A phase II trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in locally advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

SIU-ICUD recommendations on bladder cancer: systemic therapy for metastatic bladder cancer

The SIU (Société Internationale d'Urologie)-ICUD (International Consultation on Urologic Diseases) working group on systemic therapy for metastatic bladder cancer has summarized the most recent findings on the aforementioned topic and came to conclusions and recommendations according to the evidence published. In Europe and the United States, treatment for metastatic UC has changed a great deal recently, mainly involving a move from chemotherapy to immune checkpoint blockers. This is particularly true in platinum-refractory disease, where supportive randomized data exist. Five checkpoint blockers have been approved in this setting by the FDA: avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab have been approved in Europe.

Unusually prolonged pemetrexed cytotoxicity in a patient with a lung adenocarcinoma: a case report

Background

We describe a case of pemetrexed toxicities related to reabsorption by an ileal neobladder, which caused prolonged hematotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old white man was diagnosed with metastatic wild-type adenocarcinoma of the upper lobe of his right lung. After a first cycle of cisplatin and pemetrexed, he had unusually prolonged aplasia and acute kidney injury.

The prolonged aplasia was caused by pemetrexed reabsorption by the ileal mucosa of the neobladder as pemetrexed was eliminated renally in an active form and is partly lipophilic.

Conclusions

Pemetrexed may be reabsorbed by the ileal mucosa of the neobladder because of its hydrophobic structure and renal excretion in its active form. Acute urinary retention may maintain this phenomenon. Published data excluded a potential role for cisplatin in this toxicity; furthermore, we could not assess pemetrexed concentrations in the blood or urine as these assay techniques are not validated. Thus, care is needed when giving chemotherapy to patients with a neobladder.

New Strategies in Bladder Cancer: A Second Coming for Immunotherapy

Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) remains one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide, and platinum-based chemotherapy, which has been the standard-of-care in metastatic bladder cancer, has had limited success in improving outcomes for patients. The recent development and translation of therapeutic strategies aimed at harnessing the immune system have led to durable and prolonged survival for patients with several different cancers, including UBC. In this review, we discuss new findings in bladder cancer immunotherapy, including recent successes with immune checkpoint blockade. We also discuss therapeutic cancer vaccines and highlight several additional immunotherapy modalities in early stages of development.

The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine for the treatment of bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a common type of cancer with an estimated incidence of more than 70,000 patients and had a mortality of 16,000 patients in the US in 2015. In more than 70% of cases the disease is diagnosed at the non-muscle invasive stage. However, muscle invasive or metastatic stages need multimodal treatment strategies including surgical treatment and chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant, adjuvant or palliative setting. Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine antimetabolite that has shown efficacy when used systemically in bladder cancer with only mild toxicity compared to other chemotherapeutic agents. This article aims to summarize the results of clinical trials in monotherapeutic, combined or sequential treatment strategies, especially considering efficacy and safety of the different therapeutic regimes.

A Case of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Pemetrexed as Third-Line Chemotherapy with Discussion and Literature Review

Pemetrexed is an antifolate agent that is regarded as an alternative second-line chemotherapy against advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, there is limited information on pemetrexed in a third-line setting. We report a case of metastatic UC treated with pemetrexed as third-line chemotherapy following gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) and gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) therapies. A 73-year-old man with a history of transurethral resection of bladder carcinoma presented with pollakiuria. CT revealed a mass in the left renal pelvis that had invaded into the parenchyma of the left kidney, as well as para-aortic and mediastinum lymph node enlargement. Urinary cytology of the lesion in the left renal pelvis revealed UC. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with left renal pelvic carcinoma (cT3N2M0). After having received 4 courses of GC therapy, another mediastinum lymph node was enlarged. He subsequently received 3 courses of GD therapy as second-line chemotherapy, which showed little efficacy against the metastatic lesions. The patient was administered 3 courses of pemetrexed as third-line chemotherapy; however, its effect on tumor reduction was not sufficient. Finally, metastasis to the liver was observed, and he died 21 months after initiation of chemotherapy. For pathological confirmation, needle biopsy of a metastatic lymph node performed after death revealed high-grade UC and a high positivity of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the tumor, which suggested that he could have benefited from anti-PD-L1 antibody immunotherapy. This report describes the outcome of pemetrexed treatment and proposes another possible candidate as third-line chemotherapy against metastatic UC.

