1
|
Newman-Taylor K, Bentall R. Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: The end of the line or time for a new approach? Psychol Psychother 2024; 97:4-18. [PMID: 37804105 DOI: 10.1111/papt.12498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Following its introduction in the early 1990s, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) has been evaluated in a large number of clinical trials and is now established as a recommended treatment in the UK National Health Service and elsewhere in the world. Meta-analyses, however, indicate modest effects compared to treatment as usual or comparison therapies such as supportive counselling. Here, we seek to identify factors impacting the effectiveness of CBTp, and avenues for future psychotherapy research that may improve outcomes. METHOD We outline two recent umbrella reviews and discuss factors likely to impact the effectiveness of CBTp. RESULTS Modest effect sizes from meta-analyses mask heterogeneous outcomes, with some people benefiting and others possibly being harmed by therapy. Common factors such as the therapeutic alliance play an important role in determining outcomes but have been largely neglected by CBTp researchers. There is also the promise of improving outcomes by identifying and targeting the psychological mechanisms that either maintain psychotic symptoms (e.g. worry) or are causally implicated (e.g. trauma). CONCLUSIONS It is unlikely that everyone with psychosis will be equally responsive to the same therapeutic protocols. We need a new, personalised psychotherapy approach to CBTp research and practice, and can learn from research for anxiety and depression examining predictors of therapeutic response to inform treatment decisions. Precision psychological therapies informed by a combination of individual characteristics, common factors and a focus on specific mechanisms will require new research strategies and are likely to lead to improved outcomes for people with psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Newman-Taylor
- Psychology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Psychology Department, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard Bentall
- Psychology Department, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bennett ME, Brown CH, Fang LJ, Blanchard JJ. Increasing social and community participation in veterans living with schizophrenia: A treatment outcome study. Schizophr Res 2023; 252:262-270. [PMID: 36682317 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
People living with schizophrenia often face challenges engaging in social and community activities. A critical barrier is negative symptoms that reflect diminished feelings and thoughts that support social interaction. Several years ago, we began a process of specifying an intervention for individuals with schizophrenia and clinically meaningful negative symptoms that could be delivered in an integrated fashion with mental health services offered in VA medical centers with the primary focus of improving social and community engagement. In the present study, we examined the impact of a multi-component intervention to improve social and community participation in a group of Veterans living with schizophrenia and negative symptoms. We compared an intervention called Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences (EnCoRE) - a 12-week program of individual and group meetings that support learning and implementing skills with the goal of helping participants increase engagement in personally-relevant social and community activities - to an active wellness education control condition. Participants in both conditions attended on average of at least half of the groups that were offered, indicating that many individuals living with negative symptoms are willing to participate in an intervention to improve social and community participation. Although there were no significant differences on the two primary outcomes, those in EnCoRE showed better social and general functioning at post treatment and improved social motivational negative symptoms and decreases in perceived limitations at a 3-month follow-up. EnCoRE may be especially beneficial for participants who endorsed more dysfunctional attitudes about their abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie E Bennett
- VA Capital Healthcare Network Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System (Baltimore Annex), 209 West Fayette Street, Baltimore, MD 20210, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard Street, 5(th) Floor, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
| | - Clayton H Brown
- VA Capital Healthcare Network Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System (Baltimore Annex), 209 West Fayette Street, Baltimore, MD 20210, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 660 W. Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
| | - Li Juan Fang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard Street, 5(th) Floor, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.
| | - Jack J Blanchard
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Biology/Psychology Building, 4094 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20742, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Formulating psychosis: a thematic analysis of CBTp trainees’ experiences. COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x22000459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The NICE guidance states that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) should now be offered to everyone with psychosis in the UK. This has rightly resulted in an increased demand for adherent therapy from qualified clinicians. Individualised formulation is a key component of CBT for psychosis, yet many trainees struggle to make sense of and apply the theoretical models on which these are based. This study explored trainee and recently qualified therapists’ experience of formulating CBT for psychosis, to help us understand how best to guide training and clinical practice. We ran focus groups with trainees who were completing, or had recently completed, postgraduate training in CBT for psychosis. We then analysed verbatim transcripts of the semi-structured interviews. and completed a thematic analysis of the data using inductive open coding. Three over-arching themes were generated: (1) purpose of formulation, (2) formulation in practice, and (3) (reflection on) learning to formulate. Training programmes and clinical supervisors should focus on fostering trainees’ and newly qualified therapists’ ability to develop simple, targeted formulations. These will draw on maintenance and developmental models of psychosis, depending on the person’s needs and goals. Opportunities for procedural learning are likely to improve skilful formulation, and use as the basis for therapeutic change.
