The standard treatment protocol for paracetamol poisoning may be inadequate following overdose with modified release formulation: a pharmacokinetic and clinical analysis of 53 cases

Has the rescheduling of modified-release paracetamol in Australia affected the frequency of overdoses?

OBJECTIVES

In June 2020, modified-release paracetamol (paracetamol-MR) preparations were up-scheduled from schedule-2 (available in pharmacy) to schedule-3 (available by request to a pharmacist only). The present study aims to ascertain whether up-scheduling affected the frequency of paracetamol-MR overdoses.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of two data sets from 1 June 2017 to 31 May 2022. Monash Health data were extracted using the diagnosis of paracetamol overdose coding and electronic medical records data. Calls regarding paracetamol-MR overdoses to Victorian Poisons Information Centre (VPIC) were extracted from the Poisons centre call database. We used a quasi-experimental research design with interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the immediate impact and change in trend of poisoning-related calls and ED presentations before and after June 2020. The change in proportion of paracetamol-MR cases in both databases was analysed using the Χ2 test.

RESULTS

The proportion of paracetamol-MR cases in both data sets did not change. From Monash Health, there was no level change in monthly paracetamol-MR overdose-related presentations following re-scheduling (rate ratio [RR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57-2.01). There was no change in monthly paracetamol-MR overdose-related calls to VPIC following re-scheduling (RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.96-1.14).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of paracetamol-MR overdoses did not decrease after the up-scheduling to S3. Similarly, the frequency of overdoses by month remained similar. Further limitations on access to paracetamol products may need to be considered.

Management of Acetaminophen Poisoning in the US and Canada: A Consensus Statement

Importance

The US and Canada currently have no formal published nationwide guidelines for specialists in poison information or emergency departments for the management of acetaminophen poisoning, resulting in significant variability in management.

Objective

To develop consensus guidelines for the management of acetaminophen poisoning in the US and Canada.

Evidence Review

Four clinical toxicology societies (America's Poison Centers, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, American College of Medical Toxicology, and Canadian Association of Poison Control Centers) selected participants (n = 21). Led by a nonvoting chairperson using a modified Delphi method, the panel created a decision framework and determined the appropriate clinical management of a patient with acetaminophen poisoning. Unique to this effort was the collection of guidelines from most poison centers in addition to systematic collection and review of the medical literature. Comments from review by external organizations were incorporated before the guideline was finalized. The project began in March 2021 and ended in March 2023.

Findings

The search retrieved 84 guidelines and 278 publications. The panel developed guidelines for emergency department management of single or repeated ingestion of acetaminophen. In addition, the panel addressed extended-release formulation, high-risk ingestion, coingestion of anticholinergics or opioids, age younger than 6 years, pregnancy, weight greater than 100 kg, and intravenous acetaminophen use. Differences from current US practice include defining acute ingestion as an ingestion presentation from 4 to 24 hours after overdose was initiated. A revised form of the Rumack-Matthew nomogram was developed. The term massive ingestion was replaced with the term high-risk ingestion and denoted by a specific nomogram line. Other recommendations include specific criteria for emergency department triage, laboratory evaluation and monitoring parameters, defining the role of gastrointestinal decontamination, detailed management of acetylcysteine treatment, associated adverse effects, and stopping criteria for acetylcysteine treatment, as well as criteria for consultation with a clinical toxicologist. Finally, specific treatment considerations, including acetylcysteine dosing, fomepizole administration, and considerations for extracorporeal elimination and transplant evaluation, were addressed.

Conclusions and Relevance

This qualitative study provides a consensus statement on consistent evidence-based recommendations for medical, pharmacy, and nursing education and practice to optimize care of patients with acetaminophen poisoning.

Acetaminophen toxicity and overdose: current understanding and future directions for NAC dosing regimens

INTRODUCTION

Although N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) has long been used for the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning/overdose, the optimal NAC dosing regimen for varying patterns or severity of the poisoning/overdose is still unknown.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant literature was searched for in the MEDLINE (from 1964 until August 31^st, 2022), SCOPUS (from 2004 until August 31^st, 2022) and GOOGLE SCHOLAR (from 2004 until August 31^st, 2022) databases, without restriction in terms of publication date. The inclusion criteria were: original clinical studies reporting results, and studies investigating efficacy and safety of NAC dosing regimens in case(s) of overdose or poisoning with acetaminophen.