The safety and efficacy of single-agent pemetrexed in platinum-resistant advanced urothelial carcinoma: a large single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed is a commonly used treatment for platinum-resistant advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) based on objective response rates of 8% and 28% in two small phase II studies. To address the discrepancy in reported response rates and to assess efficacy and toxicity outside of a clinical trial setting, we performed a large retrospective analysis of pemetrexed use at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We also investigated candidate prognostic factors for overall survival in this setting to explore whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) had independent prognostic significance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving pemetrexed for platinum-resistant advanced UC between 2008 and 2013 were identified. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) were used to determine response rate. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to examine the association of various factors with efficacy and survival outcomes. Hematologic toxicity and laboratory abnormalities were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients were treated with pemetrexed. The objective response rate was 5% (95% confidence interval: 1%-9%), and the median duration of response was 8 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months, and the 6-month PFS rate was 14%. There was no significant difference in response rate by age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, or number of prior therapies. On multivariable analysis, ECOG performance status (p < .01), liver metastases (p = .02), and NLR (p < .01) had independent prognostic significance for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

This 129-patient series is the largest reported data set describing pemetrexed use in advanced UC. Activity was modest, although discovery of molecular biomarkers predictive of response would be valuable to identify the small subset of patients who do gain significant benefit. Overall, the data highlight the urgent need to develop novel therapies for these patients.

Phase II study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: the PECULIAR study (KCSG 10-17)

Background:

Pemetrexed has shown a favourable response rate of about 30% with minimal toxicity when used as a single agent for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Methods:

This multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial enrolled patients who had advanced urothelial carcinoma, ECOG PS 0–2, and measurable disease. Pemetrexed 500 mg m⁻² with cisplatin 70 mg m⁻² on day 1 were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results:

A total of 42 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; ECOG 0–1, 100% visceral metastasis, 54.8% recurrent disease, 57.1%). Twenty-seven partial responses for an ORR of 64.3% (95% CI, 49.2%–77.0%) were documented. Seven patients had stable disease. Median PFS and OS were 6.9 (95% CI, 6.2–7.6) and 14.4 (95% CI, 10.4–18.4) months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 28.6% of patients. No patients experienced febrile neutropenia.

Conclusion:

The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin is active, and well tolerated in patients with advanced urothelial cancer as a first-line treatment.

Phase II trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced and metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical activity and safety of the combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in advanced nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC).

METHODS

In this phase II study, patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m intravenous infusion over 10 minutes on day 1 followed immediately by gemcitabine 1500 mg/m intravenously over 30 minutes on day 1, with cycles repeated every 14 days. Planned enrollment was 40 patients. The primary endpoints were objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between December 2005 and December 2008, 16 patients with locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC were enrolled. The trial was stopped early due to low efficacy and excessive toxicity. The objective response rate was 0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0%-18%]. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range, 1 to 12). Median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.9-6+), and the 16-week PFS rate was 46.7% (95% CI, 19.8%-100%). Median overall survival was 23.2 months (95% CI, 12.9-38.1). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (53%), leukopenia (53%), anemia (13%), fatigue (40%), and renal insufficiency (13%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase II trial in nccRCC, the combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine was toxic and ineffective. Further development of this regimen in nccRCC is not warranted.

Recent advances in treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma

GC (cisplatin and gemcitabine) and MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, Adriamycin [doxorubicin], and cisplatin) have been the standard systemic chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. These regimens have shown significant response rates in this patient population. Nevertheless, disease does recur with most patients who unfortunately do succumb to the disease. Research efforts are focused in several different areas of therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Further efforts include those in improving understanding of the molecular biology of urothelial carcinoma which may lead development of biomarkers that may enhance therapeutic index. This paper reviews recent advances in the treatment and ongoing study of molecular biology of urothelial carcinoma.

