Phase II trial combining docetaxel and doxorubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer

A Feasibility Study of Neo-Adjuvant Low-Dose Fractionated Radiotherapy with Two Different Concurrent Anthracycline-Docetaxel Schedules in Stage IIA/B-IIIA Breast Cancer

Aims and Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of neoadjuvant low-dose fractionated radiotherapy, in combination with two anthracycline-docetaxel regimens, in breast cancer treatment.

Materials and Methods

Women with stage IIA/B-IIIA breast cancer were assigned to receive the treatment of low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (0.4 Gy/per fraction, 2 fractions per day, for 2 days, every 21 days for 8–6 cycles) with concomitant neoadjuvant chemotherapy with non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel. Two chemotherapy schedules were planned to be combined with low-dose fractionated radiotherapy. The first schedule consisted of four cycles of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin sequentially followed by four cycles of docetaxel, and the second schedule consisted of six cycles of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus concomitant docetaxel. Acute toxicity was evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score system. Pathological response was evaluated by the Mandard score and expressed as tumor regression grade.

Results

Between March 2008 and February 2009, 10 patients underwent low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. No grade 3–4 breast toxicity was observed. Five patients had a clinical complete response. Seven patients underwent conservative surgery. Overall, tumor regression grade 1 (absence of residual cancer) was achieved in one patient (10%) and grade 2 (residual isolated cells scattered through the fibrosis) in 4 patients (40%). The pathologic major response rate (tumor regression grade 1 + 2) was 20% in patients receiving low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and sequential non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel and 80% in the group receiving low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concurrent non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel treatment.

Conclusions

Concomitant low-dose fractionated radiotherapy combined with anthracycline and docetaxel is feasible. The toxicity profile of radio-chemotherapy was similar to that of chemotherapy alone: there was no acute skin or cardiac toxicity. The concurrent application of liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel with low-dose fractionated radiation led to higher histological response rates compared to the sequential application of the same two drugs.

Kinetic targeting of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: a new approach to reduce toxicity during chemotherapy (CARL-trial)

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic success of chemotherapeutic agents is often limited by severe adverse effects. To reduce toxicity of these drugs, nanoscale particle-based drug delivery systems (DDS) are used. DDS accumulate to some extent in tumor tissues, but only a very small portion of a given dose reaches this target. Accumulation of DDS in tumor tissues is supposed to be much faster than in certain other tissues in which side effects occur ("Kinetic Targeting"). Once saturation in tumor tissue is achieved, most of the administered DDS still circulate in the plasma. The extracorporeal elimination of these circulating nanoparticles would probably reduce toxicity.

METHODS

For the CARL-trial (Controlled Application and Removal of Liposomal chemotherapeutics), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was used as chemotherapeutic agent and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was performed for extracorporeal elimination of liposomes. PLD was given as 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in combination with vinorelbine 2 × 25 mg/m2 (neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer, 12 patients), or as 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (recurrent ovarian cancer, 3 patients). Primary endpoints were the efficiency and safety profile of DFPP, and secondary endpoints were side effects and tumor response.

RESULTS

DFPP eliminated ~62% of circulating PLD, corresponding to ~45% of the total dose (n = 57 cycles). AUC of doxorubicin was reduced by 50%. No leakage of doxorubicin was detected during elimination, and no relevant DFPP-related side effects occurred. Reduction in tumor size > 30% occurred in 10/12 (neoadjuvant) and in 1/3 patients (recurrent). Only five grade 2 events and one grade 3 event (mucositis, neutropenia or leucopenia) and a single palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia grade 2 were reported.

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal elimination of PLD by DFPP is safe and efficient. CARL can diminish the main dose-limiting side effects of PLD, and probably many different DDS alike.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00000163.

Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment

BACKGROUND

Zarzio, a new recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim), was evaluated in healthy volunteers and neutropenic patients in phase I and III studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Healthy volunteers in randomized, two-period crossover studies received single- and multiple-dose s.c. injections of 1 microg/kg (n = 24), 2.5 microg/kg (n = 28), 5 microg/kg (n = 28), or 10 microg/kg (n = 40), as well as single-dose i.v. infusions of 5 microg/kg (n = 26), of Zarzio or the reference product (Neupogen). Filgrastim serum levels were monitored; pharmacodynamic parameters were absolute neutrophil count (all studies) and CD34(+) cells (multiple-dose studies). Supportive efficacy and safety data were obtained from an open phase III study in 170 breast cancer patients undergoing four cycles of doxorubicin and docetaxel (Taxotere) chemotherapy, receiving Zarzio (300 or 480 microg) as primary prophylaxis of severe neutropenia.

