Use of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin 19, and maspin in the detection of tumor cells in leukapheresis products from patients with breast cancer: comparison with immunocytochemistry

Assessment of Cytokeratin-19 Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood of Breast Cancer Patients and Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Detection of cytokeratin-19 (CK19) expression as an epithelial-specific marker in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of breast cancer patients can be important for diagnostic purposes. Comparison of CK19 expression in breast cancer cell lines can indicate that expression of this marker is different in various breast cancer cell lines based on their category. Thirty-five breast cancer patients were evaluated for detection of CK19 mRNA in their peripheral blood using CK19-specific primers and a nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique. CK19 expression levels were detected in MCF7, T47D, SK-BR-3, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines by semiquantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analyses. Statistical analysis of our data indicates that there is no significant difference between CK19 expression and histopathological parameters and some molecular markers, including Ki-67, HER-2, and P53, but there are statistically significant correlations between estrogen receptor (P = 0.040) and progesterone receptor (P = 0.046) with CK19 expression. CK19 expression was detected in MCF7, T47D, and SK-BR-3 cell lines but not in MDA-MB-231 cell line. More studies are needed to determine the relationship between this marker and other markers in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. On the other hand, the study of different markers using breast cancer cell lines as experimental models of breast cancer could have an impact on improving the health outcomes of patients with breast cancer.

Detection and prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in nonmetastatic breast cancer patients

SUMMARY Distant metastasis remains the primary cause of death for breast cancer patients. Metastasis is a complex, multistep process wherein a subset of cells from a heterogeneous tumor acquire the ability to disseminate from the primary tumor and invade the blood and/or lymph nodes. Although tumor size, tumor characteristics and axillary lymph node status are the most common parameters utilized to predict disease recurrence in nonmetastatic patients, a significant number of lymph node-negative patients with localized disease will develop distant metastases despite successful primary treatment. These data suggest that tumor cell dissemination can occur early in disease progression, sometimes bypassing the lymphatic system. Occult micrometastases, or circulating tumor cells in the blood, are rare tumor cells that remain undetected by standard histopathogical and high-resolution imaging methodologies. This review focuses on current methodologies used to detect circulating tumor cells and their prognostic significance in nonmetastatic breast cancer patients.

Role of maspin in cancer

Maspin (mammary serine protease inhibitor), is a member of the serine protease inhibitor/non-inhibitor superfamily. Its expression is down-regulated in breast, prostate, gastric and melanoma cancers but over-expressed in pancreatic, gallbladder, colorectal, and thyroid cancers suggesting that maspin may play different activities in different cell types. However, maspin expression seems to be correlated with better prognosis in prostate, bladder, lung, gastric, colorectal, head and neck, thyroid and melanoma cancer. In breast and ovarian cancer maspin significance is associated with its subcellular localization: nucleus maspin expression correlates with a good prognosis, whilst in pancreatic cancer it predicts a poor prognosis. Since tumor metastasis requires the detachment and invasion of tumor cells through the basement membrane and stroma, a selectively increased adhesion by the presence of maspin may contribute to the inhibition of tumor metastasis. Furthermore the different position of maspin inside the cell or its epigenetic modifications may explain the different behavior of the expression of maspin between tumors. The expression of maspin might be useful as a prognostic and possibly predictive factor for patients with particular types of cancer and data can guide physicians in selecting therapy. Its expression in circulating tumor cells especially in breast cancer, could be also useful in clinical practice along with other factors, such as age, comorbidities, blood examinations in order to select the best therapy to be carried out. Focusing on the malignancies in which maspin showed a positive prognostic value, therapeutic approaches studied so far aimed to re-activate a dormant tumor suppressor gene by designed transcription factors, to hit the system that inhibits the expression of maspin, to identify natural substances that can determine the activation and the expression of maspin or possible “molecules binds” to introduce maspin in cancer cell and gene therapy capable of up-regulating the maspin in an attempt to reduce primarily the risk of metastasis.