Choosing chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cell cancer who are unfit to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract is the second most common cancer of the genitourinary system and the fifth most common cancer in Western countries with more than 300,000 new cases per year worldwide. Following the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, median overall survival in patients with metastatic disease has doubled, demonstrating chemotherapy as an important treatment modality in advanced or metastatic disease. Patients 'unfit' to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy are characterized by impaired renal function, impaired performance status, and/or comorbidity that preclude the use of cisplatin. In this review we summarize the different chemotherapeutic schemes, focusing on treatment options in cisplatin 'unfit' patients.

New agents for bladder cancer

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is an aggressive disease with at least 50% of patients dying from metastases within 2 years of diagnosis. The 5-year survival rate for metastatic bladder cancer is <15%. Although modern combination chemotherapy regimens have improved median survival from 6 to 14 months compared with best supportive care, there is still a great opportunity for improvement. New therapies and strategies for better patient and treatment selection are now being investigated for advanced bladder cancer. These include agents that target several pathways involved in the pathogenesis of the disease--such as growth factor receptors, angiogenic pathways, p53, cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis--as well as novel chemotherapeutic agents. Results from recent and ongoing trials suggest that some of these agents could soon emerge as useful players to overcome the limitations of our present therapies.

Gemcitabine chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic bladder carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

• To systematically review the literature on gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Onlinedatabase (MEDLINE), the Excerpta Medicadatabase (EMBASE), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database(CIHNAL), the Cochrane database of randomized trials, the Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe emCiências da Saúdedatabase (LILACS), and Web of Science were searched to identify trials of gemcitabine for metastatic bladder cancer. Also searched were international guidelines on metastatic prostate cancer, trial registries, and recent systematic reviews. Data on trial design, survival, tumour response and toxicity outcomes were extracted from relevant studies.

RESULTS

• This review identified six randomized trials of combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine for the management of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. • One trial compared gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GCis) with methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin(MVAC) and found no difference in overall survival (OS; hazard ratio 1.09) but a better safety profile with GCis, which was suggested as the treatment of choice. • A second trial evaluated GCis against gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCarbo) and reported similar median OS (12.8 vs 9.8 months), disease progression (8.3 vs 7.3 months) and tumour response rates (66% vs 56%) for the two patient groups. • A third trial compared GCis with GCis plus paclitaxel (GCisPac) and showed no significant difference in median OS (12.3 vs 15.3 months) and response rates (44% vs 43%) but greater toxicity with GCisPac. • A fourth trial assessed GCarbo against methotrexate plus carboplatin plus vinblastine in patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and found similar tumour response rates for each regime (38% vs 20%) but the triplet regime was more toxic. • Two other randomized studies compared a 2-weekly maintenance regime of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel with a 3-weelky regime given for a maximum of six cycles and found that the maintenance schedule did not confer any additional survival benefit. • In all, 53 observational studies of gemcitabine chemotherapy were identified that varied considerably in the drug combinations used and schedules. Overall response rates (17-78%) and median OS (6.4-24.0 months) were variable with no combination being clearly superior.

CONCLUSIONS

• Gemcitabine combined chemotherapy is active in the management of metastatic bladder cancer. • GCis may be considered an alternative regime to MVAC. • GCarbo should be considered for patients unfit for cisplatin-based therapy.

