Temperature Changes Inside the Kidney: What Happens During Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet Laser Usage?

Monitoring Intrarenal temperature changes during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery: a novel pilot study

Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy is widely used for urinary stone treatment, but concerns persist regarding its thermal effects on renal tissues. This study aimed to monitor intrarenal temperature changes during kidney stone treatment using retrograde intrarenal surgery with Ho: YAG laser. Fifteen patients were enrolled. Various laser power settings (0.8 J/10 Hz, 1.2 J/12 Hz) and irrigation modes (10 cc/min, 15 cc/min, 20 cc/min, gravity irrigation, and manual pump irrigation) were used. A sterile thermal probe was attached to a flexible ureterorenoscope and delivered into the calyceal system via the ureteral access sheath. Temperature changes were recorded with a T-type thermal probe with ± 0.1 °C accuracy. Laser power significantly influenced mean temperature, with a 4.981 °C difference between 14 W and 8 W laser power (p < 0.001). The mean temperature was 2.075 °C higher with gravity irrigation and 2.828 °C lower with manual pump irrigation (p = 0.038 and p = 0.005, respectively). Body mass index, laser power, irrigation model, and operator duty cycle explained 49.5% of mean temperature variability (Adj. R2 = 0.495). Laser power and operator duty cycle positively impacted mean temperature, while body mass index and specific irrigation models affected it negatively. Laser power and irrigation rate are critical for intrarenal temperature during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy. Optimal settings and irrigation strategies are vital for minimizing thermal injury risk. This study underscores the need for ongoing research to understand and mitigate thermal effects during laser lithotripsy.

Evaluation of a novel circulation system for ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in vitro

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cooling effect and other advantages of a novel circulation system for ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (URSL) in a standardized in vitro model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The novel circulation system was assembled by connecting a 4Fr ureteral catheter and a filter. Trails were divided into a new URSL group and a conventional URSL group. First, different power settings (18-30 W) of the holmium laser and irrigation flow rates (20-50 mL/min) were used to evaluate the thermal effect on the lithotripsy site of all groups. Then, renal pelvic temperature and pressure were assessed during URSL at a power of 1.5 J/20 Hz and irrigation flow rates of (20-50 mL/min). Finally, the whole process of lithotripsy was performed at 1.5 J/20 Hz (operator duty cycle ODC: 50%) with an irrigation flow rate of 30 mL/min. The time required for lithotripsy, visual field clarity, and stone migration were observed.

RESULTS

Temperature of the lithotripsy point was significantly lower in the new URSL group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05) with irrigation rates (20, 30 mL/min). The renal pelvic pressure of the new group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group in which intrarenal hypertension developed at an irrigation rate of 50 ml/min. The new group had better visual clarity and lesser stone upward migration when lithotripsy was performed at 1.5 J/20 Hz and 30 ml/min.

CONCLUSION

The novel circulation system is more effective in reducing the thermal effects of URSL, pelvic pressure, stone upward migration, and improving the visual clarity of the operative field.

Laser safety, warnings, and limits in retrograde intrarenal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the current information about laser safety in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), focusing on the two main laser technologies that we use in urology, the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser, and the thulium fiber laser (TFL).

METHODS

Narrative overview of the most relevant articles published in MEDLINE and Scopus databases about this subject.

RESULTS

TFL and Ho:YAG laser at similar settings (0.2 J/40 Hz) have similar volume-averaged temperature increase and the average heating rate increase proportionally to laser power, especially when high frequencies are used. Recent preclinical data, comparing both laser technologies at different laser settings, agreed that when the delivered energy increases in expenses of higher frequencies, the thermal damage increases too. Higher frequencies, despite of the rise of temperature in the irrigation medium, can cause accidental thermal lasering lesions.

CONCLUSION

The use of low frequency settings and a proper irrigation is critical to avoid thermal injury in endoscopic laser lithotripsy. In addition, the use of laser safety eyeglasses is recommended in Ho:YAG and TFL ELL.

Temperature change during laser upper-tract endourological procedures: current evidence and future perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the most recent data on temperatures produced during laser lithotripsy and to provide several strategies for maintaining lower values and reducing the risk of complications during endourological treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endourologists have access to a wide range of alternatives with the help of the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG), thulium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (TM:YAG), and thulium fiber laser (TFL) that compose a robust and adaptable laser lithotripsy armamentarium. Nevertheless, the threat of thermal damage increases as the local temperature rises with high total power. Most endourologists are not familiar with normal and pathological temperature ranges, how elevated temperatures affect perioperative problems, or how to avoid them.

SUMMARY

Increased temperatures experienced during laser lithotripsy may affect the course of the healing process. All lasers display a safe temperature profile at energies below 40 W. At equal power settings, Ho:YAG, Tm:YAG, and TFL lasers change the temperature comparably. Shorter on/off laser activation intervals, chilled irrigation, open irrigation systems, and UASs all aid in maintaining acceptable temperatures.

Determination of Irrigation Flowrate During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Methods for Calculation Using Renal Pelvis Pressure

BACKGROUND

Proper control of irrigation flowrate during ureteroscopy is important to manage thermal and pressure risks. This task is challenging because flowrate is not directly measured by commercially available ureteroscopic or fluid management systems. However, flowrate can be calculated using a hydrodynamic relationship based on measurable values during ureteroscopy. Objectives of this in vitro study were to 1) calculate inflow resistance for different working channel conditions and then using these values 2) calculate irrigation flowrate and determine its accuracy across a range of renal pelvis pressures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 16 Liter container was filled with deionized water and connected by irrigation tubing to a 9.6Fr single-use ureteroscope. Inflow resistance was determined by plotting flowrate (mass of fluid collected from ureteroscope tip in 60 seconds) versus irrigation pressure (range 0-200 cmH2O). Next, the tip of the ureteroscope was inserted into the renal pelvis of a silicone kidney-ureter model and renal pelvis pressure was measured. In conjunction with the previously determined inflow resistance and known irrigation pressure values, flowrate was calculated and compared to experimentally measured values. All trials were performed in triplicate for working channel conditions: empty, 200µm laser fiber, 365µm laser fiber, and 1.9Fr stone basket.