Further studies in these directions are necessary to better define the therapeutic implication of maspin.

Markers of circulating breast cancer cells

The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) aids in diagnosis of disease, prognosis, disease recurrence, and therapeutic response. The molecular aspects of metastasis are reviewed including its relevance in the identification and characterization of putative markers that may be useful in the detection thereof. Also discussed are methods for CTC enrichment using molecular strategies. The clinical application of CTC in the metastatic disease process is also summarized.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs): detection methods and their clinical relevance in breast cancer

The enumeration of circulating tumor cells has long been regarded as an attractive diagnostic tool, as circulating tumor cells are thought to reflect aggressiveness of the tumor and may assist in therapeutic decisions in patients with solid malignancies. However, implementation of this assay into clinical routine has been cumbersome, as a validated test was not available until recently. Circulating tumor cells are rare events which can be detected specifically only by using a combination of surface and intracellular markers, and only recently a number of technical advances have made their reliable detection possible. Most of these new techniques rely on a combination of an enrichment and a detection step. This review addresses the assays that have been described so far in the literature, including the enrichment and detection steps and the markers used in these assays. We have focused on breast cancer as most clinical studies on CTC detection so far have been done in these patients.

DETECTION OF DISSEMINATED TUMOR CELLS IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD

Metastases are the major cause of cancer-related deaths in patients with solid epithelial malignancies, such as breast, colorectal and prostate carcinomas. Hematogenous spreading of tumor cells from a primary tumor can be considered as a crucial step in the metastasis cascade leading eventually to the formation of clinically manifest metastases. Consequently, as shown in recent studies, the detection of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood might be of clinical relevance with respect to individual patient prognosis and staging or monitoring of therapy. However, the rarity of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood renders the application of sensitive techniques mandatory for their detection. The emergence of highly sophisticated reverse transciptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, combining a preanalytical enrichment step with the assessment of multiple molecular tumor markers expressed in disseminated tumor cells, provides a powerful tool in detecting disseminated tumor cells with high sensitivity and specificity. This review will discuss currently used tumor markers as well as experimental means to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR assays to detect disseminated tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, and their clinical relevance assessed in recent studies.

Epithelial molecular markers in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer

Despite the modest improvements in patient survival from colorectal cancer in the last few decades, the overall five-year survival rate remains at 40 to 45 percent. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer; however, nearly one-half of all patients who undergo a potentially curative resection will relapse because of undetected micrometastasis. The fact that the overall survival rate remains poor strongly suggests that the dissemination of these cells occurs early in the disease process and emphasizes the need for finding feasible diagnostic methods with sufficient sensitivity and specificity. The most commonly used technique for the detection of nucleic acid material of disseminated tumor cells is the polymerase chain reaction. We critically review the literature on DNA and messenger ribonucleic acid molecular markers that have been used for the detection of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer and other solid tumors as appropriate for comparison. The cytokeratins, particularly cytokeratin 19 and cytokeratin 20, are the most investigated prognostic markers, but even for these questions remain about their clinical value, and hence most recent studies are utilizing a combination of factors. There is an urgent need for standardized isolation and analysis techniques to be adopted thus allowing large-scale, appropriately controlled, multicenter trials to be undertaken on the most promising candidate markers.

Combination of multiple mRNA markers (PTTG1, Survivin, UbcH10 and TK1) in the diagnosis of Taiwanese patients with breast cancer by membrane array

OBJECTIVE

Early detection is a prerequisite to the effective reduction of morbidity and mortality from breast cancer. The present study intended to employ a high-throughput membrane array to detect a panel of mRNA markers expressed by circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood of female patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Peripheral blood was sampled from 92 breast cancer patients and 100 normal persons. CTCs were detected by using a membrane array technique. The markers used included the pituitary tumor transforming gene 1, survivin, UbcH10 and thymidine kinase 1.

