Incidence and severity of hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine: a single-institution experience

Incidence and severity of hand-foot syndrome in cancer patients receiving infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine-containing chemotherapy regimens

BackgroundHand-foot syndrome is a common adverse effect of 5-fluorouracil infusion or oral capecitabine. Several types of research have shown that clinical presentations of hand-foot syndrome vary by ethnicity, so we tried to look at the incidence and severity of hand-foot syndrome in individuals receiving infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine at a tertiary care hospital in central Kerala, India.AimTo determine the incidence and severity of hand-foot syndrome in cancer patients receiving infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine chemotherapy regimen.MethodologyA prospective cohort study was conducted at the oncology department of a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, India. Our study subjects were those who underwent chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine and later developed hand-foot syndrome. The patients who developed hand-foot syndrome after chemotherapy were assessed to determine the incidence of hand-foot syndrome. Also, the severity of hand-foot syndrome among cancer patients was estimated using CTCAE version 5.0.ResultsOut of 104 study participants, 76.90% (N = 80) of the patients had hand-foot syndrome, whereas 23.07% (N = 24) did not. The onset of hand-foot syndrome symptoms varied depending on the patient. Most patients (60%) displayed grade-one symptoms in their third cycle. The remaining patients showed grade-one symptoms in cycle one (3.75%), cycle two (17.5%), and cycle four (18.75%). The study also showed t no association between the incidence of hand-foot syndrome and the type of regimen.ConclusionThe majority of the patients suffered from hand-foot syndrome. As well, most of the patients were afflicted by grade one hand-foot syndrome.

Network pharmacology and molecular docking approach to elucidate the mechanisms of safflower, phellodendron, scutellaria baicalensis, coptis, and gardenia in hand-foot syndrome

Background

Safflower, phellodendron, scutellaria baicalensis, coptis, and gardenia (SPSCG) are medicinal plants with a wide range of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. However, the related mechanism of SPSCG against hand-foot syndrome (HFS) has yet to be revealed.

Objective

To investigate the mechanisms of SPSCG in the treatment of HFS using the Network Pharmacology.

Methods

Active ingredients and targets of SPSCG for HFS were screened by the Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP) and Swiss Target Prediction databases. Potential therapeutic targets were collected from the GeneCards and OMIM databases. Subsequently, protein-protein interactions (PPI), Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, and pathways from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were performed to investigate the potential mechanism of the SPSCG in HFS. Then, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to predict the binding interactions between the active compound and the core target. Finally, vitro experiments were used to verify the repair effect of key ingredients of SPSCG on cell damage caused by 5-Fluorouracil.

Results

Quercetin, kaempferol, β-sitosterol, and stigmasterol were identified as the major active components of SPSCG. GO analysis showed a total of 1,127 biological processes, 42 terms cellular components, and 57 molecular functions. KEGG analysis showed that the MAPK, TNF, and IL-17 signaling pathways were significantly enriched. The PPI analysis discovered that EGFR, CASP3, AKT1, CCND1, and CTNNB1 shared the highest centrality among all target genes. The experimental results confirmed that these SPSCG active ingredients could treat HFS by reducing inflammation reaction and promoting cell damage repair.

Conclusion

SPSCG may alleviate HFS by exerting antioxidative effects and suppressing inflammatory responses.

A novel animal model of tegafur-induced hand-foot syndrome

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common side effect of fluoropyrimidine anticancer drugs and often becomes a dose-limiting manifestation of toxicity once it occurs. The precise mechanism of HFS remains unclear, and effective measures to prevent or relieve it are currently limited. To investigate the pathogenesis of HFS and effective measures for treating or preventing it, establishment of animal models is crucial. Here, we gave male SD rats 170 mg/kg of tegafur (prodrug of 5-FU) daily for 35 days and evaluated their clinical and histopathological characteristics and pain-related behavioral tests. TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells and 5-FU concentrations in the plantar skin were also evaluated to investigate the mode of toxicity. Tegafur treatment induced hypersensitivity to mechanical pressure on the plantar surface beginning in Week 3, with decreased locomotor activity. Focal desquamation of the plantar skin was observed almost concomitantly and gradually worsened to palmar and plantar skin thickening with severe desquamation, cracks, or both. Histopathological lesions in the plantar skin at treatment end included desquamation and thickening, with epidermal cell swelling and spongiosis and focal inflammation in the dermis. The time-course of development and the characteristics of the tegafur-induced skin lesions were highly similar to those in human fluoropyrimidine-induced HFS, indicating that a HFS rat model was successfully established. Localized high concentrations of 5-FU in the palmar and plantar skin, with increased apoptosis, are likely involved in the mode of toxicity. Our model should clarify the pathogenesis of HFS, providing new insights into the best supportive care and prevention.

Topical Diclofenac for Prevention of Capecitabine-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting side effect of capecitabine. Celecoxib prevents HFS by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) that is upregulated because of the underlying associated inflammation. However, systemic side effects of celecoxib have limited routine prescription. Topical diclofenac inhibits COX-2 locally with minimal risk of systemic adverse events. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the efficacy of topical diclofenac in the prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS.