Key learning aims
(1)
CBT for psychosis is best guided by individualised formulation.
(2)
The range and complexity of current theoretical models is challenging.
(3)
A qualitative analysis of trainee and recently qualified therapists’ experiences highlights means of facilitating understanding and application of these models.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hardy A, Good S, Dix J, Longden E. "It hurt but it helped": A mixed methods audit of the implementation of trauma- focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:946615. [PMID: 36311513 PMCID: PMC9606605 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.946615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence supports the safety, acceptability, and efficacy of trauma therapies for people experiencing post-traumatic stress and psychosis, despite common concerns about iatrogenic harm when processing trauma memories for this population. However, to date there have been no mixed-method studies examining whether trauma-focused therapy can be implemented in routine care. This study reports an audit of a post-traumatic stress in psychosis clinic based in an inner-city trust in the U.K. National Health Service. MATERIALS AND METHODS People under the care of psychosis community mental health teams with a significant history of past trauma were referred to the clinic by their multidisciplinary clinicians. Referral outcomes were recorded, including the proportion of people for whom trauma-focused cognitive-behavior therapy for psychosis was indicated. Post-traumatic stress symptoms were assessed pre- and post-therapy for clinically significant change on the Post-traumatic Stress Checklist (version 4) and Post-traumatic Stress Checklist (version 5). A subgroup of service users was also interviewed about their experience of therapy, with transcripts analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Seventy one service-users were referred to the clinic between 2014 and 2018, of which 51 (71.8%) attended an assessment. Of these, 20 (39.2%) were identified as having clinically significant PTSD symptoms with re-experiencing and were offered trauma-focused cognitive-behavior therapy for psychosis. Sixteen (80%) accepted and completed therapy, with no dropouts, and received a mean of 17.54 sessions (SD = 17.60, range = 12-91). There were no serious adverse events related to therapy. Clinically significant change was observed in 68.8% (n = 11) of the therapy group and post-therapy six people (37.5%) no longer met the threshold for clinically significant PTSD. Six service users completed an interview about their therapy experiences with findings organized within four main themes and associated subthemes: (1) Perseverance, (2) Establishing safety, (3) The challenges of therapy, and (4) Rebuilding one's life after trauma. CONCLUSION Trauma-focused cognitive-behavior therapy for psychosis can be safe, acceptable, and effective when implemented in routine care. Lived experience perspectives highlight the emotional demands of therapy and long-term impact of trauma, thus underscoring the necessity of sufficient support and continuity of care both during and after therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Hardy
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Good
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jayde Dix
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eleanor Longden
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Campodonico C, Berry K, Haddock G, Varese F. Protective Factors Associated With Post-traumatic Outcomes in Individuals With Experiences of Psychosis. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:735870. [PMID: 34912247 PMCID: PMC8666594 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.735870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Trauma and trauma-specific mental health difficulties (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder) are highly prevalent in people with psychosis. However, not everyone develops post-traumatic symptoms, and some people even experience post-traumatic growth (PTG) following trauma. It is important to identify which protective factors are associated with less severe trauma symptoms and/or positive outcomes to inform the development and implementation of interventions fostering these variables. Eighty-five patients with experiences of psychosis took part in a cross-sectional study. They were administered questionnaires measuring exposure to traumatic events, symptoms of PTSD and complex PTSD and potential protective factors assumed to be associated with lower vulnerability for post-traumatic symptoms and higher post-traumatic growth (trait resilience, secure attachment, social support, adaptive coping, optimism, general self-efficacy). Multiple hierarchical regression showed that some of these protective factors, in particular optimism, were associated with lower post-traumatic symptoms, explaining 21% of the variance in complex PTSD symptoms and 16% of the variance in PTSD symptoms. However, the hypothesized protective factors, in particular resilience and adaptive coping, explained a considerably larger proportion of variance in PTG (44%). Our results suggest that whilst these variables provide only moderate protection from the vulnerability to experience post-traumatic stress, they may play an important role in allowing people to find meaning despite multiple traumas and subsequently lead more fulfilling lives. Therapies targeting the emotional and psychological consequences of trauma in people with psychosis might benefit from the integration of intervention strategies to enhance these additional psychological protective factors, which in turn may lead to positive treatment outcomes beyond the mere reduction of post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Campodonico
- School of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Berry
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Haddock
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Varese
- Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A qualitative systematic review of Early Intervention in Psychosis service user perspectives regarding valued aspects of treatment with a focus on cognitive behavioural therapy. COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x2100026x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Despite the increasing evidence base and focus given to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services, qualitative literature remains sparse, particularly in relation to the ‘At Risk Mental State’ (ARMS) group. Although research has looked to service user experience within EIP, data have not been collated to understand valued aspects of treatment across both EIP groups: first episode psychosis (FEP) and ARMS, particularly regarding cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT).
