A measurement of the efficacy of nosocomial infection control using the 95 per cent confidence interval for infection rates

Identifying meaningful outcome measures for the intensive care unit

Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts.

The impact of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections

Nosocomial bloodstream infections are a leading cause of death in the United States. If we assume a nosocomial infection rate of 5%, of which 10% are bloodstream infections, and an attributable mortality rate of 15%, bloodstream infections would represent the eighth leading cause of death in the United States. Because most risk factors for dying after bacteremia or fungemia may not be changeable, prevention efforts must focus on new infection-control technology and techniques.

Prevalence surveys of nosocomial infections using a random sampling method in Marseille hospitals

In 1992, we conducted two prevalence surveys on hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in a group of eight university affiliated hospitals with a total of 4462 acute care beds. Most of the intensive care units (ICUs) already had a prospective surveillance scheme. The need for HAI rates that could be estimated easily and economically led us to develop a prevalence survey by using a stratified sampling method. The units were distributed into four groups: ICU; clean surgery; other surgery; and medical. In each group a sample of units was randomly selected using different sampling fractions. The first survey was conducted in May and involved 1220 patients. The second survey in November included 1389 patients. The HAI rates in May and November were 8.6% (95% CI 7.4-9.8%) and 7.1% (95% CI 6-8.2%), respectively. This study allowed us to direct resources towards high risk units and clean surgical procedures. Based on the results, prospective surveillance was implemented in units of the clean surgery group.

A survey of nosocomial infections and their influence on hospital mortality rates

Nosocomial infections play an important role in contributing to hospital mortality. In order to obtain a large sample a survey was conducted between 1978 and 1989 of more than 66,000 patients in German acute care hospitals. The data were used to assess the influence of nosocomial infections on mortality rates. Hospital infections were more frequent in female patients, but mortality with or without nosocomial infection was higher in male patients. Nosocomial infections increased hospital mortality threefold when raw numbers were used. Controlling for age and sex, the existence of at least one nosocomial infection (diagnosed at the second or a later day of hospital stay) increased hospital mortality by a factor of two. The influence of nosocomial infections was shown to be small for some diseases, such as malignancy, but was greater for others such as metabolic and immunological diseases or trauma. In the case of trauma, nosocomial infections increased hospital mortality rates by a factor of three even after controlling for age.

Study of the definition of nosocomial infections (SDNI). Research Committee of the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control

If nosocomial infections are to be used as clinical indicators of quality, their definitions must be accurate. To assess validity and reliability of definitions of nosocomial infection, a study was conducted in two groups of U.S. hospitals. Group A consisted of a stratified, random sample of 715 hospitals and excluded those that are part of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. The 112 NNIS hospitals were surveyed separately in group B. Both groups used the same instrument, consisting of 36 case studies simulating patients' charts. Content and construct validity were formally tested and demonstrated. Six case studies were presented for each of the four major NI sites and for community-acquired or no infection. The pooled hospital response was 48% (396/827). The pooled number of individual responders whose data were used in the analysis was 469. Their overall mean score was 84%, and the score for correctly identifying any NI was 83%. Both groups were best at identifying urinary nosocomial infections (Group A = 92%, Group B = 93%) and poorest for no infection (Group A = 62%, Group B = 75%). Group A responders had significantly higher scores if they were certified, had a baccalaureate or higher degree, had taken a formal infection control course, had worked in infection control for greater than or equal to 2 years, or had worked full time in infection control in a greater than or equal to 200-bed hospital that was affiliated with a medical school (all p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Outbreaks of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on neonatal and burns units of a new hospital

Multiple introductions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains occurred to a new hospital in Hong Kong. Two years of clinical microbiological surveillance of the resulting outbreaks was combined with laboratory investigation by phage and antibiogram typing, and plasmid profiling. The outbreaks on the special care baby (SCBU) and burns (BU) units were studied in detail, and colonization of staff and contamination of the environment were investigated. MRSA were spread by the hands of staff on the SCBU, where long-term colonization of dermatitis was important, but were probably transmitted on the BU by a combination of the airborne, transient hand-borne and environmental routes. Simple control measures to restrict hand-borne spread on the SCBU were highly effective, but control was not successful on the BU.