Neoadjuvant therapy of rectal carcinoma with UFT-leucovorin plus radiotherapy

Performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T for early assessment of tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article is to determine whether changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) obtained 2 weeks after the beginning of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) allow to predict treatment response and whether correlate with tumor histopathologic response.

METHODS

Forty-three patients receiving CRT for LARC and 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted sequences before treatment, 2 weeks during, and 8 weeks post the completion of CRT were included. ADC values were calculated at each time point and percentage of ADC changes at 2 weeks (ΔADC during) and 8 weeks (ΔADC post) were assessed. Data were correlated to surgical results and histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG), according to Mandard's classification. ADC values and ΔADCs of complete responders (CR; TRG1) and non-complete responders (non-CR; TRG 2-5) were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess diagnostic accuracy of ΔADC for differentiating CR from non-CR. The correlation with TRG was investigated using Spearman's rank test.

RESULTS

ΔADC during and ΔADC post were significantly higher in CR (33.9% and 57%, respectively) compared to non-CR (13.5% and 2.2%, respectively) group (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). ROC analysis revealed the following diagnostic performances: ΔADC during: AUC 0.78 (0.08), p = 0.004, cut-off 20.6% (sensitivity 75% and specificity 76.5%); ΔADC post: AUC 0.94 (0.04), p ≤ 0.001, cut-off 22% (sensitivity 95% and specificity 82.4%). Significant moderate and good negative correlation was found between ΔADC during and ΔADC post and TRG (r = - 0.418, p = 0.007; r = - 694, p ≤ 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ΔADC at 2 weeks after the beginning of CRT is a reliable tool to early assess treatment response.

Efficacy and short-term outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with intermittent oral tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin in Japanese rectal cancer patients: a single center experience retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Various types of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have been established for rectal cancer; thus, Physicians will need to refine the selection of appropriate preoperative CRT for different patients since there are various treatment regimens. Oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) is commonly used to treat rectal cancer in Japan. Oral chemotherapy offers patients many potential advantages. Since 2008, we have been performing preoperative CRT with intermittent oral UFT plus LV in locally advanced rectal cancer patients to prevent postoperative local recurrence. Here, in a retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and short-term outcomes of preoperative CRT with intermittent oral UFT plus LV.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 62 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, including 31 patients who underwent preoperative CRT between 2009 and 2013 (the CRT group) and 31 patients who were treated with surgery alone between 2001 and 2008 (the non-CRT group). Clinicopathologically, both groups included patients with rectal cancer at clinical tumor stages III-IV or clinical node stages 0-III. In the CRT group, curative operations were performed ≥8 weeks after CRT. Patients were concomitantly treated with 2 cycles of oral UFT (300 mg/m²/day, days 1-14 and 29-42) plus LV (75 mg/day, days 1-14 and 29-42) and 45 Gy of radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days, followed by a 2-week break.

RESULTS

The completion rate of CRT was high at 94% (n = 29/31). The downstaging rate of CRT was 61% (n = 19/31). The pathological complete response rate was 6.5% (n = 2/31). Significant differences were observed in the 3-year local recurrence rate between the two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CRT with intermittent oral UFT plus LV appears to be a tolerable and effective treatment for Japanese patients with rectal cancer. A further investigation of a diversification of preoperative CRT for Japanese rectal cancer patients is required.

Five-year outcomes of preoperative chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma in Saudi population: single-institutional experience

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The outcomes of preoperative CRT in Saudi patients with LARC have not been widely studied. The study reports long-term outcomes after preoperative CRT followed by curative surgery in Saudi patients with LARC.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

A retrospective, single-institutional study performed in the tertiary care oncology center in Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 154 out of 204 patients with LARC were treated with preoperative CRT and followed by surgery at the oncology center between September 2005 and November 2012. Data regarding the response rates, toxicity profile, locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis control (DMC), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population was 56.6 years (range: 26-89). Predominant clinical stages were IIA (70 patients; 45.4%) and IIIB (49 patients; 31.8%). Majority of patients (79.8%) underwent a complete total mesorectal excision (TME). Complete pathological response (ypT0N0) was seen in 26 patients (16.8%). At 5 years, locoregional recurrence (LR) was reported in 12 patients (7.8%), and distant metastases were noted in 33 patients (21.4%). The 5-year cumulative LRC, DMC, OS, and DFS rates were 91%, 71.3%, 78%, and 64.8%, respectively. Stage, nodal status, circumferential margins, ypT0N0, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be important prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

The results of preoperative CRT followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in Saudi population are comparable with international data.

Is there a benefit in using magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer?

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting responses in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Articles in English language relating to the accuracy of MRI for this utility were retrieved. Methodological quality was assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Pooled estimation and subgroup analysis data were obtained by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involved 751 pathologically confirmed patients met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was relatively high. To predict histopathological response in locally advanced rectal cancer by MRI, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 [95 % confidence intervals (CI), 0.65, 0.87] and 0.81 (95 % CI, 0.72, 0.87), respectively. Positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.1 (95 %CI, 2.9, 5.8) and 0.27 (95 % CI, 0.17, 0.43), respectively. Subgroup analysis showing that imaging was performed at 3.0 T MRI devices had higher pooled sensitivity (0.92, 95 % CI, 0.84, 1.00) than the subgroup of MRI with ≤1.5 T (0.68, 95 % CI, 0.53, 0.82) (p < 0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were 0.92 (95 % CI, 0.81, 1.00) and 0.75 (95 % CI, 0.54, 0.95); those of T2WI alone were 0.64 (95 % CI, 0.47, 0.82) and 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.81, 0.94) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that MRI is an accurate tool in predicting pathologic response after preoperative therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It is suggested to perform MRI by 3.0 T devices, which might be sensitive to identify responder. The addition of DWI to T2WI showed a non-significant improvement in sensitivity, which deserves further investigation.

Apparent diffusion coefficient as a non-invasive predictor of treatment response and recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the role of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor of treatment response and local recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients who underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery were enrolled in the study. The mean tumour ADC was measured independently from multiple, non-overlapping regions of interest (ROIs) to cover the entire tumour area on a single section by two radiologists and patients were followed postoperatively for a median of 16.4 months. Diagnostic accuracy of ADC for predicting treatment response and recurrence was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Univariate and multivariate analyses including clinical tumour (cT) staging, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, lymph-node involvement, tumour grade, surgical margin, vascular involvement, and ADC were performed with respect to recurrence. Interobserver agreement of ADC values was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients showed response to neoadjuvant therapy and recurrence was noted in 17 patients. Low pretreatment ADC, MRI findings of cT4 staging, and node involvement were significantly related to poor treatment response. Sensitivity and specificity of ADC = 0.833 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for prediction of treatment response was 75 and 48% for reader 1 and 65 and 52% for reader 2, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified pretreatment tumour ADC as the only predictive factor for recurrence. Sensitivity and specificity of ADC = 0.833 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for prediction of recurrence was 86 and 77% for reader 1 and 80 and 69% for reader 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement for measuring ADC was good with a kappa value of 0.70.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment rectal tumour ADC values may be an early biomarker for predicting treatment response and local recurrence in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

KRAS mutation does not predict the efficacy of neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The current management of locally advanced rectal cancer involves total mesorectal excision, which may be preceded by neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Individual patient response to CRT is variable and reproducible biomarkers of response are needed. The role of the V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) in rectal cancer remains equivocal. The aim of the current study was to systematically appraise the effect of KRAS mutation on outcomes following CRT for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for published studies examining the effect of KRAS mutation on outcome after neo-adjuvant CRT in rectal cancer was performed. Each study was reviewed and data extracted. Random-effects methods were used to combine data.

