Plant-derived extracellular vesicles as nanocarriers for combination therapy enhancing paclitaxel-based regimens in breast cancer

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents unique challenges owing to its aggressiveness and limited treatment options. Paclitaxel-based chemotherapy is widely used in breast cancer treatment. However, its efficacy is often limited by toxicity, multidrug resistance, and lack of targeted delivery. In response to these challenges, recent studies have focused on the use of extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly plant-derived EVs, as innovative drug delivery systems capable of enhancing therapeutic outcomes and reducing adverse effects. Plant-derived EVs offer significant advantages owing to their biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and scalability. They provide a natural platform for delivering chemotherapeutics such as paclitaxel and doxorubicin directly to tumor cells. This review explores the therapeutic potential of plant-derived EVs in breast cancer treatment, focusing on TNBC by examining their ability to improve drug stability, bioavailability, and selective targeting of cancer cells. Key studies on EVs derived from plants such as grapefruit, ginger, and tea leaves have demonstrated their capacity to deliver chemotherapeutic agents effectively while mitigating common side effects associated with conventional delivery methods. Although the use of plantderived EVs is still in early stages of research, findings suggest that that these nanocarriers can serve as transformative tools in oncology, providing a versatile and efficient platform for precise cancer treatment. This review highlights current landscape of research on plant-derived EVs, their application in breast cancer therapy, and future directions required to translate these findings into clinical practice. [BMB Reports 2025; 58(2): 53-63].

Astragalus polysaccharides improve adjuvant chemotherapy-induced fatigue for patients with early breast cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Astragalus polysaccharides (PG2) on reducing chemotherapy-induced fatigue (CIF) and toxicity, thereby encouraging compliance to chemotherapy. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Patients with stage II/III early breast cancer planning to undergo adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive PG2 500 mg or placebo on days 1, 3, and 8 every 21 days. The fatigue global score (FGS) was assessed using the brief fatigue inventory (BFI)-Taiwan. The Breast Cancer-Specific Module of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires-Core30 evaluated the health-related quality of life during the first four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 66 eligible patients were equally randomized into the PG2 and placebo groups between March 01, 2018, and March 09, 2021. The mean change in the FGS and fatigue intensity did not significantly differ between both groups. However, the FGS and fatigue intensity were less aggravated in the first four cycles in the premenopausal-PG2 group than in the placebo group. Our study concluded PG2 combined with adjuvant chemotherapy can reduce CIF, insomnia, the negative effect on future perspectives, and improve global health status, especially for premenopausal patients with breast cancer. Trial registration number: NCT03314805 registered on 19/10/2017.

Shifting the Paradigm: The Transformative Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has become increasingly important in the treatment of breast cancer because of its various advantages. These include the ability to downstage tumors without compromising locoregional control and the potential to obtain valuable information about clinical and biological response to therapy with implications for individual prognoses. Surgical response assessment paves the way for response-adapted therapy, and pathological complete response (pCR; defined as ypT0/is ypN0) serves as an additional endpoint for drug development trials. Recommended NST regimens commonly consist of anthracyclines and taxane, with dose-dense anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel often preferred, whenever feasible. For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive tumors, dual anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) is indicated together with NST in case of elevated risk of recurrence. For patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adding carboplatin to NST correlates with improved pCR and survival rates, as does the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors. For hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative cancers, emerging data on NST including immune checkpoint inhibitors may elevate the significance of NST in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Here, we present a synthesis of the results from neoadjuvant clinical trials that aim at optimizing treatment options for patients with high-risk breast cancer.

Long-term outcomes of a randomized, open-label, phase II study comparing cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE)

BACKGROUND

The GENEVIEVE study, comparing neoadjuvant cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and luminal B/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC), previously reported significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Effects on long-term outcome are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GENEVIEVE randomized patients with cT2-3, any cN or cT1, cN+/pNSLN+, centrally confirmed TNBC or luminal B/HER2-negative BC (latter defined as estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive and >14% Ki-67-stained cells) to receive either cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 q3w for four cycles or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was allowed in case of histologically proven invasive residuals as neoadjuvant treatment or after surgery as adjuvant treatment. Here we report the secondary endpoints invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 333 patients randomized, 74.7% and 83.2% completed treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. After a median follow-up of 89.3 months (interquartile range 68.8-97.3 months), 80 iDFS events (43 after cabazitaxel and 37 after paclitaxel) and 47 deaths (23 after cabazitaxel and 24 after paclitaxel) were reported. IDFS rates were not significantly different between the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms after a 3-year (83.6% versus 85.0%) and 5-year follow-up (76.2% versus 78.3%) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.96, P = 0.294], respectively. DDFS rates at 3 years (88.6% versus 87.8%) and 5 years (82.1% versus 82.8%) for cabazitaxel and paclitaxel were comparable (HR = 1.15, P = 0.573). Similarly, OS rates at 3 years (91.6% versus 91.8%) and 5 years (89.2% versus 86.8%) showed no significant differences (HR = 1.05, P = 0.872). Subgroup analysis for TNBC and luminal B/HER2-negative BCs indicated no significant variations in 3- or 5-year iDFS, DDFS, or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant differences in pCR rates observed in both treatment arms did not significantly impact long-term outcomes for patients treated with cabazitaxel versus paclitaxel in the GENEVIEVE trial.

Novel Strategies Using Sagacious Targeting for Site-Specific Drug Delivery in Breast Cancer Treatment: Clinical Potential and Applications

For more than a decade, researchers have been working to achieve new strategies and smart targeting drug delivery techniques and technologies to treat breast cancer (BC). Nanotechnology presents a hopeful strategy for targeted drug delivery into the building of new therapeutics using the properties of nanomaterials. Nanoparticles are of high regard in the field of diagnosis and the treatment of cancer. The use of these nanoparticles as an encouraging approach in the treatment of various cancers has drawn the interest of researchers in recent years. In order to achieve the maximum therapeutic effectiveness in the treatment of BC, combination therapy has also been adopted, leading to minimal side effects and thus an enhancement in the quality of life for patients. This review article compares, discusses and criticizes the approaches to treat BC using novel design strategies and smart targeting of site-specific drug delivery systems.

Design and synthesis of salidroside analogs and their bioactivity against septic myocardial injury

Cardiac tissue suffers much from sepsis, and the incidence of myocardial injury is high in septic patients. The treatment of sepsis myocardial injury (SMI) has been the focus of clinical medicine. Salidroside shows myocardial cell protection, anti-oxidation and anti- inflammation effects, and it is thought as one of the potential compounds to treat sepsis myocardial injury. However, its anti-inflammatory activity is lower and its pharmacokinetic properties are not ideal, which is far from clinical application. Here, a series of salidroside analogs were synthesized, and their bioactivities were evaluated from several aspects, including their anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in vitro and anti-sepsis myocardial injury activities in vivo. Of all the compounds which synthesized, compounds 2 and 3 exhibited stronger anti-inflammatory activities than the others; after treating LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 or H9c2 cells with each of them, the levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were down-regulated in a dose-dependent manner. In the anti-oxidative stress injury test, compounds 2 and 3 not only markedly increased the survival rate of cells, and but also improved the cellular oxidative stress-related indicators MDA, SOD and cell damage marker LDH in a dose-dependent manner. In the LPS-induced septic rat myocardial injury models (in vivo), the two compounds also showed good bioactivities. They also reduced the expression of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, and blocked cell damage by suppressing overhauled oxidation in septic rats. In addition, the myocardial injury was significantly improved and the inflammatory infiltration was reduced after treatment with the two compounds. In conclusion, the salidroside analogs (2 and 3) showed promising therapeutical effect on septic myocardial injury in LPS-model rats, and they could be good candidates for clinical trials against inflammation and septic myocardial injury.