Aims:
To conduct a systematic review of qualitative literature to examine service user perspectives on support provided in EIP treatment with a focus on CBT.
Method:
This was a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Nine studies were included in the analysis identified through a systematic database search and citation tracking. Studies were critically appraised using the critical appraisal skills programme tool.
Results:
Nine studies were identified for inclusion. Six analytical themes and 20 descriptive categories were identified.
Conclusions:
User perspectives confirm previous findings highlighting importance of therapeutic relationships for treatment success. Normalisation, learning and understanding were valued across both groups, which increased coping, and can be facilitated throughout the EIP journey. Harnessing the support of those involved in users’ care and understanding these relationships further enhances interventions utilised. Understanding the stage the individual is at regarding their experiences is essential in relation to targeting support. Transdiagnostic aspects of CBT were valued across both groups. ARMS referred to more specific strategies and there were some differences regarding coping styles and flexibility preferences; however, this may be due to group differences in problem trajectory and care provision.
Collapse
|
7
|
Longden E, Corstens D, Morrison AP, Larkin A, Murphy E, Holden N, Steele A, Branitsky A, Bowe S. A treatment protocol to guide the delivery of dialogical engagement with auditory hallucinations: Experience from the Talking With Voices pilot trial. Psychol Psychother 2021; 94:558-572. [PMID: 33629816 DOI: 10.1111/papt.12331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present a treatment protocol for delivering Talking With Voices, a novel intervention for people with psychosis that involves dialogical engagement with auditory hallucinations. METHOD This paper presents a manualized approach to therapy employed in the Talking With Voices trial, a feasibility and acceptability randomized control trial of 50 adult participants. A rationale for following a treatment manual is provided, followed by the theoretical underpinnings of the intervention and its principles and values, including the main tenet that voices can often be understood as dissociated parts of the self which serve a protective function by indicating social-emotional vulnerabilities. The four therapy phases for improving the relationship between the voice-hearer and their voices are outlined: (1) engagement and psychoeducation, (2) creating a formulation, (3) dialoguing with voices, and (4) consolidating outcomes, including key milestones at each phase. Implementation issues are discussed, as well as recommendations for best practice and future research. RESULTS The Talking With Voices treatment protocol indicates that it is feasible to manualize a dissociation-based approach to support service users who are distressed by hearing voices. CONCLUSION For some individuals, it is possible to engage in productive dialogue with even extremely hostile or distressing voices. Developing coping strategies, creating a formulation, and ultimately establishing a dialogue with voices has the potential to improve the relationship between voice(s) and voice-hearer. Further research is now required to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy. PRACTITIONER POINTS It is feasible to integrate a dissociation model of voice-hearing within a psychological intervention for people with psychosis. Combining psychosocial education, formulation and direct dialogue can be used to facilitate a more peaceful relationship between clients and their voices. Practitioners trained in other therapeutic modalities can draw on existing transferrable skills to dialogue with their clients' voices. The input of those with lived experience of mental health difficulties has an important role in guiding treatment design and delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Longden
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.,Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Dirk Corstens
- GGZ Noord-Holland Noord, Texel/den Helder, The Netherlands
| | - Anthony P Morrison
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Amanda Larkin
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Elizabeth Murphy
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Natasha Holden
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Ann Steele
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Alison Branitsky
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.,Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Samantha Bowe
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pipkin A, Hogg L, Armitage S. 'Someone on my level': A Meta-Ethnographic Review of Therapeutic Relationships in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis. Clin Psychol Psychother 2021; 28:1297-1313. [PMID: 33605515 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) demonstrates variable and at times mild to moderate effect sizes; thus, its therapeutic processes are important to explore. Establishing a secure therapeutic relationship is one such key process where barriers may exist, including those related to psychotic symptoms and associated stigma. This review synthesizes the available qualitative research pertaining to the experience of the therapeutic relationship from the perspective of those experiencing psychosis. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken using PRISMA guidelines. Search terms included variants of 'psychosis', 'therapy' and 'qualitative'. PsycInfo, CINAHL, EmBase, MedLine and Web of Science were searched, and reference lists were hand-scanned. Yardley's quality appraisal tool was utilized and Noblit and Hare's seven-stage process for conducting a meta-ethnographic review. A line-of-argument synthesis is presented. RESULTS Fourteen papers were identified using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve papers were deemed to have satisfactory quality. The line-of-argument synthesis used attachment theory to propose four semi-distinct stages to establishing a therapeutic relationship: beginning; safety, hope and trust; the practicalities of therapy; and branching out. Findings suggest that the therapist's persona and use of CBTp techniques such as collaboration and shared agency over the process were important in establishing for the patient a sense of self as normal, equal and worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS Attachment security may be an important strand of CBTp and warrants further research and clinical investigation as a process and an outcome. Future research can benefit from increased transparency regarding researcher positionality as a potential source of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair Pipkin
- Senior Clinical Psychologist, Northamptonshire Gender Service, Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northamptonshire, UK
| | - Lorna Hogg
- Deputy Director and Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Armitage
- Clinical Psychologist, Berkshire Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bracknell, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Böge K, Hahne I, Bergmann N, Wingenfeld K, Zierhut M, Thomas N, Ta TMT, Bajbouj M, Hahn E. Mindfulness-based group therapy for in-patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders - Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res 2021; 228:134-144. [PMID: 33434727 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A Growing body of literature indicates therapeutic effectiveness of mindfulness for mental disorders. Only few trials have been conducted with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), mostly in outpatient settings. Primary objective was to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of mindfulness-based group therapy (MBGT) for in-patients with SSD. METHODS A pre-registered randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess feasibility and acceptability of the MBGT. The primary outcome was mindfulness measured with the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). Secondary outcomes were rater-blinded positive- and negative symptoms, depression, social functioning, and self-reported mindfulness, depression, anxiety, psychological flexibility, quality of life, and medication regime at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up (Clinical Trails NCT03671005). RESULTS 40 participants received either treatment-as-usual (TAU; n=19) or (MBGT+TAU; n = 21) for four weeks. At post-intervention, protocol adherence was 95.2%, and retention rate was 95%. ANCOVA revealed significant improvements in the MBGT+TAU for the primary outcome SMQ as well as negative symptoms at post-intervention between groups. In exploratory analyses, secondary outcomes showed medium-to-large pre-to-post-intervention effects on mindfulness, positive-, negative-, and depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility, quality of life, and social functioning for MBGT+TAU and small-to-moderate changes on positive symptoms and social functioning for TAU. No serious adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS MBGT appears feasible and acceptable for in-patient settings, with high protocol adherence and retention rates. Preliminary findings highlight a proof of concept of MBGT and various improvements in clinical- and process dimensions. A fully powered trial is warranted to determine efficacy, cost-efficiency, and longitudinal changes based on these promising outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerem Böge
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Inge Hahne
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Niklas Bergmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Katja Wingenfeld
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Marco Zierhut
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Neil Thomas
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Thi Minh Tam Ta
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Malek Bajbouj
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| | - Eric Hahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Morrison AP, Pyle M, Byrne R, Broome M, Freeman D, Johns L, James A, Husain N, Whale R, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Hudson J, Peters S, Davies L, Bowe S, Smith J, Shiers D, Joyce E, Jones W, Hollis C, Maughan D. Psychological intervention, antipsychotic medication or a combined treatment for adolescents with a first episode of psychosis: the MAPS feasibility three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-124. [PMID: 33496261 PMCID: PMC7869006 DOI: 10.3310/hta25040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When psychosis emerges in young people there is a risk of poorer outcomes, and access to evidence-based treatments is paramount. The current evidence base is limited. Antipsychotic medications show only a small benefit over placebo, but young people experience more side effects than adults. There is sparse evidence for psychological intervention. Research is needed to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention versus antipsychotic medication versus a combined treatment for adolescents with psychosis. OBJECTIVES The objective of Managing Adolescent first-episode Psychosis: a feasibility Study (MAPS) was to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to answer the question of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these three treatment options. DESIGN This was a