RESULTS

Flowrate was linearly dependent on irrigation pressure for each working channel condition. Inflow resistance was determined to be 5.0 cmH2O/(ml/min) with the 200µm laser fiber in the working channel and calculated flowrates were within 1 ml/min of measured flowrates. Similar results were seen with a 365µm laser fiber, and 1.9Fr basket.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing renal pelvis pressure measurements, flowrate was accurately calculated across a range of working channel conditions and irrigation pressures. Incorporation of this methodology into future ureteroscopic systems that measure intrarenal pressure, could provide a real-time readout of flowrate for the urologist and thereby enhance safety and efficiency of laser lithotripsy.

Theoretical and experimental evaluation of the distance dependence of fiber-based fluorescence and reflection measurements for laser lithotripsy

OBJECTIVES

In laser lithotripsy, a green aiming beam overlying the infrared (IR) treatment radiation gives rise to reflection and fluorescence signals that can be measured via the treatment fiber. While stone autofluorescence is used for target detection, the condition of the fiber can be assessed based on its Fresnel reflection. For good applicability, fluorescence detection of stones should work even when the stone and fiber are not in direct contact. Fiber breakage detection, on the other hand, can be falsified if surfaces located in front of the fiber reflect light from the aiming laser back into it. For both applications, therefore, a fundamental investigation of the dependence of the signal amplitude on the distance between fiber and surface is important.

METHODS

Calculations of the signal drop of fluorescence or diffuse and specular reflection with increasing fiber distance were performed using ray tracing based on a simple geometric model for different fiber core diameters. Reflection signals from a mirror, diffuse reflector, human calculi, and porcine renal tissue placed in water were measured at varying distances (0 - 5 mm). For human calculi, fluorescence signals were recorded simultaneously.

RESULTS

The calculations showed a linear signal decrease down to ~60% of the maximum signal (fiber in contact). The distance z at which the signal drops to for example 50% depends linearly on the diameter of the fiber core. For fibers used in lithotripsy and positioned in water,z_50%ranges from 0.55 mm (200 µm core diameter) to 2.73 mm (1 mm core diameter). The calculations were in good agreement with the experimental results.

CONCLUSIONS

The autofluorescence signals of stones can be measured in non-contact mode. Evaluating the Fresnel signal of the end face of the fiber to detect breakage is possible unless the fiber is situated less than some millimeters to reflecting surfaces.

Temperature assessment study of ex vivo holmium laser enucleation of the prostate model

Purpose

There isscarce evidence to date on how temperature develops during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). We aimed to determine the potential heat generation during HoLEP under ex vivo conditions.

Methods

We developed two experimental setups. Firstly, we simulated HoLEP ex vivo using narrow-neck laboratory bottles mimicking enucleation cavities and a prostate resection trainer. Seven temperature probes were placed at different locations in the experimental setup, and the heat generation was measured separately during laser application. Secondly, we simulated high-frequency current-based coagulation of the vessels using a roller probe.

Results

We observed that the larger the enucleated cavity, the higher the temperature rises, regardless of the irrigation flow rate. The highest temperature difference with an irrigation flow was approximately + 4.5 K for a cavity measuring 100ccm and a 300 ml/min irrigation flow rate. The higher flow rate generates faster removal of the generated heat, thus cooling down the artificial cavity. Furthermore, the temperature differences at different irrigation flow rates (except at 0 ml/min) were consistently below 5 K. Within the resection trainer, the temperature increase with and without irrigation flow was approximately 0.5 K and 3.0 K, respectively. The mean depth of necrosis (1084 ± 176 µm) achieved by the roller probe was significantly greater when using 144 W energy.

Conclusion

Carefully adjusted irrigation and monitoring during HoLEP are crucial when evacuating the thermal energy generated during the procedure. We believe this study of ours provides evidence with the potential to facilitate clinical studies on patient safety.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04041-z.

Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies

PURPOSE

To perform a review on the latest evidence related to generated temperatures during Ho:YAG laser use, and present different tools to maintain decreased values, and minimize complication rates during endourological procedures.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL, restricted to original English-written articles, including animal, artificial model, and human studies. Different keywords were URS, RIRS, ureteroscopy, percutaneous, PCNL, and laser.

RESULTS

Thermal dose (t43) is an acceptable tool to assess possible thermal damage using the generated temperature and the time of laser exposure. A t43 value of more than 120 min leads to a high risk of thermal tissue injury and at temperatures higher than 43 °C Ho:YAG laser use becomes hazardous due to an exponentially increased cytotoxic effect. Using open continuous flow, or chilled irrigation, temperatures remain lower than 45 °C. By utilizing high-power (> 40 W) or shorter laser pulse, temperatures rise above the accepted threshold, but adding a ureteral access sheath (UAS) helps to maintain acceptable values.

CONCLUSIONS

Open irrigation systems, chilled irrigation, UASs, laser power < 40 W, and shorter on/off laser activation intervals help to keep intrarenal temperatures at accepted values during URS and PCNL.

