Ephedrine‐Induced Cardiac Ischemia: Exposure Confirmed with a Serum Level

Natural Sympathomimetic Drugs: From Pharmacology to Toxicology

Sympathomimetic agents are a group of chemical compounds that are able to activate the sympathetic nervous system either directly via adrenergic receptors or indirectly by increasing endogenous catecholamine levels or mimicking their intracellular signaling pathways. Compounds from this group, both used therapeutically or abused, comprise endogenous catecholamines (such as adrenaline and noradrenaline), synthetic amines (e.g., isoproterenol and dobutamine), trace amines (e.g., tyramine, tryptamine, histamine and octopamine), illicit drugs (e.g., ephedrine, cathinone, and cocaine), or even caffeine and synephrine. In addition to the effects triggered by stimulation of the sympathetic system, the discovery of trace amine associated receptors (TAARs) in humans brought new insights about their sympathomimetic pharmacology and toxicology. Although synthetic sympathomimetic agents are mostly seen as toxic, natural sympathomimetic agents are considered more complacently in the terms of safety in the vision of the lay public. Here, we aim to discuss the pharmacological and mainly toxicological aspects related to sympathomimetic natural agents, in particular of trace amines, compounds derived from plants like ephedra and khat, and finally cocaine. The main purpose of this review is to give a scientific and updated view of those agents and serve as a reminder on the safety issues of natural sympathomimetic agents most used in the community.

A beating heart cell model to predict cardiotoxicity: effects of the dietary supplement ingredients higenamine, phenylethylamine, ephedrine and caffeine

Some dietary supplements may contain cardiac stimulants and potential cardiotoxins. In vitro studies may identify ingredients of concern. A beating human cardiomyocyte cell line was used to evaluate cellular effects following phenylethylamine (PEA), higenamine, ephedrine or caffeine treatment. PEA and higenamine exposure levels simulated published blood levels in humans or animals after intravenous administration. Ephedrine and caffeine levels approximated published blood levels following human oral intake. At low or midrange levels, each chemical was examined plus or minus 50 µM caffeine, simulating human blood levels reported after consumption of caffeine-enriched dietary supplements. To measure beats per minute (BPM), peak width, etc., rhythmic rise and fall in intracellular calcium levels following 30 min of treatment was examined. Higenamine 31.3 ng/ml or 313 ng/ml significantly increased BPM in an escalating manner. PEA increased BPM at 0.8 and 8 µg/ml, while 80 µg/ml PEA reduced BPM and widened peaks. Ephedrine produced a significant BPM dose response from 0.5 to 5.0 µM. Caffeine increased BPM only at a toxic level of 250 µM. Adding caffeine to PEA or higenamine but not ephedrine further increased BPM. These in vitro results suggest that additional testing may be warranted in vivo to further evaluate these effects.

Pathology of emesis: its autonomic basis

Vagal and non-vagal pathways as well as several brainstem nuclei participate in vomiting in response to different emetic stimuli. Autonomic pathways involved in nausea are less well understood. Numerous gastrointestinal disorders with prominent nausea and vomiting including gastroparesis, cyclic vomiting syndrome, and motion sickness have associated autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Autonomic disturbances are also seen with non-gastrointestinal diseases with gut manifestations such as migraine headaches, orthostatic intolerance, and familial dysautonomia. Stimulation of emetic pathways involves activation of a range of receptor subtypes. Agents acting on these receptors form the basis for antiemetic therapies. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, a prevalent and severe consequence of anticancer treatment, is preventable in many instances by agents acting on the autonomic nervous system. Likewise, non-medication therapies may act in part via modulation of some of these same autonomic pathways.

