A Retrospective Study of the Cytokine Profile Changes in Mice with FVIII Inhibitor Development After Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Gene Therapy in a Hemophilia A Mouse Model

Roctavian gene therapy for hemophilia A

ABSTRACT

After successful efforts in adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene addition for hemophilia B gene therapy, the development of valoctocogene roxaparvovec (Roctavian; Biomarin) over the past decade represents a potential new hemophilia A (HA) treatment paradigm. Roctavian is the first licensed HA gene therapy that was conditionally approved in Europe in August 2022 and approved in the United States in June 2023. Beyond Roctavian, there are ongoing pivotal trials of additional AAV vectors for HA, others that are progressing through preclinical development or early-phase clinical trial, as well as non-AAV approaches in clinical development. This review focuses on the clinical development of Roctavian for which the collective clinical trials represent the largest body of work thus far available for any licensed AAV product. From this pioneering clinical development, several outstanding questions have emerged for which the answers will undoubtedly be important to the clinical adaptation of Roctavian and future efforts in HA gene therapy. Most notably, unexplained year-over-year declines in factor VIII (FVIII) expression after Roctavian treatment contrast with stable FVIII expression observed in other AAV HA gene therapy clinical trials with more modest initial FVIII expression. This observation has been qualitatively replicated in animal models that may permit mechanistic study. The development and approval of Roctavian is a landmark in HA therapeutics, although next-generation approaches are needed before HA gene therapy fulfills its promise of stable FVIII expression that normalizes hemostasis.

Association between interleukin-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism and FVIII inhibitor development in Indonesian patients with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in hemophilia A (HA) patients render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. Although its development cause is unclear, it has been classified into therapeutic and genetic-related etiologies. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in several cytokine genes, including interleukin (IL)-2, could increase the risk of FVIII inhibitor development. This study aimed to evaluate the association between IL-2 (rs2069762) gene SNP and FVIII inhibitor development in Indonesian patients with severe HA. METHODS The IL-2 (rs2069762) gene SNP was examined in 119 HA patients. The presence of FVIII inhibitors was quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, with a titer of <0.28 ng/ml considered negative. Patients were divided into two groups: 59 with FVIII inhibitors (positive group) and 60 without inhibitors (negative group). The genotype of the subjects was determined using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS There was no association between IL-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism and FVIII inhibitor development on genotypes (p = 0.138) and allele frequencies (p = 0.780). CONCLUSIONS IL-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism is not a risk factor in the development of FVIII inhibitors in Indonesian patients with severe HA. Thus, further polymorphism studies in other cytokine genes are required to gain a comprehensive understanding of the FVIII inhibitor development.

Naive haemophilia mice displayed different pattern of cytokine profiles of cytokine profiles changes might be associated with subclinical bleeding

Subclinical bleeding is a haemorrhage event not clinically detected in haemophilia, and no reliable method is available for predicting subclinical bleeding. We investigated whether haemophilia mice have subclinical haemorrhage and evaluated potential biomarkers including multiple cytokine changes to predict subclinical haemorrhage. Plasma from naïve FVIII-/- and FIX-/- mice and their wild-type counterparts (FVIII WT and FIX WT, respectively) were measured for prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) and multiple cytokines. Haemophilia mice with induced hemarthrosis were used as positive clinical bleeding controls. Naive haemophilia mice that displayed higher levels than positive bleeding control were counted. Univariate and multivariate analyses of cytokines were performed. Compared with wild-type mice (FVIII WT 1.1-6.2 vs. FIX WT 2.7-6.7 pmol/l), F1 + 2 widely varied in both haemophilia mouse strains (FVIII-/- 3.7-25.7 vs. FIX-/- 2.7-15.7 pmol/l). Each cytokine varied widely in both naive haemophilia A and B mice, but not significantly, for most cytokines. In comparison to haemophilia mice with hemarthrosis bleeding challenge, naive FVIII-/- mice had elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines and FIX-/- mice had elevated anti-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, interleukin (IL)-4, followed by IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and MIP-1α in FVIII-/- mice and MIP-1α, followed by IL-1, IL-10 in FVIII-/- mice exhibited significant differences potentially associated with potential subclinical bleeding. Naive haemophilia mice showed elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines with different patterns, represented by pro-inflammatory cytokine elevation in more naïve FVIII-/- mice and more anti-inflammatory cytokines in FIX-/- mice.