prospective, randomised, open-blinded, evaluation feasibility trial with a single blind. Participants were allocated 1 : 1 : 1 to receive antipsychotic medication, psychological intervention or a combination of both. A thematic qualitative study explored the acceptability and feasibility of the trial. SETTING Early intervention in psychosis services and child and adolescent mental health services in Manchester, Oxford, Lancashire, Sussex, Birmingham, Norfolk and Suffolk, and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear. PARTICIPANTS People aged 14-18 years experiencing a first episode of psychosis either with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis or meeting the entry criteria for early intervention in psychosis who had not received antipsychotic medication or psychological intervention within the last 3 months. INTERVENTIONS Psychological intervention involved up to 26 hours of cognitive-behavioural therapy and six family intervention sessions over 6 months, with up to four booster sessions. Antipsychotic medication was prescribed by the participant's psychiatrist in line with usual practice. Combined treatment was a combination of psychological intervention and antipsychotic medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was feasibility (recruitment, treatment adherence and retention). We used a three-stage progression criterion to determine feasibility. Secondary outcomes were psychosis symptoms, recovery, anxiety and depression, social and educational/occupational functioning, drug and alcohol use, health economics, adverse/metabolic side effects and adverse/serious adverse events. RESULTS We recruited 61 out of 90 (67.8%; amber zone) potential participants (psychological intervention, n = 18; antipsychotic medication, n = 22; combined treatment, n = 21). Retention to follow-up was 51 out of 61 participants (83.6%; green zone). In the psychological intervention arm and the combined treatment arm, 32 out of 39 (82.1%) participants received six or more sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy (green zone). In the combined treatment arm and the antipsychotic medication arm, 28 out of 43 (65.1%) participants received antipsychotic medication for 6 consecutive weeks (amber zone). There were no serious adverse events related to the trial and one related adverse event. Overall, the number of completed secondary outcome measures, including health economics, was small. LIMITATIONS Medication adherence was determined by clinician report, which can be biased. The response to secondary outcomes was low, including health economics. The small sample size obtained means that the study lacked statistical power and there will be considerable uncertainty regarding estimates of treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to conduct a trial comparing psychological intervention with antipsychotic medication and a combination treatment in young people with psychosis with some adaptations to the design, including adaptations to collection of health economic data to determine cost-effectiveness. FUTURE WORK An adequately powered definitive trial is required to provide robust evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80567433. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Morrison
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Melissa Pyle
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rory Byrne
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Broome
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nusrat Husain
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
| | - Richard Whale
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Davies
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Samantha Bowe
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jo Smith
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emmeline Joyce
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Wendy Jones
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Hollis
- National Institute for Health Research MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Daniel Maughan
- Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sivec HJ, Kreider VAL, Buzzelli C, Hrouda DR, Hricovec MM. Do Attitudes Matter? Evaluating the Influence of Training in CBT-p-Informed Strategies on Attitudes About Working with People Who Experience Psychosis. Community Ment Health J 2020; 56:1153-1159. [PMID: 32222848 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00611-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Attitudes of mental health providers are an important consideration in training and delivering evidence-based practices. Treatment approaches for individuals who experience schizophrenia consistently endorse the importance of a recovery perspective. At the same time, a review of the literature suggests that the attitudes of many providers and many policies of community health care settings serving individuals who experience schizophrenia, may not align with the recovery perspective. This brief report provides a summary of the program evaluation outcomes of a wide range of mental health providers who participated in a 2-day intensive training to learn strategies informed by Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis (CBT-p). This intensive training emphasizes engagement strategies and person-centered approaches inherent in the recovery perspective. Consistent with the aims of the training, participants' attitudes about working with people who experience psychosis appeared to be positively influenced by training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry J Sivec
- Department of Psychiatry, Best Practices in Schizophrenia Treatment (BeST) Center, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, P.O. Box 95, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA.
