Carer informants for dementia sufferers: carer awareness of cognitive impairment in an elderly community-resident sample

Validation of the Korean Quick Dementia Rating System (K-QDRS)

BACKGROUND

The Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) is a brief and rapid dementia staging tool that does not require a trained rater.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the validity, reliability, and diagnostic usefulness of the Korean version of the QDRS (K-QDRS).

METHODS

We collected a total of 411 subject-informant dyads including cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 22), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 198), and dementia (n = 191). The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), Korean version of instrumental activity of daily living (K-IADL), Short Form of the Geriatric Depression Scale, Caregiver-Administered Neuropsychiatric Inventory (CGA-NPI), and detailed neuropsychological tests were administered as gold standards of dementia staging, cognition, function, mood, and behavior.

RESULTS

Internal consistency of the K-QDRS was excellent with Cronbach's alpha of 0.933. Concurrent validity was also satisfactory, with the K-QDRS correlating highly with the CDR Sum of Boxes (Pearson's r = 0.791), K-MMSE (Pearson's r = -0.518), K-IADL (Pearson's r = 0.727), and CGA-NPI (Pearson's r = 0.700). The K-QDRS was highly correlated with the global CDR, K-IADL, and CGA-NPI. We suggested two types of comparisons (for initial diagnosis and for follow-up evaluation). The cutoff scores for follow-up were 1.0 for MCI, 3.5 for very mild dementia, 6.5 for mild dementia, and 11.0 for moderate dementia.

CONCLUSION

The K-QDRS is a valid and reliable dementia rating questionnaire and can be used, briefly and rapidly, in various settings like clinical practices, longitudinal cohort studies, and community primary care.

The Causes and Impact of Crisis for People with Parkinson's Disease: A Patient and Carer Perspective

BACKGROUND

The reasons for acute hospital admissions among people with Parkinson's disease are well documented. However, understanding of crises that are managed in the community is comparatively lacking. Most existing literature on the causes of crisis for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) uses hospital data and excludes the individual's own perspective on the crisis trigger and the impact of the crisis on their care needs.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the causes and impact of crises in both community and hospital settings, from a patient and carer perspective.

METHODS

A total of 550 UK-based PwP and carers completed a survey on (a) their own personal experiences of crisis, and (b) their general awareness of potential crisis triggers for PwP.

RESULTS

In addition to well-recognised causes of crisis such as falls, events less widely associated with crisis were identified, including difficulties with activities of daily living and carer absence. The less-recognised crisis triggers tended to be managed more frequently in the community. Many of these community-based crises had a greater impact on care needs than the better-known causes of crisis that more frequently required hospital care. PwP and carer responses indicated a good general knowledge of potential crisis triggers. PwP were more aware of mental health issues and carers were more aware of cognitive impairment and issues with medications.

CONCLUSION

These findings could improve care of Parkinson's by increasing understanding of crisis events from the patient and carer perspective, identifying under-recognised crisis triggers, and informing strategies for best recording symptoms from PwP and carers.

Many caregivers of persons with memory loss or Alzheimer's disease are unaware of the abilities of their persons with AD to recall their drugs and medical histories

BACKGROUND

Caregiver awareness of the abilities of those they care for has much practical importance, especially from the safety standpoint.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the caregivers of persons with memory impairment or Alzheimer's disease know if their persons are able to recall their own drugs and medical histories.

METHOD

Persons with prodromal or probable AD (persons with AD) and their caregivers who were visiting our medical school's neurology and internal medicine clinics for routine follow-up care were recruited on the days of their appointments. Sixty-four caregiver-person with AD dyads were recruited. We first asked the caregivers to predict the ability of their persons with AD to answer questions about their drugs and medical histories. We then asked the persons with AD the questions to determine the accuracy of their caregivers' predictions.

RESULTS

Considering the caregivers of those with Mini-Mental State Exam scores ≥24, 41% incorrectly predicted whether their persons with AD could recall the number of drugs they were taking, 24% incorrectly predicted whether they could recall the names of the drugs, and 34% incorrectly predicted whether they could recall why they were taking the drugs. Most of the caregivers' errors were overestimations. As expected, the persons with AD themselves had much difficulty in answering the questions; only 30% could recall the number of drugs they were taking, only 14% could recall the names of the drugs, and only 16% could recall why they were taking the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Many caregivers of persons with memory impairment or AD are unaware of their persons' inability to recall their drugs and medical histories. Particularly concerning is the relatively high frequency of caregiver overestimations of the abilities of their persons with AD, which highlights a safety concern and presents an opportunity for caregiver education.