RESULTS

Data was retrieved from 8 series describing 696 patients. Neo-adjuvant treatment regimens varied in usage of chemotherapeutic agents and interval to surgery. KRAS mutation was present in an average of 33.2 ± 11.8% of patients with rectal cancer. KRAS mutation was not associated with decreased rates of pathological complete response (odds ratio (OR): 0.778, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.424-1.428, P = 0.418), tumor down-staging (OR: 0.846, 95% CI: 0.331-2.162, P = 0.728) or an increase in cancer related mortality (OR: 1.239, 95% CI: 0.607-2.531, P = 0.555).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, the presence of KRAS mutation does not affect tumor down-staging or cancer specific survival following neo-adjuvant CRT and surgery for rectal cancer.

Prognosis factors for recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer preoperatively treated with chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision has improved the outcome of locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify independent prognosis factors of disease recurrence in a group of patients treated with this approach.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

This study was retrospective in design. Data from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had completed treatment from 2000 to 2010 were reviewed.

SETTINGS

The analysis was performed in a tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the recurrence risk factors.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 228 patients; 69.3% of them were men, and median age was 59 years. Stage III rectal cancer was found in 64.9% of patients. The most frequently administered therapy was concurrent capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and 7-field radiotherapy, followed by 3-field radiotherapy and fluoropyrimidines. After a median follow-up of 49 months, 23.7% of the patients experienced disease recurrence: 2.6% had local recurrence, 21.1% had distant metastases, and 0.5% had both. Factors significantly correlated with recurrence risk in multivariate logistic regression were y-pathological stage (III vs I/II: OR = 2.51), tumor regression grade (1/2 vs 3+/4: OR = 3.34; 3 vs 3+/4: OR = 1.20), and low rectal location (OR = 2.36). The only independent prognosis factor for liver metastases was tumor regression grade (1/2 vs 3+/4: OR = 4.67; 3 vs 3+/4: OR = 1.41), whereas tumor regression grade (1-2 vs 3+/4: OR = 5.5; 3 vs 3+/4: OR = 1.84), low rectal location (OR = 3.23), and previous liver metastasis (OR = 7.73) predicted lung recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

This is a single institutional experience, neoadjuvant combined therapy is not homogeneous, and the analysis has been performed in a retrospective manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low third locally advanced rectal cancer with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (high y-pathological stage or low tumor regression grade) are at high risk of recurrence. Intense surveillance and the design of alternative therapeutic approaches aimed to lower the distant failure rate seem warranted.

Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activity in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To compare preoperative RT with preoperative CRT in patients with resectable stage II and III rectal cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase.com, and Pubmed from 1975 until June 2012. A manual search was performed of Ann Surg, Arch Surg, Cancer, J Clin Oncol, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and the proceedings of ASTRO, ECCO and ASCO from 1990 until June 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Relevant studies randomized resectable stage II or III rectal cancer patients to at least one arm of preoperative RT alone or at least one arm of preoperative CRT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome parameters included overall survival (OS) at 5 years and local recurrence (LR) rate at 5 years. Secondary outcome parameters included disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years, metastasis rate, pathological complete response rate, clinical response rate, sphincter preservation rate, acute toxicity, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and anastomotic leak rate. Outcome parameters were summarized using the Odds Ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. From one of the included trials only preliminary data are reported. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly increased grade III and IV acute toxicity (OR 1.68-10, P = 0.002) and marginally affected postoperative overall morbidity (OR 0.67-1.00, P = 0.05) while no differences were observed in postoperative mortality or anastomotic leak rate. Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT significantly increased the rate of complete pathological response (OR 2.12-5.84, P < 0.00001) although this did not translate into a higher sphincter preservation rate (OR 0.92-1.30, P = 0.32). The incidence of local recurrence at five years was significantly lower in the CRT group compared to RT alone (OR 0.39-0.72, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in DFS (OR 0.92-1.34, P = 0.27) or OS (OR 0.79-1.14, P = 0.58) at five years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT enhances pathological response and improves local control in resectable stage II and III rectal cancer, but does not benefit disease free or overall survival. The effects of preoperative CRT on functional outcome and quality of life are incompletely understood and should be addressed in future trials.

Neoadjuvant oral vs. infusional chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer: Prognostic factors

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic factors and impact on survival of neoadjuvant oral and infusional chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

There is still no definitive consensus about the prognostic factors and the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival. Some studies have pointed to an improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumor downstaging (TD) and nodal downstaging (ND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A set of 159 patients with LARC were treated preoperatively. Group A - 112 patients underwent concomitant oral chemoradiotherapy: capecitabine or UFT + folinic acid. Group B - 47 patients submitted to concomitant chemoradiation with 5-FU in continuous infusion. 63.6% of patients were submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

GROUP A

pathologic complete response (pCR) - 18.7%; TD - 55.1%; ND - 76%; loco-regional response - 74.8%. Group B: pCR - 11.4%; TD - 50%; ND - 55.8%; LRR - 54.5%. The loco-regional control was 95.6%. There was no difference in survival between both groups. Those with loco-regional response had better PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor and nodal downstaging, loco-regional response and a normal CEA level turned out to be important prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nodal downstaging and loco-regional response were higher in Group A. Those with tumor downstaging and loco-regional response from Group A had better OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on survival except in those patients with loco-regional response who achieved a higher PFS.

Comparison of neoadjuvant oral chemotherapy with UFT plus Folinic acid or Capecitabine concomitant with radiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the differences in treatment response and the impact on survival with both oral agents (UFT and Capecitabine) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered concomitantly with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND

There are still no studies comparing the use of neoadjuvant oral chemotherapy either with UFT plus Folinic acid or Capecitabine concomitant with radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A set of 112 patients with LARC were treated preoperatively. GROUP 1 - 61 patients underwent concomitant oral chemotherapy with Capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) twice daily). GROUP 2 - 51 patients submitted to concomitant oral chemotherapy with UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) + Folinic acid (90 mg/d) and radiotherapy. 57.1% of patients were submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

GROUP 1: acute toxicity - 80.3%; pathological complete response (pCR) - 10.5%; tumor downstaging (TD) - 49.1%; nodal downstaging (ND) - 76.5%; loco-regional response (LRR) - 71.9%; toxicity to adjuvant chemotherapy - 75%. GROUP 2: acute toxicity - 80.4%; pCR - 28%; TD - 62%; ND - 75.6%; LRR - 78%; toxicity to adjuvant chemotherapy - 56%. There was no difference in survival nor loco-regional control between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with neoadjuvant oral UFT + Folinic acid had a higher rate of pathologic complete response than patients treated with Capecitabine concomitant with radiotherapy. There were no differences in downstaging, LRR, toxicity, survival or loco-regional control between both groups. There was a trend to a higher rate of toxicity to adjuvant chemotherapy in the Capecitabine group.

