Transgender Noninclusive Healthcare and Delaying Care Because of Fear: Connections to General Health and Mental Health Among Transgender Adults

Characteristics of a transgender and gender-diverse patient population in Utah: Use of electronic health records to advance clinical and health equity research

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, individuals whose gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth, face unique challenges in accessing gender-affirming care and often experience disparities in a variety of health outcomes. Clinical research on TGD health is limited by a lack of standardization on how to best identify these individuals. The objective of this retrospective cohort analysis was to accurately identify and describe TGD adults and their use of gender-affirming care from 2003-2023 in a healthcare system in Utah, United States. International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 and 10 codes and surgical procedure codes, along with sexual orientation and gender identity data were used to develop a dataset of 4,587 TGD adults. During this time frame, 2,985 adults received gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and/or gender-affirming surgery (GAS) within one healthcare system. There was no significant difference in race or ethnicity between TGD adults who received GAHT and/or GAS compared to TGD adults who did not receive such care. TGD adults who received GAHT and/or GAS were more likely to have commercial insurance coverage, and adults from rural communities were underrepresented. Patients seeking estradiol-based GAHT tended to be older than those seeking testosterone-based GAHT. The first GAS occurred in 2013, and uptake of GAS have doubled since 2018. This study provides a methodology to identify and examine TGD patients in other health systems and offers insights into emerging trends and access to gender-affirming care.

Breast and cervical cancer screenings across gender identity: results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE

Although national medical organizations often neglect to include trans and gender diverse (TGD) people in their breast and cervical cancer screening recommendations, the World Profession Association of Transgender Health recommends that TGD people who are at risk for these cancers follow existing guidelines for cisgender women. Despite WPATH's recommendations, TGD people are less likely to get screened in large part due to discrimination. The COVID-19 pandemic has limited access to cancer screenings among cisgender people, but it is unknown how this has impacted TGD people.

METHODS

Using national survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS), we examined differences in cervical and breast cancer screening noncompliance across gender identity at two time points: before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Screening noncompliance increased during the COVID-19 pandemic among cisgender and TGD people (e.g., transgender men, gender non-conforming people). Compared to cisgender women, transgender men and gender non-conforming respondents had higher odds of breast cancer screening noncompliance before and during COVID-19. Transgender men had lower odds of cervical cancer screening noncompliance than cisgender women before COVID-19, but higher odds during the pandemic. Gender non-conforming respondents also had lower odds of cervical cancer screening noncompliance during COVID-19 compared to cisgender women.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening noncompliance for breast and cervical cancer was more common among TGD people than cisgender women; while these disparities existed before the COVID-19 pandemic, they were exacerbated during the pandemic. Future work should move beyond descriptive statistics and elucidate underlying causes to inform interventions.

Direct and vicarious exposure to healthcare discrimination and erasure among transgender and gender independent individuals: Testing the indirect effect of mistrust in healthcare on utilization behaviors

RATIONALE

Direct exposure to gender identity-related discrimination and erasure among the transgender and gender independent (TGI) population are associated with healthcare underutilization, which may further exacerbate the health disparities that exist between this population and cisgender individuals in the United States (U.S.). Although the impacts of direct exposure to healthcare discrimination and erasure may have on TGI individuals are known, exposure to such harm vicariously (i.e., through observation or report) is underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

The present study examined the relationships among direct and vicarious gender identity-related healthcare discrimination and erasure exposure and past-year healthcare utilization.

METHOD

Gender identity-based mistrust in healthcare was also assessed, as a mechanism through which direct and vicarious gender identity-related healthcare discrimination and erasure predict healthcare utilization behaviors among a sample (N = 385) of TGI adults in the U.S., aged 18 to 71 recruited online.

RESULTS

Results indicated direct lifetime and vicarious healthcare discrimination and erasure exposure significantly predicted past-year healthcare underutilization when participants anticipated encountering gender identity-related healthcare discrimination. Mediational analyses indicated that higher levels of exposure to direct lifetime and vicarious healthcare discrimination and erasure were related to higher levels of mistrust in healthcare, through which past-year underutilization was significantly related.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are vital to informing healthcare practice and policy initiatives aimed at ensuring the barriers that deleteriously influence the accessibility of healthcare among TGI individuals are ameliorated.

Evidence-Based Education on Care of LGBTQ Patients: Improving Knowledge and Attitudes Among Pediatric Nurses

BACKGROUND

Due to stigma and mistreatment, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) patients and their families often face barriers to accessing and receiving equitable health care. Pediatric settings are not immune to this health inequity, yet there is limited literature to address it with pediatric nurses.

METHOD

An evidence-based education program on the care of LGBTQ patients was delivered electronically to pediatric nurses. Using a pre- and posttest design, knowledge and attitudes regarding care of LGBTQ patients were collected via online questionnaires.

RESULTS

Knowledge significantly increased from pre- to posttest (p = .02). Attitudes related to LGBTQ concepts either remained consistently positive or shifted in the positive direction.

CONCLUSION

Providing education regarding LGBTQ patients to pediatric nurses can improve related knowledge and attitudes. Expansion of evidence-based LGBTQ education to pediatric nurses is likely to contribute to lessening the health care barriers and inequities faced by these patients and their families. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(4):181-186.].

Mediational pathways exploring the link between adverse childhood experiences and physical health in a transgender population

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) consist of instances of abuse, neglect, or household dysfunction occurring before adulthood. Prevalence rates of ACEs are higher among specific populations, including gender minorities. In addition to ACEs, transgender individuals (TG) face many personal, social, and structural factors that have the potential to negatively impact their physical health.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines exploratory mediational pathways between ACEs and two health outcomes (i.e., general health and days physically ill) in TG. Mediators include everyday discrimination, social support, gender non-affirmation, and mental distress.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from the U.S. Transgender Population Health Survey (TransPop) was used to conduct a serial/parallel mediation analysis. The TransPop survey included a total of 274 TG.

RESULTS

For both outcome variables, the same three indirect pathways were significant. First, ACEs were associated with increased mental distress, which was associated with a decrease in general health and an increase in days physically ill. Second, ACEs were associated with increased discrimination, which was associated with increased mental distress, and this was associated with a decrease in general health and an increase in days physically ill. Finally, ACEs were associated with discrimination, which was associated with increased gender non-affirmation which was associated with increased mental distress, and this was associated with a decrease in general health and an increase in days physically ill.

CONCLUSION

Interventions focused on reducing discrimination, gender non-affirmation, and poor mental health may be vital to improving the health of TG and to mitigating the indirect role of ACEs on TG health.

Compelling care: A grounded theory of transmasculine self-defense and collective protection at the clinic

Despite formidable inequities in health care systems, transgender people are accessing clinical services in record numbers and gaining recognition as a patient population. This article examines how transgender people are negotiating their care and, in so doing, challenging patterns of marginalization and exclusion. Interviews with twenty-six transmasculine adults were collected and analyzed in the context of a community-led initiative foregrounding low-income people and people of color in Los Angeles County using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Participants gained agency in clinical settings by compelling care, a grounded theory that explains how patients contest medical authority and shift power through everyday acts to defend themselves and future patients. Histories of mistreatment and unequal social power drive patients to engage with health care providers judiciously and with a sense of social responsibility. In tracing seemingly decentralized acts of self-defense (e.g., vetting providers, disrupting gender norms, directing treatment), the study shows how patients rely on community resources and marshal collective protection. The theory recasts patients as constitutive actors in a changing landscape of care and as integral to, and one of many fronts of, collective struggle. In turn, the study lends theoretical insights to anti-racist understandings of medical mistrust andoffers a depathologized framework toward the development of community-building health equity interventions.