METHODS

In this single-site phase III randomized double-blind trial, we enrolled patients with breast or GI cancer who were planned to receive capecitabine-based treatment. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive topical diclofenac or placebo gel for 12 weeks or until the development of HFS, whichever occurred earlier. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 HFS (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5), which was compared between the two groups using simple logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 264 patients were randomly assigned to receive topical diclofenac gel (n = 131) or placebo (n = 133). Grade 2 or 3 HFS was observed in 3.8% of participants in the diclofenac group compared with 15.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.3 to 18.1; P = .003). Grade 1-3 HFS was lower in the diclofenac group than in the placebo group (6.1% v 18.1%; absolute risk difference, 11.9%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 19.6). Capecitabine dose reductions because of HFS were less frequent in the diclofenac group (3.8%) than in the placebo group (13.5%; absolute risk difference, 9.7%; 95% CI, 3.0 to 16.4).

CONCLUSION

Topical diclofenac prevented HFS in patients receiving capecitabine. This trial supports the use of topical diclofenac to prevent capecitabine-associated HFS.

Prevalence of hand-foot syndrome following chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the prevalence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, from their inception to September 20, 2022, to identify studies on the prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. Comprehensive retrieval of literature was performed using the literature tracing method. We calculated the prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy based on meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included, involving 4773 cases. Meta-analysis of the random effects model showed that the total prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.332, 0.651). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the most frequent grades of HFS were grades 1 and 2, accounting for 40.1% (95% CI: 0.285, 0.523) of cases; this rate was markedly higher than that of grades 3 and 4 (5.8%; 95% CI: 0.020, 0.112). The meta-regression results illustrated that the type of research, country of the study population, type of drug, and year of publication were not sources of heterogeneity in this setting (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present findings showed that the prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy was high. Healthcare professionals should provide knowledge to such patients regarding the prevention and management of HFS.

Oral hyperpigmentation as an initial clinical aspect of hand foot syndrome

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common adverse effect of anticancer therapy. It is known to cause dermatological symptoms including acral erythema and dysesthesia of the palms and soles of the feet, swelling, pain, itching, and scaling. Some drugs, like capecitabine, are known to trigger this condition. However, pigmentation of the oral mucosa is a rare adverse effect. This study aims to report a case of oral mucosa hyperpigmentation caused by capecitabine therapy before the clinical diagnosis of HFS. A 58-year-old female, diagnosed with invasive breast duct carcinoma, had the central nervous system, liver, skin, and lung metastasis, using capecitabine every day for 14 cycles. Oral examination revealed multifocal black macules on the hard palate, bilateral buccal mucosa, gingival mucosa, and dorsum of the tongue. The clinical hypothesis was oral mucosa hyperpigmentation by capecitabine use and only periodic follow-up was necessary. Hyperpigmentation of oral mucosa by capecitabine is a rare consequence of neoplastic therapy and your association with HFS is unclear, and poorly reported. The report of these events is important to alert oncology health teams about the individual tolerance to capecitabine therapy.

Performance of capecitabine in novel combination therapies in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers throughout the world, and no definitive cure has ever been found. Perhaps a new insight into the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs could help better treat patients. Targeted therapies have significantly improved the median overall survival of colorectal cancer patients. One of the standard chemotherapy regimens used for colorectal cancer is capecitabine, which is important in monotherapy and combination therapies. Capecitabine, with other chemotherapeutic agents (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, perifosine, 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, aspirin, celecoxib, statins, quinacrine, inositol hexaphosphate and inositol, cystine/theanine, curcumin, and isorhamnetin), and biological ones (antibodies) plays an important role in the inhibition of some signaling pathways, increasing survival, reducing tumor growth and side effects of capecitabine. However, some drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors, are negatively related to capecitabine; therefore, the purpose of this work is to review and discuss the performance of capecitabine combination therapies in colorectal cancer.

Use of omeprazole, the proton pump inhibitor, as a potential therapy for the capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), also known as palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), is a major side effect of capecitabine. Although the pathogenesis of HFS remains unknown, some studies suggested a potential involvement of inflammation in its pathogenesis. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects. In this study, we investigated the ameliorative effects of omeprazole, a PPI on capecitabine-related HFS in mice model, and a real-world database. Repeated administration of capecitabine (200 mg/kg, p.o., five times a week for 3 weeks) increased fluid content, redness, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α substance of the mice hind paw. Co-administration of omeprazole (20 mg/kg, p.o., at the same schedule) significantly inhibited these changes induced by capecitabine. Moreover, based on the clinical database analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, the group that has used any PPIs had a lower reporting rate of capecitabine-related PPE than the group that has not used any PPIs. (6.25% vs. 8.31%, p < 0.0001, reporting odds ratio (ROR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.83). Our results suggest that omeprazole may be a potential prophylactic agent for capecitabine-induced HFS.

A randomised controlled feasibility trial to evaluate Lawsonia inermis (henna)'s effect on palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia induced by capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

PURPOSE

To test the effectiveness of henna in the management of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) in patients receiving treatment with capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD).

METHOD

This was a randomized controlled feasibility study in three specialized tertiary cancer centers with 56 patients with a PPE grade 1 or above and various cancer diagnoses. The intervention included the local application of henna to the affected areas. The control group followed the same process with a henna inert. Primary outcome was PPE grade and secondary outcomes were the EORTC QLQ-C30, PPE-related QoL (HFS-14), activities of daily living (ECOG) and pain. Patients in both groups were assessed at baseline and then weekly at four follow-ups.