Risk factors for antibody formation in children with hemophilia: methodological aspects and clinical characteristics of the HEMFIL cohort study

Up to 35% of patients with hemophilia A and 5% with hemophilia B develop neutralizing antibodies which can inhibit the therapeutic activity of factor replacement (inhibitors). Despite the clinical relevance of antifactor VIII and IX neutralizing antibodies, there is still a major gap on the knowledge of risk factors for their development. Furthermore, most of the studies on risk factors for inhibitor development come from Caucasian and Afro-American populations. The HEMFIL is a Brazilian prospective cohort study of previously untreated children with hemophilia, which primary aim is to identify new risk factors related to inhibitor development. This manuscript aims at describing the study design and its methodology. After the diagnosis, children are followed up to 75 exposure days or to inhibitor development. Standardized forms and blood samples are collected to describe clinical characteristics and to perform the measurement of immunological and genetic biomarkers at three time points; Inclusion time (T0), at inhibitor development or at 75 exposure days without inhibitors (T1) and after immune tolerance induction for patients in whom it is indicated and performed (T2). Currently, 120 children have been included, of whom, 95 have completed the follow-up. For severe/moderately severe hemophilia A, the cumulative incidence of inhibitors at 75 exposure days was 35% (95% confidence interval, 26-46%). The inclusion of additional patients and a longer follow-up will allow the analysis of risk factors for inhibitor development.

Effect of the First Factor VIII Infusions on Immunological Biomarkers in Previously Untreated Patients with Hemophilia A from the HEMFIL Study

Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited bleeding disorder which requires continuous replacement with factor (F) VIII concentrate. The main complication of HA is the development of neutralizing alloantibodies which inhibit FVIII activity (inhibitors). The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the first FVIII infusions on immunological biomarkers in previously untreated patients with HA. Plasma samples were collected at enrollment before any FVIII infusion (T0) and at inhibitor development (INB +/T1) or up to 35 exposure days without inhibitors (INB -/T1). Anti-FVIII antibodies (immunoglobulin M, immunoglobulin G [IgG] 1, IgG3, and IgG4), chemokines (CCL2, CCL5, CXCL8, CXCL9, and CXCL10), and cytokines (interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor, and IL-17) were assessed. A total of 71 children with severe HA were included, of whom 28 (39.4%) developed inhibitors. Plasma levels of anti-FVIII IgG4, IL-6, and CXCL8 were higher at INB +/T1 when compared with INB -/T1. This group presented a mixed cytokine profile and higher plasma levels of CXCL9 and CXL10 when compared with INB +/T1. We conclude that exposure to FVIII triggers a proinflammatory response mediated by IL-6 and CXCL8 in patients with HA who developed inhibitors. Regardless of inhibitor status, the immune system of all HA patients is stimulated after infusions of FVIII.

Development of inhibitors in hemophilia A: An illustrated review

This illustrated review focuses on the development of inhibitors in patients with congenital hemophilia, which is the most serious treatment-related complication in these patients. Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited X-linked bleeding disorder affecting 1:5000-10 000 newborn males worldwide. It results from the deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), due to mutation(s) in its coding gene (F8). Treatment requires administration of FVIII-containing products either on demand or as prophylaxis, which can induce inhibitor development in 20%-35% of patients. Inhibitors are alloantibodies that neutralize the procoagulant activity of exogenous FVIII. During the initial administration of FVIII-containing products, patients with HA can develop a proinflammatory immune response with synthesis of anti-FVIII IgG1, which has no FVIII inhibitory activity. However, in patients with inhibitors, immune response shifts toward an anti-inflammatory/regulatory pattern favoring the synthesis of anti- FVIII IgG4 antibodies. Patients with inhibitors present with bleeding episodes that are difficult to control, and they have reduced response to FVIII replacement. Currently, immune tolerance induction is the available treatment for eradication of persistent high-titer inhibitors. Despite the clinical relevance, the immunological mechanisms for inhibitor development in patients with HA remains unexplained.

Long-Term Follow-Up of the First in Human Intravascular Delivery of AAV for Gene Transfer: AAV2-hFIX16 for Severe Hemophilia B

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are a leading platform for gene-based therapies for both monogenic and complex acquired disorders. The success of AAV gene transfer highlights the need to answer outstanding clinical questions of safety, durability, and the nature of the human immune response to AAV vectors. Here, we present longitudinal follow-up data of subjects who participated in the first trial of a systemically delivered AAV vector. Adult males (n = 7) with severe hemophilia B received an AAV2 vector at doses ranging from 8 × 10¹⁰ to 2 × 10¹² vg/kg to target hepatocyte-specific expression of coagulation factor IX; a subset (n = 4) was followed for 12-15 years post-vector administration. No major safety concerns were observed. There was no evidence of sustained hepatic toxicity or development of hepatocellular carcinoma as assessed by liver transaminase values, serum α-fetoprotein, and liver ultrasound. Subjects demonstrated persistent, increased AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to the infused AAV serotype 2 (AAV2) as well as all other AAV serotypes tested (AAV5 and AAV8) for the duration of follow-up. These data represent the longest available longitudinal follow-up data of subjects who received intravascular AAV and support the preliminary safety of intravascular AAV administration at the doses tested in adults. Data demonstrate, for the first time, the persistence of high-titer, multi-serotype cross-reactive AAV NAbs for up to 15 years post- AAV vector administration. Our observations are broadly applicable to the development of AAV-mediated gene therapy.