Prognostic significance of adverse events associated with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Adverse events may occur in patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) for rectal cancers. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical and pathological features of the patients with PRT-related adverse events, and the significance of the adverse events on the clinical outcome.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with T3 or T4 low rectal cancers curatively resected following PRT were studied. Thirty-one patients received radiotherapy, and 44 patients received chemoradiotherapy with tegafur-uracil and leucovorin. The total radiation dose was 50-50.4 Gy given in 25-28 fractions and the operation was performed 4-8 weeks after PRT. PRT-related adverse events were graded in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.

RESULTS

The most frequent adverse events were leukocytopenia and diarrhea, observed in 12% and 24% of patients, respectively. The majority of the leukocytopenia and diarrhea was grade 1-2 toxicity. Women experienced leukocytopenia more frequently than men (28% vs. 7%, p = 0.0317); however, no other predisposing factor for adverse events was recognized. Patients with leukocytopenia or diarrhea showed a better 5-year relapse-free survival rate than those without (94 ± 5% vs. 49 ± 9%, p = 0.00054), and the presence of these adverse events was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of leukocytopenia or diarrhea was an independent predictor of a fair prognosis after curative operation following PRT, and thus these adverse events seem not to discourage oncologists and patients from considering PRT for rectal cancers.

A combined strategy of SAGE and quantitative PCR Provides a 13-gene signature that predicts preoperative chemoradiotherapy response and outcome in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the treatment of choice for rectal cancer (RC), but half of the patients do not respond, suffer unnecessary toxicities, and surgery delays. We aimed to develop a model that could predict a clinically meaningful response to CRT by using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We first carried out an exploratory screening of candidate genes by using SAGE technology to evaluate dynamic changes in the RC transcriptome in selected refractory patients before and after CRT. Next, 53 genes (24 from SAGE and 29 from the literature) were analyzed by qPCR arrays in FFPE initial biopsies from 94 stage II/III RC patients who were preoperatively treated with CRT. Tumor response was defined by using Dworak's tumor regression grade (2-3-4 vs. 0-1). Multivariate Cox methods and stepwise algorithms were applied to generate an optimized predictor of response and outcome.

RESULTS

In the training cohort (57 patients), a 13-gene signature predicted tumor response with 86% accuracy, 87% sensitivity, and 82% specificity. In a testing cohort (37 patients), the model correctly classified 6 of 7 nonresponders, with an overall accuracy of 76%. A signature-based score identified patients with a higher risk of relapse in univariate (3-year disease-free survival 64% vs. 90%, P = 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 4.35 95% CI: 1.2-15.75, P = 0.02), in which it remained the only statistically significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

A basal 13-gene signature efficiently predicted CRT response and outcome. Multicentric validation by the GEMCAD collaborative group is currently ongoing. If confirmed, the predictor could be used to improve patient selection in RC studies.

Phase II study of preoperative radiation plus concurrent daily tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin for locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

Considerable variation in intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism can occur due to the wide range of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity, which can affect both tolerability and efficacy. The oral fluoropyrimidine tegafur-uracil (UFT) is an effective, well-tolerated and convenient alternative to intravenous 5-FU. We undertook this study in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of UFT with leucovorin (LV) and preoperative radiotherapy and to evaluate the utility and limitations of multicenter staging using pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy ultrasound. We also performed a validated pretherapy assessment of DPD activity and assessed its potential influence on the tolerability of UFT treatment.

Methods

This phase II study assessed preoperative UFT with LV and radiotherapy in 85 patients with locally advanced T3 rectal cancer. Patients with potentially resectable tumors received UFT (300 mg/m/²/day), LV (75 mg/day), and pelvic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, 45 Gy total) 5 days/week for 5 weeks then surgery 4-6 weeks later. The primary endpoints included tumor downstaging and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

Results

Most adverse events were mild to moderate in nature. Preoperative grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (n = 18, 21%) and nausea/vomiting (n = 5, 6%). Two patients heterozygous for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) experienced early grade 4 neutropenia (variant IVS14+1G > A) and diarrhea (variant 2846A > T). Pretreatment ultrasound TNM staging was compared with postchemoradiotherapy pathology TN staging and a significant shift towards earlier TNM stages was observed (p < 0.001). The overall downstaging rate was 42% for primary tumors and 44% for lymph nodes. The pCR rate was 8%. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for staging was poor. Anal sphincter function was preserved in 55 patients (65%). Overall and recurrence-free survival at 3 years was 86.1% and 66.7%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 36 node-positive patients (mean duration 118 days).

Conclusion

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy using UFT with LV plus radiotherapy was well tolerated and effective and represents a convenient alternative to 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of resectable rectal cancer. Pretreatment detection of DPD deficiency should be performed to avoid severe adverse events.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on pathologic response and survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) has been controversial. Some studies have pointed to an improvement in OS and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR).

AIM

To evaluate the therapeutic response and impact on survival of preoperative RT, alone or combined with CT, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A set of 132 patients with LARC were treated preoperatively. GROUP 1: RT alone, 19 patients. GROUP 2: RT and concomitant oral CT (Capecitabine or UFT + leucovorin), 68 patients. GROUP 3: RT and concomitant CT with 5-FU in continuous infusion, 45 patients. 58.2% of patients were submitted to adjuvant CT.

RESULTS

GROUP 1: no pCR, tumoral downstaging was 26.7%. GROUP 2: pCR in 16.9%; tumoral downstaging was 47.7%. GROUP 3: pCR in 11.9%; tumor downstaging was 52.4%. The loco-regional control (LRC) was 95%. The 5-year OS (p = 0.038) and DFS (p = 0.05) were significantly superior in patients treated with CT + RT. Patients with pCR had a significant increase on DFS (p = 0.019). Patients cT3-4 that had a tumoral downstaging to ypT0-2, showed an increase on DFS, OS and LRC.

CONCLUSIONS

CT combined with RT has increased tumoral response and survival rate. Nodal downstaging and pCR were higher in the GROUP 2. The 5-year OS and DFS were significantly superior in CT + RT arms. Patients with pathologic response showed a better DFS. Adjuvant CT had no impact on LRC, DFS nor on OS.

Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging

PURPOSE

To determine whether changes in apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of rectal carcinoma obtained 1 week after the beginning of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) correlate with tumor histopathologic downstaging after preoperative CRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was approved by an institutional review board; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty-seven patients (mean age, 54.7 years; 13 women, 24 men) with primary rectal carcinoma who were undergoing preoperative CRT were recruited for the study. Diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed with a 1.5-T MR imager in all patients before therapy, at the end of the 1st and 2nd week of therapy, and before surgery. Tumor ADCs were calculated. Linear mixed-effects modeling was applied to analyze change in ADCs and volumes following treatment.

RESULTS

Patients were assigned to the tumor downstaged group (n = 17) or the tumor nondownstaged group (n = 20) on the basis of histopathologic examination results following surgery. Before CRT, the mean tumor ADC in the downstaged group was lower than that in the nondownstaged group (1.07 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.13 [standard deviation] vs 1.19 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.15, F = 6.91, P = .013). At the end of the 1st week of CRT, the mean tumor ADC increased significantly from 1.07 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.13 to 1.32 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.16 (F = 37.63, P <.001) in the downstaged group, but there was no significant ADC increase in the nondownstaged group (F = 1.18, P = .291). The mean percentage of tumor ADC change in the downstaged group was significantly higher than that in the nondownstaged group at each time point (F = 18.39, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Early increase of mean tumor ADC and low pretherapy mean ADC in rectal carcinoma correlate with good response to CRT. DW MR imaging is a promising noninvasive technique for helping predict and monitor early therapeutic response in patients with rectal carcinoma who are undergoing CRT.

High-dose radiotherapy and concurrent UFT plus l-leucovorin in locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase I trial

A phase I trial of preoperative high dose pelvic radiotherapy and oral UFT/l-leucovorin in patients with locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer patients to evaluate toxicity and efficacy was performed. Eighteen patients (14 with primary unresectable tumours and four with locally recurrent tumours) were treated. All patients were evaluable for acute toxicity and efficacy. Patients received increasing doses of UFT (150 to 300 mg/m2/day UFT and a fixed dose of 22.5 mg/day l-leucovorin) with each fraction, five days a week for 30 days, concomitantly with pelvic radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions using concomitant boost technique). All patients received the planned dose of radiotherapy. No hematological toxicity was observed. Only one patient developed grade 3 toxicity (diarrhea). Fourteen patients (78%) had surgery (11 R0 and 3 R1) after median 40 days. Two patients (11%) had a complete pathological response. Ten patients are alive after median follow-up of 49 months. Toxicity, resection rate and survival are very encouraging and the study continues as a phase II trial.

Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen level in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and pathological parameters to improve prediction of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Between July 1995 and May 2007, 148 patients with primary rectal adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by mesorectal excision. Preoperative treatment included various protocols, UFT and leucovorin (28%) and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (72%). Clinical and pathological variables were evaluated in relation to patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen percent of patients achieved a complete pathologic response. No response or minimal response as defined by Dworak (Tumor Regression Grade 0/1) was observed in 30 patients (20%). At a median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year DFS and OS were 64% and 83%, respectively. Pre-treatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level </= 2.5 ng/ml was associated with higher DFS (74 vs. 53%; p = 0.018), higher complete pathologic responses (21 vs. 9%; p = 0.05), and less recurrences (24 vs. 44%; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that a CEA level </= 2.5 ng/ml might be a predictor not only of tumor response, as has been suggested before, but also of DFS. This finding could be useful in the future to predict individual risk and to develop more aggressive or alternative strategies.

Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in rectal cancer patients with or without stomas following primary resection

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal impact of stoma formation on the health-related quality of life of rectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Health-related quality of life data was prospectively collected in a randomized trial designed to compare 24 weeks of bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with 12 weeks of continuous 5-fluorouracil in patients with resected Dukes B and C colorectal cancer. Health-related quality of life data was collected at baseline, during adjuvant treatment, and at one and three years after completion of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between 1993 and 2003, 186 rectal cancer patients were enrolled. One hundred thirty-nine patients had anterior resection, of whom 46 had a temporary defunctioning colostomy. Forty-seven patients had abdominoperineal resection with formation of a permanent colostomy. There was no significant difference in global health-related quality of life between patients with and patients without a stoma at any time point. However, during adjuvant treatment, role (P = 0.04) and social (P = 0.005) functioning were significantly worse in stoma patients than in nonstoma patients. Moreover, the impairment in social functioning persisted at one (P = 0.03) and three years (P = 0.04) after adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate important adverse effects of either temporary or permanent stoma formation on subsequent health-related quality of life in patients with rectal cancer.

Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activity in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To compare preoperative RT with preoperative CRT in patients with resectable stage II and III rectal cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase.com, and Pubmed from 1975 until june 2007. A manual search was performed of Ann Surg, Arch Surg, Cancer, J Clin Oncol, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and the proceedings of ASTRO, ECCO and ASCO from 1990 until june 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Relevant studies randomized resectable stage II or III rectal cancer patients to at least one arm of preoperative RT alone or at least one arm of preoperative CRT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome parameters included overall survival (OS) at 5 years and local recurrence (LR) rate at 5 years. Secondary outcome parameters included disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years, metastasis rate, pathological complete response rate, clinical response rate, sphincter preservation rate, acute toxicity, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and anastomotic leak rate. Outcome parameters were summarized using the Odds Ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly increased grade III and IV acute toxicity (OR 1.68-10, P = 0.002) while no differences were observed in postoperative morbidity or mortality. Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT significantly increased the rate of complete pathological response (OR 2.52-5.27, P < 0.001) although this did not translate into a higher sphincter preservation rate (OR 0.92-1.31, P = 0.29). The incidence of local recurrence at five years was significantly lower in the CRT group compared to RT alone (OR 0.39-0.72, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in DFS (OR 0.92-1.34, P = 0.27) or OS (OR 0.79-1.14, P = 0.58) at five years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT enhances pathological response and improves local control in resectable stage II and III rectal cancer, but does not benefit disease free or overall survival. The effects of preoperative CRT on functional outcome and quality of life are incompletely understood and should be addressed in future trials.

Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activity in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To compare preoperative RT with preoperative CRT in patients with resectable stage II and III rectal cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase.com, and Pubmed from 1975 until june 2007. A manual search was performed of Ann Surg, Arch Surg, Cancer, J Clin Oncol, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and the proceedings of ASTRO, ECCO and ASCO from 1990 until june 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Relevant studies randomized resectable stage II or III rectal cancer patients to at least one arm of preoperative RT alone or at least one arm of preoperative CRT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome parameters included overall survival (OS) at 5 years and local recurrence (LR) rate at 5 years. Secondary outcome parameters included disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years, metastasis rate, pathological complete response rate, clinical response rate, sphincter preservation rate, acute toxicity, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and anastomotic leak rate. Outcome parameters were summarized using the Odds Ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly increased grade III and IV acute toxicity (OR 1.68-10, P = 0.002) while no differences were observed in postoperative morbidity or mortality. Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT significantly increased the rate of complete pathological response (OR 2.52-5.27, P < 0.001) although this did not translate into a higher sphincter preservation rate (OR 0.92-1.31, P = 0.29). The incidence of local recurrence at five years was significantly lower in the CRT group compared to RT alone (OR 0.39-0.72, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in DFS (OR 0.92-1.34, P = 0.27) or OS (OR 0.79-1.14, P = 0.58) at five years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT enhances pathological response and improves local control in resectable stage II and III rectal cancer, but does not benefit disease free or overall survival. The effects of preoperative CRT on functional outcome and quality of life are incompletely understood and should be addressed in future trials.