RESULTS

The results showed that the membrane array could positively detect 5 cancer cells per 1 ml of peripheral blood in breast cancer cell dilution experiments. For the panel of 4 mRNA markers, sensitivity and specificity were elevated up to 86 and 88%, respectively. Furthermore, it was found that the patients' clinicopathological characteristics tumor size (p = 0.006), histologic grade (p = 0.012), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001) and TNM stage (p = 0.006) significantly correlated with the positive detection rate of the multimarker panel.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrated that our multimarker membrane array method could detect CTCs in the circulation of breast cancer patients with considerably high sensitivity and specificity.

An evaluation of molecular markers for improved detection of breast cancer metastases in sentinel nodes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In patients with breast cancer (BC), the sentinel node (SN) is the first node in the axillary basin that receives the primary lymphatic flow and can be used to accurately assess the axillary nodal status without removal of the axillary contents. Currently, histology and/or immunohistochemistry are the routine methods of SN analysis. The primary objective of this study was to develop a reproducible reverse transcription (RT) PCR assay, with emphasis on achieving high specificity for accurate detection of BC micrometastases in the SN. To correct for the heterogeneity of BC cells, a multimarker approach was followed, with the further aim of improving the detection rate of the assay.

METHODS

In total, 73 markers were evaluated, of which 7 were breast epithelial markers and 66 were either cancer testis or tumour associated antigens. Twelve BC cell lines and 30 SNs (from 30 patients) were analysed using RT-PCR to determine the in vitro and in vivo detection rates for each of the markers. In addition, 20 axillary nodes obtained from a patient with brain death were used as controls to optimise the PCR cycle numbers for all the markers.

RESULTS

Of the 30 SNs, 37% (11/30) were positive on haematoxylin and eosin analysis. Extensive immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of the haematoxylin and eosin negative nodes confirmed the presence of very small numbers of BC cells in an additional 40% (12/30) of SNs. Molecular analysis with the hMAM-A alone identified metastases in 70% (21/30) of SNs. Using MAGE-A3 in combination with hMAM-A identified metastases in 90% (27/30) of patients. Seven SNs (23%) were negative for micrometastases (with haematoxylin and eosin and IHC) but RT-PCR positive for either hMAM-A or MAGE-A3.

CONCLUSIONS

As IHC analysis resulted in a 77% detection rate compared with 37% for haematoxylin and eosin analysis, we consider that IHC is essential in order not to miss SN micrometastases. Molecular analysis with hMAM-A and MAGE-A3 allows detection of BC micrometastases with a 90% detection rate. However, the clinical value of histologically negative but RT-PCR positive SNs can only be determined with long term follow up.

RT-PCR determination of maspin and mammaglobin B in peripheral blood of healthy donors and breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of two markers, maspin and mammaglobin B, singly or in combination, to detect breast cancer. To define better the potential and limits of the two markers for diagnostic purposes, blood positivity was analyzed in relation to clinical, pathological and biological tumor characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The markers were determined in peripheral blood (PB) samples from 27 healthy donors and 140 previously untreated patients using nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

Positivity for maspin in blood samples was observed in 24% of patients with an 89% specificity. For mammaglobin B, positivity was observed in 7% of patients and never in healthy donors. The presence of maspin was correlated with cell proliferation of the primary tumor (P = 0.015), whereas mammaglobin B positivity correlated with pathological stage (P = 0.013). The presence of either marker was significantly related to nodal status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the two markers in association could represent a potentially useful non-invasive tool to detect breast cancer. The validation of these markers as indicators of high risk of relapse is ongoing in a series of patients with an adequate follow-up.

