Reasons People Living with HIV Might Prefer Oral Daily Antiretroviral Therapy, Long-Acting Formulations, or Future HIV Remission Options

A Universal Approach to Educating Patients with HIV about Long-Acting Injectable Treatment for HIV

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI ART) has the potential to transform HIV care and reduce HIV-related health inequities in achieving and maintaining viral suppression. However, without a plan for equitable roll-out of LAI ART, new pharmacological innovations in HIV treatment and prevention risk further deepening health disparities. This study delineates a process for providing universal LAI ART education to people with HIV (PWH) at an urban outpatient infectious disease clinic and documents the outcomes of these efforts. We compared the number and proportion of patients with HIV educated about injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine (iCAB/RPV) and, among those educated, the number and proportion of patients interested in learning more about iCAB/RPV under a selective education model compared to a universal education model, disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used a Chi-sq test to estimate p-values for the difference in proportions. The universal compared to selective education approach resulted in a larger proportion of clients educated and a greater proportion of people educated reporting interest in LAI ART. Slight differences observed between those never versus ever educated in the selective education were absent after the adoption of a universal education approach. Reasons for disinterest -- including fear of injections, not interested in more frequent clinic visits, and content with oral ART regimen -- did not differ across educational approaches. Our programmatic data offers preliminary evidence that a universal education approach can support and enhance equitable roll-out of LAI ART. Most patients with HIV are interested in learning more about LAI ART.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Orally Administered VH4011499, a New HIV-1 Capsid Inhibitor, in Adults Without HIV

INTRODUCTION

This first-time-in-human study describes the pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interaction potential, and safety of VH4011499 (VH-499), a new HIV-1 capsid inhibitor.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study evaluated VH-499 in adults without HIV administered orally as single ascending doses as powder-in-bottle (PiB; part 1) and tablet (part 3) formulations and as multiple ascending doses as PiB formulation dosed once daily for 14 days (part 2). Midazolam was used to evaluate the effect of VH-499 on cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity (part 2).

RESULTS

Overall, 73 participants were included (VH-499, n = 56; placebo, n = 17). VH-499 plasma exposures were less than dose-proportional, with median time to maximum observed concentration of 8.0-12.0 h for the PiB formulation and 24.0 h for the tablet formulation. Geometric mean terminal half-life was 51.2-66.5 h (2-3 days). The tablet formulation resulted in 45-63% lower exposures compared with PiB. Concomitant midazolam administration after single and multiple VH-499 doses did not lead to clinically significant changes in midazolam or 1-hydroxymidazolam exposures; therefore, VH-499 is not expected to inhibit or induce CYP3A4. VH-499 was well tolerated. Adverse event (AE) frequency was comparable between placebo and VH-499 groups. VH-499-related AEs were predominantly grade 1. No serious AEs across VH-499 groups, AEs leading to withdrawal from drug/study, or deaths occurred. There were no trends in vital signs, electrocardiograms, or laboratory hematology parameters and no clinically relevant changes in chemistry parameters.

CONCLUSION

First-time-in-human data further characterize the pharmacokinetics of orally administered VH-499 and provide support for development of VH-499 as part of a complete long-acting regimen for HIV-1 treatment and prevention.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05393271.

Transitions in treatment: A systematic review and meta-aggregation of preferences and barriers in switching from oral to long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV and stakeholders

INTRODUCTION

Antiretroviral treatment (ART) has significantly enhanced health outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH). With the evolution of treatment options, there is an increasing interest in the development of long-acting injectable formulations of antiretroviral drugs. These formulations present a promising alternative to oral ART.

METHODS

The methodology and reporting of this systematic review followed the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ). The comprehensive searches involved multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINHAL (EBSCO), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Web of Science, Wanfang (Chinese), CNKI (Chinese), Google Scholar and Baidu Scholar (Chinese).

