1
|
Huang L, Zhu L, Yan J, Lin Y, Ding D, He L, Li Y, Ying Y, Shen L, Jiang Y, Cai H, Jiang T. Genomic characterization and outbreak investigations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a county-level hospital in China. Front Microbiol 2024; 15:1387855. [PMID: 38638904 PMCID: PMC11025083 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1387855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common pathogen contributing to healthcare-associated infections, which can result in multiple sites infections. The epidemiological characteristics of MRSA exhibit variability among distinct regions and healthcare facilities. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular epidemiology and nosocomial outbreak characteristics of MRSA in a county-level hospital in China. A total of 130 non-repetitive MRSA strains were collected from December 2020 to November 2021. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to identify antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted to ascertain genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships. Independent transmission scenarios were determined by the phylogeny derived from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the core genome. All the MRSA isolates were collected from the intensive care unit (30.00%, 39/130), the department of otorhinolaryngology (10.00%, 13/130) and the department of burn unit (9.23%, 12/130). The clinical samples mainly included phlegm (53.85%, 70/130), purulent fluid (24.62%, 32/130), and secretions (8.46%, 11/130). The resistance rates to erythromycin, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin were 75.38, 40.00, and 39.23%, respectively. All the isolates belonged to 11 clonal complexes (CCs), with the major prevalent types were CC5, CC59, and CC398, accounting for 30.00% (39/130), 29.23% (38/130), and 16.92% (22/130), respectively. Twenty sequence types (STs) were identified, and ST59 (25.38%, 33/130) was the dominant lineage, followed by ST5 (23.84%, 31/130) and ST398 (16.92%, 22/130). Three different SCCmec types were investigated, most of isolates were type IV (33.85%, 44/130), followed by type II (27.69%, 36/130) and type III (0.77%, 1/130). The common clonal structures included CC5-ST5-t2460-SCCmec IIa, CC59-ST59-t437-SCCmec IV and CC398-ST398-t034-SCCmec (-), with rates of 16.92% (22/130), 14.62% (19/130), and 13.84% (18/130), respectively. Only 12 panton-valentine leucocidin (PVL) positive strains were identified. Two independent clonal outbreaks were detected, one consisting of 22 PVL-negative strains belongs to CC5-ST5-t2460-SCCmec IIa and the other consisting of 8 PVL-negative strains belongs to CC5-ST5-t311-SCCmec IIa. Overall, our study indicated that the CC5 lineage emerged as the predominant epidemic clone of MRSA, responsible for nosocomial outbreaks and transmission within a county-level hospital in China, highlighting the necessity to strengthen infection control measures for MRSA in such healthcare facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linyao Huang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Liangrong Zhu
- Department of Pharmacy, Wenling Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Wenling Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Jianxin Yan
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Yajing Lin
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Ding Ding
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Long He
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Yexuzi Li
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Yi Ying
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Xianju’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, China
| | - Lijiong Shen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Yuhan Jiang
- School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haijun Cai
- Burn Unit, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| | - Tian Jiang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenling, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li X, Li G, Huang H, Wan P, Lu Y, Li Z, Xie L, Xiong W, Zeng Z. The occurrence and contamination of optrA-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from duck farms in Guangdong, China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2023; 35:86-92. [PMID: 37689309 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Staphylococcus aureus, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is an important zoonotic microorganism that increasingly causes public health concern worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and transmission of S. aureus in duck farms and evaluate its antimicrobial resistance and genetic characteristics. METHODS The samples associated with ducks, feeders, and the environment were collected on 14 duck farms from four areas in Guangdong, China, from 2020 to 2021. All isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. A comprehensive epidemiological survey of S. aureus was conducted by S. aureus protein A typing and whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS A total of 560 samples were collected. The prevalence rate of MRSA among ducks (8.1%, 11 of 135) was higher compared with that in environmental samples. OptrA-positive ST398-t034 MRSA were first detected from duck farms in China. A total of 79.3% (34 of 46) S. aureus isolates showed multidrug-resistant phenotypes. Notably, some isolates carried multidrug-resistant