RESULTS

The results of the studies in healthy volunteers confirm the comparability of the test and reference products with respect to their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Confidence intervals were within the predefined equivalence boundaries. In the phase III study in breast cancer patients, the administration of Zarzio was efficacious and safe, triggering no immunogenicity.

CONCLUSION

The results of these studies demonstrate the biosimilarity of Zarzio with its reference product Neupogen.

Phase II study of dose-dense doxorubicin and docetaxel as neoadjunvant chemotherapy with G-CSF support in patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the concomitant dose-dense administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as primary chemotherapy for patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients were included and received 50 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin and 75 mg/m(2) of docetaxel every two weeks for four cycles. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony stimulating factor was administered.

RESULTS

Patients included had mainly stage III disease (66%). Efficacy and toxicity analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. After study treatment, the rate of clinical responses was 85% (95% CI: 75-95) with 6% judged as clinical complete responses. Surgery was performed on 94% patients for whom the breast was conserved in 27%. Only one patient obtained a pathological complete response (with no evidence of invasive or non-invasive tumour in the breast and the lymph nodes). In three additional patients, malignant cells were detected only in one lymph node. The single severe haematological toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in one patient (2%) and two cycles (1%), being grade 3 in one and grade 4 in the other. Severe non-haematological toxicities were grade 3, and the most common was asthenia (8% of patients), followed by cutaneous toxicity, arthromyalgia and stomatitis, which occurred in fewer than 4% of patients in each case.

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant dose-dense administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy with granulocyte colony stimulating factor support is a feasible and effective schedule with a safe toxicity profile for women with large or locally advanced breast cancer.

Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy: paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy differ from those of early breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical significance of potential predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 145 stage II and III breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. We examined the clinical and biological factors (ER, PR, p53, c-erbB2, bcl-2, and Ki-67) by immunohistochemistry. We analyzed clinical outcome and their correlation with clinicopathologic parameters.

RESULTS

Among the clinicopathologic parameters investigated, none of the marker was correlated with response rate (RR) except triple negative phenotype. Patients with triple negative phenotype showed higher RR (83.0% in triple negative vs. 62.2% in non-triple negative, p = 0.012) and pathologic complete RR (17.0% in triple negative vs. 3.1% in non-triple negative, p = 0.005). However, relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in triple negative breast cancer patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.021, respectively). Low histologic grade, positive hormone receptors, positive bcl-2 and low level of Ki-67 were associated with prolonged RFS. In addition, positive ER and positive bcl-2 were associated with prolonged OS. In our homogeneous patient population, initial clinical stage reflects RFS and OS more precisely than pathologic stage. In multivariate analysis, initial clinical stage was the only significant independent prognostic factor to impact on OS (hazard ratio 3.597, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Several molecular markers provided useful predictive and prognostic information in stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy. Triple negative phenotype was associated with shorter survival, even though it was associated with a higher response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Pre-administration of docetaxel protects against adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity

BACKGROUND

We have revealed in a pre-clinical study that the combination of adriamycin (ADR) and docetaxel (DOC) in which ADR was administered 12 h after DOC injection not only significantly reduced leukopenia and toxic death but also significantly increased the antitumor effect compared with the dosing schedule without an interval between each injection used commonly in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to clarify in mice whether the toxic death caused by ADR was reduced by administering ADR after DOC injection when the doses and dosing-interval of ADR and DOC were changed.

METHODS

ADR alone or a combination of ADR and DOC (ADR/DOC group in which both drugs were administered simultaneously or DOC-ADR group in which ADR was administered after DOC injection) was administered every 7 days in mice.

RESULTS

When dosing intervals (0-24 h) were changed, there were no differences in survival rate among the 6, 12, and 24-h interval groups, although these groups showed significantly higher survival rate compared with the ADR/DOC group. When the dose of ADR (2.5-15 mg/kg) was changed, the survival rate was higher in all the DOC-ADR groups than the ADR alone groups. When the dose of DOC (3.125-12.5 mg/kg) was changed, DOC caused a dose-dependent reduction in toxic death. Although there was no striking difference in adverse effects between the ADR alone and DOC-ADR groups, the DOC-ADR group showed markedly attenuated increases in CPK-MB activity compared with the ADR alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that pre-administration of DOC may protect against ADR-induced toxic death and cardiotoxicity.