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Flexible Ureteroscopes in Proximal Ureteral and Renal Stone Management

INTRODUCTION

We sought to compare the safety, efficacy, efficiency and surgeon experience during upper urinary tract stone management with single-lumen versus dual-lumen flexible ureteroscopes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with proximal ureteral or renal stone burden < 2 cm were randomized to a single-lumen or dual-lumen flexible ureteroscopy. We recorded times for ureteroscopy, laser lithotripsy, stone basketing, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications. The rate of stone clearance and stone free status were calculated using computed tomography imaging. Surgeons completed a survey after each procedure rating various metrics regarding ureteroscope performance.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients from the single-lumen group and forty-four patients from the dual-lumen group had comparable median ureteroscopy time (37 vs 35 minutes, p=0.984) and basketing time (12 vs 19 min; p=0.584). Median lithotripsy time was decreased in the dual-lumen group (single: 6 vs dual: 2 min, p=0.017). The stone clearance rate was superior in the dual-lumen group (single: 3.7 vs dual: 7.1 mm3/min, p=0.025). The absolute stone-free rate was superior for the dual-lumen group (single: 26% vs dual: 48%, p=0.045). No differences in intraoperative (single: 0% vs dual: 2%; p=0.375) and postoperative complications (single: 7% vs dual: 11%, p=0.474) were observed. Surgeons' ratings of the dual-lumen ureteroscope was superior for visibility, comfort, ease of use, and overall performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the dual-lumen ureteroscope in patients with renal and proximal ureteral stones < 2 cm provided shorter lithotripsy time, higher stone clearance rates, improved stone free rate and superior surgeon ratings when compared to single-lumen flexible ureteroscopes.

Intrarenal temperature measurement associated with holmium laser intracorporeal lithotripsy in an ex vivo model

Introduction

The aim of this article was to quantify the effect of the use of holmium laser during intracorporeal lithotripsy in an ex vivo model.

Material and methods

A simulated model for laser nephro-lithotripsy was designed. Two ex vivo porcine kidneys were used. Electronic thermometer electrodes were inserted on the upper calyx. Intracorporeal lithotripsy was simulated with a holmium laser. Intrarenal temperature was recorded both at the beginning and after one minute of laser use with delta temperature (DT) defined as the difference between them. Measurements were made at different irrigation heights (30, 40, and 50 cm H₂O), frequency (Hz), and laser energy (J) in addition to the presence or absence of the access sheath. Analysis of factors associated with temperature change was performed.

Results

Thirty-eight observations were recorded. The measurement without the use of access sheath showed an average DT of 4.9, 5.1, and 6.5°C for 5, 10, and 15 Hz, respectively; however, with a sheath, DTs were 0.2, 0.5, and 1.5°C. In terms of energy, mean DTs of 4.3, 6.1, 5.2, and 13.9°C for 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.5 J were recorded; in contrast, with a sheath, averages of 0.4, 0.5, 0.5, and 3.8°C, respectively were noted. In the adjusted model, energy, frequency, and use of sheath and water height were significant.

Conclusions

The configuration of the laser significantly modifies the intrarenal temperature and height of the bladder irrigation. The use of an access sheath provides lower intrarenal temperatures regardless of laser configuration and water height.

15 and 30 W Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotriptor in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Which One Is More Effective and Safe?

Background: Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy with ureteroscopy (URS) was a safe and successful treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones. We aimed to comparatively evaluate the outcomes of 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors in pediatric ureter stones. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 55 children who underwent ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to treat ureter stone size up to 15 mm between September 2009 and March 2020. Groups were formed according to the laser lithotriptor power 15 W (Group 15: n = 32), 30 W (Group 30: n = 23). The efficiency of laser lithotriptors was compared between the groups. Results: The age, gender, and stone characteristics (longest stone diameter, density, location and multiple stones) were similar between the groups. In the postop first month, stone-free status was achieved in all cases except one child in Group 15. The median operative time was significantly shorter in Group 30 (40 minutes) than in Group 15 (52.5 minutes) (P = .010). Clavien-Dindo class (CDC) 2 complications occurred in 2 children in both groups (P = .597). Although ureteric stenosis was observed in 1 patient in Group 15, no ureteric stenosis was seen in Group 30 during follow-up (median 16.1 months). Length of hospital stay (LoHS) and stone-free rates were similar between groups. Conclusion: URS with 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors is an effective treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones with a high success rate and low complication rates. In brief, 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors should be preferred over 15 W lithotriptors due to their shorter operative time with similar success rate.

"VirtualBasket" ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

The "VirtualBasket" technology is the result of pulse modulation during holmium laser emission: the laser emits part of the energy to create an initial bubble, and a second pulse is emitted when the vapor bubble is at its maximum expansion, so that it can pass through the previously created vapor channel. The aim of this study is to outline the outcomes of the "VirtualBasket" technology in ureteral and renal stones.

METHODS

160 Patients were randomly assigned to holmium laser lithotripsy with or without the "VirtualBasket" technology in ureteric or renal cases (40 per 4 groups). All procedures were performed by four experienced urologists. The Quanta System Cyber Ho 100W laser generator with 365 μm fibers was used for all of the ureteral cases, whereas, 272 μm fibers were used for all of the cases in the renal pelvis. Demographic data, stone parameters, perioperative complications and success rates were compared. A statistical analysis was carried out to assess patients data and outcomes. All of the reported p-values were obtained with the two-sided exact method at the conventional 5% significance level. The degree of stone retropulsion was graded on a Likert scale from zero (no retropulsion) to 3 (maximum retropulsion).