Doxorubicin-induced acute cardiotoxicity is associated with increased oxidative stress, autophagy, and inflammation in a murine model

Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a life-threatening side effect of doxorubicin (DOX) treatment that impacts patient prognosis and survival. In the majority of cases, the acute clinical form often remains asymptomatic, with few patients presenting rather nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormalities. While chronic toxicity has been more widely studied, the alterations appearing in acute cardiotoxicity are much less investigated. Thus, our in vivo study aimed to evaluate the process of DOX-induced acute myocardial toxicity by investigating oxidative stress and autophagy markers as mechanisms of myocardial toxicity in correlation with echocardiography and electrocardiography findings. Our results show that both autophagy and oxidative homeostasis were disrupted as soon as 7 days after DOX treatment, alterations that occurred even before the significant increase of NT-proBNP, a clinical marker for cardiac suffering. Moreover, we found a large number of alterations in the electrocardiography and echocardiography of treated rats. These findings suggest that DOX-induced myocardial toxicity started early after treatment initiation, possibly marking the initial phase of the unfolding process of cardiac damage. Further studies are required to completely decipher the mechanisms of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.

Microneedles-mediated drug delivery system for the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma

As an emerging novel drug delivery system, microneedles (MNs) have a wide range of applications in the medical field. They can overcome the physiological barriers of the skin, penetrate the outermost skin of the human body, and form hundreds of reversible microchannels to enhance the penetration of drugs and deliver drugs to the diseased sites. So they have great applications in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. Melanoma is a kind of malignant tumor, the survival rate of patients with metastases is extremely low. The traditional methods of surgery and drug treatment for melanoma are often accompanied by large adverse reactions in the whole body, and the drug concentration is low. The use of MNs for transdermal administration can increase the drug concentration, reduce adverse reactions in the treatment process, and have good therapeutic effect on melanoma. This paper introduced various types of MNs and their preparation methods, summarized the diagnosis and various treatment options for melanoma with MNs, focused on the treatment of melanoma with dissolved MNs, and made prospect of MNs-mediated transdermal drug delivery in the treatment of melanoma.

Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer. 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified based on the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The professional guideline primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN and ABC5, as well as that of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements. The recommendations cover classical prognostic factors and certain multigene tests, which play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. From a didactic point of view, the text first addresses early and then locally advanced breast cancer, followed by locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to the available therapeutic options. At the end of the recommendations, we summarize the criteria for treatment in certain rare clinical situations.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, Docetaxel, and Trastuzumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase II and Biomarker Study

Background

Combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is the standard regimen for human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). However, pertuzumab is not available because it is not on the market or covered by medicare in some regions or poor economy. Anthracyclines and taxanes are cornerstones in BC chemotherapy, and their combination contributes to satisfactory efficiency in neoadjuvant settings. Nonetheless, concomitant administration of trastuzumab and an anthracycline is generally avoided clinically due to cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is less cardiotoxic compared with traditional anthracyclines. Here, we conducted this prospective study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and potential biomarkers for PLD plus trastuzumab and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in HER2-positive BC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with stage II or III HER2-positive BC were recruited in this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible patients were given 6 cycles of PLD plus docetaxel and trastuzumab. Primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints were breast pathological complete response (bpCR, ypT0/is), objective response rate (ORR), operation rate, breast-conserving surgery rate, and safety. Metadherin (MTDH), glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase (QPCT), topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated in BC tissues pre-neoadjuvant for potential biomarkers.

Results

Between March 2019 and February 2021, 54 patients were enrolled, 50 were included in the analysis, and 35 (70.0%) completed 6 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment. Forty-nine (98.0%) patients underwent surgery with a breast-conserving rate of 44.0%. The tpCR rate, bpCR rate, and ORR were 48.0% (95% CI, 33.7%–62.6%), 60.0% (95% CI, 45.2%–73.6%), and 84.0% (95% CI, 70.9%–92.8%), respectively. tpCR was associated with MTDH (p = 0.002) and QPCT (p = 0.036) expression but not with TOP2A (p = 0.75), PD-L1 (p = 0.155), or TILs (p = 0.76). Patients with HR-negative status were more likely to achieve bpCR compared with those with HR-positive status (76.2% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.047). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 38.0% of patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction decline by ≥10% was reported in 18.0% of patients, and no patient experienced congestive heart failure.

Conclusions

PLD plus docetaxel and trastuzumab might be a potential neoadjuvant regimen for HER2-positive BC with a high tpCR rate and manageable tolerability. MTDH and QPCT are potential predictive markers for tpCR.

Outcome of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy compared with non-pregnant controls

BACKGROUND

A diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) does not impact prognosis if standard treatment is offered. However, caution is warranted as gestational changes in pharmacokinetics may lead to reduced chemotherapy concentration.

METHODS

Survival of PrBC patients treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy was compared to non-pregnant breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, diagnosed after 2000, excluding patients older than 45 years or with a postpartum diagnosis. The data was registered in two multicenter registries (the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy and the German Breast Group). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between both groups, adjusting for age, stage, grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor 2 status and histology, weighted by propensity scoring to account for the differences in baseline characteristics between pregnant patients and controls.

RESULTS

In total, 662 pregnant and 2081 non-pregnant patients were selected. Pregnant patients were more likely to have stage II breast cancer (60.1% vs 56.1%, p = 0.035), grade 3 tumors (74.0% vs 62.2%, p < 0.001), hormone receptor-negative tumors (48.4% vs 34.0%, p < 0.001) or triple-negative breast cancer (38.9% vs 26.9%, p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 66 months. In multivariable analysis, DFS and OS were comparable for pregnant and non-pregnant patients (DFS: HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.27, p = 0.83; OS: HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.45, p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

Outcome of women with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy is comparable to young non-pregnant women. These results support chemotherapy for PrBC when indicated.

Effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus epirubicin as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an improved formulation of doxorubicin with comparable effectiveness but significantly lower cardiotoxicity than conventional anthracycline. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of PLD versus epirubicin as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

METHODS

Clinical data of invasive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with PLD or epirubicin were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the risk of selection bias. The molecular typing of these patients included Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, and basal-like/triple-negative. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR) rate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for adjuvant chemotherapy. Noninferiority was suggested if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the 3-year DFS rate difference was greater than - 10%. The secondary outcome was adverse reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 1213 patients were included (neoadjuvant, n = 274; adjuvant, n = 939). pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) rates of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 11.6% for the PLD group and 7.0% for the epirubicin group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.4578). The 3-year DFS rate of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was 94.9% [95%CI, 91.1-98.6%] for the PLD group and 95.4% [95%CI, 93.0-97.9%] for the epirubicin group (P = 0.5684). Rate difference between the two groups and its 95% CI was - 0.55 [- 5.02, 3.92]. The lower limit of the 95% CI was - 5.0% > - 10.0%, suggesting that PLD is not be inferior to epirubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The incidences of myelosuppression, decreased appetite, alopecia, gastrointestinal reactions, and cardiotoxicity were lower in the PLD group than in the epirubicin group, while the incidence of nausea was higher in the PLD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, effectiveness is similar but toxicities are different between the PLD-containing regimen and epirubicin-containing regimen. Therefore, further study is warranted to explore PLD-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Treatment and long-term outcome of breast cancer in very young women: nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the correlation between long-term survival and treatment in very young women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Data on women with breast cancer were retrieved from the Taiwan Cancer Registry between 2004 and 2014. Patients who did not undergo surgery or who had stage 0 or IV disease were excluded. Survival analysis was conducted. The participants were divided into very young (20-29.9 years), young (30-39.9 years), and adult (40-50.0 years) groups.

RESULTS

Among 104 115 women, 24 474 (572 very young, 5565 young, and 18 337 adult) were eligible for the study. Median follow-up was 79.5 (range 24-158) months. The mortality rates in the very young, young, and adult groups were 12.9, 10.0, and 8.2 per cent respectively (P < 0.001). Very young patients had higher histological grade, unfavourable subtype, higher TNM stage, and received more breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that very young patients had the poorest long-term survival. Very young patients with stage II disease had the worst prognosis. In the multivariable regression model, radiotherapy was associated with decreased local recurrence but not with improved overall, cancer-specific, or disease-free survival for stage II disease in the very young group. Surgery type and chemotherapy were not associated with significant improvement in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Very young patients with stage II disease had poor long-term outcomes. BCS had no detrimental effects on long-term outcomes.

Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response rate in HER2-negative breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Data exploring optimal sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer are limited and inconsistent. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world impact of sequence order on pathologic complete response (pCR) and clinical outcomes from NACT.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative breast cancer treated with NACT from May 2012 to April 2020 were identified from a prospectively collected institutional database. The primary endpoint was to compare rates of pCR (ypT0/isN0) between patients who received anthracyclines followed by taxanes (AC-T) to those who received taxanes followed by anthracyclines (T-AC). Additional endpoints of interest included clinical complete response, downstaging, Neo-Bioscore, conversion to breast-conserving surgery eligibility, relapse-free survival, and overall survival between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 283 patients who met eligibility criteria, 187 (66%) received AC-T and 96 (34%) received T-AC. Sequence order did not influence the primary endpoint of pCR rate (19% for AC-T vs. 21% for T-AC, p = 0.752). There were also no significant differences in secondary NACT efficacy outcomes between groups. In the overall cohort, pCR rate was higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (32% vs. 13% in hormone-positive cancer, p < 0.001) and grade 3 tumors (31% vs. 12% for grade 1-2 tumors, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis of HER2-negative breast cancer patients, there was no differential impact on pCR rate or clinical outcomes from NACT with sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes. This supports the current variation in prescribing practice.

Molecules and Mechanisms to Overcome Oxidative Stress Inducing Cardiovascular Disease in Cancer Patients

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are molecules involved in signal transduction pathways with both beneficial and detrimental effects on human cells. ROS are generated by many cellular processes including mitochondrial respiration, metabolism and enzymatic activities. In physiological conditions, ROS levels are well-balanced by antioxidative detoxification systems. In contrast, in pathological conditions such as cardiovascular, neurological and cancer diseases, ROS production exceeds the antioxidative detoxification capacity of cells, leading to cellular damages and death. In this review, we will first describe the biology and mechanisms of ROS mediated oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease. Second, we will review the role of oxidative stress mediated by oncological treatments in inducing cardiovascular disease. Lastly, we will discuss the strategies that potentially counteract the oxidative stress in order to fight the onset and progression of cardiovascular disease, including that induced by oncological treatments.

Impact of the Delayed Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Outcome of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the recurrence risk and improves survival rates; however, it is unclear whether a delayed initiation is associated with adverse outcomes, especially in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, we evaluated the influence of the time to start adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) in the outcomes of TNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 15 years of data from patients with TNBC who received adjuvant chemotherapy at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (Lima, Peru). TTC was categorized into 4 groups: ≤ 30, 31 to 60, 61 to 90, and ≥ 91 days. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In total, 687 patients were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 49.1 years (SD, 11.8 years), and most (62.6%) patients had pathologic stage T2. The median TTC was 48.1 days (SD, 27.4 days); 189 (27.5%) received chemotherapy ≤ 30 days; 329 (47.9%), between 31 and 60 days; 115 (16.7%), between 61 and 90 days; and 54 (7.9%) in ≥ 90 days. In the multivariate analysis, a TTC between 31 and 60 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.72), 61 and 90 days (HR, 2.38; 95%CI, 1.43-3.97), and ≥ 91 days (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.32-4.55) was associated with an increased mortality in contrast with a TTC < 30 days. Although a TTC between 31 and 60 days, 61 and 90 days, and ≥ 91 days was associated with an increased risk of DRFS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.24-2.79; HR, 2.34, 95% CI, 1.42-3.867; and HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.78-5.61, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A delaying in TTC ≥ 30 days was associated with poorer outcomes. Our data suggest that several efforts should be conducted to avoid a delayed TTC in patients with TNBC.

Impact of chemotherapy regimen and sequence on the effectiveness of scalp cooling for alopecia prevention

PURPOSE

Scalp cooling (SC) is the most reliable method for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. However, it remains unclear if its effectiveness is related to the chemotherapy regimen, sequence, and frequency. This study aims to evaluate SC performance among breast cancer patients who received different chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

The medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing curative-intent chemotherapy and receiving at least one SC session using the DigniCap® System from 2016-2020 in a private Mexican hospital were retrospectively reviewed. SC effectiveness according to chemotherapy regimen was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Successful alopecia prevention was defined as grade 0-1 alopecia (< 50% hair loss not requiring the use of a wig or headpiece) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

RESULTS

SC adequately prevented alopecia in 56/76 (74%) patients. All 12/12 (100%) and 15/17 (88%) patients receiving paclitaxel-only and docetaxel-based chemotherapy, respectively, had effective hair preservation. SC was successful in 7/16 (44%) patients when sequential chemotherapy started with anthracyclines and 22/30 (73%) when paclitaxel was administered upfront. Considering dose-dense regimens, 9/15 (60%) had satisfactory hair retention, and chemotherapy sequence was not clearly related to SC success.

CONCLUSION

SC was highly effective in preventing alopecia, particularly with taxane-based regimens. Notably, better outcomes were observed when sequential chemotherapy started with taxanes followed by anthracyclines than when the inverse order was administered, suggesting that the chemotherapy sequence, rather than chemotherapeutic agents per se, might have a more significant impact on the effectiveness of SC for the prevention of alopecia.

Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Preferred neoadjuvant regimens for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) include anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. IMpassion031 compared efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus placebo combined with nab-paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage TNBC.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study enrolled patients in 75 academic and community sites in 13 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage II-III histologically documented TNBC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy plus intravenous atezolizumab at 840 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. Chemotherapy comprised of nab-paclitaxel at 125 mg/m² every week for 12 weeks followed by doxorubicin at 60 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m² every 2 weeks for 8 weeks, which was then followed by surgery. Stratification was by clinical breast cancer stage and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Co-primary endpoints were pathological complete response in all-randomised (ie, all randomly assigned patients in the intention-to-treat population) and PD-L1-positive (ie, patients with PD-L1-expressing tumour infiltrating immune cells covering ≥1% of tumour area) populations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03197935), Eudra (CT2016-004734-22), and the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JapicCTI-173630), and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between July 7, 2017, and Sept 24, 2019, 455 patients were recruited and assessed for eligibility. Of the 333 eligible patients, 165 were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 168 to placebo plus chemotherapy. At data cutoff (April 3, 2020), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 8·7-24·9) in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 19·8 months (8·1-24·5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Pathological complete response was documented in 95 (58%, 95% CI 50-65) patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 69 (41%, 34-49) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 17%, 95% CI 6-27; one-sided p=0·0044 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the PD-L1-positive population, pathological complete response was documented in 53 (69%, 95% CI 57-79) of 77 patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 37 (49%, 38-61) of 75 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (rate difference 20%, 95% CI 4-35; one-sided p=0·021 [significance boundary 0·0184]). In the neoadjuvant phase, grade 3-4 adverse events were balanced and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 37 (23%) and 26 (16%) patients, with one patient per group experiencing an unrelated grade 5 adverse event (traffic accident in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and pneumonia in the placebo plus chemotherapy group).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with early-stage TNBC, neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response rates with an acceptable safety profile.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.

Efficacy and safety analysis of paclitaxel, docetaxel and liposomal paclitaxel after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Paclitaxel-based regimens are widely used in the neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) of breast cancer. The purpose is to analysis the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) among common paclitaxel (PTX), docetaxel and liposomal paclitaxel. At the same time, we want to analysis the axillary nodal pathologic complete response (apCR) after NAT among the three groups.

METHODS

From April 2014 to 2020, 647 breast cancer patients underwent operation after NAT were included in this study. Patients received full course of anthracycline- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy before surgery. The paclitaxel-based regimens included PTX, docetaxel and liposomal paclitaxel. The therapy efficacy and AEs of the three groups were evaluated. At the same time, the apCR was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In general, 30.6% (198/647) of patients achieved breast pathologic complete response (bpCR), which was 28.6%, 28.3% and 39.3% among PTX, docetaxel and liposomal paclitaxel group, respectively (p = 0.067). The total pathologic complete response (tpCR) (achieving both bpCR and apCR) was 21.6% (140/647). The tpCR was 13.3%, 19.4% and 34.4% among PTX, docetaxel and liposomal paclitaxel group, respectively (p = 0.026). The multivariate logistic analysis result showed that clinical tumor stage and molecular subtype were significantly associated with tpCR (all p < 0.05). Among 592 clinical positive patients (cN₊), the apCR was 39.0% (231/592). The multivariate logistic analysis showed that paclitaxel- based regimens and molecular subtype were indicated as independent predictors for apCR of NAT. The apCR was significantly higher in liposomal paclitaxel group (63.5%) than in PTX (24.6%) and docetaxel group (34.8%) (p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis among different molecular subtypes found that in triple negative (TN) and HER-2 positive (HER2+) subgroup, the apCR in liposomal paclitaxel group was significantly higher than those in PTX and docetaxel group (all p < 0.05). But no significant result was found in the subgroup analysis in hormone receptor positive/HER-2 negative subgroup (p = 0.050). Safety analysis indicated that the incidence of neutropenia (grade III-IV) and peripheral neurotoxicity (grade I-II) was significantly lower in the liposomal paclitaxel group than in the PTX and docetaxel group. The incidence of oral mucositis, anaphylaxis and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was also much lower in liposomal paclitaxel than other two groups (all p < 0.05). And there was no significant difference in other AEs among the three groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Liposome paclitaxel had similar tumor suppressor effect compared with PTX and docetaxel in NAT setting. Moreover, it had a better axillary lymph node (ALN) response after NAT than PTX and docetaxel. These patients who received liposome paclitaxel had more chance to avoid ALN dissection after NAT. At the same time, the application of liposome enables liposome paclitaxel could significantly reduce AEs caused by chemotherapy. Therefore, we suggested the application of liposome paclitaxel in the NAT setting, especially for cN₊ patients with TN and HER2 + disease.

Does the Sequence of Anthracycline and Taxane Matter? The NeoSAMBA Trial

BACKGROUND

Taxanes usually follow anthracyclines in breast cancer neo/adjuvant treatment, likely because of their later introduction into clinical practice. However, there is no biological rationale that justifies this current standard of care. We compared a taxane followed by an anthracycline-based regimen with the reverse sequence in the neoadjuvant setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomized, open-label, single-center phase II trial, women with inoperable, locally advanced, HER2-negative breast cancer were stratified by hormone receptor status and randomized to three cycles of docetaxel (T) followed by three cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus three cycles of FAC followed by three cycles of docetaxel. Surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy were administered as per local guidelines. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints included toxicity, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Treatment sequence did not improve pCR, which was 7% with T-FAC and 3% with FAC-T. However, after a median follow-up of 79 months, the 5-year EFS rate was 75.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4%-87.7%) with T-FAC and 48.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-62.7%) with FAC-T (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81; log-rank p = .0054), and the 5-year OS rate was 89.7% (95% CI, 82.2%-97.8%) with T-FAC and 64.7% (95% CI, 53.6%-78.1%) with FAC-T (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; p = .0052). There were no unexpected toxicities.

CONCLUSION

We showed for the first time an improvement in EFS and OS with taxane-first compared with anthracycline-first sequencing chemotherapy in HER2-negative, locally advanced breast cancer. Confirmation of these results may have implications for clinical practice. This trial was registered with Clinicatrials.gov identifier NCT01270373.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The NeoSAMBA trial showed a benefit for taxane-first sequencing chemotherapy consistent with the systematic review of the literature as well as the larger Neo-tAnGo study. Many recent and current ongoing clinical trials have already followed this treatment strategy. As a taxane-before-anthracycline sequence carries neither an incremental cost nor an increased toxicity, and given the available literature on this issue, reinforced that taxane-first regimen can be easily incorporated into daily clinical practice while awaiting confirmation of these findings from larger trials.

Dextran methacrylate hydrogel microneedles loaded with doxorubicin and trametinib for continuous transdermal administration of melanoma

Microneedles (MNs) technology has many advantages and is an ideal local transdermal drug delivery method. Here we synthesized photocrosslinkable dextran methacrylate (DexMA), and its degree of substitution is 5 % higher than the previous method. We used DexMA hydrogel for the first time to develop a new type of MNs for continuous transdermal administration. The prepared hydrogel MNs can successfully penetrate the epidermal layer and achieve sustained drug release. Doxorubicin (DOX) and trametinib (Tra) are anticancer drugs approved by FDA. Besides, Tra can also reverse P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) to effectively block the efflux of DOX by P-gp. We used MNs to simultaneously load Tra and DOX, and achieved synergy in a B16 cell xenograft nude mouse model. The DexMA hydrogel MNs developed in this study can be used to enhance the transdermal delivery of small molecule drugs and reduce systemic toxicity and side effects.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Trends of Adjuvant Anthracycline and Taxane Regimen for Early Stage Breast Cancer

Background

The anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy treatment regimen remains the gold standard for treatment of early stage breast cancer. However, studies examining the effectiveness and use of this treatment regimen in Indian context are limited. This study examined patients treated with anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy at a tertiary care cancer center in India.

