Cost-effectiveness analysis of the human recombinant epidermal growth factor in the management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers

Comparative Efficacy of Regenerative Therapies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most dreaded complications of diabetes mellitus and is associated with a high risk of lower limb amputation and mortality. Because the efficacy of conventional treatments for DFUs is often limited, regenerative medicine therapy, such as growth factors and stem cells, may provide a solution to chronic wound healing. In this study, we compared several kinds of regenerative therapy for treating DFUs in terms of efficacy.

METHODS

We systemically searched relevant studies on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Randomized clinical trials on conventional treatment combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), epidermal growth factor (EGF), or stem cell therapy, compared with conventional treatment alone in patients with DFUs, were included in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 1454 patients from 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the network meta-analysis. In terms of the number of completely healed ulcers, no significant difference was noted between PRP, stem cell therapy, and EGF group. We also performed surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses to predict the rank of each intervention by the number of completely healed ulcers. The predicted ranking was as follows: stem cell, PRP, EGF, and the control group (conventional treatment alone). Furthermore, when we compared the mean of the wound healing time of DFUs among these four interventions, we found that the PRP group achieved significantly earlier ulcer healing than the stem cell, EGF, and control groups. No significant difference was observed in the time needed for wound healing between the stem cell and EGF groups. Funnel plot analysis demonstrated no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP combined with conventional treatment significantly accelerates wound healing for DFUs. The mean wound healing time was similar between the stem cell and EGF groups. However, additional reviews of rigorous, large, well-designed RCTs are warranted for further validation of our findings.

Improving Diabetic Wound-Healing Outcomes With Topical Growth Factor Therapies

CONTEXT

Diabetes mellitus is associated with morbid complications such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that may lead to amputations or mortality if not managed adequately.

OBJECTIVE

New adjunctive interventions to treat diabetic wounds include topical biologics and growth factors. This study aims to evaluate their efficacy in improving wound-healing outcomes and safety.

METHODS

Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were performed from inception to December 2022. Three independent researchers selected the studies. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a topical biologic growth factor-containing regimen to other biologics or standard of care (SOC) were included. This review followed PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias analysis was performed using the Jadad scale. Network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of biologic agent. Primary outcomes of interest were healing rate and time to wound closure. Secondary outcomes included wound infection, serious adverse events (AEs), and amputation rate.

RESULTS

Human umbilical cord (HUC) was associated with the highest cure, followed by recombinant human epidermal growth factor (hEGF). A significantly greater reduction in the time to cure DFUs was seen in HUC, hEGF, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). There was a significantly lower risk of AEs when platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was administered.

CONCLUSION

HUC, hEGF, and FGF are promising topical biologics with statistically significant primary outcomes compared to SOC, while PRP is effective in reducing ulcer-related AEs. HUC has been found to be the most effective in terms of cure rate and a reduction in time to cure.

Effectiveness of the Use of the Human Recombinant Epidermal Growth Factor in the Subsidized Regime vs The Contributive Regime in Patients with Venous Ulcers in Bogotá

Introduction

Vascular ulcers constitute a serious global public health problem, responsible for causing a significant social and economic impact due to their recurrent, disabling nature and the need for prolonged therapies to cure them.

Objective

To evaluate the use and efficacy of the rhEGF in the epithelialization of patients with a diagnosis of CEAP stage 6 venous insufficiency, in the two regimes of the health system in Colombia, the contributive (equivalent to a health system where citizens with payment capacity contribute a percentage of their salary) and the subsidized (equivalent to a health system where the state covers the vulnerable population and low socioeconomic level) versus the other treatments used.

Methodology

Observational, descriptive, retrospective, multicenter study, in which 105 medical records with 139 ulcers were reviewed, in 2 centers, one belonging to the subsidized system and the other to the contributive system in Colombia.

Results

The association with the epithelialization variable of the different treatment groups for ulcers according to the application of the mixed effect model test, for both regimes was for the Biologicals (EC 34.401/p = 0.000), Bioactive Agents (Hydrogels) (EC 24.735/p = 0.005) groups; for the rest of the treatment groups, the results were neither associated nor statistically significant.

Conclusion

Intra- and perilesional therapy with rhEGF expands the therapeutic spectrum in patients with venous ulcers, regardless of the type of health system in which it will be applied, shortening the healing time and reaching a possible therapeutic goal, which according to this study there is an association with epithelialization regardless of the regime applied.

