Active RB causes visible changes in nuclear organization

Patterns in the tapestry of chromatin-bound RB

The retinoblastoma protein (RB)-mediated regulation of E2F is a component of a highly conserved cell cycle machine. However, RB's tumor suppressor activity, like RB's requirement in animal development, is tissue-specific, context-specific, and sometimes appears uncoupled from cell proliferation. Detailed new information about RB's genomic distribution provides a new perspective on the complexity of RB function, suggesting that some of its functional specificity results from context-specific RB association with chromatin. Here we summarize recent evidence showing that RB targets different types of chromatin regulatory elements at different cell cycle stages. RB controls traditional RB/E2F targets prior to S-phase, but, when cells proliferate, RB redistributes to cell type-specific chromatin loci. We discuss the broad implications of the new data for RB research.

Cell cycle gene alterations associate with a redistribution of mutation risk across chromosomal domains in human cancers

Mutations in human cells exhibit increased burden in heterochromatic, late DNA replication time (RT) chromosomal domains, with variation in mutation rates between tissues mirroring variation in heterochromatin and RT. We observed that regional mutation risk further varies between individual tumors in a manner independent of cell type, identifying three signatures of domain-scale mutagenesis in >4,000 tumor genomes. The major signature reflects remodeling of heterochromatin and of the RT program domains seen across tumors, tissues and cultured cells, and is robustly linked with higher expression of cell proliferation genes. Regional mutagenesis is associated with loss of activity of the tumor-suppressor genes RB1 and TP53, consistent with their roles in cell cycle control, with distinct mutational patterns generated by the two genes. Loss of regional heterogeneity in mutagenesis is associated with deficiencies in various DNA repair pathways. These mutation risk redistribution processes modify the mutation supply towards important genes, diverting the course of somatic evolution.

Cancer takes many paths through G1/S

In the commonly accepted paradigm for control of the mammalian cell cycle, sequential cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and cyclin activities drive the orderly transition from G1 to S phase. However, recent studies using different technological approaches and examining a broad range of cancer cell types are challenging this established paradigm. An alternative model is evolving in which cell cycles utilize different drivers and take different trajectories through the G1/S transition. We are discovering that cancer cells in particular can adapt their drivers and trajectories, which has important implications for antiproliferative therapies. These studies have helped to refine an understanding of how CDK inhibition impinges on proliferation and have significance for understanding fundamental features of cell biology and cancer.

Dual regulations of cell cycle regulator DPa by auxin in Arabidopsis root distal stem cell maintenance

The plant hormone auxin plays a key role to maintain root stem cell identity which is essential for root development. However, the molecular mechanism by which auxin regulates root distal stem cell (DSC) identity is not well understood. In this study, we revealed that the cell cycle factor DPa is a vital regulator in the maintenance of root DSC identity through multiple auxin signaling cascades. On the one hand, auxin positively regulates the transcription of DPa via AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 7 and ARF19. On the other hand, auxin enhances the protein stability of DPa through MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 3 (MPK3)/MPK6-mediated phosphorylation. Consistently, mutation of the identified three threonine residues (Thr10, Thr25, and Thr227) of DPa to nonphosphorylated form alanine (DPa3A) highly decreased the phosphorylation level of DPa, which decreased its protein stability and affected the maintenance of root DSC identity. Taken together, this study provides insight into the molecular mechanism of how auxin regulates root distal stem cell identity through the dual regulations of DPa at both transcriptional and posttranslational levels.

Seeing is believing: the impact of RB on nuclear organization

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) prevents G1 to S cell cycle transition by inhibiting E2F activity. This function requires that RB remains un- or underphosphorylated (the so-called active forms of RB). Recently, we showed that active forms of RB cause widespread changes in nuclear architecture that are visible under a microscope. These phenotypes did not correlate with cell cycle arrest or repression of the E2F transcriptional program, but appeared later, and were associated with the appearance of autophagy or in IMR-90 cells with senescence markers. In this perspective, we describe the relative timing of these RB-induced events and discuss the mechanisms that may underlie RB-induced chromatin dispersion. We consider the relationship between RB-induced dispersion, autophagy, and senescence and the potential connection between dispersion and cell cycle exit.

Chromatin-bound protein colocalization analysis using bedGraph2Cluster and PanChIP

Computational pipelines for chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis can neglect colocalization events that occur in a mere subset of the genome. Here, we detail a streamlined approach for assessing colocalization of chromatin-bound proteins using the bedGraph2Cluster and PanChIP algorithms. Using histone modifications as an example, bedGraph2Cluster performs clustering analysis on chromatin binding patterns of target proteins. PanChIP then compares these clusters with a reference library of chromatin binding patterns and measures the overlap in peaks, capturing the heterogeneity in chromatin binding and colocalization patterns. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Sanidas et al. (2022).1.