Patient- and Caregiver-Related Factors Associated with Caregiver Assessed Global Deterioration Scale Scoring in Demented Patients

Background

Informant-based rating scales are widely used in dementia but patients' and caregivers' features influence the final scoring. We aimed to evaluate the role of patient- and caregiver-related factors in a caregiver rated Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score in a sample of Greek patients with dementia.

Methods

We included 194 patients with dementia and 194 caregivers/family relatives; Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI); Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) were administered to (a) patients and Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale; Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) to (b) caregivers. Participants' demographics and patients' and caregivers' characteristics were entered into a 3-block regression analysis.

Results

The final model explained 55% of the total variance of the caregiver assessed GDS score. The following variables significantly contributed to the final model: MMSE (β=-0.524); K-IADL (β=-0.264); ZBI (β=0.145).

Conclusion

We herein confirm the contribution of patients' cognitive and functional status and caregivers' burden in caregiver rated GDS scoring irrespective of demographic-related characteristics.

Factors associated with informant-reported cognitive decline in older adults: A systemised literature review

Background

Dementia diagnoses are typically made where there is a significant, progressive decline in cognitive functioning. Evidence of such decline is increasingly established through information provided by informants. However, some studies demonstrate that informant reports may not always be accurate and may be biased by extraneous factors. This review aimed to elucidate factors that have been identified as potentially having some influence on informant reports of cognitive decline.

Method

A search of PsychInfo, ASSIA, PubMed and Web of Science databases identified 13 peer-reviewed studies that met criteria for inclusion in the review.

Results

Reviewed studies provide some evidence for associations between informant-reported cognitive decline and demographic characteristics (patient age, education, ethnicity and informant gender), clinical factors (dementia severity, diagnosis, behavioural disturbance, everyday functioning) and psychological factors (patient depressive symptoms and neuroticism, informant psychological distress and burden). Several methodological limitations of the evidence base were identified.

Conclusion

Findings suggest that informant-reported cognitive decline may not always be wholly reliable in that information holds potential to be influenced by both patient and informant characteristics. Clinical and empirical implications are discussed.

Increased Reporting Accuracy of Alzheimer Disease Symptoms in Caribbean Hispanic Informants

INTRODUCTION

Informant report of symptoms is essential for diagnosing and characterizing Alzheimer disease (AD). Differences in the perception and experience of dementia across ethnicities may influence informant report. Understanding such differences is critical given that among those with AD, Hispanics are disproportionately affected.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses examined informant report of cognitive and functional symptoms in mild AD across white (n=107) and Caribbean Hispanic (n=71) informants. To explore its accuracy, informant report of symptoms was compared against objective measures of patient performance.

RESULTS

Adjusted analyses revealed Hispanics reported more symptoms than white informants. Informant report of symptoms was inversely correlated with patients' global cognition in both ethnic groups. Only Hispanic report of symptoms was significantly associated with memory and language performance.

DISCUSSION

Informant report of symptoms was associated with patients' global cognition, reflecting relatively accurate informant reports in both ethnic groups, and was stronger in Hispanics when examining memory and language. Such differences may reflect cultural caregiving practices and perceptions of dementia, having implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Detection and Management of Preexisting Cognitive Impairment in the Critical Care Unit

Older adults account for half of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and ICU days, and approximately 2 in 5 older adults in the ICU have preexisting cognitive impairment (PCI). PCI identification is important for risk stratification and may influence ICU utilization and decision-making surrogacy. PCI is overlooked in more than half of patients without screening; however, screening instruments can identify PCI in less than 5 minutes. Management of PCI in the ICU involves addressing associated neuropsychiatric symptoms. Nonpharmacological interventions should be considered the mainstay of treatment; psychotropics may be considered, although available data on their efficacy is limited.

