1
|
Nachankar A, Pelak M, Schafasand M, Martino G, Tubin S, Hug E, Carlino A, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Stock M, Fossati P. Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma: Preliminary Clinical Outcomes and the MedAustron Approach for Reporting RBE-Weighted Dose With 2 Models. Int J Part Ther 2025; 15:100738. [PMID: 39896178 PMCID: PMC11786705 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2024] [Revised: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose Head and neck mucosal melanomas (HNMMs) are aggressive, radiotherapy-resistant cancers. Previous JCROS studies demonstrated improved local control with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This study evaluates early outcomes of CIRT for HNMM using the European and Japanese relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-adapted dose prescriptions. Materials and Methods Between November 2019 and April 2023, 14 HNMM patients received CIRT treatment. Postoperative CIRT for R2 resection: 9 cases; biopsies only: 5 cases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors used as primary treatment: 6 cases; salvage: 8 cases. CIRT delivered in DRBE dose of 68.8 (64.5-68.8) Gy (RBE)/16 fractions, optimized with the local effect model I (LEM-I, European) for RBE-weighted dose, recalculated using the modified-microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM, Japanese). Results HNMM tumor and nodal stages: cT3: 2 (14%), cT4: 12 (86%), cN1: 1 (7%). The median follow-up was 22 months (range, 4-54). The 2-year local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were 100%, 89% (CI, 71-100), 64% (CI, 44-95), and 43% (CI, 22-84), respectively. The median relative volumetric tumor regression at 3, 6, and 12 months post-CIRT was 40%, 63%, and 72%, respectively. CIRT-associated late toxicities were G3 mucositis: 2 (14%) and G3 anosmia: 1 (7%). The immune checkpoint inhibition-related late toxicities were G2 hypophysitis: 1 (11%) and G3 peripheral neuropathy: 1 (11%). The average attainable DRBE coverage for 95% of high-dose clinical target volume was 63.2 ± 6 Gy (RBE) (LEM-I) and 57.4 ± 5 Gy (RBE) (mMKM). The LETd distribution in high-dose clinical target volume was satisfactory, LETd50% (median) = 57.3 ± 6 keV/µm and LETd98% (near minimum) = 46.5 ± 6.1 keV/µm. Conclusion Bi-RBE model (LEM-I, mMKM) optimized CIRT protocol improved dose comparability of plans between different systems. It also improved intratumoral LETd distribution and resulted in rapid tumor regression, favorable toxicity profile, and excellent early loco-regional control. It provides a promising alternative to surgery, though distant metastasis remains the key prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Nachankar
- ACMIT Gmbh, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Maciej Pelak
- University Clinic for Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology of the Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mansure Schafasand
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Giovanna Martino
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Slavisa Tubin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Eugen Hug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Antonio Carlino
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | | | - Markus Stock
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Piero Fossati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Division Radiation Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li S, Gao N, Cheng B, Liu J, Chang Y, Pei X, Xu XG. A new GPU-based Monte Carlo code for helium ion therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2025:10.1007/s00066-024-02357-w. [PMID: 39920366 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02357-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 12/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE This work presents an effort to extend the capabilities of the previously introduced GPU-based Monte Carlo code ARCHER for helium ion therapy. METHODS ARCHER performs helium ion transport simulations in voxelized geometry, covering kinetic energy levels up to 220 MeV/u. The physical processes are modeled using a class II condensed-history algorithm, considering ionization, energy straggling, multiple scattering, and elastic and inelastic nuclear interactions. A new nuclear-event-repeat algorithm is proposed to generate inelastic nuclear reaction products. Secondary protons, deuterons, tritons, and 3He particles are tracked, while other particles either deposit their energy locally or are ignored. The code is developed under the compute unified device architecture (CUDA) platform to improve computational efficiency. Validations are conducted by benchmarking our code against TOPAS in different phantoms. RESULTS Dose distribution comparisons demonstrate strong agreement between our code and TOPAS. The mean point-by-point local relative errors in the region where the dose exceeds 10% of the maximum dose range from 0.25% to 1.31% for all phantoms. In the strict 1%/1 mm criterion, gamma passing rates for a head-neck case, chest case, and prostate case are 99.8%, 96.9%, and 99.6%, respectively. Except for the lung phantom, ARCHER takes less than 10 s to simulate 10 million primary helium ions using a single NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 card (NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, USA), while TOPAS requires several minutes on a computational platform with two Intel Xeon Gold 6348 CPUs (Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, USA) with 56 cores. CONCLUSION This work presents the development and benchmarking of the first GPU-based dose engine for helium ion therapy. The code has been proven to achieve high levels of accuracy and efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijun Li
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026, Hefei, China
| | - Ning Gao
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026, Hefei, China
| | - Bo Cheng
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026, Hefei, China
| | - Junyi Liu
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026, Hefei, China
| | - Yankui Chang
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026, Hefei, China
| | - Xi Pei
- Anhui Wisdom Technology Company Limited, 230088, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Xie George Xu
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 230026, Hefei, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, 230001, Hefei, China.
- College of Nuclear Science and Technology and Department of Radiation Oncology of the 1st Affiliated Hospital, Director, Institute of Nuclear Medical Physics, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hartzell S, Guan F, Magro G, Taylor P, Taddei PJ, Peterson CB, Kry S. Contribution of Nuclear Fragmentation to Dose and RBE in Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy. Radiat Res 2025; 203:96-106. [PMID: 39862066 DOI: 10.1667/rade-24-00164.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/26/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
Variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon radiotherapy may be calculated using several models, including the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM), stochastic MKM (SMKM), repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model, and local effect model I (LEM), which have not been thoroughly compared. In this work, we compared how these four models handle carbon beam fragmentation, providing insight into where model differences arise. Monoenergetic and spread-out Bragg peak carbon beams incident on a water phantom were simulated using Monte Carlo. Using these beams, input parameters for each model (microdosimetric spectra, DNA double-strand break yield, kinetic energy spectra, physical dose fragment contributions) were calculated for each contributing carbon beam fragment (hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium, boron, secondary carbon, primary carbon, electrons, and "other"). Scored input parameters for each fragment were used to calculate linear (α) and quadratic (β) parameters according to each model, which were combined with reference α and β values and absorbed physical dose to calculate RBE. Contributions from secondary fragments were found to exceed 30% of the total physical dose. Using identical beam parameters, the four models produced not only different RBE values but also different RBE trends. In all models, RBE was highest for secondary carbon ions. Beyond secondary carbons, the RBE magnitude typically increased with the atomic number of the fragment, but RBE trends differed dramatically by model and beamline region (entrance, spread-out Bragg peak, and tail). Variations in fragment RBE were large enough to be apparent in biological dose predictions. This study demonstrated that fragmentation is a nonnegligible consideration in carbon radiotherapy. Our findings identified differences in RBE among specific fragments and the four models, contributing to variability in the total biological dose across models. Because these findings emphasize differences in how various models handle carbon beam fragments, greater care should be taken in characterization of secondary fragments in particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Hartzell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Fada Guan
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Department of Medical Physics, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paige Taylor
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Phillip J Taddei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christine B Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen Kry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maury P, Hirayama R, Li X, Mahou P, Schanne-Klein MC, Lacombe S, Gref R, Porcel E. Synergistic effect of Gemcitabin-loaded metal organic frameworks nanoparticles with particle therapy. Int J Pharm 2024; 665:124721. [PMID: 39293579 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024]
Abstract