Evaluation of ER and Ki-67 proliferation index as prognostic factors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to identify reliable predictive biological markers for treatment outcome following neoadjuvant adriamycin/docetaxel (AT) chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a phase II study on AT neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients. Patients received 50 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin intravenously (IV) over 15 min followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) infused over 1 h, repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles. Surgery was performed within 3-4 weeks following the last cycle of chemotherapy. We analyzed the pre-treatment and post-treatment expression levels of ER, PgR, HER-2, Ki-67 proliferation index, and p53 and examined the correlation between the markers and clinical parameters with treatment response, overall survival and relapse-free survival following neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

From July 2001 to September 2004, 61 patients were enrolled. The meaningful parameters adversely influencing survival were post-treatment ER(-) status (P = 0.013) and post-treatment Ki-67 index above 1.0% (P = 0.013). At the multivariate level, the post-treatment Ki-67 proliferation index < or = 1.0 was the only meaningful prognostic factor for better survival (P = 0.033). Notably, tumors with Ki-67 index < or = 1.0 were more likely to express ER with statistical significance (P = 0.002). Tumors with ER(+) and Ki-67 index < or = 1.0 showed the highest survival rate, followed by ER(+) and Ki-67 index > 1.0%, ER(-) and Ki-67 < or = 1.0%, and ER(-) and Ki-67 > 1.0% with the worst survival (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Collectively, post-treatment ER status and Ki-67 proliferation index were prognostic of overall survival following neoadjuvant AT chemotherapy.

Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer: A review of clinical trials and perspectives

Primary systemic therapy represents the standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer and has becoming an attractive alternative in earlier stages. A part from the proven advantage of increasing the rate of breast conservative surgery, the up front use of systemic therapy can allow for an in vivo test of treatment sensitivity, and response to primary treatment discriminates patients at different prognosis. This review will summarize the more relevant data on the preoperative treatment with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted agents.

Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Vinorelbine, and Trastuzumab Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Overexpressing Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the combination of docetaxel, vinorelbine, and trastuzumab as neoadjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –overexpressing breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients with stage IIB or III breast cancer, including inflammatory disease, and HER2 overexpression (determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization) were treated with six cycles of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 45 mg/m2 administered every 14 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and quinolone prophylaxis. Trastuzumab was administered as a 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast.

Results

Of 31 enrolled patients, 68% had T3 or T4 tumors and 90% were clinically node positive. Twelve patients (39%; 95% CI, 21.6% to 55.9%) achieved pCR in the breast and lymph nodes and 14 patients (45%; 95% CI, 27.6% to 62.7%) achieved pCR in the breast alone, and 19 patients (61%; 95% CI, 44.1% to 78.4%) were node negative after neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical response was documented in 29 patients (94%; 95% CI, 78.6% to 99.2%) with 26 complete responses (84%; 95% CI, 70.9% to 96.8%). The most commonly reported grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (97%), febrile neutropenia (22%), anemia (6%), mucositis/stomatitis (6%), constipation (6%), and skin rash (6%).

Conclusion

With clinical response and pCR rates of 94% and 39%, respectively, docetaxel, vinorelbine, and trastuzumab is a highly active neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-overexpressing locally advanced breast cancer. Although well tolerated overall, significant febrile neutropenia was observed despite prophylactic measures; therefore, evaluating a similar regimen using lower docetaxel and/or vinorelbine doses is warranted.

Docetaxel/anthracycline combinations for breast cancer treatment

Anthracyclines and taxanes represent the most active group of cytotoxic agents for the treatment of breast cancer. Combining docetaxel with anthracyclines is widely used in the clinic, but, due to an overlap in toxicities this strategy remains somewhat challenging. Combinations of docetaxel with doxorubicin, epirubicin or liposomal doxorubicin in conventional or dose-dense cycles are reviewed in this article. A specific focus is given to the three-drug combination of docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC regimen), as it is registered for the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer. Febrile neutropenia and associated toxicities are frequently associated with the TAC combination. However, when used as primary prophylaxis with granulocyte growth factors, as well as antibiotics, this regimen is considered as a safely-applicable standard option for early breast cancer treatment.

HER-2, p53, p21 and hormonal receptors proteins expression as predictive factors of response and prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus epirubicin combination

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been considered the standard care in locally advanced breast cancer. However, about 20% of the patients do not benefit from this clinical treatment and, predictive factors of response were not defined yet. This study was designed to evaluate the importance of biological markers to predict response and prognosis in stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with taxane and anthracycline combination as neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

Sixty patients received preoperative docetaxel (75 mg/m²) in combination with epirubicin (50 mg/m²) in i.v. infusion in D1 every 3 weeks after incisional biopsy. They received adjuvant chemotherapy with CMF or FEC, attaining axillary status following definitive breast surgery. Clinical and pathologic response rates were measured after preoperative therapy. We evaluated the response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the prognostic significance of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical parameters (ER, PR, p51, p21 and HER-2 protein expression). The median patient age was 50.5 years with a median follow up time 48 months after the time of diagnosis.