Two Gender Medicine: Provider-Side Barriers to Caring for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients

Experienced and anticipated discrimination during health care visits result in lower health care utilization rates, which contribute to persistent health disparities between transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals and the general population. Most strategies for improving health care delivery to TGD patients place the responsibility on providers, overlooking the role of medical systems and institutions in creating the environments where negative health care experiences occur. Relying on the inhabited institutionalism framework, this study explores system- and institutional-level barriers to the provision of quality care to TGD patients identified by health care providers and administrators, including relevant contextual details of, and interactions between, these barriers. Based on interview data from health care providers and administrators from a variety of practices across Texas, we identified two overarching themes and six subthemes. We demonstrate how our interviewees' responses reveal an institutional logic of "two-gender medicine," which creates barriers to health care provision in both formal medical education and training and throughout the managed care model of practice. We also illustrate how health care workers find ways to resist this logic in the course of their practice. Addressing these barriers to delivering competent and compassionate care to TGD patients that providers encounter could make long overdue strides toward addressing health disparities.

Prescription Pain Reliever Misuse Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults

Purpose

Little is known about the prevalence and risks associated with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons' misuse of prescription pain relievers (PPRs). This study explores the relationship between PPR misuse and various sociodemographic identities and experiences of discrimination in health care among TGD adults.

Methods

TGD participants (n=595) were recruited in 2018 to participate in a cross-sectional statewide trans health survey through convenience sampling. Chi-square tests of independence and logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between sociodemographics and experiences of discrimination among persons who had ever misused PPRs, or who had misused PPRs in the past year.

Results

Sociodemographics such as gender identity (odds ratio [OR]=0.44, p=0.01), race/ethnicity (OR=0.14, p<0.001), and sexual orientation influence TGD individuals likeliness of misusing PPRs (OR=0.40, p<0.001). Notably, those who were ever diagnosed with anxiety had a higher likeliness of having lifetime PPR misuse compared with those who were never diagnosed (OR=2.05, p=0.05), and those reporting past-year discrimination within the mental health care setting because of their gender identity were more than twice as likely to report past-year misuse than those who reported not experiencing it (OR=2.43, p=0.004).

Conclusion

Certain subpopulations of TGD individuals may be at elevated risk of PPR misuse. It is imperative to acknowledge the impact of multimarginalized identities as well as differences across various identities and experiences within the TGD community while working to address non-PPR misuse.

Situational Avoidance and Its Association with Mental Health Among Transgender Adults in South Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Purpose: In fear of discrimination or unwanted disclosure of their transgender identity, transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) people may commonly avoid daily activities. We assessed the prevalence of situational avoidance among TGNB people and examined its associations with mental health outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from a longitudinal survey conducted at baseline (2020) and follow-up (2021) among 268 TGNB people in South Korea. Situational avoidance due to transgender identity within the past 12 months was assessed based on 12 kinds of daily activities (e.g., public bathroom use, job applications, and hospital visits). Past-week depressive symptoms and past 2-week anxiety symptoms were measured with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale and General Anxiety Disorder Scale, respectively. Results: Of 268 participants, 135 (50.4%) have ever avoided daily activities. The most frequently reported situational avoidance was public bathroom use (32.1%), followed by job applications (24.3%) and hospital visits (12.3%). After adjusting for confounders including baseline depressive symptoms and experience of anti-transgender discrimination, participants with any situational avoidance experience were 1.30 times (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.01-1.69) more likely to have anxiety symptoms compared with those without situational avoidance experience. In particular, participants who avoided three or more kinds of daily activities were 1.40 times (95% CI = 1.02-1.93) more likely to have anxiety symptoms than those without any experience of situational avoidance. No association was observed with depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Multilateral interventions including anti-discrimination law enactment are necessary to reduce transphobia and provide support for TGNB people in Korea, thus reducing their fear of participating in daily activities and promoting their mental well-being.

Association of High Body Mass Index With Postoperative Complications After Chest Masculinization Surgery

PURPOSE

Body mass index (BMI) requirements for transgender and nonbinary patients undergoing chest masculinization surgery (CMS) are not standardized and based on small sample sizes. This is the largest and first national retrospective study to determine the association between BMI and postoperative complications.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2020 was queried for CMS patients. The primary outcome was incidence of at least one complication within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were incidence of major and minor complications. Body mass index (in kilograms per square meter) was categorized as category 0 (<30), 1 (30-34.9), 2 (35-39.9), 3 (40-44.9), 4 (45-49.9), and 5 (≥50). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between BMI and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 2317 patients, median BMI was 27.4 kg/m 2 (interquartile range, 23.4-32.2 kg/m 2 ). Body mass index range was 15.6 to 64.9 kg/m 2 . While increasing BMI was significantly associated with greater odds of at least one complication, no patients experienced severe morbidity, regardless of BMI. Patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m 2 had an adjusted odds ratio [aOR, 95% confidence interval (CI)] of 3.63 (1.02-12.85) and 36.62 (2.96->100) greater odds of at least one complication and urinary tract infection compared with nonobese patients, respectively. Patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 had an adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of 5.06 (1.5-17.04) and 5.13 (1.89-13.95) greater odds of readmission and surgical site infection compared with nonobese patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chest masculinization surgery in higher BMI patients is associated with greater odds of unplanned readmission. Given the low risk for severe complications in higher BMI individuals, we recommend re-evaluation of BMI cutoffs for CMS patients.

Debunking Myths of Gender Informed Care: What Every Pediatric Surgeon Should Know

As the transgender population in the United States grows, gender-affirming care is becoming increasingly relevant to the practice of pediatric surgery. Medical care for the transgender and gender diverse population is a politically charged topic with significant complexity and opportunities for clarification. It is important for providers to better understand this population's unique health and social needs. This review aims to debunk long-standing myths regarding gender-affirming care and highlight the current therapeutic and legislative landscapes within the scope of pediatric surgical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Transgender Men and Nonbinary Assigned Female at Birth Young Adults in the United States: a National Study

BACKGROUND

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) cause a major burden of disease in the United States (US)-especially among structurally marginalized populations, including transgender and nonbinary people, individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB), Black and Latinx/e individuals, and young adults. Although screening can help detect and prevent STIs, research on STI testing among populations at diverse intersections of multiple forms of structural marginalization, including Black, Latinx/e, and other racially/ethnically minoritized transgender men and nonbinary AFAB US young adults, is extremely scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey of transgender and nonbinary US young adults from February to July 2019. Using Poisson regression, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between race/ethnicity-which we conceptualized as a system of structural inequality that shapes individuals' and groups' exposure to racism-and lifetime and past-year STI testing among transgender men and nonbinary AFAB US young adults aged 18-30 years with at least one-lifetime sexual partner (N = 378).

RESULTS

Approximately 74% of participants had received an STI test in their lifetime, and, among those, 72% with a past-year sexual partner had been tested for an STI in the last 12 months. We observed no statistically significant association between race/ethnicity and lifetime STI testing among transgender and nonbinary AFAB young adults with a lifetime sexual partner. In contrast, Black (PR = 1.32; 95%: 1.03, 1.68) and Latinx/e (PR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.75) transgender men and nonbinary AFAB young adults who ever received an STI test and had a past-year sexual partner were significantly more likely to have received an STI test in the last 12 months relative to their White counterparts, adjusting for demographic factors. Further adjustment for lifetime STI diagnosis and health insurance status did not appreciably attenuate these observed adjusted differences; however, the adjusted difference in the prevalence of past-year STI testing between Black (but not Latinx/e) and White transgender men and nonbinary AFAB young adults was no longer statistically significant upon further adjustment for educational attainment and employment status, possibly due to small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

The higher adjusted prevalence of past-year STI testing among Black and Latinx/e compared to White transgender men and nonbinary AFAB US young adults may reflect racist and xenophobic sexual stereotypes about Black and Latinx/e people among health care providers and institutions, the history of hyper-surveillance of Black and Latinx/e people by public health institutions in the context of infectious disease containment, and/or agency and resistance among Black and Latinx/e transgender men and nonbinary AFAB young adults with regard to sexual health promotion in the face of multiple compounding systems of oppression.