RESULTS

In all, 142 studies were identified and 20 eligible studies were included in the meta-aggregation. A total of 141 findings, 20 categories and nine synthesized findings were extracted from 20 studies. The nine synthesized findings identified from the 20 studies focused on the following topics: benefits, flexibility and practicality of long-acting injectable (LAI) treatment; scepticism about the use of LAI treatment; management challenges; logistical challenges; potential for protecting marginalized populations; concerns about side effects; financial issue; suggestions for improvement. PLWH's geographical distribution, backgrounds, demographics and clinical characteristics were limited.

CONCLUSION

We recommend considering the needs and experiences of PLWH in the transition from oral ART to LAI treatment. For marginalized populations, it is crucial to maintain regular communication with healthcare providers and institutions. Additionally, at the community level, engaging diverse stakeholders with valuable insights is vital, as is enhancing health education programmes and intensifying efforts to combat discrimination. These measures will play a key role in addressing the needs of PLWH, enhancing public awareness and promoting better understanding of LAI treatment.

HIV Clinical Providers' Awareness, Attitudes, and Willingness to Support Patient Outreach Efforts for HIV Cure-Directed Research in Philadelphia, United States

Background

Ethical patient outreach is critical for engaging patients with HIV in HIV cure-directed research. We sought to examine HIV clinical providers' awareness of current HIV cure-directed research strategies investigated through the Martin Delaney Collaboratories (MDC) and providers' attitudes toward patient outreach for HIV cure-directed research and to identify opportunities for clinical provider education on MDC research strategies.

Methods

We conducted a 1-time, cross-sectional, web-based survey with 64 HIV clinical providers (physicians, physician assistants, and nurses) in Philadelphia. A descriptive analysis was generated to determine clinical providers' awareness of MDC research strategies and attitudes toward patient outreach. Bivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in awareness and attitudes by provider characteristics.

Results

Most providers were aware of MDC strategies, and nearly three-fourths of providers reported familiarity with 1 of the 2 Philadelphia MDC research programs. Providers overwhelmingly endorsed the need for clinicians to assist with patient outreach for HIV cure-directed research and were willing to recommend patients to participate. Enthusiasm for patient outreach waned if a study required a patient to undergo analytic treatment interruptions (ATIs). Providers identified preferred resources for receiving HIV cure-directed research updates, including webinars with continuing education credit and conferences.

Conclusions

Our study's findings advocate for added investment toward developing resources that better engage clinical providers about HIV cure-directed research updates and ongoing studies, including the importance of ATIs. As gatekeepers to patient participation on HIV cure-directed studies, added efforts to increase provider knowledge of specific HIV cure-directed research will advance patient education and ethical outreach.

Patient and clinic staff perspectives on the implementation of a long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy program in an urban safety-net health system

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (LAI CAB/RPV) has several potential benefits over daily oral formulations for HIV treatment, including the potential to facilitate long-term adherence and reduce pill fatigue. We aimed to assess facilitators of and barriers to LAI CAB/RPV implementation and delivery through the perspectives of physicians and clinical staff, and the experiences of LAI CAB/RPV use among people living with HIV (PLWH) at a Ryan-White supported safety-net clinic in North Texas.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with recruited clinic staff (physicians, nurses, and support staff) involved with LAI CAB/RPV implementation and PLWH who switched to LAI CAB/RPV and consented to participate in individual interviews. Data were collected from July to October 2023. Our interview guide was informed by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM), and Proctor Implementation Outcomes frameworks. Qualitative data were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis approach to summarize key themes.

RESULTS

We recruited and interviewed 15 PLWH who transitioned to LAI CAB/RPV and 11 clinic staff serving these patients. PLWH conveyed that emotional and informational support from family or a trusted clinician influenced their decision to switch to LAI CAB/RPV. PLWH also reported that injectable treatment was more effective, convenient, and acceptable than oral antiretroviral therapy. Clinic staff and physicians reported that staff training, pharmacist-led medication switches, flexible appointments, refrigeration space and designated room for injection delivery facilitated implementation. Clinic staff cited medication costs, understaffing, insurance prior authorization requirements, and lack of medication access through state drug assistance programs as critical barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study offers insights into real-world experiences with LAI usage from the patient perspective and identifies potential strategies to promote LAI CAB/RPV uptake. The barriers to and facilitators of LAI CAB/RPV program implementation reported by clinic staff in our study may be useful for informing strategies to optimize LAI CAB/RPV programs.