genes encoding macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B, pleuromutilin-pleuromutilin-streptogramin A, and oxazolidinone. Analysis of the virulence genes revealed that the MRSA isolates carried genes encoding gamma-hemolysin, enterotoxin, and leukocidin. ST9-t899 is a primary clonal lineage among duck- and environment-associated MRSA. Single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis showed the potential contamination relationship of optrA-positive ST2308 MRSA isolates carrying the gamma-hemolysin genes and the leukocidin virulence genes between airborne dust and sick ducks. CONCLUSION The contamination of MRSA, especially optrA-positive MRSA, between food animals and the environment is a growing public health concern worldwide. Based on One Health principles, continuous surveillance of MRSA is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoshen Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guihua Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Honghao Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Wan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixing Lu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longfei Xie
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenguang Xiong
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenling Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China; National Laboratory of Safety Evaluation (Environmental Assessment) of Veterinary Drugs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdullahi IN, Juárez-Fernández G, Höfle U, Latorre-Fernández J, Cardona-Cabrera T, Mínguez-Romero D, Zarazaga M, Lozano C, Torres C. Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in the Nasotracheal Cavities of White Stork Nestlings (Ciconia ciconia) in Spain: Genetic Diversity, Resistomes and Virulence Factors. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY 2023; 86:1993-2002. [PMID: 36964230 PMCID: PMC10497646 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-023-02208-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The molecular ecology of Staphylococcus aureus in migratory birds (such as white storks) is necessary to understand their relevance in the "One Health" ecosystems. This study determined the nasotracheal carriage rates of S. aureus from white storks in Southern Spain and genetically characterized the within-host diversity. A collection of 67 S. aureus strains, previously obtained from 87 white stork nestlings (52 nasal and 85 tracheal samples) fed by their parents with food foraged in natural and landfill habitats, were tested for their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes. Moreover, the AMR genotypes, immune evasion cluster (IEC), virulence genes and the detection of CC398 lineage were studied by PCR. The spa types and multilocus-sequencing-typing (MLST) were also determined by PCR and sequencing. Staphylococcus aureus carriage was found in 31% of storks (36.5%/11.9% in nasal/tracheal samples). All isolates were methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and 8.8% of them were also susceptible to all tested antibiotics. The AMR phenotype/percentage/genes detected were as follows: penicillin/79.1%/blaZ; erythromycin-clindamycin-inducible/19.1%/ermA, ermT; tetracycline/11.9%/tetK; clindamycin/4.5%/lnuA and ciprofloxacin/4.5%. Twenty-one different spa types, including 2 new ones (t7778-ST15-CC15 and t18009-ST26-CC25), were detected and ascribed to 11 clonal complexes (CCs). MSSA-CC398 (8.2%), MSSA-CC15 (7.1%) and MSSA-ST291 (5.9%) were the most prevalent lineages in storks. Moreover, tst-positive (MSSA-CC22-t223 and MSSA-CC30-t1654), eta-positive (MSSA-CC9-t209) and etb-positive strains (MSSA-CC45-t015) were detected in four storks. The 18.5% of storks harboured distinct MSSA strains (with different lineages and/or AMR genes). Nestlings of storks foraging in landfills (10 CCs) had more diverse S. aureus strains than those of parents foraging in natural habitats (3 CCs). Low level of AMR was demonstrated among S. aureus strains. The predominance of MSSA-CC398 (an emergent clade) and toxigenic MSSA strains in stork nestlings highlight the need for continuous surveillance of S. aureus in wild birds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idris Nasir Abdullahi
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain
| | - Guillermo Juárez-Fernández
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain
| | - Ursula Höfle
- SaBio (Health and Biotechnology) Research Group, Spanish Wildlife Research Institute IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Javier Latorre-Fernández
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain
| | - Teresa Cardona-Cabrera
- SaBio (Health and Biotechnology) Research Group, Spanish Wildlife Research Institute IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - David Mínguez-Romero
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain
| | - Myriam Zarazaga
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain
| | - Carmen Lozano
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain
| | - Carmen Torres
