1
|
Herrera-Añazco P, Benites-Meza JK, Caira-Chuquineyra B, Fernandez-Guzman D, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, Benites-Zapata VA. Ethnic Minority Participation in Clinical Trials from Latin America and the Caribbean: A Scoping Review. J Immigr Minor Health 2024; 26:604-622. [PMID: 38294634 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-023-01578-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
We summarize the clinical trials (CTs) main characteristics, including members of ethnic minorities from Latin America. We carried out a systematic search in six databases. We made a descriptive synthesis of CTs, summarizing the characteristics, interventions, main findings, results, and conclusions reported. 4411 studies were acquired in search strategy, leaving 24 CTs in the final selection. Of these, ten were randomized, four were non-randomized, and the remainder had other designs. Most of the studies were carried out in the population of infants and children (08), ten of the studies included only women, and two studies included men. Nine studies were conducted in Mexico, with the Mayan ethnic minority being mostly evaluated (05). In only 15 it was mentioned that their research was approved by a research ethics committee. Finally, half of the CTs reported funding from international agencies and third reported funding from government agencies. Our results show that that CTs in ethnic minorities are limited and reduced to a few native peoples of the continent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jerry K Benites-Meza
- Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de La Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | | | | | - Enrique A Hernandez-Bustamante
- Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de La Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Vicente A Benites-Zapata
- Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
- Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Campus 2, avenida La Fontana 750, La Molina, Lima, Peru.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hetherington D, Wilson NJ, Dixon K, Murphy G. Emergency department Nurses' narratives of burnout: Changing roles and boundaries. Int Emerg Nurs 2024; 74:101439. [PMID: 38581856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emergency department nurses work in rapidly changing environments, which can contribute to occupational stress. Emergency department nurses utilise diverse strategies to mediate the impact of stress on their daily lives. There is a paucity of qualitative research which explores emergency department nurses' experiences and perspectives of burnout. This study aimed to explore emergency department nurses' experiences of burnout. Further, the study considered how emergency nurses conceptualised burnout and the strategies they used to manage the professional and personal effects of burnout. PROCEDURES The COREQ research guidelines were used throughout the study from the design stage through to dissemination. Narrative inquiry was used as the underpinning theoretical framework. The researcher met individually with eight emergency department nurses from NSW hospitals to undertake a face-to-face semi-structured interview. An inductive approach was used to establish major themes within the narrative. FINDINGS Two major themes were established: experiencing conflicting emotions and trying to establish a personal sense of control. Emergency nurses felt passionate about their professional roles, yet encountered difficulties due to management structures, time constraints and a sense of underappreciation. The misalignment between their expectations and the reality of emergency department nursing, resulted in experiences of burnout such as dissatisfaction and frustrations at work. Consequently, these nurses adopted diverse strategies within both their professional and personal domains. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS The conclusions of this study are transferable to a variety of acute health services. Health service management have a role to promote a positive workplace culture for nurses, which advocates for home life balance. This will support nurses to construct clear boundaries between professional identity and their personal lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Hetherington
- Master of Research (MRes), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia.
| | - Nathan J Wilson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia.
| | - Kathleen Dixon
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia.
| | - Gillian Murphy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Orievulu K, Hinga A, Nkosi B, Ngwenya N, Seeley J, Akanlu A, Tindana P, Molyneux S, Kinyanjui S, Kamuya D. A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:63. [PMID: 38778293 PMCID: PMC11110293 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic forced governments, multilateral public health organisations and research institutions to undertake research quickly to inform their responses to the pandemic. Most COVID-19-related studies required swift approval, creating ethical and practical challenges for regulatory authorities and researchers. In this paper, we examine the landscape of ethics review processes in Africa during public health emergencies (PHEs). METHODS We searched four electronic databases (Web of Science, PUBMED, MEDLINE Complete, and CINAHL) to identify articles describing ethics review processes during public health emergencies and/or pandemics. We selected and reviewed those articles that were focused on Africa. We charted the data from the retrieved articles including the authors and year of publication, title, country and disease(s) reference, broad areas of (ethical) consideration, paper type, and approach. RESULTS Of an initial 4536 records retrieved, we screened the titles and abstracts of 1491 articles, and identified 72 articles for full review. Nine articles were selected for inclusion. Of these nine articles, five referenced West African countries including Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, and experiences linked to the Ebola virus disease. Two articles focused on South Africa and Kenya, while the other two articles discussed more general experiences and pitfalls of ethics review during PHEs in Africa more broadly. We found no articles published on ethics review processes in Africa before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, and only a few before the COVID-19 outbreak. Although guidelines on protocol review and approval processes for PHEs were more frequently discussed after the 2014 Ebola outbreak, these did not focus on Africa specifically. CONCLUSIONS There is a gap in the literature about ethics review processes and preparedness within Africa during PHEs. This paper underscores the importance of these processes to inform practices that facilitate timely, context-relevant research that adequately recognises and reinforces human dignity within the quest to advance scientific knowledge about diseases. This is important to improve fast responses to PHEs, reduce mortality and morbidity, and enhance the quality of care before, during, and after pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kingsley Orievulu
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
- Centre for Africa China Studies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Alex Hinga
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Busisiwe Nkosi
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- University of Toledo, Ohio, Toledo, USA
| | - Nothando Ngwenya
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Janet Seeley
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- Global Health and Development Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anthony Akanlu
- West Africa Centre for Cell Biology and Infectious Pathogens, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Paulina Tindana
- Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Pandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Samson Kinyanjui
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Pandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Pandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin S, Ancillotti M, Slokenberga S, Matar A. A comparative ethical analysis of the Egyptian clinical research law. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:48. [PMID: 38689214 PMCID: PMC11059645 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01040-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we examined the ethical implications of Egypt's new clinical trial law, employing the ethical framework proposed by Emanuel et al. and comparing it to various national and supranational laws. This analysis is crucial as Egypt, considered a high-growth pharmaceutical market, has become an attractive location for clinical trials, offering insights into the ethical implementation of bioethical regulations in a large population country with a robust healthcare infrastructure and predominantly treatment-naïve patients. METHODS We conducted a comparative analysis of Egyptian law with regulations from Sweden and France, including the EU Clinical Trials Regulation, considering ethical human subject research criteria, and used a directed approach to qualitative content analysis to examine the laws and regulations. This study involved extensive peer scrutiny, frequent debriefing sessions, and collaboration with legal experts with relevant international legal expertise to ensure rigorous analysis and interpretation of the laws. RESULTS On the rating of the seven different principles (social and scientific values, scientific validity, fair selection of participants, risk-benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent and respect for participants) Egypt, France, and EU regulations had comparable scores. Specific principles (Social Value, Scientific Value, and Fair selection of participants) were challenging to directly identify due to certain regulations embodying 'implicit' principles more than explicitly stated ones. CONCLUSION The analysis underscores Egypt's alignment with internationally recognized ethical principles, as outlined by Emanuel et al., through its comparison with French, Swedish, and EU regulations, emphasizing the critical need for Egypt to continuously refine its ethical regulations to safeguard participant protection and research integrity. Key issues identified include the necessity to clarify and standardize the concept of social value in research, alongside concerns regarding the expertise and impartiality of ethical review boards, pointing towards a broader agenda for enhancing research ethics in Egypt and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Martin
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Mirko Ancillotti
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Amal Matar
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iseselo MK, Tarimo EAM. Comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in registration cohorts for phase IIb HIV vaccine trial in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:29. [PMID: 38481301 PMCID: PMC10935914 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01033-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent as stipulated in regulatory human research guidelines requires volunteers to be well-informed about what will happen to them in a trial. However, researchers may be faced with the challenge of how to ensure that a volunteer agreeing to take part in a clinical trial is truly informed. This study aimed to find out volunteers' comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) clinical trials during the registration cohort. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study among volunteers who were enrolled in the registration cohort of HIV clinical trials in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A purposive sampling strategy was used to obtain twenty study participants. The data were collected between June and September 2020 using a semi-structured interview guide. In-depth interviews were used to collect the data to obtain deep insights of the individual study participants on the comprehension of informed consent and participation in the clinical trial. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data. Themes and subthemes were supported by the quotes from the participants. RESULTS Volunteers described comprehension of informed consent from different perspectives. They reported that various components of the informed consent such as study procedure, confidentiality, risk and benefits were grasped during engagement meetings. Furthermore, the volunteers' decision to participate in the registration cohort was voluntary. However, trial aspects such as health insurance, free condoms, and medical checkups could have indirectly influenced their reluctance to withdraw from the study. CONCLUSION Engagement meetings may increase the comprehension of informed consent among potential participants for HIV clinical trials. However, trial incentives may influence participation, and thus future research should focus on the challenges of giving incentives in the study. This will ensure comprehension and voluntary participation in the context of HIV clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masunga K Iseselo
- Department of Clinical Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Edith A M Tarimo
- Department of Nursing Management, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manda-Taylor L, Kufankomwe M, Chatha G, Chipeta E, Mamani-Mategula E, Mwangi MN, Kelaher M, Prang KH, Ataíde R, Pasricha SR, Phiri KS. Perceptions and experiences of intravenous iron treatment for anaemia in pregnancy in Malawi: a formative qualitative study. Gates Open Res 2024; 6:66. [PMID: 38455670 PMCID: PMC10917769 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13631.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The study objective was to explore opinions, identify experiences, and describe perspectives on the acceptability of intravenous (IV) iron to treat anaemia in pregnancy and identify potential barriers and facilitators of introducing IV iron in the Malawian healthcare system. Methods We conducted 15 in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions with pregnant women, and seven in-depth interviews with health workers at a community-based health centre in Blantyre and a tertiary hospital in Zomba. Results Most women who used IV iron treatment during the second trimester of pregnancy reported feeling better and stronger after receiving the intervention. Women perceived that IV iron treatment worked faster than oral iron tablets and increased their haemoglobin count. However, cultural beliefs that IV iron treatment will cause miscarriage and the perception that study procedures involved Satanism and vampirism practices were barriers to acceptability. Health workers found IV iron treatment easy to administer because it is a single-dose treatment, simultaneously reducing the burden for pregnant women taking daily oral iron tablets. However, health workers expressed concerns about the costs and the need to train health workers before the large-scale implementation and integration of IV iron treatment into Malawi's routine care. Conclusions Despite the perceived concerns and challenges experienced in participating in the first IV iron infusion trial in Malawi, participants' reflections suggest that IV iron infusion is acceptable for treating iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. Participant advocate groups can offer a peer-to-peer education approach to sensitize and engage community members on the benefits of treatment and dispel concerns when the country contemplates integrating IV iron infusion for treating anaemia in pregnancy in Malawi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Manda-Taylor
