Dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia: review of the literature and algorithm proposal for clinical management

Frequency and clinical features of disease flares in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, an interleukin 4 (IL-4) receptor α-antagonist approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, is considered effective in preventing disease recurrences. However, the incidence and characteristics od atopic dermatitis flares during treatment with dupilumab in a real-life setting have not been described in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of disease flares in patients in treatment with dupilumab and to describe the features of flares in our study population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study in which we collected demographic and clinical data on adult patients with a diagnosis of severe atopic dermatitis in treatment with dupilumab for a minimum of six months, who reached EASI75 within six months of treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Recurrences were recorded for 38.4% of patients and 7.1% developed a second recurrence. The EASI at recurrence was always lower than the EASI before treatment initiation. The localization of disease at head and neck before treatment was associated to the same localization of disease at the first recurrence (p = 0.011). The risk of recurrence was associated to the baseline EASI score (p = 0.005). The presence of dupilumab-related conjunctivitis was significantly associated to recurrences (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with dupilumab does not exclude the risk of a relapse, which can be estimated around 50% within a timespan of three years. In the most cases, flares should not be regarded as treatment failures, and can be easily managed with additional treatment.

Sustained Efficacy and Low Rate of Adverse Events of Dupilumab in Type-2 CRSwNP Over 48 Months

OBJECTIVE

Dupilumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that interferes with the inflammatory cascade in type-2 Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Studies evaluating its safety and efficacy in the long term are still few. Our study analyzed outcomes and adverse events after 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of dupilumab administration in patients affected by CRSwNP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A monocentric, retrospective study assessing blood eosinophil (BEC) and total IgE count, Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), Nasal Polyps Score (NPS), sniffin' sticks identification test (SSIT-16), and Lund-Mackay score (LMS) in patients receiving subcutaneous Dupilumab 300 mg/2 weeks for at least 1 year and up to 4 years.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled, of whom 70, 38, 25, and 12 completed a 12, 24-, 36-, and 48-month follow-up period, respectively. Patients showed a very rapid and long-lasting statistically significant improvement in their SNOT-22, NPS, and SSIT after 1 month, and this trend was kept in the following 48 months. The total IgE count has been constantly reducing over the study period. BEC increased in the first 6 months and then gradually decreased over time, reaching an even smaller value than baseline at 36 and 48 months. Four patients (5.9%) complained of severe adverse events within 6 months, with two interrupting treatment due to hypereosinophilia.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab was safe and effective in extinguishing the symptomatologic burden of CRSwNP as early as 1 month and up to 48 months, with side events limited to the first 6 months of administration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Effectiveness of Switching From Upadacitinib to Tralokinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disorder characterized by intense itchiness. Systemic therapies for AD include Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and various biological agents. The effects of transitioning from the JAK1 inhibitor, upadacitinib, to the anti-interleukin 13 antibody, tralokinumab, remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the transition from 15 mg of upadacitinib to tralokinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

This analysis included 20 patients who switched from 15 mg of upadacitinib to tralokinumab due to an inadequate response or adverse events (AEs). We assessed the total and regional eczema area and severity index (EASI), which included assessments of the head and neck, trunk, and upper and lower limbs, along with erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, lichenification, and the peak pruritus numerical-rating scale (PP-NRS), initially (start of 15 mg of upadacitinib), at the transition point (week 0), and during follow-up at weeks 4 and 12.

RESULTS

The EASI, EASI of the four anatomical regions, and EASI of the four clinical manifestations significantly declined from baseline at weeks 4 and 12, with no substantial reductions from week 0. The PP-NRS score notably decreased from baseline at week 4. Achieving EASI of 50 and 75 improved post-switching.

CONCLUSION

Transitioning to tralokinumab substantially alleviated rash in patients with AD who experienced suboptimal responses or AEs to 15 mg of upadacitinib.

Biological therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease. High proportions of patients with CRSwNP characterized by type 2 inflammation fail to gain adequate control with conventional treatment. The application of biologics in clinics and assessments of novel biologics in clinical trials are blooming in expectations to fulfill the unmet medical needs of patients with CRSwNP with type 2 inflammation.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive search of PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE for the most recent evidence, we thoroughly summarize current advances in biological therapies for treating patients with CRSwNP.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, biological therapy has been in the spotlight in clinical studies on CRSwNP. Biologics have proven to be efficacious in reducing nasal polyp size, alleviating CRSwNP-related symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing the need for systemic corticosteroids or endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. The considerable efficacy and safety profile of biologics has offered patients with refractory CRSwNP another treatment option. However, some concerns remain to be addressed. Aspects such as the position of biological therapy in the management of CRSwNP, traits of patients suitable for certain biologics, etc. necessitate efforts to elucidate these unknowns in order to provide patients with tailored therapy.

Chinese Position Paper on Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Emerging biologics that selectively target key cytokines present a promising therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from severe, uncontrollable chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Despite the limited availability of registered biologics for CRSwNP treatment in China, the country is experiencing rapid development in this field. It is imperative to standardize the application of biologic agents in CRSwNP management in preparation for their future integration into the CRSwNP care pathway. The Rhinology Group, Chinese Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; the Rhinology Group, Chinese Medical Doctor Association of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; and the Nasal and Ocular Allergy Group, Chinese Society of Allergy have convened an expert panel consisting of principal investigators experienced in clinical trials of biologic treatment for CRSwNP. This expert panel was assembled to discuss the application of biologic agents in patients with CRSwNP in China. Additionally, the latest findings on the pathogenesis of CRSwNP, mechanisms of biologic agents, and efficacy and safety of biologic treatment in patients with CRSwNP were reviewed, with a special emphasis on research evidence from China. The expert panel reached a consensus on several critical issues, including criteria for the prescription, treatment course, and efficacy evaluation from a Chinese perspective. This position paper aims to guide Chinese physicians in the use of biologic agents for patients with CRSwNP. As our experience with biologic treatment continues to grow, this position paper will be further updated.

Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: Current Status and Clinical Considerations in Korea

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts quality of life and places a burden on healthcare systems. The advent of biologics targeting type 2 immune pathways offers new therapeutic options for severe and/or uncontrolled CRSwNP. Initially, biologic use was guided by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) 2020 and the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) guidelines, despite limited data on clinical indications, response measures, and treatment duration. Since then, numerous studies and the EPOS/EUFOREA 2023 update have refined these guidelines. The update defines clinical indications for biologics based on type 2 inflammation markers by lowering the blood eosinophil threshold from 250 to 150 cells/μL. The response to biologics is now more simply categorized into three levels based on reductions in nasal polyp size, improvements in quality of life, and enhancement of smell. Treatment evaluation is recommended at 6 months with annual follow-up. Longer administration intervals, such as every four weeks, have also proven effective in well-controlled patients. Although specific guidelines for discontinuation or switching biologics remain lacking, clinical judgment is essential in determining when treatment should be stopped or adjusted. Additionally, regulatory updates support the use of biologics for CRSwNP, and novel agents such as tezepelumab (an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody) continue to show promise. Finally, in Korea, biologics for CRSwNP are not covered by national health insurance, leading to extended dosing intervals due to high costs. Despite this limitation, studies have shown that adjusted dosing can maintain subjective quality of life. Recent studies by Korean authors have also explored practical considerations such as dosing intervals and comparisons to surgery. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness and prospective studies tailored to the Korean healthcare system.