Combination of nanoagents with radiations has opened up new perspectives in cancer treatment, improving both tumor diagnosis and therapeutic index. This work presents the first investigation of an innovative strategy that combines porous metal-organic frameworks (nanoMOFs) loaded with the anti-cancer drug Gemcitabine monophosphate (GemMP) and particle therapy-a globally emerging technique that offers more precise radiation targeting and enhanced biological efficacy compared to conventional radiotherapy. This radiochemotherapy has been confronted with two major obstacles limiting the efficacy of therapeutics when tested in vivo: (i) the presence of hypoxia, one of the most important causes for radiotherapy failure and (ii) the presence of a microenvironment, main biological barrier to the direct penetration of nanoparticles into cancer cells. On the one hand, this study explore the effects of hypoxia on drug delivery systems in combination with radiation, demonstrating that GemMP-loaded nanoMOFs significantly enhance the anticancer efficacy of particle therapy under both normoxic (pO2 = 20 %) and hypoxic (pO2 = 0.5 %) conditions. Notably, the presence of GemMP-loaded nanoMOFs allows the irradiation dose to be reduced by 1.4-fold in normoxia and at least 1.6-fold in hypoxia, achieving the same cytotoxic effect (SF=10 %) as carbon or helium ions alone. Synergistic effects between GemMP-loaded nanoMOFs and radiations have been observed and quantified. On the other hand, we also highlighted the ability of the nanoMOFs to diffuse through an extracellular matrix and accumulate in cells. An higher effect of the encapsulated GemMP than the free drug was observed, confirming the key role of the nanoMOFs in transporting the active substance to the cancer cells as a Trojan horse. This paves the way to the design of "all-in-one" nanodrugs where each component plays a role in the optimization of cancer therapy to maximize cytotoxic effects on hypoxic tumor cells while minimizing toxicity on healthy tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Maury
- Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), 91405 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U1030, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94800, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Département de radiothérapie, F-94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Ryoichi Hirayama
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Xue Li
- Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Pierre Mahou
- Laboratoire d'Optique et Biosciences (LOB), Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
| | - Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein
- Laboratoire d'Optique et Biosciences (LOB), Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
| | - Sandrine Lacombe
- Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Ruxandra Gref
- Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Erika Porcel
- Université Paris Saclay, CNRS, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (ISMO), 91405 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Malouff TD, Newpower M, Bush A, Seneviratne D, Ebner DK. A Practical Primer on Particle Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:590-602. [PMID: 38844118 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Particle therapy is a promising treatment technique that is becoming more commonly used. Although proton beam therapy remains the most commonly used particle therapy, multiple other heavier ions have been used in the preclinical and clinical settings, each with its own unique properties. This practical review aims to summarize the differences between the studied particles, discussing their radiobiological and physical properties with additional review of the available clinical data. METHODS AND MATERIALS A search was carried out on the PubMed databases with search terms related to each particle. Relevant radiobiology, physics, and clinical studies were included. The articles were summarized to provide a practical resource for practicing clinicians. RESULTS A total of 113 articles and texts were included in our narrative review. Currently, proton beam therapy has the most data and is the most widely used, followed by carbon, helium, and neutrons. Although oxygen, neon, silicon, and argon have been used clinically, their future use will likely remain limited as monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This review summarizes the properties of each of the clinically relevant particles. Protons, helium, and carbon will likely remain the most commonly used, although multi-ion therapy is an emerging technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Mark Newpower
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Aaron Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Danushka Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Daniel K Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mein S, Wuyckens S, Li X, Both S, Carabe A, Vera MC, Engwall E, Francesco F, Graeff C, Gu W, Hong L, Inaniwa T, Janssens G, de Jong B, Li T, Liang X, Liu G, Lomax A, Mackie T, Mairani A, Mazal A, Nesteruk KP, Paganetti H, Pérez Moreno JM, Schreuder N, Soukup M, Tanaka S, Tessonnier T, Volz L, Zhao L, Ding X. Particle arc therapy: Status and potential. Radiother Oncol 2024; 199:110434. [PMID: 39009306 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
There is a rising interest in developing and utilizing arc delivery techniques with charged particle beams, e.g., proton, carbon or other ions, for clinical implementation. In this work, perspectives from the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) 2022 physics workshop on particle arc therapy are reported. This outlook provides an outline and prospective vision for the path forward to clinically deliverable proton, carbon, and other ion arc treatments. Through the collaboration among industry, academic, and clinical research and development, the scientific landscape and outlook for particle arc therapy are presented here to help our community understand the physics, radiobiology, and clinical principles. The work is presented in three main sections: (i) treatment planning, (ii) treatment delivery, and (iii) clinical outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sophie Wuyckens
- UCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Proton Therapy Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Macarena Chocan Vera
- UCLouvain, Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Christian Graeff
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Wenbo Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Liu Hong
- Ion Beam Applications SA, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Bas de Jong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Taoran Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Proton Therapy Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA; Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Antony Lomax
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; ETH, Department of Physics, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Mackie
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Konrad P Nesteruk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sodai Tanaka
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Proton Therapy Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahmad R, Barcellini A, Baumann K, Benje M, Bender T, Bragado P, Charalampopoulou A, Chowdhury R, Davis AJ, Ebner DK, Eley J, Kloeber JA, Mutter RW, Friedrich T, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Helm A, Ibáñez-Moragues M, Iturri L, Jansen J, Morcillo MÁ, Puerta D, Kokko AP, Sánchez-Parcerisa D, Scifoni E, Shimokawa T, Sokol O, Story MD, Thariat J, Tinganelli W, Tommasino F, Vandevoorde C, von Neubeck C. Particle Beam Radiobiology Status and Challenges: A PTCOG Radiobiology Subcommittee Report. Int J Part Ther 2024; 13:100626. [PMID: 39258166 PMCID: PMC11386331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy (PT) represents a significant advancement in cancer treatment, precisely targeting tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissues thanks to the unique depth-dose profiles of the charged particles. Furthermore, their linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness enhance their capability to treat radioresistant tumors, including hypoxic ones. Over the years, extensive research has paved the way for PT's clinical application, and current efforts aim to refine its efficacy and precision, minimizing the toxicities. In this regard, radiobiology research is evolving toward integrating biotechnology to advance drug discovery and radiation therapy optimization. This shift from basic radiobiology to understanding the molecular mechanisms of PT aims to expand the therapeutic window through innovative dose delivery regimens and combined therapy approaches. This review, written by over 30 contributors from various countries, provides a comprehensive look at key research areas and new developments in PT radiobiology, emphasizing the innovations and techniques transforming the field, ranging from the radiobiology of new irradiation modalities to multimodal radiation therapy and modeling efforts. We highlight both advancements and knowledge gaps, with the aim of improving the understanding and application of PT in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Ahmad
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Clinical Department Radiation Oncology Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Kilian Baumann
- Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Malte Benje
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Tamara Bender
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alexandra Charalampopoulou
- University School for Advanced Studies (IUSS), Pavia, Italy
- Radiobiology Unit, Development and Research Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Reema Chowdhury
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Anthony J. Davis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel K. Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Jake A. Kloeber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert W. Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Helm
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marta Ibáñez-Moragues
- Medical Applications of Ionizing Radiation Unit, Technology Department, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Jeannette Jansen