Patient-rated versus proxy-rated cognitive and functional measures in older adults

OBJECTIVES

Patients with cognitive impairment may have difficulty reporting their functional and cognitive abilities, which are important clinical outcomes. Health care proxies may be able to corroborate patient self-reports. Several studies reported discrepancy between patient and proxy ratings, though the literature is sparse on changes over time of these ratings. Our goals in this 12-month study were to compare patient and proxy reports on functioning, cognition, and everyday executive function, and to further elucidate correlates of patient-proxy discrepancy.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of individuals older than 70 years who ranged from having no cognitive impairment to having moderate dementia who had a proxy available to complete instruments at baseline (N=76). Measurements included Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADLI), Neuro-QOL Executive Function, PROMIS Applied Cognition (PROMIS-Cog), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Patient- and proxy-rated ADCS-ADLI were correlated at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Patient and proxy ratings were discrepant on Neuro-QOL Executive Function and PROMIS-Cog. Greater patient-proxy discrepancy on PROMIS-Cog was associated with younger age and less depression, and greater patient-proxy discrepancy on Neuro-QOL Executive Function was associated with less depression and worse cognitive impairment. Patient-proxy discrepancy increased over time for everyday executive function. Changes in proxy-rated but not patient-rated ADCS-ADLI correlated with MMSE changes.

CONCLUSION

Patients and proxies generally agree in reporting on activities of daily living. Patient and proxy reports differ in their respective evaluation of cognitive functioning and everyday executive function. Ratings from both sources may be preferred for these two domains, though studies using gold standard measures are necessary. It is important that clinicians are aware of the differences between patient and proxy perspective to create an accurate clinical picture and guide treatment.

Frequency and impact of informant replacement in Alzheimer disease research

Informants serve an essential role in Alzheimer disease research. Were an informant to be replaced during a longitudinal study, this could have negative implications. We used data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set to examine the frequency of informant replacement among Alzheimer disease dementia participants, whether patient and informant characteristics were associated with replacement, and how replacement affected research outcome measures. Informant replacement was common (15.5%) and typically occurred after the first or the second research visit. Adult child (24%) and other (38%) informants were more frequently replaced than spouse informants (10%). Older spouse informant age and younger adult child informant age were associated with replacement. The between-visit change in Functional Assessment Questionnaire scores was greater in patients who replaced informants than in those with stable informants. Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Functional Assessment Questionnaire, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores showed greater variability in between-visit change in patients who replaced informants compared with those with stable informants. These findings suggest that informant replacement is relatively common, may have implications to study analyses, and warrant further examination in the setting of clinical trials.

Epistemological Issues in the Study of Insight in People with Alzheimer’s Disease

Epistemological challenges that attend the study of the degree to which people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) manifest insight into their deficits are explored in terms of (1) the social dynamics of the situations that those afflicted confront in the process; (2) issues surrounding the use of discrepancy scores and interviews with those afflicted and their caregivers; and (3) problems surrounding the sorts of inferences that are made through the use of statistics in group studies. It is recommended that an understanding of and sensitivity to the personhood of the afflicted individual is of paramount import in interpreting his or her behavior in such situations, and that ignoring the individuality of those afflicted and their scores on assessment instruments in favor of statistical analysis of group data can result in grievous errors of interpretation of that data. Case examples are provided to underscore these points.

Burden of Care and Patient's Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Influence Carer's Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore what effects the carer's burden and patient's neuropsychiatric symptoms have on carer's report on patient's cognitive functioning and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

METHODS

We included 1,832 patients, 742 with mild cognitive impairment and 1,090 with dementia [mean age 75.2 years (SD 9.5), 56% women]. The following scales were used: Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), Lawton and Brody IADL Scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), Relatives' Stress Scale (RSS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Clock Drawing Test (CDT). Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to explore which factors were associated with IQCODE and IADL.

RESULTS

Spouses scored lower on the IQCODE compared with non-spouses in spite of equivalent MMSE and CDT scores. In a multiple linear regression analysis using IQCODE as a dependent variable, beta for MMSE was -0.368 (p < 0.001) adjusted for demographic factors. After adjusting also for RSS and NPI-Q, MMSE beta was -0.279 (p < 0.001), RSS beta 0.294 (p < 0.001), and NPI beta 0.237 (p < 0.001). Similar results were found using IADL as the dependent variable.

CONCLUSION

Carer's burden and neuropsychiatric symptoms of the patient are important biasing factors when carers report on cognitive function and IADL.