| | - Valerie A L Kreider
- Department of Psychiatry, Best Practices in Schizophrenia Treatment (BeST) Center, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, P.O. Box 95, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA
| | | | - Debra R Hrouda
- Department of Psychiatry, Best Practices in Schizophrenia Treatment (BeST) Center, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, P.O. Box 95, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morrison AP, Pyle M, Gumley A, Schwannauer M, Turkington D, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Hudson J, Bowe S, French P, Hutton P, Byrne R, Syrett S, Dudley R, McLeod HJ, Griffiths H, Barnes TR, Davies L, Shields G, Buck D, Tully S, Kingdon D. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: the FOCUS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-144. [PMID: 30806619 DOI: 10.3310/hta23070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clozapine (clozaril, Mylan Products Ltd) is a first-choice treatment for people with schizophrenia who have a poor response to standard antipsychotic medication. However, a significant number of patients who trial clozapine have an inadequate response and experience persistent symptoms, called clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). There is little evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological or psychological interventions for this population. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for people with CRS and to identify factors predicting outcome. DESIGN The Focusing on Clozapine Unresponsive Symptoms (FOCUS) trial was a parallel-group, randomised, outcome-blinded evaluation trial. Randomisation was undertaken using permuted blocks of random size via a web-based platform. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, using random-effects regression adjusted for site, age, sex and baseline symptoms. Cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out to determine whether or not CBT was associated with a greater number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and higher costs than treatment as usual (TAU). SETTING Secondary care mental health services in five cities in the UK. PARTICIPANTS People with CRS aged ≥ 16 years, with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and who are experiencing psychotic symptoms. INTERVENTIONS Individual CBT included up to 30 hours of therapy delivered over 9 months. The comparator was TAU, which included care co-ordination from secondary care mental health services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at 21 months and the primary secondary outcome was PANSS total score at the end of treatment (9 months post randomisation). The health benefit measure for the economic evaluation was the QALY, estimated from the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version (EQ-5D-5L), health status measure. Service use was measured to estimate costs. RESULTS Participants were allocated to CBT (n = 242) or TAU (n = 245). There was no significant difference between groups on the prespecified primary outcome [PANSS total score at 21 months was 0.89 points lower in the CBT arm than in the TAU arm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.32 to 1.55 points; p = 0.475], although PANSS total score at the end of treatment (9 months) was significantly lower in the CBT arm (-2.40 points, 95% CI -4.79 to -0.02 points; p = 0.049). CBT was associated with a net cost of £5378 (95% CI -£13,010 to £23,766) and a net QALY gain of 0.052 (95% CI 0.003 to 0.103 QALYs) compared with TAU. The cost-effectiveness acceptability analysis indicated a low likelihood that CBT was cost-effective, in the primary and sensitivity analyses (probability < 50%). In the CBT arm, 107 participants reported at least one adverse event (AE), whereas 104 participants in the TAU arm reported at least one AE (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.46; p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Cognitive-behavioural therapy for CRS was not superior to TAU on the primary outcome of total PANSS symptoms at 21 months, but was superior on total PANSS symptoms at 9 months (end of treatment). CBT was not found to be cost-effective in comparison with TAU. There was no suggestion that the addition of CBT to TAU caused adverse effects. Future work could investigate whether or not specific therapeutic techniques of CBT have value for some CRS individuals, how to identify those who may benefit and how to ensure that effects on symptoms can be sustained. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99672552. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 7. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Morrison
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Melissa Pyle
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Gumley
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Matthias Schwannauer
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Douglas Turkington
- Academic Psychiatry, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Graeme MacLennan
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Clinical Trials Unit, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Samantha Bowe
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK
| | - Paul French
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.,Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Hutton
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rory Byrne
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Suzy Syrett
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Robert Dudley
- School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hamish J McLeod
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Griffiths
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Linda Davies
- Division of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gemma Shields
- Division of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Deborah Buck
- Division of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Tully
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.,Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Kingdon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Academic Centre, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kopelovich SL, Strachan E, Sivec H, Kreider V. Stepped Care as an Implementation and Service Delivery Model for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis. Community Ment Health J 2019; 55:755-767. [PMID: 30623294 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-018-00365-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive behavioral therapy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders is an evidence-based treatment that is recommended by United States schizophrenia treatment guidelines. Based on recent estimates, only 0.3% of individuals with a primary psychotic disorder are able to access this treatment in the United States. Stepped care interventions have shown promise as an applied treatment delivery model in other settings and for other psychotherapeutic interventions. The current paper describes how the stepped care model can be applied to CBT for psychosis in the US to increase access to the intervention in community mental health settings by leveraging the multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Kopelovich
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359911, 98104, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Eric Strachan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359911, 98104, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Harry Sivec
- Best Practices in Schizophrenia Treatment (BeST) Center, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA
| | - Valerie Kreider