RESULTS

PPE grade in the intervention group (1-3.8%) was lower compared to the control group (4-13.38%) and also lower levels of pain were reported by the patients in the intervention group (2.46 ± 1.17) compared to the control (5.57 ± 2.01). ECOG status in the intervention group was improved compared to the control (p = 0.039). The intervention group, experienced higher Global Health Status (p ≤ 0.008), Physical function (p ≤ 0.001), Emotional Function (p = 0.029), Social function (p ≤ 0.001) and lower Fatigue (p ≤ 0.001) and Pain (p ≤ 0.001) compared to the Control group. A statistically significant interaction was found between Group and Time over the weekly measurements of HFS-14 scores (F = 5,009, p ≤ 0.002) indicating the significant effect of the intervention throughout the weekly assessments.

CONCLUSION

The trial provided preliminary evidence on henna's effectiveness for treating PPE during treatment with capecitabine or PLD, with lower PPE grades, better performance status and better HRQoL observed in the henna group. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01751893.

Adverse reactions and adherence to capecitabine: A prospective study in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine is an oral anticancer drug which can cause some adverse reactions and the great challenge for its use is to ensure the medication adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze adverse reactions and adherence to capecitabine in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital in Brazil. Outpatients undergoing capecitabine treatment for colorectal or gastric cancer were followed for three cycles of treatment. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics data were collected. Adverse reactions were analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4. Adherence to capecitabine were evaluated using Morisky-Green and MedTake tests. Statistical analysis was conducted using Chi-square, Fisher's exact and McNemer tests.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients were enrolled in this study, with a mean age was 58.5 ± 10.9 years; 51.0% were men and 51.0% Caucasian. Nausea and diarrhea were the most frequently reported adverse reactions (82.7% and 62.5%, respectively), followed by vomiting (54.8%), fatigue (54.8%), and hand-foot syndrome (53.9%). Nausea and diarrhea were also the most severe adverse reactions. Most patients were adherent to capecitabine in all cycles of treatment using the Morisky-Green test. Adherence increased significantly between cycle 1 and cycle 2 by MedTake test (p < 0.001). Some demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with adverse reactions (e.g., age and nausea, gender and nausea and vomiting) and capecitabine adherence (e.g., marital status and educational level) as well as some adverse reactions were associated with capecitabine adherence (hand-foot syndrome and nausea).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical oncology pharmacists must provide patient information on the correct use of capecitabine, manage adverse reactions, and monitor adherence to treatment. Strategies to prevent non-adherence to capecitabine must be adopted to ensure the success of pharmacotherapy.

Effect of a medicinal and edible decoction YH0618 on chemotherapy-induced dermatologic toxicity: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Dermatologic toxicities are the common adverse events (AE) with several chemotherapy agents, but they are usually neglected in the research literature and clinical practice, and there are no clinically safe and effective methods to solve the problem. This study was to determine whether a medicinal and edible decoction YH0618 is effective in accelerating reducing chemotherapy-induced dermatologic toxicity in cancer patients who have completed chemotherapy.

Methods

This was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted between 2015 and 2017. Cancer patients who have completed chemotherapy (received taxanes or anthracyclines or fluoropyrimidine) within two weeks were enrolled and then they were randomly divided into YH0618 decoction group (n=104) and wait-list control (n=110). The primary end points were the incidence of protocol-specified grade ≥2 dermatologic toxicities after 6-week intervention assessed using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Chinese version 4.0, and changes of fingernails color and skin color evaluated by L*a*b after 6 weeks of intervention. Secondary end points included assessment of quality of life (QOL) and fatigue, and some clinical objective indicators associated with myelosuppression, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

Results

The study included 214 participants [mean (SD) age, 52.49 (9.08) years in YH0618 group and 50.44 (9.71) years in wait-list group]. At 6-week, YH0618 significantly reduced the incidence of grade ≥2 in nail discoloration [odds ratio (OR), 0.653; 95% CI, 0.5–0.9; P=0.005] and alopecia (OR, 0.776; 95% CI, 0.6–1.0; P=0.048) compared with control group. Besides, YH0618 increased the L* value and reduced the a* and b* values compared with control group, indicating that YH0618 increased the brightness and reduced hyperpigmentation. YH0618 also significantly reduced chemotherapy-induced fatigue (95% CI, 0.2–4.8; P=0.033).

Conclusions

YH0618 may be a safe method in ameliorating chemotherapy-induced dermatologic toxicity especially nail discoloration, alopecia and skin hyperpigmentation, and on improving fatigue.

Trial registration

The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-15006486.

Henna Application in the Prevention of Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Patients

AIM

This study investigates the prophylactic effect of henna on the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in patients receiving capecitabine for breast and colorectal cancer.

METHOD

This experimental study was carried out between May 2014 and May 2015. In this self-control experimental study, 52 patients with breast and colorectal cancer were included on the first day of capecitabine treatment and had a minimum follow-up of 3 cycles. One hand/foot of each patient constituted the study hand/foot, whereas the others constituted the control. Henna was administered to the study hand/foot on the first day of treatment and application renewed weekly. Development of grade 1-3 toxicity was set as the termination criterion for study.