Demographic factors associated with healthcare avoidance and delay in the transgender population: Findings from a systematic review

Purpose

Healthcare avoidance and delay (HAD) in the transgender population has been well documented, and research has explored a range of associated factors that help to identify those most at risk of HAD. This review addresses a gap in the research by synthesizing research exploring associations between HAD and demographic factors.

Methods

A systematic search of literature published at any time up to December 2021 was conducted, using five databases (EBSCO, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and manually searching reference lists of included studies. After exclusion of duplicates, 608 unique records were subjected to double screening. Papers reporting statistical analyses of HAD in association with any sociodemographic variables were included in this review. Papers consisted of nineteen cross-sectional studies. Narrative synthesis was used to address findings.

Results

Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, exploring HAD in association with a wide range of demographic factors, including sex and gender, social transition factors, age, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, veteran status, education, sexuality, relationship status, citizenship, place of residence, and state demographics. Findings identified intra-community demographic risk factors, with consistent evidence for increased HAD among transmasculine, and younger, participants. Lower income and higher educational attainment were also associated with increased HAD, while remaining areas had weak or little evidence for association with HAD.

Conclusion

This review expands knowledge in this area by highlighting demographic factors associated with increased HAD in research literature, and exploring how these may be further investigated to address substantial gaps in the body of research.

Contending with precarity: Digital pathways to sexual and reproductive healthcare among transgender Filipinos during the COVID-19 pandemic

Stringent lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic and the cisnormative framing of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in the Philippines cultivated precarious access to SRH systems among transgender (trans) communities during the public health crisis. With the shift toward digital health initiatives, this study aimed to explore the experiences of the local trans community in using digital health initiatives (DHIs) to access SRH care and gender-affirming services, information, and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online interviews with 13 self-identified trans Filipinos living in the Philippines during the pandemic were conducted and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. First, the narratives of trans Filipinos illustrate how DHIs can address discontinuities of care that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, because of long-standing geographic, economic, and social barriers to trans-responsive healthcare in the Philippines, local trans communities navigate alternative pathways to care established within digital spaces (e.g., social media) by trans individuals and groups. These online communities of care not only connect trans Filipinos to culturally competent and affordable care but also foster a sense of belongingness and support. Taken together, this study underscores the need to go beyond technical access to care to ensure that trans-inclusive and trans-responsive sources and providers of care are made available throughout the healthcare system. As the narratives of trans Filipinos illustrate, the narratives, experiences, and practices within their online communities of care may be the key to actualizing such a healthcare system not only in the Philippines but all over the world.

A Review of Patient Experiences and Provider Education to Improve Transgender Health Inequities in the USA

Transgender individuals are an underserved, vulnerable population. They face many inequities including barriers in both accessing and receiving adequate healthcare. These inequities are proposed here to be rooted in a lack of education about transgender people and their experiences. We begin by exploring the existing transgender healthcare research carried out in the USA, examining client experiences, provider education and attitudes, and the barriers transgender people face to obtaining proper healthcare. Secondly, we look at the previous research on educational interventions implemented with medical students and practitioners in the USA to enhance knowledge about transgender people, and increase sensitivity and awareness, while also increasing the level of comfort in working with these clients. The limitations in these fields of study are discussed in order to understand how to better serve transgender clients in the USA. We will do this through a narrative review to determine evidence-based best practices for educational intervention, uncovering gaps in the literature and highlighting where to focus in future work for researchers and practitioners.

Evidence-based sexual healthcare for the LGBTQIA2+ patient across the lifespan

ABSTRACT

People who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, asexual, two-spirit, or other minority sexual and gender identities (LGBTQIA2+) often avoid seeking healthcare due to social discrimination and stigma. Clinical education in LGBTQIA2+-affirming care is essential but often lacking across disciplines. Provider acceptance, awareness of personal biases, and understanding of microaggressions affecting LGBTQIA2+ people can improve access, outcomes, and survival for this population. Expertise in caring for LGBTQIA2+ people in rural and suburban communities, for people who are transgender, and for people who have undergone or are in the process of undergoing gender-affirming surgeries is essential to offer best-practice healthcare.

Distinguishing Gender Identity From Biological Sex in Dermatologic Health Care: Methods, Harms, and Paths Forward

Accurate assessment of gender identity and biological sex in dermatology research is crucial since their conflation or poor demarcation undermines patient respect and study accuracy. Clearer guidance is needed for health care researchers, particularly in light of the notable disparities in skin disease rates, skincare practices, literature representation, and the persistent underrepresentation of transgender and nonbinary patients.

Voices from a Multidisciplinary Healthcare Center: Understanding Barriers in Gender-Affirming Care-A Qualitative Exploration

When seeking gender-affirming care, trans* and gender-diverse individuals often describe experiencing barriers. However, a deeper understanding of what constitutes such barriers is generally lacking. The present research sought to better understand the barriers trans* and gender-diverse individuals experienced, and their effects, when seeking gender-affirming care in the Netherlands. Qualitative interviews were conducted with trans* and gender-diverse individuals who sought care at a Dutch multidisciplinary medical center. Twenty-one participants were included, of which 12 identified as (trans) male, six identified as (trans) female, one as trans*, and one as gender-nonconforming (GNC)/non-binary. The interviews were mostly conducted at the homes of the participants and lasted between 55 min and 156 min (mean = 85 min). Following data collection and transcription, the interviews were analyzed using axial coding and thematic analysis. A total of 1361 codes were extracted, which could be classified into four themes describing barriers: lack of continuity: organizational and institutional factors (n_codes = 546), patient-staff dynamics (n_codes = 480), inadequate information and support (n_codes = 210), and lack of autonomy in decision making (n_codes = 125). Within our study, trans* and gender-diverse individuals described encountering multiple and diverse barriers when seeking gender-affirming care in the Netherlands. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether individualized care, the decentralization of care, and the use of decision aids can improve the experienced barriers of trans* and gender-diverse individuals seeking gender-affirming care within the Dutch healthcare system.

Perioperative Care of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: A Biopsychosocial Approach

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people endure numerous physical and mental health disparities secondary to lifelong stigma and marginalization, which are often perpetuated in medical spaces. Despite such barriers, TGD people are seeking gender-affirming care (GAC) with increased frequency. GAC facilitates the transition from the sex assigned at birth to the affirmed gender identity and is comprised of hormone therapy (HT) and gender-affirming surgery (GAS). The anesthesia professional is uniquely poised to serve as an integral support for TGD patients within the perioperative space. To provide affirmative perioperative care to TGD patients, anesthesia professionals should understand and attend to the biological, psychological, and social dimensions of health that are relevant to this population. This review outlines the biological factors that impact the perioperative care of TGD patients, such as the management of estrogen and testosterone HT, safe use of sugammadex, interpretation of laboratory values in the context of HT, pregnancy testing, drug dosing, breast binding, altered airway and urethral anatomy after prior GAS, pain management, and other GAS considerations. Psychosocial factors are reviewed, including mental health disparities, health care provider mistrust, effective patient communication, and the interplay of these factors in the postanesthesia care unit. Finally, recommendations to improve TGD perioperative care are reviewed through an organizational approach with an emphasis on TGD-focused medical education. These factors are discussed through the lens of patient affirmation and advocacy with the intent to educate the anesthesia professional on the perioperative management of TGD patients.

Transgender Identity and Suicide Attempts and Mortality in Denmark

Importance

Prior studies have suggested that transgender individuals may be a high-risk group with respect to suicide attempt and mortality, but large-scale, population-based investigations are lacking.

Objective

To examine in a national setting whether transgender individuals have higher rates of suicide attempt and mortality than nontransgender individuals.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Nationwide, register-based, retrospective cohort study on all 6 657 456 Danish-born individuals aged 15 years or older who lived in Denmark between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2021.