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Miguel Ángel Morcillo
- Medical Applications of Ionizing Radiation Unit, Technology Department, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Puerta
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Emanuele Scifoni
- TIFPA-INFN - Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy
| | - Takashi Shimokawa
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Olga Sokol
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre François Baclesse, Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen, France
| | - Walter Tinganelli
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- TIFPA-INFN - Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muñoz ID, García-Calderón D, Felix-Bautista R, Burigo LN, Christensen JB, Brons S, Runz A, Häring P, Greilich S, Seco J, Jäkel O. Linear Energy Transfer Measurements and Estimation of Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton and Helium Ion Beams Using Fluorescent Nuclear Track Detectors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:205-215. [PMID: 38437925 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to develop a methodology for assessing the linear energy transfer (LET) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in clinical proton and helium ion beams using fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs). METHODS AND MATERIALS FNTDs were exposed behind solid water to proton and helium (4He) ion spread-out Bragg peaks. Detectors were imaged with a confocal microscope, and the LET spectra were derived from the fluorescence intensity. The track- and dose-averaged LET (LETF and LETD, respectively) were calculated from the LET spectra. LET measurements were used as input on RBE models to estimate the RBE. Human alveolar adenocarcinoma cells (A549) were exposed at the same positions as the FNTDs. The RBE was calculated from the resulting survival curves. All measurements were compared with Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS For protons, average relative differences between measurements and simulations were 6% and 19% for LETF and LETD, respectively. For helium ions, the same differences were 11% for both quantities. The position of the experimental LET spectra primary peaks agreed with the simulations within 9% and 14% for protons and helium ions, respectively. For the RBE models using LETD as input, FNTD-based RBE values ranged from 1.02 ± 0.01 to 1.25 ± 0.04 and from 1.08 ± 0.09 to 2.68 ± 1.26 for protons and helium ions, respectively. The average relative differences between these values and simulations were 2% and 4%. For A549 cells, the RBE ranged from 1.05 ± 0.07 to 1.47 ± 0.09 and from 0.89 ± 0.06 to 3.28 ± 0.20 for protons and helium ions, respectively. Regarding the RBE-weighted dose (2.0 Gy at the spread-out Bragg peak), the differences between simulations and measurements were below 0.10 Gy. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates for the first time that FNTDs can be used to perform direct LET measurements and to estimate the RBE in clinical proton and helium ion beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván D Muñoz
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel García-Calderón
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renato Felix-Bautista
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lucas N Burigo
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeppe Brage Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Greilich
- Berthold Technologies GmbH & Co KG, Units of Radiation Protection and Bioanalytics, Bad Wildbad, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Melia E, Parsons JL. The Potential for Targeting G 2/M Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinases in Enhancing the Efficacy of Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3016. [PMID: 39272874 PMCID: PMC11394570 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the main cancer treatments being used for ~50% of all cancer patients. Conventional radiotherapy typically utilises X-rays (photons); however, there is increasing use of particle beam therapy (PBT), such as protons and carbon ions. This is because PBT elicits significant benefits through more precise dose delivery to the cancer than X-rays, but also due to the increases in linear energy transfer (LET) that lead to more enhanced biological effectiveness. Despite the radiotherapy type, the introduction of DNA damage ultimately drives the therapeutic response through stimulating cancer cell death. To combat this, cells harbour cell cycle checkpoints that enables time for efficient DNA damage repair. Interestingly, cancer cells frequently have mutations in key genes such as TP53 and ATM that drive the G1/S checkpoint, whereas the G2/M checkpoint driven through ATR, Chk1 and Wee1 remains intact. Therefore, targeting the G2/M checkpoint through specific inhibitors is considered an important strategy for enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy. In this review, we focus on inhibitors of Chk1 and Wee1 kinases and present the current biological evidence supporting their utility as radiosensitisers with different radiotherapy modalities, as well as clinical trials that have and are investigating their potential for cancer patient benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Melia
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Jason L Parsons
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fira AMR, Keta OD, Petković VD, Đorđević M, Petringa G, Fattori S, Catalano R, Cirrone GP, Cuttone G, Sakata D, Tran NH, Chatzipapas K, Incerti S, Petrović IM. In vitro validation of helium ion irradiations as a function of linear energy transfer in radioresistant human malignant cells. Int J Radiat Biol 2024; 100:1426-1437. [PMID: 39058324 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2024.2373752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Based on considerable interest to enlarge the experimental database of radioresistant cells after their irradiation with helium ions, HTB140, MCF-7 and HTB177 human malignant cells are exposed to helium ion beams having different linear energy transfer (LET). MATERIALS AND METHODS The cells are irradiated along the widened 62 MeV/u helium ion Bragg peak, providing LET of 4.9, 9.8, 23.4 and 36.8 keV/µm. Numerical simulations with the Geant4 toolkit are used for the experimental design. Cell survival is evaluated and compared with reference γ-rays. DNA double strand breaks are assessed via γ-H2AX foci. RESULTS With the increase of LET, surviving fractions at 2 Gy decrease, while RBE (2 Gy, γ) gradually increase. For HTB140 cells, above the dose of 4 Gy, a slight saturation of survival is observed while the increase of RBE (2 Gy, γ) remains unaffected. With the increase of LET the increase of γ-H2AX foci is revealed at 0.5 h after irradiation. There is no significant difference in the number of foci between the cell lines for the same LET. From 0.5 to 24 h, the number of foci drops reaching its residual level. For each time point, there are small differences in DNA DSB among the three cell lines. CONCLUSION Analyses of data acquired for the three cell lines irradiated by helium ions, having different LET, reveal high elimination capacity and creation of a large number of DNA DSB with respect to γ-rays, and are between those reported for protons and carbon ions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Otilija D Keta
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vladana D Petković
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Miloš Đorđević
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Giada Petringa
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, LNS, Catania, Italy
| | - Serena Fattori
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, LNS, Catania, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Ngoc Hoang Tran
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, LP2I, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | | | - Sebastien Incerti
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, LP2I, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | - Ivan M Petrović
- Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Impey S, Raber J. Irradiation and Alterations in Hippocampal DNA Methylation. EPIGENOMES 2024; 8:27. [PMID: 39051185 PMCID: PMC11270359 DOI: 10.3390/epigenomes8030027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The response of the brain to radiation is important for cancer patients receiving whole or partial brain irradiation or total body irradiation, those exposed to irradiation as part of a nuclear accident or a nuclear war or terrorism event, and for astronauts during and following space missions. The mechanisms mediating the effects of irradiation on the hippocampus might be associated with alterations in hippocampal DNA methylation. Changes in cytosine methylation involving the addition of a methyl group to cytosine (5 mC) and especially those involving the addition of a hydroxy group to 5 mC (hydroxymethylcytosine or 5 hmC) play a key role in regulating the expression of genes required for hippocampal function. In this review article, we will discuss the effects of radiation on hippocampal DNA methylation and whether these effects are associated with hippocampus-dependent cognitive measures and molecular measures in the hippocampus involved in cognitive measures. We will also discuss whether the radiation-induced changes in hippocampal DNA methylation show an overlap across different doses of heavy ion irradiation and across irradiation with different ions. We will also discuss whether the DNA methylation changes show a tissue-dependent response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soren Impey
- Dow Neurobiology Laboratories, Legacy Research Institute Legacy Health Systems, 1225 NE 2nd Ave, Portland, OR 97232, USA
- Departments of Behavioral Neuroscience, Neurology, and Radiation Medicine, Division of Neuroscience, ONPRC, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jacob Raber