Awareness of executive deficits in people with Parkinson's disease

Executive functioning is frequently impaired among people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Little is known about awareness of executive functioning, in the sense of being able to accurately appraise functioning or performance, in people with PD, or about whether awareness is particularly affected in those who have impaired executive functioning. This study explored awareness of executive functioning at the levels of evaluative judgment (comparison of self- and informant ratings of executive functioning), and performance monitoring (comparison of performance on cognitive tests and self-ratings of that performance). Awareness levels were assessed in people with PD with and without executive deficits, and in healthy controls. When the level of agreement between self- and informant ratings was considered, people with PD in both groups appeared as accurate in evaluating their overall executive functioning as healthy controls. When appraising their performance as the specific tasks were completed, people with PD who had impairments in executive functioning appeared less accurate than controls and people with PD without executive impairments. People with PD who have executive deficits may lack the ability to recognize their limitations while performing specific tasks, which may have implications for their functional abilities.

Comparing reports from hip-fracture patients and their proxies: implications on evaluating sex differences in disability and depressive symptoms

OBJECTIVE

This study compared sex differences in disability and depressive symptoms using reports from hip fracture patients and their proxies.

METHOD

Hip fracture patients (49 men, 183 women) aged ≥65 years and proxies were interviewed 1 year postfracture. Outcomes were Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) and number of dependencies in performing activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Mean ADL sex differences (men minus women) were 0.40 (p = .37) using proxy reports and 0.70 (p = .08) using patient self-reports. Mean CES-D sex differences were -3.60 (p = .02) using proxy reports and -1.26 (p = .38) using patient self-reports. Discrepancies between patients and proxies were smallest for proxies who have lived with the patient ≥ 1 year.

DISCUSSION

Patients and proxies produced conflicting conclusions about sex differences. Results suggest that ideal proxies to recruit are those who have been cohabitating with the patients for an extended length of time.

Days of delirium are associated with 1-year mortality in an older intensive care unit population

RATIONALE

Delirium is a frequent occurrence in older intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but the importance of the duration of delirium in contributing to adverse long-term outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association of the number of days of ICU delirium with mortality in an older patient population.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in a 14-bed ICU in an urban acute care hospital. The patient population comprised 304 consecutive admissions 60 years of age and older.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The main outcome was 1-year mortality after ICU admission. Patients were assessed daily for delirium with the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and a validated chart review method. The median duration of ICU delirium was 3 days (range, 1-46 d). During the follow-up period, 153 (50%) patients died. After adjusting for relevant covariates, including age, severity of illness, comorbid conditions, psychoactive medication use, and baseline cognitive and functional status, the number of days of ICU delirium was significantly associated with time to death within 1 year post-ICU admission (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Number of days of ICU delirium was associated with higher 1-year mortality after adjustment for relevant covariates in an older ICU population. Investigations should be undertaken to reduce the number of days of ICU delirium and to study the impact of this reduction on important health outcomes, including mortality and functional and cognitive status.

Benzodiazepine and opioid use and the duration of intensive care unit delirium in an older population

OBJECTIVE

There is a high prevalence of delirium in older medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients and delirium is associated with adverse outcomes. We need to identify modifiable risk factors for delirium, such as medication use, in the ICU. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of benzodiazepine or opioid use on the duration of ICU delirium in an older medical population.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Fourteen-bed medical intensive care unit in an urban university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

304 consecutive admissions age 60 and older.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The main outcome measure was duration of ICU delirium, specifically the first episode of ICU delirium. Patients were assessed daily for delirium with the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and a validated chart review method. Our main predictor was receiving benzodiazepines or opioids during ICU stay. A multivariable model was developed using Poisson rate regression.

RESULTS

Delirium occurred in 239 of 304 patients (79%). The median duration of ICU delirium was 3 days with a range of 1-33 days. In a multivariable regression model, receipt of a benzodiazepine or opioid (rate ratio [RR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.10) was associated with increased delirium duration. Other variables associated with delirium duration in this analysis include preexisting dementia (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.33), receipt of haloperidol (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.21-1.50), and severity of illness (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of benzodiazepines or opioids in the ICU is associated with longer duration of a first episode of delirium. Receipt of these medications may represent modifiable risk factors for delirium. Clinicians caring for ICU patients should carefully evaluate the need for benzodiazepines, opioids, and haloperidol.

Approaches to the assessment of awareness: conceptual issues

Recent interest in the empirical exploration of patients' awareness in relation to their clinical states has resulted in a range of approaches taken to evaluate such awareness. These approaches vary in terms of the bases on which awareness is determined and rated, the contents of the measures used, the level of detail and complexity of judgements required, etc. The approaches use different definitions and objects of awareness and hence give rise to different (and on occasions divergent) awareness phenomena. Such differences help to explain both the contradictory nature of published results and the difficulties involved in generalising from them. In practical terms, these differences should encourage the development of management and rehabilitation strategies that are individual to specific phenomena of awareness.