EXPERT OPINION

For a more effective treatment of acetaminophen poisoning in the future, it will be crucial to advance the technology of measuring acetaminophen, its metabolites and NAC in the serum, preferably with the point-of-care technique, so that in real time it can be continuously assessed whether it is necessary to administer NAC, and further to increase the dose of NAC and extend the duration of its administration, or not.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of acetaminophen overdose with immediate release, extended release and modified release formulations

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of delayed release formulations of acetaminophen (APAP) has created concern about the role of formulation in overdose. We examined the APAP overdose pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles to assess the role of dose, coingestants and formulation: immediate release (IR), extended release (ER), and modified release (MR) on APAP pharmacokinetic measures.

METHODS

We collected by-subject APAP PK data: subject description, timed blood APAP concentrations, dose, and coingestants. We sought both overdose and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for supratherapeutic doses involving ER or MR formulations. Data analysis and simulation used the non-linear mixed-effects modeling program NONMEM-version 7.4.

RESULTS

The final dataset comprised 3,033 [APAP] from 356 subjects and 15 sources including 3 RCTs (179 subjects receiving IR, 122 ER, 65 MR). The final population PK (PopPK) model was a linear 2-compartment model with first-order (oral) absorption. Covariate relationships included: APAP absorption rate and bioavailability decreased with increased oral dose (p < 0.00005) for all 3 formulations (MR > ER > IR). Post hoc analyses showed opioid coingestant increased exposure (area under the curve, AUC) by factor of 1.6. Simulations of 100 g vs 10 g doses for IR, ER and MR showed overdose of the ER formulation exhibits slower absorption and lower C_max, overall exposure (AUC) is less than 80% of an equivalent dose of IR acetaminophen. The overall exposure for the MR formulation is less than 70% of an equivalent dose of IR.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetaminophen ER and MR formulations have slower absorption and decreased bioavailability leading to a lower C_max and later T_max than the IR formulation. These results have potential clinical implications because delayed absorption could confound use of the Rumack-Matthew nomogram by underestimating the severity of ingestion early in the course of treatment.

Acetaminophen Poisoning

Acetaminophen is a common medication taken in deliberate self-poisoning and unintentional overdose. It is the commonest cause of severe acute liver injury in Western countries. The optimal management of most acetaminophen poisonings is usually straightforward. Patients who present early should be offered activated charcoal and those at risk of acute liver injury should receive acetylcysteine. This approach ensures survival in most. The acetaminophen nomogram is used to assess the need for treatment in acute immediate-release overdoses with a known time of ingestion. However, scenarios that require different management pathways include modified-release, large/massive, and repeated supratherapeutic ingestions.

Population pharmacokinetics of immediate-release and modified-release paracetamol and its major metabolites in a supratherapeutic dosing study

OBJECTIVES

Overdose with paracetamol modified-release (MR) formulation, a bilayer tablet containing 69% slow-release component, has been increasing since its introduction to the market. However, little evidence exists for the management of MR paracetamol overdose. We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for immediate-release (IR) and MR paracetamol and its major metabolism, and quantitatively understand the formulation difference in toxicity assessment based on the nomogram line.

METHODS

Data from a cross-over study design in nine healthy volunteers administered a single supratherapeutic oral dose (80 mg/kg) of either IR and MR paracetamol were available from a published study. Plasma concentrations for paracetamol and its metabolites glucuronide (APAPG) and sulfate conjugate (APAPS) for both formulations were measured and analysed with population pharmacokinetic (PK) method using NONMEM. Toxicity in both formulations was assessed by comparing the simulated paracetamol concentrations under different paracetamol dose levels with the 150 mg/L nomograms. The difference in the assessment was compared between the two formulations.

RESULTS

Paracetamol concentrations for the IR formulation were described with a two-compartment model with first-order input and a lag time. The delayed time-course of MR paracetamol concentrations was best captured by a parallel absorption model in which the slow-release component was a serial zero-order then the first-order process. The formation of APAPG was linear, while APAPS concentrations were best fitted by a Michaelis-Menten process. The relative bioavailability of MR paracetamol compared to IR (FMR/IR) was estimated as 0.81. The simulated probability of making different toxicity assessments based on nomogram line was increased with dose levels and was as high as 14.6% after 22 g IR or MR paracetamol ingested.