- Departments of Behavioral Neuroscience, Neurology, and Radiation Medicine, Division of Neuroscience, ONPRC, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tseng YH, Hsu CA, Chou YB. Comparing efficacy of charged-particle therapy with brachytherapy in treatment of uveal melanoma. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:1882-1890. [PMID: 38565600 PMCID: PMC11226678 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03035-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular tumour in adults. The most used eye-preserving treatments are charged-particle therapy (CPT) and brachytherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacies and complications of these two radiotherapies. METHODS We searched EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2012 to December 2022. Two independent reviewers identified controlled studies comparing outcomes of CPT versus brachytherapy. Case series that utilize either treatment modality were also reviewed. RESULTS One hundred fifty studies met the eligibility criteria, including 2 randomized control trials, 5 controlled cohort studies, and 143 case series studies. We found significant reduction in local recurrence rate among patients treated with CPT compared to brachytherapy (Odds ratio[OR] 0.38, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.60, p < 0.01). Analysis also showed a trend of increased risks of secondary glaucoma after CPT. No statistically significant differences were found in analyzing risks of mortality, enucleation, and cataract. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggested no difference in mortality, enucleation rate and cataract formation rate comparing the two treatments. Lower local recurrence rate and possibly higher secondary glaucoma incidence was noted among patients treated with CPT. Nevertheless, the overall level of evidence is limited, and further high-quality studies are necessary to provide a more definitive conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsuan Tseng
- Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Chia-An Hsu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Bai Chou
- Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Kim JY, Deng M, Seidensaal K, Held T, Herfarth K, Haberer T, Debus J, Mairani A, Harrabi S, Tessonnier T. Helium Ion Therapy for Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1993. [PMID: 38893114 PMCID: PMC11171253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Helium ion therapy (HRT) is a promising modality for the treatment of pediatric tumors and those located close to critical structures due to the favorable biophysical properties of helium ions. This in silico study aimed to explore the potential benefits of HRT in advanced juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) compared to proton therapy (PRT). We assessed 11 consecutive patients previously treated with PRT for JNA in a definitive or postoperative setting with a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) weighted dose of 45 Gy (RBE) in 25 fractions at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. HRT plans were designed retrospectively for dosimetric comparisons and risk assessments of radiation-induced complications. HRT led to enhanced target coverage in all patients, along with sparing of critical organs at risk, including a reduction in the brain integral dose by approximately 27%. In terms of estimated risks of radiation-induced complications, HRT led to a reduction in ocular toxicity, cataract development, xerostomia, tinnitus, alopecia and delayed recall. Similarly, HRT led to reduced estimated risks of radiation-induced secondary neoplasms, with a mean excess absolute risk reduction of approximately 30% for secondary CNS malignancies. HRT is a promising modality for advanced JNA, with the potential for enhanced sparing of healthy tissue and thus reduced radiation-induced acute and long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Partner Site, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Medical Physics Department, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Inaniwa T, Kanematsu N, Koto M. Biological dose optimization incorporating intra-tumoural cellular radiosensitivity heterogeneity in ion-beam therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115017. [PMID: 38636504 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Treatment plans of ion-beam therapy have been made under an assumption that all cancer cells within a tumour equally respond to a given radiation dose. However, an intra-tumoural cellular radiosensitivity heterogeneity clearly exists, and it may lead to an overestimation of therapeutic effects of the radiation. The purpose of this study is to develop a biological model that can incorporate the radiosensitivity heterogeneity into biological optimization for ion-beam therapy treatment planning.Approach.The radiosensitivity heterogeneity was modeled as the variability of a cell-line specific parameter in the microdosimetric kinetic model following the gamma distribution. To validate the developed intra-tumoural-radiosensitivity-heterogeneity-incorporated microdosimetric kinetic (HMK) model, a treatment plan with H-ion beams was made for a chordoma case, assuming a radiosensitivity heterogeneous region within the tumour. To investigate the effects of the radiosensitivity heterogeneity on the biological effectiveness of H-, He-, C-, O-, and Ne-ion beams, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose distributions were planned for a cuboid target with the stated ion beams without considering the heterogeneity. The planned dose distributions were then recalculated by taking the heterogeneity into account.Main results. The cell survival fraction and corresponding RBE-weighted dose were formulated based on the HMK model. The first derivative of the RBE-weighted dose distribution was also derived, which is needed for fast biological optimization. For the patient plan, the biological optimization increased the dose to the radiosensitivity heterogeneous region to compensate for the heterogeneity-induced reduction in biological effectiveness of the H-ion beams. The reduction in biological effectiveness due to the heterogeneity was pronounced for low linear energy transfer (LET) beams but moderate for high-LET beams. The RBE-weighted dose in the cuboid target decreased by 7.6% for the H-ion beam, while it decreased by just 1.4% for the Ne-ion beam.Significance.Optimal treatment plans that consider intra-tumoural cellular radiosensitivity heterogeneity can be devised using the HMK model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kanematsu
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thwaites DI, Prokopovich DA, Garrett RF, Haworth A, Rosenfeld A, Ahern V. The rationale for a carbon ion radiation therapy facility in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71 Suppl 2:59-76. [PMID: 38061984 PMCID: PMC11011608 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Australia has taken a collaborative nationally networked approach to achieve particle therapy capability. This supports the under-construction proton therapy facility in Adelaide, other potential proton centres and an under-evaluation proposal for a hybrid carbon ion and proton centre in western Sydney. A wide-ranging overview is presented of the rationale for carbon ion radiation therapy, applying observations to the case for an Australian facility and to the clinical and research potential from such a national centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I. Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Institute of Medical ResearchSt James's Hospital and University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | | | - Richard F. Garrett
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology OrganisationLucas HeightsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of WollongongSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nachankar A, Schafasand M, Hug E, Martino G, Góra J, Carlino A, Stock M, Fossati P. Sacral-Nerve-Sparing Planning Strategy in Pelvic Sarcomas/Chordomas Treated with Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1284. [PMID: 38610962 PMCID: PMC11010899 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
To minimize radiation-induced lumbosacral neuropathy (RILSN), we employed sacral-nerve-sparing optimized carbon-ion therapy strategy (SNSo-CIRT) in treating 35 patients with pelvic sarcomas/chordomas. Plans were optimized using Local Effect Model-I (LEM-I), prescribed DRBE|LEM-I|D50% (median dose to HD-PTV) = 73.6 (70.4-76.8) Gy (RBE)/16 fractions. Sacral nerves were contoured between L5-S3 levels. DRBE|LEM-I to 5% of sacral nerves-to-spare (outside HD-CTV) (DRBE|LEM-I|D5%) were restricted to <69 Gy (RBE). The median follow-up was 25 months (range of 2-53). Three patients (9%) developed late RILSN (≥G3) after an average period of 8 months post-CIRT. The RILSN-free survival at 2 years was 91% (CI, 81-100). With SNSo-CIRT, DRBE|LEM-I|D5% for sacral nerves-to-spare = 66.9 ± 1.9 Gy (RBE), maintaining DRBE|LEM-I to 98% of HD-CTV (DRBE|LEM-I|D98%) = 70 ± 3.6 Gy (RBE). Two-year OS and LC were 100% and 93% (CI, 84-100), respectively. LETd and DRBE with modified-microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) were recomputed retrospectively. DRBE|LEM-I and DRBE|mMKM were similar, but DRBE-filtered-LETd was higher in sacral nerves-to-spare in patients with RILSN than those without. At DRBE|LEM-I cutoff = 64 Gy (RBE), 2-year RILSN-free survival was 100% in patients with <12% of sacral nerves-to-spare voxels receiving LETd > 55 keV/µm than 75% (CI, 54-100) in those with ≥12% of voxels (p < 0.05). DRBE-filtered-LETd holds promise for the SNSo-CIRT strategy but requires longer follow-up for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Nachankar
- ACMIT Gmbh, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (E.H.); (P.F.)
| | - Mansure Schafasand
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (G.M.); (J.G.); (A.C.); (M.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Eugen Hug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (E.H.); (P.F.)
| | - Giovanna Martino
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (G.M.); (J.G.); (A.C.); (M.S.)
| | - Joanna Góra
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (G.M.); (J.G.); (A.C.); (M.S.)
| | - Antonio Carlino
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (G.M.); (J.G.); (A.C.); (M.S.)
| | - Markus Stock
- Department of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (G.M.); (J.G.); (A.C.); (M.S.)