Chemotherapy in advanced bladder cancer: current status and future

Bladder cancer occurs in the majority of cases in males. It represents the seventh most common cancer and the ninth most common cause of cancer deaths for men. Transitional cell carcinoma is the most predominant histological type. Bladder cancer is highly chemosensitive. In metastatic setting, chemotherapy based on cisplatin should be considered as standard treatment of choice for patients with good performance status (0-1) and good renal function-glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min. The standard treatment is based on cisplatin chemotherapy regimens type MVAC, HD-MVAC, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or dose dense GC. In unfit patients, carboplatin based regimes; gemcitabine plus carboplatin or methotrexate plus carboplatin plus vinblastine (MCAVI) are reasonable options. The role of targeted therapies when used alone, or in combination with chemotherapy, or in maintenance, was evaluated; targeting angiogenesis seem to be very promising. The purpose of this literature review is to highlight the role of chemotherapy in the management of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Current therapeutic strategies for invasive and metastatic bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers in Europe, the United States, and Northern African countries. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is an aggressive epithelial tumor, with a high rate of early systemic dissemination. Superficial, noninvasive bladder cancer can most often be cured; a good proportion of invasive cases can also be cured by a combined modality approach of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Recurrences are common and mostly manifest as metastatic disease. Those with distant metastatic disease can sometime achieve partial or complete remission with combination chemotherapy.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Better understanding of the biology of the disease has led to the incorporation of molecular and genetic features along with factors such as tumor grade, lympho-vascular invasion, and aberrant histology, thereby allowing identification of 'favorable' and 'unfavorable' cancers which helps a more accurate informed and objective selection of patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Gene expression profiling has been used to find molecular signature patterns that can potentially be predictive of drug sensitivity and metastasis. Understanding the molecular pathways of invasive bladder cancer has led to clinical investigation of several targeted therapeutics such as anti-angiogenics, mTOR inhibitors, and anti-EGFR agents.

CONCLUSION

With improvements in the understanding of the biology of bladder cancer, clinical trials studying novel and targeted agents alone or in combination with chemotherapy have increased the armamentarium for the treatment of bladder cancer. Although the novel biomarkers and gene expression profiles have been shown to provide important predictive and prognostic information and are anticipated to be incorporated in clinical decision-making, their exact utility and relevance calls for a larger prospective validation.

Personalized therapy for urothelial cancer: review of the clinical evidence

Despite a detailed understanding of the molecular aberrations driving the development of urothelial cancers, this knowledge has not translated into advances for the treatment of this disease. Urothelial cancers are chemosensitive, and platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for advanced disease, as well as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease. However, nearly half of patients who undergo resection of locally advanced urothelial cancer will relapse and eventually develop platinum-resistant disease. Clinical trials of targeted agents against angiogenesis and growth factors, as well as novel chemotheraputics, have generally been unsuccessful in urothelial cancers. Improvements in the theraputic arsenal for urothelial cancer depend upon identification of new targets and strategies to overcome platinum resistance.

Advanced bladder cancer: new agents and new approaches. A review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present paper is to review findings from the most relevant studies and evaluate the potential of new drugs in treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and Pubmed databases up to 2009 using both medical subject heading (Mesh) and a free text strategy with the name of known individual chemotherapeutic drug and the following key words: 'muscle-invasive bladder cancer', 'urothelial/transitional carcinoma', 'chemotherapeutics drugs and agents'. At the end of our research in literature we selected 63 articles and we have considered only studies in which almost 30 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the gold standard of treatment for clinically localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. While more extensive lymph node dissection may have both prognostic and therapeutic significance, effective systemic therapies that eliminate micrometastases may improve outcome. Perioperative chemotherapy can be administered before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) cystectomy to eradicate subclinical disease and to improve survival.

CONCLUSION

The challenge remains as to how to integrate all of the relevant knowledge and data in a systematic manner so that researchers can gain the knowledge needed to devise the best therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. Future improvements in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer will rely not only on the optimization of currently available cytotoxic agents but also on the biologic profile of individual patient tumors and the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy.

Current chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer: a review

Advanced bladder cancer is a disease with a high recurrence rate and metastatic capacity exhibiting a poor outcome. The pathologic stage and nodal involvement are independent prognostic factors for survival after cystectomy, and in locally advanced or metastatic disease, the performance status and the presence of visceral metastases have been correlated with treatment outcome. The regimen methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin (MVAC) has been the treatment of choice for decades and later the combination of cisplatin with gemcitabine became also the new standard of care, by demonstrating a more favorable toxicity profile. Also, carboplatin-gemcitabine and taxanes have been useful alternatives for patients unfit for cisplatin-based treatment. Additionally, the evaluation of certain chemotherapeutic agents has produced promising results in the second-line setting. Lastly, the past decade has provided information on the molecular mechanism of bladder cancer offering a personalized approach and optimizing the management of the disease.