Standardized quantification of circulating peripheral tumor cells from lung and breast cancer

Detection and quantitation of circulating tumor cells from solid epithelial tumors could become a valuable tool for therapy monitoring if the procedure can be standardized. In the present work we assessed the influence of pre-analytical handling, storage and white blood cell isolation on analysis of a population of spiked tumor cell-line cells and intrinsically present epithelial cells in the peripheral blood of breast and lung cancer patients and the sensitivity of their detection. Sucrose density separation did not enrich epithelial cells, and even depleted them, leading to a gross underestimation of their numbers (3/13 positive, between 2.9 and 50 cells/mL) in comparison to red blood cell lysis (13/13 positive, between 77,200 and 800 cells/mL). Short-term storage of whole blood samples for up to 7 days had little influence on the number of epithelial cells recovered. The effectiveness of magnetic bead enrichment was dependent on the number of relevant cells and the volume used for enrichment. Red blood cell lysis and fluorochrome-labeled antibody staining in a no-wash procedure with subsequent laser scanning cytometry allowed the detection of circulating epithelial cells in 92% of breast and lung cancer patients. Two examples of how this method can be applied for the longitudinal analysis in individual patients are shown, with an increase in numbers preceding relapse and a decrease paralleling tumor reduction. The proposed simple and easy method allows close monitoring, which may help in real-time analysis of the response of solid tumors, especially their systemic component, to therapy and hopefully will contribute to more individually tailored therapy.

Effect of different cytokines on mammaglobin and maspin gene expression in normal leukocytes: possible relevance to the assays for the detection of micrometastatic breast cancer

In cancer patients, the ability to detect disseminated tumour cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow could improve prognosis and consent both early detection of metastatic disease and monitoring of the efficacy of systemic therapy. These objectives remain elusive mainly due to the lack of specific genetic markers for solid tumours. The use of surrogate tissue-specific markers can reduce the specificity of the assays and give rise to a clinically unacceptable false-positive rate. Mammaglobin (MAM) and maspin are two putative breast tissue-specific markers frequently used for detection of occult tumour cells in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymph nodes of breast cancer patients. In this study, it was evaluated whether MAM and maspin gene expression may be induced in the normal blood and bone marrow cells exposed to a panel of cytokines, including chemotactic factors (C5a, interleukin (IL)-8), LPS, proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β) and growth factors (IL-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). The experimental data show that all cytokines included in the panel, except for IL-8, were able to induce maspin expression; on the contrary, MAM gene was never induced. These results suggest that MAM is more specific than maspin and that the possible interference of cytokines should be taken into account in interpreting molecular assays for detection of isolated tumour cells.

Persistence of bone marrow micrometastases in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: Results at 4 years

We have previously developed a quantitative PCR (QPCR) technique for the detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) transcripts in blood and bone marrow and compared this to immunocytochemistry (ICC). Together, both have shown promise for monitoring therapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and value of these assays for minimal residual disease (MRD) in monitoring efficacy of adjuvant therapy following surgery for primary breast cancer. Bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood samples were taken at the time of surgery from patients with primary breast cancer and no evidence of metastases on conventional scans. These were tested for the presence of CK19 mRNA transcripts and cytokeratin positive cells. Follow-up bone marrow aspirates were taken at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Prior to surgery, 51% of patients displayed evidence of disseminated cancer cells in the bone marrow by either or both QPCR and ICC. Of 91 patients who had repeat samples assayed, 87% and 65% had positive results at some time using QPCR and ICC, respectively. All patients received adjuvant systemic therapy and in 44 cases where there was a positive result in either the pretreatment or 3-month aspirate, 32/44 (73%) showed a fall in CK19:ABL ratio (QPCR) and 15/24 (63%) showed a reduction in the number of cytokeratin-positive cells (ICC) during follow-up. These results indicate that MRD persists despite adjuvant therapy in a majority of patients with primary breast cancer up to 4 years following surgery.

The detection of circulating breast cancer cells in blood

At present, sampling of the lymph nodes or bone marrow for the detection of regions of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer can only be undertaken at the time of initial diagnosis and surgery. However, the sampling of these tissues and the methods used are inaccurate, time consuming, and cannot be used for easy routine screening to determine disease recurrence and response to treatment. Because of the problems encountered with current methods and tissues sampled at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, this review discusses the urgent requirement for and potential development of a quick, simple, and accurate diagnostic test utilising the haematogenous system, a source of circulating tumour cells in patients with breast cancer, and highly sensitive molecular biological techniques, such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. In addition, this review also highlights potential problems that may be encountered and should be avoided when devising such a test.