"This Is Actually a Really Unique Moment in Time": Navigating Long-Acting HIV Treatment and HIV Cure Research with Analytical Treatment Interruptions-A Qualitative Interview Study in the United States

Advancements in long-acting (LA) HIV treatment and cure research with analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs) have generated important scientific and implementation questions. There is an urgent need to examine challenges navigating the evolving HIV treatment and cure research landscape. From August to October 2022, we conducted 26 semistructured interviews with biomedical researchers and community members representing a predominantly woman demographic to explore the complexity of navigating the rapidly evolving HIV therapeutic and HIV cure research landscape. We purposively sampled individuals recruited from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the Martin Delaney Collaboratories for HIV Cure Research. Audio files were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through a thematic approach, using an inductive and iterative process. Among 26 participants, 10 were biomedical researchers and 16 community members, including 11 were people with HIV. Three main themes emerged: (1) We are at a pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of HIV therapeutics and LA HIV treatment and HIV cure research should not be siloed but considered together; (2) There are challenges with engagement in HIV cure research and in switching between oral daily antiretroviral treatment and LA formulations and, mainly, the prolonged pharmacokinetic tail of these compounds matched with limited patient education about their impacts; and (3) There are unique opportunities as a result of this evolving therapeutic landscape, including the key role of decision support for people with HIV, centering around patient autonomy, and the need to learn from the lived experiences of people with HIV who choose LA treatment and/or participation in HIV cure research. Despite a bias toward the woman gender, our study identifies key considerations for navigating concurrent LA HIV treatment and HIV cure research with ATIs from both community members and biomedical researchers' perspectives. Achieving optimal HIV control remains a formidable challenge, necessitating robust interdisciplinary collaborations and engagement with key stakeholders.

Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among People with HIV Receiving Care at Three Ryan White Funded Clinics in the United States

Understanding the acceptability of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) among people with HIV (PWH), especially priority populations, is essential for effective implementation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients in three Ryan White-funded HIV clinics in San Francisco, Chicago, and Atlanta. We employed maximal variation sampling across age, gender, race, ethnicity, and time living with HIV and oversampled for individuals with suboptimal clinical engagement. An 8-step hybrid deductive and inductive thematic analysis approach guided data analysis. Between August 2020 and July 2021, we conducted 72 interviews. Median age was 46 years; 28% were ciswomen, 7% transwomen, 44% Black/African-American and 35% Latinx, 43% endorsed a psychiatric diagnosis, 35% were experiencing homelessness/unstable housing, and 10% had recent substance use. Approximately 24% were sub-optimally engaged in care. We observed a spectrum of LAI-ART acceptability, ranging from enthusiasm to hesitancy to rejection. We also characterized four emergent orientations towards LAI-ART: innovator, pragmatist, deliberator, and skeptic. Overall, the majority of participants expressed favorable initial reactions towards LAI-ART. Most approached LAI-ART pragmatically, but acceptability was not static, often increasing over the course of the interview. Participants considered their HIV providers as essential for affirming personal relevance. HIV stigma, privacy concerns, and medical mistrust had varied impacts, sometimes facilitating and other times hindering personal relevance. These findings held across priority populations, specifically young adults, cis/trans women, racial/ethnic minorities, and individuals with suboptimal clinical engagement. Further research is needed to explore the transition from hypothetical acceptance to uptake and to confirm the actual benefits and drawbacks of this treatment.