Results

Preoperative treatment achieved clinical response in 76.6% of patients and complete pathologic response in 5%. The clinical, pathological and immunohistochemical parameters were not able to predict response to therapy and, only HER2 protein overexpression was associated with a decrease in disease free and overall survival (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.003) as shown by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Immunohistochemical phenotypes were not able to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical response is inversely correlated with a risk of death in patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2 overexpression is the major prognostic factor in stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with a neoadjuvant docetaxel and epirubicin combination.

Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The molecular classification system categorizes invasive breast carcinomas according to their key driving biomarkers. In the current study, the authors evaluated whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with the molecular classification groups.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry, the molecular classification group (luminal-A, luminal-B, HER-2-variant, HER-2-classic, and basal phenotype) was retrospectively determined in 68 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 28 carcinoma patients (41.2%) achieved a compete pathologic response (CPR), including 2 of 15 patients classified as having luminal-A (13.3%), 4 of 16 patients classified as having luminal-B (25.0%), 10 of 12 patients classified as having HER-2-classic (83.3%), none of the 4 patients classified as having HER-2-variant, and 12 of 21 patients classified as having basal phenotype (57.1%) neoplasms. The CPR rate among patients with the HER-2-classic and basal neoplasms was 67% (22 of 33 neoplasms), compared with 17.1% (6 of 35 neoplasms) in the non-HER-2-classic/basal combined group (P < .001). Eleven carcinomas were initially diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinomas (pleomorphic and classic), 4 of which were luminal-A, 4 of which were luminal-B, 2 of which were HER-2-classic, and 1 of which was basal. On review, only 3 of these 11 cases remained classified as classic lobular carcinoma, all of which were classified as luminal-A, and none of these patients achieved a CPR. Four of the other 8 patients achieved a CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

The molecular classification system is useful for identifying carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a CPR. In the current study, all the morphologically classic lobular carcinomas were classified as luminal-A neoplasms, which may explain the low rate of CPR reported.

Predicting response to primary chemotherapy: gene expression profiling of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue

PURPOSE

Primary chemotherapy provides an ideal opportunity to correlate gene expression with response to treatment. We used paraffin-embedded core biopsies from a completed phase II trial to identify genes that correlate with response to primary chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed stage II or III breast cancer were treated with sequential doxorubicin 75 mg/M2 q2 wks x 3 and docetaxel 40 mg/M2 weekly x 6; treatment order was randomly assigned. Pretreatment core biopsy samples were interrogated for genes that might correlate with pathologic complete response (pCR). In addition to the individual genes, the correlation of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score with pCR was examined.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients enrolled in the parent trial, core biopsies samples with sufficient RNA for gene analyses were available from 45 patients; 9 (20%) had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Six (14%) patients achieved a pCR. Twenty-two of the 274 candidate genes assessed correlated with pCR (p < 0.05). Genes correlating with pCR could be grouped into three large clusters: angiogenesis-related genes, proliferation related genes, and invasion-related genes. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-related genes and Recurrence Score did not correlate with pCR. In an exploratory analysis we compared gene expression in IBC to non-inflammatory breast cancer; twenty-four (9%) of the genes were differentially expressed (p < 0.05), 5 were upregulated and 19 were downregulated in IBC.

CONCLUSION

Gene expression analysis on core biopsy samples is feasible and identifies candidate genes that correlate with pCR to primary chemotherapy. Gene expression in IBC differs significantly from noninflammatory breast cancer.

Local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor improves incisional wound healing in adriamycin-treated rats

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant treatment is often given for locally advanced malignancies; however, clinical and experimental studies have shown that some chemotherapeutic agents impair wound healing. It has been reported that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) applied locally improves dermal wound healing. Thus, we investigated the effects of locally injected GM-CSF on abdominal wounds impaired by adriamycin, a widely used chemotherapeutic agent.

METHODS

We divided 120 female Sprague-Dawley rats into five treatment groups of 24 rats. Group 1 received saline 8 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) + laparotomy 14 days later (control); group 2 received 8 mg/kg i.v. adriamycin + laparotomy 14 days later; group 3 received adriamycin 8 mg/kg i.v. + laparotomy + local GM-CSF 50 microg 14 days later; group 4 received saline 8 mg/kg i.v. + laparotomy + local GM-CSF 50 microg 14 days later; and group 5 received adriamycin 8 mg/kg i.v. + laparotomy + systemic GM-CSF 50 microg 14 days later. Sutures were removed on postoperative day (POD) 7 in all five groups, and the abdominal bursting pressures were measured and recorded. Tissue samples were taken from the incision line for histopathological evaluation and hydroxyproline content measurement.

RESULTS

The bursting pressure was significantly lower in groups 2 and 5 than in groups 1, 3, and 4. The hydroxyproline content and histopathological findings supported this result.