- Best Practices in Schizophrenia Treatment (BeST) Center, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ridenour JM, Hamm JA, Czaja M. A review of psychotherapeutic models and treatments for psychosis. PSYCHOSIS 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1615111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jay A. Hamm
- Eskenazi Health, Midtown Community Mental Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Meg Czaja
- Center for Motivation and Change, New Marlborough, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sheaves B, Peters E, Stahl D, Johns L. Changes in care costs associated with cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis delivered in routine clinical practice. J Ment Health 2019; 29:605-610. [PMID: 30902027 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: Schizophrenia spectrum disorders are long-term disabling conditions placing high economic demands on health services.Aim: To investigate whether cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), delivered in a specialist psychological therapies service, was associated with a reduction in intensive care costs.Methods: Days using inpatient care and out of hours crisis support were recorded (N = 69). Costs associated with high intensity care use in the 12 months pre-referral were compared to during, and 12 months following cessation of therapy.Results: Despite the majority of participants incurring £0 at all time periods, costs of intensive mental health care more than halved with CBTp delivery, with a significant decrease during therapy, and at trend level after therapy (p = 0.07). Post hoc analysis revealed that offsetting the cost of therapy for those who utilised intensive care services at any time point (N = 18) resulted in therapy being cost neutral during therapy and cost effective (at trend level) 12 months following cessation of therapy.Conclusion: CBTp may reduce costs associated with intensive psychiatric care, even in a population where the minority use these services. Investment in therapy may lead to both clinical and financial benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryony Sheaves
- Department of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.,Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,PICuP Clinic, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM), P079, Clinical Treatment Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emmanuelle Peters
- Department of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.,Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Department of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.,Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,PICuP Clinic, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM), P079, Clinical Treatment Centre, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Johns L, Jolley S, Garety P, Khondoker M, Fornells-Ambrojo M, Onwumere J, Peters E, Milosh C, Brabban A, Byrne M. Improving Access to psychological therapies for people with severe mental illness (IAPT-SMI): Lessons from the South London and Maudsley psychosis demonstration site. Behav Res Ther 2019; 116:104-110. [PMID: 30877877 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Implementation of evidence-based cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) remains low in routine services. The United Kingdom Improving Access to Psychological Therapies for people with Severe Mental Illness (IAPT-SMI) initiative aimed to address this issue. The project evaluated whether existing services could improve access to CBTp and demonstrate effectiveness using a systematic approach to therapy provision and outcome monitoring (in a similar way to the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) model for people with anxiety and depression). We report the clinical outcomes and key learning points from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust IAPT-SMI demonstration site for psychosis. Additional funding enabled increased therapist capacity within existing secondary care community mental health services. Self-reported wellbeing and psychotic symptom outcomes were assessed, alongside service use and social/occupational functioning. Accepted referrals/year increased by 89% (2011/12: n = 106/year; 2012-2015: n = 200/year); 90% engaged (attended ≥5 sessions) irrespective of ethnicity, age and gender. The assessment protocol proved feasible, and pre-post outcomes (n = 280) showed clinical improvements and reduced service use, with medium effects. We conclude that, with appropriate service structure, investment allocated specifically for competent therapy provision leads to increased and effective delivery of CBTp. Our framework is replicable in other settings and can inform the wider implementation of psychological therapies for psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Johns
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK; University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - Suzanne Jolley
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Philippa Garety
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM), UK
| | | | - Miriam Fornells-Ambrojo
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; University College London, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, UK
| | - Juliana Onwumere
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Emmanuelle Peters
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Craig Milosh
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Majella Byrne
- King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fredwall TE, Larsen IB. Textbook descriptions of people with psychosis – some ethical aspects. Nurs Ethics 2018; 26:1554-1565. [DOI: 10.1177/0969733017753742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Textbooks are central for the education of professionals in the health field and a resource for practitioners already in the field. Objectives: This article focuses on how 12 textbooks in psychiatric nursing and psychiatry, published in Norway between 1877 and 2012, describe and present people with psychosis. Research design: We used qualitative content analysis. Ethical considerations: The topic is published textbooks, made available to be read by students, teachers and professionals, and no ethical approval was required. Findings: The analysis shows that all 12 textbooks describe and present people who are considered as psychotic from a ‘perspective from above’. In this perspective, the readers are learning about psychosis in the professional’s language and from the author’s viewpoint. Most often the textbooks communicate a universal image of people with psychosis, a description that fits with the diagnostic criteria. The analysis also shows that two textbooks in psychiatric nursing combined this perspective with a ‘perspective from within’. Here, the readers are learning about psychosis from the patients’ own viewpoint. The authors communicate a personal, psychotic universe that differs from various people, even if they have the same diagnosis, and the descriptions are focusing on the patient as a whole person. Discussion and conclusion: Drawing partly on Rita Charon’s writings about narrative knowledge in the health field, and partly on insights from Martha Nussbaum and her concept of narrative imagination, we argue that mental health professionals need to learn about, understand and fathom what patients go through by reading, listening to and acknowledging the patients’ own stories and experiences. Cultivating the capacity for empathy and compassion are at the very heart of moral performance in the mental health field. A valuable moral resource in that regard is leading textbooks and how they describe and present people with severe mental illness.
