Pharmacodynamic assessment of vedolizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in Crohn's disease with prior anti-tumor necrosis factor failure: an updated meta-analysis

Ustekinumab and vedolizumab are key treatment options for Crohn's disease patients who fail anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. This updated meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two drugs. We performed a systematic review in PubMed, Embase , and Cochrane databases searching for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease with previous anti-TNF failure or intolerance. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (SFR) at the pos-induction (12-16 weeks) and maintenance period (48-52 weeks). The odds ratio (OR) was used for binary outcomes with their respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. This meta-analysis included 11 studies and 2724 patients. There was a significant difference favoring ustekinumab in SFR at pos-induction (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88; P  = 0.006; I2  = 27%) and maintenance periods (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.23-2.82; P  = 0.003; I2  = 80%), in clinical remission at pos-induction period (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.58-2.63; P  < 0.001; I2  = 3%), and in treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.60; P  < 0.001; I2  = 0%). In patients with Crohn's disease with prior anti-TNF failure, ustekinumab showed higher SFR during both the pos-induction and maintenance period and a lower rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.

The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity score is superior to reflecting long-term prognosis in ulcerative colitis patients treated with vedolizumab

The scoring systems commonly used to assess endoscopic disease severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical research and practice include the Mayo endoscopic score (MES), ulcerative colitis endoscopic severity index (UCEIS), and degree of ulcerative colitis burden of luminal inflammation (DUBLIN). We aimed to assess and compare the predictive efficacy of the MES, DUBLIN score and UCEIS score for prognosis in UC patients treated with vedolizumab (VDZ). Seventy-four UC patients who treated with VDZ from September 2021 to February 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. We used the MES, DUBLIN and UCEIS score to evaluate endoscopic findings. The predictive capability of these 3 scores for surgery or therapeutic escalation was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The mean MES, DUBLIN and UCEIS score significantly improved from 2.83 ± 0.38, 7.80 ± 1.82 and 6.24 ± 1.51 to 2.07 ± 0.88, 5.57 ± 2.68, and 3.72 ± 2.12, respectively (P < .001). Lower pre-therapeutic UCEIS scores were associated with favorable short-term outcomes. Importantly, the post-therapeutic UCEIS score showed the best predictive capability with an area under curve of 0.871 (95% confidence interval: 0.767-0.976), specificity of 0.654, sensitivity of 0.900, and cutoff value of 3.5. A UCEIS score of ≥ 4 after treatment was correlated with surgical operation or treatment escalation. The UCEIS score is superior to the MES and DUBLIN score in reflecting short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis in UC patients treated with VDZ, and clinical remission could be defined as a UCEIS score ≤ 3.

Dual biological therapy and small molecules in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) including Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBD-U) are chronic inflammatory disorders which can affect the gastrointestinal tract. Anti-tumor necrosis factors antibodies (anti-TNFα) such as infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) are the first line biological therapy for severe or complicated IBDs in pediatric age. Second line therapeutic options as vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are currently used off-label in pediatric age. Furthermore, despite optimization of biologics, a great proportion of patients may fail to respond to biologic agents (up to 30%) or lose response over the time (around 50%) hence these patients may be left without another valid therapeutic option. Consequently, several efforts have been made in the last years in order to develop new drugs and to contrive new therapeutic strategies. Small molecule drugs (SMDs) and combination therapy with either two biologic agents or with a SMD and a biological agent have recently been proposed. Data on safety and efficacy of these new therapeutic options are limited. The objective of the present review is to summarize the most up-to-date available literature in pediatric IBD.

Vedolizumab-Induced Acute Interstitial Nephritis in Ulcerative Colitis

Vedolizumab is used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and is generally well tolerated. We report a 20-year-old man who presented with right flank pain on a background of ulcerative colitis. He was on vedolizumab with his last dose 1 week before the onset of symptoms. Kidney function tests revealed a serum creatinine of 171 μmoL/L and a C-reactive protein of 74 mg/L. Kidney biopsy demonstrated focal acute interstitial nephritis. He was prescribed oral prednisolone and achieved complete recovery of renal function within 3 weeks. At the follow-up after 4 months, his renal function remains normal.

Comparison of the ELISA and ECL Assay for Vedolizumab Anti-drug Antibodies: Assessing the Impact on Pharmacokinetics and Safety Outcomes of the Phase 3 GEMINI Trials

Vedolizumab immunogenicity has been assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a ~ 0.5 μg/mL drug interference, which may underestimate on-drug immunogenicity. We aimed to compare immunogenicity results between ELISA and the new drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay (and the two versions of neutralizing assays, drug-sensitive versus drug-tolerant). The ECL assay drug tolerance is ~ 100 times higher than that of the ELISA (≥ 50 μg/mL vs. 0.5 μg/mL with a 500 ng/mL positive control), and assay sensitivity is < 5 ng/mL for both assays. Vedolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 2000 GEMINI 1 and 2 patients originally tested by ELISA and retested by ECL assay. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) impact on infusion-related reactions and pharmacokinetics (PK) was examined using descriptive statistics and population PK analyses. By ECL assay, 6% (86/1427) of patients treated with vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy tested ADA-positive. Of these, 20 patients were persistently positive and 56 had neutralizing antibodies. By ELISA, 4% (56/1434) of these patients were ADA-positive, 9 were persistently positive, and 33 had neutralizing antibodies. Among 61 patients with infusion-related reactions, 6 (10%) were ADA-positive (2 persistently positive) by ECL assay. By ELISA, 3 (5%) patients were both ADA-positive and persistently positive. Most results (96%) were similar with both assays. In the updated population PK model, ADA-positive status was estimated to increase vedolizumab linear clearance by a factor of 1.10 (95% credible interval 1.03-1.17), which is consistent with previous reports. The impact of ADA on safety and PK modeling remained generally consistent using either ELISA or ECL assay. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00783718 and NCT00783692.

Real-life efficacy of vedolizumab on endoscopic healing in inflammatory bowel disease - A nationwide Hungarian cohort study

Background: GEMINI trials demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).Research design and methods: Aim of this study was to determine the real-life effectiveness of VDZ on endoscopic healing in the Hungarian nationwide cohort of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients based on the changes on clinical and endoscopic scores. Every adult IBD patient in the country (121 UC and 83 CD) who completed the short-term VDZ therapy was enrolled, of which 72 UC and 52 CD patients could complete the long-term therapy.Results: The rates of endoscopic healing were substantially higher in UC compared with CD patients during the short- and long-term therapy (52.9% vs. 21.7%, p < 0.0001, and 51.4% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.015, respectively). In CD, the rate of endoscopic healing was lower at week 14 compared with week 22 (14.5% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.026). Prior anti-TNF-α therapy (88.73%) was not associated with a significant decrease in therapeutic response. The average disease duration was significantly lower in CD patients achieving endoscopic healing at week 52 (11.75 vs. 5.27 years, p = 0.007).Conclusions: VDZ therapy is an effective therapeutic option in anti-TNF-α refractory IBD. However, the endoscopic healing rate was substantially lower and showed a significant delay in CD compared with UC.