AP2M1 as the potential biomarker for prediction of the response of atopic dermatitis to Dupilumab therapy: Multi-omics analysis and evidence

Many atopic dermatitis (AD) patients have suboptimal responses to Dupilumab therapy. This study identified key genes linked to this resistance using multi-omics approaches to benefit more patients. We selected a prospective cohort of 54 AD treated with Dupilumab from the GEO database. After identifying resistant genes via WGCNA and differential expression analysis, we used machine learning techniques to screen key genes and develop a predictive model. It was found that four key genes (AP2M1, BMP4, DNM1, and RHEB) were identified, showing excellent diagnostic performance for Dupilumab resistance (AUC = 0.832-0.861, P < 0.05) and validated in AD patients via RT-qPCR (P < 0.05). Among them, AP2M1 was significantly correlated with the clinical severity of AD (R = 0.5,P = 0.04) and identified as a potential risk factor (HR = 13.45, 95%CI(1.71-105.65), P = 0.02). The results of immunohistochemistry also revealed overexpression of AP2M1 in AD tissue (P = 0.002). Additionally, immune infiltration analysis suggested that AP2M1-mediated Dupilumab resistance may involve mast cells (R = -0.51, P = 0.02), which also supported by single-cell analysis. And we constructed a regulatory network of AP2M1. Finally, we explored the drug Fostamatinib, targeting AP2M1. In conclusion, AP2M1 may serve as a biomarker for those AD patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to Dupilumab.

Enlarged Frontal Sinusotomy and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: An Effective Strategy to Control the Disease

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a disease with a strong impact on the quality of life (QoL) which treatment is based on local intranasal corticosteroids (ICS) and iterative courses of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) in case of relapse. When medical treatment is insufficient, surgery is indicated. We investigated the impact of enlarged frontal sinusotomies (EFS: Draf IIb or Draf III) on QoL and annual SCS consumption of patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 38 patients, who underwent EFS at Lariboisière University Hospital (CHU) in Paris, France, between 2006 and 2020. All patients were asked to complete SNOT-22 questionnaires concerning pre- and post-op status. Patients' medical and sinus surgery history as well as the number of SCS treatments per year before and after surgery were also collected.

RESULTS

Of the 38 patients, 33 underwent a Draf III procedure and 5 a Draf IIb, with no major complications reported. Surgery resulted in a significant improvement in SNOT-22 scores (-32.7 ± 19.3, P < 0.001), with 19/22 items improving significantly. The number of annual SCS treatments decreased significantly from a mean of 4.8 ± 4.3 to 0.6 ± 1.2 (P < 0.001). During the follow-up (mean 88 months), 95% of our patients showed a satisfying disease control and only 2 patients required revision surgery for poor disease control 5 years after EFS.

CONCLUSION

EFS appears to be an effective and durable therapeutic option to improve the QoL of patients with severe CRSwNP and to reduce their SCS consumption without major complications.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Lebrikizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 16-Week Study in Japan

Background: Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of lebrikizumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of lebrikizumab on Japanese patients with AD. Methods: This two-center study included 126 Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with lebrikizumab plus topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks. Eczema area and severity index (EASI), investigator's global assessment (IGA), peak-pruritus (PP)-numerical rating scale (NRS), sleep quality NRS, AD control tool (ADCT), dermatology life quality index (DLQI), patient-oriented eczema measure (POEM), immunoglobulin E (IgE), thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and total eosinophil count (TEC) were assessed during the treatment. Results: Lebrikizumab reduced all clinical indexes at week 4, which was maintained until week 16. The achievement rates of EASI 50, 75, 90, 100, and IGA 0/1 at week 16 were 83.1%, 57.1%, 27.3%, 11.7%, and 33.3%, respectively. The achievement rates of ≥4-point reduction in PP-NRS, sleep quality NRS, or DLQI, ADCT <7-point, and POEM ≤7-point at week 16 were 75.9%, 68.8%, 65.9%, 76.9%, and 80.4%, respectively. IgE, TARC, and LDH decreased while TEC increased during the treatment. No new safety concerns were observed. Conclusion: The 16-week treatment with lebrikizumab generated favorable effectiveness and safety in Japanese AD patients in real-world practice.

Eosinophil-Driven vs. Eosinophil-Associated Severe Asthma: Practical Implications for Target Treatment

Severe asthma (SA) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of asthmatic patients, and eosinophils are considered key pathogenetic actors in a significant number of patients. Biological therapies have been demonstrated to improve asthma control by decreasing exacerbation rates and reducing the use of oral corticosteroids. In this context, phenotyping and endotyping patients with SA is essential for selecting the most effective therapeutic approach. For this purpose, biomarkers such as IgE, absolute blood eosinophil count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are crucial in defining a patient's inflammatory profile. Their integration provides a framework for classifying asthma into T2-high, T2-mild, or T2-low categories, guiding personalized treatment strategies. By incorporating multiple biomarkers into a unified model, it is possible to better stratify patients and optimize biologic therapy selection, paving the way for improved outcomes in SA management. This review aims to evaluate the role of phenotyping and endotyping SA patients, with particular attention to the impact of eosinophilic inflammation and combinatory biomarkers on decision-making processes for the selection of biological therapies.

Profiling Blood Hypereosinophilia in Patients on Dupilumab Treatment for Respiratory Conditions: A Real-Life Snapshot

BACKGROUND

A transient and usually asymptomatic increase in blood eosinophil count (BEC) associated with dupilumab treatment has been described. Predicting factors related to the increase in BEC and the occurrence of symptoms are still poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate frequency, timing, duration, clinical relevance, and potential predictors of the increase in BEC in a real-life multicenter cohort of patients affected by asthma and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treated with dupilumab.

METHODS

BEC and clinical conditions at baseline and every 3 months after the start of dupilumab treatment were assessed. Any adverse drug reaction was also recorded. Remission of dupilumab-associated eosinophilia was defined by follow-up BEC values <0.5 × 109 cells/L.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 of 195 (55%) patients experienced an increased BEC after dupilumab initiation, but only 29 of 195 (14.9%) showed hypereosinophilia. BEC peak occurred 6 months after the start of treatment and resolved after 9 months (median time). The probability of developing hypereosinophilia was 3.3 times higher in patients with the baseline BEC between 0.5 × 109 and 1.5 × 109 cells/L. The occurrence of symptoms during BEC peak was higher in patients with comorbidities and in patients showing any increase in BEC.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, dupilumab treatment in patients with asthma and/or CRSwNP was often associated with a transient increase in BEC, but hypereosinophilia rarely occurred. Onset of symptoms co-occurring with BEC peak was observed in a minority of subjects. BEC should not preclude dupilumab initiation or continuation but should be monitored for at least 8 months after treatment begins, particularly in the case of baseline eosinophilia/hypereosinophilia and/or comorbidities.

Ten clinical conundrums in the management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is an immune-mediated, inflammatory, multisystemic disease that is considered a form of ANCA-associated vasculitis and whose association with asthma and blood and tissue eosinophilia differentiate it from other types of vasculitis. Nevertheless, diagnosis of EGPA may be difficult or delayed not only because of the rarity of the disease, but also because other diseases can present with similar manifestations.