Collapse
|
18
|
Keen N, Hunter ECM, Peters E. Integrated Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Post-traumatic Stress and Psychotic Symptoms: A Case-Series Study Using Imaginal Reprocessing Strategies. Front Psychiatry 2017; 8:92. [PMID: 28620323 PMCID: PMC5451497 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite high rates of trauma in individuals with psychotic symptoms, post-traumatic stress symptoms are frequently overlooked in clinical practice. There is also reluctance to treat post-traumatic symptoms in case the therapeutic procedure of reprocessing the trauma exacerbates psychotic symptoms. Recent evidence demonstrates that it is safe to use reprocessing strategies in this population. However, most published studies have been based on treating post-traumatic symptoms in isolation from psychotic symptoms. The aims of the current case series were to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of integrating cognitive-behavioural approaches for post-traumatic stress and psychotic symptoms into a single protocol. Nine participants reporting distressing psychotic and post-traumatic symptoms were recruited from a specialist psychological therapies service for psychosis. Clients were assessed at five time points (baseline, pre, mid, end of therapy, and at 6+ months of follow-up) by an independent assessor on measures of current symptoms of psychosis, post-traumatic stress, emotional problems, and well-being. Therapy was formulation based and individualised, depending on presenting symptoms and trauma type. It consisted of five broad, flexible phases, and included imaginal reprocessing strategies (reliving and/or rescripting). The intervention was well received, with positive post-therapy feedback and satisfaction ratings. Unusually for this population, no-one dropped out of therapy. Post therapy, all but one (88% of participants) achieved a reliable improvement compared to pre-therapy on at least one outcome measure: post-traumatic symptoms (63%), voices (25%), delusions (50%), depression (50%), anxiety (36%), and well-being (40%). Follow-up assessments were completed by 78% (n = 7) of whom 86% (n = 6) maintained at least one reliable improvement. Rates of improvements following therapy (average of 44% across measures post therapy; 32% at follow-up) were over twice those found during the waiting list period (19%). No participant indicated a reliable worsening of any symptoms during or after therapy. The study shows that an integrative therapy incorporating reprocessing strategies was an acceptable and feasible intervention for this small sample, with promising effectiveness. A randomised controlled trial is warranted to test the efficacy of the intervention for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Keen
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Psychological Interventions Clinic for outpatients with Psychosis (PICuP), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine C. M. Hunter
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Psychological Interventions Clinic for outpatients with Psychosis (PICuP), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuelle Peters
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Psychological Interventions Clinic for outpatients with Psychosis (PICuP), London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hardy A. Pathways from Trauma to Psychotic Experiences: A Theoretically Informed Model of Posttraumatic Stress in Psychosis. Front Psychol 2017; 8:697. [PMID: 28588514 PMCID: PMC5440889 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, empirical data and theoretical accounts relating to the relationship between childhood victimization and psychotic experiences have accumulated. Much of this work has focused on co-occurring Posttraumatic Stress Disorder or putative causal mechanisms in isolation from each other. The complexity of posttraumatic stress reactions experienced in psychosis remains poorly understood. This paper therefore attempts to synthesize the current evidence base into a theoretically informed, multifactorial model of posttraumatic stress in psychosis. Three trauma-related vulnerability factors are proposed to give rise to intrusions and to affect how people appraise and cope with them. First, understandable attempts to survive trauma become habitual ways of regulating emotion, manifesting in cognitive-affective, behavioral and interpersonal responses. Second, event memories, consisting of perceptual and episodic representations, are impacted by emotion experienced during trauma. Third, personal semantic memory, specifically appraisals of the self and others, are shaped by event memories. It is proposed these vulnerability factors have the potential to lead to two types of intrusions. The first type is anomalous experiences arising from emotion regulation and/or the generation of novel images derived from trauma memory. The second type is trauma memory intrusions reflecting, to varying degrees, the retrieval of perceptual, episodic and personal semantic representations. It is speculated trauma memory intrusions may be experienced on a continuum from contextualized to fragmented, depending on memory encoding and retrieval. Personal semantic memory will then impact on how intrusions are appraised, with habitual emotion regulation strategies influencing people's coping responses to these. Three vignettes are outlined to illustrate how the model accounts for different pathways between victimization and psychosis, and implications for therapy are considered. The model is the first to propose how emotion regulation and autobiographical memory may lead to a range of intrusive experiences in psychosis, and therefore attempts to explain the different phenomenological associations observed between trauma and intrusions. However, it includes a number of novel hypotheses that require empirical testing, which may lead to further refinement. It is anticipated the model will assist research and practice, in the hope of supporting people to manage the impact of victimization on their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Hardy
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College LondonLondon, UK
- Psychosis Clinical Academic Group, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morrison AP. A manualised treatment protocol to guide delivery of evidence-based cognitive therapy for people with distressing psychosis: learning from clinical trials. PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2017.1295098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P. Morrison
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester West NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|