"What Is the Benefit?": Perceptions and Preferences for Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among People Living With HIV

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) expands treatment options for people living with HIV (PLWH). This qualitative study characterizes LA-ART awareness, perceptions, and preferences among PLWH engaged in HIV care. From 2019 through 2021, we conducted semistructured in-depth interviews with 71 PLWH sampled from three clinics in three U.S. settings (North Carolina, Washington, DC, Massachusetts). Transcripts were analyzed using narrative and thematic techniques. Participant mean age was 46 years (range 24-72); most were cisgender men (55%) and virally suppressed (73%). Most participants had not heard of LA-ART and reacted with a mix of excitement and cautiousness. Potential LA-ART benefits included easier adherence, privacy, and effectiveness; concerns included effectiveness, side effects, costs, and increased clinic visits. Participants appreciated that LA-ART could support achieving and sustaining viral suppression. To inform their decision, participants wanted more information and convenient access and administration. Findings indicated that a shared decision-making approach and economic and logistical support for PLWH could facilitate LA-ART uptake.

The New Era of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy: When and Why to Make the Switch

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the availability of safe and effective oral combination antiretroviral therapy, barriers to maintaining viral suppression remain a challenge to ending the HIV epidemic. Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy was developed as an alternative to daily oral therapy. This review summarizes the current literature on the efficacy of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV-1, reasons to switch to injectable therapy, and barriers to switching.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is safe and effective in maintaining HIV-1 virologic suppression. Ideal candidates for switching to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine are virologically suppressed on oral regimens with good adherence and no history of virologic failure or baseline resistance. Indications to switch to injectable therapy include patient preference, the potential for improved adherence, and avoidance of adverse effects. Implementation research is needed to assess and overcome system barriers. Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is a novel alternative to oral antiretrovirals, with the potential to improve adherence and quality of life in people with HIV.

Acceptance Rate and Reasons for Rejection of Long Acting Injectable Antiretrovirals

In January 2021, cabotegravir/rilpivirine, the first extended-release injectable regimen for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) was approved. Long-acting injections have the potential to improve adherence and viral suppression. We analyzed the acceptance rate of, and reasons for declining to switch to, the new regimen. During routine appointments, 102 people living with HIV (PLWH) were presented with information on the new medication and asked if they would like to switch from their current regimen. If they declined to switch, they were asked why. Sixty-nine percent of respondents declined to switch, with frequency of injections as the primary reason. Patients indicated they would be willing to switch if the interval between injections was longer. Forty percent of the patients accepting the injectable anti-retrovirals (ARVs) were not on any other medications. Barriers to switching to long-acting injectable ARVs include the need for more frequent provider visits, aversion to needles, and a perceived lack of evidence supporting the new medication.

Overcoming Challenges of Online Research: Measures to Ensure Enrollment of Eligible Participants

BACKGROUND

Internet-based surveys are increasingly used for health research because they offer several advantages including greater geographic reach, increased participant anonymity, and reduced financial/time burden. However, there is also a need to address inherent challenges, such as the likelihood of fraudulent responses and greater difficulty in determining eligibility.

METHODS

We conducted an online nationwide survey of 18-29 year olds living with HIV in the United States, to assess willingness to participate in HIV cure research. To ensure that respondents met age and HIV serostatus inclusion criteria, we instituted screening procedures to identify ineligible respondents using tools that were built into the survey platform (eg, reCAPTCHA, geolocation) and required documentation of age and serostatus before providing access to the incentivized study survey.

RESULTS

Of 1308 eligibility surveys, 569 were incomplete or ineligible because of reported age or serostatus. Of the remaining 739 potentially eligible respondents, we determined that 413 were from fraudulent, bot, or ineligible respondents. We sent individual study survey links to 326 participants (25% of all eligibility survey respondents) whose eligibility was reviewed and confirmed by our study team.

CONCLUSION

Our multicomponent strategy was effective for identifying ineligible and fraudulent responses to our eligibility survey, allowing us to send the study survey link only to those whose eligibility we were able to confirm. Our findings suggest that proactive fraud prevention can be built into the screening phase of the study to prevent wasted resources related to data cleaning and unretrievable study incentives and ultimately improve the quality of data.