AREAS COVERED

We review a series of key areas in EGPA, namely, laboratory and clinical indicators of disease, diagnosis, role of biomarkers, induction and maintenance therapy, and use of traditional and novel drugs. This narrative review was based on a thorough search of PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of available tools for diagnosing EGPA, and more efforts should be made to identify clinical and laboratory red flags, with the purpose of achieving an early diagnosis before irreversible damage occurs. New effective therapies are available, although future research should target an approach that spares glucocorticoids, reduces the risk of flares and organ damage, and maintains long-term remission with minimum adverse effects.

Appropriate Injection Intervals of Dupilumab in Patients With Adult Atopic Dermatitis: A Step Toward Developing Guidelines for Daily Practice

BACKGROUND

There is a growing demand for extending dosing intervals of dupilumab injections in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) due to treatment burden and side effects. However, studies on successful dose reduction in real-world settings are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of a patient-centered dupilumab tapering regimen and to propose guidelines for target patients, appropriate intervals, and timing for tapering.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included moderate to severe adult AD patients who underwent at least 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment. Interval prolongation was considered in controlled patients assessed by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and serum inflammatory markers after at least 40 weeks of treatment with a standard regimen. Logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to compare repetitive measurements over time between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were included with 11 patients extending intervals to 3-4 weeks without flare-ups. The mean duration of dupilumab treatment before tapering was 53.27 weeks. The tapering group exhibited significantly lower body mass index. All patients of the tapering group showed EASI scores under 4 and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels under 1,000 IU/mL at week 40. EASI scores and IgE levels remained consistently low after dose reduction, with a mean follow-up time of 14.36 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with extended dosing intervals demonstrated sustained effectiveness. Dose tapering might be a valuable option for non-obese patients with positive clinical response characterized by an EASI score under 4 and IgE levels under 1,000 at week 40.

Dupilumab Use in Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndromes: A Multicenter Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are defined as hypereosinophilia with eosinophil-related clinical manifestations, some of which overlap in presentation with asthma, atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Dupilumab is approved to treat these conditions but can induce a transient rise in the absolute eosinophil count and rare eosinophil-related complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether eosinophil-related complications of dupilumab are increased in HES.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients with HES treated with dupilumab enrolled on an institutional review board-approved research protocol at the National Institutes of Health (NCT00001406) or receiving care at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Clinical response and treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Serum mediators were assessed in a subset of patients before and after dupilumab using stored samples.

RESULTS

Among the 28 patients (15 male, 13 female; median age 41.5 y), the most common prescribing indication for dupilumab was chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (n = 11). Twenty-three patients (82%) showed significant clinical improvement on dupilumab. Hypereosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count > 1.5 × 109/L) recurred or worsened in 9 of 20 patients on dupilumab monotherapy. Moreover, 4 of 20 (20%) patients developed an eosinophil-related complication with dupilumab discontinuation and/or addition of eosinophil-lowering therapy. None of the 8 patients who received dupilumab while in hematological remission on an eosinophil-lowering biologic developed hypereosinophilia or an eosinophil-related complication. Serum immunoglobulin E and eotaxin levels decreased on dupilumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that dupilumab is effective in treating residual symptoms in HES patients but that the incidence of eosinophil-related complications is increased. Concomitant eosinophil-lowering therapy may reduce the risk of eosinophil-related complications during dupilumab therapy in patients with HES.

Eosinophilia and Adverse Effects of Dupilumab for Respiratory Indications: A Real-World Setting

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab has been used with significant benefit in the treatment of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated transient eosinophilia and rare eosinophil-related and other adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize dupilumab-associated eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count ≥1.5 × 103/μL within 36 weeks of dupilumab initiation) and adverse effects associated in real-world patients with asthma and CRSwNP in the United States.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 251 patients receiving dupilumab for asthma and/or CRSwNP seen at a single institution.

RESULTS

Among the 142 patients who had absolute eosinophil counts checked before and after treatment, 16 (11.3%) had posttreatment eosinophilia, including 11 (7.7%) who had new eosinophilia on dupilumab initiation. Thirteen patients with posttreatment eosinophilia remained on dupilumab, 10 of whom had resolution of eosinophilia. Eosinophil-related adverse effects were rare, and cases of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis were limited to one patient with eosinophilia and one patient with normal eosinophil levels who was receiving systemic corticosteroids. Other adverse effects included arthralgias (13 of 251; 5.2%), rash (8 of 251; 3.2%), and conjunctivitis (7 of 251; 2.8%). All patients with pretreatment eosinophilia and most patients with posttreatment eosinophilia received significant treatment benefit for the respiratory disease with dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is seen in a subset of patients, persistent eosinophilia or eosinophil-related adverse effects are rare. Furthermore, treatment benefit with dupilumab despite eosinophilia supports its continued use in both asthma and CRSwNP.

Postmarketing Analysis of Eosinophilic Adverse Reactions in the use of Biologic Therapies for Type 2 Inflammatory Conditions

BACKGROUND

Temporary eosinophilia is a potential adverse reaction of monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of a variety of type 2 inflammatory conditions, including asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical significance of eosinophilia and eosinophilic adverse reactions following the initiation of biologic therapy are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the postmarketing, eosinophilic adverse reactions with clinical significance in patients treated with the 3 biologic therapies approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for CRSwNP: dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab.

METHODS

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard was searched for eosinophilic adverse reactions related to dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab treatments from November 2004 to December 2022. Data regarding each of the eosinophilic adverse reactions were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 218, 270, and 134 reports of eosinophilic adverse reactions were reported among patients who were treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, respectively. The most common eosinophilic adverse reaction was eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (338 patients), followed by eosinophilic respiratory tract reactions (158 patients). The most common indication for biological treatment among the reaction groups was asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Eosinophilic adverse reactions are rare but consequential complications of biological treatment. They are more common among patients treated for asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Measuring and monitoring blood eosinophil levels may be appropriate in specific clinical instances when patients are started on different biologic therapies for type 2 inflammatory conditions.

Heterogeneity and individualized therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), as a heterogeneous component of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, may be induced by a series of environmental and genetic factors, involved with a variety of immune cells and immune components, and presented with various clinical manifestations, with multiple organs and systems (respiratory, skin, heart, kidney, nerve, etc.) involved. The choice of glucocorticoid (GC) dosage and immunosuppressant in traditional treatment strategies varies greatly from individual to individual and is not universally applicable in all the EGPA phenotype spectrum, especially in relapsing or refractory diseases. With the understanding of the heterogeneity of EGPA, a variety of therapeutic approaches are emerging and improving the traditional treatment model. In this review, we summarized the heterogeneity of EGPA etiology and pathogenesis. Clinical and pathological manifestations of the same organ involved also show significant differences and there are even gender differences. Biological treatments that mainly target type 2 inflammatory pathways are widely used in clinical practice for remission induction and maintenance of EGPA. Targeted biological therapy has shown excellent performance in reducing GC dosage and controlling symptoms and recurrence. However, a large number of high-quality randomized controlled studies are still under research for relapsing or refractory EGPA with special organ involvement. We believe that EGPA has a highly heterogeneous phenotype spectrum, and the treatment patterns targeting key molecules in the pathogenesis are of great value for individual treatment of EGPA.

