Discontinuation of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with secondary antibody deficiency

Access and use of immunoglobulins in supportive cancer care: A thematic analysis of a systematic review data set

Background

Secondary immunodeficiency (SID) disorders are known to occur in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) due to immunosuppressive treatments. Recurring infections causing subsequent morbidity and mortality commonly occur in this patient cohort. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) benefits patients with primary antibody deficiencies. However, evidence supporting their therapeutic role is not as explicit in SID-associated antibody deficiencies, which raises the questions regarding its use in SID and the knock-on effects of this use on its access and availability more generally.

Objectives

This study aimed to learn about the use of immunoglobulins in SID, identify themes concerning its use and access and suggest methods for improving access.

Design

This study included a thematic analysis of a published data set of 43 articles concerning immunoglobulin use and access in SID.

Data Sources and Methods

The data set used to perform the thematic analysis is based on research articles identified from Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and PubMed databases, published as part of a systematic review and part 1 of this two-part publication series.

Results

A thematic synthesis was conducted to identify recurrent themes. The three primary themes included (1) the context for IgRT prescription, which included patient characteristics and cost burden of IgRT administration, and its use in different countries; (2) factors contributing to inappropriate IgRT use, including health care professionals' awareness of IgRT, disparity between guidelines and actual clinical practice, and the effect of shortages on prescription and chemotherapy-induced hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG); and (3) measures identified to improve IgRT use and access, which included multidisciplinary involvement, improved diagnostic tools and safer withdrawal and stewardship protocols.

Conclusions

IgRT use is increasing in HM as a supportive therapy but without comprehensive clinical guidelines and appropriate prescribing recommendations, medication wastage may occur with consequences for immunoglobulin access.

Clinical outcomes following cessation of parenteral immunoglobulin therapy following lung transplantation

Broad use of parenteral immunoglobulin (IgG) therapy in lung transplant (LTx) patients occurs without robust clinical evidence or guidelines. Main indications include secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and treatment or prevention of graft rejection where the use of conventional immunosuppressive therapies is contraindicated. As part of routine auditing of IgG use in our LTx service, we assessed for adverse clinical outcomes related to IgG therapy cessation between November 2017 and February 2022. Of 220 LTx recipients receiving IgG therapy at our center during this period (approximately 20% of our total LTx cohort), 48 patients ceased therapy. No adverse outcomes were experienced in 83.3% patients. About 10.4% recommenced therapy for the same indication within 6 months with no longer term sequelae. One AMR patient developed progressive Chronic lung allograft dysfunction and died within 12 months, where therapy cessation was patient-initiated and associated with general noncompliance. These data provide reassurance that physician-directed cessation of IgG therapy is safe when based on sound clinical information and part of a robust clinical auditing process.

Clinical outcomes of immunoglobulin treatment for patients with secondary antibody deficiency: Data from the Ontario immunoglobulin treatment case registry

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing number of cases of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) and immunoglobulin (Ig) utilization, there is a paucity of data in the literature on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To describe immunoglobulin utilization patterns, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with SAD on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patients with secondary antibody deficiency enrolled in the Ontario Immunoglobulin Treatment (ONIT) Case Registry from June 2020 to September 2022 was completed. Demographics, comorbidities, indications for immunoglobulin treatment, clinical infections at baseline and post IgRT, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 140 patients (58 males; 82 females; median age 68) with SAD during the study period; 131 were on subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) and 9 were on intravenous Ig (IVIG). The most common indication was chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (N = 52). IgRT reduced the average annual number of infections by 82.6%, emergency room (ER) visits by 84.6%, and hospitalizations by 83.3%. Overall, 84.6% of patients reported their health as better compared to before IgRT. Among those patients who switched from IVIG to SCIG (N = 35), 33.3% reported their health as the same, and 62.9% reported their health as better.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that IgRT significantly improved clinical outcomes and patient-reported general health state in patients with SAD. This study also further supports the use of SCIG in patients with SAD.