RESULTS

Painful skin changes such as rawness, intumescence and bulla formation, blocking the daily activities or self-care were observed in 26.9% of the patients in the 3rd or 4th cycles of treatment. Development time and severity of skin changes over time did not differ significantly between the study and the control hand/foot.

CONCLUSION

Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to conclude on the prophylactic effect of henna in the management of the HFS.

Hand-foot syndrome induced changes of the palmar epidermal ridge configurations during and after treatment with capecitabine

Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand-foot syndrome, HFS) is a common adverse event of treatment with cytostatic chemotherapeutics such as capecitabine. Histopathological findings are nonspecific and may even include generalized epidermal necrolysis. A total of 50 patients were examined before and after the intake of capecitabine to assess if HFS may result in relevant changes of the palmar epidermal ridge configurations with possible consequences for the patients who want to travel abroad. In total, 14 of the 50 patients developed HFS (28%) with HFS grades 1-3 observed. HFS grade 4 was not observed. HFS of grade 2 and 3 was associated with a temporary macroscopic loss of the epidermal ridges. No dactyloscopic changes that might have led to a false identification were seen in those cases. Patients with a risk of HFS development who want to travel abroad should carry a medical pass of the chemotherapeutic treatment to prevent them from difficulties in identification controls.

The effect of TJ-28 (Eppikajutsuto) on the prevention of hand-foot syndrome using Capecitabine for colorectal cancer: The Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group Study (YCOG1102)

BACKGROUND

Eppikajututo (TJ-28, a Kampo medicine) is effective against rheumatoid arthritis and eczema. We conducted a randomized comparative trial to assess the efficacy of TJ-28 for preventing hand-foot syndrome (HFS) as a complication of adjuvant chemotherapy using capecitabine.

METHODS

The present study was a multi-institutional randomized-controlled trial (UMIN000005899). Colorectal cancer patients scheduled to receive capecitabine chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy were randomly assigned to receive TJ-28 (7500 mg/day) or oral pyridoxine (60 mg/day). Patients were monitored for the development of grade ≥ 2 HFS according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria until chemotherapy completion.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study. The relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 76.2% in the TJ-28 group and 68.2% in the pyridoxine group. Grade ≥ 2 HFS developed in 6 (50.0%) of 12 TJ-28 patients and in 4 (40.0%) of 10 pyridoxine patients. Chemotherapy treatment failure was observed in seven patients, mainly due to HFS, liver dysfunction, diarrhea, and neutropenia. Chemotherapy treatment failure due to HFS occurred in none of the TJ-28 group and 2 patients (20.0%) in the pyridoxine group (p = 0.114).

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine-associated HFS was not markedly prevented by TJ-28 compared with pyridoxine. However, TJ-28 might support the continuation of chemotherapy with capecitabine. Further studies are warranted to clarify the benefits of TJ-28.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody significantly increases the risk of hand-foot skin reaction to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs): A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

With the use of multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) having emerged in recent years, skin toxicities such as hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) are primary side effects, and they lack effective prediction methods. Here, we updated a previous systematic review by establishing a meta-analysis of the risk of developing HFSR among patients receiving MKIs and antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody. Publications from PubMed and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting up to February 5, 2015, were searched to identify relevant studies, and a total of 236 patients with metastatic tumours in nine trials were included for analysis. In the meta-analysis, the pooled incidence rates of all-grade and high-grade HFSR among patients who received the combination therapy were 56.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 45%-71.1%] and 14.3% (95% CI, 9%-24.2%), respectively, with significant differences observed with MKI monotherapy (P < .05). Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that increasing the dosages of bevacizumab (77.8% vs 51.1%, P = .04) and MKIs (64.3% vs 52.6%, P = .02) significantly increased HFSR incidence. Moreover, combination with chemotherapy exerted a minimal effect on HFSR risk (61% vs 55.3%, P = .5). This updated review and meta-analysis confirm the increased risk of HFSR incidence due to the use of MKIs and antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody. Thus, using these therapies requires safety standards.

Topical Silymarin Administration for Prevention of Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a frequent dose-limiting adverse reaction of capecitabine in patient with gastrointestinal cancers. Silymarin is a polyphenolic flavonoid extracted from the Silybum marianum that exhibits strong antioxidant and antiinflammatory activities. In this study, we evaluated silymarin efficacy in prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS in patients with gastrointestinal cancers, as the first human study. During this pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the effect of silymarin gel 1%, which is applied on the palms and soles twice daily starting at the first day of chemotherapy for 9 weeks, on HFS occurrence was assessed. Forty patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria assigned to the silymarin or placebo group. World Health Organization HFS grading scale scores were recorded at baseline and every 3 weeks during these 9 weeks. The median WHO HFS scores were significantly lower in silymarin group at the end of the 9th week (p < 0.05). The scores increased significantly in both placebo and silymarin groups during chemotherapy, but there was a delay for HFS development and progression in silymarin group. Prophylactic administration of silymarin topical formulation could significantly reduce the severity of capecitabine-induced HFS and delays its occurrence in patients with gastrointestinal cancer after 9 weeks of application. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and radical surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: 10-year experiences at a single institution

PURPOSE

Oral capecitabine has demonstrated to be safe and efficient as neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery.