Comparison between clinical and cytological findings in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with Dupilumab

PURPOSE

Biologics represent a new therapeutic strategy for severe and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Usually, their actual therapeutic effectiveness is assessed by reduction in nasal polyps and/or improvement in nasal symptoms and quality of life. However, these measures do not consider nasal immunophlogosis, which can be evaluated through nasal cytology. The purpose of this study was to assess not only the clinical impact but also the cellular changes in the nasal inflammatory infiltrate observed through nasal cytology of CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab for 24 months.

METHODS

Fifty-five CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab were collected. Patients were evaluated before starting treatment and at one, three, six, nine months, one year, one and a half years, and two years after the first drug administration. During follow-up visits patients underwent endoscopic evaluation, nasal symptoms and quality of life assessment, complete blood count and nasal cytology.

RESULTS

During follow-up, significant improvement was found in Nasal Polyps Score (NPS), nasal patency, olfaction, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Regarding nasal cytology, a reduction in eosinophils and mast cells in the cellular infiltrate was observed over the two-year follow-up period compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab has demonstrated broad efficacy in the management of CRSwNP from both clinical and cytological findings. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate the biologics' impact on nasal mucosal inflammatory cells by nasal cytology with the aim of better identifying each patient's endotype and predicting the response to biologics.

Efficacy of dupilumab and risk factors for dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia in severe asthma: a preliminary study from China

OBJECTIVE

Dupilumab has been approved for the treatment of severe asthma with type 2 inflammation by inhibiting interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling. However, dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia (HE) has been reported and should not be ignored. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dupilumab in Chinese patients with severe asthma, whether HE affects its efficacy, and the possible risk factors for HE.

METHODS

20 patients with severe asthma who received dupilumab treatment for at least 12 months in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from 2019 to 2022 were included. We compared clinical data and laboratory tests results before dupilumab treatment and at 4 and 12 months after treatment. Based on whether dupilumab treatment triggers HE defined as blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥ 1.5 × 109 cells/L, the patients were allocated into non-HE and HE groups.

RESULTS

The patients showed a significant increase in asthma control test (ACT) scores, a decrease in the number of exacerbations, a decrease in the proportion of patients taking an oral corticosteroid (OCS) and in the dose, and a significant improvement in the pulmonary function parameters FEV1/FVC (%) and FEV1 (% predicted) after 4 and 12 months of treatment with dupilumab. For type 2 inflammatory biomarkers, the levels of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), sputum eosinophil count percentage (SEC%) and total immunoglobulin E (TIgE) decreased significantly, whereas BEC were higher after 4 months of treatment, but returned to baseline levels after 12 months. 8 patients (40%) developed asymptomatic HE after dupilumab, and the efficacy was not significantly different between the HE and non-HE groups. The earliest BEC elevation appeared at 1 month after treatment, but most of them declined after 6 months, and basically returned to the baseline level around 12 months of treatment. In addition, we further found that when patients had FeNO ≥ 60 ppb, food allergens positive and combined eosinophilic otitis media (EOM), their BEC increased significantly more than that of the control group after 4 months as well as 12 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that dupilumab was efficacious in Chinese patients with severe asthma, and some patients developed asymptomatic, self-limited HE, which did not affect its efficacy. Additionally, FeNO ≥60 ppb, food allergens positive, and co-morbidities with EOM may be the risk factors for developing HE.

Real-world data show sustained therapeutic effects of dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) over 3 years

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory condition affecting the nose and paranasal sinuses, posing a significant socio-economic impact with substantial challenges in management. Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation such as dupilumab, have emerged as promising options. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by comprehensively evaluating the 3-year impact of sustained dupilumab therapy in CRSwNP.

METHODS

A multicentric, retrospective collection of real-world data from five tertiary referral centers in Germany was conducted, enrolling 150 adult patients. The study investigated patient-reported outcomes, disease-specific indices and clinical measures, focusing on therapeutic response persistence, adverse events, and factors influencing treatment continuity.

RESULTS

Results indicate significant improvements in clinical parameters from baseline (n = 150) with sustained effectiveness after 36 months (n = 138) as indicated in mean score ± standard deviation. Dupilumab treatment significantly improved overall disease-related impairment (VAS score: 7.5 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.3) and rhinosinusitis symptoms (SNOT-22: 59.4 ± 19.4 to 18.0 ± 15.0). Nasal Polyp Scores (NPS) decreased (5.3 ± 1.8 to 0.7 ± 1.1), and olfactory function improved (3.2 ± 2.5 to 8.4 ± 2.8), with three out of four patients achieving normosmia or hyposmia after 36 months. An "Excellent" treatment response according to EUFOREA23 criteria was observed in 76.5% of patients after 36 months. Sixteen patients discontinued Dupilumab, 12 permanently. Adverse events totaled 69 in 48 patients, commonly self-limiting.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the enduring effectiveness and lack of habituation to dupilumab after a sustained therapy of 3 years, providing valuable insights into its long-term therapeutic implications for CRSwNP patients.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Reasons for Discontinuation of Dupilumab in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Importance

Limited data are available on the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.

Objective

To evaluate clinical effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab treatment in children, adults, and older adults with AD with up to 5 years of treatment in daily practice.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the BioDay registry (4 academic and 10 nonacademic hospitals in the Netherlands) to identify patients with AD of all ages who were treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and December 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, stratified by children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). In addition, time to response, treatment responders, EASI subscores, second treatment episodes, and thymus- and activation-related chemokine and eosinophil levels were assessed. For patients who discontinued dupilumab, the reason for discontinuation was evaluated.

Results

In total, 1286 patients with AD (median [IQR] age, 38 [26-54] years; 726 [56.6%] male) were treated with dupilumab, including 130 children, 1025 adults, and 131 older adults. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 87.5 (32.0-157.0) weeks. Most patients maintained controlled AD, with EASI of 7 or lower and NRS for pruritus of 4 or lower varying between 78.6% and 92.3% and 72.2% and 88.2% for up to 5 years of treatment, respectively, while up to 70.5% of all patients prolonged the dosing interval to mostly 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks. Mean EASI and NRS for pruritus were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.7-4.3), respectively, after 5 years of treatment. Statistically significant differences between age groups were found over time for EASI and IGA; however, differences were rather small (week 52: EASI, 0.3-1.6; IGA, 0.12-0.26). No statistically significant differences between age groups were found for NRS for pruritus. Median thymus- and activation-related chemokine levels considerably decreased from 1751 pg/mL (95% CI, 1614-1900 pg/mL) to 390 pg/mL (95% CI, 368-413 pg/mL) after 6 months of treatment and remained low. Median eosinophil levels temporarily increased up to week 16, with a subsequently statistically significant decrease over time. In total, 306 patients (23.8%) discontinued dupilumab after a median (IQR) of 54.0 (29.0-110.00) weeks, with adverse events among 98 patients (7.6%) and ineffectiveness among 85 patients (6.6%) as the most frequently reported reasons. Forty-one patients (3.2%) restarted dupilumab, and most of these patients recaptured response.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up, dupilumab maintained its clinical effectiveness, while two-thirds of patients tapered to a dosing interval of every 3 or 4 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in 23.8% of patients mainly due to adverse events and/or ineffectiveness.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CRSwNP in the real-life setting: a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The recent approval of Dupilumab has profoundly revolutionized the management of patients affected by severe and recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). However, a review that summarizes the results of real-life studies and compares them to phase 3 studies SINUS-24 and 52 is still lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of all real-life studies published from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Patients characteristics at baseline and 6 and 12 months after starting Dupilumab were extracted and compared to those from phase 3 trials: age, sex, smoking habits, comorbid asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), hematic eosinophils and total IgE, NasalAQ2 Polyps Score (NPS), smell, SNOT-22, adverse events (AEs), and response to treatment.