Validation analysis of informant's ratings of cognitive function in African Americans and Nigerians

OBJECTIVES

To examine informant validity using the Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D') both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures and to explore the effects of informants and study participants' characteristics on the validity of informants' reports.

METHODS

Elderly African Americans age 65 years and older residing in Indianapolis, USA and elderly Yoruba Nigerians age 65 years and older residing in Ibadan, Nigeria were assessed on cognitive functioning using the CSI 'D' at baseline (1992-1993) and five-year follow-up (1997-1998). At baseline, the informant validity in both samples was evaluated against participants' cognitive tests using Pearson correlation and regular regression models. At follow-up, informants ratings on cognitive decline were assessed against participants' cognitive decline scores from baseline to follow-up using biserial correlation and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

At baseline, informants' reports on cognitive functioning significantly correlated with cognitive scores in both samples (Indianapolis:r = -0.43, p < 0.001; Ibadan:r = -0.47, p < 0.001). The participant-informant relationships significantly affected the informants' reports in the two samples with different patterns (p = 0.005 for Indianapolis and p < 0.001 for Ibadan) at a given level of cognitive functioning. African Americans spouses reported more cognitive problems, while siblings reported more problems for the Yoruba Nigerians. At follow-up, informants' ratings on cognitive decline significantly correlated with the cognitive decline scores (Indianapolis r = 0.38, p < 0.001; Ibadan r = 0.32, p < 0.001). The characteristics of study participants and informants had little impact on the informants' ratings on cognitive decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Informant reports are valid in assessing the cognitive functioning of study participants both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures, languages and environments.

Awareness in dementia: A review of assessment methods and measures

A comprehensive range of literature on awareness in dementia published in peer-reviewed journals during the last 15 years was reviewed with the aim of extracting details of the methods and measurement instruments adopted for the purposes of assessing awareness. Assessment approaches fell into five categories: clinician rating methods, questionnaire-based methods, performance-based methods, phenomenological methods, and multidimensional or combined methods. Ranges of objects of awareness assessment were identified both within and across domains. Strengths and limitations of methods in each category were identified. Reasons for the inconclusive findings from research using the methods described here were considered, and suggestions for future directions were made.

Short-term outcomes in older intensive care unit patients with dementia*

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of dementia on the outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) care and use of ICU interventions among older patients.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Urban university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients were 395 patients age >/=65 consecutively admitted to a medical ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Dementia was determined by a previously validated proxy measure, the Modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale. We chose cut points to focus on patients with moderate-severe dementia at baseline. Our primary outcomes included length of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included ICU readmission, changes in code status, discharge location, mortality, and use of ICU interventions. Medical record abstraction was performed to determine the rates of ICU outcomes, use of ICU interventions, and potential confounders. Our study documented a prevalence of moderate-severe dementia of 17% in patients age >/=65 admitted to the ICU. Patients with dementia were significantly older (80 vs. 76), more likely to be female (65% vs. 52%), and more likely to be admitted from a nursing home (46% vs. 11%). Patients with dementia had significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores on admission to the ICU (25 vs. 23). Patients with dementia were more likely to have their code status changed to less aggressive in the ICU (24% vs. 14%). There was no significant difference in readmission to the ICU, discharge location, ICU or hospital mortality rate, or use of ICU interventions between patients with and without dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study documents no difference in outcomes from ICU care in older patients with and without dementia. There was no increased short-term mortality rate in older patients with dementia compared with those without dementia after admission to the ICU. Presumptions that outcomes from critical care are less favorable in patients with dementia should not drive treatment decisions in the ICU.

Using the Telephone to Call for Help and Caregiver Awareness in Alzheimer Disease

We assessed the ability of 73 patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from our outpatient clinic to demonstrate how they would use the telephone to call for help in case of an emergency. We also assessed their caregivers' awareness of their abilities. Overall, 44% of the patients did not demonstrate how to call for help correctly if they had no written telephone number to call, and 18% did not when they had a written number. There was an association between the abilities of the patients and their Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, with the patients with the lowest scores having the most difficulty (P < 0.0001). Surprisingly, 21% of those with MMSE scores 26-30 did not use the telephone correctly when they had no written number. Of the caregivers, 31% were incorrect in predicting their patients' abilities for the first task, and 11% were incorrect in predicting the second task. We conclude that AD patients lose their ability to use the telephone to call for help as their illness progresses. Furthermore, many caregivers are unaware of their patients' impairment. These findings highlight safety concerns in AD and suggest that caregivers could benefit from education about potential patient losses.