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with UFT and Leucovorin in patients with advanced rectal cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

The aim this study was to determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate defined as tumor regression grade 1 (TRG1) and toxicity profile of the combination of high-dose pre-operative radiotherapy and simultaneous UFT/leucovorin (LV) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Eligibility included biopsy proven rectal adenocarcinoma; T3-T4 N0-N2; performance status < 2 (ECOG) and adequate blood, hepatic and renal function. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy/day and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day and LV 60 mg/day, given simultaneously daily for 6 weeks. Surgery was performed within 4-6 weeks period after chemoradiotherapy. Patients who did not achieve TGR1 were to receive 4 cycles of adjuvant UFT/LV on days 1-28, every 5 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included. All but one received full dose of radiation and 62 had the total planned pre-operative UFT/LV dose. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea 7% and proctitis 3%. Complete resection was achieved in 62 patients (91%). Tumor regression grade 1 (TRG1) was seen in 11 patients (16%). Forty-eight patients received adjuvant UFT/LV. Grade 3 toxicity during adjuvant UFT/LV included diarrhea 12%, asthenia 4%, neutropenia 2%, and hand-foot syndrome 2%. The 3-year disease-free survival was 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous high-dose pre-operative localized radiation therapy concurrent with UFT/LV is feasible and has a low toxicity profile. This schedule is highly effective and merits further investigation.

UFT (tegafur-uracil) in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Major achievements in the treatment of localised rectal cancer include the development of total mesorectal excision and the perioperative administration of radiotherapy in combination with continuous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This multimodal approach has resulted in extended survival and lower local relapse rates, with the potential for sphincter-preserving procedures. However, CI 5-FU is inconvenient for patients and is costly. Oral fluoropyrimidines like UFT (tegafur-uracil) offer a number of advantages over 5-FU.

METHODS

We undertook a review of published articles and abstracts relating to clinical studies of UFT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Pre- and postoperative studies carried out in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent disease were included.

RESULTS

The combination of UFT and radiotherapy was effective and well tolerated in the preoperative setting, while adjuvant UFT improved survival and reduced distant relapse compared with surgery alone. The efficacy of UFT appears comparable with that of 5-FU and capecitabine and its side-effect profile is favourable.

CONCLUSION

Clinical experience to date suggests that UFT is a valuable treatment option for the perioperative treatment of LARC. Further improvements in patient outcomes may result from the combination of UFT with targeted agents.

Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response

AIMS

With the aim of improving locoregional control, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer has increased. A pathological complete response (pCR) is often used as a surrogate marker for the efficacy of different CRT schedules. By analysing factors affecting pCR, this analysis aims to guide the development of future trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches of Medline, EMBASE and the electronic American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases were carried out to identify prospective phase II and phase III trials using preoperative CRT to treat rectal cancer. Trials were eligible for inclusion if they defined: the CRT drugs, the radiation dose and the pCR rate. Phase I patients were excluded from the analysis. A multivariate analysis examined the effect of the above variables on the pCR rate and in addition the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs abstract), the year of publication and whether the cancers were stated to be inoperable, fixed or threatening the circumferential resection margin were included. The method of analysis used was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-four phase II and seven phase III trials were identified including a total of 4732 patients. Statistically significant factors associated with pCR were the use of two drugs, the method of fluoropyrimidine administration (with continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil being the most effective) and a higher radiotherapy dose. Although the use of two drugs was associated with a higher rate of pCR, no single schedule seemed to be more effective. None of the other factors analysed significantly influenced pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher rate of pCR is seen in studies using two drugs, infusional 5-fluorouracil and a radiotherapy dose of 45 Gy and above.

Rectal cancer treatment: Improving the picture

Multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer treatment is currently well defined. Nevertheless, new and promising advances are enriching the portrait. Since the US NIH Consensus in the early 90’s some new characters have been added. A bird’s-eye view along the last decade shows the main milestones in the development of rectal cancer treatment protocols. New drugs, in combination with radiotherapy are being tested to increase response and tumor control outcomes. However, therapeutic intensity is often associated with toxicity. Thus, innovative strategies are needed to create a better-balanced therapeutic ratio. Molecular targeted therapies and improved technology for delivering radiotherapy respond to the need for accuracy and precision in rectal cancer treatment.

Preliminary results of phase I trial of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT), leucovorin plus irinotecan and radiation therapy for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical attempts for locally recurrent rectal cancer often fail due to local re-recurrence and distant metastasis. Preoperative chemoradiation may enhance better local control and survival. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV), and irinotecan combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of the triple drug regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer received escalating doses of irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (starting at 30 mg/m2, with 10 mg increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of UFT (300 mg/m2) plus LV (75 mg/day) on days 3 to 7, 10 to 14, 17 to 21, and 24 to 28. Radiation was given 5 days per week totaling 40 to 50 Gy (2Gy/day).

RESULTS

Six patients were treated at the starting dose, and 2 received the full scheduled chemoradiotherapy. The other 4 patients had grade 3 diarrhea and diarrhea was the DLT. One patient had partial response and he had subsequently radical surgical resection. Median progression free survival for local recurrence was 320 days.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan plus UFT/LV with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer was not feasible due to diarrhea in this setting. Modification of the treatment is needed.

Ten-year results of preoperative radiation followed by sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: increased local failure rate in nonresponders

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of sphincter preservation with preoperative radiation therapy (RT) and surgical resection in the treatment of distal rectal adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1988 and December 1996, 36 (cT2, n=9; cT3, n=27) patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled on a phase I/II trial of preoperative RT followed by surgical resection. All patients had distal tumors that were clinically judged to require an abdominoperineal resection and received preoperative RT (50.4 Gy) followed by surgery. The median follow-up was 94.5 months (range, 4-187 months).

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients in this study who underwent resection, 77% were able to undergo sphincter preservation after preoperative RT. The pathologic complete response rate for these patients was 14%. The 10-year rates of overall survival and local failure for patients undergoing sphincter preservation were 54% and 21%, respectively. The 10-year local failure was 26% in patients with cT3 disease who underwent sphincter preservation. All local failures in this study occurred in patients with cT3 disease undergoing sphincter preservation; however, none of the patients with cT3 disease that was downstaged by preoperative RT experienced local failure. In contrast, 10-year local failure was 67% in the patients with cT3 disease that was not downstaged by RT. Sphincter function was good or excellent in 85% of patients at the time of last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This approach provides excellent long-term results in all patients with cT2 disease and those with cT3 disease that is downstaged by RT. However, patients with cT3 disease that is not downstaged by RT have an increased risk of local failure. These data underscore the impact of tumor response to radiation on long-term oncologic outcome.