RESULTS

15 papers were included with an overall number of 1658 patients. A higher rate of comorbidities and previous ESS was found in patients from real-life studies. In addition, they had worse smell and SNOT-22 at baseline compared to patients from SINUS-24 and 52. Comorbid and post-ESS patients tended to have a faster NPS and SNOT-22 improvement, although the absolute values were not clinically relevant. A more extensive surgery and a number of ESS ≥ 2 were related to worse olfactory outcomes, probably due to iatrogenic damage. No correlation was found between hematic eosinophils and outcomes. AEs were reported by 12.4% of patients and 2.2% had to discontinue dupilumab. Weight gain was an emergent AE (0.8%), probably related to the restored sense of smell and taste. Non-responders were 3.5% and they were switched to systemic steroid, ESS, or another biologic.

CONCLUSION

Despite some differences in prescription criteria between countries, dupilumab was demonstrated to be effective even in the real-life scenario. However, emerging AEs and possible unknown long-term AEs of a likely lifelong therapy should be considered.

Tralokinumab as an Alternative to Dupilumab in a Patient with Atopic Dermatitis and Asthma who Developed Hypereosinophilia: A Case Report

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

[Results of a survey on the current management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments.

RESULTS

Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%).

CONCLUSION

Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use.

Efficacy of Biologics in Patients with Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is challenging. Biological therapies have been reported as adjunctive treatments for ABPA, primarily in case series or case reports. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of biologics for managing ABPA both qualitatively and quantitatively.

METHODS

All articles on APBA published in October 2023 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase databases. The effects of interest were the mean changes from baseline for outcomes, including exacerbation rates, oral corticosteroids usage (OCS), and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels. Reported outcomes were quantitatively synthesized by usual or individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022373396.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were included in the systematic review including 346 patients. Sixteen studies on omalizumab were pooled for the usual meta-analysis. Omalizumab therapy significantly reduced exacerbation rates (- 2.29 [95%CI - 3.32, - 1.26]), OCS dosage (- 10.91 mg [95%CI - 18.98, - 2.85]), and total IgE levels (- 273.07 IU/mL [95%CI - 379.30, - 166.84]), meanwhile improving FEV1% predicted (10.09% [95%CI 6.62, 13.55]). Thirty-one studies on dupilumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab were pooled to perform an IPD meta-analysis, retrospectively. Both dupilumab and mepolizumab significantly reduced exacerbation rates, OCS, and total IgE levels. Benralizumab showed a similar trend, but it was not statistically significant. Tezepelumab showed weak evidence of its effects on ABPA. All five biologics led to milder clinical symptoms (e.g., cough, wheezing) with serious adverse effects that happened once in omalizumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate the clinical benefit of omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab in patients with ABPA. Further randomized, controlled studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Feasibility of continued treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease who developed eosinophilic pneumonia: 3 case reports

Several reports have described dupilumab-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) after treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease. Other reports have suggested the efficacy of dupilumab for chronic EP (CEP). Whether dupilumab can be continued in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease who develop EP during dupilumab treatment remains unclear. We present herein three cases with different clinical presentations involving dupilumab and EP. In Case 1, dupilumab was discontinued because of dupilumab-induced EP during the treatment of asthma. In Case 2, although pre-existing idiopathic EP worsened during the treatment of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), dupilumab was continued. In Case 3, CEP and ECRS were successfully treated with dupilumab and corticosteroids were discontinued. In conclusion, treatment with dupilumab in patients with type 2 inflammatory disease and idiopathic EP is worth considering if the benefits are deemed to outweigh the risks and careful attention is given to the clinical course.

Severe hypereosinophilia in a patient treated with dupilumab and shift to mepolizumab: the importance of multidisciplinary management. A case report and literature review

Type 2 inflammation is a heterogeneous condition due to the complex activation of different immunological pathways. Rapid progress in research to evaluate the efficacy of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma has led to the availability of effective therapeutic options. These drugs are safe, but temporary iatrogenic hypereosinophilia may sometimes be associated with clinical symptoms or organ damage. Here, we describe a case of severe hypereosinophilia in a patient with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma treated with dupilumab and a subsequent therapeutic shift to mepolizumab that led to maintenance of symptom control and concomitant normalization of blood eosinophil count.

Temporal trends of blood eosinophilia in severe uncontrolled CRSwNP treated with dupilumab: a real-life study

PURPOSE

Induced eosinophilia is commonly related to dupilumab treatment. We analysed the temporal trends of blood eosinophilia in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP during the first year of treatment with dupilumab in real-life setting to evaluate its correlation with outcomes of response and adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP treated with dupilumab at our institution were enrolled. At each visit, we evaluated AEC, outcomes of response to treatment and AEs.

RESULTS

A significant increase in AEC was observed since the first month with a peak at 3 months; at 12 months, the values returned comparable to those at baseline. A ≥ 50% increase of the baseline AEC with a value greater than 500 cells/mm3 was documented in 38/74 patients (Group A) regardless of the time of observation, whereas in 36/74 patients (Group B), no changes were observed. Analysing the blood eosinophilia trend over time in group A, we observed a temporary eosinophilia with early onset (within 6 months), persistent eosinophilia with early onset, and eosinophilia with late onset. No differences in terms of outcomes of response to treatment or AEs were found between Group A and Group B, or between patients who developed an AEC ≥ 1500 cells/mm3 or not.

CONCLUSION

In our series, we observed that an increase in AEC with different temporal trends may be observed in CRSwNP patients during the first year of treatment with dupilumab. In our series, eosinophilia is not correlated with a negative outcome of response to treatment or a risk of AEs.

Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND

The management of uncontrolled severe asthma has greatly improved since the advent of novel biologic therapies. Up to August 2022, five biologics have been approved for the type 2 asthma phenotype: anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab), and anti-IL4 (dupilumab) monoclonal antibodies. These drugs are usually well tolerated, although long-term safety information is limited, and some adverse events have not yet been fully characterized. Spontaneous reporting systems represent the cornerstone for the detection of potential signals and evaluation of the real-world safety of all marketed drugs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of safety data of biologics for severe asthma using VigiBase, the World Health Organization global pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

We selected all de-duplicated individual case safety reports (ICSRs) attributed to five approved biologics for severe asthma in VigiBase, up to 31st August 2022 (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab). Descriptive frequency analyses of ICSRs were carried out both as a whole class and as individual products. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the measure of disproportionality for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the study drugs compared with either all other suspected drugs (Reference Group 1, RG1) or inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β-agonists (ICSs/LABAs) (Reference Group 2, RG2) or with oral corticosteroids (OCSs) (Reference Group 3, RG3).