Knowledge of personal information and caregiver awareness in Alzheimer's disease

We assessed the ability of 73 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) to recall important personal information like their names, their caregivers 'names, their addresses, and their telephone numbers. We also assessed their caregivers' awareness of their abilities. There was an association between the abilities of the patients and their Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores, with the patients with the lowest MMSE scores making the most errors. Five to 10 percent of the mildest patients were unable to state their addresses and telephone numbers correctly. The caregivers of the patients with intermediate MMSE scores made the most errors in their predictions, with up to 50 percent being incorrect and up to 37 percent overestimating their patients' abilities. We concluded that AD patients lose their ability to provide personal information as their illness progresses. Caregivers of patients with MMSE ranging from 10 to 25 are the most likely to be unaware of their patients' impairment. These findings highlight safety concerns in AD.

Cognitive impairment in the intensive care unit

Delirium is a frequent complication in older patients in the ICU and often persists beyond their ICU stay. Delirium in older persons in the ICU is a dynamic and complex process. There is a high prevalence of pre-existing cognitive impairment in patients who are admitted to the medical ICU. This pre-existing cognitive impairment is an important predisposing risk factor for the development of delirium during and after the ICU stay. Given the high rates of delirium in the ICU that range from 50% to 80% (see references [27, 28, 34]), future studies are urgently needed to examine risk factors for delirium in the ICU setting, such as examining the impact of psychoactive medication use on delirium rates and persistence in the ICU setting. Moreover, studies that examine the impact of delirium prevention in the ICU on rates of delirium, duration and persistence of delirium, and long-term cognitive and functional outcomes post-ICU stay are greatly needed.

Underrecognition of preexisting cognitive impairment by physicians in older ICU patients

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive impairment increases with age, as do many serious illnesses requiring intensive care. Little is known, however, about physician recognition of preexisting cognitive impairment in the ICU and which patient factors may play a role in physician recognition.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative study.

SETTING

Urban university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 165 patients aged > or =65 years who were admitted to the medical ICU.

MEASUREMENTS

Two previously validated proxy measures of cognitive impairment, the modified Blessed dementia rating scale and the informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly. Physician interviews and medical record abstraction were used to evaluate the recognition of cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

The prevalence of preexisting cognitive impairment in the ICU was 37%. Attending physicians were unaware of the preexisting cognitive impairment in 53% of cases, and intern physicians were unaware in 59% of cases. The recognition of preexisting cognitive impairment increased as the severity of the cognitive impairment increased. Two independent risk factors were identified that were significantly associated with the increased recognition of preexisting cognitive impairment (ie, impairment in activities of daily living or being admitted to the ICU from a nursing home). If both were present, preexisting cognitive impairment was 13 times more likely to be recognized.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of older ICU patients have preexisting cognitive impairment on admission to the ICU, and ICU physicians caring for these patients are unaware of this cognitive impairment in the majority of cases. Future research is needed to identify outcomes related to preexisting cognitive impairment and to improve its recognition.

Screening for preexisting cognitive impairment in older intensive care unit patients: use of proxy assessment

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of preexisting cognitive impairment (CI) in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) and compare two different proxy measures of preexisting CI in ICU patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative study.

SETTING

Urban university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred thirty patients aged 65 and older admitted to the medical ICU.

MEASUREMENTS

Two previously validated proxy measures of CI: the Modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (MBDRS) and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE).

RESULTS

The prevalence of preexisting CI in the ICU, determined using a combination of the measures, was 42%. Agreement between the two CI measures was 86%, with a kappa of 0.69, with discrepancies being related to the different domains measured by each instrument.

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of preexisting CI in patients admitted to the medical ICU. Both the MBDRS and IQCODE can be used to screen for preexisting CI in situations where direct patient assessment is not feasible. Future studies are needed to address physician recognition of CI and its effect on patient care decisions and outcomes.