Exposure

Transgender identity was determined through national hospital records and administrative records of legal change of gender.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Suicide attempts, suicide deaths, nonsuicidal deaths, and deaths by any cause during 1980 through 2021 were identified in national hospitalization and causes of death registers. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) with 95% CIs controlling for calendar period, sex assigned at birth, and age were calculated.

Results

The 6 657 456 study participants (50.0% assigned male sex at birth) were followed up during 171 023 873 person-years. Overall, 3759 individuals (0.06%; 52.5% assigned male sex at birth) were identified as transgender at a median age of 22 years (IQR, 18-31 years) and followed up during 21 404 person-years, during which 92 suicide attempts, 12 suicides, and 245 suicide-unrelated deaths occurred. Standardized suicide attempt rates per 100 000 person-years were 498 for transgender vs 71 for nontransgender individuals (aIRR, 7.7; 95% CI, 5.9-10.2). Standardized suicide mortality rates per 100 000 person-years were 75 for transgender vs 21 for nontransgender individuals (aIRR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0-6.3). Standardized suicide-unrelated mortality rates per 100 000 person-years were 2380 for transgender vs 1310 for nontransgender individuals (aIRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6-2.2), and standardized all-cause mortality rates per 100 000 person-years were 2559 for transgender vs 1331 for nontransgender individuals (aIRR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7-2.4). Despite declining rates of suicide attempts and mortality during the 42 years covered, aIRRs remained significantly elevated in recent calendar periods up to and including 2021 for suicide attempts (aIRR, 6.6; 95% CI, 4.5-9.5), suicide mortality (aIRR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-5.9), suicide-unrelated mortality (aIRR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-2.1), and all-cause mortality (aIRR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.1).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this Danish population-based, retrospective cohort study, results suggest that transgender individuals had significantly higher rates of suicide attempt, suicide mortality, suicide-unrelated mortality, and all-cause mortality compared with the nontransgender population.

A Transgender Health Information Resource: Participatory Design Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the abundance of health information on the internet for people who identify as transgender and gender diverse (TGD), much of the content used is found on social media channels, requiring individuals to vet the information for relevance and quality.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a prototype transgender health information resource (TGHIR) delivered via a mobile app to provide credible health and wellness information for people who are TGD.

METHODS

We partnered with the TGD community and used a participatory design approach that included focus groups and co-design sessions to identify users' needs and priorities. We used the Agile software development methodology to build the prototype. A medical librarian and physicians with expertise in transgender health curated a set of 97 information resources that constituted the foundational content of the prototype. To evaluate the prototype TGHIR app, we assessed the app with test users, using a single item from the System Usability Scale to assess feature usability, cognitive walk-throughs, and the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale to evaluate the app's objective and subjective quality.

RESULTS

A total of 13 people who identified as TGD or TGD allies rated their satisfaction with 9 of 10 (90%) app features as good to excellent, and 1 (10%) of the features-the ability to filter to narrow TGHIR resources-was rated as okay. The overall quality score on the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale was 4.25 out of 5 after 4 weeks of use, indicating a good-quality mobile app. The information subscore received the highest rating, at 4.75 out of 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Community partnership and participatory design were effective in the development of the TGHIR app, resulting in an information resource app with satisfactory features and overall high-quality ratings. Test users felt that the TGHIR app would be helpful for people who are TGD and their care partners.

Stressors in health care and their association to symptoms experienced by gender diverse people

OBJECTIVES

Many individuals whose gender does not align with the sex they were assigned at birth (gender diverse [GD] people) report stressful health care encounters. We examined the relationship of these stressors to symptoms of emotional distress and impaired physical functioning among GD people.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was conducted using a cross-sectional design with data from the 2015 United States Transgender Survey.

METHODS

Composite metrics of health care stressors and physical impairments were developed, and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-6) provided a measure of emotional distress. Linear and logistic regression were used to analyze the aims.

RESULTS

A total of 22,705 participants from diverse gender identity subgroups were included. Participants who experienced at least one stressor in health care during the past 12 months had more symptoms of emotional distress (β = 0.14, P < .001) and 85% greater odds of having a physical impairment (odds ratio = 1.85, P < .001). Transgender men exposed to stressors were more likely than transgender women to experience emotional distress and have a physical impairment, with other gender identity subgroups reporting less distress. Black participants exposed to stressful encounters reported more symptoms of emotional distress than White participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that stressful encounters in health care are associated with symptoms of emotional distress and greater odds of physical impairment for GD people, with transgender men and Black individuals being at greatest risk of emotional distress. The findings indicate the need for assessment of factors that contribute to discriminatory or biased health care for GD people, education of health care workers, and support for GD people to reduce their risk of stressor-related symptoms.

Barriers to oral health care for transgender and gender nonbinary populations

BACKGROUND

Despite health disparities and barriers to medical care being well documented in the literature, transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) people's experiences and expectations with regard to oral health care remain understudied. The authors examined gender identity-related factors influencing experiences in the dental setting, aspects of subjective oral health, and avoidance of oral health care.

METHODS

One-hundred eighteen TGNB people aged 13 through 70 years completed a 32-item questionnaire designed for this study. Data analysis relied on descriptive methods and bivariate comparisons using a conventional P < .05 statistical significance criterion. Qualitative description analysis was used to identify emerging themes from responses to an open-ended question.

RESULTS

One-third of participants reported misgendering (that is, had been addressed by their incorrect name and pronouns in the dental setting). Although refusal of oral health care was rare in this sample of TGNB participants, more than one-half felt that their usual source of oral health care was not equipped to provide gender-appropriate care. Participants' avoidance due to gender identity was significantly associated with measures of self-reported suboptimal oral health. Common themes related to participants' oral health care experiences included gender insensitivity, awkward interactions, avoidance of care, and lack of gender-affirming providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between TGNB patients' expectations and actual experiences suggest that their needs are often unmet in the dental setting, possibly contributing to gender identity-associated dental avoidance and oral health disparities.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Although these results need to be verified in larger and more diverse samples, they provide actionable information for improvement to this population's oral health and management.

Intersecting Sexual Behavior and Gender Identity Stigmas Among Transgender Women in the United States: Burden and Associations with Sexual Health

In the United States, a context of multiple marginalization shapes sexual health disparities experienced by transgender women. Using data from 396 transgender women with negative or unknown HIV status, we performed exploratory factor analysis on responses to gender identity and sexual behavior stigma items and regressed sexual health outcomes on extracted factors via modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. Overall, 97.2% of participants endorsed ≥ 1 gender identity stigma; 67.2% endorsed ≥ 1 sexual behavior stigma; and 66.9% endorsed ≥ 1 of each. Extracted factors included gender-identity social stigma, reflecting experiences related to family, fearfulness in public, and verbal harassment (α = 0.68); gender-identity institutional stigma/violence, reflecting experiences related to healthcare, police interactions, and interpersonal violence (α = 0.73); and global sexual behavior stigma, reflecting experiences related to family, friends, and healthcare, as well as police interactions, fearfulness in public, verbal harassment, and interpersonal violence (α = 0.83). Gender-identity social stigma was significantly, positively associated with testing for HIV and testing for sexually transmitted infections. Gender-identity institutional stigma/violence and global sexual behavior stigma were both significantly, positively associated with condomless anal sex, sex work, testing for HIV, testing for sexually transmitted infections, and use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. Stigma-mitigation remains critical to improve quality of life and sexual health for transgender women in the United States.

Provider perceptions of barriers and facilitators to care in eating disorder treatment for transgender and gender diverse patients: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of eating disorders is higher in transgender and non-binary compared to cisgender people. Gender diverse people who seek eating disorder treatment often report struggling to find affirming and inclusive treatment from healthcare clinicians. We sought to understand eating disorder care clinicians' perceptions of facilitators of and barriers to effective eating disorder treatment for transgender and gender diverse patients.

METHODS

In 2022, nineteen US-based licensed mental health clinicians who specialized in eating disorder treatment participated in semi-structured interviews. We used inductive thematic analysis to identify themes around perceptions and knowledge of facilitators and barriers to care for transgender and gender diverse patients diagnosed with eating disorders.