CONCLUSIONS

A joint parent-metabolite model to describe time-course profiles of both IR and MR paracetamol and its metabolites APAPG and APAPS concentrations was developed. Simulations from the model showed that toxicity assessment based on the 150 mg/L nomograms is not suitable in MR paracetamol overdoses.

The potential protective role of folic acid against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats

Folic acid (FA), is a group B vitamin, has high reactive oxygen radicals quenching ability, resulting in protection against oxidative damage in aerobic cell. Acetaminophen (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol, APAP) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and can promote oxidative damage in liver and kidney tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate whether folic acid has protective effects on oxidative liver and kidney injury caused by experimental APAP toxication. Forty female Sprague dawley rats were divided into 5 groups; control, APAP, FA, APAP+FA, and APAP+N-acetylcysteine (NAC) groups. APAP toxication was induced by oral gavage (3 g/kg bodyweight). FA (20 mg/kg bodyweight) and NAC (150 mg/kg bodyweight) were given by oral gavage to the specified groups. Oxidant and antioxidant parameter were determined in liver and kidney tissues. In addition, the liver and kidney tissues were histological evaluated. When compared with APAP group, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities and glutathione levels were statistically higher, malondialdehyde (MDA) level and myeloperoxidase activity (except liver tissue) were statistically lower in both APAP+FA and APAP+NAC. Liver and kidney MDA level and kidney SOD activity were significantly lower in APAP+NAC group compared with APAP+FA group. Co-administration of NAC with APAP was found to provide protection, but hepatic cords were defective in some places and some glomerular tubules also had dilatation. Necrotic areas was reduced in the liver and the glomerular structure was in good condition in the APAP+FA group. As a result, FA might have a protective effect against APAP-induced hepato-nephrotoxicity and oxidative stress in rat.

Towards standardisation of evidence-based clinical care process specifications

There is a strong push towards standardisation of treatment approaches, care processes and documentation of clinical practice. However, confusion persists regarding terminology and description of many clinical care process specifications which this research seeks to resolve by developing a taxonomic characterisation of clinical care process specifications. Literature on clinical care process specifications was analysed, creating the starting point for identifying common characteristics and how each is constructed and used in the clinical setting. A taxonomy for clinical care process specifications is presented. The De Bleser approach to limited clinical care process specifications characterisation was extended and each clinical care process specification is successfully characterised in terms of purpose, core elements and relationship to the other clinical care process specification types. A case study on the diagnosis and treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom was used to evaluate the taxonomy and demonstrate how the characterisation framework applies. Standardising clinical care process specifications ensures that the format and content are consistent with expectations, can be read more quickly and high-quality information can be recorded about the patient. Standardisation also enables computer interpretability, which is important in integrating Learning Health Systems into the modern clinical environment. The approach presented allows terminologies for clinical care process specifications that were widely used interchangeably to be easily distinguished, thus, eliminating the existing confusion.

The Effect of 4-Methylpyrazole on Oxidative Metabolism of Acetaminophen in Human Volunteers

INTRODUCTION

Acetaminophen (APAP) is commonly ingested in both accidental and suicidal overdose. Oxidative metabolism by cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) produces the hepatotoxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine. CYP2E1 inhibition using 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP) has been shown to prevent APAP-induced liver injury in mice and human hepatocytes. This study was conducted to assess the effect of 4-MP on APAP metabolism in humans.

METHODS

This crossover trial examined the ability of 4-MP to inhibit CYP2E1 metabolism of APAP in five human volunteers. Participants received a single oral dose of APAP 80 mg/kg, both with and without intravenous 4-MP, after which urinary and plasma oxidative APAP metabolites were measured. The primary outcome was the fraction of ingested APAP excreted as total oxidative metabolites (APAP-CYS, APAP-NAC, APAP-GSH).

RESULTS

Compared with APAP alone, co-treatment with 4-MP decreased the percentage of ingested APAP recovered as oxidative metabolites in 24-hour urine from 4.48 to 0.51% (95% CI = 2.31-5.63%, p = 0.003). Plasma concentrations of these oxidative metabolites also decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show 4-MP effectively reduced oxidative metabolism of APAP in human volunteers ingesting a supratherapeutic APAP dose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03878693.