METHODS

From January 2000 to June 2010, 238 patients were treated at our center for locally advanced rectal cancers using conventional NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the factors associated with oncologic outcomes with log rank and Cox regression tests.

RESULTS

The incidence of grade >3 capecitabine-related toxicity was found to be 4.6%. A pathologic complete response was observed in 14.7% of patients. The 5-year overall and 5-year disease-free survival rate, local and systemic recurrence rate were 82.8%, 75.1%, 4.8%, and 20.3%. Abdominoperineal resection and node-positive disease were independent prognostic factors of 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

NCRT with capecitabine and radical surgery showed favorable long-term oncologic outcomes with benefits of acceptable toxicity and convenience. We suggest that capecitabine can be one of the favorable therapeutic options for NCRT in rectal cancer.

Pyridoxine treatment and prevention of hand-and-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine

Background. Capecitabine is a novel fluoropyrimidine administered orally for treatment of gastrointestinal and breast malignancies. Toxicity described with capecitabine includes hand-and-foot syndrome (HFS), a potentially painful inflammation of the hands and feet. Pyridoxine has been reported to produce improvement in HFS symptoms. We conducted our study to determine the incidence and severity of HFS symptoms in capecitabine patients and to assess the effects of pyridoxine administered as prophylaxis or treatment.

Patients and methods. We retrospectively reviewed 99 charts of capecitabine patients receiving pyridoxine and 99 charts of those who had not.

Results. Of the 99 pyridoxine patients, 73 (74%) received it as prophylaxis, with the remainder receiving pyridoxine as acute HFS treatment. The median number of capecitabine cycles administered was five, with first-reported HFS onset at cycle 2 in those receiving pyridoxine prophylaxis versus 1.5 in those not (P 5 0.06). Incidence was significantly associated with capecitabine dose, with 76% of patients experiencing HFS in the highest dose ranges compared with 40% in the lowest (P B 0.01). The data did not support that pyridoxine prophylaxis prevented overall HFS incidence in a greater proportion of patients compared with those who did not receive prophylaxis (60% versus 53%, respectively, P 5 NS). However, when used as treatment, a greater proportion of patients receiving pyridoxine reported symptom improvement compared with those not receiving the agent (65% versus 12%, P B0.001). No differences in 12-week tumor response were seen.

Conclusion. The data do not support the use of pyridoxine as prophylaxis as neither the incidence nor the severity of HFS was affected. Once HFS develops, however, pyridoxine may provide some relief of HFS symptoms. A controlled trial of capecitabine with and without pyridoxine seems warranted.

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia

Objective. To provide a comprehensive review of the chemotherapy induced dermatological toxi-city, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), including clinical presentation, drugs implication in causing the reaction, and approaches for management.

Data sources. A search of MEDLINE (1966-2002), IDIS (1985- 2002) and CANCERLIT (1993-2002) databases was conducted using the terms (and variations of the terms) palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hand-foot syndrome, and acral erythema. Bibliographies from selected articles were also reviewed for appropriate references.

Data extraction. The retrieved literature was reviewed to include all articles pertaining to the incidence, clinical presentation, mechanism, pathology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of PPE.

Data synthesis. PPE is a distinctive, localized cutaneous reaction to certain antineoplastic agents. A number of drugs have been implicated, including most commonly cytarabine, fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and capecitabine. There appears to be an association with administration schedules that lead to elevated peak plasma concentrations, such as in high-dose therapy, or after prolonged periods of constant exposure, as with continuous infusions, regular oral dosing, or liposomal formulations. The extent and severity of the reaction, time of onset, and duration are variable. Symptoms can occur to both hands and feet, and include dysesthesia, paresthesia, erythema, swelling, pain, blistering, ulceration, and desquamination. Cessation of the offending agent appears to be the most important step in the management of PPE. Dose modification may be necessary for subsequent cycles. As the course of PPE is self-limiting, treatment is commonly supportive and based on the type and severity of symptoms encountered. This can include analgesia, emollient or soothing creams, wound care, and cold compresses. Administration of corticosteroids has produced mixed results. Pyridoxine shows promise as both a treatment and preventative strategy, although confirmation in prospective clinical trials is needed. Advice should be provided to patients to ensure prompt recognition of toxicity and plans for prevention and amelioration of symptoms provided.

Pharmacokinetics and exposure-effect relationships of capecitabine in elderly patients with breast or colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were (1) to investigate the impact of great age on pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites and (2) to evaluate the exposure-effect relationship of capecitabine in elderly patients.

METHODS

Data collected from 20 elderly patients (75-92 years old) with breast or colorectal cancer who received oral capecitabine were analyzed. In order to study the old age effect on pharmacokinetics, data collected from two phase I studies involving 40 younger adults (<75 years old) with metastatic cancer who received oral capecitabine were added in the database. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was based on a four-compartment model describing the sequence of capecitabine and three of its metabolites.