RESULTS

Two broad themes were identified: (1) factors affecting access to care; and (2) factors affecting care while in treatment. Within the first theme, the following subthemes were found: stigmatization, family support, financial factors, gendered clinics, scarcity of gender-competent care, and religious communities. Within the second theme, prominent subthemes included discrimination and microaggressions, provider lived experience and education, other patients and parents, institutions of higher education, family-centered care, gendered-centered care, and traditional therapeutic techniques.

CONCLUSION

Many barriers and facilitators have potential to be improved upon, especially those caused by clinicians' lack of knowledge or attitudes towards gender minority patients in treatment. Future research is needed to identify how provider-driven barriers manifest and how they can be improved upon to better patient care experiences.

Challenges of caring for transgender and gender diverse patients with rheumatic disease: presentation of seven patients and review of the literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As perspectives on sex and gender identity have evolved, there has been an increase in the practice of transgender medicine. Within rheumatology, however, there is a dearth of information about rheumatic disease in transgender and gender diverse (TGGD) individuals. This is important, as sex hormones affect the etiopathogenesis and expression of autoimmune diseases. We therefore sought to identify TGGD patients with rheumatic disease, review their clinical courses, and appraise existing literature about this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Of 1053 patients seen at the Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center from 2019 through 2021, five transgender men and two transgender women with rheumatic disease were identified. Most patients' disease courses were not overtly impacted by gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). Six of seven patients had psychosocial barriers to care. Our systematic review found 11 studies with 11 transgender women and two transgender men. In 12 of 13 patients, GAHT possibly modulated the patients' rheumatic disease.

SUMMARY

Our observations suggest GAHT need not be a strict contraindication in TGGD patients with rheumatic disease. TGGD patients often face significant psychosocial barriers. Additional information about this population and empathy toward their health disparities are needed.

Trans broken arm syndrome: A mixed-methods exploration of gender-related medical misattribution and invasive questioning

RATIONALE

Gender-related medical misattribution and invasive questioning (GRMMIQ), colloquially known as "trans broken arm syndrome," is a form of medical discrimination faced by transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients wherein a provider incorrectly assumes that a medical condition results from a patient's gender identity or medical transition. This phenomenon may take one of two forms: (1) the incorrect and explicit misattribution of gender identity or medical transition as being the cause of an acute complaint, or (2) invasive and unnecessary questions regarding a patient's gender identity or gender transition status.

OBJECTIVE

Using mixed-methods procedures, this study aims to explore the incidence, some common correlates, and manifestations of GRMMIQ.

METHODS

American TGD participants (N = 147), recruited through an online recruitment platform, completed questions assessing their experiences in the healthcare system including lifetime incidence of GRMMIQ, outness to healthcare providers, and additional experiences of gender-related discrimination in a medical setting. Participants who indicated experiences of GRMMIQ were asked open-ended questions about one such experience.

RESULTS

Nearly one-third of participants reported experiencing GRMMIQ. Experiences were associated with outness to acute care providers and other types of gender-related discrimination in healthcare settings. Analysis of qualitative data revealed four primary themes: (1) assumptions of disordered thinking and being, (2) hyperfocus on aspects of medical transition, (3) cultural ignorance and incompetence, and (4) dismissiveness of the patient.

CONCLUSION

Together, these results enhance the understanding of an underexplored aspect of medical discrimination faced by TGD individuals while highlighting commonalities across different experiences.

Stigma and Barriers in Health Care Among a Sample of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Active Duty Service Members

BACKGROUND

Transgender and/or gender-diverse (TGD) persons are vulnerable to stigma and health care inequities; however, data are particularly limited among TGD active duty military service members despite ongoing changes to service policies. TGD-related stressors may impede access to and utilization of health care due to fear of potential discrimination and distress, thereby adversely impacting military readiness.

METHODS

We examined stigma and barriers in health care and associations with physical and mental health in an online sample of 177 active duty service members who self-identified as TGD. To assess associations between stigma and barriers in health care with mental and physical health, linear regressions were conducted adjusting for age, gender identity, race, and rank.

RESULTS

Over half (65%) of the participants reported at least 1 instance of stigma and/or barrier in health care. Stigma and barriers to health care were significantly associated with greater self-reported depressive symptoms (β=0.20, P =0.03), anxiety (β=0.21, P =0.03), stress (β=0.30, P =0.001), and poorer overall mental health (β=-0.23, P =0.007), after adjusting for covariates. Nearly one-quarter of participants had not disclosed their gender identity to their primary care clinician.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggested that stigma and barriers to affirming health care were prevalent among active duty service members identifying as TGD, specifically, difficulty accessing gender-affirming care and negative assumptions from clinicians. These experiences may adversely affect mental health and impede the quality of health care received by a population already vulnerable to health inequities. Given recent changes to military policy, efforts may be warranted to improve access to timely, affirming care and clinician training.

Increasing Inclusivity and Reducing Reactance During Provider-Patient Interactions

BACKGROUND

Significant health disparities exist for trans and gender-nonconforming patients, in part caused by a reduced likelihood of seeking health care due to experienced discrimination in health care settings. Increasing inclusivity in patient-provider interactions can decrease barriers to care seeking for these patients, but such advice to providers must be simple to implement and account for potential backlash among certain patient subgroups.

METHODS

In 3 studies, we use online samples to experimentally test patient reactions to 2 methods of provider inclusivity signaling: verbal sharing of the provider's pronouns and request for the patient's pronouns (a method frequently suggested in the literature) and the provider wearing a pin indicating their pronouns without verbal sharing or requesting that the patient share their pronouns.

RESULTS

Study 1 finds that political orientation significantly moderated the effect of pronoun request on patient satisfaction with the visit, P = .003; satisfaction with the doctor, P = .003; and willingness to return to the provider, P = .007, with politically liberal participants being more satisfied and more likely to return when pronouns were requested and politically conservative participants less satisfied and less likely to return. Study 2 replicated these findings and demonstrated that such backlash among conservative participants did not occur when inclusivity was indicated via the provider wearing a pin indicating their pronouns. Study 3 showed that while pronoun pins may be subtle enough to not cause backlash, they are noticed by the target community and increase satisfaction and willingness to return among participants who identify as trans, nonbinary, and genderqueer.

LIMITATIONS

These studies were hypothetical scenario studies run online rather than field studies.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that recommendations for increasing inclusivity should account for potential negative impacts on the practice from more politically conservative patients and that more subtle methods of indicating an inclusive health care environment are likely to be more implementable for practitioners in the field while still positively affecting the target population.

HIGHLIGHTS

Increasing inclusivity in health care settings by verbally sharing and requesting pronouns can cause backlash and aggression among politically conservative patients.More subtle methods of inclusivity signaling such as providers wearing pins sharing their own pronouns do not have this type of backlash effect and increase satisfaction and willingness to return among non-cisgender patients.Recommendations for increasing inclusivity in health care settings should consider negative reactions from other patient subgroups to ensure recommendations are those providers are likely to be willing and able to implement long term.

Psychosocial challenges and coping strategies among people with minority gender and sexual identities in Zambia: health promotion and human rights implications

Background

Sexual and gender minorities face high levels of stigma, discrimination, and violence. In many countries, they are often criminalized and are at risk of mental health challenges. In Zambia, little is known about the psychosocial challenges and coping strategies of sexual and gender minorities. This study sought to explore psychosocial challenges and coping strategies among sexual and gender minority populations in Lusaka, Zambia to inform mental health and human rights promotion for this population.

Methods

The study used a qualitative phenomenological study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 16 sexual and gender minority participants (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) and four key informants. The sexual minorities included four lesbian, five gay, and three bisexual participants while the gender minorities included two transgender men and two transgender women. Interviews with gender and sexual minorities were mostly focused on the lived experiences of participants, while those of key informants focused on their work with sexual and gender minorities. Snowball strategy was used to recruit participants, while purposive sampling was used to select key informants. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was carried out with the aid of Nvivo 12 software.