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| | - Macdonald Kufankomwe
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| | - Gertrude Chatha
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| | - Effie Chipeta
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| | - Elisabeth Mamani-Mategula
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| | - Martin N. Mwangi
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| | - Magaret Kelaher
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne,, Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Khic-Houy Prang
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne,, Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Ricardo Ataíde
- Population Health and Immunity/Infection and Immunity Divisions, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical, Research, 1G, Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Sant-Rayn Pasricha
- Population Health and Immunity/Infection and Immunity Divisions, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical, Research, 1G, Royal Parade, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Kamija Samuel Phiri
- School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciencies, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, 3, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Raimundo-Silva V, Marques CT, Fonseca JR, Martínez-Silveira MS, Reis MG. Factors related to willingness to participate in biomedical research on neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2024; 18:e0011996. [PMID: 38470936 PMCID: PMC10978008 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of participation in research could enhance recruitment rates for biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) and help to avoid the problems associated with poor recruitment. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We conducted a systematic review to identify factors related to willingness to participate in biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). Our search included the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase (Embase.com), Global Index Medicus (WHO), Web of Science (Core collection), and gray literature. We included studies that analyzed or reported factors associated with willingness to participate in NTD research, using either quantitative methods (such as clinical trials, cohorts, and cross-sectional studies) or qualitative methods (such as focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and in-depth interviews). There were no language restrictions, but we excluded review articles, notes, case reports, letters to the editor, editor's notes, extended abstracts, proceedings, patents, editorials, and other editorial materials. Screening of citations, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was conducted by independent reviewers, according to the study protocol registered on PROSPERO. For analyses, we assessed the frequency of barriers, enablers, and the frequency of recruitment interventions mentioned in the included studies. The protocol for this systematic review was registered under registration number CRD42020212536. (S1 Appendix) We identified 2070 citations, 1470 from the databases, and 600 from other sources. From those, eleven studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. The studies were conducted in Africa, Asia, and North America. Personal health benefits, monetary benefits, and community engagement and sensitization strategies were identified as the main reasons for participating in biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). However, distrust in researchers, lack of knowledge about research methods among potential participants, and previous negative experiences were identified as the main barriers to participating in biomedical research on NTDs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE This systematic review provides recommendations for improving adherence to biomedical research on Neglected Tropical Diseases, which can be applied in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caio Torres Marques
- Faculty of Medicine of Bahia, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - João Rezende Fonseca
- Faculty of Medicine of Bahia, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Mitermayer Galvão Reis
- Faculty of Medicine of Bahia, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
- Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswald Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, School of Public Health, Yale University—New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oladayo AM, Odukoya O, Sule V, Molobe I, Busch T, Akodu B, Adeyemo WL, Gowans LJJ, Eshete M, Alade A, Awotoye W, Adeyemo AA, Mossey PA, Prince AER, Murray JC, Butali A. Perceptions and beliefs of community gatekeepers about genomic risk information in African cleft research. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:507. [PMID: 38365612 PMCID: PMC10873930 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17987-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A fundamental ethical issue in African genomics research is how socio-cultural factors impact perspectives, acceptance, and utility of genomic information, especially in stigmatizing conditions like orofacial clefts (OFCs). Previous research has shown that gatekeepers (e.g., religious, political, family or community leaders) wield considerable influence on the decision-making capabilities of their members, including health issues. Thus, their perspectives can inform the design of engagement strategies and increase exposure to the benefits of genomics testing/research. This is especially important for Africans underrepresented in genomic research. Our study aims to investigate the perspectives of gatekeepers concerning genomic risk information (GRI) in the presence of OFCs in a sub-Saharan African cohort. METHODS Twenty-five focus group discussions (FGDs) consisting of 214 gatekeepers (religious, community, ethnic leaders, and traditional birth attendants) in Lagos, Nigeria, explored the opinions of participants on genomic risk information (GRI), OFC experience, and the possibility of involvement in collaborative decision-making in Lagos, Nigeria. Transcripts generated from audio recordings were coded and analyzed in NVivo using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three main themes-knowledge, beliefs, and willingness to act-emerged from exploring the perspective of gatekeepers about GRI in this group. We observed mixed opinions regarding the acceptance of GRI. Many participants believed their role is to guide and support members when they receive results; this is based on the level of trust their members have in them. However, participants felt they would need to be trained by medical experts to do this. Also, religious and cultural beliefs were crucial to determining participants' understanding of OFCs and the acceptance and utilization of GRI. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating cultural sensitivity into public engagement could help develop appropriate strategies to manage conflicting ideologies surrounding genomic information in African communities. This will allow for more widespread access to the advances in genomics research in underrepresented populations. We also recommend a synergistic relationship between community health specialists/scientists, and community leaders, including spiritual providers to better understand and utilize GRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimbola M Oladayo
- Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Iowa Institute of Oral Health Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Oluwakemi Odukoya
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Veronica Sule
- Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Ikenna Molobe
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Tamara Busch
- Iowa Institute of Oral Health Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Babatunde Akodu
- Department of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Wasiu L Adeyemo
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Lord J J Gowans
- Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital and Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Mekonen Eshete
- School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Azeez Alade
- Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Iowa Institute of Oral Health Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Waheed Awotoye
- Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Iowa Institute of Oral Health Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Peter A Mossey
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Jeffrey C Murray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Azeez Butali
- Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Iowa Institute of Oral Health Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koyuncu A, Elagöz İ, Yava A. Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on latex glove usage and latex allergy complaints among nurses: A descriptive study. Work 2024:WOR230235. [PMID: 38306080 DOI: 10.3233/wor-230235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant increase in the use of latex gloves among nurses. However, concerns about the rise in latex allergies and related complaints due to this increase remain uncertain.OBJECTİVE: This study aims to assess the rates of latex glove usage and allergy-related complaints among nurses working in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Between May 15 and June 15, 2021, ethical approvals were obtained for a cross-sectional study involving 448 volunteer nurses. Descriptive statistics were used to represent categorical values as counts (n) and percentages (%), while continuous values were represented as mean±standard deviation. The normal distribution of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Comparative analyses were conducted using paired sample t-test, Pearson's chi-squared (x2) test, McNemar's chi-squared (x2) test, and Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS Before the pandemic, the average number of invasive procedures was 45.13±26.48, whereas during the pandemic, this rate increased to 50.23±29.14. The average glove usage duration went from 7.69±3.13 hours to 14.73±3.68 hours during the pandemic. Among nurses, the rate of allergic symptoms, which was previously at 31.5%, rose to 33.3% during the pandemic.CONCLUSİON: This study revealed a significant increase in daily invasive procedures and the use of latex gloves among nurses during the pandemic period. Simultaneously, the frequency of allergic symptoms also rose. These findings underscore the importance of awareness and preventive measures, particularly regarding latex allergies, in the healthcare field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aynur Koyuncu
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - İslam Elagöz
- Department of Nursing, Yusuf Şerefoğlu Faculty of Health Sciences, Kilis 7Aralık University, Kilis, Turkey
| | - Ayla Yava
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tiruneh G, Yilma M, Wakuma B, Abdisa E, Bayisa L, Nichols M, Bedeker A, Tiffin N. Compliance with research ethics in epidemiological studies targeted to conflict-affected areas in Western Ethiopia: validity of informed consent (VIC) by information comprehension and voluntariness (ICV). BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:9. [PMID: 38238678 PMCID: PMC10795316 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01003-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The conduct of research is critical to advancing human health. However, there are issues of ethical concern specific to the design and conduct of research in conflict settings. Conflict-affected countries often lack strong platform to support technical guidance and monitoring of research ethics, which may lead to the use of divergent ethical standards some of which are poorly elaborated and loosely enforced. Despite the growing concern about ethical issues in research, there is a dearth of information about ethical compliance in conflict areas. Valid and ethically informed decision-making is a premier pact with research participants in settling possible ethical issues before commencing the research, which is ensured by gaining informed consent from prospective participants of the research. AIMS This research aimed to explore compliance with research ethics and consent validity in community-based epidemiological research conducted previously. METHODS Research participants were recruited in the western part of Ethiopia in three districts subjected to conflicts. A community-based cross-sectional study design was utilized, and 338 residents were enrolled as study participants. All participants had previously been enrolled as research participants in epidemiological studies. Data was collected using a questionnaire that was pilot-tested before the commencement of the main data collection. The questionnaire focused on participants' experiences of the informed consent process followed when they were recruited for an epidemiological study and covered themes such as essential information provided, level of comprehension, and voluntarism of consent. RESULTS Over half of the study participants, 176 (52%), were not provided with essential information before consenting. And 135 (40%) of them did not comprehend the information provided to them. One hundred and ninety (56%) participants freely and voluntarily agreed to partake in one of these epidemiological studies, with over a quarter (97; 28.7%) of them reporting they were subjected to undue influence. Written consent was obtained from only 32 (9.4%) of the participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemechu Tiruneh