CONCLUSION

The local injection of GM-CSF improved impaired wound healing in adriamycin-treated rats.

Doxorubicin and Docetaxel (AT/AD) for Breast Cancer

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy heightens the requirement that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column will review various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy. It will also serve as a review of various agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus doxorubicin (KBCS-01) in stage II, III breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the response and safety of a combination of docetaxel plus doxorubicin as neoadjuvant therapy for stage II, III breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stage II or III breast cancer underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks followed by curative surgery. Prophylactic GCSF was not used.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled in the study and 86 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 43 years (range, 30-69). The mean relative dose intensity was 0.98 for docetaxel and 0.98 for doxorubicin. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 12 (13.7%) patients. The clinical overall response rate was 86% and pathologic complete response was 10.5%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 26% of total 258 cycles and febrile neutropenia was observed in 15.8%. Pneumonia was observed in one patient and grade 3 mucositis was observed in three patients.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel and doxorubicin was an effective and well-tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer. Clinical benefit of this treatment will be confirmed by survival data with long term follow up.

Issues in the assessment of the pathologic effect of primary systemic therapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that induction of pathologic complete response (pCR) after primary systemic therapy (PST) is, at least to some extent, predictive of survival. However, standards for processing surgical specimens and for histopathologic evaluation of the pathologic response to therapy appear to be lacking.

METHODS

To perform a systematic review of representative articles on this topic, a computerized (MEDLINE) search was undertaken followed by a manual search based on the reference lists of the publications identified.

RESULTS

Several classification systems have been used to assess pathologic response to PST, the term pCR has not been applied in a consistent standardized manner, and only limited information is available about the reliability and validity of these classification systems. However, definitions of pCR can be summarized as follows: near pCR, only focal invasive tumor residues in the removed breast; quasi pCR, total or near total disappearance of invasive tumor in the removed breast; pCRinv, only in situ tumor residual in the removed breast; comprehensive pCR, no evidence of residual invasive tumor in the removed breast; strict pCR, disappearance of all tumor cells in the removed breast; comprehensive pCR (br+n), no evidence of residual invasive tumor in the breast and axillary nodes; strict pCR (br+n), no malignant tumor cells in the removed breast and axillary nodes. Comparison of the use of the term "pCR" in various trials reveals that it is not applied equivalently in these studies.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of pCR needs to be standardized, with verification for reliability and validity. For now, the non-equivalency in the definition of pCR should be taken into account when comparing the results of PST.

Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/Vinorelbine Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Women with Stage II/III Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combination of docetaxel plus vinorelbine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III locally advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible women with stage IIA-IIIB or locoregional stage IV breast cancer were treated before surgery with 6 cycles of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 45 mg/m2, repeated every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and quinolone prophylaxis. Pathologic complete response (pCR), viewed as an early surrogate for disease-free and overall survival, was the primary efficacy endpoint. Sixty patients were enrolled; 60% had T3 or T4 lesions, 67% had clinically palpable lymph nodes, and 52% were hormone receptor positive.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were evaluable for pathologic response; 16 (27%) exhibited pCR in the breast alone (T0 Tis NX), 20% exhibited a pCR in the breast and lymph nodes (T0 Tis N0), 24 (41%) had < 5 mm of residual tumor, and 28 (47%) had node-negative disease at surgery. Relative dose intensity was 96% for docetaxel and 95% for vinorelbine. The clinical response rate was 98% (59 of 60 patients), including 38 complete responses (63%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (95%), neutropenic fever (22%), mucositis (5%), and pulmonary toxicity (5%) occurred in >or= 5% of patients. Constipation was seen early but became insignificant after incorporating a prophylactic laxative regimen. Other toxicities have been minimal.

CONCLUSION

With a clinical response rate of 98% and an in-breast pCR rate of 27%, docetaxel/vinorelbine is among the most active neoadjuvant regimens reported for locally advanced breast cancer. Docetaxel/vinorelbine can be administered in a dose-dense fashion while maintaining relative dose intensity. However, there was a significant incidence of fever and neutropenia despite the use of prophylactic growth factors and quinolones, indicating that lower doses of docetaxel/vinorelbine should be evaluated in future studies.

Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine, epirubicin and taxol (GET) in operable breast cancer: a phase II study

This trial was conducted to assess the activity and tolerability of the gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol triplet combination in patients with operable breast cancer. After core biopsy, 43 women with stage II-IIIA breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) over 30 min on days 1 and 4, epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) as an intravenous bolus on day 1, and taxol 175 mg m(-2) as a 3-h infusion on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was the percentage of pathological complete responses (pCR) in the breast; secondary end points were tolerability, clinical response rates, overall and progression-free survival, tumour biomarkers before and after primary chemotherapy (PCT). All patients were included in safety and survival analyses; 41 eligible patients were evaluated for response. The overall clinical response rate was 87.8% (95% CI 77.8-97.8), with 26.8% complete responses (95% CI 13.3-40.3). A pCR in the breast was observed in six patients (14.6%; 95% CI 3.8-25.4); 15 patients (36.6%; 95% CI 21.9-51.3) had negative axillary lymph nodes. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 67.4% of the patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 1.9% of cycles (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 3.2% of the cycles to shorten the duration of neutropenia). A statistically significant difference between Mib-1 at baseline (> or =20% in 71.4% of the patients) and at definitive surgery (28.6%, P < 0.05) was observed. The gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol regimen is active and well tolerated as PCT for operable breast cancer. This combination allows the administration of full doses of active agents with a low incidence of febrile neutropenia.

Sonographic evaluation of early-stage breast cancers that undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

We prospectively evaluated low-stage breast cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy using whole-volume sonography and color Doppler imaging.

METHODS

Thirty-four women with breast cancer (mean maximum size, 2.4 cm) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel. Targeted whole-volume sonography of tumor sites was performed before and after chemotherapy to assess mass size, color pixel speed-weighted density, and American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System sonographic characteristics. After chemotherapy, tumor sites were excised by lumpectomy or mastectomy.

RESULTS

Three (11.3%) of 34 patients had a complete histologic response. After chemotherapy, correlation was r = 0.716 between final histologic and sonographic sizes. Compared with histologic residual tumors, sonography had 4 false-negative results, 3 false-positive results, and 27 true-positive results (sensitivity, 87%), with no false-negative results among a subgroup of tumors of 7 mm and larger (sensitivity, 100%). The 3 cases with false-positive results were histologic fibrosis or biopsy changes. Mean speed-weighted density was 0.015 before and 0.0082 after chemotherapy (P = .03). After chemotherapy, vascularity was less common within (P = .06) or adjacent to (P = .009) masses or in tumor sites (P = .05). Prechemotherapy variables of gray scale characteristics and vascularity were compared with final histologic size, and all had P > .20.

CONCLUSIONS

Postchemotherapy sensitivity of sonography was high for residual tumors of 7 mm or larger. Correlation was moderate between histologic and sonographic final tumor sizes. False-positive results were caused by fibrosis or biopsy-related changes. False-negative results occurred with residual tumor size of 6 mm or smaller. After chemotherapy, vascularity usually decreased, and this was not specific for complete response. Before chemotherapy, no vascular or gray scale feature at initial imaging predicted complete responders.

Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as primary medical therapy in women with breast cancer: an anglo-celtic cooperative oncology group study

PURPOSE To compare the clinical and pathologic response rates of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with doxorubicin and docetaxel (AD) as primary chemotherapy in women with primary or locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with histologically proven breast cancer with primary tumors >/= 3 cm, inflammatory or locally advanced disease, and no evidence of metastases were randomly assigned to receive a maximum of six cycles of either doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks or doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) IV every 3 weeks, followed by surgery on completion of chemotherapy. Results A total of 363 patients were randomly assigned to AC (n = 180) or AD (n = 183). A complete clinical response was observed in 17% and 20% of patients treated with AC and AD, respectively (P = .42). Overall (complete and partial) clinical response rates for AC and AD were 61% and 70%, respectively (P = .06). There was no significant difference in either the pathologic complete response rates in the breast with AC (24%) and AD (21%; P = .61) or in the number of patients with positive axillary nodes at surgery with AC (61%) and AD (66%; P = .28). At a median follow-up of 32 months, there is no significant difference between the two groups for the number of relapses. CONCLUSION In contrast to the positive results reported for sequential docetaxel after AC as primary chemotherapy of breast cancer, our data do not suggest a benefit for simultaneous AD over AC.

Increased Feasibility of Weekly Epirubicin and Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Primary systemic therapy (PST) with a combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel achieves high response rates in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), but considerable toxicity occurs and the patient's compliance is poor. In this open-label phase II trial toxicity of a weekly administration schedule was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

On days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle, 45 patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer received epirubicin (35 mg/m(2), intravenous bolus) followed by paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) in 500 ml of normal saline infused over 3 h) for 3 cycles. Surgery was done 2 weeks after primary chemotherapy, followed by another 6 cycles of adjuvant CEF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 70 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median tumor size before and after PST was 6.0 and 2.0 cm, respectively. The clinical response rate was 96%, including 24% complete remission; 5 patients (11%) achieved pathologically complete response (pCR) including 3 patients with carcinoma in situ. Only 5 (11%) patients underwent breast conserving surgery although there were 15 patients suitable. Axillary nodes were negative in 16 (36%) of the 45 patients. Febrile neutropenia was found in 1 patient. There was no severe cardiac toxicity or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

PST with weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel was an effective and well-tolerated combination for LABC, although only few patients underwent breast conserving surgery.