Antiretroviral therapy experience, satisfaction, and preferences among a diverse sample of young adults living with HIV

Youth and young adults living with HIV (YLWH) have a high HIV infection rate and suboptimal oral medication adherence. Biomedical researchers hope that long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LAART) modalities can help those who struggle with daily oral adherence. While adults living with HIV have expressed interest in LAART, little research has explored perspectives of YLWH. This study explores ART experiences and perspectives on LAART through qualitative interviews with twenty diverse YLWH (18-29) in the United States. Data were analyzed using framework analysis. Most participants were satisfied with their current ART yet had experienced side effects or had struggled with daily adherence. Preferences for improving daily oral ART included making pills smaller and reformulating ART into flavored chewable gummies. Most expressed enthusiasm for LAART, although needle aversion and previous injection drug use were potential barriers for some. Approximately half were interested in an ART patch, though its visibility and fear of stigmatization was concerning. Few expressed interest in implantable ART, calling it unappealing. Although younger people are most likely to benefit from these advancements in HIV treatment, additional research is needed to identify gaps in uptake and to further explore perspectives of YLWH to improve the success of new treatment modalities.

Key population perceptions and opinions about long-acting antiretrovirals for prevention and treatment: a scoping review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Key populations are disproportionately affected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Access, retention, and adherence are important barriers for the efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and HIV treatment among these populations. Long-acting (LA) antiretrovirals hold the promise to solve some of these backdrops. The objective of the current review is to update the perceptions of key populations and PLWH about LA, based on their opinion, acceptability, and willingness to use it.

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the review preferences for LA vary with the population studied. Regarding people living with HIV (PLWH), male having sex with men are interested in having different options, adolescents are interested in LA (strong preference for implants), yet also perceive substantial obstacles to using biomedical prevention; transgender women aimed to nonvisible small implants, with long-lasting effects or LA injections that can be applied in other areas than buttocks, and women who experienced history of medical injections might increase preference for LA (except for history of people who inject drugs [IDU]). Female sex workers and IDU both showed interest in LA-PrEP. Regarding antiretroviral therapy, LA increased treatment satisfaction and acceptance, mainly among those receiving injections every 2 months. LA helped overcome pill fatigue, stigma, and adherence issues.

SUMMARY

Knowing preferences for biomedical interventions will contribute to better understanding and developing effective strategies for these populations.

Long-Acting Injectable ART and PrEP Among Women in Six Cities Across the United States: A Qualitative Analysis of Who Would Benefit the Most

Long-acting injectable (LAI) modalities have been developed for ART and PrEP. Women face unique barriers to LAI use yet little research has examined women's perceptions of potential LAI HIV therapy candidates. We conducted 89 in-depth interviews at six Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) sites with women living with HIV (n = 59) and HIV-negative women (n = 30) from 2017 to 2018. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Participants identified specific sub-populations who could most benefit from LAI over daily pills: (1) young people; (2) women with childcare responsibilities; (3) people with adherence-related psychological distress; (4) individuals with multiple sex partners; and (5) people facing structural insecurities such as homelessness. Women are underserved by current HIV care options and their perspectives are imperative to ensure a successful scale-up of LAI PrEP and LAI ART that prioritizes equitable access and benefit for all individuals.

Long-acting antiretrovirals: a new era for the management and prevention of HIV infection

The long-acting antiretroviral cabotegravir and rilpivirine combination has just received FDA, EMA and Health Canada approval. This novel drug delivery approach is about to revolutionize the therapy of people living with HIV, decreasing the 365 daily pill burden to only six intramuscular injections per year. In addition, islatravir, a first-in-class nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, is intended to be formulated as an implant with a dosing interval of 1 year or more. At present, long-acting antiretroviral therapies (LA-ARTs) are given at fixed standard doses, irrespectively of the patient's weight and BMI, and without consideration for host genetic and non-genetic factors likely influencing their systemic disposition. Despite a few remaining challenges related to administration (e.g. pain, dedicated medical procedure), the development and implementation of LA-ARTs can overcome long-term adherence issues by improving patients' privacy and reducing social stigma associated with the daily oral intake of anti-HIV treatments. Yet, the current 'one-size-fits-all' approach does not account for the recognized significant inter-individual variability in LA-ART pharmacokinetics. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), an important tool for precision medicine, may provide physicians with valuable information on actual drug exposure in patients, contributing to improve their management in real life. The present review aims to update the current state of knowledge on these novel promising LA-ARTs and discusses their implications, particularly from a clinical pharmacokinetics perspective, for the future management and prevention of HIV infection, issues of ongoing importance in the absence of curative treatment or an effective vaccine.

Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda

BACKGROUND

The pursuit of a cure for HIV is a high priority for researchers, funding agencies, governments and people living with HIV (PLWH). To date, over 250 biomedical studies worldwide are or have been related to discovering a safe, effective, and scalable HIV cure, most of which are early translational research and experimental medicine. As HIV cure research increases, it is critical to identify and address the ethical challenges posed by this research.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the growing HIV cure research ethics literature, focusing on articles published in English peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2021. We extracted and summarized key developments in the ethics of HIV cure research. Twelve community advocates actively engaged in HIV cure research provided input on this summary and suggested areas warranting further ethical inquiry and foresight via email exchange and video conferencing.

DISCUSSION

Despite substantial scholarship related to the ethics of HIV cure research, additional attention should focus on emerging issues in six categories of ethical issues: (1) social value (ongoing and emerging biomedical research and scalability considerations); (2) scientific validity (study design issues, such as the use of analytical treatment interruptions and placebos); (3) fair selection of participants (equity and justice considerations); (4) favorable benefit/risk balance (early phase research, benefit-risk balance, risk perception, psychological risks, and pediatric research); (5) informed consent (attention to language, decision-making, informed consent processes and scientific uncertainty); and (6) respect for enrolled participants and community (perspectives of people living with HIV and affected communities and representation).

CONCLUSION

HIV cure research ethics has an unfinished agenda. Scientific research and bioethics should work in tandem to advance ethical HIV cure research. Because the science of HIV cure research will continue to rapidly advance, ethical considerations of the major themes we identified will need to be revisited and refined over time.

The LAIs Are Coming! Implementation Science Considerations for Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy in the United States: A Scoping Review

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) is one of the latest advancements in HIV control with the potential to overcome oral ART barriers to adherence. The objective of this article is to anticipate and examine implementation considerations for LAI-ART using components of the PRISM model, a Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model for integrating research findings into practice. We conducted a scoping review from January to August 2020 of the growing literature on LAI-ART implementation and other fields using LAI therapies. Key considerations regarding LAI-ART were parsed from the searches and entered into the PRISM implementation science framework. The PRISM framework posed multiple questions for consideration in the development of an optimal implementation strategy for LAI-ART in the United States. These questions revealed the necessity for more data, including acceptability of LAI-ART among many different subgroups of people living with HIV (PLWH), cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes, as well as more detailed information related to the external environment for optimal LAI-ART implementation. Ethical considerations of LAI-ART will also need to be considered. The anticipation of, and excitement for, LAI-ART represent the hope for a new direction for HIV treatment that reduces adherence barriers and improves prognoses for PLWH. We have a unique window of opportunity to anticipate implementation considerations for LAI-ART, so this new therapy can be used to its fullest potential. Outstanding questions remain, however, that need to be addressed to help achieve HIV suppression goals in diverse populations.

The Promise of Improved Adherence With Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy: What Are the Data?

As with other chronic conditions, adherence to daily medications remains a challenge for many individuals living with HIV due to structural, behavioral, and social barriers. Unfortunately, high levels of adherence to antiretroviral therapy are required to maintain virologic suppression. Alternative approaches are being explored to decrease the burden of daily pill administration, including long-acting injectable, oral, and implantable products. Phase 3 data support the efficacy of nanoformulated injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine for HIV treatment in patients with undetectable viremia, but we have yet to learn how this strategy may benefit those with medication adherence challenges. Despite this, the affected community and HIV providers are very interested in exploring the role of long-acting therapies to address some types of barriers to medication adherence. This review summarizes available information about the potential for long-acting therapy to improve adherence for some patients and outlines associated opportunities and challenges with the implementation of long-acting therapy for the treatment and prevention of HIV.