RESULTS

Overall, 31,724,381 ICSRs were identified in VigiBase and 167,282 (0.5%) were related to study drugs; the remaining reports were considered as RG1. Stratifying all biologic-related ICSRs by therapeutic indication, around 29.4% (n = 48,440) concerned asthma use; omalizumab was mainly indicated as the suspected drug (n = 20,501), followed by dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and reslizumab. Most asthma ICSRs concerned adults (57%) and women (64.1%). Asthma biologics showed a higher frequency of serious suspected ADR reporting than RG1 (41.3% vs 32.3%). The most reported suspected ADRs included asthma, dyspnea, product use issue, drug ineffective, cough, headache, fatigue and wheezing. Asthma biologics were disproportionally associated with several unknown or less documented adverse events, such as malignancies, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with omalizumab; alopecia and lichen planus with dupilumab; alopecia and herpes infections with mepolizumab; alopecia, herpes zoster and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis related to benralizumab; and alopecia with reslizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequently reported suspected ADRs of asthma biologics in VigiBase confirmed the presence of well-known adverse effects such as general disorders, injection-site reactions, nasopharyngitis, headache and hypersensitivity, while some others (e.g. asthma reactivation or therapeutic failure) could be ascribed to the indication of use. Moreover, the analysis of signals of disproportionate reporting suggests the presence of malignancies, effects on the cardiovascular system, alopecia and autoimmune conditions, requiring further assessment and investigation.

Total eosinophil count as a biomarker for therapeutic effects of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis over 48 weeks

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease characterized by type 2-skewed immune responses, and significantly influenced by cytokines dependent on Janus kinases (JAKs). Upadacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, is effective for moderate-to-severe AD. This study aims to identify biomarkers that reflect long-term therapeutic effects of upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg.

Methods

A retrospective study from August 2021 to July 2023 included 213 AD patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg and 70 AD patients with 30 mg. We analyzed eczema area and severity index (EASI), peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS), serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and total eosinophil count (TEC) at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 of treatment.

Results

Both treatments with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg significantly reduced EASI and PP-NRS scores over week 4 to 48 compared to baseline. Upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg treatment significantly decreased TEC compared to baseline through week 4 to 36 or week 4 to 48, respectively. The percent reduction of TEC correlated with those of EASI and PP-NRS through week 4 to 48 of treatment with upadacitinib 15 mg, or through week 12 to 48 with 30 mg, respectively. After adjusting for % reductions of other laboratory markers, the significance of correlations was preserved at weeks 36 and 48 of 15 mg treatment, while at weeks 4 and 36 of 30 mg treatment.

Conclusion

The % reduction of TEC correlated with those of EASI and PP-NRS during upadacitinib treatment, indicating its potential as a biomarker reflecting treatment responses to upadacitinib in AD patients. However, the variability of significant correlation during treatment indicates that further inspection is needed for its usefulness in monitoring responses to upadacitinib treatment for AD.

[Eosinophils in otorhinolaryngology: friend or foe?]

This article summarizes the essential aspects of current knowledge about eosinophils, classifies eosinophilia in terms of the dimensions healthy or harmful reaction, takes a specific look at eosinophils in the field of otorhinolaryngology, and gives recommendations for diagnostic workup and therapeutic intervention in case of proven eosinophilia, particularly as an adverse drug reaction. The thoughts are inspired by communications at the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia, Bulgaria, 2023.

Real-world reported adverse events related to systemic immunomodulating therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis: Results from the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the (long-term) safety of systemic immunomodulating therapies in atopic dermatitis (AD) generated by real-world data is sparse.

OBJECTIVES

To describe real-world reported adverse drug reactions (AEs) related to systemic immunomodulating therapy in patients with AD and to compare the incidence rates of AEs with the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs).

METHODS

We conducted an observational prospective multi-centre cohort study, using the TREAT NL registry. All severe AEs, AEs of special interest and serious AEs in adult and paediatric patients on systemic immunomodulating treatment (ciclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, dupilumab, tralokinumab, baricitinib and upadacitinib) were assessed. Incidences rates of all (potentially) drug-related AEs were standardized in patient years and compared to the cumulative incidences in the associated SmPCs.

RESULTS

We collected 422 patient years of safety data from 266 patients, of whom 129 (48.5%) reported a total of 224 (potentially) drug-related AEs. Compared to dupilumab's SmPC, higher incidence rates were found for four AEs (reported ≥5 times): eosinophilia, blepharitis, dry eyes and head and neck erythema (i.e. dupilumab facial redness). A higher incidence rate of fatigue was found in patients on oral methotrexate in our cohort compared to the SmPC. Two new drug-related AEs (reported ≥5 times) were found in patients on dupilumab, including non-infectious conjunctivitis and meibomian gland dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world reported AEs captured in AD patient registries can add information on the estimated incidence of AEs and benefit clinical decision aids. Future studies using data derived from the TREAT NL registry combined with data from other registries within the TREAT Registry Taskforce will provide more information on (rare) AEs associated with immunomodulating therapy in AD patients.

Pulmonology for the rhinologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The upper and lower airways are inter-related despite serving different functions and can no longer be considered separately. Rhinologists are becoming increasingly aware of the role the lower airway plays in optimizing outcomes for their patients. This review highlights recent developments in pulmonology that impact rhinologic conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The unified airway concept now supports the multidisciplinary management of respiratory and rhinologic pathologies. Biomarkers, biologics and the concept of treatable traits have permitted the development of personalized and precise treatment of the entire respiratory tract. The concept of corticosteroid stewardship, the introduction of steroid sparing agents for the treatment of respiratory diseases and the development of biomarkers, now forces us to be more considerate and precise with oral corticosteroid (OCS) prescribing and to consider reduction regimens. Finally, current research on climate change and vaping will allow us to better educate and prepare our patients to improve adherence and avoid exacerbations to maintain optimal global respiratory health.

SUMMARY

The inter-relatedness of the upper and lower airway has encouraged a multidisciplinary focus in respiratory medicine. More research is required to improve the precision respiratory medicine model, particularly in the realm of biomarkers and endotyping. These developments must also consider the impact of climate change, pollution and toxins for us to provide optimum care for our patients.

Safety of dupilumab in T2 airways conditions: focus on eosinophilia across trials and real-life evidence

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit, effectively blocks both IL-4 and IL-13 mediated pathways. Its introduction has represented a significant advancement in the treatment of severe asthma and other Type 2 (T2) conditions, including nasal polyps, atopic dermatitis, and eosinophilic esophagitis. To date, Dupilumab has demonstrated optimal efficacy and safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

The safety profile of dupilumab has been extensively studied, especially for its effects on blood eosinophil count. Transient eosinophil increase during treatment is typically insignificant from a clinical point of view and related to its mechanism of action. Rare cases of hyper-eosinophilia associated with clinical conditions like eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) have been reported. Those cases are often related to the drug's steroid-sparing effect or the natural trajectory of the underlying disease rather than a direct cause-effect relationship with dupilumab.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of hyper-eosinophilia during dupilumab treatment requires comprehensive diagnostic work-up and strict follow-up monitoring for early detection of systemic disease progression in order to avoid unnecessary discontinuation of an effective treatment. This approach highlights the importance of a personalized treatment.