Results

Psychosocial challenges included victimization in the form of threats and physical assault. Stigma and discrimination were experienced in different settings such as healthcare, the workplace, and school. Participants reported having experienced feelings of depression. Rejection from family members was experienced by those who revealed their sexual or gender minority status. Reported coping strategies included social support, self-concealment, listening to music, and substance use.

Conclusion

This study suggests that sexual and gender minorities in Zambia experience various psychosocial challenges related to their sexuality and gender identity. To assist them cope better with the obstacles they experience, improved psychosocial counseling and mental health services are needed.

Health(care) matters: where do the transgender individuals of Kashmir situate themselves?

While employing a phenomenological perspective, the present study aimed to explore the varied experiences of transgender individuals in Kashmir, concerning their health-seeking behavior, and the constraints they face while accessing healthcare resources on a day-to-day basis in their life world. Participants were recruited through the purposive and snowball sampling strategies and the sufficiency of sample size was determined by data saturation. Data were collected using face-to-face in-depth interviews and analyzed through Colaizzi's procedure of extracting recurrent themes and their interwoven relationships in qualitative research. Three main themes of awareness and the preferences for healthcare, gender identity and persistent stigmatization in care settings, and intra-community support and the resultant caregiving were prominent. Results of the study revealed that the transgender individuals in Kashmir experience inappropriate health-seeking behaviour primarily due to their unawareness regarding health, diseases and public healthcare programs/schemes, financial constraints, social exclusion, improper support and social stigma. They often prefer treating their health issues, mostly through local pharmacies or patent medicine vendors (PMVs), instead of visiting the medical professionals in the organized sector. Moreover, in many instances, they were also found to delay their decisions to seek care or simply decided to remain far from any medical intervention. As a result, the transgender individuals in Kashmir usually experience underutilization of formal healthcare services, which undermines their right to proper health and well-being.

Instability in Housing and Medical Care Access: The Inequitable Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on U.S. Transgender Populations

Purpose

To assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic has inequitably impacted key social determinants of health (SDoH), specifically employment, housing, and health care, for U.S. transgender populations.

Methods

Between April 13, 2020 and August 3, 2020, we conducted a national, cross-sectional online survey of sexual and gender minority individuals (N=870). We used logistic regression to calculate both unadjusted and adjusted odds of unemployment, homelessness/housing instability, and interruptions in medical care owing to the pandemic by gender and gender modality. Adjusted models controlled for age, race/ethnicity, and region.

Results

In adjusted models, transgender and gender diverse people had 2.12 times the odds of reporting homelessness/housing instability and 2.88 times the odds of reporting medical care interruptions compared with cisgender peers. Transgender men, women, and nonbinary people had 4.12, 3.29, and 3.48 times the adjusted odds of interruptions in medical care compared with cisgender men, respectively. We did not observe significant differences in employment.

Conclusions

Findings add empirical support to the hypothesis that socioeconomic consequences of COVID-19 are inequitably impacting transgender people. To contextualize our results and support future research in this area, we present a conceptual model of the short- and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on transgender populations using a framework of stigma as a fundamental cause of health inequities. Our findings emphasize that public health professionals must urgently consider-and intervene to address-the pandemic's SDoH-related impacts on transgender populations.

Development and Validation of the Gay-Specific Intraminority Stigma Inventory (G-SISI): Initial Evidence Underpinned by Intraminority Stress Theory

There is currently a lack of measures testing intraminority stress within gay men. Therefore, the current study sought to develop and psychometrically test the Gay-Specific Intraminority Stigma Inventory (G-SISI). Based on a content review of the literature and a panel of experts, a pool of items assessing gay men's perceived exposure to a range of discriminatory attitudes from other gay men was generated. Utilizing a randomly split sample of 1723 gay men between the ages of 19 and 79 years, an exploratory factor analysis was first performed (n = 861). The remaining unexamined data were then used to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis (n = 862). The results support a six-factor model: (1) Age Stigma, (2) Socioeconomic Stigma, (3) Gay Non-Conformity Stigma, (4) Racial Stigma, (5) Gender Expression Stigma, and (6) Body Stigma. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.90 and for the subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.85. Sociodemographic factors and measures of community involvement were differentially associated with the G-SISI subscales, providing evidence of construct validity. The findings demonstrate initial support for the dimensionality and validity of the G-SISI, which targets modifiable factors (e.g., identity-based stigma) that may increase stress and reduce community coping resources among gay men with diverse identities.

Facilitators and barriers to providing affirming care for transgender patients in primary care practices in Arkansas

PURPOSE

This study assessed factors affecting the provision of affirming-care best practices (ACBPs) for transgender individuals by primary care providers (PCPs) in a rural, southern state METHODS: We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study in 2020, including a statewide survey (phase 1) and interviews (phase 2). Surveyed PCPs (phase 1) included Medical Doctors/Doctors of Osteopathy (MDs/DOs), nurse practitioners, and 1 physician assistant. Interview participants (phase 2) included providers and staff in 6 practices throughout the state. We used an exploratory approach to data collection and performed content analysis to classify interview data into categories representing overarching themes RESULTS: Among surveyed PCPs who reported they had provided care to transgender patients (n = 35), the most common reason for providing gender-affirming medical services was "because of my ethical obligation to treat patients equally" (n = 27, 77%). The most common reason for not providing such services was because the PCPs "have not been trained/don't feel competent to provide these services" (n = 12, 34%). Interviews revealed the following themes: (1) willingness to provide "culturally competent care"; (2) continuum of accepting to affirming attitudes toward transgender individuals; (3) basic understanding of stigma and an awareness of its impact; (4) changes needed to provide "culturally competent care"; and (5) preferred clinical support strategies.

CONCLUSION

Training and education to provide ACBPs are warranted and would meet the needs of patients and providers. Facilitating telemedicine visits for transgender patients with gender-affirming care experts was a favorable implementation strategy for clinical support and is recommended to address access to affirming care.

Clinical Pharmacological Considerations in Transgender Medicine

Transgender medicine is a growing clinical field. Hormone therapy (testosterone or estrogen treatment) is part of the standard of gender-affirming medical care, yet clinical pharmacological knowledge in transgender medicine is lacking. Herein, we summarize available clinical and pharmacologic data for hormone therapy among transgender and gender diverse people.

Exploring the intersectionality of stigma and substance use help-seeking behaviours among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning or otherwise gender or sexuality minority (LGBTQ+) individuals in the United States: A scoping review

Problematic substance use (SU) is a significant issue among LGBTQ+ individuals, but rates of treatment/help-seeking in this population remain low. This review aimed to investigate literature about intersectional stigma of SU and LGBTQ+ identity and its impact on SU help-seeking behaviours in the U.S. Eligible studies from eight-database were included if peer-reviewed, in English, from the U.S., published between 2000 and 2022, focused on SU, stigma, SU help-seeking behaviours, among LGBTQ+ adults. Of 458 search results, 50 underwent full-text review, 12 were included in the final sample. Minority Stress Theory emerged as a relevant theoretical framework. Findings revealed that increased SU as a coping strategy was associated with minority stress. Intersectional stigma negatively impacted SU treatment experience among LGBTQ+ individuals, leading to avoidance of help-seeking or poor treatment outcomes. Patterns of SU and impact of stigma among LGBTQ+ individuals differ, wherein bisexual and transgender individuals reported significantly more treatment barriers and unique stressors. LGBTQ+ individuals reported earlier age of SU onset and were more likely to encounter opportunities for SU. This review highlights the impact of intersectional stigma on SU help-seeking behaviour among LGBTQ+ individuals in the U.S. Recommendations are provided for future clinical practice, research, and policy to better support LGBTQ+ individuals.

