnatal counselling regarding diagnosis and potential recurrence risks.

OUTCOMES

To provide better counselling about fetal and perinatal autopsies for women and families who are dealing with a prenatally diagnosed non-chromosomal fetal anomaly.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2010, 2011, and 2017, using appropriate key words (fetal autopsy postmortem, autopsy, perinatal postmortem examination, autopsy protocol, postmortem magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy consent, tissue retention, autopsy evaluation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This update educates readers about (1) the benefits of a fetal perinatal autopsy, (2) the consent process, and (3) the alternatives when the family declines autopsy. It also highlights the need for a standardized approach to fetal and perinatal autopsies, emphasizing pertinent additional sampling when indicated. The authors recognize that there is variability across Canada in access to the cited services and resources. As such, these recommendations were developed in an attempt to promote access and to provide a minimum standard for all provinces and territories across the country.

VALUES

The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table).

RECOMMENDATIONS

N° 365 -Autopsies fœtales et périnatales en cas d'anomalies fœtales diagnostiquées avant la naissance avec une analyse chromosomique normale

OBJECTIF

Examiner les données sur les autopsies fœtales et périnatales, le processus de consentement et les options de collecte de renseignements à la suite d'un diagnostic prénatal d'anomalies non chromosomiques afin d'aider les fournisseurs de soins à offrir du conseil postnatal au sujet du diagnostic et des éventuels risques de récurrence. RéSULTATS: Offrir de meilleurs conseils sur les autopsies fœtales et périnatales aux femmes et aux familles qui ont reçu un diagnostic prénatal d'anomalie fœtale non chromosomique. ÉVIDENCE: Nous avons examiné des études publiées récupérées au moyen de recherches dans PubMed, Medline, CINAHL et la Bibliothèque Cochrane en 2010, en 2011 et en 2017 à l'aide de mots-clés appropriés (« fetal autopsy postmortem », « autopsy », « perinatal postmortem examination », « autopsy protocol », « postmortem magnetic resonance imaging », « autopsy consent », « tissue retention » et « autopsy evaluation »). Nous n'avons tenu compte que des résultats provenant de revues systématiques, d'essais cliniques, randomisés ou non, et d'études observationnelles. D'autres publications ont été repérées dans les bibliographies de ces articles. Aucune restriction de date ou de langue n'a été employée. Nous avons également tenu compte de la littérature grise (non publiée) trouvée sur les sites Web d'organismes d'évaluation des technologies de la santé et d'autres organismes liés aux technologies de la santé, dans des collections de directives cliniques et dans des registres d'essais cliniques, et obtenue auprès d'associations nationales et internationales de médecins spécialistes. AVANTAGES, DéSAVANTAGES ET COUTS: La présente mise à jour renseigne les lecteurs sur : 1) les avantages de l'autopsie fœtale ou périnatale; 2) le processus de consentement; et 3) les autres options offertes aux familles qui refusent l'autopsie. Elle met également en évidence la nécessité d'adopter une démarche normalisée pour la réalisation des autopsies fœtales et périnatales, et met l'accent sur les prélèvements additionnels qui peuvent être pertinents. Les auteurs sont conscients que l'accès aux ressources et aux services mentionnés varie d'un endroit l'autre au Canada; les recommandations formulées ont donc pour but de promouvoir l'accès et de fournir une norme minimale aux provinces et aux territoires du pays.

VALEURS

La qualité des données a été évaluée au moyen des critères énoncés dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (tableau). RECOMMANDATIONS.