Preoperative versus postoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Overall mortality of rectal cancer at 5 years is approximately 40%. This cancer is commonly diagnosed at an early stage, but because of local relapse and/or metastatic disease, only half of radically resected patients can be considered disease free.

COMMON TREATMENT

The value of adding radiotherapy to surgery in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal cancer has been assessed in trials using either preoperative or postoperative irradiation.

IMPROVEMENTS IN TREATMENT

Preoperative radiotherapy and complete resection are established modalities for Stage II and III rectal cancer whilst data reporting improvement of survival by preoperative chemoradiotherapy are still not available. At present, the improved results reported by Phase II trials in terms of local control, sphincter saving and tumor regression grade make neoadjuvant treatment the 'standard' therapy only in North America and some other countries, but the concept of preoperative combined modality treatment is not supported globally.

Improved incidence of pT0 downstaged surgical specimens in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with induction oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and preoperative chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy in terms of pathologic response in LARC patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, with or without a short-intense course of induction oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 05/98 to 10/02, 114 patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (4500-5040 cGy + oral Tegafur 1200 mg/day) for cT(3)-(4)N(+/x)M(0) rectal cancer. Starting 05/01, 52 consecutive patients additionally received induction FOLFOX-4, oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) iv d1), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) iv bolus d1) and 600 mg/m(2) iv continuous infusion in 22 h with leucovorin (200 mg iv) d1 and d2, every 15 days (2 cycles), followed by the previously described Tegafur chemoradiation regime. Surgery was performed in 5-6 weeks. Pathological assessment investigated post-treatment T and N status in the rectal wall and peri-rectal tissues.

RESULTS

Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics were comparable between groups. Incidence of pT(0) specimens was significantly increased by induction FOLFOX-4 (P = 0.006). Total T and N downstaging were 58% versus 75% and 42% versus 40%, respectively (P = ns). T downstaging of > or =2 categories was significantly superior in FOLFOX-4 group (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-intense induction FOLFOX-4 significantly improves pathologic complete response in LARC patients treated with tegafur-sensitized preoperative chemoradiation. The 44% rate of pT(0)-(1) specimens observed in the oxaliplatin group should impulse innovative surgical approaches to promote ano-rectal sphincter conserving protocols.

Pre-operative combined modality therapy in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer

AIMS

To review the use of pre-operative combined modality therapy (CMT, chemotherapy with radiotherapy) in the management of resectable rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on pre-operative CMT and rectal cancer. Additional information was retrieved from hand searching the literature and from relevant congress proceedings. We addressed the following issues: Phase II studies of pre-operative CMT, pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) alone vs pre-operative CMT, pre-operative vs post-operative CMT, functional outcome and pathologic downstaging after CMT, prediction and importance of complete response to CMT.

RESULTS

Pre-operative CMT results in an average pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 18.5% in Phase II studies. Compared with pre-operative RT alone, the addition of CT significantly improves tumour response but not overall survival while acute toxicity increases and the effect on sphincter preservation is at present unclear. Pre-operative CMT has been proven to be superior to post-operative CMT in a German multicenter randomized trial. The scarce available data suggest that the addition of CT might worsen anorectal function compared to pre-operative RT alone. Although a significant pathological response is prognostically favourable, the clinical and imaging tools available at present do not allow to accurately predict pCR in clinical complete responders confirming the indication for surgery in this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative CMT enhances tumour response and could therefore, have a role in patients with possibly invaded resection margins or low lying cancers, although both acute toxicity and anorectal function are worse compared to RT alone. The final results of ongoing randomized trials will more accurately establish the role of pre-operative CMT in resectable rectal cancer patients.

Pathological complete response following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: analysis of phase II/III trials

Pathological complete response (pCR) has been used as a marker for the efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) schedules in rectal cancer. To date there have been no randomized trials comparing CRT regimens in rectal cancer. Prospective phase II and CRT arms of randomized trials reported up to January 2004 were included, providing they defined the following minimum variables: drugs employed during CRT, radiotherapy dose and pCR rate. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationship of these variables on the pCR rate. In addition, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs meeting abstract) and whether the tumours were stated to be unresectable/clinically fixed or to have threatened circumferential margins were investigated. The method of analysis was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate which was normalized by the arcsine transformation. Phase II and phase III trials were identified including a total of 3157 patients. On multivariate analysis only the use of continuous infusion 5FU (p = 0.01), the use of a second drug (p = 0.001) and radiation dose (p = 0.02) were associated with higher rates of pCR. The use of a two drug regimen, the mode of delivery of 5FU and the radiation dose appear to be related to the incidence of pCR following CRT for rectal cancer. These results may generate hypotheses for future randomized trials. Important factors not considered in this analysis include the variability in pathological examination and in the time interval between CRT and surgery. In addition, the toxicity of the CRT regimens requires further investigation.

Distal cT2N0 rectal cancer: is there an alternative to abdominoperineal resection?

PURPOSE

Patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer do not require adjuvant therapy. However, when a patient refuses an abdominoperineal resection (APR), is there an alternative? The purpose of this trial is to determine whether preoperative external-beam radiation therapy can increase the rate of sphincter preservation for patients with distal cT2N0 adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1988 and October 2003, 27 patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma staged T2 by clinical and/or endorectal ultrasound who were judged by the operating surgeon to require an APR were treated with preoperative pelvic radiation alone (50.4 Gy). Surgery was performed 4 to 7 weeks later. If pathologic positive pelvic nodes were identified, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended. The median follow-up was 55 months (range, 9 to 140 months).

RESULTS

The pathologic complete response rate was 15% and 78% of patients underwent a sphincter-sparing procedure. The crude incidence of local failure for patients undergoing a sphincter sparing procedure was 10% and the 5-year actuarial incidence was 13%. The actuarial 5-year survival for patients undergoing sphincter preservation was as follows: disease-free, 77%; colostomy-free, 100%; and overall, 85%. Using the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center sphincter function score, 54% of those undergoing a sphincter-sparing procedure had good/excellent bowel function at 12 to 24 months after surgery, and 77% had good/excellent function at 24 to 36 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that for patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer who require an APR, preoperative pelvic radiation improves sphincter preservation without an apparent compromise in local control or survival.

Promising results of a cooperative group phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (TROG 9801)

PURPOSE

This article reports the overall survival, failure-free survival, local failure, and late radiation toxicity of a phase II trial of preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for rectal cancer after a minimum 3.5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those with newly diagnosed localized adenocarcinoma of the rectum, within 12 cm of the anal verge, staged T3-T4 and deemed suitable for curative resection. Radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions in five weeks and three days) was given with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil throughout the course of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were accrued in 13 months. The median follow-up time was 4.1 (range, 2.3-4.5) years. There were 55 males (67 percent) and the median age was 59 (range, 27-87) years. Patients were staged pretreatment as T3 (89 percent) and resectable T4 (11 percent). Endorectal ultrasound was performed in 70 percent and magnetic resonance imaging in another 5 percent. The four-year overall and failure-free survival rates were 82 percent (95 percent CI: 72-89) and 69 percent (95 percent CI: 58-78), respectively. The cumulative incidence of local failure at four years was 3.9 percent (95 percent CI: 1.3-11). Risk of failures, local and distant, has not reached a plateau phase.