Out of sight out of mind? Support and information given to distant and near relatives of those with dementia

OBJECTIVES

Increasing attention has been paid to the needs of family members caring for a person with dementia but little has been written about the impact on the wider family. This paper was intended to see whether the need for information would stretch to those relatives living far from the patient.

METHOD

A case-control study comparing two sets of relatives of community-dwelling probands in contact with secondary services and having a clinical diagnosis of dementia: one set of relatives living less than an hour away and another set living further away.The reported need for and source of information obtained by relatives was questioned using a specially designed questionnaire. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Ratings Scale were used with probands.

RESULTS

Relatives living distantly from the person with dementia reported similar rates of subjective distress but were more often dissatisfied with information received. Distant relatives were also less likely to access information from books or lay societies.

CONCLUSION

The impact of having a relative with dementia does not lessen with distance. The wider family need support and information as well as 'primary carers'. If the whole family is to be supported in their caring role, then clinicians and the lay societies need to widen their supportive net.

Diagnosing dementia in primary care: the accuracy of informant reports

In the diagnosis of dementia, information obtained from informants or proxies is important; however, little is known about the circumstances under which informants' reports lack accuracy. This study compares informant reports of cognitive status against psychometric tests to identify the degree of, and factors associated with, discrepant reporting. Four areas of patient cognitive ability were examined: memory of recent events, ability to remember a short list of items after a delay, language/naming abilities, and working memory. Primary care practitioners recruited 248 community-dwelling patients aged 75 years or more or aged 50-74 years with suspected memory complaints; 248 friends or relatives acted as informants. More than half of the informants (60%) gave responses consistent with psychometric testing. Informants who underreported patient difficulties tended to report on patients who were diagnosed as having subclinical dementia, were less educated, and had poorer remote memory. Informants who overreported difficulties were more likely to report on those diagnosed with dementia. While informant accounts are critical for the assessment of dementia, we found that in 40% of cases these reports may be inaccurate, particularly when the patient has low education and poor remote memory or when overall cognitive difficulties are mild.

The validity of informant report for grading the severity of Alzheimer's dementia

The validity of informant-based techniques has been established for the detection of dementia cases by non-pathological individuals, but is still controversial for the assessment of the severity of dementia. This study aimed at ascertaining whether informant-based evaluation (the so-called informant report) of the cognitive and behavioral impairment of a patient is valid for grading the severity of dementia, and consistent with objective assessment of the patient's cognitive and behavioral functioning. We enrolled 96 community-dwelling outpatients and 56 controls assessed at the Geriatric Evaluation Unit of the University of Modena, Italy. All patients scored lower than 27 on the MMSE, and met DSM-IV inclusion criteria for Alzheimer's dementia. Patients and controls were administered the CAMDEX interview, containing a section which collects participant (patient or control) and informant evaluations on dementia-related cognitive and behavioral deficits. The informant report resulted effective at MANOVA for grading the severity of dementia in 4 of its 5 measures (namely, memory, everyday activities, general mental functioning and depressed mood), and was correlated with the scores of several scales of the CAMDEX cognitive section (i.e., CAMCOG). Instead, the participant's (patient or control) report showed a lower capacity for grading dementia, and was poorly correlated with the psychometric outcomes of cognitive functioning. On the whole, the results corroborated the validity of the informant report in the diagnostic work-up for grading dementia, given its sensitivity to the severity of dementia, and its consistency with cognitive psychometric outcomes.

The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities

OBJECTIVE

Proxies play a critical role as sources of health information for older persons with cognitive impairment and other chronic debilitating conditions. This paper reviews the validity of proxy responses for people older than age 60 in the following areas: functioning, physical and mental health, cognition, medical care utilization, and preferences for types of care and health states.

DESIGN

A Medline review identified 24 clinical studies from 1990 to 1999 that use proxy data as a source of information about older adults.

RESULTS

In general, studies report fairly good agreement between subjects and proxies in assessments of functioning, physical health, and cognitive status, and fair-to-poor agreement in assessments of psychological well-being. Proxies tend to describe more impairment in functioning and emotional well-being, relative to subjects, a pattern that is particularly marked among persons with cognitive impairment. In addition, proxies who report more caregiver responsibilities and subjective stress from caregiver duties provide more negative assessments of subjects' health and well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings tend to support the use of proxy ratings among older adults in many areas but not all when self-reports are not feasible. There is a need for more evaluation of proxy data in relation to other measures, such as performance assessments, medical records, and claims data, which may be less subject to respondent biases.