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Piero Fossati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (E.H.); (P.F.)
- Division Radiation Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Masuda T, Inaniwa T. Effects of cellular radioresponse on therapeutic helium-, carbon-, oxygen-, and neon-ion beams: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:045003. [PMID: 38232394 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1f87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Helium, oxygen, and neon ions in addition to carbon ions will be used for hypofractionated multi-ion therapy to maximize the therapeutic effectiveness of charged-particle therapy. To use new ions in cancer treatments based on the dose-fractionation protocols established in carbon-ion therapy, this study examined the cell-line-specific radioresponse to therapeutic helium-, oxygen-, and neon-ion beams within wide dose ranges.Approach. Response of cells to ions was described by the stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model. First, simulations were made for the irradiation of one-field spread-out Bragg peak beams in water with helium, carbon, oxygen, and neon ions to achieve uniform survival fractions at 37%, 10%, and 1% for human salivary gland tumor (HSG) cells, the reference cell line for the Japanese relative biological effectiveness weighted dose system, within the target region defined at depths from 90 to 150 mm. The HSG cells were then replaced by other cell lines with different radioresponses to evaluate differences in the biological dose distributions of each ion beam with respect to those of carbon-ion beams.Main results. For oxygen- and neon-ion beams, the biological dose distributions within the target region were almost equivalent to those of carbon-ion beams, differing by less than 5% in most cases. In contrast, for helium-ion beams, the biological dose distributions within the target region were largely different from those of carbon-ion beams, more than 10% in several cases.Significance.From the standpoint of tumor control evaluated by the clonogenic cell survival, this study suggests that the dose-fractionation protocols established in carbon-ion therapy could be reasonably applied to oxygen- and neon-ion beams while some modifications in dose prescription would be needed when the protocols are applied to helium-ion beams. This study bridges the gap between carbon-ion therapy and hypofractionated multi-ion therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takamitsu Masuda
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cartechini G, Missiaggia M, Scifoni E, La Tessa C, Cordoni FG. Integrating microdosimetric in vitroRBE models for particle therapy into TOPAS MC using the MicrOdosimetry-based modeliNg for RBE ASsessment (MONAS) tool. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:045005. [PMID: 38211313 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1d66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Objective.In this paper, we present MONAS (MicrOdosimetry-based modelliNg for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) ASsessment) toolkit. MONAS is a TOPAS Monte Carlo extension, that combines simulations of microdosimetric distributions with radiobiological microdosimetry-based models for predicting cell survival curves and dose-dependent RBE.Approach.MONAS expands TOPAS microdosimetric extension, by including novel specific energy scorers to calculate the single- and multi-event specific energy microdosimetric distributions at different micrometer scales. These spectra are used as physical input to three different formulations of themicrodosimetric kinetic model, and to thegeneralized stochastic microdosimetric model(GSM2), to predict dose-dependent cell survival fraction and RBE. MONAS predictions are then validated against experimental microdosimetric spectra andin vitrosurvival fraction data. To show the MONAS features, we present two different applications of the code: (i) the depth-RBE curve calculation from a passively scattered proton SOBP and monoenergetic12C-ion beam by using experimentally validated spectra as physical input, and (ii) the calculation of the 3D RBE distribution on a real head and neck patient geometry treated with protons.Main results.MONAS can estimate dose-dependent RBE and cell survival curves from experimentally validated microdosimetric spectra with four clinically relevant radiobiological models. From the radiobiological characterization of a proton SOBP and12C fields, we observe the well-known trend of increasing RBE values at the distal edge of the radiation field. The 3D RBE map calculated confirmed the trend observed in the analysis of the SOBP, with the highest RBE values found in the distal edge of the target.Significance.MONAS extension offers a comprehensive microdosimetry-based framework for assessing the biological effects of particle radiation in both research and clinical environments, pushing closer the experimental physics-based description to the biological damage assessment, contributing to bridging the gap between a microdosimetric description of the radiation field and its application in proton therapy treatment with variable RBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Cartechini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1550 NW 10th Avenue, 33126, Miami (FL), United States of America
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application (TIFPA), via Sommarive 15, I-38123, Trento, Italy
| | - Marta Missiaggia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1550 NW 10th Avenue, 33126, Miami (FL), United States of America
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application (TIFPA), via Sommarive 15, I-38123, Trento, Italy
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application (TIFPA), via Sommarive 15, I-38123, Trento, Italy
| | - Chiara La Tessa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1550 NW 10th Avenue, 33126, Miami (FL), United States of America
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application (TIFPA), via Sommarive 15, I-38123, Trento, Italy
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, via Sommarive 14, I-38123, Trento, Italy
| | - Francesco G Cordoni
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application (TIFPA), via Sommarive 15, I-38123, Trento, Italy
- Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, I-38123, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bonaccorsi SG, Tessonnier T, Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Harrabi S, Hörner-Rieber J, Haberer T, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Mairani A. Exploring Helium Ions' Potential for Post-Mastectomy Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:410. [PMID: 38254899 PMCID: PMC10814201 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy presents a promising modality for treating left-sided breast cancer due to its unique dose distribution. Helium ions provide increased conformality thanks to a reduced lateral scattering. Consequently, the potential clinical benefit of both techniques was explored. An explorative treatment planning study involving ten patients, previously treated with VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) for 50 Gy in 25 fractions for locally advanced, node-positive breast cancer, was carried out using proton pencil beam therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and helium therapy with a variable RBE described by the mMKM (modified microdosimetric kinetic model). Results indicated that target coverage was improved with particle therapy for both the clinical target volume and especially the internal mammary lymph nodes compared to VMAT. Median dose value analysis revealed that proton and helium plans provided lower dose on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), heart, lungs and right breast than VMAT. Notably, helium therapy exhibited improved ipsilateral lung sparing over protons. Employing NTCP models as available in the literature, helium therapy showed a lower probability of grade ≤ 2 radiation pneumonitis (22% for photons, 5% for protons and 2% for helium ions), while both proton and helium ions reduce the probability of major coronary events with respect to VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parisi A, Beltran CJ, Furutani KM. Variable RBE in proton radiotherapy: a comparative study with the predictive Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model and phenomenological models of cell survival. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:185020. [PMID: 38133518 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf43b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Objectives. (1) To examine to what extent the cell- and exposure- specific information neglected in the phenomenological proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models could influence the computed RBE in proton therapy. (2) To explore similarities and differences in the formalism and the results between the linear energy transfer (LET)-based phenomenological proton RBE models and the microdosimetry-based Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model (MCF MKM). (3) To investigate how the relationship between the RBE and the dose-mean proton LET is affected by the proton energy spectrum and the secondary fragments.Approach. We systematically compared six selected phenomenological proton RBE models with the MCF MKM in track-segment simulations, monoenergetic proton beams in a water phantom, and two spread-out Bragg peaks. A representative comparison within vitrodata for human glioblastoma cells (U87 cell line) is also included.Main results. Marked differences were observed between the results of the phenomenological proton RBE models, as reported in previous studies. The dispersion of these models' results was found to be comparable to the spread in the MCF MKM results obtained by varying the cell-specific parameters neglected in the phenomenological models. Furthermore, while single cell-specific correlation between RBE and the dose-mean proton LET seems reasonable above 2 keVμm-1, caution is necessary at lower LET