Significantly longer time to deterioration of quality of life due to CANKADO PRO-React eHealth support in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib and endocrine therapy: Primary outcome analysis of the multicenter randomized AGO-B WSG PreCycle trial

BACKGROUND

The multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup AGO-B WSG PreCycle trial (NCT03220178) evaluated the impact of CANKADO-based ePRO (electronic patient-reported outcomes) assessment on quality of life (QoL) in HR+ HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving palbociclib (P) and an aromatase inhibitor or P+fulvestrant. CANKADO PRO-React, an EU-registered medical device, is an interactive autonomous application reacting to patient self-reported observations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2017 and 2021, 499 patients (median age 59 years) from 71 centers were randomized (2:1, stratified by therapy line) between an active version of CANKADO PRO-React (CANKADO-active arm) or a version with limited functionality (CANKADO-inform arm). 412 patients (271 CANKADO-active; 141 CANKADO-inform) were available for analysis of the primary endpoint, time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL (10-point drop on FACT-G), using an Aalen-Johansen estimator for cumulative incidence function of TTD DQoL with 95% pointwise confidence intervals (CI). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, and DQoL (QoL deterioration).

RESULTS

In all pts (ITT-ePRO), cumulative incidence of DQoL was significantly more favorable (lower) in the CANKADO-active arm (HR=0.698, 95%CI [0.506 - 0.963]). Among 1^stL patients (n=295), the corresponding HR was 0.716 (0.484-1.060; p=0.09), and in 2^ndL patients (n=117) it was 0.661 (0.374-1.168; p=0.2). Absolute patient numbers declined in later visits; FACT-G completion rates were 80% and higher until about visit 30; mean FACT-G scores showed steady decline from baseline and an offset in favor of CANKADO-active. No significant differences in clinical outcome were observed between arms: Median PFS (ITT population) was 21.4 (95%CI 19.4-23.7) (CANKADO-active) and 18.7 (15.1-23.5) months (CANKADO-inform); median OS was not reached (CANKADO-active) and 42.6 months (CANKADO-inform).

CONCLUSIONS

PreCycle is the first multicenter randomized eHealth trial demonstrating a significant benefit for MBC patients receiving oral tumor therapy when using an interactive autonomous patient empowerment application.

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase II study to evaluate the tolerability of an induction dose escalation of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (DESIREE)

BACKGROUND

Stomatitis is one of the main reasons to discontinue everolimus in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). To decrease stomatitis and subsequently early treatment discontinuations or dose reductions, the DESIREE trial investigated the use of a stepwise dose-escalation schedule of everolimus (EVE esc).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DESIREE is a phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and progression/relapse after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor treatment. Patients were randomised to EVE esc (2.5 mg/day, week 1; 5 mg/day, week 2; 7.5 mg/day, week 3; 10 mg/day, weeks 4-24) or everolimus 10 mg/day (EVE 10mg) for 24 weeks plus exemestane. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stomatitis episodes grade ≥2 within 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints included toxicity, relative total dose intensity (RTDI) and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were randomised and 156 started treatment (EVE esc: 80; EVE 10mg: 76). The median age of patients was 64 years (range 33-85), 56.3% patients in the EVE esc arm versus 42.1% in the EVE 10mg arm had liver metastasis (P = 0.081) and 62.5% versus 51.3% received over one metastatic therapy line (P = 0.196). Within 12 weeks, the incidence of stomatitis episodes grade ≥2 was significantly lower in the EVE esc arm compared with the EVE 10mg arm (28.8% versus 46.1%; odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.92; P = 0.026). Toxicity was in line with the known safety profile without new safety concerns. The median RTDI was 91.1% in the EVE esc arm versus 80.0% in the EVE 10mg arm (P = 0.329). Discontinuation rate in the first 3 weeks was 6.3% versus 15.8%, respectively (P = 0.073). QoL was comparable between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose-escalation schema of everolimus over 3 weeks can be successfully used to reduce the incidence of high-grade stomatitis in the first 12 weeks of treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02387099; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02387099.

Adjuvant Abemaciclib Combined with Endocrine Therapy for High Risk Early Breast Cancer: Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes From the monarchE Study

BACKGROUND

In monarchE, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high risk, early breast cancer demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus ET alone. Detailed safety analyses conducted at a median follow-up of 27 months and key patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment (n=5591). Safety analyses included incidence, management, and outcomes of common and clinically relevant adverse events (AEs). Patient-reported health-related quality-of-life, ET symptoms, fatigue, and side effect burden were assessed.