RESULTS

The absorption rate constant was found lower in the oldest patient group (≥75 years) compared with the youngest group, and the constant rate elimination of the 5-fluorouracil metabolite was found decreased over time (i.e., after 2 consecutive weeks of capecitabine administration). This time effect was not found different between the two age groups. In elderly patients, the exposure-safety analysis showed, from the second cycle of chemotherapy, significantly higher median exposures of capecitabine and its metabolites (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and 5-fluorouracil) in patients who experienced hand-foot syndrome compared with patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

This study puts forward new arguments for the treatment of elderly cancer patients who could benefit from capecitabine chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity.

A Phase II Study of Additional Four-Week Chemotherapy With Capecitabine During the Resting Periods After Six-Week Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m² twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy.

Results

Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes.

Conclusion

This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.

Prophylactic pyridoxine was not able to reduce the incidence of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A meta-analysis

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting adverse event of capecitabine, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of capecitabine-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. Although pyridoxine has been used for the prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS, its efficacy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic pyridoxine reduces the incidence of capecitabine-associated HFS by performing a meta-analysis of the literature involving available studies. Systematic searches for trials were undertaken through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, updated to March, 2013, to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine against capecitabine-induced HFS. We performed a meta-analysis of five studies (n=793 patients) that evaluated the efficacy of the prophylactic use of pyridoxine in cancer patients treated with capecitabine. The odds ratio (OR) comparing prophylactic pyridoxine to placebo was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.24] for HFS of all grades; OR=1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) for HFS ≥ grade 2 and OR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.60-1.85) for HFS ≥ grade 3. Based on our meta-analysis, prophylactic pyridoxine did not appear to reduce the incidence of HFS in patients receiving capecitabine.

Development and validation of a prediction index for hand-foot skin reaction in cancer patients receiving sorafenib

BACKGROUND

This study describes a repeated measures prediction index to identify patients at high risk of ≥grade 2 hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) before each week of sorafenib therapy.

METHODS

Data from 451 patients who received a sorafenib (400 mg bid) as part of a clinical trial were reviewed (Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al. Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 125-134). Generalized estimating equations were used to develop the final risk model. A risk-scoring algorithm (range 0-58) was then derived from the final model coefficients. External validation was then carried out on a new sample of 1145 patients who received sorafenib under an expanded access program.

RESULTS

Pretreatment white blood cell count, female gender, good performance status, presence of lung and liver metastases and number of affected organs were predictors for ≥grade 2 HFSR. A nonlinear association between HFSR risk and treatment duration was also identified where risk was maximized at week 5 followed by a gradual decline. Before each week of therapy, patients with risk scores>40 would be considered at high risk for developing ≥grade 2 HFSR.

CONCLUSIONS

The application and planned continued refinement of this prediction tool will be an important source of patient-specific risk information for the development of moderate to severe HFSR.

Radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and combined capecitabine and nimotuzumab treatment for lung metastases in a liver transplantation recipient: a case experience of sustained complete response

The primary treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is external beam radiotherapy. However, until now, there is little experience with the management of NPC occurred after solid organ transplantation. In this report, a 60-year-old man was found to have NPC (T2N1M0; stage III) 3 years after orthotopic liver transplantation treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was performed for NPC. One month after IMRT, complete response of NPC was achieved. However, multiple lung metastases occurred 18 months after the IMRT with the largest lesion measuring 4.1×5.5 cm and confirmed to be originated from NPC. Combined chemo-/targeted therapy consisted of capecitabine, and nimotuzumab was administered for four cycles. One month after initiation of capecitabine plus nimotuzumab treatment, a near-complete response was achieved for lung metastases. A repeat CT scan 1 year later showed sustained resolution of the lung metastases. The patient is still alive 16 months after the combined chemo-/targeted therapy.

Incidence of hand-foot syndrome with capecitabine in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer suitable for treatment with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen

INTRODUCTION

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a limiting toxicity of capecitabine, which is not life-threatening but could compromise capecitabine efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase II, multicenter, non-controlled study assessed the safety, particularly grade three HFS incidence, and efficacy of four capecitabine-based chemotherapy regimens [cisplatin/capecitabine (CX), epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine (ECX), epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (EOX) and docetaxel/cisplatin/capecitabine (DCX)] as first-line treatment for advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were assigned to one of the four treatment groups, according to investigator's criteria, and grouped together for both safety and efficacy primary analyses. HFS was reported in 31 patients (19.6%) and its first presentation occurred at a median of 72 days (range 19-209 days). Grade 3 HFS developed in 6.3, 5.2, 3.7 and 2.4%, of patients receiving ECX, DCX, EOX or CX chemotherapy regimen, respectively. Capecitabine dose reduction/discontinuation due to HFS was required in 5.7% of patients (9/158). The most common (> 10%) grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (15.2%), asthenia (12.0%) and diarrhoea (11.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

A moderate incidence of HFS was reported in patients treated with capecitabine, which generally presented late and required dose reduction in < 1/3 of patients. The results suggest that capecitabine may be useful in combination with standard fluorouracil-based regimens in patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer with favourable safety profile.

Celecoxib can prevent capecitabine-related hand-foot syndrome in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients: result of a single-center, prospective randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse event induced by capecitabine. Some clinicians think that HFS is a type of inflammation limited to the hands and feet and can be prevented with a COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib).