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
| | - Mekdes Yilma
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
| | - Bizuneh Wakuma
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
| | - Eba Abdisa
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
| | - Lami Bayisa
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia
| | - Michelle Nichols
- South African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| | - Anja Bedeker
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Nicki Tiffin
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Greer RC, Kanthawang N, Roest J, Perrone C, Wangrangsimakul T, Parker M, Kelley M, Cheah PY. The challenges and potential solutions of achieving meaningful consent amongst research participants in northern Thailand: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:111. [PMID: 38115021 PMCID: PMC10729394 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00991-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achieving meaningful consent can be challenging, particularly in contexts of diminished literacy, yet is a vital part of participant protection in global health research. METHOD We explored the challenges and potential solutions of achieving meaningful consent through a qualitative study in a predominantly hill tribe ethnic minority population in northern Thailand, a culturally distinctive population with low literacy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 37 respondents who had participated in scrub typhus clinical research, their family members, researchers and other key informants. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Our analysis identified four interrelated themes surrounding participants' ability to give consent: varying degrees of research understanding, limitations of using informal translators, issues impacting decisions to join research, and voluntariness of consent. Suggestions for achieving more meaningful consent included the use of formal translators and community engagement with research populations. CONCLUSIONS Participant's agency in decision making to join research should be supported, but research information needs to be communicated to potential participants in a way that they can understand. We found that improved understanding about the study and its potential benefits and harms goes beyond literacy or translation and requires attention to social and cultural factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Greer
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Nipaphan Kanthawang
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jennifer Roest
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carlo Perrone
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tri Wangrangsimakul
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Kelley
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schultz B, Agamah FE, Ewuoso C, Madden EB, Troyer J, Skelton M, Mwaka E. Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 50:57-61. [PMID: 36941048 PMCID: PMC10804035 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
In July 2020, the H3Africa Ethics and Community Engagement (E&CE) Working Group organised a webinar with ethics committee members and biomedical researchers from various African institutions throughout the Continent to discuss the issue of whether and how biological samples for scientific research may be accessed by commercial entities when broad consents obtained for the samples are silent. 128 people including Research Ethics Committee members (10), H3Africa researchers (46) including members of the E&CE working group, biomedical researchers not associated with H3Africa (27), representatives from the National Institutes of Health (16) and 10 other participants attended the webinar and shared their views. Several major themes emerged during the webinar, with the topics of broad versus explicit informed consent, defining commercial use, legacy samples and benefit sharing prevailing in the discussion. This report describes the consensus concerns and recommendations raised during the meeting and will be informative for future research on ethical considerations for genomic research in the African research context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baergen Schultz
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Francis E Agamah
- Computational Biology Division, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Cornelius Ewuoso
- Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Ebony B Madden
- Training, Diversity and Health Equity Office, Office of the Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Troyer
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Michelle Skelton
- Computational Biology Division, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Erisa Mwaka
- College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Modlin C, Sugarman J, Chongwe G, Kass N, Nazziwa W, Tegli J, Shrestha P, Ali J. Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 8:120. [PMID: 38089903 PMCID: PMC10714106 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18915.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Use of adaptive clinical trials, particularly adaptive platform trials, has grown exponentially in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Implementation of these trials in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been fostered through the formation or modification of transnational research partnerships, typically between research groups from LMICs and high-income countries (HICs). While these partnerships are important to promote collaboration and overcome the structural and economic disadvantages faced by LMIC health researchers, it is critical to focus attention on the multiple dimensions of partnership equity. Methods Based on informal literature reviews and a meeting with leaders of one of the multinational COVID-19 adaptive platform trials, we describe some important considerations about research partnership equity in this context. Results We organize these considerations into eight thematic categories: 1) epistemic structures, 2) funding, 3) ethics oversight, 4) regulatory oversight, 5) leadership, 6) post-trial access to interventions, data, and specimens, 7) knowledge translation and dissemination, and 8) research capacity strengthening and maintenance. Within each category we review normative claims that support its relevance to research partnership equity followed by discussion of how adaptive platform trials highlight new dimensions, considerations, or challenges. Conclusion In aggregate, these observations provide insight into procedural and substantive equity-building measures within transnational global health research partnerships more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Modlin
- Berman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
| | - Gershom Chongwe
- School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Nancy Kass
- Berman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
| | - Winfred Nazziwa
- Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jemee Tegli
- Family Health International Clinical/Partnership for Research on Vaccines and Infectious Diseases in Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia
| | - Prakriti Shrestha
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
| | - Joseph Ali
- Berman Institute for Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chapman CR, Quinn GP, Natri HM, Berrios C, Dwyer P, Owens K, Heraty S, Caplan AL. Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023:1-14. [PMID: 38010648 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2276161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Harms and risks to groups and third-parties can be significant in the context of research, particularly in data-centric studies involving genomic, artificial intelligence, and/or machine learning technologies. This article explores whether and how United States federal regulations should be adapted to better align with current ethical thinking and protect group interests. Three aspects of the Common Rule deserve attention and reconsideration with respect to group interests: institutional review board (IRB) assessment of the risks/benefits of research; disclosure requirements in the informed consent process; and criteria for waivers of informed consent. In accordance with respect for persons and communities, investigators and IRBs should systematically consider potential group harm when designing and reviewing protocols, respectively. Research participants should be informed about any potential group harm in the consent process. We call for additional public discussion, empirical research, and normative analysis on these issues to determine the right regulatory and policy path forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Courtney Berrios
- Children's Mercy Kansas City
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ishimwe MCS, Kiplagat J, Kadam Knowlton A, Livinski AA, Kupfer LE. Reversing the trend: a scoping review of health innovation transfer or exchange from low- and middle-income countries to high-income countries. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e013583. [PMID: 37967892 PMCID: PMC10660955 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The transfer of innovations from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to high-income countries (HICs) has received little attention, leaving gaps in the understanding of the process, its benefits and the factors influencing it. This scoping review, part of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) project and the focus for a 2022 NIH-sponsored workshop on Global Health Reciprocal Innovation, sought to identify publications describing health innovations that were researched, developed and implemented in LMICs and adapted to address similar health challenges in HICs. A protocol was written a priori and registered on Open Science Framework. Four databases were searched for articles published in English from 2000 to 2022 and described health innovations developed in LMICs and were transferred to HICs. Using Covidence, two reviewers initially screened the title and abstract and then the full text; discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Two reviewers collected the data from each article using Covidence and Microsoft Excel; discrepancies were resolved by a separate third reviewer. 7191 records were retrieved and screened of which 12 studies were included. Various frameworks and methodologies were employed in these studies, with a particular emphasis on adaptation and adoption of innovations. The review uncovered different paradigms of LMIC to HIC innovation transfer and exchange, including unidirectional transfers from LMICs to HICs as well as bidirectional or multidirectional mutually beneficial exchanges. The use of both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods was common across all the included articles. Facilitators for innovation transfers included stakeholder engagement, relevance of local context, simplicity, and sufficient funding, promotion and branding. Barriers to transfers were mostly the opposite of the facilitators. Our results highlighted the underexplored field of LMIC to HIC innovation transfer and exchange and lay the foundation for future research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jepchirchir Kiplagat
- College of Health Sciences, Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Arina Kadam Knowlton
- Center for Global Health Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alicia A Livinski
- Division of Library Services, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Linda E Kupfer
- Center for Global Health Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Matandika L, Millar K, Umar E, Mfutso-Bengo J. Perspectives of agriculture, nutrition and health researchers regarding research governance in Malawi. Using a leadership, ethics, governance and systems framework. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:66. [PMID: 37605143 PMCID: PMC10441702 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00940-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research ethics is intertwined with and depends on building robust and responsive research governance systems alongside researchers. Globally there has been substantial investment in agriculture, nutrition, and health (ANH) research motivated by the need to improve health outcomes, such as micronutrient deficiencies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Although there has been a notable focus on ethical issues inherent in ANH studies, there has been scanty research examining researchers' attitudes related to ANH research. This study was conducted to explore the perspectives of researchers who conducted an agronomic biofortification study in Malawi. METHODOLOGY In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of ten ANH researchers. Interviews were conducted online via Zoom, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using the Leadership, Ethics, Governance and Systems Framework. RESULTS Four core aspects emerged: Leadership: The relevance of building ethics leadership and ethical competence among researchers. ETHICS There is a need to develop a framework that operationalises core ethical values that can guide the implementation of ANH research. Governance: Research guidelines were perceived to be too generic to guide ANH research. Systems: Researchers' recommended the establishment of a specialised ANH research ethics committee. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the significance of building ethics leadership and supporting ethical competency amongst researchers. Researchers recommended the development of tailored approaches rather than utilising generic governance systems and frameworks that are drawn from medical research and thus not fit for purpose in this field. In Malawi, specialised ethics review committees are needed to guide ANH research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limbanazo Matandika
- Center for Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa (CEBESA), Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (formerly known as the University of Malawi, College of Medicine), Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Kate Millar
- Centre for Applied Bioethics, Schools of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Eric Umar