Methods

Patients with confirmed early stage breast cancer who had undergone primary breast surgery followed by treatment with anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy between 2009 and 2015 were included in the study. Data on clinical characteristics and treatment details were collected from the patients’ medical records.

Results

Two hundred sixty-four women were included in the analysis. The median age at presentation was 50 years. Among the 264 women, 40.5% were premenopausal, 1.2% were perimenopausal, and 58.3% were postmenopausal. The number of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were 35.2% and 64.7%, respectively. Patients with a tumor grade of 1, 2, and 3 were 7.2%, 53.1%, and 39.7%, respectively. Tumors were unifocal in 81.1% and multifocal in 18.2% of patients. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) positivity was detected in 58.3%, 54.2%, and 3.1% of patients, respectively and 38.6% of patients were triple negative. With a median follow-up of 36.2 months, the invasive disease-free survival rate was 90.9% and mean disease-free survival time was 65.4 ± 1.13 months.

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm the clinical utility of anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy regimen as the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment of early stage breast cancer.

Synthesis of novel flexible tamoxifen analogues to overcome CYP2D6 polymorphism and their biological evaluation on MCF-7 cell line

Tamoxifen (TAM) is currently the endocrine treatment of choice for all stages of breast cancer; it has proven success in ER positive and ER negative patients. TAM is activated by endogenous CYP450 enzymes to the more biologically active metabolites 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen mainly via CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5. CYP2D6 has been investigated for polymorphism; there is a large interindividual variation in the enzyme activity, this drastically effects clinical outcomes of tamoxifen treatment. Here in we report the design and synthesis of 10 novel compounds bearing a modified tamoxifen skeleton, ring C is substituted with different ester groups to bypass the CYP2D6 enzyme metabolism and employ esterase enzymes for activation. All compounds endorse flexibility on ring A. Compounds (II-X) showed MCF-7% growth inhibition >50% at a screening dose of 10 μM. These results were validated by yeast estrogen screen (YES) and E-Screen assay combined with XTT assay. Compound II (E/Z 4-[1-4-(3-Dimethylamino-propoxy)-phenyl)-3-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-2-methyl-propenyl]-phenol) showed nanomolar antiestrogenic activity (IC₅₀ = 510 nM in YES assay) and was five times more potent in inhibiting the growth of MCF-7 BUS (IC₅₀ = 96 nM) compared to TAM (IC₅₀ = 503 nM). Esterified analogues VI, VII were three times more active than TAM on MCF-7 BUS (IC₅₀ = 167 nM). Novel analogues are prodrugs that can ensure equal clinical outcomes to all breast cancer patients.

Ratiometric co-delivery of doxorubicin and docetaxel by covalently conjugating with mPEG-poly(β-malic acid) for enhanced synergistic breast tumor therapy

Ratiometric codelivery of doxorubicin and docetaxel through an engineered nanoconjugate based on mPEG-PMLA facilitates the accumulation of drugs at the tumor site and enhances synergistic antitumor response.

Development of Long-Circulating and Fusogenic Liposomes Co-encapsulating Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin in Synergistic Ratio for the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Background:

The co-encapsulation of paclitaxel (PTX) and doxorubicin (DXR) in liposomes has the potential to offer pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages, providing delivery of both drugs to the tumor at the ratio required for synergism.

Objective:

To prepare and characterize long-circulating and fusogenic liposomes co-encapsulating PTX and DXR in the 1:10 molar ratio (LCFL-PTX/DXR).

Methods:

LCFL-PTX/DXR was prepared by the lipid film formation method. The release of PTX and DXR from liposomes was performed using a dialysis method. Studies of cytotoxicity, synergism, and cellular uptake were also carried out.

Results:

The encapsulation percentage of PTX and DXR was 74.1 ± 1.8 % and 89.6 ± 12.3%, respectively, and the mean diameter of the liposomes was 244.4 ± 28.1 nm. The vesicles remained stable for 30 days after their preparation. The drugs were simultaneously released from vesicles during 36 hours, maintaining the drugs combination in the previously established ratio. Cytotoxicity studies using 4T1 breast cancer cells showed lower inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50) value for LCFL-PTX/DXR treatment (0.27 ± 0.11 µm) compared to the values of free drugs treatment. In addition, the combination index (CI) assessed for treatment with LCFL-PTX/DXR was equal to 0.11 ± 0.04, showing strong synergism between the drugs. Cell uptake studies have confirmed that the molar ratio between PTX and DXR is maintained when the drugs are administered in liposomes.

Conclusion:

It was possible to obtain LCFL-PTX/DXR suitable for intravenous administration, capable of releasing the drugs in a fixed synergistic molar ratio in the tumor region.

Early prediction of neoadjuvant treatment outcome in locally advanced breast cancer using parametric response mapping and radial heterogeneity from breast MRI

BACKGROUND

Early prediction of nonresponse is essential in order to avoid inefficient treatments.

PURPOSE

To evaluate if parametrical response mapping (PRM)-derived biomarkers could predict early morphological response (EMR) and pathological complete response (pCR) 24-72 hours after initiation of chemotherapy treatment and whether concentric analysis of nonresponding PRM regions could better predict response.

STUDY TYPE

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired cohort, nonrandomized, monocentric, diagnostic study.

POPULATION

Sixty patients were initially recruited, with 39 women participating in the final cohort.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 1.5T scanner was used for MRI examinations.

ASSESSMENT

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MR images were acquired at baseline (timepoint 1, TP1), 24-72 hours after the first chemotherapy (TP2), and after the end of anthracycline treatment (TP3). PRM was performed after fusion of T₁ subtraction images from TP1 and TP2 using an affine registration algorithm. Pixels with an increase of more than 10% of their value (PRMdce+) were corresponding nonresponding regions of the tumor. Patients with a decrease of maximum diameter (%dDmax) between TP1 and TP3 of more than 30% were defined as EMR responders. pCR patients achieved a residual cancer burden score of 0.

STATISTICAL TESTS

T-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and logistic regression were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

PRM showed a statistical difference between pCR response groups (P < 0.01) and AUC of 0.88 for the prediction of non-pCR. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that PRMdce+ and Grade II were significant (P < 0.01) for non-pCR prediction (AUC = 0.94). Peripheral tumor region demonstrated higher performance for the prediction of non-pCR (AUC = 0.85) than intermediate and central zones; however, statistical comparison showed no significant difference.

DATA CONCLUSION

PRM could be predictive of non-pCR 24-72 hours after initiation of chemotherapy treatment. Moreover, the peripheral region showed increased AUC for non-pCR prediction and increased signal intensity during treatment for non-pCR tumors, information that could be used for optimal tissue sampling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1403-1411.

Prognosis and endocrine therapy selection for patients with low hormone receptor-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective study of 570 patients in China

The 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines have reduced the immunohistochemistry cut-off value for determining estrogen receptor b positivity from 10 to 1% of stained cells in breast cancer. In clinical practice, low-hormone receptor positive (low HR+) tumors are classified in the luminal subtype, although they exhibit aggressive features and poor prognosis. Information regarding the prognosis of patients with breast cancer following treatment with optimal endocrine therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is currently lacking. In the present study, the differences in clinical characteristics and survival of patients with breast cancer were compared among those with low and high HR+ breast cancer who received NAC. Furthermore, the effects of different types of endocrine therapies on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer were compared. The study population comprised patients with primary breast cancer who were treated at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January, 2007 and December, 2017. Patients were divided into three groups based on the results of immunohistochemistry: HR+ (positive staining >10%), HR- (positive staining <1%) and low HR+ (positive staining 1–10%). The low HR+ group was further divided into three subgroups according to the different endocrine therapies administered: Tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor or no treatment. Among the 570 patients included in the present study, 60 (10.53%) patients had low HR+ tumors. With a median follow-up of 48.98 months, patients with low HR+ tumors had reduced survival rates compared with those with HR+ tumors. Furthermore, the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) of patients with low HR+ was comprised between pCR from patients with HR+ and pCR from patients with HR- following NAC treatment. In addition, no significant difference in the overall prognosis was observed among patients with low HR+ following treatment with different endocrine therapies. Subsequently, patients in the low HR+ group were more likely to benefit from NAC compared with patients in the HR+ group. Intensive endocrine therapy may therefore improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer and low HR+; however, further investigation is required.

Regulation of PERK expression by FOXO3: a vulnerability of drug-resistant cancer cells

The major impediment to effective cancer therapy has been the development of drug resistance. The tumour suppressive transcription factor FOXO3 promotes cell cycle arrest, senescence and cell death, and mediates the cytotoxic and cytostatic functions of cancer therapeutics. In consequence, FOXO3 is often downregulated as an adaptive response in cancer and particularly in chemotherapeutic drug-resistant cells. Consistently, we find that FOXO3 expression is attenuated in the drug-resistant MCF-7-Epi^R and MCF-7-Tax^R compared to the parental MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Using ChIP, short-interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown, and overexpression assays as well as Foxo^1/3/4-/- MEFs, we establish the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress defence modulator PERK (eIF2AK3) as a direct downstream transcriptional target of FOXO3. In agreement, there is also a positive correlation between FOXO3 and PERK expression at the protein and RNA levels in breast cancer patient samples. We uncover that PERK expression is downregulated but its activity constitutively elevated in the drug-resistant cells. With this in mind, we exploit this adaptive response of low FOXO3 and PERK expression, and high PERK activity in drug-resistant breast cancer cells and show that these drug-resistant cells are specifically sensitive to PERK inhibition. In support of this finding, we show that ectopic overexpression of FOXO3 can reduce the sensitivity of the resistant cells to the PERK inhibitor GSK2606414, while the Foxo^1/3/4-/- MEFs expressing lower levels of PERK are more sensitive to PERK inhibition compared to wild-type MEFs. PERK inhibitor-titration and -time course experiments showed that the drug-resistant cells, which express lower expression and higher activity levels of PERK, are more sensitive to the increasing concentrations of PERK inhibitor compared to parental MCF-7 cells. Our present work thus reveals a chemotherapeutic drug-resistant cancer cell vulnerability in PERK and suggests PERK as a potential target for cancer therapy, specifically in the context of drug-resistant cancers.

Short and Long-Term Effects of the Exposure of Breast Cancer Cell Lines to Different Ratios of Free or Co-Encapsulated Liposomal Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin

Background: Associating paclitaxel (PTX) to doxorubicin (DXR) is one of the main chemotherapy strategies for breast cancer (BC) management. Protocols currently available consist in administering both drugs on their maximum tolerated dose, not taking into account the possible differences in efficacy due to their combination ratio. In the present study, the short and long-term cytotoxic effects as well as migratory effects of PTX, DXR, and its combinations at 10:1; 1:1 and 1:10 PTX:DXR molar ratios either free or co-encapsulated in liposomes were evaluated against three human BC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and SKBR-3). Method: The MTT assay was used to screen for synergy or antagonism between PTX and DXR and the combination index value was calculated using the CalcuSyn software. Nuclear morphological alterations were evaluated by staining the cells with Hoescht 33342. The investigation of senescence and clonogenicity of BC cell lines exposed to different treatments was also studied. In addition, the ability of these cells to migrate was assessed. Results: Taken together, the results presented herein allow us to suggest that there is no benefit in enhancing the PTX concentration above that of DXR in the combination for any of the three cell lines tested. Conclusion: The developed liposomes co-encapsulating PTX and DXR in different molar ratios retained the biological properties of the mixture of free drugs and are valuable for planning new therapeutic strategies.

Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines and taxanes are chemotherapeutic agents widely used in a sequential regimen in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Standard practice is to administer anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by a taxane. Anthracyclines tend to be administered first as they were established before taxanes for treatment of early breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the sequence in which anthracyclines and taxanes are administered affects outcomes for people with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Breast Cancer's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 1 February 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing administering a taxane prior to an anthracycline with taxane following anthracycline to people with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. The studies needed to have reported on at least one of our outcomes of interest, which included overall survival, disease-free survival, pathological response, treatment adherence, toxicity and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and quality of the evidence. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, pathological response (in the neoadjuvant setting only), adverse events, treatment adherence and quality of life. For time-to-event outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival, we derived hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) where possible. For dichotomous outcomes of pathological complete response, treatment adherence and adverse events, we reported the treatment effect as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI where possible. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence separately for the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 1415 participants in five neoadjuvant studies and 280 participants in four adjuvant studies involving five treatment comparisons. Four of the five neoadjuvant studies collected data for the primary outcome (overall survival) and two studies had data available; one of the four adjuvant studies collected overall survival data.The neoadjuvant studies suggested that the administration of taxanes first probably resulted in little to no difference in overall survival (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.08; 947 participants; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and disease-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.09; 828 participants; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence). Administration of taxanes first also resulted in little to no difference in pathological complete response (absence of cancer in the breast and axilla: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.38; 1280 participants; 4 studies; high-certainty evidence). However, there appeared to be a trend in favour of taxanes first. Studies reported treatment adherence using a range of measures. Administration of taxanes first probably did not increase the likelihood of requiring dose reductions compared to administration of anthracyclines first (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.11; 280 participants; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence). There was probably little to no difference in the risk of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.82; 280 participants, 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence) or grade 3/4 neurotoxicity (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.65; 1108 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) when taxanes were given first. There were no data on quality of life.Only one adjuvant study collected data on overall survival and disease-free survival but did not report data. Administration of taxanes first reduced the risk of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.97; 279 participants; 4 studies, 5 treatment comparisons; high-certainty evidence) and appeared to result in little to no difference in grade 3/4 neurotoxicity (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.46; 162 participants; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). There was probably little to no difference in the proportions experiencing dose delays when taxanes are given first compared to anthracyclines given first (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.12; 238 participants; 3 studies, 4 treatment comparisons; moderate-certainty evidence). One study reported on quality of life and indicated that scores (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) validated questionnaire) were similar in both groups though did not provide numerical data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the neoadjuvant setting, there is high- to low-certainty evidence of equivalent outcomes for the sequence in which taxanes are delivered. In the adjuvant setting, none of the studies reported on overall survival or disease-free survival. In most institutions, standard practice would be to deliver anthracycline followed by taxane, and currently available data do not support a change in this practice. We wait for the full-text publication of a relevant neoadjuvant study for women with HER2-negative breast cancer for inclusion in an update of this review.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer: A Time-Trends Study of the Korean Breast Cancer Registry Database

Purpose

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is rare, and its cause and prognosis are not well known. Additionally, treatment is limited with respect to the risk to the fetus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics and treatment trends of PABC and the survival rate according to the treatment.

Methods

In the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry database, women younger than 50 years and who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 1996 to 2015 were included. PABC was defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within 1 year after delivery.

Results

We examined 411 patients with PABC and 83,381 patients with non-PABC. Over time, the proportions of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy increased, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy administration rates also increased. In the past, the overall survival of patients with PABC was poorer than that of patients with non-PABC, but there was no difference in overall survival rates in more recent years. There was no difference in overall survival rates between patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–2.49; p=0.459), but PABC conferred poorer prognosis than non-PABC in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.27–2.08; p<0.001).

Conclusion

There was no difference in the prognosis between patients with PABC and those with non-PABC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The increase in neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to current treatment guidelines is expected to improve the survival rate of patients with PABC.

Phase 2 Study of Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Eribulin Mesylate With or Without Prophylactic Growth Factor for Adjuvant Treatment of Early-Stage Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Eribulin has significantly improved overall survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer who received ≥ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease. This trial assessed eribulin as adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, stage I to III breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 provided intravenously on day 1 of each 14-day cycle for 4 cycles, with pegfilgrastim on day 2, followed by 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 provided intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. There were 2 cohorts, as follows: cohort 1: no prophylactic growth factor with eribulin (allowed at physician's discretion only); cohort 2: prophylactic filgrastim with eribulin. The primary end point was feasibility, defined as the percentage of patients who completed the eribulin portion of the regimen without a dose omission, delay, or reduction due to an eribulin-related adverse event. Relative dose intensity of eribulin and toxicities are summarized by cohort. Exploratory end points included 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (cohort 1, n = 55; cohort 2, n = 26) entered the treatment phase; 88% completed treatment. Feasibility was 72.9 % (90% confidence interval, 60.4, 83.2) in cohort 1 and 60.0% (90% confidence interval, 41.7, 76.4) in cohort 2. The most frequent eribulin-related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (75.9%), peripheral neuropathy (54.4%), nausea (39.2%), neutropenia (35.4% [31.5% of patients in cohort 1; 44.0% in cohort 2]), and arthralgia (26.6%).

CONCLUSION

The primary end point of > 80% feasibility was not met. No unexpected adverse events were observed, and 62% of patients received full dosing with no dose delay or reduction. Further investigation of this regimen with alternative dosing schedules or use of growth factors could be considered.

Investigation of the antitumor activity and toxicity of long-circulating and fusogenic liposomes co-encapsulating paclitaxel and doxorubicin in a murine breast cancer animal model

To associate paclitaxel (PTX) with doxorubicin (DXR) is one of the main chemotherapy strategies for breast cancer (BC) management. Despite the high response rates for this combination, it presents a cardiotoxic synergism, attributed to pharmacokinetic interactions between PTX and both DXR and its metabolite, doxorubicinol. One of the main strategies to minimize the cardiotoxicity of the combination is to extend the interval of time between DXR and PTX administration. However, it has been previously suggested that their co-administration leads to better efficacy compared to their sequential administration. In the present study, we investigated different molar ratio combinations of PTX:DXR (10:1; 1:1, and 1:10) against the 4T1 murine breast cancer cell line and concluded that there is no benefit of enhancing PTX concentration above that of DXR on the combination. Therefore, we obtained a long-circulating and fusogenic liposomal formulation co-encapsulating PTX and DXR (LCFL-PTX/DXR) at a molar ratio of 1:10, respectively, which maintained the in vitro biological activity of the combination. This formulation was investigated for its antitumor activity and toxicity in Balb/c mice bearing 4T1 breast tumor, and compared to treatments with free PTX, free DXR, and the mixture of free PTX:DXR at 1:10 molar ratio. The higher tumor inhibition ratios were observed for the treatments with free and co-encapsulated PTX:DXR in liposomes (66.87 and 66.52%, respectively, P>0.05) as compared to the control. The great advantage of the treatment with LCFL-PTX/DXR was its improved cardiac toxicity profile. While degeneration was observed in the hearts of all animals treated with the free PTX:DXR combination, no signs of cardiac toxicity were observed for animals treated with the LCFL-PTX/DXR. Thus, LCFL-PTX/DXR enables the co-administration of PTX and DXR, and might be considered valuable for breast cancer management.

Total choline quantification measured by 1H MR spectroscopy as early predictor of response after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: The impact of immunohistochemical status

BACKGROUND

Validation of new biomarkers is essential for the early evaluation of neoadjuvant treatments.

PURPOSE

To determine whether measurements of total choline (tCho) by 1H spectroscopy could predict morphological or pathological complete response (pCR) of neoadjuvant treatment and whether breast cancer subgroups are related to prediction accuracy.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective, nonrandomized, monocentric, diagnostic study.

POPULATION

Sixty patients were initially included with 39 women participating in the final cohort.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 1.5T scanner was used for acquisition and MRS was performed using the syngo GRACE sequence.

ASSESSMENT

MRS and MRI examinations were performed at baseline (TP1), 24-72 hours after first chemotherapy (TP2), after the end of anthracycline treatment (TP3), and MRI only after the end of taxane treatment (TP4). Early (EMR) and late (LMR) morphological response were defined as %ΔDmax13 or %ΔDmax14, respectively. Responders were patients with %ΔDmax >30. Pathological complete response (pCR) patients achieved a residual cancer burden score of 0.

STATISTICAL TESTS

T-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, multiple regression, logistic regression, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

At TP1 there was a significant difference between response groups for tCho1 concerning EMR prediction (P = 0.05) and pCR (P < 0.05) and for K_ep 1 (P = 0.03) concerning LMR prediction. At TP2, no modification of tCho and other parameters could predict response. At TP3, ΔtCho, ΔDmax, and ΔVol could predict LMR (P < 0.05 for all parameters), pCR (P < 0.05 for all parameters), and ΔK^trans could predict only pCR (P = 0.04). Logistic regression at baseline showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9 for prediction of pCR. The triple negative (TN) subgroup showed significantly higher tCho at baseline (P = 0.02) and higher ΔtCho levels at TP3 (P < 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

Baseline measurements of tCho in combination with clinicopathological criteria could predict non-pCR with a high AUC. Furthermore, tCho quantification for prediction of pCR was more sensitive for TN tumors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:982-993.

A Systems Biology Approach Provides Deeper Insights into Differentially Expressed Genes in Taxane-Anthracycline Chemoresistant and Non-Resistant Breast Cancers

Objective: To date, numerous studies have been conducted to search for reasons for chemoresistance and differences in survival rates of patients receiving chemotherapy. We have sought to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between predicted chemotherapy resistance and sensitive phenotypes by a network as well as gene enrichment approach. Methods: Functional modules were explored with network analysis of DEGs in predicted neoadjuvant taxane-anthracycline resistance versus sensitive cases in the GSE25066 dataset, including 508 samples. A linear model was created by limma package in R to establish DEGs. Results: A gene set related to phagocytic vesicle membrane was found to be up-regulated in chemoresistance samples. Also, we found GO_CYTOKINE_ACTIVITY and GO_GROWTH_FACTOR BINDING to be up-regulated gene sets with the chemoresistance phenotype. Growth factors and cytokines are two groups of agents that induce the immune system to recruit APCs and promote tolerogenic phagocytosis. Some hub nodes like S100A8 were found to be important in the chemoresistant tumor cell network with associated high rank genes in GSEA. Conclusions: Functional gene sets and hub nodes could be considered as potential treatment targets. Moreover, by screening and enrichment analysis of a chemoresistance network, ligands and chemical agents have been found that could modify significant gene sets like the phagocytic vesicle membrane functional gene set as a key to chemoresistance. They could also impact on down- or up-regulated hub nodes.

Randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative breast cancer (GENEVIEVE)

BACKGROUND

The GENEVIEVE study compared the pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/is ypN0/+) in patients with operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) treated with either cabazitaxel or paclitaxel.

METHODS

GENEVIEVE was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and the safety of four 3-weekly cycles cabazitaxel versus 12 weeks of paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment. Primary end-point was the pCR rate defined as the complete absence of invasive carcinoma on histological examination of the breast irrespective of lymph node involvement (ypT0/is, ypN0/+) after the taxane treatment. Patients could receive an anthracycline-based therapy thereafter.

RESULTS

Overall, 333 patients were randomised and started treatment with 74.7% and 83.2% of patients completing treatment in the cabazitaxel and paclitaxel arms, respectively. Patients in cabazitaxel arm had a significantly lower pCR rate compared to the paclitaxel arm (1.2% versus 10.8%; p = 0.001). A total of 42 (25.3%) patients in the cabazitaxel arm and 17 (10.2%) in the paclitaxel arm had at least one serious adverse event (p < 0.001). Dose reductions were observed in 9.6% patients in the cabazitaxel arm compared to 11.4% in the paclitaxel arm (p = 0.721). Main reason for dose reductions was non-haematological toxicities in 3.0% versus 7.8% (p = 0.087), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The GENEVIEVE study showed no short-term effect of cabazitaxel in triple-negative or luminal B/HER2-negative primary BC, while there seemed to be no differences in drug exposure and patient compliance between the two arms.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01779479.

Recent Advances in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer

In the last few decades, neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer has gained considerable therapeutic importance. Despite extensive clinical investigations, it has not yet been clarified whether neoadjuvant therapy would result in improved survival in comparison with the standard adjuvant setting in any subgroups of patients with breast cancer. Chemotherapy is especially effective in the treatment of endocrine insensitive tumors, and such ther-apeutic benefit can be assumed for patients with triple-negative, or hormone receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, dose escalation, modification of the therapeutic regimens according to early tumor response, as well as the optimal sequence of administration are still matters of debate. There is a current debate between clinical experts regarding the concomitant and sequential administration of carboplatin and capecitabine, respectively, as part of the standard neoadjuvant treatment, as well as the use of bevacizumab, as part of the preoperative treatment. In case of HER2 positive tumors, an anti-HER2 agent can be administered as part of the preoperative treatment, and according to preliminary clinical data, dual HER2 blockade can also be reasonable. Further, chemotherapy-free regimens can be justified in highly endocrine sensitive tumors, while immune modulating agents may also gain particular importance in the case of certain subtypes of breast cancer. Several small-molecule targeted therapies are under clinical investigation and are expected to provide new neoadjuvant treatment options. However, novel, more predictive biomarkers are required for further evaluation of the neoadjuvant therapies, as well as the effect of novel targeted agents intended to be incorporated into neoadjuvant therapy.

Cardiac safety of simultaneous anti-HER2 and anthracycline therapy

A long established oncological dogma requires that trastuzumab should not be given in combination with anthracyclines due to excessive synergistic cardiac morbidity. However, trastuzumab has been recently granted a license in the neoadjuvant setting with concurrent anthracylines. We discuss the role of anti-HER2 agents in breast cancer and their associated toxicities. Anthracycline chemotherapies are a central component of most adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer regimens. Cardiac toxicity due to anthracyclines is explored. Finally, in this article, we will discuss the evidence for concurrent administration of anthracyclines and HER2-targeted agents.

Nelfinavir targets multiple drug resistance mechanisms to increase the efficacy of doxorubicin in MCF-7/Dox breast cancer cells

Development of multidrug resistance (MDR) remains a significant problem in cancer chemotherapy and underscores the importance of using chemosensitizers. Well known MDR mechanisms include: (i) upregulation of drug-efflux; (ii) increased signaling via AKT; and (iii) decreased apoptosis. Therefore, chemosensitizers should target multiple resistance mechanisms. We investigated the efficacy of nelfinavir (NFV), a clinically approved anti-HIV drug, in increasing doxorubicin (DOX) toxicity in a MDR breast cancer cell line, MCF-7/Dox. As compared to parental MCF-7 cells, the MCF-7/Dox were 15-20 fold more resistant to DOX-induced cytotoxicity at 48 h post-exposure (DOX IC50 = 1.8 μM vs. 32.4 μM). Coexposures to NFV could significantly (p < 0.05) decrease DOX-IC50 in MCF-7/Dox cells. Multiple exposures to physiologic concentrations of NFV (2.25 μM or 6.75 μM) decreased DOX-IC50 by 21-fold and 50-fold, respectively. Interestingly, although single exposure to NFV transiently induced P-glycoprotein (P-gp) levels, multiple treatments with NFV inhibited both P-gp expression and efflux function, which increased intracellular DOX concentrations. Single exposure to NFV augmented the markers of cell-survival (AKT) and autophagy (LC3-II), whereas multiple exposures enabled suppression of both total AKT (t-AKT) and insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)-induced phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) levels. Multiple exposures to NFV also resulted in increased unfolded protein response (UPR) transducers, e.g. Grp78, p-PERK, p-eIF2α, and ATF-4; and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induced death sensors, e.g. CHOP & TRIB-3. Multiple exposures to NFV also abrogated the mitogenic effects of IGF-1. In mice carrying MCF-7/Dox tumor xenografts, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of NFV (20 mg/kg/day) and DOX (2 mg/kg/twice/wk) decreased tumor growth more significantly (p < 0.01) than either agent alone. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis revealed decreased p-AKT and Ki-67 levels. Thus, NFV overcomes MDR in breast cancer cells and should be tested as an adjunct to chemotherapy.

Breast cancer in pregnancy: A brief clinical review

As global wealth increases and demographic changes similar to Europe and North America start affecting other societies, the global breast cancer epidemic will coincide with a delayed maternal age during first and subsequent pregnancies. Breast cancer in pregnancy will continue to increase, and standardized treatment strategies are required to be developed. This study will review current diagnostic and treatment approaches.