Caring for Transgender People in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study with Hospital Staff in Croatia

Transgender and gender-diverse people have greater health risks due to increased social stress and face a disadvantaged position in the healthcare system as a result of the stigma associated with their gender identity. Due to the lack of research in Croatia on the position of transgender people in the healthcare system, this research was intended to supplement the knowledge about the experiences of hospital staff in the Croatian healthcare system when caring for patients with transgender identities. Qualitative research was conducted using an interview method. The participants (n = 10) were healthcare managers or hospital care team members. The collected data were processed through thematic analysis. The results show that some participants had had no encounters with transgender patients and those who had described them as unproblematic or had only encountered them at a level of basic healthcare. They also described how they perceive transgender people and their life circumstances. The participants described how they envision potential encounters with this group of patients and what they consider necessary to improve the position of this group within the healthcare system. In the discussion part of the article, we assess the need for additional training regarding hospital staff, especially in terms of diversity competence, and for an increase in the visibility of transgender patients.

Sociodemographic factors and perceived patient-provider communication associated with healthcare avoidance among women with psychological distress

Objective

To establish the extent to which psychological distress influences health avoidance behavior among women, controlling for patient provider communication and sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods

Data from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, Cycle 3) was analyzed to obtain healthcare avoidance behavior among women aged 18 and older (n = 2788). Weighted descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression models were conducted.

Results

Approximately 649 women or 1 in 4 women (26.7% weighted prevalence; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.23%-0.29%) avoided healthcare in the past 12 months. Non-Hispanic white (62.8%) and married (55.4%) women represented a higher proportion of the sample. Bivariate analysis revealed that the odds of reporting healthcare avoidance among women with mild, moderate, and severe psychological distress (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.45-3.53, p = 0.001; OR: 3.88, 95% CI: 2.29-6.56, p < 0.001; OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.81-5.23, p < 0.001) was significantly higher compared to those with none-minimal psychological distress. In the adjusted model, women with moderate and severe psychological distress (Adjusted OR [AOR]:3.15, 95% CI: 1.55-6.38, p = 0.002; AOR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.10-4.92, p = 0.044) were more likely to report healthcare avoidance than those experiencing none-minimal psychological distress. Furthermore, increasing patient-provider communication score (AOR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.87-0.96, p < 0.001) reduced the likelihood of healthcare avoidance. Among the sociodemographic variables assessed, being younger (18-49 years) and having less than a high school degree significantly increased the chances of avoiding healthcare.

Conclusion

A high proportion of women with psychological distress avoid necessary healthcare. Patient-provider communication quality, increasing age, and being a high school student contribute to healthcare avoidance in women.

Innovation

Strategies to improve health service utilization must address healthcare avoidance by developing effective health communication targeted at women with psychological distress.

Training clinicians in culturally relevant care: a curriculum to improve knowledge and comfort with the transgender and gender diverse population

PURPOSE

To design a replicable simulation curriculum collaboratively with the transgender and gender diverse community to improve clinician knowledge and comfort with providing reproductive care to this population.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single arm pre-post analysis of obstetrics and gynecology residents at a single academic institution after completion of a novel simulation curriculum. The primary outcome was the change in resident comfort and knowledge in providing transgender and gender diverse patient care. A thematic analysis of learner and standardized patient free text responses was analyzed for insights on perceived learner experiences.

RESULTS

This curriculum was created with iterative feedback from the transgender community and involved only transgender and gender diverse-identified standardized patients. Thirty residents participated, with 22 responding to both the pre-and post-curriculum surveys, and 11 responding to a 6-month post-curriculum survey. There were significant improvements in learner comfort and knowledge after participation that were found to persist at 6 months. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that this was a positive and powerful learning experience for both residents and standardized patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation curriculum may be an effective and impactful tool to increase trainee comfort and knowledge of transgender and gender diverse patient care, which is important given the lack of physician training in the care for these individuals. By building the foundation with resident learners, the ultimate goal is to enhance the pool of clinicians confident and capable of caring for transgender and gender diverse patients, to increase access to care, and to improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Learning with experts: Incorporating community into gender-diverse healthcare education

The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) encourages but does not require medical schools to train students on LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, etc.…) care and education on transgender, gender-diverse and/or intersex care is particularly lacking. This study evaluated the efficacy of a patient-centred educational intervention co-developed and facilitated with transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patient collaborators on students' knowledge of TGD healthcare needs, perceived value of TGD healthcare training and TGD healthcare competency. The authors recruited second-year medical students from the Primary Care, Family and Community Medicine Clerkship at the University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School (UT Dell Med) in Spring 2021. Students (n = 36) completed an online survey with closed- and open-ended questions that included AAMC TGD healthcare competencies, perceived value of TGD healthcare training, and knowledge of TGD healthcare needs before and after an educational intervention utilising clinical cases developed and delivered in collaboration with six TGD patient collaborators. The TGD patient collaborators completed a post-intervention survey evaluating the patient-centredness of the educational intervention's design and implementation and their perception of the student's competence during the intervention. There was a statistically significant increase in each AAMC TGD healthcare competency post-intervention, except for discussing sexual health practices. No changes in perceived value or knowledge were noted. Students reported that authentic engagement with TGD patient collaborators during the educational intervention had the most impact (n = 10, 58.4%). All responding TGD patient collaborators (n = 5, 100%) strongly agreed that their input was valued and at least somewhat agreed that they felt supported by the organiser of the educational intervention. Three respondents (75%) somewhat agreed that the development of the educational intervention was a collaborative process, with one (25%) somewhat disagreeing. Educational interventions that are co-developed with TGD patient collaborators may improve medical student understanding of gender diversity. Additional efforts are needed to further the patient-centredness of educational interventions.

Utilization of Recommended Preventive Health Screenings Between Transgender and Cisgender Older Adults in Sexual and Gender Minority Communities

ObjectivesTransgender older adults are among the most health disparate populations in the United States; they also face some of the most significant barriers in accessing high quality, affordable, preventive healthcare services. We compare utilization rates of eight recommended preventive health screenings for adults aged 50 and older, by gender identity. Methods: We analyzed data from 2514 lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults aged 50 and older, testing associations between gender identities and screening service utilizations by applying a series of multivariate logistic regression analyses, controlling for sociodemographics. Results: Compared to cisgender LGB participants, transgender participants had significantly lower odds to have met four of the recommended screenings. Transgender men had significantly lower odds than transgender women to have met two of the recommended screenings. Discussion: Increasing transgender older adults' access to preventative health screening tests is critical to reduce the health burden in this aging population.

The Fall of the Nation's First Gender-Affirming Surgery Clinic

Johns Hopkins Hospital established the first gender-affirming surgery (GAS) clinic in the United States in 1966. Operating for more than 13 years, the clinic was abruptly closed in 1979. According to the hospital, the decision was made in response to objective evidence claiming that GAS was ineffective. However, this evidence directly contradicted many contemporaneous studies and faced immediate criticism from the scientific community. Despite this resistance, it took the hospital nearly 40 years to resume performing GAS. Scientific evidence-imbued in scandal, bias, and moralism-was instrumentalized to serve broader institutional interests. The burgeoning field of plastic surgery tethered and then untethered GAS from its auspices in response to poor technical outcomes and transphobia. No longer serving surgeons' interests, the clinic was marginalized to "barely minimal facilities" in 1974, five years before GAS was formally banned. Over the next 5 years, the clinic co-inhabited space with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Simultaneously, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology navigated scandals related to reproductive technology (namely, the Dalkon Shield [A.H. Robins] controversy) until the clinic space was demolished in 1979. The study that informed the GAS ban was preferentially funded in keeping with the political economy of biomedical research. This article presents a spatial argument for how the closure of the nation's first GAS clinic was not based in empirical data alone but was manipulated to fuel political and institutional agendas.

Binary and Nonbinary Transgender Adolescents' Healthcare Experiences, Avoidance, and Well Visits

PURPOSE

To explore differences in healthcare experiences, healthcare avoidance, and well visit attendance between binary and nonbinary transgender adolescents; also, to explore the association between distinct healthcare experiences and healthcare avoidance and well visits.