values due to the relevant contribution of secondary fragments. The comparison within vitrodata demonstrates comparable agreement between the MCF MKM predictions and the results of the phenomenological models.Significance. The study highlights the importance of considering cell-specific characteristics and detailed radiation quality information for accurate RBE calculations in proton therapy. Furthermore, these results provide confidence in the use of the MCF MKM for clonogenic survival RBE calculations in proton therapy, offering a more mechanistic approach compared to phenomenological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Parisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Keith M Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Helm A, Fournier C. High-LET charged particles: radiobiology and application for new approaches in radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:1225-1241. [PMID: 37872399 PMCID: PMC10674019 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02158-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The number of patients treated with charged-particle radiotherapy as well as the number of treatment centers is increasing worldwide, particularly regarding protons. However, high-linear energy transfer (LET) particles, mainly carbon ions, are of special interest for application in radiotherapy, as their special physical features result in high precision and hence lower toxicity, and at the same time in increased efficiency in cell inactivation in the target region, i.e., the tumor. The radiobiology of high-LET particles differs with respect to DNA damage repair, cytogenetic damage, and cell death type, and their increased LET can tackle cells' resistance to hypoxia. Recent developments and perspectives, e.g., the return of high-LET particle therapy to the US with a center planned at Mayo clinics, the application of carbon ion radiotherapy using cost-reducing cyclotrons and the application of helium is foreseen to increase the interest in this type of radiotherapy. However, further preclinical research is needed to better understand the differential radiobiological mechanisms as opposed to photon radiotherapy, which will help to guide future clinical studies for optimal exploitation of high-LET particle therapy, in particular related to new concepts and innovative approaches. Herein, we summarize the basics and recent progress in high-LET particle radiobiology with a focus on carbon ions and discuss the implications of current knowledge for charged-particle radiotherapy. We emphasize the potential of high-LET particles with respect to immunogenicity and especially their combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Helm
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Claudia Fournier
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nachankar A, Schafasand M, Carlino A, Hug E, Stock M, Góra J, Fossati P. Planning Strategy to Optimize the Dose-Averaged LET Distribution in Large Pelvic Sarcomas/Chordomas Treated with Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4903. [PMID: 37835598 PMCID: PMC10571585 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
To improve outcomes in large sarcomas/chordomas treated with CIRT, there has been recent interest in LET optimization. We evaluated 22 pelvic sarcoma/chordoma patients treated with CIRT [large: HD-CTV ≥ 250 cm3 (n = 9), small: HD-CTV < 250 cm3 (n = 13)], DRBE|LEM-I = 73.6 (70.4-73.6) Gy (RBE)/16 fractions, using the local effect model-I (LEM-I) optimization and modified-microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) recomputation. We observed that to improve high-LETd distribution in large tumors, at least 27 cm3 (low-LETd region) of HD-CTV should receive LETd of ≥33 keV/µm (p < 0.05). Hence, LETd optimization using 'distal patching' was explored in a treatment planning setting (not implemented clinically yet). Distal-patching structures were created to stop beams 1-2 cm beyond the HD-PTV-midplane. These plans were reoptimized and DRBE|LEM-I, DRBE|mMKM, and LETd were recomputed. Distal patching increased (a) LETd50% in HD-CTV (from 38 ± 3.4 keV/µm to 47 ± 8.1 keV/µm), (b) LETdmin in low-LETd regions of the HD-CTV (from 32 ± 2.3 keV/µm to 36.2 ± 3.6 keV/µm), (c) the GTV fraction receiving LETd of ≥50 keV/µm, (from <10% to >50%) and (d) the high-LETd component in the central region of the GTV, without significant compromise in DRBE distribution. However, distal patching is sensitive to setup/range uncertainties, and efforts to ascertain robustness are underway, before routine clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Nachankar
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
- ACMIT Gmbh, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Mansure Schafasand
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Antonio Carlino
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
| | - Eugen Hug
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Joanna Góra
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria; (M.S.); (A.C.); (E.H.); (M.S.); (J.G.); (P.F.)
- Division Radiation Oncology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ekinci F, Acici K, Asuroglu T, Emek Soylu B. MC TRIM Algorithm in Mandibula Phantom in Helium Therapy. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2523. [PMID: 37761719 PMCID: PMC10530776 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy, one of the particle therapies developed and studied in the 1950s for cancer treatment, resulted in clinical trials starting at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 1975. While proton and carbon ion therapies have been implemented in research institutions and hospitals globally after the end of the trials, progress in comprehending the physical, biological, and clinical findings of helium ion beam therapy has been limited, particularly due to its limited accessibility. Ongoing efforts aim to establish programs that evaluate the use of helium ion beams for clinical and research purposes, especially in the treatment of sensitive clinical cases. Additionally, helium ions have superior physical properties to proton beams, such as lower lateral scattering and larger LET. Moreover, they exhibit similar physical characteristics to carbon, oxygen, and neon ions, which are all used in heavy ion therapy. However, they demonstrate a sharper lateral penumbra with a lower radiobiological absence of certainties and lack the degradation of variations in dose distributions caused by excessive fragmenting of heavier-ion beams, especially at greater depths of penetration. In this context, the status and the prospective advancements of helium ion therapy are examined by investigating ionization, recoil, and lateral scattering values using MC TRIM algorithms in mandible plate phantoms designed from both tissue and previously studied biomaterials, providing an overview for dental cancer treatment. An average difference of 1.9% in the Bragg peak positions and 0.211 mm in lateral scattering was observed in both phantoms. Therefore, it is suggested that the 4He ion beam can be used in the treatment of mandibular tumors, and experimental research is recommended using the proposed biomaterial mandible plate phantom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Ekinci
- Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey;
| | - Koray Acici
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey
| | - Tunc Asuroglu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland
| | - Busra Emek Soylu
- Computer Engineering Department, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lozano AI, Álvarez L, García-Abenza A, Guerra C, Kossoski F, Rosado J, Blanco F, Oller JC, Hasan M, Centurion M, Weber T, Slaughter DS, Mootheril DM, Dorn A, Kumar S, Limão-Vieira P, Colmenares R, García G. Electron Scattering from 1-Methyl-5-Nitroimidazole: Cross-Sections for Modeling Electron Transport through Potential Radiosensitizers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12182. [PMID: 37569557 PMCID: PMC10418670 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we present a complete set of electron scattering cross-sections from 1-Methyl-5-Nitroimidazole (1M5NI) molecules for impact energies ranging from 0.1 to 1000 eV. This information is relevant to evaluate the potential role of 1M5NI as a molecular radiosensitizers. The total electron scattering cross-sections (TCS) that we previously measured with a magnetically confined electron transmission apparatus were considered as the reference values for the present analysis. Elastic scattering cross-sections were calculated by means of two different schemes: The Schwinger multichannel (SMC) method for the lower energies (below 15 eV) and the independent atom model-based screening-corrected additivity rule with interferences (IAM-SCARI) for higher energies (above 15 eV). The latter was also applied to calculate the total ionization cross-sections, which were complemented with experimental values of the induced cationic fragmentation by electron impact. Double differential ionization cross-sections were measured with a reaction microscope multi-particle coincidence spectrometer. Using a momentum imaging spectrometer, direct measurements of the anion fragment yields and kinetic energies by the dissociative electron attachment are also presented. Cross-sections for the other inelastic channels were derived with a self-consistent procedure by sampling their values at a given energy to ensure that the sum of the cross-sections of all the scattering processes available at that energy coincides with the corresponding TCS. This cross-section data set is ready to be used for modelling electron-induced radiation damage at the molecular level to biologically relevant media containing 1M5NI as a potential radiosensitizer. Nonetheless, a proper evaluation of its radiosensitizing effects would require further radiobiological experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana I. Lozano
- Instituto de Física Fundamental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC, Serrano 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain or (A.I.L.); (L.Á.); (A.G.-A.); (C.G.)