METHODS

We designed a single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis. From August 2008 to December 2010, stage II and III colorectal cancer patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy enrolled in the trial voluntarily. All patients were divided randomly into two groups treated with or without celecoxib. All adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Grade 1 and grade 2 HFS were more common in the capecitabine group than in the capecitabine/celecoxib group (74.6% versus 57.4%, P = 0.034, 29.6% versus 14.7% P = 0.035). The use of celecoxib (P < 0.001, P = 0.003) and the level of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (P = 0.048, P = 0.014) affected the incidence of grade 1 and 2 HFS, as determined by log-rank analysis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that the use of celecoxib was the only factor that affected the incidence of ≥ grade 1 HFS [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.556, P = 0.001] and ≥ grade 2 HFS (HR: 0.414, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Celecoxib can be used effectively and safely to prevent capecitabine-related HFS.

Correlation of capecitabine-induced skin toxicity with treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the German AIO KRK-0104 trial

Background:

The AIO KRK-0104 randomised phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two capecitabine-based regimens: combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (CAPIRI) plus cetuximab (CAPIRI-C) and combination of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) plus cetuximab (CAPOX-C) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment-related skin toxicity (ST) was evaluated separately for capecitabine and cetuximab. The present analysis investigates the correlation of capecitabine-attributed ST (Cape-ST) and parameters of treatment efficacy.

Methods:

Patients with mCRC were randomised to cetuximab (400 mg m⁻², day 1, followed by 250 mg m⁻² weekly) plus CAPIRI (irinotecan 200 mg m⁻², day 1; capecitabine 800 mg m⁻², twice daily, days 1–14, every 3 weeks), or cetuximab plus CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg m⁻², day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg m⁻², twice daily, days 1–14, every 3 weeks).

Results:

Of 185 recruited patients, 149 (CAPIRI-C, n=78; CAPOX-C, n=71) received study treatment beyond the first tumour assessment and were evaluable for efficacy. Capecitabine-attributed ST, predominantly hand–foot syndrome, was observed in 32.2% of patients. Capecitabine-attributed ST grade 1–3 was associated with a significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) (97.9 vs 86.1%, P=0.038) compared with grade 0 toxicity. Moreover, Cape-ST grade 1–3 related to a markedly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (9.9 vs 5.6 months, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (32.8 vs 22.4 months, P=0.008). Separate analyses of treatment arms indicated that the effect of Cape-ST on PFS remained significant for both arms, whereas the effect on OS remained apparent as a strong trend.

Conclusion:

This analysis supports the hypothesis that for the evaluated regimens, a correlation exists between Cape-ST and treatment efficacy regarding DCR, PFS, and OS.

Chemotherapy-induced palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome: etiology and emerging therapies

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, or hand-foot syndrome (HFS), is emerging as a common, dose-dependent toxicity of many newer chemotherapy drugs. Frequently, HFS is a dose-limiting toxicity requiring discontinuation of treatment, chemotherapy dose reductions, or delays. The spectrum of symptoms of HFS can be mild, with erythema of the distal extremities, or it can be severe enough to interfere with activities of daily living. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, there are several approaches to ameliorating the symptoms of this complication. These include antiinflammatory agents, vitamin products, and peripheral vasoconstricting agents.

An unusual case of capecitabine hyperpigmentation: Is hyperpigmentation a part of hand-foot syndrome or a separate entity?

A 59-year-old man with adenocarcinoma of stomach was prescribed capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy. After two cycles of therapy, patient developed hyperpigmentation on hands and feet. Examination revealed a peculiar distribution of hyperpigmentation on hands and feet and in addition, hyperpigmented spots on the dorsum of tongue. Although hand-foot syndrome (HFS) to capecitabine solely manifesting as palmoplantar hyperpigmentation has been described earlier, this is probably the first instance wherein oral pigmentation has also been found in association. In addition, this finding lends support to the growing argument of hyperpigmentation being a separate entity: different from HFS, both therefore being separate adverse effects of the same drug.

Placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a urea/lactic acid-based topical keratolytic agent for prevention of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N05C5

PURPOSE

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine for which no effective preventative treatment has been definitively demonstrated. This trial was conducted on the basis of preliminary data that a urea/lactic acid-based topical keratolytic agent (ULABTKA) may prevent HFS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized, double-blind phase III trial evaluated 137 patients receiving their first ever cycle of capecitabine at a dose of either 2,000 or 2,500 mg/m(2) per day for 14 days. Patients were randomly assigned to a ULABTKA versus a placebo cream, which was applied to the hands and feet twice per day for 21 days after the start of capecitabine. Patients completed an HFS diary (HFSD) daily. HFS toxicity grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v3.0) was also collected at baseline and at the end of each cycle. The primary end point was the incidence of moderate/severe HFS symptoms in the first treatment cycle, based on the patient-reported HFSD.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with moderate/severe HFS symptoms was not different between groups, being 13.6% in the ULABTKA arm and 10.2% in the placebo arm (P = .768 by Fisher's exact test). The odds ratio was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.37 to 5.76). Cycle 1 CTCAE skin toxicity was higher in the ULABTKA arm but not significantly so (33% v 27%; P = .82). No significant differences were observed in other toxicities between groups.

CONCLUSION

These data do not support the efficacy of a ULABTKA cream for preventing HFS symptoms in patients receiving capecitabine.