Primary docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: impact on response and survival

Primary chemotherapy achieves high clinical response rates and facilitates breast conservation in many patients with large and locally advanced breast cancer. It may also serve to indicate responsiveness to chemotherapeutic agents. A pathological complete response to primary chemotherapy is a primary predictor and surrogate marker of long-term outcome, but occurs in only approximately 15% of patients. Docetaxel is of particular interest in this setting. Primary docetaxel chemotherapy has single-agent activity in both dose-dense and traditional schedules, with acceptable tolerability. Furthermore, concomitant docetaxel-anthracycline schedules have shown promise in Phase II trials, achieving clinical overall response rates (ORRs) of 77-96%, pathological complete responses of up to 24%, and breast conservation in up to 89% of patients. Two Phase III studies have shown that pathological complete response is significantly improved with the addition of docetaxel to anthracycline-based therapy versus the latter alone: the Aberdeen study achieved a rate of 34% versus 16%, respectively (p = 0.04), and the NSABP-B27 study a rate of 26% versus 14%, respectively (p < 0.001). The Aberdeen study has suggested that the addition of docetaxel may yield a survival benefit at 5 years (p = 0.04). The Phase II GEPAR-DUO study hints at a benefit for sequential over concomitant docetaxel-based therapy, with improvements in both clinical response (ORR 87% versus 77%, respectively) and pathological complete response (23% versus 12%, respectively). Non-anthracycline docetaxel-based primary regimens have shown early promise. As we continue to define the optimal regimen, a growing body of evidence supports the use of docetaxel in primary chemotherapeutic regimens for breast cancer.

Randomized phase II trial of the anti-angiogenic potential of doxorubicin and docetaxel; primary chemotherapy as Biomarker Discovery Laboratory

PURPOSE

Primary chemotherapy provides an ideal opportunity to correlate potential non-invasive surrogate markers of angiogenesis with tumor microvessel density (MVD) and response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed stages II or III breast cancer were treated with sequential doxorubicin 75 mg/M2 q2 wks x 3 and docetaxel 40 mg/M2 weekly x 6; treatment order was randomly assigned. Potential serologic and imaging markers of angiogenesis were obtained pre-treatment, at crossover and completion of chemotherapy. Non-invasive biomarkers were correlated with MVD and pathologic response.

RESULTS

From June 1999 to October 2002, 70 patients were entered. Median pretreatment tumor diameter was 6.0 cm with clinically involved axillary nodes in 33 (47%) patients; 20% had inflammatory disease. Clinical response rate was 91%, including 46% clinical complete responses. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was confirmed in 9 (12.8%) patients. Baseline MVD did not correlate with clinical or pathologic response. Serologic markers were obtained in all patients; basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was lower at baseline and increased during treatment in patients with a pCR but did not correlate with MVD. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) was completed in 47 patients; no parameter reliably correlated with MVD or response. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [F-18]-fluoro-deoxyglucose, [O-15]-water and [C-11]-carbon monoxide were completed in 19 patients; uptake of all tracers decreased during treatment in virtually all patients.

CONCLUSION

Sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel is generally well tolerated and highly active. Serum angiogenic factors and imaging parameters frequently varied throughout treatment but did not correlate with MVD or consistently predict response.

Cardiac toxicity assessment in locally advanced breast cancer treated neoadjuvantly with doxorubicin/paclitaxel regimen

BACKGROUND

The psychological difficulty of accepting a mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) justifies the use of chemotherapy as neoadjuvant primary treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of the doxorubicin/paclitaxel (AT) schedule neoadjuvantly administered in terms of response rates and survival in patients with LABC, with a special focus on cardiac toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

All patients were treated by doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 i.v.) bolus followed by paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) as a 3-h infusion. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for four or six courses and followed by surgery, radiotherapy, and hormonotherapy for patients with positive hormonal receptors. Patients with significant cardiovascular history or ECG abnormalities were not eligible for the study. Measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were performed at baseline and at the end of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2001, 34 consecutive patients followed up in our institution were entered into this study. Median age was 49 years (range, 32-68 years). Seventeen patients had stage IIB, 5 patients stage IIIA, and 12 patients stage IIIB disease. Twenty-one patients underwent conservative surgery, 7 radical surgery, and 6 patients no surgery due to metastatic disease occurring during treatment. An objective clinical response was noted in 22 (65%) of 34 patients (6 patients with histological complete response, 10 patients with rare malignant cells, and 6 patients with a partial response), 6 patients presented a progressive disease, and 8 patients a stable disease. Twenty-four patients have kept normal cardiac function, 7 patients had a cardiac toxicity as defined by the institution [4 (24%) of 17 patients received 360 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (A), 2 of 4 presented congestive heart failure (CHF), and 3 (21%) of 14 patients received 240 mg/m(2) of A without CHF]. Three patients did not receive four or six cycles as initially planned due to the progressive disease during the chemotherapy courses. These patients were excluded from the final analysis, particularly cardiac toxicity analysis. At time of median follow-up (42 months), 28 of 34 patients were alive (one death due to CHF, five others due to progressive disease).