Cell cycle exits and U-turns: Quiescence as multiple reversible forms of arrest

Cell proliferation control is essential during development and for maintaining adult tissues. Loss of that control promotes not only oncogenesis when cells proliferate inappropriately but also developmental abnormalities or degeneration when cells fail to proliferate when and where needed. To ensure that cells are produced at the right place and time, an intricate balance of pro-proliferative and anti-proliferative signals impacts the probability that cells undergo cell cycle exit to quiescence, or G₀ phase. This brief review describes recent advances in our understanding of how and when quiescence is initiated and maintained in mammalian cells. We highlight the growing appreciation for quiescence as a collection of context-dependent distinct states.

Cancer cell cycle dystopia: heterogeneity, plasticity, and therapy

The mammalian cell cycle has been extensively studied regarding cancer etiology, progression, and therapeutic intervention. The canonical cell cycle framework is supported by a plethora of data pointing to a relatively simple linear pathway in which mitogenic signals are integrated in a stepwise fashion to allow progression through G1/S with coordinate actions of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK)4/6 and CDK2 on the RB tumor suppressor. Recent work on adaptive mechanisms and intrinsic heterogeneous dependencies indicates that G1/S control of the cell cycle is a variable signaling pathway rather than an invariant engine that drives cell division. These alterations can limit the effectiveness of pharmaceutical agents but provide new avenues for therapeutic interventions. These findings support a dystopian view of the cell cycle in cancer where the canonical utopian cell cycle is often not observed. However, recognizing the extent of cell cycle heterogeneity likely creates new opportunities for precision therapeutic approaches specifically targeting these states.

Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling

The retinoblastoma protein RB and the transcription factor p53 are central tumor suppressors. They are often found inactivated in various tumor types. Both proteins play central roles in regulating the cell division cycle. RB forms complexes with the E2F family of transcription factors and downregulates numerous genes. Among the RB-E2F target genes, a large number code for key cell cycle regulators. Their transcriptional repression by the RB-E2F complex is released through phosphorylation of RB, leading to expression of the cell cycle regulators. The release from repression can be prevented by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21/CDKN1A. The CDKN1A gene is transcriptionally activated by p53. Taken together, these elements constitute the p53-p21-RB signaling pathway. Following activation of p53, for example by viral infection or induction of DNA damage, p21 expression is upregulated. High levels of p21 then result in RB-E2F complex formation and downregulation of a large number of cell cycle genes. Thus, p53-dependent transcriptional repression is indirect. The reduced expression of the many regulators leads to cell cycle arrest. Examination of the p53-p21-RB targets and genes controlled by the related p53-p21-DREAM signaling pathway reveals that there is a large overlap of the two groups. Mechanistically this can be explained by replacing RB-E2F complexes with the DREAM transcriptional repressor complex at E2F sites in target promoters. In contrast to RB-E2F, DREAM can downregulate genes also through CHR transcription factor binding sites. This results in a distinct gene set controlled by p53-p21-DREAM signaling independent of RB-E2F. Furthermore, RB has non-canonical functions without binding to E2F and DNA. Such a role of RB supporting DREAM formation may be exerted by the RB-SKP2-p27-cyclin A/E-CDK2-p130-DREAM link. In the current synopsis, the mechanism of regulation by p53-p21-RB signaling is assessed and the overlap with p53-p21-DREAM signaling is examined.

Retinoblastoma-E2F Transcription Factor Interplay Is Essential for Testicular Development and Male Fertility

The retinoblastoma (RB) protein family members (pRB, p107 and p130) are key regulators of cell cycle progression, but also play crucial roles in apoptosis, and stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. RB proteins exert their effects through binding to E2F transcription factors, which are essential developmental and physiological regulators of tissue and organ homeostasis. According to the canonical view, phosphorylation of RB results in release of E2Fs and induction of genes needed for progress of the cell cycle. However, there are eight members in the E2F transcription factor family with both activator (E2F1-3a) and repressor (E2F3b-E2F8) roles, highlighting the functional diversity of RB-E2F pathway. In this review article we summarize the data showing that RB-E2F interaction is a key cell-autonomous mechanism responsible for establishment and maintenance of lifelong male fertility. We also review the expression pattern of RB proteins and E2F transcription factors in the testis and male germ cells. The available evidence supports that RB and E2F family members are widely and dynamically expressed in the testis, and they are known to have versatile roles during spermatogenesis. Knowledge of the function and significance of RB-E2F interplay for testicular development and spermatogenesis comes primarily from gene knock-out (KO) studies. Several studies conducted in Sertoli cell-specific pRB-KO mice have demonstrated that pRB-mediated inhibition of E2F3 is essential for Sertoli cell functional maturation and cell cycle exit, highlighting that RB-E2F interaction in Sertoli cells is paramount to male fertility. Similarly, ablation of either pRB or E2F1 in the germline results in progressive testicular atrophy due to germline stem cell (GSC) depletion, emphasizing the importance of proper RB-E2F interplay for germline maintenance and lifelong sperm production. In summary, while balanced RB-E2F interplay is essential for cell-autonomous maintenance of GSCs and, the pRB-E2F3 system in Sertoli cells is critical for providing GSC niche thus laying the basis for spermatogenesis.