Exploring the Potential Feasibility of Intra-Articular Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Gene Therapy for Hemophilia Arthropathy

Hemophilia arthropathy (HA) represents the majority of morbidity in severe hemophilia patients, especially in resource-limited countries. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy is showing promise for managing hemophilia. However, patients with neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against AAV, and inhibitors to clotting factors, are excluded from such therapy. This study explored the feasibility of AAV-mediated local gene therapy for HA. Factor VIII knockout (FVIII^-/-) mice, with or without a FVIII inhibitor, were subjected to hemarthrosis induction and treated with either intravenous (IV) or intraarticular (IA) recombinant human factor VIII (rhFVIII). To investigate whether rhFVIII carried the risk to develop a FVIII inhibitor, FVIII^-/- mice were treated with three doses of IV or IA rhFVIII and inhibitor development was measured. In patients with established HA requiring synovial fluid aspiration, plasma, and synovial fluid were collected and measured for anti-AAV capsid IgG (serotypes 1-9 and 843) and NAbs for AAV843. IA rhFVIII provided better protection from synovitis compared with IV rhFVIII, with or without the FVIII inhibitor. While IV rhFVIII led to all FVIII^-/- mice developing an FVIII inhibitor (n = 31, median 4.9 Bethesda units [BU]/mL), only 50% of the mice developed a FVIII inhibitor by IA administration, and at a lower titer (median 0.55 BU/mL). In hemophilia patients, total anti-AAV IgG was lowest for AAV4 and AAV5, both in plasma and synovial fluid. Anti-AAV IgGs in synovial fluid for most samples were lower or similar to the plasma levels. These results show that direct IA rhFVIII administration yields better protection against bleeding-induced joint damage, even in the presence of an inhibitor antibody. IA rhFVIII delivery carried a lower risk of FVIII inhibitor formation compared with IV FVIII. The anti-AAV antibody level in synovial fluid was similar or lower than the plasma level, supporting the feasibility of local gene therapy for managing HA.

Autologous and Heterologous Cell Therapy for Hemophilia B toward Functional Restoration of Factor IX

Hemophilia B is an ideal target for gene- and cell-based therapies because of its monogenic nature and broad therapeutic index. Here, we demonstrate the use of cell therapy as a potential long-term cure for hemophilia B in our FIX-deficient mouse model. We show that transplanted, cryopreserved, cadaveric human hepatocytes remain functional for more than a year and secrete FIX at therapeutic levels. Hepatocytes from different sources (companies and donors) perform comparably in curing the bleeding defect. We also generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from two hemophilia B patients and corrected the disease-causing mutations in them by two different approaches (mutation specific and universal). These corrected iPSCs were differentiated into hepatocyte- like cells (HLCs) and transplanted into hemophilic mice. We demonstrate these iPSC-HLCs to be viable and functional in mouse models for 9–12 months. This study aims to establish the use of cells from autologous and heterologous sources to treat hemophilia B.

An Observational Study from Long-Term AAV Re-administration in Two Hemophilia Dogs

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have been successfully applied in hemophilia clinical trials. However, this approach is limited to patients without AAV-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). In this study, we explored the feasibility of AAV re-administration in hemophilia A dogs treated initially 8 years ago with AAV8.canine FVIII. After the re-administration in two NAb-negative dogs with AAV8 vectors carrying human factor VIII (hFVIII), along with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, we observed a phenotypic improvement in both dogs that persisted in one dog. Phenotypic improvement disappeared at 59 days after re-administration in the other dog, and specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to the capsid were detected at day 17, but not to hFVIII. hFVIII inhibitors were observed at day 59 and gradually increased. Mechanistic studies demonstrated an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, a decrease in immunomodulatory cytokines, as well as lower Tregs after re-administration. These results suggest that hFVIII inhibitor development may contribute to the therapeutic failure via immune response activation. Interestingly, it takes about 30–50 days for AAV NAb titers to decrease by half. Collectively, this study suggests that re-administration of the same AAV serotype after long-term follow-up is feasible and that the study of AAV NAb kinetics will provide important information for predicating the efficacy of re-administration.