CONCLUSION

The AT regimen in neoadjuvant treatment for LABC remains efficient, but cardiac toxicity reported in this study underlies the necessity to optimize the schedule of AT combination.

Pathologic Features of Breast Cancer Associated With Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Breast cancer patients with a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a better prognosis than incomplete responders. The predictive value of the histologic characteristics of the tumor prior to neoadjuvant treatment has not been well defined, and there are no guidelines for reporting tumor characteristics in the core biopsy report. Histologic and nuclear grades, presence of tumor necrosis and angiolymphatic invasion (ALI), and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2/neu expression were assessed in core biopsies of 55 patients with invasive carcinomas. Patients were then uniformly treated with four cycles of doxorubicin/docetaxel followed by excisions and lymph node dissections. Complete pathologic response (pCR) was defined as having no invasive carcinoma at excision. Noncomplete pathologic response was defined as having invasive carcinoma at excision. Five of the 55 patients (9%) achieved pCR. Of the 5 complete responders, 4 (80%) had tumor necrosis in the core biopsy specimens, while only 8 of the 46 (17%) noncomplete responders (pNR) had this feature (P = 0.0086). Higher histologic and nuclear grades, ER, PR status, and HER-2/neu overexpression were not associated with pCR. The presence of ALI in the core biopsy, post-therapy excision, or both was associated with axillary lymph node metastases (P = 0.0062, P = 0.0249, and P = 0.0021, respectively). Although preliminary, our study suggests that the presence of tumor necrosis and ALI in the core biopsy may be important features to be included in the standard report.

Docetaxel as adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer

Developments in the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with breast cancer have focused on the taxes, in particular, docetaxel. This paper discusses the rationale for the introduction of docetaxel into the management of patients following surgery and also its role in those patients with locally-advanced disease, focussing on key clinical trials. The addition of docetaxel to standard adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens does seem to result in an increased survival in some patients with early-stage disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, the addition of docetaxel to standard regimens does increase pathological response rates, which is a surrogate marker of eventual outcome.

Primary chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in operable breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Primary chemotherapy (PC) is becoming an accepted practice to treat large tumors to avoid mastectomies and as a surrogate of outcome.

METHODS

A series of 305 patients with tumors >3 cm with T2-3N0-1M0 classification were treated with a multimodal approach that consisted of 3 courses of primary cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) followed by appropriate local treatment and 3 more courses of CMF or 4 courses of doxorubicin. Response was assessed by mammography.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 48% (a 3% pathologic complete response rate). Conservative surgery was achieved in 79.64% of the patients with a low rate of local disease recurrences (5%). Toxicity was minimal. With a median follow-up of 104 months, the 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 57.63% and the 8-year overall survival (OS) was 67.65%. The DFS and OS rates for patients with a clinical response were significantly longer, i.e., 70% (P=0.0048) and 90% (P=0.0042), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PC with CMF was feasible. A high rate of breast-conservative surgery was achieved. The current results stressed the value of PC to increase conservative surgery and as a predictor of outcome.

Docetaxel and high-dose epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

Epirubicin and docetaxel are two of the most active drugs against breast carcinoma. As the achievement of a pathological complete response (pCR) is important for survival of patients with locally advanced disease, we used both drugs as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer received epirubicin 120 mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles. Lenograstim was administered for 10 days in all cycles.

RESULTS

Of 51 patients included, 50 received a total of 188 cycles, with a median of 4 per patient. The median age was 47 years, tumour stage was IIIA in 14 patients and IIIB in 36. Oestrogen receptors were positive in 65% of tumours. There were 10 clinical complete responses (20%) and 29 partial responses (58%). Surgery consisted of mastectomy in 40 patients and tumorectomy in 6. After surgery, 9 pCR were recorded (18%). One patient progressed and died soon after the end of chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 22 months, the median disease-free survival was 33.7 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 32% of patients, anaemia in 6%, and thrombocytopenia in 4%. Five patients had febrile neutropenia. There were no toxic deaths or grade 4 nonhaematological toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel plus high-dose epirubicin showed promising activity in patients with locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, at the cost of moderate toxicity.