- Health Systems and Policy Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (formerly known as the University of Malawi, College of Medicine), Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
- Center for Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa (CEBESA), Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (formerly known as the University of Malawi, College of Medicine), Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi
- Health Systems and Policy Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (formerly known as the University of Malawi, College of Medicine), Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chepkirui D, Kipkemoi P, Bitta M, Harris E, Musesengwa R, Kamuya D. Ethical issues of involving people with intellectual disabilities in genomic research: a scoping review protocol. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 8:340. [PMID: 37928211 PMCID: PMC10624948 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19403.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric genomic research is a growing field of research in Africa that is looking at epigenetics of psychiatric disorders; within which a specific focus is neurodevelopmental disorders including intellectual disability (ID). Conducting this type of research is important to identify etiologies and possible interventions or areas for further research. However, genomic research generally, and psychiatric genomic research, faces many social, ethical, cultural, and legal issues; research involving people with ID is particularly challenging. All research stakeholders - researchers, research review bodies, regulators, patient groups - generally agree that involving people with ID require several considerations, including extra protection. It is also recognized that not involving people with ID in research that is relevant to them means that opportunities to learn on specific issues including lived experiences are missed. In this scoping review, we aim to describe the range of ethical and social-cultural issues concerning involvement of people with intellectual disability in genomic research from existing literature. Methods: This scoping review will be conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping review and reported using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Iterative review stages will include systematic search of six databases (Embase, Ovid Global Health, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo and Web of Science core collection), screening, charting and synthesis of the data. Forward and backward citation screening will also be done for the articles included in the final review. We will include peer reviewed journal articles, guidance documents and reports. Screening and selection of studies based on the eligibility criteria will be done independently by three reviewers; conflicts will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer and other experts. Results: The results will be included in the scoping review publication. Conclusions: This scoping review will identify key areas of ethical tensions and possible solutions and inform opportunities for empirical ethics studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothy Chepkirui
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Patricia Kipkemoi
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Mary Bitta
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Eli Harris
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | | | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vasquez EE, Foti N, McMahon CE, Jeske M, Bentz M, Fullerton S, Shim JK, Lee SSJ. Rethinking Benefit and Responsibility in the Context of Diversity: Perspectives from the Front Lines of Precision Medicine Research. Public Health Genomics 2023; 26:103-112. [PMID: 37442104 PMCID: PMC10614449 DOI: 10.1159/000531656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Federal agencies have instituted guidelines to prioritize the enrollment and retention of diverse participants in precision medicine research (PMR). Prior studies examining participation of minoritized communities have shown that potential benefits represent a key determinant. Human subject research guidance, however, conceptualizes potential benefits narrowly, emphasizing generalized advances in medical knowledge. Further, few studies have provided qualitative data that critically examine how the concept of "benefit" is interpreted or challenged in the context of research practice. This paper examines the experiences of PMR investigators and frontline research staff to understand how standard approaches to benefit are received, contested, and negotiated "on the ground." METHODS Findings are drawn from a qualitative project conducted across five US-based, federally funded PMR studies. Data collection included 125 in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of investigators, research staff, community advisory board members, and NIH program officers associated with these PMR studies. RESULTS Researchers report that the standard approach to benefit - which relies on the premise of altruism and the promise of incrementally advancing scientific knowledge - is frequently contested. Researchers experience moral distress over the unmet clinical, psychosocial, and material needs within the communities they are engaging. Many believe the broader research enterprise has a responsibility to better address these needs. CONCLUSION Researchers frequently take issue with and sometimes negotiate what is owed to participants and to their communities in exchange for the data they provide. These experiences of moral distress and these improvisations warrant systematic redress, not by individual researchers but by the broader research ethics infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Vasquez
- Department of Sociology, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicole Foti
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Caitlin E McMahon
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melanie Jeske
- Institute on the Formation of Knowledge, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Bentz
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephanie Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Janet K Shim
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kudaibergenova T, Ibrahim M, Jain N, Vetra J. Documentary Assessment of the Abilities of Kyrgyzstan's Research Ethics Committees During Public Health Emergency and Non-Emergency Situations. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023; 18:99-108. [PMID: 37203158 PMCID: PMC10251458 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231176711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Institutional Research Ethics Committees (RECs) play crucial roles in the impartial and competent review of scientific research, particularly during public health emergencies. In this report, we examined their ability and capacity to provide this basic service during public health emergencies and non-emergency situations. Our qualitative documentary analysis revealed that there are currently no legal regulations guiding the activities of Kyrgyz RECs during public health emergencies. In addition, major policy gaps exist in how RECs should operate in non-emergency circumstances. This lack of guidance highlights the urgent need to develop and implement ethical guidelines to meet the evolving needs of such emergencies. Our findings underscore the growing urgency of supporting capacity building of RECs to respond effectively to future pandemics and other public health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Kudaibergenova
- Department of Public Health and Healthcare, I.K. Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Muiz Ibrahim
- Faculty of Medicine, International Higher School of Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Nityanand Jain
- Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradinš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Janis Vetra
- Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradinš University, Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zulu VC, Syakalima M, Ali J. Ethical dimensions of zoonotic disease research: Perspectives of traditional livestock keepers in Zambia. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 7:201. [PMID: 37496727 PMCID: PMC10366554 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17962.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: With the increase in zoonotic disease research using livestock belonging to traditional livestock keepers (LKs) as research subjects, careful attention to both animal and livestock keeper interests is critically important in Zambia and other similar contexts. Methods: The study aimed to explore ethics-related challenges during zoonotic disease research among LKs where their livestock are included as research subjects. The study was implemented in the Southern province of Zambia in July 2020. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 30 adult male LKs living in livestock-wildlife interface areas where zoonotic diseases are likely to occur, were carried out. The FGDs were done in the local language and audio recorded. Thematic analysis was done using field notes and translated and transcribed recorded interviews. Results: The study found that trust between the researchers and LKs when their livestock are used as research subjects was very cardinal and depended on the continual presence of the local veterinary assistant (VA) during the conduct of research. Conclusions: The LKs could be considered a vulnerable population when their livestock were used as research subjects as, being resource poor, they were looking to researchers to provide benefits yet not fully understanding the research, and thus did not worry so much about consent procedures, bringing into question the validity of the oral consent obtained. The study also found that opportunities to strengthen trust and enhance the research experience could be exploited by researchers conducting research that is locally relevant and desired, being aware of procedural preferences for entering into livestock keeping communities, adequate disclosure of research procedures, respecting conventions and traditional cultural beliefs, and returning results of research. The findings of this study can be used by both researchers as they carry-out zoonotic disease research and by Research Ethics Committees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Chisha Zulu
- Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine; University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Michelo Syakalima
- Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O Box 32379, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia
| | - Joseph Ali
- International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Davies A, Ormel I, Bernier A, Harriss E, Mumba N, Gobat N, Schwartz L, Cheah PY. A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 8:194. [PMID: 37654739 PMCID: PMC10465998 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19318.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background : Public Health Emergencies (PHE) demand expeditious research responses to evaluate new or repurposed therapies and prevention strategies. Alternative Design Trials (ADTs) and Adaptive Platform Trials (APTs) have enabled efficient large-scale testing of biomedical interventions during recent PHEs. Design features of these trials may have implications for engagement and/or informed consent processes. We aimed to rapidly review evidence on engagement and informed consent for ADTs and APTs during PHE to consider what (if any) recommendations can inform practice. Method : In 2022, we searched 8 prominent databases for relevant peer reviewed publications and guidelines for ADTs/APTs in PHE contexts. Articles were selected based on pre-identified inclusion and exclusion criteria. We reviewed protocols and informed consent documents for a sample of large platform trials and consulted with key informants from ADTs/APT trial teams. Data were extracted and summarised using narrative synthesis. Results : Of the 49 articles included, 10 were guidance documents, 14 discussed engagement, 10 discussed informed consent, and 15 discussed both. Included articles addressed ADTs delivered during the West African Ebola epidemic and APTs delivered during COVID-19. PHE clinical research guidance documents highlight the value of ADTs/APTs and the importance of community engagement, but do not provide practice-specific guidance for engagement or informed consent. Engagement and consent practice for ADTs conducted during the West African Ebola epidemic have been well-documented. For COVID-19, engagement and consent practice was described for APTs primarily delivered in high income countries with well-developed health service structures. A key consideration is strong communication of the complexity of trial design in clear, accessible ways. Conclusion: We highlight key considerations for best practice in community engagement and informed consent relevant to ADTs and APTs for PHEs which may helpfully be included in future guidance. Protocol: The review protocol is published online at Prospero on 15/06/2022: registration number CRD42022334170.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alun Davies
- Health Systems Collaborative, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Ilja Ormel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexe Bernier
- Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Social Work, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eli Harriss
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Noni Mumba
- The KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - Nina Gobat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Lisa Schwartz