Molecular detection of micrometastatic breast cancer in histopathology-negative axillary lymph nodes correlates with traditional predictors of prognosis: an interim analysis of a prospective multi-institutional cohort study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to establish the clinical relevance of micrometastatic disease detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in axillary lymph nodes (ALN) of breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND

The presence of ALN metastases remains one of the most valuable prognostic indicators in women with breast cancer. However, the clinical relevance of molecular detection of micrometastatic breast cancer in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) and nonsentinel ALN has not been established.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty-nine patients with T1-T3 primary breast cancers were analyzed in a prospective, multi-institutional cohort study. ALN were analyzed by standard histopathology (H&E staining) and by multimarker, real-time RT-PCR analysis (mam, mamB, muc1, CEA, PSE, CK19, and PIP) designed to detect breast cancer micrometastases.

RESULTS

A positive marker signal was observed in 126 (87%) of 145 subjects with pathology-positive ALN, and in 112 (33%) of 344 subjects with pathology-negative ALN. In subjects with pathology-negative ALN, a positive marker signal was significantly associated with traditional indicators of prognosis, such as histologic grade (P = 0.0255) and St. Gallen risk category (P = 0.022). Mammaglobin was the most informative marker in the panel.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report to show that overexpression of breast cancer-associated genes in breast cancer subjects with pathology-negative ALN correlates with traditional indicators of disease prognosis. These interim results provide strong evidence that molecular markers could serve as valid surrogates for the detection of occult micrometastases in ALN. Correlation of real-time RT-PCR analyses with disease-free survival in this patient cohort will help to define the clinical relevance of micrometastatic disease in this patient population.

The molecular detection of micrometastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The rapid evolution of molecular technology and novel markers provides the opportunity to establish a more effective means to detect micrometastatic breast cancer. Given the controversies concerning application and clinical relevance, this review critically evaluates the current status of these molecular staging technologies.

DATA SOURCES

Breast cancer literature addressing (1). molecular detection methodologies (immunohistochemistry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and microarray analysis); (2). specific tissue applications such as lymph nodes, bone marrow aspirate, and peripheral blood; (3). expert commentary concerning the clinical applications and pitfalls of these technologies; and (4). recent data from our molecular diagnostics laboratory.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular detection technologies such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and microarray analyses are being developed that will likely have future application as cancer diagnostics. Further work is needed to establish assays that are validated by prospective clinical studies. Early identification of clinically relevant disease could lead to new treatment or staging approaches for breast cancer.

Molecular detection of disseminated tumor cells in the peripheral blood in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

PURPOSE

In this study, 62 preoperative peripheral blood samples from patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas, 12 healthy volunteers, and ten patients with inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases were analyzed for the determination of CEA, CK19, and CK20 mRNA expression in peripheral blood, and its clinical significance was evaluated.

METHODS

Nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (nested RT-PCR) was used to analyze CEA, CK19, and CK20 mRNA expression in peripheral blood. Fresh tumor tissues from patients with colorectal cancer (n=15) were used as a positive control.

RESULTS

Among 62 blood samples from patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the expression of CEA, CK19, and CK20 mRNA was 51.6% (32/62), 35.5% (22/62), and 48.4% (30/62), respectively. 74.2% (46/62) were positive for at least one marker. Fifteen tumor tissues were all positive for CEA, CK19, and CK20 mRNA. Only one blood sample from patients with no gastrointestinal carcinoma was positive for CEA mRNA.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the molecular detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma was significantly correlated with its malignant biological properties, and may be helpful in the selection of clinical treatment and judgment of prognosis.