Real-world effectiveness and predictors of super-responders to dupilumab in a Chinese uncontrolled asthma cohort

Background: Dupilumab has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. However, the efficacy of dupilumab in the real world and the prediction of treatment response have not been well studied in patients with asthma. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of dupilumab and explore predictors of super-responders in a Chinese retrospective cohort. Methods: From January 2021 through December 2022, the patients with uncontrolled asthma who were treated with dupilumab for 4 months were included. Symptom control, type 2 inflammatory biomarkers, and lung function were collected at baseline and follow-up for efficacy assessment. Super-responders were defined as exacerbation-free, off maintenance of oral corticosteroids (mOCS), and with a score of the five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) of <0.5. The uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were used to construct predictive models for super-responders based on baseline features. Results: A total of 53 patients were included. After 4 months treatment, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) ACQ-5 score decreased from 1.8 (1.6-2.4) to 0.4 (0.2-0.8) (p < 0.001), the median (IQR) number of exacerbations, from 0.0 (0.0-1.0) to 0.0 (0.0-0.0) (p = 0.005). The median (IQR) dose of mOCS (prednisone equivalent) decreased from 15.0 mg/day (8.8-22.5 mg/day) to 2.5 mg/day (0.0-10.0 mg/day) (p = 0.008) in nine patients who were receiving mOCS. All efficacy assessment parameters, including sputum eosinophil were significantly improved, while blood eosinophil count did not decline (530 cells/mm³ [300-815 cells/mm³] versus 560 cells/mm³ [220-938 cells/mm³], p = 0.710). After taking dupilumab, 25 of 53 patients (47.2%) achieved a super-response. The age of onset < 42 years (odds ratio [OR] 7.471 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.286-43.394) and the baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) of 25-50 ppb (OR 35.038 [95% CI, 3.104-395.553]) predicted super-responders, which showed a C-index of 0.822 (95% CI, 0.697-0.947). Conclusion: Dupilumab significantly improved symptom control, type 2 inflammatory markers, and lung function in Chinese patients with uncontrolled asthma. Airway eosinophils, rather than blood eosinophils, can be a reliable indicator of therapeutic efficacy. The early-onset asthma as well as the medium-high level of baseline FeNO contributed to the prediction of super-responders.

A Review of Dupilumab-Induced Adverse Events to Dermatologists and the Potential Pathogenesis in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 antibody, is approved for use in many type 2 inflammatory diseases, including atopic dermatitis. It is generally well tolerated with no need of routine laboratory monitoring. However, several adverse events have been reported during real-world practice and in pivotal trials. We conducted a systematic literature research of the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases to identify articles recording the clinical manifestation and potential pathogenesis of these adverse events with interests (AEIs) to dermatologists. In total, 547 cases from 134 studies have developed 39 AEIs 1 day to 2.5 years after dupilumab treatment. The most common AEIs are facial and neck dermatitis (299 cases), psoriasis (70 cases), arthralgia (56 cases), alopecia (21 cases), cutaneous T cell lymphoma (19 cases), severe ocular diseases (19 cases), and drug eruption (6 cases). Most of the AEIs recorded in this review resolved or improved after dupilumab discontinuation or the addition of another treatment, whereas 3 of the cases died of severe AEI. The potential pathogenesis included T help type 1 (Th1)/T help type 2 (Th2) imbalance, Th2/T help type 17 (Th17) imbalance, immune reconstitution, hypersensitivity reaction, transient hypereosinophilia related, and Th1 suppression. Clinicians should be alert of these AEIs for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Dupilumab for relapsing or refractory sinonasal and/or asthma manifestations in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a European retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is often associated with glucocorticoid-dependent asthma and/or ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations. When immunosuppressants and/or mepolizumab are ineffective, dupilumab could be an option. We describe the safety and efficacy of off-label use of dupilumab in relapsing and/or refractory EGPA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted an observational multicentre study of EGPA patients treated with dupilumab. Complete response was defined by Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)=0 and prednisone dose ≤4 mg/day, and partial response by BVAS=0 and prednisone dose >4 mg/day. Eosinophilia was defined as an eosinophil count >500/mm3.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included. The primary indication for dupilumab was disabling ENT symptoms in 92%. After a median follow-up of 13.1 months, 18 patients (35%) reported adverse events (AEs), including two serious AEs. Eosinophilia was reported in 34 patients (67%), with a peak of 2195/mm3 (IQR 1268-4501) occurring at 13 weeks (IQR 4-36) and was associated with relapse in 41%. Twenty-one patients (41%) achieved a complete response and 12 (24%) a partial response. Sixteen (31%) patients experienced an EGPA relapse while on dupilumab, which was associated with blood eosinophilia in 14/16 (88%) patients. The median eosinophil count at the start of dupilumab was significantly lower in relapsers than in non-relapsers, as was the median time between stopping anti-IL-5/IL-5R and switching to dupilumab.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that dupilumab may be effective in treating patients with EGPA-related ENT manifestations. However, EGPA flares occurred in one-third of patients and were preceded by eosinophilia in 88%, suggesting that caution is required.

Eosinophils-from cradle to grave: An EAACI task force paper on new molecular insights and clinical functions of eosinophils and the clinical effects of targeted eosinophil depletion

Over the past years, eosinophils have become a focus of scientific interest, especially in the context of their recently uncovered functions (e.g. antiviral, anti-inflammatory, regulatory). These versatile cells display both beneficial and detrimental activities under various physiological and pathological conditions. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases which can be classified into primary (clonal) and secondary (reactive) disorders and idiopathic (hyper)eosinophilic syndromes. Depending on the biological specimen, the eosinophil count in different body compartments may serve as a biomarker reflecting the underlying pathophysiology and/or activity of distinct diseases and as a therapy-driving (predictive) and monitoring tool. Personalized selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy directly or indirectly targeting the increased number and/or activity of eosinophils should be based on the understanding of eosinophil homeostasis including their interactions with other immune and non-immune cells within different body compartments. Hence, restoring as well as maintaining homeostasis within an individual's eosinophil pool is a goal of both specific and non-specific eosinophil-targeting therapies. Despite the overall favourable safety profile of the currently available anti-eosinophil biologics, the effect of eosinophil depletion should be monitored from the perspective of possible unwanted consequences.

Early increase in eosinophil count may predict long-term hypereosinophilia during dupilumab treatment: a 2-year observational study

KEY POINTS

In a limited subset of patients, dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia is persistent. Two-month follow-up eosinophil count may predict long-lasting hypereosinophilia.

Uveitis and hypereosinophilia associated with dupilumab in an atopic dermatitis patient

Uveitis is a rare adverse event of dupilumab, that typically affects both eyes and often leads to discontinuation of therapy. In this article, we report a case of a 28-year-old female with atopic dermatitis who developed new-onset iridocyclitis, a form of uveitis, in her left eye 2 weeks after starting dupilumab treatment, which improved after reducing the dose, without discontinuing dupilumab. The patient also experienced asymptomatic hypereosinophilia, possibly related to dupilumab, which was gradually relieved without discontinuation. With the readers, we share our experience in managing uveitis and hypereosinophilia associated with dupilumab, which may be helpful in managing these conditions and avoiding discontinuation of dupilumab.