RESULTS

All groups were comparable in terms of age, and pre-operative stone size (ureter stone size: 1.2 vs. 1.1 cm; renal pelvis stone size: 1.55 vs. 1.62 cm). Compared to the regular mode, the "VirtualBasket" technology was associated with significantly lower fragmentation time (mean time for ureteral stones: 20.4 vs. 16.1 minutes, p<0.05; mean time for renal stones: 28.7 vs. 19.8 minutes, p<0.05) and total procedural time (mean time for ureteral stones 49 vs. 35.7 minutes; mean time for renal stones 67.1 vs. 52.4 minutes). There were no significant differences in terms of energy delivered to the stones, intraoperative complications and success rate at 1 month. The "VirtualBasket" technology was associated with significantly lower retropulsion.

CONCLUSIONS

The "VirtualBasket" technology is associated with significantly lower fragmentation and procedural times. The reduced fragmentation time is a result of the significantly lower retropulsion of the stones during laser lithotripsy, which improves stone fragmentation efficiency.

Temperature Assessment of a Novel Pulsed Thulium Solid-State Laser Compared with a Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser

Purpose: To compare a novel Thulium laser device with the commonly used Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser in terms of the in vitro temperatures generated. Methods: Our study investigated and compared an evaluation model of a solid-state Thulium laser with a Medilas H Solvo 35 Holmium laser device, both by Dornier (Dornier MedTech Laser GmbH, Wessling, Germany). Our in vitro model consisted of a 20 mL test tube placed in a 37°C water bath. Constant irrigation was set at 50 mL/minute with a Reglo Z Digital pump (Cole Parmer, Chicago, IL). Four hundred micrometers of Dornier laser fibers were used. The temperature was measured with a type K thermocouple and a real-time data logger from Pico (PICO Technology, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom). Power settings between 2 and 30 W were investigated. Each measurement lasted 120 seconds and was repeated five times. The data were evaluated by MATLAB^® (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA). Results: The resulting temperatures were directly proportional to the power supplied. When comparing Holmium with Thulium, we observed maximum deviations of ≤0.82 K in temperatures at 120 seconds. The highest investigated laser power of 30 W yielded maximum temperatures differing by 6.7 K from the initial value. Out of the five comparisons, Thulium showed marginally yet significantly lower end temperatures in four cases and slightly lower cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C (CEM₄₃) values in three cases. Conclusion: The Thulium laser resembles the Holmium device in the temperatures generated during in vitro application. An increase in laser power, thus, leads to equivalent increases in temperature that are largely independent of frequency, pulse duration, and single pulse energy. Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG), Ho:YAG, and Thulium fiber laser seem to share a similar risk profile for patients in terms of temperature development. Intrarenal power outputs exceeding 10 W during clinical application should be compensated by ensuring sufficient irrigation.

Temperature profiles of calyceal irrigation fluids during flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate calyceal irrigation fluid temperature changes during flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients with kidney stones undergoing flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy were enrolled. A K-type thermocouple was applied for intraoperative temperature measurement. Laser was activated at different power (1 J/20 Hz and 0.5 J/20 Hz) and irrigation (0 ml/min, 15 ml/min and 30 ml/min) settings, temperature-time curve was drawn and time needed to reach 43 °C without irrigation was documented.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in our study. The temperature-time curve revealed a quick temperature increase followed by a plateau. With 15 ml/min or 30 ml/min irrigation, 43 °C was not reached after 60 s laser activation at both 1 J/20 Hz and 0.5 J/20 Hz. At the power setting of 1 J/20 Hz and irrigation flow rate of 15 ml/min, the temperature rise was significantly higher than other groups. Without irrigation, the time needed to reach 43 °C at 1 J/20 Hz was significantly shorter than that at 0.5 J/20 Hz (8.84 ± 1.41 s vs. 13.71 ± 1.53 s).

CONCLUSION

Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy can induce significant temperature rise in calyceal fluid. With sufficient irrigation, temperatures can be limited so that a toxic thermal dose is not reached, when irrigation is closed, the temperature increased sharply and reached 43 °C in a few seconds.

In Vitro Dusting Performance of a New Solid State Thulium Laser Compared to Holmium Laser Lithotripsy

Purpose: To examine the dusting performance of a novel solid state Thulium laser device compared to a standard holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) device. Methods: This study compares a Dornier Medilas H Solvo 35 with an evaluation model of a pulsed solid state thulium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) laser (Dornier MedTech Laser GmbH, Wessling, Germany). The in vitro model consisted of a mold with irrigated water at 37°C. For 2-9 minutes, laser fibers were guided by an xy-plotter in spirals over BegoStones. Stone mass was measured before and after laser application. Comparisons to Ho:YAG and further Tm:YAG investigations were performed. Results: Identical settings with similar pulse durations yielded a significant 14% advantage for Ho:YAG in slow fiber speeds and a tendency toward 15% higher efficiency of Tm:YAG in fast fiber speeds. Increased pulse duration in Tm:YAG led significantly to 32%-54% higher ablation rates in comparison to Tm:YAG in both setups. Ablated mass loss range is 102-1107 mg for slow fiber speeds and 22-528 mg for fast speeds. Mass loss is proportional to pulse energy, frequency, and pulse duration, whereas pulse energy defines the penetration depth into the model stones. Frequency characterizes the ablation homogeneity and possible working speeds. Conclusion: Tm:YAG is significantly more efficient when longer pulse durations are used. Identical settings revealed a strong connection to fiber movement speeds. In addition, the Tm:YAG device enables a broader range of settings with the possibility of minimal pulse energy of 100 mJ for low retropulsion and fine dusting with possible frequencies ≤200 Hz.