Pyridoxine to protect from oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity without compromising antitumour effect

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin (OHP) in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) is clinically used as frontline therapy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC), with response rates ranging from 46 to 71%. This combination is now considered a standard treatment for metastatic CRC and also in the post-operative adjuvant setting. Reversible, cumulative, peripheral sensory neuropathy is the principal dose-limiting toxicity of OHP therapy. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) has been shown to reduce cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine-related neurotoxicity but its administration with OHP has not yet been studied. Low doses of pyridoxine are free of side effects; it can be given orally. If pyridoxine administration with oxaliplatin has no adverse effect on OHP cytotoxicity effects, it will be a simple and cost-effective way to minimise OHP-induced neurotoxicity.

METHODS

In vitro simultaneous combination of OHP and pyridoxine was studied in 6 CRC cell lines (HT29, Widr, SW480, HCT116, H630 and SW1116), in an ovarian cancer cell line (A2780) and its cisplatin-resistant subline (ADDP) and in an oestrogen-dependent breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). Three fixed concentrations of pyridoxine: 1, 10 and 25 μM were combined with varying concentrations of OHP, and the growth inhibitory effects were evaluated using the MTT cell growth assay.

RESULTS

Oxaliplatin induced consistent cytotoxicity in all cell lines with GI(50) values between 0.23 and 7.6 μM. Addition of pyridoxine at concentrations of 1-25 μM does not affect OHP cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of pyridoxine, at concentrations extending across possible therapeutic plasma levels in humans, does not antagonise OHP antitumour effects in a range of relevant tumour cell lines. This study provides a foundation for clinical studies to test whether pyridoxine can minimise OHP-related neurotoxicity, and clinicians can be confident that pyridoxine is very unlikely to reverse the antitumour effects of OHP, as seems to be the case with Ca/Mg infusions. This could prove to be a cost-effective way to minimise OHP-related neurotoxicity, allowing more effective less toxic treatment and better outcomes in patients.

Pyridoxine Is Not Effective to Prevent Hand-Foot Syndrome Associated With Capecitabine Therapy: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Purpose

To determine whether concurrent pyridoxine therapy can prevent the development of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in patients being treated with capecitabine.

Methods

Chemotherapy-naive patients with GI tract cancers scheduled for capecitabine-containing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to concurrent oral pyridoxine (200 mg/d) or placebo. Patients were stratified by chemotherapy regimen and monitored until development of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 2 or worse HFS or capecitabine-containing chemotherapy ended. Patients in the placebo group who developed grade 2 or worse HFS were randomly assigned again to receive pyridoxine or placebo in the next chemotherapy cycle to determine whether pyridoxine could improve HFS.

Results

The median number of chemotherapy cycles to grade 2 or worse HFS was three in both groups. Grade 2 or worse HFS developed in 55 (30.6%) of 180 placebo-treated patients and in 57 (31.7%) of 180 pyridoxine patients. The cumulative dose of capecitabine to grade 2 or worse HFS was not different between the two groups (median not reached in either group; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; P = .788). Randomization of the 44 patients in the placebo group with grade 2 or worse HFS to placebo or pyridoxine for the next cycle resulted in no significant difference in the proportion showing improvement of HFS (42.9% v 47.8%; HR = 1.12; P = .94). By multivariate analysis, age ≥ 56 years (HR = 1.768; 95% CI, 1.190 to 2.628; P = .005) was an independent risk factor for grade 2 or worse HFS, and combined use of docetaxel (HR = 2.046; 95% CI, 0.880 to 4.755; P = .096) was of borderline significance.

Conclusion

Pyridoxine is not effective in prevention of capecitabine-associated HFS.

The hand-foot-syndrome associated with medical tumor therapy - classification and management

The hand-foot-syndrome (HFS, palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, chemotherapy-associated acral erythema) is characterized by painful predominantly palmo-plantar lesions. The association with different chemotherapeutic agents has been known for over 20 years. More recently, HFS has been reported in association with regimens using targeted agents, in particular the multikinase inhibitors (MKI) sorafenib and sunitinib. The HFS associated with MKI has a different distribution and clinical appearance than the traditional disorder. In this review, similarities and differences between chemotherapy- and MKI-associated HFS are discussed and current recommendations for their prophylaxis and management are summarized.

Benefits and risks of palliative capecitabine based therapy to elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Danish single centre experiences

This study aimed to compare efficacy and toxicity of palliative chemotherapy for elderly and younger colorectal cancer patients. Patients aged 24-69 (n = 203) and 70-82 years (n = 57) with advanced colorectal cancer were consequetively treated with first line capecitabine monotherapy or combined with oxaliplatin (XELOX). The response rates were 37% and 33% (P = 0.61), the median times to progression were 5.5 and 6.0 months (P = 0.84, hazard ratio (HR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.71-1.68), and median overall survival times were 8.4 and 12.5 months (P = 0.07, HR 1.48; 1.04-2.38) for elderly and younger patients, respectively. Elderly patients had similar frequencies of Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or 4 toxicity (P > 0.05) and number of treatment courses (P = 0.44), and maintained performance status as well as younger patients (P = 0.68). Palliative capecitabine based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer should be considered also for elderly who are in good performance without major comorbidities.