CONCLUSION

This regimen can be delivered safely and without leading to a significant increase in late toxicity. It provides excellent local control and favorable overall survival. There is a need for longer follow-up than has commonly been used for the proper evaluation of failures after an effective regimen of preoperative chemoradiation.

Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our aims were to (1) determine the long-term oncologic outcome for patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative combined modality therapy (CMT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME), (2) identify factors predictive of oncologic outcome, and (3) determine the oncologic significance of the extent of pathologic tumor response.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Locally advanced (T3-4 and/or N1) rectal adenocarcinoma is commonly treated with preoperative CMT and TME. However, the long-term oncologic results of this approach and factors predictive of a durable outcome remain largely unknown.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-seven consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma at a median distance of 6 cm from the anal verge (range 0-15 cm) were treated with preoperative CMT (radiation: 5040 centi-Gray (cGy) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy) followed by TME from 1988 to 2002. A prospectively collected database was queried for long-term oncologic outcome and predictive clinicopathologic factors.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 44 months, the estimated 10-year overall survival (OS) was 58% and 10 year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 62%. On multivariate analysis, pathologic response >95%, lymphovascular invasion and/or perineural invasion (PNI), and positive lymph nodes were significantly associated with OS and RFS. Patients with a >95% pathologic response had a significantly improved OS (P = 0.003) and RFS (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with preoperative CMT followed by TME can provide for a durable 10-year OS of 58% and RFS of 62%. Patients who achieve a >95% response to preoperative CMT have an improved long-term oncologic outcome, a novel finding that deserves further study.

Gastrointestinal cancer: recent developments in medical oncology

BACKGROUND

Progress in the medical oncological treatment of gastrointestinal cancer has resulted from advances in tumour biology as well as randomised clinical trials. This review updates oncologists on developments in perioperative therapy for gastrointestinal tumours, optimal use of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, and novel targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

METHODS

The recent literature, including published abstracts, was reviewed with respect to current and developing treatments for gastrointestinal cancers. Emphasis was given to randomised clinical trials published within the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Randomised evidence exists to support the use of pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer and pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer. There is preliminary randomised evidence to support the use of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer has been shown to improve survival. Improved disease-free survival for colorectal cancer patients treated with either adjuvant capecitabine or oxaliplatin has been demonstrated. MAbs targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary strategies for patients with localised gastrointestinal cancers; and improved systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease are leading to superior patient outcomes. Further improvements are required, and targeted agents may contribute to future progress.

Phase I trial of Orzel (UFT plus leucovorin), cisplatin, and radiotherapy in the treatment of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Fluorinated pyrimidines have been established as radiosensitizers in the combined modality therapy of esophageal cancer. UFT, an oral combination of a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug (uracil) and a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor (ftorafur), may provide improvement in the ease of administration with equal efficacy. This Phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of UFT, leucovorin, and cisplatin when given with radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (Days 1 and 22) and UFT with leucovorin orally on Days 1-35. UFT was escalated in 50-mg/m(2) increments, starting at 200 mg/m(2)/d. Radiotherapy consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions. Patients underwent resection 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Ten patients with resectable esophageal cancer were enrolled. Of the 7 patients entered at dose level 1, 1 developed a dose-limiting toxicity of nausea. All 3 patients entered at dose level 2 developed dose-limiting toxicity. The maximal tolerated dose for UFT was the starting level, 200 mg/m(2)/d. Of the 10 patients enrolled, 8 underwent esophagectomy and 2 developed progressive disease and did not undergo surgery. The disease of 6 of the 8 patients was downstaged at surgery.

CONCLUSION

The recommended UFT dose for Phase II studies is 200 mg/m(2)/d given orally in two divided doses when given with leucovorin, cisplatin, and radiotherapy.

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral tegafur within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in patients with T3-4 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity in terms of downstaging histologic patterns of residual tumor and clinical tolerance of a neoadjuvant chemoradiation program with oral tegafur for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From May 1998 to May 2001, 62 consecutive patients with cT(3-4) or cN(+) rectal cancer, or both, were treated with 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day; 25 fractions) and oral tegafur 1200 mg/day. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. All patients received a boost with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) over the presacral space.

RESULTS

Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity consisted on Grade 3 anemia in 1 patient. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Fifteen patients (23%) had Grade 3 dermatitis, 16 (25%) had Grade 3, and 2 (3%) had Grade 4 proctitis. The median dose of radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. Surgery consisted on anterior resection in 38 patients (61%) and abdominoperineal amputation in 24 (39%). Five complete pathologic responses were observed (8%), and 29 patients (47%) had a minimal microscopic residual tumor (mic category). The total downstaging rate was 68%. With a median follow-up of 46 months, the pelvic control rate was 95%, disease-free survival 74.1%, and overall survival 76.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with oral tegafur is feasible, well tolerated, and active, with the additional advantage of offering the convenience of oral chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

Rectal cancer is one of the most common neoplasms of Western Countries. Overall mortality at 5 years is about 40%. This cancer is commonly diagnosed at a precocious stage, but because of local relapse and/or metastatic disease, only half of radically resected patients can be considered disease free. The value of adding radiotherapy to surgery in the treatment of patients with resectable rectal cancer has been assessed in trials using either preoperative or postoperative irradiation. Preoperative irradiation is more "dose-effective" than postoperative radiotherapy; that is, a higher dose is needed postoperatively to reduce rates of local recurrence to the same extent as preoperative radiation. Nevertheless, preoperative treatment has not been routinely recommended, mainly because it has not been shown to improve overall survival and because in some trials it has been associated with increased postoperative mortality. This paper critically reviews clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy on whether an optimal combination exists for locally advanced rectal cancer. Even if in the latest years, recent advances in surgery have improved the local control of disease, the next steps in rectal cancer care should aim at the improvement of local cure rates and the enhancement of systemic control. New approaches to CT treatment are necessary. Patient enrollment into rigorous and well-conducted clinical trials will generate new information regarding investigational therapies and it will offer improved therapies for patients with this disease.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Surgical resection continues to be the mainstay of treatment for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and radiation) has also been shown to be efficacious. The impact of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation on postoperative complications is unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship of neoadjuvant therapy on postoperative complications in patients undergoing a resection of rectal cancer. A total of 325 patients who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer from 1984 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Only cases with complete data sets who had undergone surgery at this institution were evaluable (257). The patients were divided into groups based on the operative procedure performed; abdominoperineal resection (APR) versus sphincter-sparing (SS) procedures (LAR/Transanal) and whether or not preoperative chemotherapy or radiation was administered. There was no significant difference between complication rates for APR and SS with 19 per cent and 14 per cent, respectively. The preoperative therapy had no effect on complications after APR. However, the SS group showed 21 per cent of the patients who received radiation had complications compared to 11 per cent in those who did not ( P = 0.087). Complications in the SS group included leaks, wound infections, abscess, embolism, cardiac dysrhythmias, and myocardial infarctions. The 30-day mortality was 1.9 per cent for the entire cohort with no clear difference between groups. There was no significant difference in complication rate between APR and SS. In the APR group, neoadjuvant therapy had no impact on the incidence of complications. However, the SS group did show a trend between preoperative chemotherapy and radiation and complication rate. However, this may not outweigh the advantages of preoperative therapy in this setting.