Exploration of Nanosilver Calcium Alginate-Based Multifunctional Polymer Wafers for Wound Healing

Wound care is an integral part of effective recovery. However, its associated financial burden on national health services globally is significant enough to warrant further research and development in this field. In this study, multifunctional polymer wafers were prepared, which provide antibacterial activity, high cell viability, high swelling capacity and a thermally stable medium which can be used to facilitate the delivery of therapeutic agents. The purpose of this polymer wafer is to facilitate wound healing, by creating nanosilver particles within the polymer matrix itself via a one-pot synthesis method. This study compares the use of two synthetic agents in tandem, detailing the effects on the morphology and size of nanosilver particles. Two synthetic methods with varying parameters were tested, with one method using silver nitrate, calcium chloride and sodium alginate, whilst the other included aloe vera gel as an extra component, which serves as another reductant for nanosilver synthesis. Both methods generated thermally stable alginate matrices with high degrees of swelling capacities (400-900%) coupled with interstitially formed nanosilver of varying shapes and sizes. These matrices exhibited controlled nanosilver release rates which were able to elicit antibacterial activity against MRSA, whilst maintaining an average cell viability value of above 90%. Based on the results of this study, the multifunctional polymer wafers that were created set the standard for future polymeric devices for wound healing. These polymer wafers can then be further modified to suit specific types of wounds, thereby allowing this multifunctional polymer wafer to be applied to different wounding scenarios.

Prevalence of foot ulcers in diabetic patients in Punjab, Pakistan

Diabetes-related foot ulceration is prevalent and disabling, usually resulting in the amputation of the limb. The mortality rate is significant, and healed ulcers frequently reoccur. The main purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of foot ulcers and their associated factors among diabetic patients in Punjab, Pakistan. Multistage cluster random sampling procedure was applied to perform a cross-sectional analysis in the state of Punjab, Pakistan. A sample of 1,503 people with diabetes, including 504 men and 999 women, were selected from different clusters. Data were collected from December 18, 2018, to June 30, 2019. Individuals of 18 years or above were selected. A binary multiple logistic regression analysis was utilized to find the factors associated with a diabetic foot ulcer. The overall prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers was 16.83% (95% CI: 14.9-18.7%). The prevalence among the female was 17.52% (95% CI: 15.2-19.9%), and the male was 15.48% (95% CI: 12.3-18.6%). In rural areas, prevalence was 13.91% (95% CI: 10.6-17.2%) compared to the prevalence of 17.96% (95% CI: 15.7-20.2%) in the urban area. Individuals 75 years and above had the highest prevalence of 66.67% (95% CI: 51.9-81.5%). According to the income status, subjects with monthly income above Rs. 61,000 had a prevalence of 24.24% (95% CI: 15.8-32.7%), and among overweight subjects was 25.49% (95% CI: 21.3-29.7%). This study found a relatively high prevalence of foot ulcers in Punjab, Pakistan. The results indicate that diabetic foot ulcers have become a major health problem in diabetic patients, and better strategies and preventive measures should be opted to deal with the epidemic.

Dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft versus standard of care alone in treatment of Wagner 1 diabetic foot ulcers: a trial-based health economics study

AIMS

The aim of this health economics study was to estimate the cost-utility of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) plus standard of care (SOC) (group 1) versus SOC alone (group 2) based on a published randomized controlled trial in which patients who had an eligible Wagner 1 diabetic foot ulcer wound were randomized to either of these treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Markov microsimulation was used to project trial results out to a 1-year horizon time with a third-party payer perspective. The starting health state was an unhealed non-infected ulcer with other health states of healed ulcer, infected non-healed ulcer, cellulitis, osteomyelitis, and absorbing states of dead or amputation. All patients started with unhealed non-infected ulcers at cycle 0. Costs were incurred by patients for procedures at hospital outpatient wound care provider-based departments (PBDs) and hospitals (if complications occurred) and were calculated using time-based activity costing methods. Effectiveness units were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) computed from literature utility values. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were also conducted.

RESULTS

After 1 year, the calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for group 1 versus group 2 was -$4,373 with group 1 (dHACA) being dominant over group 2 (SOC). PSA demonstrated that group 1 had 69.2% lower cost values with increased positive incremental effectiveness for 94.9% of values. A willingness to pay (WTP) curve showed that about 92% of interventions were cost effective for group 1 when $50,000 was paid.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that dHACA added to SOC compared to SOC alone was extremely cost-effective in the defined trial population.