28 Days repeated oral dose toxicity test of aqueous extracts of mahwangyounpae-tang, a polyherbal formula

Mahwangyounpae-tang (MT), consisting of 22 types of herbal extracts has been used for thousands of years in Korean traditional medicine for the oral treatment of respiratory diseases including asthma. As part of a safety evaluation of MT extract for use in asthma, the 28 day repeat oral dose toxicity of an aqueous MT extract was evaluated at 800, 400 and 200mg/kg per day dose levels. The results showed that no significant toxicological changes were observed when 200 and 400mg/kg per day of MT extract was administered to rats. But when the dose was increased to 800 mg/kg per day, increases of body weights, food consumptions, and heart and kidney weights were observed with hypertrophy of heart and tubular necrosis of kidney. Besides this, no other signs of toxicity were observed. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the no observed adverse effect level of MT extract is 400mg/kg per day. Therefore, the use of MT is expected to be safe because 30 mg/kg was shown to be pharmacologically effective in mice and the high dose heart and kidney findings are not considered to represent any safety concern for humans.

Cardiac troponin T and cardiac dysfunction in extremely low-birth-weight infants

Extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants frequently manifest signs of cardiac dysfunction requiring inotropic support. It is not clear if this is due to cardiac injury, which can be monitored by measuring cardiac troponin T (cTnT). We performed a nested prospective cohort study at a university level III neonatal intensive care unit. The study included 27 infants weighing between 500 and 999 g. Exclusion criteria included evidence of sepsis, use of postnatal steroids, and cardiac anomalies. Measurements included serum cTnT and echocardiogram in the first 48 hours of life. The mean serum cTnT level of the study population was 0.52 +/- 0.38 ng/ml. It was higher in those with lower Apgar scores (0.89 +/- 0.37 if 5-minute Apgar < 4 vs 0.36 +/- 0.26 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and correlated to initial base deficit (r = -0.37, p < 0.05). Infants who required inotropic support had higher cTnT levels than those who did not (0.73 +/- 0.43 vs 0.39 +/- 0.29 ng/ml, p < 0.03). cTnT concentrations did not relate to simultaneous echocardiographic measures of cardiac function. In ELBW infants, serum cTnT levels are higher than normally seen in term infants and adults, and they are higher in infants with greater perinatal stress as well as those who show evidence of cardiac dysfunction requiring pressor support.

Mechanistic pharmacokinetic modelling of ephedrine, norephedrine and caffeine in healthy subjects

AIM

The combination of ephedrine and caffeine has been used in herbal products for weight loss and athletic performance-enhancement, but the pharmacokinetic profiles of these compounds have not been well characterized. This study aimed to develop a mechanistic model describing ephedrine, norephedrine, and caffeine pharmacokinetics and their interactions in healthy subjects.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic model was developed based on the simultaneous modelling using plasma samples gathered from two clinical trials. The treatments consisted of single-doses of pharmaceutical caffeine and ephedrine, given alone or together, and an herbal formulation containing both caffeine and ephedrine. We used a mixed-effect statistical model and the program NONMEM to take account of intersubject variability.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy-nine ephedrine, 352 norephedrine, 417 caffeine plasma concentrations and 40 ephedrine urine concentrations were obtained from 24 subjects. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption described the caffeine data. Caffeine clearance was 0.083 l min(-1) (CV 38%) and decreased to 0.038 l min(-1) in presence of oral contraceptive therapy, its volume of distribution was 38.6 l (CV 20%) and its absorption rate constant was 0.064 l min(-1) (CV 50%). A four-compartment model described the pharmocokinetics of ephedrine and norephedrine. Ephedrine was eliminated mostly renally, with a clearance of 0.34 l min(-1) (CV 11%), and a volume of distribution of 181 l (CV 19%). Nonlinearity in the conversion of ephedrine to norephedrine was observed. Different models showed that the simultaneous administration of caffeine, or the amount of caffeine in the absorption compartment, was associated with a slower rate of absorption of ephedrine. A 32% greater relative bioavailability of herbal compared with pharmaceutical ephedrine administration was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a mechanistic model for ephedrine, norephedrine and caffeine pharmacokinetics and their interactions. The relative bioavailability of ephedrine differed between the herbal supplement compared with the pharmaceutical formulation. Concomitant ingestion of caffeine slowed the absorption rate of ephedrine, which is mainly related to the amount of the former in the absorption compartment. A saturable process appears to be involved in the metabolism of ephedrine to norephedrine.