- Laboratório de Colisões Atómicas e Moleculares, CEFITEC, Departamento de Física, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal (P.L.-V.)
| | - Lidia Álvarez
- Instituto de Física Fundamental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC, Serrano 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain or (A.I.L.); (L.Á.); (A.G.-A.); (C.G.)
| | - Adrián García-Abenza
- Instituto de Física Fundamental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC, Serrano 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain or (A.I.L.); (L.Á.); (A.G.-A.); (C.G.)
| | - Carlos Guerra
- Instituto de Física Fundamental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC, Serrano 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain or (A.I.L.); (L.Á.); (A.G.-A.); (C.G.)
| | - Fábris Kossoski
- Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, France;
| | - Jaime Rosado
- Departamento de Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electrónica e IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (J.R.); (F.B.)
| | - Francisco Blanco
- Departamento de Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electrónica e IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (J.R.); (F.B.)
| | - Juan Carlos Oller
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Avenida Complutense 22, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Mahmudul Hasan
- Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; (M.H.); (T.W.); (D.S.S.)
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
| | - Martin Centurion
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
| | - Thorsten Weber
- Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; (M.H.); (T.W.); (D.S.S.)
| | - Daniel S. Slaughter
- Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; (M.H.); (T.W.); (D.S.S.)
| | | | - Alexander Dorn
- Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; (D.M.M.)
| | - Sarvesh Kumar
- Laboratório de Colisões Atómicas e Moleculares, CEFITEC, Departamento de Física, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal (P.L.-V.)
- Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; (M.H.); (T.W.); (D.S.S.)
| | - Paulo Limão-Vieira
- Laboratório de Colisões Atómicas e Moleculares, CEFITEC, Departamento de Física, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal (P.L.-V.)
| | - Rafael Colmenares
- Servicio de Radiofísica, IRYCIS-Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Viejo Km. 9.100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Gustavo García
- Instituto de Física Fundamental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC, Serrano 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain or (A.I.L.); (L.Á.); (A.G.-A.); (C.G.)
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bertolet A, Chamseddine I, Paganetti H, Schuemann J. The complexity of DNA damage by radiation follows a Gamma distribution: insights from the Microdosimetric Gamma Model. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1196502. [PMID: 37397382 PMCID: PMC10313124 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1196502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction DNA damage is the main predictor of response to radiation therapy for cancer. Its Q8 quantification and characterization are paramount for treatment optimization, particularly in advanced modalities such as proton and alpha-targeted therapy. Methods We present a novel approach called the Microdosimetric Gamma Model (MGM) to address this important issue. The MGM uses the theory of microdosimetry, specifically the mean energy imparted to small sites, as a predictor of DNA damage properties. MGM provides the number of DNA damage sites and their complexity, which were determined using Monte Carlo simulations with the TOPAS-nBio toolkit for monoenergetic protons and alpha particles. Complexity was used together with a illustrative and simplistic repair model to depict the differences between high and low LET radiations. Results DNA damage complexity distributions were were found to follow a Gamma distribution for all monoenergetic particles studied. The MGM functions allowed to predict number of DNA damage sites and their complexity for particles not simulated with microdosimetric measurements (yF) in the range of those studied. Discussion Compared to current methods, MGM allows for the characterization of DNA damage induced by beams composed of multi-energy components distributed over any time configuration and spatial distribution. The output can be plugged into ad hoc repair models that can predict cell killing, protein recruitment at repair sites, chromosome aberrations, and other biological effects, as opposed to current models solely focusing on cell survival. These features are particularly important in targeted alpha-therapy, for which biological effects remain largely uncertain. The MGM provides a flexible framework to study the energy, time, and spatial aspects of ionizing radiation and offers an excellent tool for studying and optimizing the biological effects of these radiotherapy modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Bertolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Camazzola G, Boscolo D, Scifoni E, Dorn A, Durante M, Krämer M, Abram V, Fuss MC. TRAX-CHEMxt: Towards the Homogeneous Chemical Stage of Radiation Damage. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24119398. [PMID: 37298351 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The indirect effect of radiation plays an important role in radio-induced biological damages. Monte Carlo codes have been widely used in recent years to study the chemical evolution of particle tracks. However, due to the large computational efforts required, their applicability is typically limited to simulations in pure water targets and to temporal scales up to the µs. In this work, a new extension of TRAX-CHEM is presented, namely TRAX-CHEMxt, able to predict the chemical yields at longer times, with the capability of exploring the homogeneous biochemical stage. Based on the species coordinates produced around one track, the set of reaction-diffusion equations is solved numerically with a computationally light approach based on concentration distributions. In the overlapping time scale (500 ns-1 µs), a very good agreement to standard TRAX-CHEM is found, with deviations below 6% for different beam qualities and oxygenations. Moreover, an improvement in the computational speed by more than three orders of magnitude is achieved. The results of this work are also compared with those from another Monte Carlo-based algorithm and a fully homogeneous code (Kinetiscope). TRAX-CHEMxt will allow for studying the variation in chemical endpoints at longer timescales with the introduction, as the next step, of biomolecules, for more realistic assessments of biological response under different radiation and environmental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmarco Camazzola
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Quantum Dynamics and Control Division, Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daria Boscolo
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Emanuele Scifoni
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), 38123 Povo, Italy
| | - Alexander Dorn
- Quantum Dynamics and Control Division, Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Michael Krämer
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Valentino Abram
- Department of Mathematics, University of Trento, 38123 Povo, Italy
| | - Martina C Fuss
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schnelzauer L, Valentin S, Traykov E, Arbor N, Finck C, Vanstalle M. Short-lived radioactive 8Li and 8He ions for hadrontherapy: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36731132 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb88b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose.Although charged particle therapy (CPT) for cancer treatment has grown these past years, the use of protons and carbon ions for therapy remains debated compared to x-ray therapy. While a biological advantage of protons is not clearly demonstrated, therapy using carbon ions is often pointed out for its high cost. Furthermore, the nuclear interactions undergone by carbons inside the patient are responsible for an additional dose delivered after the Bragg peak, which deteriorates the ballistic advantage of CPT. Therefore, a renewed interest for lighter ions with higher biological efficiency than protons was recently observed. In this context, helium and lithium ions represent a good compromise between protons and carbons, as they exhibit a higher linear energy transfer (LET) than protons in the Bragg peak and can be accelerated by cyclotrons. The possibility of accelerating radioactive8Li, decaying in 2α-particles, and8He, decaying in8Li byβ-decay, is particularly interesting.Methods. This work aims to assess the interest of the use of8Li and8He ions for therapy by Monte Carlo simulations carried out withGeant4.Results. It was calculated that the8Li and8He decay results in an increase of the LET of almost a factor 2 in the Bragg peak compared to stable7Li and4He. This results also in a higher dose deposited in the Bragg peak without an increase of the dose in the plateau region. It was also shown that both8He and8Li can have a potential interest for prompt-gamma monitoring techniques. Finally, the feasibility of accelerating facilities delivering8Li and8He was also discussed.Conclusion. In this study, we demonstrate that both8Li and8He have interesting properties for therapy. Indeed, simulations predict that8Li and8He are a good compromise between proton and12C, both in terms of LET and dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Schnelzauer
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7871, F-67000 STRASBOURG, France
| | - S Valentin
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7871, F-67000 STRASBOURG, France
| | - E Traykov
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7871, F-67000 STRASBOURG, France
| | - N Arbor
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7871, F-67000 STRASBOURG, France
| | - Ch Finck
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7871, F-67000 STRASBOURG, France
| | - M Vanstalle
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7871, F-67000 STRASBOURG, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Helm A, Totis C, Durante M, Fournier C. Are charged particles a good match for combination with immunotherapy? Current knowledge and perspectives. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2023; 376:1-36. [PMID: 36997266 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Charged particle radiotherapy, mainly using protons and carbon ions, provides physical characteristics allowing for a volume conformal irradiation and a reduction of the integral dose to normal tissue. Carbon ion therapy additionally features an increased biological effectiveness resulting in peculiar molecular effects. Immunotherapy, mostly performed with immune checkpoint inhibitors, is nowadays considered a pillar in cancer therapy. Based on the advantageous features of charged particle radiotherapy, we review pre-clinical evidence revealing a strong potential of its combination with immunotherapy. We argue that the combination therapy deserves further investigation with the aim of translation in clinics, where a few studies have been set up already.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Helm
- Biophysics Department, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - C Totis
- Biophysics Department, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - M Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany.