METHODS

We surveyed transgender adolescents ages 12-26 (n = 156) recruited from a multidisciplinary gender clinic from July through November 2018. Differences in distinct healthcare experiences by demographics were assessed using multivariable linear regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine independent associations between demographics and lifetime healthcare avoidance and past-year well visit and also, associations between distinct healthcare experiences and lifetime healthcare avoidance and past-year well visit.

RESULTS

Compared to transfeminine adolescents, more non-affirming healthcare experiences were reported by nonbinary (β = 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49, 2.33) and transmasculine adolescents (β = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.02, 1.53). Gender-affirming healthcare experiences did not differ by demographics. Transmasculine adolescents had over three times the odds of lifetime healthcare avoidance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.41, 9.08) than transfeminine peers. Only younger age was associated with past-year well visit (aOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.44, 10.17). Non-affirming healthcare experiences were positively associated with healthcare avoidance (aOR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.34). Gender-affirming healthcare experiences were not associated with healthcare avoidance or past-year well visit.

DISCUSSION

Nonbinary and transmasculine adolescents experienced more non-affirming healthcare experiences than transfeminine adolescents. Non-affirming healthcare experiences were associated with healthcare avoidance, which was disproportionately more prevalent among transmasculine adolescents. Providers must be better equipped to provide inclusive, gender-affirming care to increase receipt of care for transgender adolescents beyond specialized gender clinics.

They "Don't Know How to Deal with People Like Me": Assessing Health Care Experiences of Gender Minorities in Indiana

Purpose

Within the LGBTQ+ community, the transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) population experience a disproportionate amount of discrimination when seeking health care. Such disparities may arise from lack of proper medical training and resources for providers or biases. In this study, we examine the health care experiences of TGNB individuals living in Southern Indiana.

Methods

We analyzed responses from TGNB respondents to an LGBTQ+ health care needs assessment survey in Southern Indiana. Respondents were asked about demographic data, their self-assessed health status, quality of health care received, whether they have a provider with whom they feel comfortable sharing their gender identity with, and if they have to commute to see their provider. Finally, respondents were asked an open-ended question about their health care experiences while living in Southern Indiana. Responses were coded and several themes emerged and were analyzed.

Results

Eighty-five TGNB individuals completed our survey. Less than half of respondents indicated that they had an LGBTQ+-welcoming provider (44.7%). Individuals with an LGBTQ+-welcoming provider were more likely to report their self-assessed health as excellent/good (p=0.02) and quality of health as excellent/very good (p=0.03) compared to individuals without an LGBTQ+-welcoming provider. Five themes emerged from the write-in responses (n=64): discrimination (34.4%), invalidation (32.8%), distrust (28.1%), logistic concerns (35.9%), and positive experiences (35.9%).

Conclusion

The TGNB community living in Southern Indiana reports numerous barriers related to provider attitudes when obtaining health care. Additional training is needed to address provider biases and improve LGBTQ+ community health disparities.

Genitourinary and Sexual Symptoms and Treatments in Transfeminine Individuals: A Qualitative Exploration of Patients' Needs

Introduction

Medical providers may not be familiar with the genitourinary and sexual symptoms of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals. This lack of familiarity may hinder a provider's ability to address these issues as patients may hesitate to report symptoms due to fear of stigma, misgendering, and being treated disrespectfully.

Aim

To describe the array of genitourinary and sexual symptoms in transfeminine individuals.

Methods

Upon institutional review board approval, researchers used semi-structured interviews with 25 transfeminine individuals assigned male at birth to explore urinary and sexual symptoms on a sample of convenience. Participants were recruited and interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Two research assistants independently coded all de-identified transcripts and resolved discrepancies.

Outcomes

Thematic codes pertaining to genitourinary and sexual symptoms were defined and assessed in this study.

Results

Some genitourinary symptoms unrelated to hormone therapy or genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS) included frequency, urgency, nocturia, and incontinence, while those attributed to GGAS included slow stream, spraying, and retention. Sexual symptoms unrelated to hormone therapy or GGAS included sexually transmitted infections, erectile dysfunction, and low libido. Sexual symptoms related to GGAS included delayed ejaculation, penile pain, scar tissue pain, and pain with receptive vaginal penetration.

Clinical Implications

Increased provider awareness of and accountability for the treatment of genital and sexual symptoms of transfeminine individuals.

Strengths and Limitations

Open-ended questions were used to generate a range of responses and perspectives through conversation instead of quantifiable data. Findings are not applicable to all TGNB people since participants were limited to transfeminine adults assigned male at birth only. Recruitment was limited by the sensitive nature of the topic and hard-to-reach populations and relied on convenience through flyers and a chain-referral sampling approach.

Conclusion

Transfeminine individuals experience a wide array of genitourinary and sexual symptoms both similar and different to their cis gender counterparts.

Chung PH, Swaminathan V, Spigner S, et al. Genitourinary and Sexual Symptoms and Treatments in Transfeminine Individuals: A Qualitative Exploration of Patients’ Needs. Sex Med 2022;10:100566.

Improving menstrual equity in the USA: perspectives from trans and non-binary people assigned female at birth and health care providers

Menstruation research has largely focused on addressing menstrual management barriers facing cisgender women and girls in low and middle-income countries. Scant literature has assessed the menstrual management needs of trans and non-binary people assigned female at birth. To better understand these frequently invisibilised menstruation-related needs, we conducted a multi-method qualitative study in New York City which included: 17 in-depth interviews across trans and non-binary people (n = 10) and health care providers who serve them (n = 7); and seven anonymous post-interview participatory writing responses with trans and non-binary participants to further elucidate their lived experiences with menstrual management. Lack of health care provider transgender competency, public toilet design (i.e. gaps in cubicle doors and lack of in-cubicle menstrual product disposal bins), and the social dynamics of public toilets (i.e. work and school) were identified as significant barriers to managing menstruation safely and accessibly for trans and non-binary people. These findings have important implications for healthcare policy, public toilet legislation and advancing menstrual equity in the USA.

Interdisciplinary clinicians' attitudes, challenges, and success strategies in providing care to transgender people: a qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Access to clinicians competent in transgender health remains a significant barrier and contributor toward health inequity for transgender people. Studies on access and barriers to care have predominantly evaluated transgender patients' perceptions, but scant research has included the perspectives of clinicians.

AIMS

We conducted a qualitative study to explore how clinicians (meaning physicians and advanced practice providers, in this paper) in the United States: (1) attain and utilize information, (2) perceive barriers and facilitators, and (3) understood gaps in their professional training, in regard to practicing transgender health care.

METHODS

A Qualitative Descriptive approach guided our conventional content analysis of field notes and interviews with clinicians within a parent study that explored health care access among transgender adults. Transcripts were coded into meaning units that were iteratively abstracted into themes. Standard measures were performed to promote the trustworthiness of the analysis and reduce bias.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 13) consisted of physicians (n = 8), physician assistants (n = 3), and nurse practitioners (n = 2). The majority were women (n = 11), identified as White (n = 9), cisgender (n = 13), and ages ranged from 31 - 58 years. Five main themes were identified: (1) Knowledge Acquisition: Formal and Informal Pathways to Competency; (2) Perceived Challenges and Barriers: I didn't know what I was doing; (3) Power to Deny: Prescriptive Authority and Gatekeeping; (4) Stigma: This is really strange, and I can't really understand it; (5) Reflections: Strategies for Success, Rewards, and Personal Motivations.

DISCUSSION

Clinicians gained a sense of comfort and competence with mentorship, self-directed learning, clinical experience, and person-centered, harm-reduction approaches. Stigma, bias, and structural-level factors were barriers to providing care. This study offers a unique perspective of clinicians' motivations and strategies for providing gender-affirming care and elucidates how stigma impacts the delivery of gender-affirming care.