[Chemotherapy in unfit bladder cancer patients]

Bladder cancer often occurs in patients with high risk of acute toxicity under chemotherapy. So-called unfit patients are a heterogenous population, sharing a contra-indication for cisplatin and presenting either chronic renal failure, and/or elderly, and/or altered performance status, and/or severe co-morbidities. Therefore, it is necessary to develop chemotherapy protocols feasible in renal insufficient patients, and well tolerated in frail patients. The medical evaluation prior to initiate chemotherapy is of major importance to screen for chronic disorders and to anticipate the potential acute complications following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy of elderly patients with severe comorbidities is a common situation in bladder cancer, and will concern all cancer patients. The evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio of the chemotherapy protocol is a typical expertise of medical oncologists, which requires to integrate the complex links between the patient, the antitumor agent, and toxicity. The physician must also have a honest dialogue to inform, advise, listen to the patients priorities. Medical oncologists have to have in mind this situation and to adapt their clinic and their vocabulary to this emerging reality.

Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone after a platinum-containing regimen in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract

PURPOSE

Vinflunine (VFL) is a new microtubule inhibitor that has activity against transitional cell carcinoma of urothelial tract (TCCU). We conducted a randomized phase III study of VFL and best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in the treatment of patients with advanced TCCU who had experienced progression after a first-line platinum-containing regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was designed to compare overall survival (OS) between patients receiving VFL + BSC (performance status [PS] = 0: 320 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks; PS = 0 with previous pelvic radiation and PS = 1: 280 mg/m(2) subsequently escalated to 320 mg/m(2)) or BSC.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned (VFL + BSC, n =253; BSC, n = 117). Both arms were well balanced except there were more patients with PS more than 1 (10% difference) in the BSC arm. Main grade 3 or 4 toxicities for VFL + BSC were neutropenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (6%), anemia (19%), fatigue (19%), and constipation (16%). In the intent-to-treat population, the objective of a median 2-month survival advantage (6.9 months for VFL + BSC v 4.6 months for BSC) was achieved (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.12) but was not statistically significant (P = .287). Multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for prognostic factors showed statistically significant effect of VFL on OS (P = .036), reducing the death risk by 23% (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.98). In the eligible population (n = 357), the median OS was significantly longer for VFL + BSC than BSC (6.9 v 4.3 months, respectively), with the difference being statistically significant (P = .040). Overall response rate, disease control, and progression-free survival were all statistically significant favoring VFL + BSC (P = .006, P = .002, and P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

VFL demonstrates a survival advantage in second-line treatment for advanced TCCU. Consistency of results exists with significant and meaningful benefit over all efficacy parameters. Safety profile is acceptable, and therefore, VFL seems to be a reasonable option for TCCU progressing after first-line platinum-based therapy.

Novel agents for advanced bladder cancer

Conventional front-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy yields high response rates but suboptimal long-term outcomes for advanced transitional cell carcinoma. Salvage therapy is an unmet need with disappointing outcomes. The emergence of novel biologic agents offers the promise of improved outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy preceding cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer provides an important paradigm and an interesting approach in developing novel agents. Patients who are not candidates for cisplatin require special attention. A multidisciplinary approach and collaboration among laboratory scientists, oncologists, urologists and radiation oncologists is necessary to make therapeutic advances. Recent and ongoing trials of novel chemotherapeutic and biologic agents are reviewed.

Novel therapeutics in metastatic bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Albeit transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder is a chemosensitive neoplasm, metastatic disease is related with poor prognosis and short-term survival data.

OBJECTIVE

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is recognised as the golden standard therapy for patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. However, owing to treatment-related toxicities and short-response durations, novel treatment options or agents, with both enhanced efficacy and tolerability, have been sought.

METHODS

Reviewing the current status and addressing the future of novel anticancer therapeutics in metastatic urinary bladder cancer.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Non-platinum, single agents, such as gemcitabine and taxanes, as well as multidrug regimens in doublet or triplet chemotherapeutic combinations are regarded as promising alternatives. Dose intensification of conventional regimens, dose-dense sequential administration of new agents, the use of molecular markers for predicting chemosensitivity and the integration of biologically targeted agents to enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy are promising approaches.

Treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer: opportunities for drug discovery and development

Conventional first-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin and standard or dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin yields high response rates but suboptimal long-term outcomes for advanced urothelial cancer. Salvage therapy is an unmet need, with disappointing outcomes. The emergence of novel biological agents offers the promise of improved outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy preceding cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer provides an important paradigm and an interesting approach in developing novel agents. Patients who are not candidates for cisplatin require special attention. A multidisciplinary approach and collaboration among laboratory scientists, oncologists, urologists and radiation oncologists is necessary to make therapeutic advances. Recent and ongoing trials of novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents are reviewed.

The evolving role of chemotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced urothelial cancer, with a look towards the future and the next generation of clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recognition that the maximum benefit from conventional combination chemotherapy has been achieved has led to recent initiation of clinical trials evaluating novel agents, targeted agents and the possibility of customizing chemotherapy on the basis of the chemosensitivity.

SUMMARY

Randomized trials have demonstrated that cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy can be considered the standard treatment for fit patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. However, several newer regimens have failed to demonstrate superiority in terms of overall survival when compared to classic methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC). The addition of a third agent to doublet combinations is still uncertain. New drugs including pemetrexed and vinflunine are now being studied for second-line therapy. Progress in the understanding of the molecular biology of bladder cancer and identification of new targeted therapies will provide new opportunities. In addition to newer drug combinations, tailoring of chemotherapy on the basis of molecular characteristics to predict chemosensitivity will provide new challenges.

Phase 2 trial of pemetrexed disodium and gemcitabine in advanced urothelial cancer (E4802): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

There is a need to identify active new regimens in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Pemetrexed and gemcitabine are active agents in advanced urothelial cancer. A phase 2 trial of the combination of these 2 agents was performed in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who were previously untreated for metastatic disease.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma received pemetrexed disodium 500 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1, with gemcitabine repeated on Day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Two patients attained a complete response, and 12 patients attained a partial response for an overall response rate of 31.8% (90% confidence interval, 20.4%-45.2%). The median time to disease progression was 5.8 months, and the median overall survival was 13.4 months. Thirty-three patients (75%) experienced grade>or=3 neutropenia, and 5 patients (11%) had febrile neutropenia. There were 2 therapy-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine had moderate antitumor activity in previously untreated patients with advanced urothelial cancer at the expense of significant myelosuppression.

New developments in first- and second-line chemotherapy for transitional cell, squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the systemic treatment, patient selection and treatment outcome of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, focusing on advances and findings within the last year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for transitional cell carcinoma. In recent updates of randomized trials, patients with favorable prognostic factors were shown to have a chance of long-term disease-free survival even after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patient selection for cisplatin, newer drugs or alternative combinations is crucial. New genetic markers like excision repair cross-complementing 1 expression were developed and tested for this purpose. Adequate evaluation of renal function plays an important role for treatment selection, especially in the elderly population. Newer chemotherapeutics like oxaliplatin, vinflunine and pemetrexed have been studied in the first- or second-line settings. Their efficacy is promising, but there is still a need for further testing. Only few data are available on the systemic treatment of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Complete resection seems to be more important than chemotherapy in the rare cases of adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract.

SUMMARY

In locally advanced and metastatic disease patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors and predictive factors for response to treatment will guide treatment decisions in the future.

Bladder cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer with an emphasis on studies and developments over the past year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cystoscopy remains the mainstay in the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer, though efforts continue in the development of urinary bladder cancer markers. Superficial bladder cancer continues to be managed predominantly through transurethral resection with perioperative instillation of chemotherapy recommended for most patients. Intravesical bacille Calmette-Guerin (including a maintenance regimen) should be used for those at high risk for progression. Muscle invasive disease continues to be managed by radical cystectomy. Research continues on the use of laparoscopy, the effect on patient's health-related quality of life, and the potential role for bladder preservation strategies. The role of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy around the time of cystectomy remains to be resolved. The mainstays of chemotherapy remain methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin, and gemcitabine and cisplatin, but work is ongoing to develop new regimens, especially in patients who cannot take cisplatin.

SUMMARY

Although great strides continue to be made each year in the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer considerably more work needs to be done in order to improve the lives of our patients with this disease.