Community structure determines the predictability of population collapse

Early warning signals (EWS) are phenomenological tools that have been proposed as predictors of the collapse of biological systems. Although a growing body of work has shown the utility of EWS based on either statistics derived from abundance data or shifts in phenotypic traits such as body size, so far this work has largely focused on single species populations.

However, to predict reliably the future state of ecological systems, which inherently could consist of multiple species, understanding how reliable such signals are in a community context is critical.

Here, reconciling quantitative trait evolution and Lotka–Volterra equations, which allow us to track both abundance and mean traits, we simulate the collapse of populations embedded in mutualistic and multi‐trophic predator–prey communities. Using these simulations and warning signals derived from both population‐ and community‐level data, we showed the utility of abundance‐based EWS, as well as metrics derived from stability‐landscape theory (e.g. width and depth of the basin of attraction), were fundamentally linked. Thus, the depth and width of such stability‐landscape curves could be used to identify which species should exhibit the strongest EWS of collapse.

The probability a species displays both trait and abundance‐based EWS was dependent on its position in a community, with some species able to act as indicator species. In addition, our results also demonstrated that in general trait‐based EWS were less reliable in comparison with abundance‐based EWS in forecasting species collapses in our simulated communities. Furthermore, community‐level abundance‐based EWS were fairly reliable in comparison with their species‐level counterparts in forecasting species‐level collapses.

Our study suggests a holistic framework that combines abundance‐based EWS and metrics derived from stability‐landscape theory that may help in forecasting species loss in a community context.

No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes

Reductions in animal body size over recent decades are often interpreted as an adaptive evolutionary response to climate warming. However, for reductions in size to reflect adaptive evolution, directional selection on body size within populations must have become negative, or where already negative, to have become more so, as temperatures increased. To test this hypothesis, we performed traditional and phylogenetic meta-analyses of the association between annual estimates of directional selection on body size from wild populations and annual mean temperatures from 39 longitudinal studies. We found no evidence that warmer environments were associated with selection for smaller size. Instead, selection consistently favoured larger individuals, and was invariant to temperature. These patterns were similar in ectotherms and endotherms. An analysis using year rather than temperature revealed similar patterns, suggesting no evidence that selection has changed over time, and also indicating that the lack of association with annual temperature was not an artefact of choosing an erroneous time window for aggregating the temperature data. Although phenotypic trends in size will be driven by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, our results suggest little evidence for a necessary ingredient-negative directional selection-for declines in body size to be considered an adaptive evolutionary response to changing selection pressures.

Individual and Population Differences Shape Species Interactions and Natural Selection

Trait variation is central to our understanding of species interactions, and trait variation arising within species is increasingly recognized as an important component of community ecology. Ecologists generally consider intraspecific variation either among or within populations, yet these differences can interact to create patterns of species interactions. These differences can also affect species interactions by altering processes occurring at distinct scales. Specifically, intraspecific variation may shape species interactions simply by shifting a population's position along a trait-function map or by shifting the relationship between traits and their ecological function. I test these ideas by manipulating within- and among-population intraspecific variation in wild populations of a gall-forming insect before quantifying species interactions and phenotypic selection. Within- and among-population differences in gall size interact to affect attack rates by an enemy community, but among-population differences were far more consequential. Intraspecific differences shaped species interactions by both shifting the position of populations along the trait-function map and altering the relationship between traits and their function, with ultimate consequences for patterns of natural selection. I suggest that intraspecific variation can affect communities and natural selection by acting through individual- and population-level mechanisms.