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Modlin CE, Kankaka EN, Chang LW, Sewankambo NK, Ali J. Exploring HIV/AIDS investigator perceptions of equity within research partnerships between low-and middle-income and high-income countries: a pilot survey. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:32. [PMID: 37127604 PMCID: PMC10152781 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00977-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommendations for research partnerships between low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs) stress the importance of equity within the collaboration. However, there is limited knowledge of the practical challenges and successes involved in establishing equitable research practices. This study describes the results of a pilot survey assessing key issues on LMIC/HIC partnership equity within HIV/AIDS research collaborations and compares perspectives of these issues between LMIC- and HIC-based investigators. METHODS Survey participants were selected using clustered, random sampling and snowball sampling. Responses were compared between LMIC and HIC respondents using standard descriptive statistics. Qualitative respondent feedback was analyzed using a combination of exploratory and confirmatory thematic analysis. RESULTS The majority of categories within four themes (research interests and resources; leadership, trust, and communication; cultural and ethical competence; representation and benefits) demonstrated relative consensus between LMIC and HIC respondents except for 'lack of trust within the partnership' which was rated as a more pronounced challenge by LMIC respondents. However, subcategories within some of the themes had significant differences between respondent groups including: equitable setting of the research agenda, compromise within a partnership, the role of regulatory bodies in monitoring partnerships for equity, and post-study access to research technology. CONCLUSIONS These efforts serve as a proof-of-concept survey characterizing contemporary issues around international research partnership equity. The frequency and severity of specific equity issues can be assessed, highlighting similarities versus differences in experiences between LMIC and HIC partners as potential targets for further discussion and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea E Modlin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Edward Nelson Kankaka
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Rakai Health Sciences Program, Rakai, Uganda
| | - Larry W Chang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nelson K Sewankambo
- Rakai Health Sciences Program, Rakai, Uganda
- Department of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joseph Ali
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pratt B, de Vries J. Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:325-334. [PMID: 36657964 PMCID: PMC10176400 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The silencing of the epistemologies, theories, principles, values, concepts and experiences of the global South constitutes a particularly egregious epistemic injustice in bioethics. Our shared responsibility to rectify that injustice should be at the top of the ethics agenda. That it is not, or only is in part, is deeply problematic and endangers the credibility of the entire field. As a first step towards reorienting the field, this paper offers a comprehensive account of epistemic justice for global health ethics. We first introduce several different conceptions of justice and decolonisation in relation to knowledge, purposefully drawing on work emanating from the global South as well as the global North. We then apply those conceptions to the global health ethics context to generate a tripartite account of the layers of epistemic justice in the field: who is producing ethics knowledge; what theories and concepts are being applied to produce ethics knowledge; and whose voices are sought, recorded and used to generate ethics knowledge. These layers reflect that the field spans conceptual and empirical research. We conclude by proposing that, going forward, three avenues are key to achieve greater epistemic justice at each layer and to help decolonise global health ethics: namely, understanding the problem, dialogue and structural change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Pratt
- Queensland Bioethics Centre, Australian Catholic University - Brisbane Campus, Banyo, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jantina de Vries
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- The Ethics Lab, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tackett S, Jenn Ng C, Sugarman J, Daniel EGS, Gopalan N, Tivyashinee, Kamarulzaman A, Ali J. A Competency Framework for Health Research Ethics Educational Programs: Results from a Stakeholder-Driven Mixed-Method Process. Ethics Hum Res 2023; 45:29-39. [PMID: 37167475 PMCID: PMC10228593 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Educational programs are integral to building health research ethics (HRE) capacity, but no outcomes framework exists to guide them. We empirically developed a competency framework for health research ethics education-the Framework for Research Ethics Studies Competencies and Outcomes (FRESCO)-using mixed methods, including group concept mapping and a survey of international experts. FRESCO includes seven competency domains: (1) Foundational Knowledge; (2) Laws, Regulations, Guidelines, and Policies for Research Oversight; (3) Ethical-Issue Identification, Analysis, and Resolution; (4) Engagement, Communication, and Advocacy; (5) Lifelong Learning, Education, Research, and Scholarship; (6) Coordination, Stewardship, and Responsiveness in HRE Systems; and (7) Impartiality, Honesty, and Responsibility. These domains are detailed in 27 subdomains. Survey respondents rated FRESCO's relevance to HRE highly. FRESCO can be adapted and implemented in educational programs to refine recruitment and selection processes, educational and assessment methods, and performance measures to ensure that HRE educational programs have their intended effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Tackett
- Associate professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the international medical education director in the Division of General Internal Medicine at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Clinical professor of family medicine at Duke-NUS Medical School and an Honorary Professor at the Faculty of Medicine at the Universiti Malaya
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Harvey M. Meyerhoff Professor of Bioethics and Medicine at the Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Department of Medicine at the Johns Hopkins University
| | | | - Nishakanthi Gopalan
- Senior lecturer at the Medical Humanities and Ethics Unit at the Faculty of Medicine at Universiti Malaya and the program coordinator for the Master of Health Research Ethics program
| | - Tivyashinee
- Medical graduate from Perdana University-Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and a manager for the Master of Health Research Ethics program
| | - Adeeba Kamarulzaman
- Professor of medicine and infectious diseases at the University Malaya Medical Centre and the director of the Centre of Excellence in Research on AIDS at the University of Malaya
| | - Joseph Ali
- Associate professor of international health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and a member of the core faculty and the associate director for Global Programs at Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Raskoff SZ, Thurm A, Miguel HO, Kim SYH, Quezado ZMN. Pain research and children and adolescents with severe intellectual disability: ethical challenges and imperatives. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2023; 7:288-296. [PMID: 36563701 PMCID: PMC10038826 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00346-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Children with severe intellectual disabilities encounter inequities in pain-related care, yet little pain research involves this population. A considerable issue with pain research in this population is its ethical complexity. This Viewpoint delineates the ethical challenges of pain research involving children (aged 2-12 years) and adolescents (aged 13-21 years) with severe intellectual disabilities. There are two main issues. First, some of the standard methods for assessing pain and pain sensitivity are not suitable for individuals with severe intellectual disability, who are often non-verbal and unable to understand or follow instructions. Second, children and adolescents with severe intellectual disability cannot provide informed consent or assent to participate in pain research, and their dissent is not always recognised. The existing ethical guidelines for pain research by the International Association for the Study of Pain provide helpful, but general, guidance. This Viewpoint supplements these guidelines and uses a well established framework for assessing the ethics of clinical research to highlight points relevant to designing, doing, reviewing, and evaluating research involving children and adolescents with severe intellectual disability, focusing on issues that are unaddressed in existing guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Z Raskoff
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Audrey Thurm
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Helga O Miguel
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, The Clinical Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Scott Y H Kim
- Department of Bioethics, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Zenaide M N Quezado
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, The Clinical Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mbaya OT, Kingebeni PM, Dodd LE, Tamfum JJM, Lane C. On the importance and challenges of global access to proven life-saving treatments for Ebolavirus. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2023; 23:406-407. [PMID: 36963916 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00141-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Tshiani Mbaya
- Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo; Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
| | | | - Lori E Dodd
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Clifford Lane
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Modlin C, Sugarman J, Chongwe G, Kass N, Nazziwa W, Tegli J, Shrestha P, Ali J. Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries. Wellcome Open Res 2023. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18915.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Use of adaptive clinical trials, particularly adaptive platform trials, has grown exponentially in response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Implementation of these trials in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been fostered through the formation or modification of transnational research partnerships, typically between research groups from LMICs and high-income countries (HICs). While these partnerships are important to promote collaboration and overcome the structural and economic disadvantages faced by LMIC health researchers, it is critical to focus attention on the multiple dimensions of partnership equity. Methods: Based on informal literature reviews and meetings with leaders of one of the multinational COVID-19 adaptive platform trials, we describe what can be learned about research partnership equity from these experiences. Results: We organize these considerations into eight thematic categories: 1) epistemic structures, 2) funding, 3) ethics oversight, 4) regulatory oversight, 5) leadership, 6) post-trial access to interventions, data, and specimens, 7) knowledge translation, and 8) research capacity strengthening and maintenance. Within each category we review the normative claims that support its relevance to research partnership equity followed by discussion of how adaptive platform trials highlight new dimensions, considerations, or challenges. Conclusion: These observations provide insight into procedural and substantive equity-building measures within transnational global health research partnerships more broadly.
Collapse
|
28
|
Valencia-Contrera M, Valenzuela-Suazo S. Propuesta para protocolizar el abordaje de daños emocionales en investigación con seres humanos. PERSONA Y BIOÉTICA 2023. [DOI: 10.5294/pebi.2022.26.2.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Artículo teórico-reflexivo que responde al objetivo de generar lineamientos para el abordaje de daños en el ámbito emocional en investigaciones con seres humanos. Utilizando directrices de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, de la Asociación Profesional de Enfermeras de Ontario y, como referente, a la teorista Joyce Travelbee, se genera un diagrama de flujo como propuesta para protocolizar el abordaje de daños emocionales en investigación con seres humanos, con base en la formalidad, la rigurosidad y la empatía que requiere el proceso de ayuda ante potenciales daños generados en una investigación. Esto debido a que resulta perentorio presentar guías predefinidas en cualquier investigación que, tras un minucioso análisis, presente el riesgo de compromiso emocional en los participantes.
Collapse
|
29
|
Burgess T, Rennie S, Moodley K. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:11. [PMID: 36793067 PMCID: PMC9930063 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00888-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic presents significant challenges to research ethics committees (RECs) in balancing urgency of review of COVID-19 research with careful consideration of risks and benefits. In the African context, RECs are further challenged by historical mistrust of research and potential impacts on COVID-19 related research participation, as well as the need to facilitate equitable access to effective treatments or vaccines for COVID-19. In South Africa, an absent National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) also left RECs without national guidance for a significant duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study that explored the perspectives and experiences of RECs regarding the ethical challenges of COVID-19 research in South Africa. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with 21 REC chairpersons or members from seven RECs at large academic health institutions across South Africa that were actively involved in the review of COVID-19 related research from January to April 2021. In-depth interviews were conducted remotely via Zoom. Interviews (60-125 min) were conducted in English using an in-depth interview guide, until data saturation was achieved. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and field notes were converted into data documents. Line-by-line coding of transcripts was performed, and data were organised into themes and sub-themes. An inductive approach to thematic analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS Five main themes were identified, namely: rapidly evolving research ethics landscape, extreme vulnerability of research participants, unique challenges to informed consent, challenges to community engagement during COVID-19, and overlapping research ethics and public health equity issues. Sub-themes were identified for each main theme. CONCLUSIONS Numerous, significant ethical complexities and challenges were identified by South African REC members in the review of COVID-19 related research. While RECs are resilient and adaptable, reviewer and REC member fatigue were major concerns. The numerous ethical issues identified also highlight the need for research ethics teaching and training, especially in informed consent, as well as the urgent requirement for the development of national guidelines for research ethics during public health emergencies. Further, comparative analysis between different countries is needed to develop the discourse around African RECs and COVID-19 research ethics issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Burgess