Developments in treatment of primary irresectable rectal cancer

Abstract The treatment options for primary irresectable rectal cancers are discussed. Assessment of tumour stage is the first step for an appropriate choice of treatment. Following a diagnosis of rectal cancer, a vast array of diagnostic procedures is available to determine its stage, and thereby its best treatment options. From the many (new) diagnostic options the merits and drawbacks are discussed. If a diagnosis of irresectability is made, further treatment options should include radiotherapy in most cases, some aspects of timing and application, i.e. intra-operative treatment are discussed. Chemotherapy options are manifold, the results are discussed and some new options are explored.

Preoperative uracil, tegafur, and concomitant radiotherapy in operable rectal cancer: a phase II multicenter study with 3 years' follow-Up

PURPOSE

To assess tolerance and efficacy of preoperative treatment with uracil/tegafur and radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgery and postoperative flurouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) in patients with rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 94) with potentially resectable tumors, ultrasound at stages T2N+ (n = 4), T3 (n = 77), T4 (n = 13) were treated with UFT (400 mg/m2/d, 5 days a week for 5 weeks) and concomitant RT to the pelvis (45 Gy; 1.8 Gy/d over 5 weeks). Patients underwent surgery 5 to 6 weeks later followed by four cycles of FU/LV. Primary end points included downstaging, pathologic responses, and sphincter-preserving surgery. Secondary end points were recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

All patients received the full RT dose. Fifteen patients (16%) needed UFT dose reduction. Preoperative G3+ toxicities included diarrhea (14%), leukopenia (1%), thrombocytopenia (1%), and nausea (4%). The downstaging rate was 54%, pathologic complete response (pCR) was 9% and, in an additional 23%, there were only residual microscopic foci. When cellular viability criteria were taken into account, the pCR was 15%. From 43 patients with abdominoperineal resection indication, 11 (25%) had sphincter-preserving surgery performed. Postoperative scheduled chemotherapy dose was not administered to 24% of patients because of G3+ toxicity (diarrhea, 8%; mucositis, 9%; and leukopenia, 7%). Patients with downstaging had significantly higher survival and recurrence-free survival rates than those without. At 3 years, actuarial patterns of failure were pelvic, 5% and distant, 11%. OS was 75%.

CONCLUSION

UFT combined with RT is safe and effective. In resectable rectal cancer, if preoperative treatment is considered, this approach can be an option.

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin with radiotherapy in patients with inextirpable non-rectal gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of patients with loco-regionally advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may represent a convenient way of delivering protracted infusion of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and a recommended dose for further testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inextirpable GI cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 300 mg/m(2)/d with 50 mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). UFT and LV were given 5 days per week concurrently with radiation to 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated, and 22 received the planned treatment. Three patients were withdrawn from treatment, two due to disease-progression and one due to toxicity. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 400 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhoea was the main dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Since some toxicity (3/12 DLTs) was seen in the expanded cohort at the level below, but none (0/9 DLT) at the starting level, the recommended dose chosen for further testing is 300-350 mg/m(2)/d depending upon the size of the target volume.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated since tumour responses were frequently seen.

Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer--the transatlantic view

In North America there are two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer. First is surgery and, if the tumour is T3 and/or N1-2, this is followed by postoperative combined modality therapy. The second, for patients with ultrasound T3 or clinical T4 disease, is pre-operative combined modality therapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Pre-operative therapy (most commonly combined modality therapy) has gained acceptance as a standard adjuvant therapy. The potential advantages of this approach compared with postoperative therapy include less acute toxicity and enhanced sphincter preservation. Recently completed randomized trials in the US and Germany will provide a definitive answer to this theory. In contrast to the combined modality approach to pre-operative therapy a number of European centres advocate an intensive short course of radiation (5 Gy x 5 followed one week later by surgery). The only randomized trial which has revealed a significant advantage in survival is the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. The Dutch CKVO 95-04 TME trial did not confirm a survival advantage and two metanalyses report conflicting results. Due to selection bias, it is not possible accurately to compare the local recurrence and survival results of intensive short course radiation with conventional pre-operative combined modality therapy. The intensive short course radiation approach is not used in North America due to its higher toxicity and lack of sphincter preservation. In the Dutch trial the 5-year local recurrence was 12% with TME and was significantly decreased to 6% with pre-operative radiation. The 5-year local recurrence rate in the 324 patients with stage III disease who underwent a TME alone with negative margins was 20%. Therefore, despite TME surgery, radiation therapy is still a necessary component in the adjuvant management of rectal cancer.

Advances in combined radiation therapy for the management of rectal cancer

Significant advances have been made in the use of adjuvant radiation for patients with localized rectal cancer. Recent progress in adjuvant postoperative radiation regimens relates to the integration of systemic therapy into radiation, as well as redefining the techniques and sequences for both modalities. The adjuvant radiation management approach in both North America and Europe has been shifting towards preoperative adjuvant therapy to promote sphincter-preserving surgery and to decrease acute and late toxicity. Although 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in combination with radiation remains the standard adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, the integration of novel chemotherapeutic agents and biologic modulators remains an active area of investigation.

Overview of preoperative and postoperative therapy for colorectal cancer: the European and United States perspectives

Surgery is the primary modality for cure in patients with localized colorectal cancer. However, despite potential curative surgery, the risk of recurrence is high. In colon cancer, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) is now established in stage III disease. The benefit of adjuvant treatment in stage II disease is likely to be small, and studies performed thus far have been generally underpowered to detect what might be a clinically significant effect on survival. Whereas bolus scheduling of 5-FU and LV is favored in North America, infusion of 5-FU/LV is preferred in Europe. Indeed, infused 5-FU/LV may be a safer partner with new drugs such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Oral fluoropyrimidines are attractive agents that might one day replace parenteral 5-FU. In rectal cancer, postoperative combined chemoradiation was recommended as standard practice in stages II and III disease. Despite a lack of randomized data demonstrating clinical benefit, preoperative chemoradiation has been increasingly used in patients with T3 disease in North America. However, preoperative radiation therapy is more frequently used in Europe. There are discrepancies in pathologic reporting of circumferential resection margin involvement and lymph node status between the United States and Europe. Standardized reporting with improved preoperative imaging would allow patients with truly early-stage disease to undergo more conservative management and be spared the morbidity and mortality of unnecessary adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment.