Digital PCR quantification of ultrahigh ERBB2 copy number identifies poor breast cancer survival after trastuzumab

HER2/ERBB2 evaluation is necessary for treatment decision-making in breast cancer (BC), however current methods have limitations and considerable variability exists. DNA copy number (CN) evaluation by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has complementary advantages for HER2/ERBB2 diagnostics. In this study, we developed a single-reaction multiplex ddPCR assay for determination of ERBB2 CN in reference to two control regions, CEP17 and a copy-number-stable region of chr. 2p13.1, validated CN estimations to clinical in situ hybridization (ISH) HER2 status, and investigated the association of ERBB2 CN with clinical outcomes. 909 primary BC tissues were evaluated and the area under the curve for concordance to HER2 status was 0.93 and 0.96 for ERBB2 CN using either CEP17 or 2p13.1 as reference, respectively. The accuracy of ddPCR ERBB2 CN was 93.7% and 94.1% in the training and validation groups, respectively. Positive and negative predictive value for the classic HER2 amplification and non-amplification groups was 97.2% and 94.8%, respectively. An identified biological "ultrahigh" ERBB2 ddPCR CN group had significantly worse survival within patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab for both recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, HR: 3.3; 95% CI 1.1-9.6; p = 0.031, multivariable Cox regression) and overall survival (HR: 3.6; 95% CI 1.1-12.6; p = 0.041). For validation using RNA-seq data as a surrogate, in a population-based SCAN-B cohort (NCT02306096) of 682 consecutive patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab, the ultrahigh-ERBB2 mRNA group had significantly worse survival. Multiplex ddPCR is useful for ERBB2 CN estimation and ultrahigh ERBB2 may be a predictive factor for decreased long-term survival after trastuzumab treatment.

Prognostic impact of HER2 biomarker levels in trastuzumab-treated early HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) caused by HER2 gene amplification is a driver in breast cancer tumorigenesis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of manual scoring and digital image analysis (DIA) algorithm assessment of HER2 copy numbers and HER2/CEP17 ratios, along with ERBB2 mRNA levels among early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 371 early HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab, with HER2 re-testing performed on whole tumor sections. Digitized tumor tissue slides were manually scored and assessed with uPath HER2 Dual ISH image analysis, breast algorithm. Targeted ERBB2 mRNA levels were assessed by the Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay. HER2 copy number and HER2/CEP17 ratio from in situ hybridization assessment, along with ERBB2 mRNA levels, were explored in relation to recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The analysis showed that patients with tumors with the highest and lowest manually counted HER2 copy number levels had worse RFS than those with intermediate levels (HR = 2.7, CI 1.4-5.3, p = 0.003 and HR = 2.1, CI 1.1-3.9, p = 0.03, respectively). A similar trend was observed for HER2/CEP17 ratio, and the DIA algorithm confirmed the results. Moreover, patients with tumors with the highest and the lowest values of ERBB2 mRNA had a significantly worse prognosis (HR = 2.7, CI 1.4-5.1, p = 0.003 and HR = 2.8, CI 1.4-5.5, p = 0.004, respectively) compared to those with intermediate levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the association between any of the three HER2 biomarkers and RFS was nonlinear. Patients with tumors with the highest levels of HER2 gene amplification or ERBB2 mRNA were associated with a worse prognosis than those with intermediate levels, which is of importance to investigate in future clinical trials studying HER2-targeted therapy.

HER2 mRNA Levels, Estrogen Receptor Activity and Susceptibility to Trastuzumab in Primary Breast Cancer

While the results thus far demonstrate the clinical benefit of trastuzumab in breast cancer (BC), some patients do not respond to this drug. HER2 mRNA, alone or combined with other genes/biomarkers, has been proven to be a powerful predictive marker in several studies. Here, we provide evidence of the association between HER2 mRNA levels and the response to anti-HER2 treatment in HER2-positive BC patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab and show that this association is independent of estrogen receptor (ER) tumor positivity. While HER2 mRNA expression was significantly correlated with HER2 protein levels in ER-negative tumors, no correlation was found in ER-positive tumors, and HER2 protein expression was not associated with relapse risk. Correlation analyses in the ER-positive subset identified ER activity as the pathway inversely associated with HER2 mRNA. Associations between HER2 levels and oncogene addiction, as well as between HER2 activation and trastuzumab sensitivity, were also observed in vitro in HER2-positive BC cell lines. In ER-positive but not ER-negative BC cells, HER2 transcription was increased by reducing ligand-dependent ER activity or inducing ER degradation. Accordingly, HER2 mRNA levels in patients were found to be inversely correlated with blood levels of estradiol, the natural ligand of ER that induces ER activation. Moreover, low estradiol levels were associated with a lower risk of relapse in HER2-positive BC patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. Overall, we found that HER2 mRNA levels, but not protein levels, indicate the HER2 dependency of tumor cells and low estrogen-dependent ER activity in HER2-positive tumors.

Higher serum PD-L1 level predicts increased overall survival with lapatinib versus trastuzumab in the CCTG MA.31 phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective biomarker study of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) MA.31 randomized phase 3 trial (lapatinib vs trastuzumab) of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive biomarker utility of pretreatment serum programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels.

METHODS

CCTG MA.31 accrued 652 HER2-positive patients; 387 had serum available (185 in the trastuzumab arm and 202 in the lapatinib arm). The Ella immunoassay platform (ProteinSimple, San Jose, California) was used to quantitate serum PD-L1 levels. Stepwise forward Cox multivariable analyses were performed for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In the whole trial population, continuous pretreatment serum PD-L1 levels were not associated with OS. However, within the trastuzumab arm, a higher continuous pretreatment serum PD-L1 level was significant for shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.85; P = .04), but within the lapatinib arm, pretreatment serum PD-L1 was not associated with OS (P = .37). In the whole trial, in a multivariable analysis for OS, serum PD-L1 (median cut point) remained a significant independent covariate (HR, 2.38; P = .001). There was a significant interaction between treatment arm and continuous serum PD-L1 (bootstrap method; P = .0025): at or above 214.2 pg/mL (the 89th percentile), serum PD-L1 was associated with significantly shorter OS with trastuzumab treatment versus lapatinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CCTG MA.31 trial, serum PD-L1 was a significant predictive factor: a higher pretreatment serum PD-L1 level was associated with shorter OS with trastuzumab treatment but with longer OS with lapatinib treatment. Immune evasion may decrease the effectiveness of trastuzumab therapy. Further evaluation of elevated serum PD-L1 in advanced breast cancer is warranted to identify patients with HER2-positive MBC who may benefit from novel immune-targeted therapies in addition to trastuzumab.

HER2 amplification level is not a prognostic factor for HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-based adjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Trastuzumab-based therapy is a standard, targeted treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. However, patients do not benefit equally from it and the association between HER2 amplification level and patients' survival remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by incorporating all available evidence to evaluate the association between disease free survival (DFS) and HER2 amplification level.

Results

Three cohort studies involving 1360 HER2-positive breast cancer patients stratified by HER2 amplification magnitude were eligible for meta-analysis. The combined HRs for DFS were 1.05 (95% CI: 0.80−1.36, p = 0.74) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.73−1.29, p = 0.83) for HER2 gene copy number (GCN) and HER2/CEP 17 ratio. No evidence of heterogeneity or public bias was found.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), were searched for eligible literature. HER2 amplification level was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in terms of gene copy number (GCN) and HER2/CEP17 ratio. Hazard ratios (HRs) for DFS with 95% confidence interval (CI) according to the amplification level of HER2 were extracted. The outcomes were synthesized based on a fixed-effects model.

Conclusions

HER2 amplification level is not a prognostic factor for HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-based targeted therapy in the clinical adjuvant setting.

HER2-positive breast cancer is lost in translation: time for patient-centered research

No biomarker beyond HER2 itself, which suffers from a low positive predictive value, has demonstrated clinical utility in breast cancer, despite numerous attempts to improve treatment tailoring for the growing number of anti-HER2 targeted therapies. This prompted us to examine the body of evidence, using a systematic approach, to identify putative predictive biomarkers in HER2-positive breast cancer, and discuss the hitherto failure to address the needs of patients. In the future, it is hoped immune-based biomarkers will predict benefit from anti-HER2 treatments in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In advanced-stage disease, the quantification of tumour heterogeneity using molecular-imaging technology has generated informative data on the success or failure of the antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1. Treatment tailoring remains a high priority, in cost-constrained health-care systems, but such tailoring will require a dramatic shift in the way translational research is being conducted, with the establishment of large, easily accessible, and well-annotated databases of candidate predictive biomarkers. Single-centre biomarker research should become a thing of the past.

A novel quantitative immunohistochemistry method for precise protein measurements directly in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens: analytical performance measuring HER2

In clinical routine pathology today, detection of protein in intact formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is limited to immunohistochemistry, which is semi-quantitative. This study presents a new and reliable quantitative immunohistochemistry method, qIHC, based on a novel amplification system that enables quantification of protein directly in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue by counting of dots. The qIHC technology can be combined with standard immunohistochemistry, and assessed using standard bright-field microscopy or image analysis. The objective was to study analytical performance of the qIHC method. qIHC was tested under requirements for an analytical quantitative test, and compared with ELISA and flow cytometry for quantitative protein measurements. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein expression was measured in five different cell lines with HER2 expression from undetectable with immunohistochemistry to strong positive staining (IHC 3+). Repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, linearity, dynamic range, sensitivity, and quantification limits were evaluated. Reproducibility and robustness were assessed in a setup to resemble daily work in a laboratory using a commercial immunohistochemistry platform. In addition, qIHC was correlated to standard HER2 immunohistochemistry in 44 breast cancer specimens. For all evaluated parameters, qIHC performance was either comparable or better than the reference methods. Furthermore, qIHC has a lower limit of detection than both immunohistochemistry and the ELISA reference method, and demonstrated ability to measure HER2 accurately and precise within a large dynamic range. In conclusion, the results show that qIHC provides a sensitive, quantitative, accurate, and robust assay for measurement of protein expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell lines, and tissue.

HER2 testing and its predictive utility in anti-HER2 breast cancer therapy

Breast cancer treatment is dependent on accurate pathologic diagnosis. HER2 testing is now universally recommended as part of evaluation of invasive breast cancer. HER2 testing is available via various slide and non-slide based assays, and interpretation of results continues to evolve. Herein we review these testing modalities and their incorporation into the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Once accurate HER2 status has been established the proper treatment based on recent clinical trials can be instituted.

Trastuzumab cardiac toxicity: a problem we put our heart into

Trastuzumab has gained a central role in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, revolutionizing care in this setting. However, since the beginning of its use there have been concerns about its cardiac safety. Trastuzumab can give rise to cardiac toxicity, in some cases leading to discontinuation of treatment. Growing evidence shows that trastuzumab toxicity can be detected early or averted by means of new chemotherapy regimens using different anthracycline formulations or avoiding anthracyclines altogether. Moreover, patients in whom cardiac toxicity develops can be treated effectively and full cardiac function can be restored thanks to progress in drug management. Knowing the characteristics and proper management of trastuzumab toxicity is of paramount importance to grant patients in this setting the best available treatment.

Quantification of HER family receptors in breast cancer

The clinical success of trastuzumab in breast cancer taught us that appropriate tumor evaluation is mandatory for the correct identification of patients eligible for targeted therapies. Although HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays are routinely used to select patients to receive trastuzumab, both assays only partially predict response to the drug. In the case of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the link between the presence of the receptor or its amplification and response to anti-EGFR therapies could not be demonstrated. Even less is known for HER3 and HER4, mainly due to lack of robust and validated assays detecting these proteins. It is becoming evident that, besides FISH and IHC, we need better assays to quantify HER receptors and categorize the patients for individualized treatments. Here, we present the current available methodologies to measure HER family receptors and discuss the clinical implications of target quantification.

Systemic targeted therapy for her2-positive early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline

BACKGROUND

This systematic review addresses the question "What is the optimal targeted therapy for female patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2)-positive breast cancer?"

METHODS

The medline and embase databases were searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major guideline organizations were also searched.

RESULTS

Sixty publications relevant to the targeted therapy portion of the systematic review were identified. In four major trials (hera, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-31, North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831, and Breast Cancer International Research Group 006), adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year was superior in disease-free survival (dfs) and overall survival (os) to no trastuzumab; trastuzumab showed no benefit in one trial (pacs 04). A shorter duration of trastuzumab (less than 1 year compared with 1 year) was evaluated, with mixed results for dfs: one trial showed superiority (finher), one trial could not demonstrate noninferiority (phare), another trial showed equivalent results (E 2198), and one trial is still ongoing (persephone). Longer trastuzumab duration (hera: 2 years vs. 1 year) showed no improvement in dfs or os and a higher rate of cardiac events. Newer her2-targeted agents (lapatinib, pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib) have been or are still being evaluated in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials, either by direct comparison with trastuzumab alone or combined with trastuzumab. In the neoadjuvant setting (neoaltto, GeparQuinto, Neosphere), trastuzumab alone or in combination with another anti-her2 agent (lapatinib, pertuzumab) was compared with either lapatinib or pertuzumab alone and showed superior or equivalent rates of pathologic complete response. In the adjuvant setting, lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab, compared with trastuzumab alone (altto) or with placebo (teach), was not superior in dfs. The results of the completed aphinity trial, evaluating the role of dual her2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, are highly anticipated. Ongoing trials are evaluating trastuzumab as a single agent without adjuvant chemotherapy (respect) and in patients with low her2 expression (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-47).

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into consideration disease characteristics and patient preference, 1 year of trastuzumab should be offered to all patients with her2-positive breast cancer who are receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Cardiac function should be regularly assessed in this patient population.

Optimal systemic therapy for early breast cancer in women: a clinical practice guideline

The Breast Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario identified the need for new guidelines for the adjuvant systemic therapy of early-stage breast cancer. The specific question to be addressed was "What is the optimal adjuvant systemic therapy for female patients with early-stage operable breast cancer, when patient and disease factors are considered?" A systematic review was prepared based on literature searches conducted using the medline and embase databases for the period January 2008 to March 5, 2012, and updated to May 12, 2014. Guidelines were located from that search, from the Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines, and from the Web sites of major guideline organizations. The literature located was subdivided into the broad categories of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and therapy targeted to her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Although several of the systemic therapies discussed in this guideline can be considered in the neoadjuvant setting, the review focused on trials with rates of disease-free and overall survival as endpoints and thus excluded several trials that used pathologic complete response as a primary endpoint. Based on the systematic review, the working group drafted recommendations on the use of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy; based on their professional experience, they also drafted recommendations on patient and disease characteristics and recurrence risk. The literature review and draft recommendations were circulated to a consensus panel of medical oncologists who had expertise in breast cancer and who represented the regions of Ontario. Items without initial consensus were discussed at an in-person consensus meeting held in Toronto, November 23, 2012. The final recommendations are those for which consensus was reached before or at the meeting. Some of the key evidence was revised after the updated literature search. Evidence reviews for systemic chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy for her2-positive disease are reported in separate articles in this supplement. The full three-part 1-21 evidence-based series, including complete details of the development and consensus processes, can be found on the Cancer Care Ontario Web site at https://www.cancercare.on.ca/toolbox/qualityguidelines/diseasesite/breast-ebs.

Elevated levels of StAR-related lipid transfer protein 3 alter cholesterol balance and adhesiveness of breast cancer cells: potential mechanisms contributing to progression of HER2-positive breast cancers

The STARD3 gene belongs to the minimal amplicon in HER2-positive breast cancers and encodes a cholesterol-binding membrane protein. To study how elevated StAR-related lipid transfer protein 3 (StARD3) expression affects breast cancer cells, we generated MCF-7 cells stably overexpressing StARD3-green fluorescent protein. We found that StARD3-overexpressing cells exhibited nonadherent morphological features, had increased Src levels, and had altered cholesterol balance, as evidenced by elevated mRNA levels of the cholesterol biosynthesis rate-limiting enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, and increased plasma membrane cholesterol content. On removal of serum and insulin from the culture medium, the morphological characteristics of the StARD3-overexpressing cells changed, the cells became adherent, and they developed enlarged focal adhesions. Under these conditions, the StARD3-overexpressing cells maintained elevated Src and plasma membrane cholesterol content and showed increased phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase. In two Finnish nationwide patient cohorts, approximately 10% (212/2220) breast cancers exhibited high StARD3 protein levels, which was strongly associated with HER2 amplification; several factors related to poor disease outcome and poor breast cancer-specific survival. In addition, high StARD3 levels in breast cancers were associated with elevated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase mRNA levels and anti-Src-Tyr416 immunoreactivity. These results provide evidence that StARD3 overexpression results in increased cholesterol biosynthesis and Src kinase activity in breast cancer cells and suggest that elevated StARD3 expression may contribute to breast cancer aggressiveness by increasing membrane cholesterol and enhancing oncogenic signaling.

HER3, p95HER2, and HER2 protein expression levels define multiple subtypes of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Trastuzumab is effective in the treatment of HER2/neu over-expressing breast cancer, but not all patients benefit from it. In vitro data suggest a role for HER3 in the initiation of signaling activity involving the AKT–mTOR pathway leading to trastuzumab insensitivity. We sought to investigate the potential of HER3 alone and in the context of p95HER2 (p95), a trastuzumab resistance marker, as biomarkers of trastuzumab escape. Using the VeraTag® assay platform, we developed a dual antibody proximity-based assay for the precise quantitation of HER3 total protein (H3T) from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tumors. We then measured H3T in 89 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based therapy, and correlated the results with progression-free survival and overall survival using Kaplan–Meier and decision tree analyses that also included HER2 total (H2T) and p95 expression levels. Within the sub-population of patients that over-expressed HER2, high levels of HER3 and/or p95 protein expression were significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes on trastuzumab-based therapy. Based on quantitative H3T, p95, and H2T measurements, multiple subtypes of HER2-positive breast cancer were identified that differ in their outcome following trastuzumab therapy. These data suggest that HER3 and p95 are informative biomarkers of clinical outcomes on trastuzumab therapy, and that multiple subtypes of HER2-positive breast cancer may be defined by quantitative measurements of H3T, p95, and H2T.

Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update

PURPOSE

To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing.

RESULTS

The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.

Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update

PURPOSE

To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing.

RESULTS

The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to > 10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing. This guideline was developed through a collaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists and has been published jointly by invitation and consent in both Journal of Clinical Oncology and the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

Divisional role of quantitative HER2 testing in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is amplified in human breast cancers in which therapy targeted to HER2 significantly improves patient outcome. We re-visited the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assays using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues as alternative methods and investigated their particular clinical relevance.

METHODS

DNA and RNA were isolated from FFPE specimens and HER2 status was assessed by qPCR in 249 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Concordance with results forg immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), clinical characteristics and survival was assessed.

RESULTS

HER2 gene copy number had a stronger correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and excellent concordance with IHC/ISH results (Sensitivity: 96.7 %; concordance: 99.2 %). HER2 gene expression showed inadequate sensitivity, rendering it unsuitable to determine HER2 status (Sensitivity: 46.7 %; concordance: 92.1 %), but lower HER2 gene expression, leading to the classification of many cases as "false negative", contributed to a prediction of better prognosis within the HER2-amplified subpopulation.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative HER2 assessments are suggested to have evolved their accuracy in this decade, which can be a potential alternative for HER2 diagnosis in line with the in situ method, while HER2 gene expression levels could provide additional information regarding prognosis or therapeutic strategy within a HER2-amplified subpopulation.

Advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer: current and future targeted therapies

The prognostic value of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in gastric cancer is controversial. Consensus guidelines have standardized the testing of HER2 status in gastric cancer. Overexpression of this receptor occurs in approximately 20% of gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinomas, predominantly those of the intestinal type. Recently, trastuzumab has emerged as the first targeted drug to improve overall survival when combined with chemotherapy in advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Primary and secondary resistance to trastuzumab has become a major problem and new strategies to overcome this resistance are needed. A high percentage of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer patients who progress on trastuzumab therapy are candidates for second-line therapy. New families of targeted drugs, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as lapatinib and PF-00299804, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway inhibitors such as everolimus, heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors such as AUY922, HER dimerization inhibitors such as pertuzumab, and antibody-chemotherapy conjugates such as trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), could offer alternative second-line treatments when trastuzumab-based first-line therapy fails.

Heart to heart with trastuzumab: a review on cardiac toxicity

Trastuzumab is regarded as the foundation of care for HER2-positive breast cancer as it has revolutionized the treatment of this disease across all settings. Although generally well tolerated, patients may develop symptomatic or asymptomatic cardiotoxicity, forcing a discontinuation of treatment, therefore preventing patients from benefiting from maximal disease control. Evolving research supports that trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity may be prevented or at least minimized by a number of prophylactic measures, such as identification of patients at risk and close monitoring. Optimized chemotherapy regimens, scheduling and formulations also contribute to minimizing cardiac adverse events. Equally important, if cardiotoxicity develops, medical interventions are now available that facilitate the reintroduction of trastuzumab once normal cardiac function has been restored. Awareness of this still-evolving information may lead to optimal use of trastuzumab, especially in combination regimens, maximizing antitumor benefit, while minimizing risk.

Quantum dots-based molecular classification of breast cancer by quantitative spectroanalysis of hormone receptors and HER2

The emerging molecular breast cancer (BC) classification based on key molecules, including hormone receptors (HRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been playing an important part of clinical practice guideline. The current molecular classification mainly based on their fingerprints, however, could not provide enough essential information for treatment decision making. The molecular information on both patterns and quantities could be more helpful to heterogeneities understanding for BC personalized medicine. Here we conduct quantitative determination of HRs and HER2 by quantum dots (QDs)-based quantitative spectral analysis, which had excellent consistence with traditional method. Moreover, we establish a new molecular classification system of BC by integrating the quantitative information of HER2 and HRs, which could better reveal BC heterogeneity and identify 5 molecular subtypes with different 5-year prognosis. Furthermore, the emerging 5 molecular subtypes based on simple quantitative molecules information could be as informative as multi-genes analysis in routine practice, and might help formulate a more personalized comprehensive therapy strategy and prognosis prediction.

Identification of a subpopulation of metastatic breast cancer patients with very high HER2 expression levels and possible resistance to trastuzumab

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) overexpressing HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) are currently selected for treatment with trastuzumab, but not all patients respond.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a novel assay, HER2 protein expression (H2T) was measured in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary breast tumors from 98 women treated with trastuzumab-based therapy for MBC. Using subpopulation treatment effect pattern plots, the population was divided into H2T low (H2T < 13.8), H2T high (H2T ≥ 68.5), and H2T intermediate (13.8 ≤ H2T < 68.5) subgroups. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were carried out comparing the groups for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Cox multivariate analyses were carried out to identify correlates of clinical outcome. Bootstrapping analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

TTP improved with increasing H2T until, at the highest levels of H2T, an abrupt decrease in the TTP was observed. KM analyses demonstrated that patients with H2T low tumors [median TTP 4.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.7, P < 0.0001] or H2T high tumors (median TTP 4.6 months, HR = 2.7, P = 0.008) had significantly shorter TTP than patients whose tumors were H2T intermediate (median TTP 12 months). OS analyses yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

MBC patients with very high levels of H2T may represent a subgroup with de novo resistance to trastuzumab. These results are preliminary and require confirmation in larger controlled clinical cohorts.