Sleep disturbance after rapid ascent to moderate altitude among infants and preverbal young children

What altitude is safe for infants? An expert panel survey

AIM

To assess advice given to parents who wish to travel to high altitudes with an infant and to provide guidance on this topic.

METHOD

Using an anonymous self-report survey online, we collected information on the advice provided by practitioners, who practice in mountain environments, to parents who wish to travel to altitude with an infant. General practitioners and pediatricians working in the French Alps were asked about the maximum allowable altitude for different ages and the specific recommendations given.

RESULTS

A total of 104 practitioners (39% general practitioners) responded to the study. Overall, to spend 1 day at altitude, practitioners recommended a median altitude of 1200, 1500, 1600, and 2000 m for infants under 1, 3, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Their main recommendations for infant protection focused on cold protection, increased hydration, and increased humidity level in the ambient air. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome was essential according to the respondents. For infants with upper airway infection, most of the participants (90%, n = 94) recommended against traveling to altitude.

CONCLUSION

This survey revealed a certain consensus about the maximum travel altitude to be recommended for infants.

Respiratory and polysomnographic values in 3- to 5-year-old normal children at higher altitude

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine polysomnographic parameter differences in children living at higher altitude to children living near sea level.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study of non-snoring, normal children recruited from various communities around Denver, CO. In-lab, overnight polysomnograms were performed at a tertiary care children's hospital. All children required residence for greater than one year at an elevation around 1,600 meters.

PARTICIPANTS

45 children (62% female), aged 3-5 years, 88.9% non-Hispanic white with average BMI percentile for age of 47.8% ± 30.7%.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Standard sleep indices were obtained and compared to previously published normative values in a similar population living near sea level (SLG). In the altitude group (AG), the apnea-hypopnea index was 1.8 ± 1.2 and the central apnea-hypopnea index was 1.7 ± 1.1, as compared to 0.9 ± 0.8 and 0.8 ± 0.7, respectively, (P ≤ 0.005) in SLG. Mean end-tidal CO2 level in AG was 42.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg and 40.6 ± 4.6 mm Hg in SLG (P = 0.049). The ≥ 4% desaturation index was 3.9 ± 2.0 in AG compared to 0.3 ± 0.4 in SLG (P < 0.001). Mean periodic limb movement in series index was 10.1 ± 12.3 in AG and 3.6 ± 5.4 in SLG (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Comparison of altitude and sea level sleep studies in healthy children reveals significant differences in central apnea, apneahypopnea, desaturation, and periodic limb movement in series indices. Clinical providers should be aware of these differences when interpreting sleep studies and incorporate altitude-adjusted normative values in therapeutic-decision making algorithms.

Use of actigraphy for assessment in pediatric sleep research

The use of actigraphs, or ambulatory devices that estimate sleep-wake patterns from activity levels, has become common in pediatric research. Actigraphy provides a more objective measure than parent-report, and has gained popularity due to its ability to measure sleep-wake patterns for extended periods of time in the child's natural environment. The purpose of this review is: 1) to provide comprehensive information on the historic and current uses of actigraphy in pediatric sleep research; 2) to review how actigraphy has been validated among pediatric populations; and 3) offer recommendations for methodological areas that should be included in all studies that utilize actigraphy, including the definition and scoring of variables commonly reported. The poor specificity to detect wake after sleep onset was consistently noted across devices and age groups, thus raising concerns about what is an "acceptable" level of specificity for actigraphy. Other notable findings from this review include the lack of standard scoring rules or variable definitions. Suggestions for the use and reporting of actigraphy in pediatric research are provided.