- Area Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, OneHealth-UR Research Group, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Going Back in Time: Increasing Penicillin Susceptibility among Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Osteoarticular Infections in Children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023; 67:e0119622. [PMID: 36598265 PMCID: PMC9872685 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01196-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In the late 1940s to 1950s, Staphylococcus aureus isolates first-gained resistance to penicillin. Recently, some centers have described an increase in the proportion of methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) which are also susceptible to penicillin (PSSA). There are little data on the frequency of PSSA infections in children. We investigated the prevalence of penicillin susceptibility among pediatric MSSA acute hematogenous osteoarticular infection (OAI) isolates. MSSA OAI isolates were obtained through surveillance studies at Texas Children's and St. Louis Children's Hospitals from January 2011 to December 2019. All isolates underwent PCR for blaZ β-lactamase, PVL genes and agr group. All blaZ negative isolates then underwent penicillin MIC determination. blaZ negative isolates with penicillin MIC ≤ 0.125 μg/mL were considered PSSA. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted on a subset of isolates. A total of 329 unique isolates were included in the study. The median patient age was 9.2 years (IQR:5.1 to 12.2). Overall, 6.7% of isolates were penicillin susceptible. No PSSA were detected prior to 2015 but increased yearly thereafter. By the final study year, 20.4% of isolates were PSSA (P = 0.001). PSSA were similar to penicillin-resistant MSSA (PR-MSSA) isolates in terms agr group and PVL carriage as well as clinical presentation and outcomes. PSSA were of distinct sequence types compared to PR-MSSA. PSSA appears to be increasing among OAI in U.S. children. Overall, PSSA isolates are associated with a similar clinical presentation as penicillin-resistant isolates. The potential for use of penicillin treatment in PSSA OAI warrants further study.
Collapse
|
5
|
Current molecular approach for diagnosis of MRSA: a meta-narrative review. Drug Target Insights 2022; 16:88-96. [PMID: 36761068 PMCID: PMC9906022 DOI: 10.33393/dti.2022.2522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Detection and diagnosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are important in ensuring a correct and effective treatment, further reducing its spread. A wide range of molecular approaches has been used for the diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in MRSA. This review aims to study and appraise widely used molecular diagnostic methods for detecting MRSA. Methods: This meta-narrative review was performed by searching PubMed using the following search terms: (molecular diagnosis) AND (antimicrobial resistance) AND (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Studies using molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of MRSA were included, while non-English language, duplicates and non-article studies were excluded. After reviewing the libraries and a further manual search, 20 studies were included in this article. RAMESES publication standard for narrative reviews was used for this synthesis. Results: A total of 20 full papers were reviewed and appraised in this synthesis, consisting of PCR technique (n = 7), deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Microarray (n = 1), DNA sequencing (n = 2), Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay (n = 2), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) (n = 2), MLST (n = 4), SCCmec typing (n = 1) and GENECUBE (n = 1). Discussion: Different diagnostic methods used to diagnose MRSA have been studied in this review. This study concludes that PCR has been extensively used due to its higher sensitivity and cost-effectiveness in the past five years
Collapse
|
6
|
Distribution and Current State of Molecular Genetic Characterization in Pathogenic Free-Living Amoebae. Pathogens 2022; 11:pathogens11101199. [PMID: 36297255 PMCID: PMC9612019 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11101199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Free-living amoebae (FLA) are protozoa widely distributed in the environment, found in a great diversity of terrestrial biomes. Some genera of FLA are linked to human infections. The genus Acanthamoeba is currently classified into 23 genotypes (T1-T23), and of these some (T1, T2, T4, T5, T10, T12, and T18) are known to be capable of causing granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE) mainly in immunocompromised patients while other genotypes (T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T10, T11, T12, and T15) cause Acanthamoeba keratitis mainly in otherwise healthy patients. Meanwhile, Naegleria fowleri is the causative agent of an acute infection called primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), while Balamuthia mandrillaris, like some Acanthamoeba genotypes, causes GAE, differing from the latter in the description of numerous cases in patients immunocompetent. Finally, other FLA related to the pathologies mentioned above have been reported; Sappinia sp. is responsible for one case of amoebic encephalitis; Vermamoeba vermiformis has been found in cases of ocular damage, and its extraordinary capacity as endocytobiont for microorganisms of public health importance such as Legionella pneumophila, Bacillus anthracis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, among others. This review addressed issues related to epidemiology, updating their geographic distribution and cases reported in recent years for pathogenic FLA.