Recommendations for Management of Secondary Antibody Deficiency in Multiple Myeloma

Secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) is a subtype of secondary immunodeficiency characterized by low serum antibody concentrations (hypogammaglobulinemia) or poor antibody function. SAD is common in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) due to underlying disease pathophysiology and treatment-related immune system effects. Patients with SAD are more susceptible to infections and infection-related morbidity and mortality. With therapeutic advancements improving MM disease control and survival, it is increasingly important to recognize and treat the often-overlooked concurrent immunodeficiency present in patients with MM. The aims of this review are to define SAD and its consequences in MM, increase SAD awareness, and provide recommendations for SAD management. Based on expert panel discussions at a standalone meeting and supportive literature, several recommendations were made. Firstly, all patients with MM should be suspected to have SAD regardless of serum antibody concentrations. Patients should be evaluated for immunodeficiency at MM diagnosis and stratified into management categories based on their individualized risk of SAD and infection. Infection-prevention strategy education, early infection reporting, and anti-infective prophylaxis are key. We recommend prophylactic antibiotics or immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) should be considered in patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia associated with a recurrent or persistent infection. To ensure an individualized and efficient treatment approach is utilized, patient's immunoglobin G concentration and infection burden should be closely monitored throughout treatment. Patient choice regarding route and IgRT treatment is also key in reducing treatment burden. Together, these recommendations and proposed management algorithms can be used to aid physician decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Access and use of immunoglobulins in secondary supportive cancer care: A systematic literature review

Background

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) benefits patients with primary immuno deficiency (PID) originating from the innate or polygenic defects in the immune system. However, evidence supporting their therapeutic role is not as explicit in secondary immuno deficiency (SID) resulting from the treatment of haematological malignancies.

Objectives

This study aimed to (1) create a dataset of relevant research papers, which explore the use of IgRT in SID for analysis, (2) assess the risk of bias within this dataset and (3) study the characteristics of these papers.

Design

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. In addition to the risk of bias, the study characteristics explored in this article included study design, study geographical location and year of publication.

Data Sources and Methods

To identify studies relevant to the research question, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched. The Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) framework was used to assess study quality. Risk of bias and quality of studies were assessed in accordance with the study design. As one model was not appropriate to assess bias in all articles, several tools were used.

Results

A total of 43 studies were identified from the literature search as relevant to the research objective. The most common study design was a retrospective case-control cohort study (n = 16/43), and randomised trials were among the least commonly used approaches (n = 1). Research in this area is occurring around the globe including the United States (n = 7), Italy (n = 7), China, India, Japan and throughout Europe. The annual number of papers in this area has varied from 2012 (n = 1) to 2021 (n = 7). The studies in this article demonstrated a varied risk of bias, with 9 of the 20 cohort studies scoring less than 5 out of 9 stars.

Conclusions

Randomised controlled trials are less frequently used to assess access and use of immunoglobulins. More commonly, a retrospective case-control cohort study was used which correlates with the higher risk of bias seen in the studies in this article. Most of the research concerning immunoglobulin use and access occurs in higher-income countries.

Treating secondary antibody deficiency in patients with haematological malignancy: European expert consensus

OBJECTIVES

Secondary antibody deficiency (SAD), associated with severe, recurrent or persistent infections, is common in patients with haematological malignancies (HM), but unifying guidance on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) in these patients is lacking. We aimed to develop consensus statements for the use of IgRT in patients with HM.

METHODS

A Delphi exercise was employed to test the level of agreement on statements developed by a Task Force based on available data and their clinical experience. In Round 1, an Expert Panel, comprising specialist EU physicians caring for patients with HM, helped to refine the statements. In Round 2, experts rated their agreement with the statements. In Round 3, experts who had scored their agreement as ≤4 were invited to review their agreement based on the overall feedback.

RESULTS

Three definitions and 20 statements were formulated and tested for consensus, covering measurement of IgG levels, initiation and discontinuation of IgRT, dosing, and the use of subcutaneous IgG. Consensus (agreement ≥70% on Likert-type scale) was reached for all three definitions and 18 statements.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations have been developed with the aim of providing guidance for the use of IgRT to prevent severe, recurrent or persistent infections in patients with HM and SAD.