What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation

PURPOSE

To propose a size-related definition of stone dust produced by lithotripsy of urinary stones.

METHODS

Stone dust was defined as particles small enough to adhere to the following criteria: (1) spontaneous floating under 40 cm H₂O irrigation pressure; (2) mean sedimentation time of > 2 s through 10 cm saline solution; (3) fully suitable for aspiration through a 3.6 F working channel. Irrigation, sedimentation, and aspiration tests were set up to evaluate each criterion. Primary outcome was particle size limit agreeing with all three criteria. Stone particles with a given size limit (≤ 2 mm, ≤ 1 mm, ≤ 500 µm, ≤ 250 µm, ≤ 125 µm and ≤ 63 µm) were obtained from laser lithotripsy, including samples from prevailing stone types: calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, uric acid, carbapatite, struvite, brushite, and cystine.

RESULTS

All particles ≤ 250 µm from all stone types were in agreement with all three criteria defining stone dust, except for struvite where size limit for a positive irrigation and sedimentation test was ≤ 125 µm.

CONCLUSION

A size limit of ≤ 250 µm seems to generally adhere to our definition of stone dust, which is based on floating and sedimentation proprieties of stone particles, as well as on the ability to be fully aspirated through the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope.

Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Pulse Type Affects Irrigation Temperatures in a Benchtop Ureteral Model

Introduction: MOSES^™ technology is a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser pulse mode shown to minimize stone retropulsion. This may facilitate lithotripsy at higher power settings. However, power and heat production are proportional, and temperatures capable of tissue injury may occur during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Although previous in vitro studies demonstrate the importance of irrigation and activation time on heat production, the impact of pulse type has not been evaluated. Methods: A flexible ureteroscope with a 365 μm laser fiber was placed in an 11/13 F access sheath inserted into a 50 mL saline bag to simulate a ureter, renal pelvis, and antegrade irrigant flow. A thermocouple was placed adjacent to the laser tip, and the laser fired for 30 seconds at 0.6 J/6 Hz, 0.8 J/8 Hz, 1 J/10 Hz, 1 J/20 Hz, and 0.2 J/70 Hz at irrigation pressure of 100 mmHg. Four runs were tested per setting using short pulse, long pulse (LP), MOSES-contact (MC), and MOSES-distance (MD) modes. The mean temperature changes (dT) were compared and thermal dose was calculated in cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C (CEM43) using an adjusted baseline of 37°C. CEM43 ≥ 120 minutes was considered the tissue injury threshold. Results: At 0.8 J/8 Hz, LP produced the greatest dT, significantly higher than MC (p = 0.041). CEM43 did not exceed the injury threshold. At 1 J/10 Hz, dT was significantly higher for LP versus MC and MD (p = 0.024 and 0.045, respectively). Thermal dose remained below the injury threshold. No differences in dT were seen between pulse types at 0.6 J/6 Hz, 0.2 J/70 Hz, or 1 J/20 Hz. At 1 J/20 Hz, thermal dose exceeded the injury threshold for all pulse types within 3 seconds. Conclusions: Laser pulse type and length seemed to impact heat production in our ureteral model. LP produced significantly greater temperatures at 0.8 J/8 Hz and 1 J/10 Hz relative to MOSES settings. Fortunately, thermal dose remained safe at these settings. Both LP and MOSES technology have been shown to reduce stone retropulsion. At power ≤10 W, the latter may confer this advantage with decreased heat production.

Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy

The flashlamp-pumped, solid-state holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser has been the laser of choice for use in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the past 20 years. However, although the holmium laser works well on all stone compositions and is cost-effective, this technology still has several fundamental limitations. Newer laser technologies, including the frequency-doubled, double-pulse YAG (FREDDY), erbium:YAG, femtosecond, and thulium fibre lasers, have all been explored as potential alternatives to the holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. Each of these laser technologies is associated with technical advantages and disadvantages, and the search continues for the next generation of laser lithotripsy systems that can provide rapid, safe, and efficient stone ablation. New fibre-optic approaches for safer and more efficient delivery of the laser energy inside the urinary tract include the use of smaller-core fibres and fibres that are tapered, spherical, detachable or hollow steel, or have muzzle brake distal fibre-optic tips. These specialty fibres might provide advantages, including improved flexibility for maximal ureteroscope deflection, reduced cross section for increased saline irrigation rates through the working channel of the ureteroscope, reduced stone retropulsion for improved stone ablation efficiency, and reduced fibre degradation and burnback for longer fibre life.

Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis

Background

Single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURSs) have been recently introduced aiming to offer solutions to the sterilization, fragility and cost issues of the reusable fURSs. In order to be a viable alternative, the single-use scopes must prove similar capabilities when compared to their reusable counterparts. The goal of our in-vitro study was to compare the current reusable and single-use digital fURSs regarding their deflection, irrigation and vision characteristics.

Methods

We compared in-vitro 4 single-use fURSs-LithoVue™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA), Uscope™ (Zhuhai Pusen Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China), NeoFlex™ (NeoScope Inc, San Jose, California, USA) and ShaoGang™ (YouCare Technology Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China) versus 4 reusable fURSs-FLEX-X^c (Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany), URF-V2 (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan), COBRA vision and BOA vision (Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany). Deflection and irrigation abilities were evaluated with different instruments inserted through the working channel: laser fibres (200/273/365 µm), retrieval baskets (1.5/1.9/2.2 Fr), guide wires [polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) 0.038 inch, nitinol 0.035 inch] and a biopsy forceps. A scoring system was designed to compare the deflection impairment. Saline at different heights (40/80 cm) was used for irrigation. The flow was measured with the tip of the fURS initially straight and then fully deflected. The vision characteristics were evaluated (field of view, depth of field, image resolution, distortion and colour representation) using specific target models.