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, WHO Collaborating Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, F45 Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7725 South Africa
| | - Stuart Rennie
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, WHO Collaborating Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Social Medicine, UNC Bioethics Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Keymanthri Moodley
- Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, WHO Collaborating Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Social Medicine, UNC Bioethics Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Medeiros M, Edwards HA, Baquet CR. Research in the USA on COVID-19's long-term effects: measures needed to ensure black, indigenous and Latinx communities are not left behind. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:87-91. [PMID: 35365568 PMCID: PMC8983399 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to expose underlying inequities in healthcare for black, indigenous and Latinx communities in the USA. The gaps in equitable care for communities of colour transcend the diagnosis, treatment and vaccinations related to COVID-19. We are experiencing a continued gap across racial and socioeconomic lines for those who suffer prolonged effects of COVID-19, also known as 'Long COVID-19'. What we know about the treatment for Long COVID-19 so far is that it is complex, requires a multidisciplinary approach and there is still much research needed to fully understand the effects. In this paper, we discuss pragmatic considerations for including affected communities, relevant stakeholders, and leaders from communities of colour in the planning and implementation of Long COVID-19 research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Medeiros
- Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hillary Anne Edwards
- Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Claudia Rose Baquet
- Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- HOPE Institute, LLC, Columbia, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eeckhout D, Aelbrecht K, Van Der Straeten C. Informed Consent: Research Staff's Perspectives and Practical Recommendations to Improve Research Staff-Participant Communication. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023; 18:3-12. [PMID: 36562147 DOI: 10.1177/15562646221146043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Informed consent (IC) is the process of communication between research staff and potential research participants. However, ensuring that participants clearly understand what research participation entails, raises significant challenges. The aim of this study is to provide insight into some communication barriers that research staff are confronted with and make practical recommendations to improve communication between research staff and participants. A qualitative research study using semi-structured interviews (n = 13) with research staff from Ghent University Hospital was conducted. Data were transcribed verbatim and coded thematically. Our results indicate that communication- and process-related factors affect the IC process. Emergent recommendations include communication training, more interactive information materials and the use of digital alternatives, increasing general knowledge about research participation and patient- and public involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Eeckhout
- Department Health Innovation and Research Institute (HIRUZ), 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karolien Aelbrecht
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, 54498Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Catherine Van Der Straeten
- Department Health Innovation and Research Institute (HIRUZ), 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jarvis MA, Pillay SR, Norton LM, Hiraman N, Baloyi OB. Delivering a psychosocial program for older people living in retirement homes during the Covid-19 pandemic: A process evaluation and recommendations for community interventions. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2023; 51:31-50. [PMID: 35562188 PMCID: PMC9348144 DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic lockdown regulations caused retirement homes to temporarily ban in-person visitation potentially increasing the mental health risks of older people. An opportunity arose for a multistakeholder community collaboration to design a mental health program for older people. To evaluate the process of delivering a 12-week psychosocial program aimed at preventing loneliness, countering boredom, and providing older people in restricted settings with education about Covid-19 during the lockdown, in Durban, South Africa. A qualitative retrospective design was used. Data from two focus groups and six semistructured individual interviews conducted with stakeholders (volunteers, social workers, and residents) postproject were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Stakeholders had varied experiences of the project, in terms of content, processes of engagement, and implementation, resulting in five themes. The study concluded with recommendations. A strong need exists for multistakeholder community collaborations when implementing a program where the context restricts physical access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Ann Jarvis
- School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu‐NatalDurbanSouth Africa
| | - Suntosh R. Pillay
- King Dinuzulu Hospital ComplexDurbanSouth Africa
- Department of Clinical Medicine (Psychiatry), Nelson R. Mandela School of MedicineUniversity of KwaZulu‐Natal (UKZN)DurbanSouth Africa
| | - Lynn M. Norton
- South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG)KwaZulu‐NatalSouth Africa
| | - Nemisha Hiraman
- Lead Behavioural TherapistThe Star AcademyDurbanSouth Africa
| | - Olivia B. Baloyi
- School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu‐NatalDurbanSouth Africa
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Richardson HS. Can the Research Team-Participant Relationship Ground Ancillary-Care Obligations? Ethics Hum Res 2023; 45:2-14. [PMID: 36691690 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Discussion of medical researcher teams' ancillary-care obligations has long been dominated by partial-entrustment theory, developed in 2004 by the author of this article, in collaboration with Leah Belsky. Critics of the limited scope of the special ancillary-care obligations defended by that theory, however, argue that a better theory would take fuller account of the relationship that develops between individual research participants and members of the research team. Nate W. Olson and Thaddeus Metz have each put forward well worked-out versions of such a relationship-based account of ancillary-care obligations. This article critically evaluates these accounts, concluding that while each of them is vulnerable to various criticisms, each also crucially facilitates understanding of this relationship: Olson brings out well how research participants can find that role not just beneficial but also deeply meaningful, and Metz, drawing on African ethical traditions, emphasizes that when things go well, participants are involved as partners in the research effort. Yet the article closes by arguing that the partial-entrustment theory, surprisingly, can take on board each of these lessons. As so enhanced, it may actually be the best available relationship-based theory of this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry S Richardson
- Professor of philosophy at Georgetown University and a senior research scholar at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Khati A, Wickersham JA, Rosen AO, Luces JRB, Copenhaver N, Jeri-Wahrhaftig A, Ab Halim MA, Azwa I, Gautam K, Ooi KH, Shrestha R. Ethical Issues in the Use of Smartphone Apps for HIV Prevention in Malaysia: Focus Group Study With Men Who Have Sex With Men. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e42939. [PMID: 36563046 PMCID: PMC9823573 DOI: 10.2196/42939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of smartphone apps can improve the HIV prevention cascade for key populations such as men who have sex with men (MSM). In Malaysia, where stigma and discrimination toward MSM are high, mobile health app-based strategies have the potential to open new frontiers for HIV prevention. However, little guidance is available to inform researchers about the ethical concerns that are unique to the development and implementation of app-based HIV prevention programs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to fill this gap by characterizing the attitudes and concerns of Malaysian MSM regarding HIV prevention mobile apps, particularly regarding the ethical aspects surrounding their use. METHODS We conducted web-based focus group discussions with 23 MSM between August and September 2021. Using in-depth semistructured interviews, participants were asked about the risks and ethical issues they perceived to be associated with using mobile apps for HIV prevention. Each session was digitally recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were inductively coded using the Dedoose software (SocioCultural Research Consultants) and analyzed to identify and interpret emerging themes. RESULTS Although participants were highly willing to use app-based strategies for HIV prevention, they raised several ethical concerns related to their use. Prominent concerns raised by participants included privacy and confidentiality concerns, including fear of third-party access to personal health information (eg, friends or family and government agencies), issues around personal health data storage and management, equity and equitable access, informed consent, and regulation. CONCLUSIONS The study's findings highlight the role of ethical concerns related to the use of app-based HIV prevention programs. Given the ever-growing nature of such technological platforms that are intermixed with a complex ethical-legal landscape, mobile health platforms must be safe and secure to minimize unintended harm, safeguard user privacy and confidentiality, and obtain public trust and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Khati
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | | | - Aviana O Rosen
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | | | - Nicholas Copenhaver
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Alma Jeri-Wahrhaftig
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Mohd Akbar Ab Halim
- Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Iskandar Azwa
- Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kamal Gautam
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Kai Hong Ooi
- Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS (CERiA), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Roman Shrestha
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
- AIDS Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Singh S, Engel-Hills P. Invited Peer Commentary: Research Site Anonymity in Context. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2022; 17:565-572. [PMID: 36394587 DOI: 10.1177/19401612221138478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shenuka Singh
- Discipline of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Penelope Engel-Hills
- Faculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Western Cape, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mwaka ES, Bagenda G, Sebatta DE, Nabukenya S, Munabi I. Benefit sharing in genomic and biobanking research in Uganda: Perceptions of researchers and research ethics committee members. Front Genet 2022; 13:1037401. [DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1037401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Genomic and biobanking research has increased in Africa over the past few years. This has raised pertinent ethical, legal, and societal concerns for stakeholders such as sample or data ownership, commercialization, and benefit sharing. There is limited awareness of the concept of benefit sharing by stakeholders in sub-Saharan Africa.Objective: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of researchers and research ethics committee members on benefit sharing in international collaborative genomic and biobanking research.Methods: Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 researchers and 19 research ethics committee members. A thematic approach was used to interpret the results.Results: Six themes emerged from the data and these included perceptions on the benefits of genomic and biobanking research; discussion of benefit sharing with participants during the informed consent process; legal implications of benefit sharing and the role of material transfer agreements; equity and fairness in sharing the benefits of genomic research; perceived barriers to fair benefit sharing; and recommendations for fostering fair and equitable benefit sharing in genomic and biobanking research. Most respondents clearly understood the various forms of benefits of genomic and biobanking research and opined that such benefits should be fairly and equitably shared with low and middle-income country researchers and their institutions, and research communities. The perceived barriers to the fair benefit sharing unfavorable include power disparities, weak research regulatory frameworks, and lack of scientific integrity.Conclusion: Overall, respondents believed that the distribution of the advantages of genomic and biobanking research in North-South collaborative research was not equitable nor fair, and that the playing field was not leveled. Therefore, we advocate the following for fair and equitable benefit sharing: Building the capacities and empowering research scientists in developing nations; strengthening regulatory frameworks and extending the purview of the research ethics committee in the development and implementation of material transfer agreements; and meaningfully involving local research communities in benefit sharing negotiations.