| | - C Fournier
- Biophysics Department, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wickert R, Tessonnier T, Deng M, Adeberg S, Seidensaal K, Hoeltgen L, Debus J, Herfarth K, Harrabi SB. Radiotherapy with Helium Ions Has the Potential to Improve Both Endocrine and Neurocognitive Outcome in Pediatric Patients with Ependymoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235865. [PMID: 36497348 PMCID: PMC9736041 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Ependymomas are the third most-frequent pediatric brain tumors. To prevent local recurrence, the resection site should be irradiated. Compared to photon radiation treatment, proton therapy often achieves even better results regarding target coverage and organ-sparing. Due to their physical properties, helium ions could further reduce side effects, providing better protection of healthy tissue despite similar target coverage. In our in silico study, 15 pediatric ependymoma patients were considered. All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapeutic treatment with active-scanned protons at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Both helium ion and highly conformal IMRT plans were calculated to evaluate the potential dosimetric advantage of ion beam therapy compared to the current state-of-the-art photon-based treatments. To estimate the potential clinical benefit of helium ions, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated. Target coverage was comparable in all three modalities. As expected, the integral dose absorbed by healthy brain tissue could be significantly reduced with protons by up to -48% vs. IMRT. Even compared to actively scanned protons, relative dose reductions for critical neuronal structures of up to another -39% were achieved when using helium ions. The dose distribution of helium ions is significantly superior when compared to proton therapy and IMRT due to the improved sparing of OAR. In fact, previous studies could clearly demonstrate that the dosimetric advantage of protons translates into a measurable clinical benefit for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Given the dose-response relationship of critical organs at risk combined with NTCP calculation, the results of our study provide a strong rationale that the use of helium ions has the potential to even further reduce the risk for treatment related sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Wickert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi B. Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vozenin MC, Bourhis J, Durante M. Towards clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:791-803. [DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00697-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
31
|
Vedelago J, Karger CP, Jäkel O. A review on reference dosimetry in radiation therapy with proton and light ion beams: status and impact of new developments. RADIAT MEAS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2022.106844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
32
|
Mein S, Kopp B, Tessonnier T, Liermann J, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Haberer T, Mairani A. Spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy: A proof of concept using single and multi-ion strategies with helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions. Med Phys 2022; 49:6082-6097. [PMID: 35717613 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present particle arc therapy treatments using single and multi-ion therapy optimization strategies with helium (4 He), carbon (12 C), oxygen (16 O) and neon (20 Ne) ion beams. METHODS AND MATERIALS An optimization procedure and workflow were devised for spot-scanning hadron arc therapy (SHArc) treatment planning in the PRECISE (PaRticle thErapy using single and Combined Ion optimization StratEgies) treatment planning system (TPS). Physical and biological beam models were developed for helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions via FLUKA MC simulation. SHArc treatments were optimized using both single ion (12 C, 16 O, or 20 Ne) and multi-ion therapy (16 O+4 He or 20 Ne+4 He) applying variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) modeling using a modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) with (α/β)x values of 2Gy, 5Gy and 3.1Gy respectively, for glioblastoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma patient cases. Dose, effective dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE were computed with the GPU-accelerated dose engine FRoG and dosimetric/biophysical attributes were evaluated in the context of conventional particle and photon-based therapies (e.g., volumetric modulated arc therapy [VMAT]). RESULTS All SHArc plans met the target optimization goals (3GyRBE) and demonstrated increased target conformity and substantially lower low-dose bath to surrounding normal tissues than VMAT. SHArc plans using a single ion species (12 C, 16 O, or 20 Ne) exhibited favorable LET distributions with the highest-LET components centralized in the target volume, with values ranging from ∼80-170keV/μm, ∼130-220keV/μm and ∼180-350keV/μm, for 12 C, 16 O, or 20 Ne, respectively, exceeding mean target LET of conventional particle therapy (12 C:∼60, 16 O:∼78 20 Ne:∼100 keV/μm). Multi-ion therapy with SHArc delivery (SHArcMIT ) provided a similar level of target LET enhancement as SHArc compared to conventional planning, however, with additional benefits of homogenous physical dose and RBE distributions. CONCLUSION Here, we demonstrate that arc delivery of light and heavy ion beams, using either a single ion species (12 C, 16 O, or 20 Ne) or combining two ions in a single fraction (16 O+4 He or 20 Ne+4 He), affords enhanced physical and biological distributions (e.g., LET) compared with conventional delivery with photons or particle beams. SHArc marks the first single and multi-ion arc therapy treatment optimization approach using light and heavy ions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.,National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Biological Dose Optimization for Particle Arc Therapy using Helium and Carbon Ions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:334-348. [PMID: 35490991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present biological dose optimization for particle arc therapy using helium and carbon ions. METHODS Treatment plan planning and optimization procedures were developed for spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) delivery using the RayStation TPS and a GPU-accelerated dose engine (†TPS-XXX). The SHArc optimization algorithm is applicable for charged particle beams and determines angle-dependencies for spot/energy selection with three main initiatives: i) achieve standard clinical optimization goals and constraints for target and OARs, ii) target dose robustness and iii) increasing LET in the target volume. Three patient cases previously treated at the †INSTITUTION-XXX were selected for evaluation of conventional versus arc delivery for the two clinical particle beams (helium [4He] and carbon [12C] ions): glioblastoma, prostate-adenocarcinoma and skull-base chordoma. Biological dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) distributions for SHArc were evaluated against conventional planning techniques (VMAT and IMPT2F) applying the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) for considering bio-effect with (α/β)x=2Gy. Clinical viability and deliverability were assessed via evaluation of plan quality, robustness and irradiation time. RESULTS For all investigated patient cases, SHArc treatment optimizations met planning goals and constraints for target coverage and OARs, exhibiting acceptable target coverage and reduced normal tissue volumes with effective dose >10GyRBE compared to conventional 2F planning. For carbon ions, LETd was increased in the target volume from ∼40-60keV/µm to ∼80-140keV/µm for SHArc compared to conventional treatments. Favorable LETd distributions were possible with the SHArc approach, with maximum LETd in CTV/GTV and potential reductions of high-LET regions in normal tissues and OARs. Compared to VMAT, SHArc affords substantial reductions in normal tissue dose (40-70%). CONCLUSION SHArc therapy offers potential treatment benefits such as increased normal tissue sparing from higher doses >10GyRBE, enhanced target LETd, and potential reduction in high-LET components in OARs. Findings justify further development of robust SHArc treatment planning towards potential clinical translation.
Collapse
|