Clinical guideline on topical growth factors for skin wounds

An increased number of patients with skin wounds have been witnessed in the past decades. Among the various kinds of treatments for skin wounds, topical exogenous growth factors are indispensable and have been used in many countries. However, whether they have reliable effects remains controversial, and their application for skin wound treatment needs to be further standardized and optimized in terms of socio-economic considerations. Thus, the Chinese Burn Association developed this guideline indicating efficacy, application details, adverse reactions and precautions of five clinically common topical growth factors using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation method to promote the rational application of topical exogenous growth factors in skin wounds and to benefit more patients.

The Role of Recombinant Proteins and Growth Factors in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Recombinant proteins and growth factors are emerging therapies for diabetic foot ulcers. Despite several clinical reports, there has been no comprehensive and systematic assessment of the totality of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of recombinant proteins and growth factors in diabetic foot ulcers. We tried to address this gap through an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched, and RCTs on the efficacy of recombinant proteins and growth factors in the treatment of cutaneous wounds in diabetic patients were selected. The literature search and assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Jadad scale.

RESULTS

We identified 26 RCTs involving diabetic patients with ulcer that evaluated the effectiveness of platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, erythropoietin, transforming growth factor, talactoferrin, and rusalatide acetate. The main primary outcome was complete healing though different indices were employed to define this such as wound closure, granulation tissue formation, or complete reepithelialization. Few studies had a follow-up period to report any recurrence and amputation rate. No adverse effect was reported due to the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there is a greater agreement on the effectiveness of EGF to enhance the healing of diabetic ulcers. Nevertheless, extant evidence is lacking for other agents since few trials have been conducted for most of the growth factors and available studies are heterogeneous in their methodologies.

Intralesional epidermal growth factor application is a potential therapeutic strategy to improve diabetic foot ulcer healing and prevent amputation

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intralesional epidermal growth factor (EGF) in preventing the extremity from a major amputation and its effects on wound healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

Material and Methods

Thirty-three patients with DFUs were treated with intralesional EGF application between January 2013 and January 2017. The first endpoint was to determine the prevention rate of major amputation within 12 months following treatment. The second endpoints were the recovery of ulcer surface area with ≥ 50% granulation following two months and the healing of ulcer surface area with ≥ 75% granulation following six months after the first application of EGF.

Results

After three patients were excluded because of major side effects in the remaining 30 patients (48 DFUs), granulation rate of ≥ 50% was achieved in 24 (37 DFUs) patients, and not achieved in 6 (11 DFUs) patients eight weeks following the EGF application. A granulation rate of ≥ 75% was achieved in 21 (31 DFUs) patients after six months. At 12 months following the treatment, one major and seven minor amputations were performed, a total of 10 DFUs in five patients were not healed, and the DFUs in 17 patients completely recovered.

Conclusion

Intralesional EGF application has positive results in addition to good foot care in DFUs, and promising results can be obtained by protecting the extremity from amputation by using it in patients whose vascular intervention methods are not appropriate and have DFUs that do not heal with conventional wound care treatments.

Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review

Background

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes and particularly susceptible to infection. DFU infection intervention efficacy is declining due to antimicrobial resistance and a systematic review of economic evaluations considering their economic feasibility is timely and required.

Aim

To obtain and critically appraise all available full economic evaluations jointly considering costs and outcomes of infected DFUs.

Methods

A literature search was conducted across MedLine, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane Database seeking evaluations published from inception to 2019 using specific key concepts. Eligibility criteria were defined to guide study selection. Articles were identified by screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review before inclusion. We identified 352 papers that report economic analysis of the costs and outcomes of interventions aimed at diabetic foot ulcer infections. Key characteristics of eligible economic evaluations were extracted, and their quality assessed against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.

Results

542 records were screened and 39 full-texts assessed for eligibility. A total of 19 papers were included in the final analysis. All studies except one identified cost-saving or cost-effective interventions. The evaluations included in the final analysis were so heterogeneous that comparison of them was not possible. All studies were of “excellent”, “very good” or “good” quality when assessed against the CHEERS checklist.

Conclusions

Consistent identification of cost-effective and cost-saving interventions may help to reduce the DFU healthcare burden. Future research should involve clinical implementation of interventions with parallel economic evaluation rather than model-based evaluations.