Collapse
|
7
|
Coombs GW, Yee NWT, Daley D, Bennett CM, Robinson JO, Stegger M, Shoby P, Mowlaboccus S. Molecular Epidemiology of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Australia and Reliability of Diagnostic Phenotypic Susceptibility Methods to Detect Penicillin Susceptibility. Microorganisms 2022; 10:microorganisms10081650. [PMID: 36014068 PMCID: PMC9413241 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10081650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Defined by the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains, Staphylococcus aureus is a priority bacterial species with high antibiotic resistance. However, a rise in the prevalence of penicillin-susceptible S. aureus (PSSA) bloodstream infections has recently been observed worldwide, including in Australia, where the proportion of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus causing bacteremia identified phenotypically as penicillin-susceptible has increased by over 35%, from 17.5% in 2013 to 23.7% in 2020. Objectives: To determine the population structure of PSSA causing community- and hospital-onset bacteremia in Australia and to evaluate routine phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility methods to reliably confirm penicillin resistance on blaZ-positive S. aureus initially classified as penicillin-susceptible by the Vitek® 2 automated microbiology system. Results: Whole genome sequencing on 470 PSSA collected in the 2020 Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance Australian Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis Outcome Programme identified 84 multilocus sequence types (STs), of which 79 (463 isolates) were grouped into 22 clonal complexes (CCs). The dominant CCs included CC5 (31.9%), CC97 (10.2%), CC45 (10.0%), CC15 (8.7%), and CC188 (4.9%). Many of the CCs had multiple STs and spa types and, based on the immune evasion cluster type, isolates within a CC could be classified into different strains harboring a range of virulence and resistance genes. Phylogenetic analyses of the isolates showed most CCs were represented by one clade. The blaZ gene was identified in 45 (9.6%) PSSA. Although multiclonal, approximately 50% of blaZ-positive PSSA were from CC15 and were found to be genetically distant from the blaZ-negative CC15 PSSA. The broth microdilution, Etest® and cefinase, performed poorly; however, when the appearance of the zone edge was considered; as per the EUCAST and CLSI criteria, disc diffusion detected 100% of blaZ-positive PSSA. Conclusions: In Australia, PSSA bacteremia is not caused by the expansion of a single clone. Approximately 10% of S. aureus classified as penicillin-susceptible by the Vitek® 2 harbored blaZ. Consequently, we recommend that confirmation of Vitek® 2 PSSA be performed using an alternative method, such as disc diffusion with careful interpretation of the zone edge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey W. Coombs
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Nicholas W. T. Yee
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Denise Daley
- Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Catherine M. Bennett
- Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - James O. Robinson
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA 6003, Australia
| | - Marc Stegger
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institute, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Princy Shoby
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Shakeel Mowlaboccus
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effectiveness and Safety of Ceftriaxone Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11030375. [PMID: 35326838 PMCID: PMC8944781 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11030375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Ceftriaxone is a potential alternative for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in acute care and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) settings. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ceftriaxone for the treatment of MSSA BSIs. (2) Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from their inception to October 30th 2021. Our outcomes included clinical cure, microbiological cure, 30- and 90-day mortality, 90-day hospital readmission, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We compared ceftriaxone against standard of care (SOC) therapy. We used the random-effects model for the meta-analysis, and our estimated effects were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). (3) Results: Twelve retrospective cohort studies were included, comprising 1037 patients in the ceftriaxone arms and 2088 patients in the SOC arms. The clinical cure rate of the ceftriaxone regimen was not statistically different from SOC: OR 0.65 (95% CI: 0.29–1.45). Ceftriaxone was also not statistically different from SOC in microbiological cure: OR 1.48 (95% CI: 0.29–7.51); 30-day mortality: OR 0.79 (95% CI: 0.14–4.65); 90-day mortality: OR 0.82 (95% CI: 0.38–1.80); 90-day hospital readmission: OR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.92–1.56); and ADRs: OR 0.92 (95% CI: 0.39–2.18). (4) Conclusion: Ceftriaxone could provide an alternative for the treatment of MSSA BSIs in acute care and OPAT settings (except in patients whose BSIs were due to infective endocarditis).
Collapse
|