Collapse
|
37
|
Harper A, Pratt B. Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2022; 17:431-454. [PMID: 34931853 DOI: 10.1177/15562646211058253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The ethics of research involving Aboriginal populations and low and middle-income country populations each developed out of a long history of exploitative research projects and partnerships. Commonalities and differences between the two fields have not yet been examined. This study undertook two independent literature searches for Aboriginal health research ethics and global health research ethics. Content analysis identified shared and differently emphasised ethical principles and concepts between the two fields. Shared ethical concepts like "benefit" and "capacity development" have been developed to guide collaborations in both Aboriginal health research and global health research. However, Aboriginal health research ethics gives much greater prominence to ethical principles that assist in decolonising research practice such as "self-determination", "community-control", and "community ownership". The paper argues that global health research ethics would benefit from giving greater emphasis to these principles to guide research practice, while justice as approached in global health research ethics may inform Aboriginal health research practice. With increasing attention being drawn to the need to decolonise global health research, the lessons Aboriginal health research ethics can offer may be especially timely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Harper
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bridget Pratt
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Queensland Bioethics Centre, 1513Australian Catholic University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sewankambo NK, Kutyabami P. Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research. Infect Dis Poverty 2022; 11:103. [PMID: 36171611 PMCID: PMC9516823 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-022-01031-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies using mass drug administration (MDA) of antibiotics to entire communities have focused global attention on the unique ethical challenges of MDA of antibiotics in research and public health interventions. However, there is no specific guidance for Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to review such trials. We surveyed the literature to identify the unique ethical challenges and to strengthen the competencies of RECs or IRBs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their ethical reviews of these trials. METHODS We employed a desk review. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, combining terms for "mass drug administration" with terms for "research ethics committees," "institutional review boards," and "ethics." We reviewed citations of search results to retrieve additional articles. Only articles published and indexed in the above databases up to 6 January 2022 in English were included. Abstracts (without full articles), books and articles that had exclusive veterinary and environmental focus were excluded. We synthesized the literature to identify particularly challenging ethical issues relevant to antibacterial MDA trials in LMICs. RESULTS The most challenging ethical issues can be categorised into four broad domains: determining the social value of MDA, assessing risks and benefits, engaging all stakeholders meaningfully, and study design-related ethical challenges. These four domains interact and impact each other. Together, they reveal the need for RECs/IRBs to review MDA studies through a broader lens than that of clinical trials per se. From our findings, we propose a framework to guide the RECs and IRBs in LMICs to perform the initial and continuing review of antibiotic MDA trials. We also recommend strengthening the competencies of LMIC RECs or IRBs through ongoing training and collaboration with RECs or IRBs from high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS REC/IRB review of research using MDA of antibiotics plays a critical role in assuring the ethical conduct of MDA studies. Local RECs/IRBs should be empowered to review MDA studies comprehensively and competently in order to advance scientific knowledge about MDA and promote improved global health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson K Sewankambo
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Paul Kutyabami
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alasmar A, Kong AC, So AD, DeCamp M. Ethical challenges in mass drug administration for reducing childhood mortality: a qualitative study. Infect Dis Poverty 2022; 11:99. [PMID: 36114588 PMCID: PMC9482260 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-022-01023-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mass drug administration (MDA) of medications to entire at-risk communities or populations has shown promise in the control and elimination of global infectious diseases. MDA of the broad-spectrum antibiotic azithromycin has demonstrated the potential to reduce childhood mortality in children at risk of premature death in some global settings. However, MDA of antibiotics raises complex ethical challenges, including weighing near-term benefits against longer-term risks—particularly the development of antimicrobial resistance that could diminish antibiotic effectiveness for current or future generations. The aim of this study was to understand how key actors involved in MDA perceive the ethical challenges of MDA. Methods We conducted 35 semi-structured interviews from December 2020–February 2022 with investigators, funders, bioethicists, research ethics committee members, industry representatives, and others from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Interview participants were identified via one of seven MDA studies purposively chosen to represent diversity in terms of use of the antibiotic azithromycin; use of a primary mortality endpoint; and whether the study occurred in a high child mortality country. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory methodology. Results The most frequently discussed ethical challenges related to meaningful community engagement, how to weigh risks and benefits, and the need to target MDA We developed a concept map of how participants considered ethical issues in MDA for child mortality; it emphasizes MDA’s place alongside other public health interventions, empowerment, and equity. Concerns over an ethical double standard in weighing risks and benefits emerged as a unifying theme, albeit one that participants interpreted in radically different ways. Some thought MDA for reducing child mortality was ethically obligatory; others suggested it was impermissible. Conclusions Ethical challenges raised by MDA of antibiotics for childhood mortality—which span socio-cultural issues, the environment, and effects on future generations—require consideration beyond traditional clinical trial review. The appropriate role of MDA also requires attention to concerns over ethical double standards and power dynamics in global health that affect how we view antibiotic use in HICs versus LMICs. Our findings suggest the need to develop additional, comprehensive guidance on managing ethical challenges in MDA. Graphical Abstract ![]()
Collapse
|
40
|
Zulu VC, Syakalima M, Ali J. Ethical dimensions of zoonotic disease research: Perspectives of traditional livestock keepers in Zambia. Wellcome Open Res 2022. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17962.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: With the increase in zoonotic disease research using livestock belonging to traditional livestock keepers (LKs) as research subjects, careful attention to both animal and livestock keeper interests is critically important in Zambia and other similar contexts. Methods: The study aimed to explore ethics-related challenges during zoonotic disease research among LKs where their livestock are included as research subjects. The study was implemented in the Southern province of Zambia in July 2020. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 30 adult male LKs living in livestock-wildlife interface areas where zoonotic diseases are likely to occur, were carried out. The FGDs were done in the local language and audio recorded. Thematic analysis was done using field notes and translated and transcribed recorded interviews. Results: The study found that trust between the researchers and LKs when their livestock are used as research subjects was very cardinal and depended on the continual presence of the local veterinary assistant (VA) during the conduct of research. Conclusions: The LKs could be considered a vulnerable population when their livestock were used as research subjects as, being resource poor, they were looking to researchers to provide benefits yet not fully understanding the research, and thus did not worry so much about consent procedures, bringing into question the validity of the oral consent obtained. The study also found that opportunities to strengthen trust and enhance the research experience could be exploited by researchers conducting research that is locally relevant and desired, being aware of procedural preferences for entering into livestock keeping communities, adequate disclosure of research procedures, respecting conventions and traditional cultural beliefs, and returning results of research. The findings of this study can be used by both researchers as they carry-out zoonotic disease research and by Research Ethics Committees.
Collapse
|
41
|
Kruse G, Zulu T, Ngubane H, Reddy K, Siedner M, Rigotti NA, Seeley J, Ngwenya N, Wong E. The ethics of conducting observational tobacco research without providing treatment to people who use tobacco: a case example from South Africa. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:e009732. [PMID: 35831036 PMCID: PMC9280873 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Kruse
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thando Zulu
- Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa
| | | | - Krishna Reddy
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark Siedner
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Janet Seeley
- Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Nothando Ngwenya
- Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa
| | - Emily Wong
- Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Leroi I, Karanja W, Adrion ER, Alladi S, Custodio N, Goswami SP, Guerchet M, Gubner J, Ibanez A, Ilinica S, Jafri H, Lawlor B, Mohamed AA, Ogunniyi A, Robertson I, Robinson L, Spector A, Varghese M, Weidner W, Caramelli P. Equity and balance in applied dementia research: A charter of conduct and checklist for global collaborations. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 37. [PMID: 35703570 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Iracema Leroi
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Wambui Karanja
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emily R Adrion
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Suvarna Alladi
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Nilton Custodio
- Servicio de Neurología, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Perú
| | - S P Goswami
- All India Institute of Speech & Hearing, Mysuru, India
| | - Maëlenn Guerchet
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jennie Gubner
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Agustin Ibanez
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Stefania Ilinica
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hussain Jafri
- Fatima Jinnah Medical University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Brian Lawlor
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aya Ashour Mohamed
- Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Neurology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Adesola Ogunniyi
- Department of Neurology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Ian Robertson
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Heath Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Aimee Spector
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mathew Varghese
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | | | - Paulo Caramelli
- Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Research Group, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bloomfield LSP, Tracey C, Mbabazi E, Schultz RL, Henderson R, Bardosh K, Randolph S, Paige S. Research Participation Influences Willingness to Reduce Zoonotic Exposure in Uganda. ECOHEALTH 2022; 19:299-314. [PMID: 35674864 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-022-01589-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The majority of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases in people are zoonotic. Despite substantial research in communities adjacent to protected areas with high levels of biodiversity, limited data exist on people's knowledge, attitudes, and practices to avoid exposure to infections from domestic and wild animals. We used a modified grounded-theory framework in QS NVivo to develop a Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey administered at two time points, KAPT1 (April-July 2016) and KAPT2 (February-May 2018) to participants living at the edge of Kibale National Park, Uganda. We measured the difference in willingness to engage in protective behaviors around zoonotic exposure between an Intervention group (n = 61) and a Comparison group (n = 125). Prior to KAPT1, the Intervention group engaged in a human-centered design (HCD) activity identifying behaviors that reduce zoonotic exposure (March-May 2016). Using a difference-in-difference approach, we compared the Intervention and Comparison groups to assess sustained willingness and use of protective behaviors against domestic and wild animal exposures. At KAPT1, Comparison group participants had a significantly lower (p < 0.05) level of willingness to engage in behaviors that increase exposure to zoonoses from domestic animals; Intervention group participants had a significantly higher (p < 0.01) level of willingness to engage in behaviors that increase exposure to zoonoses from wild animals. At KAPT2, the treatment effect was significant (p < 0.01) for sustained willingness to engage in protective behaviors for domestic animal exposure in the Intervention group. There were no significant differences in practices to avoid domestic and wild animal zoonotic exposure between the Intervention and Comparison groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S P Bloomfield
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Christopher Tracey
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
| | - Edith Mbabazi
- Makerere University Biological Field Station, Kibale National Park, Kibale, Uganda
| | - Rhiannon L Schultz
- Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Rebecca Henderson
- Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| | - Kevin Bardosh
- Center for One Health Research, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Shannon Randolph
- School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Sarah Paige
- Global Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Manda-Taylor L, Kufankomwe M, Chatha G, Chipeta E, Mamani-Mategula E, Mwangi MN, Kelaher M, Prang KH, Ataide R, Pasricha SR, Phiri KS. Perceptions and experiences of intravenous iron treatment for anaemia in pregnancy in Malawi: a formative qualitative study. Gates Open Res 2022. [DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13631.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The study objective was to explore opinions, identify experiences, and describe perspectives on the acceptability of intravenous (IV) iron to treat anaemia in pregnancy and identify potential barriers and facilitators of introducing IV iron in the Malawian healthcare system. Methods: We conducted 15 in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions with pregnant women, and seven in-depth interviews with health workers at a community-based health centre in Blantyre and a tertiary hospital in Zomba. Results: Most women who used IV iron treatment during the second trimester of pregnancy reported feeling better and stronger after receiving the intervention. Women perceived that IV iron treatment worked faster and increased their haemoglobin count. However, cultural beliefs that IV iron treatment will cause miscarriage and the perception that study procedures involved Satanism and vampirism practices were barriers to acceptability. Health workers found IV iron treatment easy to administer because it is a single-dose treatment, simultaneously reducing the burden for pregnant women taking daily oral iron tablets. However, health workers expressed concerns about the costs and the need to train health workers before the large-scale implementation and integration of IV iron treatment into Malawi’s routine care. Conclusions: Despite the perceived concerns and challenges experienced in participating in the first IV iron infusion trial in Malawi, participants’ reflections suggest that IV iron infusion is acceptable for treating iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. Participant advocate groups can offer a peer-to-peer education approach to sensitize and engage community members on the benefits of treatment and dispel concerns when the country contemplates integrating IV iron infusion for treating anaemia in pregnancy in Malawi.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Lately, there has been increased research performed in Egypt. In response, the Egyptian