Results

Overall, the single-use fURSs had superior in-vitro deflection abilities than the reusable fURSs, in most settings. The highest score was achieved by NeoFlex™ and the lowest by ShaoGang™. PTFE guide wire had most impact on deflection for all fURSs. The 200 µm laser fibre had the lowest impact on deflection for the single-use fURSs. The 1.5 Fr basket caused the least deflection impairment on reusable fURSs. At the end of the tests, deflection loss was noted in most of the single-use fURSs, while none of the reusable fURSs presented deflection impairment. ShaoGang™ had the highest irrigation flow. Increasing the size of the instruments occupying the working channel led to decrease of irrigation flow in all fURSs. The impact of maximal deflection on irrigation flow was very low for all fURSs. When instruments were occupying the working channel, the single-use fURSs had slightly better in-vitro irrigation flow than the reusable fURSs. The field of view was comparable for all fURSs, with LithoVue™ showing a slight advantage. Depth of field and colour reproducibility were almost similar for all fURSs. ShaoGang™ and Uscope™ had the lowest resolution. FLEX X^c had the highest image distortion while LithoVue™ had the lowest. Partial field of view impairment was not for Uscope™ and ShaoGang™.

Conclusions

In-vitro, there are differences in technical characteristics of fURSs. It appears that single-use fURSs deflect better than their reusable counterparts. Irrespective of deflection, the irrigation flow of the single-use fURSs was slightly superior to the flow of the reusable fURSs. Overall, reusable fURSs had better vision characteristics than single-use fURSs. Further in-vivo studies might be necessary to confirm these findings.

The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review

The Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser has been the gold-standard for laser lithotripsy over the last 20 years. However, recent reports about a new prototype thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripter have revealed impressive levels of performance. We therefore decided to systematically review the reality and expectations for this new TFL technology. This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42019128695). A PubMed search was performed for papers including specific terms relevant to this systematic review published between the years 2015 and 2019, including already accepted but not yet published papers. Additionally, the medical sections of ScienceDirect, Wiley, SpringerLink, Mary Ann Liebert publishers, and Google Scholar were also searched for peer-reviewed abstract presentations. All relevant studies and data identified in the bibliographic search were selected, categorized, and summarized. The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines for this review. The TFL emits laser radiation at a wavelength of 1,940 nm, and has an optical penetration depth in water about four-times shorter than the Ho:YAG laser. This results in four-times lower stone ablation thresholds, as well as lower tissue ablation thresholds. As the TFL uses electronically-modulated laser diodes, it offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters, with pulse frequencies up to 2,200 Hz, very low to very high pulse energies (0.005-6 J), short to very long-pulse durations (200 µs up to 12 ms), and a total power level up to 55 W. The stone ablation efficiency is up to four-times that of the Ho:YAG laser for similar laser parameters, with associated implications for speed and operating time. When using dusting settings, the TFL outperforms the Ho:YAG laser in dust quantity and quality, producing much finer particles. Retropulsion is also significantly reduced and sometimes even absent with the TFL. The TFL can use small laser fibers (as small as 50 µm core), with resulting advantages in irrigation, scope deflection, retropulsion reduction, and (in)direct effects on accessibility, visibility, efficiency, and surgical time, as well as offering future miniaturization possibilities. Similar to the Ho:YAG laser, the TFL can also be used for soft tissue applications such as prostate enucleation (ThuFLEP). The TFL machine itself is seven times smaller and eight times lighter than a high-power Ho:YAG laser system, and consumes nine times less energy. Maintenance is expected to be very low due to the durability of its components. The safety profile is also better in many aspects, i.e., for patients, instruments, and surgeons. The advantages of the TFL over the Ho:YAG laser are simply too extensive to be ignored. The TFL appears to be a real alternative to the Ho:YAG laser and become a true game-changer in laser lithotripsy. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of the TFL, and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations.

The Rise and Fall of High Temperatures During Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy

Introduction: Temperatures over 43°C-the threshold for cellular injury-may be achieved during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy. The time to reach and subsequently clear high temperatures at variable laser power settings and irrigation pressures has not been studied. Methods: A flexible or semirigid ureteroscope was placed within an 11/13 F ureteral access sheath inserted into a 250-mL saline bag simulating a normal-caliber ureter, renal pelvis reservoir, and antegrade irrigation flow. A thermocouple was placed adjacent to a 365 μm fiber fired for 45 seconds at 0.6 J/6 Hz, 0.8 J/8 Hz, 1 J/10 Hz, 1 J/20 Hz, and 0.2 J/80 Hz. Irrigation pressures of 200, 100, and 0 mm Hg were tested. Mean temperature changes were recorded with 6°C increase as a threshold for injury (as body temperature is 6°C below 43°C). Results: Semirigid scope: At 200 mm Hg no temperature changes >6°C were observed. At 100 mm Hg, changes >6°C occurred with 1 J/20 Hz within 1 second of activation and returned to ≤6°C within 1 second of cessation. At 0 mm Hg, changes >6°C occurred with all settings; within 1 second at power ≥10 W. Temperatures returned to ≤6°C within 5-10 seconds. Flexible scope: At 200 mm Hg, changes >6°C occurred at 1 J/10 Hz (15 seconds), 0.2 J/80 Hz (3 seconds), and 1 J/20 Hz (2 seconds). Temperatures returned within 6°C of baseline within 2 seconds. At 100 mm Hg, changes >6°C occurred in all but 0.6 J/6 Hz. Temperatures returned to ≤6°C in 5-10 seconds. At 0 mm Hg, all settings produced changes >6°C within 3 seconds, except 0.6 J/6 Hz (35 seconds). Temperatures returned to ≤6°C in under 10 seconds. Conclusions: High temperatures were achieved in our in vitro model in as little as 1 second at common irrigation pressures and laser settings, particularly with a flexible ureteroscope and power ≥10 W. However, with laser cessation, temperatures quickly returned to a safe level at each irrigation pressure.

Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the thermal effect of high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy in flexible/semirigid ureteroscopy (fURS/sURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in a standardized ex vivo porcine kidney model with real-time temperature assessment.

METHODS

The experimental setup consisted of three models designed to evaluate the thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in fURS, sURS and PNL, respectively. In all setups, a postmortem porcine kidney was placed in a 37 °C water bath. Three thermocouples were inserted into the renal parenchyma while a flexible thermocouple was placed 3-4 mm proximal to the laser fiber to measure temperature variations in the collecting system. The thermal impact was evaluated in relation to laser power between 5 and 100 W and various irrigation rates (37 °C, 0-100 ml/min).

RESULTS

In all three experimental setups, sufficient irrigation was required to prevent potentially damaging temperatures into the renal pelvis and parenchyma. Even 5 W in fURS can lead to a potentially harming temperature rise if insufficient irrigation is applied. Particularly, high-power settings ≥ 30 W carry an elevated risk for critical temperature rises. The results allow the definition of a specific irrigation threshold for any power setting to prevent critical temperatures in the present study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy bears the risk of thermal damages to the urinary tract even at low-power settings if inadequate irrigation is applied. Sufficient irrigation is mandatory to perform safe Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Based on the results, we developed a formula calculating the approximate ΔT for irrigation rates ≥ 30 ml/min: ΔT = 15 K × (power [W]/irrigation [ml/min]).

Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract

PURPOSE

Holmium laser lithotripsy is a common modality used to fragment urinary stones during ureteroscopy. Laser energy deposited during activation produces heat and potentially causes thermal bioeffects. We aimed to characterize laser-induced heating through a computational simulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A finite-element model was developed and used to estimate temperature in the urinary tract. Axisymmetric models of laser lithotripsy in a renal calyx, the renal pelvis, and proximal ureter were created. Heat generation by laser and heat transfer were simulated under different laser powers between 5 and 40 W. Irrigation fluid flow was introduced at rates between 0 and 40 mL/min. The model was validated by comparison with previous in vitro temperature data in a test tube, then used to calculate heating and thermal dose in the three tissue models.

RESULTS

Simulated temperature rises agreed well with most in vitro experimental measurements. In tissue models, temperature rises depended strongly on laser power and irrigation rate, and to a lesser extent on location. Injurious temperatures were reached for 5-40 W laser power without irrigation, >10 W with 5 mL/min irrigation, 40 W with 15 mL/min irrigation, and were not found at 40 mL/min irrigation. Tissue injury volumes up to 2.3 cm³ were calculated from thermal dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest a numerical model can accurately simulate the thermal profile of laser lithotripsy. Laser heating is strongly dependent on parameters and may cause a substantial temperature rise in the fluid in the urinary tract and surrounding tissue under clinically relevant conditions.

Holmium-YAG laser: impact of pulse energy and frequency on local fluid temperature in an in-vitro obstructed kidney calyx model

During laser lithotripsy, energy is transmitted to both the stone and the surrounding fluid. As the energy is delivered, the temperature will rise. Temperatures ≥60  °  C can cause protein denaturation. The objective of this study is to determine the time it takes from body temperature (37°C) to 60°C at various laser power settings. A Flexiva TracTip 200 optical fiber was submerged alongside a negative temperature coefficient-type thermistor in 4 mL of saline in a glass test tube. A Lumenis VersaPulse Powersuite 100-W holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser was activated at 0.2- to 1.5-J pulse energies, 6- to 50-Hz frequencies, and 2- to 22.5-W average power. Temperature readings were recorded every second from 37°C until 60°C. Time and heating rate were measured. The procedure was repeated three times for each setting. Average time from 37°C to 60°C for settings (1) 0.2 J/50 Hz, (2) 0.6 J/6 Hz, (3) 1 J/10 Hz, and (4) 1.5 J/10 Hz was 60.3, 172.7, 58, and 43.3 s, respectively. Time from 37°C to 60°C decreased as frequency increased for every given pulse energy. Average heating rate increased proportionally to power from 0.06°C/s at 2 W to 0.74°C/s at 22.5 W. During laser lithotripsy, there is a rapid increase in the temperature of its surrounding fluid and temperatures ≥60  °  C may be reached. This could have local tissue effects and some caution with higher power settings should be employed especially where irrigation is limited. Further studies incorporating irrigation and live tissue models may aid to further define the risks.

Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited]

The flashlamp-pumped, solid-state, pulsed, mid-infrared, holmium:YAG laser (λ = 2120 nm) has been the clinical gold standard laser for lithotripsy for over the past two decades. However, while the holmium laser is the dominant laser technology in ureteroscopy because it efficiently ablates all urinary stone types, this mature laser technology has several fundamental limitations. Alternative, mid-IR laser technologies, including a thulium fiber laser (λ = 1908 and 1940 nm), a thulium:YAG laser (λ = 2010 nm), and an erbium:YAG laser (λ = 2940 nm) have also been explored for lithotripsy. The capabilities and limitations of these mid-IR lasers are reviewed in the context of the quest for an ideal laser lithotripsy system capable of providing both rapid and safe ablation of urinary stones.