ANCA-negative EGPA: only eosinophils without vasculitis? Insights from anti-T2 biologics

The pathogenic role of p-ANCA in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a long-standing matter of debate. In this work, we report our real-life experience with EGPA patients, treated with biologics targeting type 2 (T2)-eosinophilic inflammation (Mepolizumab, Benralizumab, Dupilumab). Interestingly, we observed EGPA extrarespiratory relapses only in p-ANCA-positive patients (2/5 cutaneous vasculitis, 3/5 constitutional symptoms), with new rise of p-ANCA and normal eosinophil blood count. Notably, revising our cohort with the new ACR 2022 criteria, these five patients were the only ones to satisfy the entry criterion of vasculitis' defined diagnosis at disease onset. These observations may suggest that biologics, selectively turning off T2 inflammation, may have unmasked p-ANCA exclusive role in the pathogenesis of vasculitis in EGPA. Therefore, we raise the question whether EGPA vasculitis exists only in p-ANCA-positive patients, and whether p-ANCA-negative disease is "only eosinophils without vasculitis".

Combination of Biological Therapy in Severe Asthma: Where We Are?

Biological drugs have revolutionized the management of severe asthma. However, a variable number of patients remain uncontrolled or only partially controlled even after the appropriate administration of a biologic agent. The combination of two biologics may target different inflammatory pathways, and it has been used in patients suffering from uncontrolled severe asthma with evidence of both allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes or severe asthma and type2 comorbidities. Combination therapy has also been used to handle anti-IL4/13R induced hypereosinophilia. There is insufficient data on combining biologics for the treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma and type 2 comorbidities, also because of the high cost, and currently no guideline recommends dual biologic therapy. A systematic search was performed using the Medline and Scopus databases. Published data on concurrent administration of two biological drugs in severe, uncontrolled asthma patients has been reported in 28 real-world studies and 1 clinical trial. Data extraction was followed by a descriptive and narrative synthesis of the findings. Future studies should be conducted to further assess the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of this therapeutic strategy.

Dupilumab-induced eosinophilia in patients with diffuse type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a monoclonal anti-IL-4Rα antibody, is approved for several type 2 mediated inflammatory diseases like asthma, atopic dermatitis, and diffuse type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Clinical studies had reported a transient increase in blood eosinophils during dupilumab therapy. This study aimed to assess the impact of elevated blood eosinophils on clinical outcome and to investigate the cause of high blood eosinophil levels under dupilumab therapy.

METHODS

Patients suffering from diffuse type 2 CRS treated with dupilumab were examined on days 0, 28, 90, and 180 after therapy start. Sino-Nasal-Outcome-Test Score (SNOT-22), Total Nasal Polyp Score (TNPS), and blood samples were collected. Cytokine measurements and proteomics analysis were conducted. Flow cytometry analysis measured receptor expression on eosinophils.

RESULTS

Sixty-eighty patients were included. Baseline eosinophilia ≥0.3G/L was observed in 63.2% of patients, and in 30.9% of patients, eosinophils increased by ≥0.5G/L under dupilumab. Subjects with eosinophilia ≥0.3G/L at baseline had the best SNOT-22 mean change compared to no eosinophilia. Eosinophil elevation during dupilumab therapy had no impact on clinical scores. The eosinophil adhesion molecule VCAM-1 decreased significantly during therapy in all patients. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 was significantly down- and IL-4 upregulated in subjects with eosinophil increase.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that increased eosinophils in type 2 CRS are associated with a good clinical response to dupilumab. Patients with elevated IL-4 at baseline developed dupilumab-induced transient eosinophilia. We identified the downregulation of VCAM-1 and surface markers CD49d and CXCR4 on eosinophils as possible explanations of dupilumab-induced eosinophilia.

Two-year results of tapered dupilumab for CRSwNP demonstrates enduring efficacy established in the first 6 months

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is an anti-T2-inflammatory biological registered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), indicated by integrated CRS-care pathways when optimal medico-surgical treatment yields insufficient CRS control. This study aims to evaluate long-term results with focus on established therapeutic efficacy while tapering dupilumab.

METHODS

Real-life, prospective observational cohort study in single tertiary referral center with add-on dupilumab as primary biological treatment in adult (≥18 years) biological-naïve CRSwNP patients per the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS)2020-indication with a 2-year follow-up. Tapering (increasing interdose interval) applied every 24 weeks, conditional to sufficient treatment response and CRS control.

RESULTS

Mean scores (s.d.) of all co-primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline ( 228) to the 48 ( 214) and 96-weeks ( 99) timepoints: Nasal Polyp Score (0-8) improved from 5,3 (1,9) to 1,4 (1,8) and 1,3 (1,7); SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 (0-110) improved from 53,6 (19,6) to 20,2 (15,4) and 21,2 (15,6); Sniffin'Sticks-12 identification test (0-12; 0-6 anosmia, 7-10 hyposmia, 11-12 normosmia) improved from 3,7 (2,4) to 7,7 (2,9) and 7,3 (3,04); Asthma Control Test (5-25; >19 indicating well-controlled asthma) improved from 18,5 (4,8) to 21,8 (3,8) and 21,4 (3,9). Tapering was feasible in 79,5% of the patients at the 24-weeks timepoint, and in 93,7% and 95,8% at the 48- and 96-weeks timepoints, respectively. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant alterations of individual co-primary outcome mean-scores from 24 weeks onward.

CONCLUSION

This first long-term real-life prospective observational cohort study shows high therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab for severe CRswNP in the first 2 years. Therapeutic efficacy is principally established within 24 weeks and endures while tapering dupilumab conditional to treatment response and CRS control.

Targeting IL-4 and IL-13 Receptors on Eosinophils in CRSwNP Patients: The Clinical Efficacy of Dupilumab

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory disease linked to type 2 inflammation. Several biologics have demonstrated therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology in which IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 represent the major cytokines involved in the control of eosinophilic respiratory inflammation. 25% of CRSwNP patients relapse after the use of oral glucocorticoids or after surgery and often require several surgeries during their lifetime. In our study we enrolled 14 patients, 11 male and 3 female. The inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years; confirmed diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with severe nasal polyposis; disease severity with NPS Nasal Polyposis Endoscopic Score total score ≥ 5 and/or SNOT-22 ≥ 50; previous treatment failure due to lack of efficacy or discontinuation of systemic corticosteroid therapy and/or non-response or recurrence following surgery. The results presented in this study showed the ability of Dupilumab to improve all the parameters analysed. In particular, statistically significant data were obtained for NPS, SNOT-22, NRS, and IgE in patients exposed to Dupilumab treatment for 24 weeks, highlighting the ability of Dupilumab to produce clinical benefit in CRWwNP patients. In light of these data, the administration of dupilumab every two weeks represents a valid clinical strategy that ENT specialists can adopt for the treatment of adults with inadequately controlled CRSwNP.