Maspin and mammaglobin genes are specific markers for RT-PCR detection of minimal residual disease in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the specificity of some reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for the detection of residual tumor cells in breast cancer patients. The following markers have been analysed: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratins (CK19 and CK20), polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC-1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), maspin, and mammaglobin. RT-PCR was employed to detect breast cancer cells in peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and stem cell leukoaphereses (PBPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the specificity of our RT-PCR assays on a panel of breast cancer specimens (n = 30), on PBPC in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (n = 38), on BM (n = 7) and PB (n = 5) samples obtained from patients with breast cancer. Marrow cells, PB, and PBPC from normal subjects or hematological tumor patients were tested as negative controls.

RESULTS

Only maspin and mammaglobin met the criteria of sensitivity and specificity required for the detection of residual disease; they were expressed in 80% and 97% of breast cancer specimens, respectively, and not expressed in normal controls. CK19, CK20. EGFR, MUC-1, and CEA were sometimes expressed in normal blood cells and/or hematological tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the notion that maspin and mammaglobin are useful markers for RT-PCR detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in breast cancer patients, and that perspective clinical studies are needed to determine wether RT-PCR assays will be useful in assessing prognosis, tailoring therapy, or developing new strategies for ex vivo purging.

Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of the maspin gene in the detection of bone marrow breast carcinoma cell contamination

BACKGROUND

Maspin is a molecular marker used for the detection of contaminating breast carcinoma (BC) cells in peripheral blood and lymph nodes. However, its specificity has been questioned recently. The objective of this study was to verify the specificity of this marker and to determine the incidence of positive bone marrow results in patients with BC who are eligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) both in early and advanced disease stages and before and after treatment.

METHODS

Bone marrow specimens from 41 patients with BC as well as from 35 normal volunteers and 17 patients with hematologic tumors were examined for maspin transcript expression by a modified nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction technique.

RESULTS

Maspin transcript was found in all normal and neoplastic breast tissues and in none of the 35 normal bone marrow specimens (specificity, 100%; 95% confidence interval, 90-100%). However, the transcript was found in 40% of the bone marrow samples from patients with hematologic malignancies. Thus, this marker appears very specific for discriminating between normal controls and patients with BC, but it cannot be considered disease specific. Among patients with BC, bone marrow was positive for the maspin transcript in 32% of patients with early-stage disease and in 75% of patients with metastatic disease before chemotherapy. After treatment, in 75% of patients with early-stage disease and in 50% of patients with metastatic disease, the bone marrow results became maspin negative.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the current data, although it is not disease specific, maspin is a reliable marker for detecting bone marrow molecular disease in patients with BC and should be considered for prospective studies as a prognostic indicator and as an assay for monitoring residual disease.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection of breast cancer micrometastasis using a multigene marker panel

Real-time RT-PCR is a relatively new technology that uses an online fluorescence detection system to determine gene expression levels. It has the potential to significantly improve detection of breast cancer metastasis by virtue of its exquisite sensitivity, high throughput capacity and quantitative readout system. To assess the utility of this technology in breast cancer staging, we determined the relative expression levels of 12 cancer-associated genes (mam, PIP, mamB, CEA, CK19, VEGF, erbB2, muc1, c-myc, p97, vim and Ki67) in 51 negative-control normal lymph nodes and in 17 histopathology-positive ALNs. We then performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity levels of each gene. Areas under the ROC curve indicated that the most accurate diagnostic markers were mam (99.6%), PIP (93.3%), CK19 (91.0%), mamB (87.9%), muc1 (81.5%) and CEA (79.4.0%). mam was overexpressed in 16 of 17 lymph nodes known to contain metastatic breast cancer at levels ranging from 22- to 2.8 x 10(5)-fold above normal mean expression, whereas PIP was overexpressed from 30- to 2.2 x 10(6)-fold above normal in 13 lymph nodes. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of pathology-negative LN from breast cancer patients revealed evidence of overexpression of PIP (6 nodes), mam (3 nodes) and CEA (1 node) in 8 of 21 nodes (38%). Our results provide evidence that mam, PIP, CK19, mamB, muc1 and CEA can be applied as a panel for detection of metastatic and occult micrometastatic disease.