Caliceal Fluid Temperature During High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in an In Vivo Porcine Model

INTRODUCTION

With increasing use of high-power laser settings for lithotripsy, the potential exists to induce thermal tissue damage. In vitro studies have demonstrated that temperature elevation sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage can occur with certain laser and irrigation settings. The objective of this pilot study was to measure caliceal fluid temperature during high-power laser lithotripsy in an in vivo porcine model.

METHODS

Four female pigs (30-35 kg) were placed under general anesthesia and positioned supine. Retrograde ureteroscopy with entry into upper or middle calices was performed. Thermocouples were placed into the calix by open exposure and puncture of the kidney or retrograde alongside the ureteroscope. A 242 μm laser fiber was positioned in the center of the calix and activated (0.5 J, 80 Hz, 40 W) for 60 seconds with high, medium, or no irrigation delivered in each trial. Finite element simulations of laser-induced heating in a renal calix were also performed.

RESULTS

Peak temperatures of 84.8°C, 63.9°C, and 43.6°C were recorded for no, medium, and high irrigation, respectively. Mean time to reach threshold of thermal injury (t₄₃ of 120 minutes) was 12.7 and 17.8 seconds for no and medium irrigation. Thermal damage thresholds were not reached in high-irrigation trials. Numerical simulations revealed similar results with peak spatial average fluid temperatures of >100°C, 58.5°C, and 37.5°C during 60 seconds of laser activation for 0.1, 15, and 40 mL/minute irrigation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High-power holmium laser settings (40 W) can induce potentially injurious temperatures in the porcine in vivo model, particularly with slower irrigation rates. Characterization of thermal dose across a broader range of laser parameter settings is underway to map out the thermal safety envelope.

Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: facts and myths

The aim of the present paper was to review the literature on all available ureteral access sheaths (UASs) with their indications, limitations, risks, advantages and disadvantages in current modern endourological practice. Two authors searched Medline, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases to identify studies on UASs published in English. No time period restriction was applied. All original articles reporting outcomes or innovations were included. Additional articles identified through references lists were also included. Case reports, editorials, letters, review articles and meeting abstracts were excluded. A total of 754 abstracts were screened, 176 original articles were assessed for eligibility and 83 articles were included in the review. Based on a low level of evidence, UASs increase irrigation flow during flexible ureteroscopy and decrease intrapelvic pressure and probably infectious complications. Data were controversial and sparse on the impact of UASs on multiple reinsertions and withdrawals of a ureteroscope, stone-free rates, ureteroscope protection or damage, postoperative pain, risk of ureteral strictures, and also on its cost-effectiveness. Studies on the benefit of UASs in paediatrics and in patients with a coagulopathy were inconclusive. In the absence of good randomized data, the true impact of UASs on surgery outcome remains unclear. The present review may contribute to the evidence-based decision-making process at the individual patient level regarding whether or not a UAS should be used.

Advances in Lasers for the Treatment of Stones-a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laser lithotripsy is increasingly used worldwide and is a continuously evolving field with new and extensive research being published every year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Variable pulse length Ho:YAG lithotripters allow new lithotripsy parameters to be manipulated, and there is an effort to integrate new technologies into lithotripters. Pulsed thulium lasers seem to be a viable alternative to holmium lasers. The performance of similar laser fibers varies from manufacturer to manufacturer. Special laser fibers and "cleaving only" fiber tip preparation can be beneficial for the lithotripsy procedure. Different laser settings and the surgical technique employed can have significant impact on the success of laser lithotripsy. When safely done, complications of laser lithotripsy are rare and concern the endoscopic nature of procedure, not the technology itself, making laser lithotripsy one of the safest tools in urology. Laser lithotripsy has had several new developments and more insight has been gained in recent years with many more advances expected in the future.

Thermal effects of Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy: real-time evaluation in an in vitro model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the thermal effect of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in a standardized in vitro model via real-time temperature measurement.

METHODS

Our model comprised a 20 ml test tube simulating the renal pelvis that was immersed in a 37 °C water bath. Two different laser fibers [FlexiFib (15-45 W), RigiFib 1000 (45-100 W), LISA laser products OHG, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany] were placed in the test tube. An Ho:YAG 100 W laser was used in all experiments (LISA). Each experiment involved 120 s of continuous laser application, and was repeated five times. Different laser settings (high vs. low frequency, high vs. low energy, and long vs. short pulse duration), irrigation rates (0 up to 100 ml/min, realized by several pumps), and human calcium oxalate stone samples were analyzed. Temperature data were acquired by a real-time data logger with thermocouples (PICO Technology, Cambridgeshire, UK). Real-time measurements were assessed using MatLab^®.

RESULTS

Laser application with no irrigation results in a rapid increase in temperature up to ∆28 K, rising to 68 °C at 100 W. Low irrigation rates yield significantly higher temperature outcomes. Higher irrigation rates result immediately in a lower temperature rise. High irrigation rates of 100 ml/min result in a temperature rise of 5 K at the highest laser power setting (100 W).

CONCLUSIONS

Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy might be safe provided that there is sufficient irrigation. However, high power and low irrigation resulted in potentially tissue-damaging temperatures. Laser devices should, therefore, always be applied in conjunction with continuous, closely monitored irrigation whenever performing Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.