Parliament published its first clinical research law in December 2020. The official
version of the law was translated to English from Arabic and back by an accredited
translation service. We performed an ethical analysis of the law based on the seven
ethical requirements for clinical research proposed by Emanuel et al. and compared it with
other regulations in the Arab region. The law contains provisions that fulfill all
requirements for ethical research to varying degree. Provisions necessitating the sharing
of participants’ data and biospecimens by the Central Intelligence Agency requires further
specifications to ensure privacy protection. Also, the law poses problematic liabilities
that could hamper medical research. Egypt's law compares favorably with other laws in the
region. Potential items that require further specification can be addressed in the
executive regulations currently being drafted for the law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal Matar
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, 8097Uppsala University
| | - Henry J Silverman
- 12264University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chi PC, Owino EA, Jao I, Bejon P, Kapulu M, Marsh V, Kamuya D. Ethical considerations around volunteer payments in a malaria human infection study in Kenya: an embedded empirical ethics study. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:46. [PMID: 35443642 PMCID: PMC9019790 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00783-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Human Infection Studies (HIS) have emerged as an important research approach with the potential to fast track the global development of vaccines and treatments for infectious diseases, including in low resource settings. Given the high level of burdens involved in many HIS, particularly prolonged residency and biological sampling requirements, it can be challenging to identify levels of study payments that provide adequate compensation but avoid 'undue' levels of inducement to participate. Through this embedded ethics study, involving 97 healthy volunteers and other research stakeholders in a malaria HIS programme in Kenya, and using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and observations during and after a malaria HIS, we give a grounded account of ethical issues emerging in relation to study payments in this setting. While careful community, national, international scientific and ethics review processes meant that risks of serious harm were highly unlikely, the levels of motivation to join HIS seen could raise concerns about study payments being too high. Particular value was placed on the reliability, rather than level, of study payment in this setting, where subsistence livelihoods are common. Study volunteers were generally clear about the study aims at the point of recruitment, and this knowledge was retained over a year later, although most reported experiencing more burdens than anticipated at enrolment. Strict study screening procedures, regular clinical and laboratory monitoring of volunteers, with prompt treatment with antimalarial at predetermined endpoints suggested that the risks of serious harm were highly unlikely. Ethical concerns emerged in relation to volunteers' attempts to conceal symptoms, hoping to prolong residency periods and increase study payments; and volunteers making decisions that compromised important family relationships and personal values. Our findings support an interpretation that, although study volunteers were keen to join the study to access cash payments, they also paid attention to other features of the study and the general clinical research landscape, including levels of risk associated with study participation. Overall, our analysis shows that the ethical concerns emerging from the study payments can be addressed through practical measures, hinged on reducing burdens and strengthening communication, raising important issues for research policy and planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Primus Che Chi
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
| | - Esther Awuor Owino
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Irene Jao
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Philip Bejon
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melissa Kapulu
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Centre for Geographic Medicine Research (Coast), Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Miller J, Millum J. Ethical considerations in international clinical trial site selection. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2021-008012. [PMID: 35387769 PMCID: PMC8987699 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
New medicines and vaccines are predominantly tested in high-income countries. However, as the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted, the populations who can benefit from these interventions are not limited to these wealthier regions. One-third of novel Food and Drug Administration approved drugs, sponsored by large companies, treat infectious diseases like tuberculosis and HIV, which disproportionately affect low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The medicines for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are also relevant to LMIC health needs, as over three-quarters of deaths from NCDs occur in LMICs. There are concerns clinical trial data may not extrapolate across geographical regions, as product effectiveness can vary substantially by region. The pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, for example, had markedly lower efficacy in LMICs. Efficacy variations have also been found for other vaccines and drugs. We argue there are strong ethical arguments for remedying some of this uneven distribution of clinical trial sites by geography and income. Chief among them, is that these disparities can impede equitable access to the benefits of clinical research, such as representation in the evidence base generated to guide prescribing and use of medicines and vaccines. We suggest trial site locations should be made more transparent and for later stage trials their selection should be informed by the global distribution of disease burden targeted by an experimental product. Countries with high prevalence, incidence, severity or infection transmission rates for targeted diseases should have real opportunities to engage in and enrol their populations in trials for novel medicines and vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Miller
- Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA,Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA,Program for Biomedical Ethics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA,Yale Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Joseph Millum
- Philosophy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hickey G, Porter K, Tembo D, Rennard U, Tholanah M, Beresford P, Chandler D, Chimbari M, Coldham T, Dikomitis L, Dziro B, Ekiikina PO, Khattak MI, Montenegro CR, Mumba N, Musesengwa R, Nelson E, Nhunzvi C, Ramirez CM, Staniszewska S. What Does “Good” Community and Public Engagement Look Like? Developing Relationships With Community Members in Global Health Research. Front Public Health 2022; 9:776940. [PMID: 35155342 PMCID: PMC8830293 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.776940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Community and public engagement (CPE) is increasingly becoming a key component in global health research. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is one of the leading funders in the UK of global health research and requires a robust CPE element in the research it funds, along with CPE monitoring and evaluation. But what does “good” CPE look like? And what factors facilitate or inhibit good CPE? Addressing these questions would help ensure clarity of expectations of award holders, and inform effective monitoring frameworks and the development of guidance. The work reported upon here builds on existing guidance and is a first step in trying to identify the key components of what “good” CPE looks like, which can be used for all approaches to global health research and in a range of different settings and contexts. This article draws on data collected as part of an evaluation of CPE by 53 NIHR-funded award holders to provide insights on CPE practice in global health research. This data was then debated, developed and refined by a group of researchers, CPE specialists and public contributors to explore what “good” CPE looks like, and the barriers and facilitators to good CPE. A key finding was the importance, for some research, of investing in and developing long term relationships with communities, perhaps beyond the life cycle of a project; this was regarded as crucial to the development of trust, addressing power differentials and ensuring the legacy of the research was of benefit to the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Hickey
- Wessex Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Porter
- Wessex Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Katie Porter
| | - Doreen Tembo
- Wessex Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Una Rennard
- Public Contributor, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Martha Tholanah
- AIDS Clinical Trial Group Clinical Research Site Community Advisory Board, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
- Making Waves Network, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Peter Beresford
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - David Chandler
- The Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Alliance, St Albans, United Kingdom
| | - Moses Chimbari
- School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- Department of Public Health, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe
| | - Tina Coldham
- National Institute for Health Research Centre for Engagement and Dissemination, London, United Kingdom
- School for Social Care Research, National Institute for Health Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Dikomitis
- Kent and Medway Medical School, University of Kent and Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Biggy Dziro
- African Mental Health Research Initiative (AMARI), Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | - Maria I. Khattak
- Institute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Cristian R. Montenegro
- Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- Escuela de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Noni Mumba
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Rosemary Musesengwa
- Medical Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Erica Nelson
- Health and Nutrition Cluster, The Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Clement Nhunzvi
- College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Caroline M. Ramirez
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Ateneo de Manila University, Pasig, Philippines
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sophie Staniszewska
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Phillips E, Turner P, Ngure F, Kassim N, Makule E, Smith L, Nelson R, Stoltzfus R. Ethical considerations in the design and conduct of a cluster-randomised mycotoxin mitigation trial in Tanzania. WORLD MYCOTOXIN J 2022. [DOI: 10.3920/wmj2021.2705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Aflatoxins are fungal metabolites that commonly contaminate staple food crops in tropical regions. Acute aflatoxin consumption in very high concentration causes aflatoxicosis and acute liver failure, while chronic, moderate levels of intake cause hepatocellular carcinoma. The effects of frequent moderate- to high-level exposure during infancy, however, is less clearly understood. Half a billion people in low- and middle-income countries continue to be exposed to aflatoxins through dietary consumption, in part because of lack of enforcement of regulatory limits and few feasible long-term mitigation options in these settings. Several epidemiologic studies have shown an association between aflatoxin exposure in infants and young children and growth failure, but strong experimental evidence is lacking. The Mycotoxin Mitigation Trial conducted in Tanzania was a cluster-randomised trial to assess the effect of a reduced aflatoxin diet on linear growth. Prior to the design and implementation of this trial, a group of multi-disciplinary and multi-national scientists reviewed literature in biomedical, public health, environmental health ethics. In this paper we outline the most salient ethical questions and dilemmas in the potential conduct of such a study and describe the ethical precedents and principles that informed our decision-making processes and ultimate study protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Phillips
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, 244 Garden, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - P.C. Turner
- MIAEH, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA
| | - F.M. Ngure
- Independent Research Consultant, Arusha, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya
| | - N. Kassim
- Department of Food Biotechnology and Nutritional Sciences, (FBNS), School of Life Science and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - E. Makule
- Department of Food Biotechnology and Nutritional Sciences, (FBNS), School of Life Science and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - L.E. Smith
- Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - R.J. Nelson
- School of Integrative Plant Science and Department of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - R.J. Stoltzfus
- Goshen College, 1700 S. Main Street, Goshen, Indiana 46526, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vincent R, Adhikari B, Duddy C, Richardson E, Wong G, Lavery J, Molyneux S. 'Working relationships' across difference - a realist review of community engagement with malaria research. Wellcome Open Res 2022; 7:13. [PMID: 37621950 PMCID: PMC10444998 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17192.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Community engagement (CE) is increasingly accepted as a critical aspect of health research, because of its potential to make research more ethical, relevant and well implemented. While CE activities linked to health research have proliferated in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), and are increasingly described in published literature, there is a lack of conceptual clarity around how engagement is understood to 'work', and the aims and purposes of engagement are varied and often not made explicit. Ultimately, the evidence base for engagement remains underdeveloped. Methods: To develop explanations for how and why CE with health research contributes to the pattern of outcomes observed in published literature , we conducted a realist review of CE with malaria research - a theory driven approach to evidence synthesis. Results: We found that community engagement relies on the development of provisional 'working relationships' across differences, primarily of wealth, power and culture. These relationships are rooted in interactions that are experienced as relatively responsive and respectful, and that bring tangible research related benefits. Contextual factors affecting development of working relationships include the facilitating influence of research organisation commitment to and resources for engagement, and constraining factors linked to the prevailing 'dominant health research paradigm context', such as: differences of wealth and power between research centres and local populations and health systems; histories of colonialism and vertical health interventions; and external funding and control of health research. Conclusions: The development of working relationships contributes to greater acceptance and participation in research by local stakeholders, who are particularly interested in research related access to health care and other benefits. At the same time, such relationships may involve an accommodation of some ethically problematic characteristics of the dominant health research paradigm, and thereby reproduce this paradigm rather than challenge it with a different logic of collaborative partnership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Vincent
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
- Robin Vincent Learning and Evaluation Ltd, Sheffield, S89FH, UK
| | - Bipin Adhikari
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Claire Duddy
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Emma Richardson
- Health Research, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - James Lavery
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
- Center for Ethics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme, University of Oxford, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| | - The REAL team: Mary Chambers, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Al Davies, Kate Gooding, Dorcas Kamuya, Vicki Marsh, Noni Mumba, Deborah Nyirenda, and Paulina Tindana.
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
- Robin Vincent Learning and Evaluation Ltd, Sheffield, S89FH, UK
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
- Health Research, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
- Center for Ethics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme, University of Oxford, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|