Down regulation of the tumor suppressor gene maspin in breast carcinoma is associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis

BACKGROUND

Maspin (mammary serpin) is a relatively novel serine protease inhibitor with tumor suppressing function in breast cancer. Maspin expression was found in normal breast epithelial cells, but was decreased during tumor progression. Only a few systematic analyses of this phenomenon have been undertaken so far. In this study we developed specific nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) conditions for the detection of maspin expression in human breast carcinoma and assessed maspin's association with the clinical behavior of primary breast cancers.

METHODS

Tumor specimens obtained from 45 primary breast cancer patients were analyzed for maspin expression by a nested RT-PCR assay. Recurrence free survival was evaluated and correlated to maspin expression.

RESULTS

The maspin transcript was detected in 29 (64%) breast cancer specimens whereas no expression was found in 16 (36%) cancer specimens. This expression was unrelated to any of the established prognostic factors. However, 6 out of 8 patients who developed distant metastasis (lymph nodes, lung, liver, bone, pleura) within 3 yr after their initial diagnosis showed no maspin expression of the primary breast cancer (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of maspin expression in breast cancer seems to be associated with a short disease free survival and supports maspin's function as an indicator of tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Nested RT-PCR is a sensitive method to determine maspin expression in human breast cancer tissue.

Detection of occult metastasis in patients with breast cancer

The most important factor affecting the outcome of patients with invasive cancer is whether the tumor has spread, either regionally (to regional lymph nodes) or systemically. However, a proportion of patients with no evidence of systemic dissemination will develop recurrent disease after primary "curative" therapy. Clearly, these patients had occult systemic spread of disease that was undetectable by routinely employed methods (careful pathological, clinical, biochemical, and radiological evaluation). In addition, the success of adjuvant therapy is assumed to stem from its ability to eradicate occult metastases before they become clinically evident. Therefore, methods for the detection of occult metastases in patients with the earliest stage of cancer, i.e., prior to detection of metastases by any other clinical or pathological analysis, have received a great deal of attention.

Molecular characterization of minimal residual cancer cells in patients with solid tumors

The failure to reduce the mortality of patients with solid tumors is mainly a result of the early dissemination of cancer cells to secondary sites, which is usually missed by conventional diagnostic procedures used for tumor staging. PCR was shown to be superior to conventional techniques in detecting circulating tumor cells and micrometastases allowing the identification of one tumor cell in up to 10(7) normal cells in various sources such as blood, bone marrow, lymph nodes, urine or stool. The methods used are based on the detection of either genomic alterations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes or on the mRNA expression of tissue-specific and tumor-associated genes. The additional implementation of techniques for cancer cell purification had a significant impact on analytical sensitivity and specificity of MRCC detection. For patients with e.g. melanoma, breast, colorectal or prostate cancer it was demonstrated that the presence of disseminated cancer cells defines a subgroup of patients with reduced time to recurrence. The possibility to use easily accessible body fluids as a source for MRCC detection enables longitudinal observations of the disease. In this review we discuss the potential of molecular characterization of MRCC as a tool to improve prognostication, therapy selection and drug targeting as well as therapy monitoring.

High-sensitivity array analysis of gene expression for the early detection of disseminated breast tumor cells in peripheral blood

Early detection is an effective means of reducing cancer mortality. Here, we describe a highly sensitive high-throughput screen that can identify panels of markers for the early detection of solid tumor cells disseminated in peripheral blood. The method is a two-step combination of differential display and high-sensitivity cDNA arrays. In a primary screen, differential display identified 170 candidate marker genes differentially expressed between breast tumor cells and normal breast epithelial cells. In a secondary screen, high-sensitivity arrays assessed expression levels of these genes in 48 blood samples, 22 from healthy volunteers and 26 from breast cancer patients. Cluster analysis identified a group of 12 genes that were elevated in the blood of cancer patients. Permutation analysis of individual genes defined five core genes (P < or = 0.05, permax test). As a group, the 12 genes generally distinguished accurately between healthy volunteers and patients with breast cancer. Mean expression levels of the 12 genes were elevated in 77% (10 of 13) untreated invasive cancer patients, whereas cluster analysis correctly classified volunteers and patients (P = 0.0022, Fisher's exact test). Quantitative real-time PCR confirmed array results and indicated that the sensitivity of the assay (1:2 x 10(8) transcripts) was sufficient to detect disseminated solid tumor cells in blood. Expression-based blood assays developed with the screening approach described here have the potential to detect and classify solid tumor cells originating from virtually any primary site in the body.

Detection of mammaglobin expressing cells in blood of breast cancer patients

Expression of human mammaglobin (hMAM) was published to be exclusively expressed in mammary tissue, in solid tumors, axillary lymph nodes and disseminated cancer cells in blood of breast cancer patients. A quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was applied to investigate hMAM expression in blood of breast cancer patients. Mammaglobin mRNA expression was found not only in breast cancer cell lines but also in cell lines of other cancer origin. In our patient cohort hMAM expression in 11/98 (11%) samples of breast cancer and 3/12 (25%) ovarian cancer patients could be detected. hMAM mRNA expression as a candidate marker for the detection of disseminated cancer cells in blood of breast cancer patients showed low sensitivity and reduced tissue specificity. A prognostic significance of hMAM expression could not be demonstrated.

Molecular detection and characterisation of circulating tumour cells and micrometastases in solid tumours

The detection and molecular characterisation of circulating tumour cells (CTC) and micrometastases may have important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Because their numbers are very small, these tumour cells are not easily detected using conventional methods. In the last decade, numerous groups have attempted to detect occult tumour cells in solid malignancies using the highly sensitive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). These assays were in the vast majority directed against tissue-specific markers. PCR was shown to be superior to conventional techniques in detecting occult tumour cells allowing the identification of one malignant cell mixed with 1-10 million normal cells. In some tumours like melanoma and prostatic carcinoma, tissue-specific transcripts were detected with high specificity in the blood of patients with localised and advanced disease. In some reports, PCR was shown to be a strong predictor of poorer outcome. However, due to the many limitations of PCR (e.g false-positives), many groups are developing new approaches for the detection of occult tumour cells. The most attractive technique involves immunomagnetic isolation of CTC and micrometastases prior to downstream analysis. The tumour-rich magnetic fraction can be subjected to RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation. This will lead to better quantification and molecular characterisation of these tumour cells. In conclusion, the molecular detection and characterisation of occult tumour cells offer a great opportunity for better stratifying patients with solid tumours and for developing new prognostic markers and targeted therapies.

Competitive cytokeratin 19 RT-PCR for quantification of breast cancer cells in blood cell suspensions

Detection of residual tumor cells in BM and PBPC products has been correlated with worse outcome of breast cancer patients. Still, there is a considerable demand for studies investigating the influence of the actual tumor cell number on prognosis, as quantification routinely has been cumbersome and time consuming and, thus, was evaded. We developed and evaluated a competitive RT-PCR-ELISA assay for cytokeratin 19 (CK19) with standard curve quantification that allows quantification of multiple samples within a working day; mRNA isolation, RT-PCR reaction, and automated ELISA detection were carried out using commercial kits. Results were expressed as OD420nm ratios of CK19 and an internal competitor. Values were then converted into tumor cell numbers using a standard curve of MCF-7 tumor cells. The assay had high specificity because of primers and capture probes with great heterogeneity to both published pseudogenes, which was confirmed by BLAST sequence alignment. We achieved a sensitivity of detecting 1 tumor cell per 10(6) mononuclear cells (MNC). Between-batch precision (n = 8) for quantification was consistent and reasonable, with a coefficient of variation around 25%. Therefore, this assay should be suitable and sufficient for routine quantification of tumor cell numbers in BM or PBPC samples.