RESULTS

The addition of abemaciclib to ET resulted in higher incidence of Grade≥3 AEs (49.7% vs 16.3% with ET alone), predominantly laboratory cytopenias (e.g., neutropenia [19.6%]) without clinical complications. Abemaciclib-treated patients experienced more serious adverse events (SAEs; 13.3% vs 7.8%). Discontinuation of abemaciclib and/or ET due to AEs occurred in 18.5% of patients, mainly due to Grade1/2 AEs (66.8%). AEs were managed with comedications (e.g., antidiarrheals), abemaciclib dose holds (61.7%), and/or dose reductions (43.4%). Diarrhea was generally low grade (Grade1/2: 77%); Grade2/3 events were highest in the first month (20.5%), most short-lived (≤7 days) and did not recur. Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were higher with abemaciclib+ET (2.5%) vs ET (0.6%); in the abemaciclib arm, increased VTE risk was observed with tamoxifen vs AIs (4.3% vs 1.8%). PROs were similar between arms, including being 'bothered by side effects of treatment', except for diarrhea. At ≥3 months, most patients reporting diarrhea reported "a little bit" or "somewhat".

CONCLUSION

In patients with high risk EBC, adjuvant abemaciclib+ET has an acceptable safety profile and tolerability is supported by PRO findings. Most AEs were reversible and manageable with comedications and/or dose modifications, consistent with the known abemaciclib toxicity profile.

Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In the phase III IMpassion130 trial, combining atezolizumab with first-line nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) showed a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive populations, and a clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) effect in PD-L1-positive aTNBC. The phase III KEYNOTE-355 trial adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for aTNBC showed similar PFS effects. IMpassion131 evaluated first-line atezolizumab-paclitaxel in aTNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients [no prior systemic therapy or ≥12 months since (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy] were randomised 2:1 to atezolizumab 840 mg or placebo (days 1, 15), both with paclitaxel 90 mg/m² (days 1, 8, 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were tumour PD-L1 status, prior taxane, liver metastases and geographical region. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS, tested hierarchically first in the PD-L1-positive [immune cell expression ≥1%, VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay] population, and then in the ITT population. OS was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Of 651 randomised patients, 45% had PD-L1-positive aTNBC. At the primary PFS analysis, adding atezolizumab to paclitaxel did not improve investigator-assessed PFS in the PD-L1-positive population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.12; P = 0.20; median PFS 6.0 months with atezolizumab-paclitaxel versus 5.7 months with placebo-paclitaxel]. In the PD-L1-positive population, atezolizumab-paclitaxel was associated with more favourable unconfirmed best overall response rate (63% versus 55% with placebo-paclitaxel) and median duration of response (7.2 versus 5.5 months, respectively). Final OS results showed no difference between arms (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.64; median 22.1 months with atezolizumab-paclitaxel versus 28.3 months with placebo-paclitaxel in the PD-L1-positive population). Results in the ITT population were consistent with the PD-L1-positive population. The safety profile was consistent with known effects of each study drug.

CONCLUSION

Combining atezolizumab with paclitaxel did not improve PFS or OS versus paclitaxel alone. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03125902.

Abstract P1-17-07: Cancer management and outcome of very young non-pregnant patients with breast cancer diagnosed at 40 years or younger– GBG 29

Introduction

Breast cancer diagnosed in young women who are 40 years (yrs) or younger is a relatively rare disease. However, it represents the most common cause of cancer-related deaths in this age-group. Furthermore, young age at diagnosis is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and worse survival. To date, general concepts concerning oncological cancer management should be driven by clinicopathological tumor characteristics and should adhere to standardized protocols for patients in general, but little is known about the oncological cancer treatment and outcome of this very young women in today's clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

The breast cancer in pregnancy registry study (BCP/GBG29/BIG 03-02) is a multicenter, international, observational study. BCP was established to investigate the oncological management and outcome of breast cancer in pregnancy. Since 2014 non-pregnant patients who are 40 yrs or younger are eligible if diagnosed with histological confirmed invasive breast cancer, independent of the type of treatment as control cohort. All patients received oncological treatment according to local standards. In this study the following endpoints will be analyzed descriptively for the young non-pregnant women cohort: breast cancer staging at diagnosis, biological characteristics of breast cancer at diagnosis, diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, toxicity, pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, disease-free survival and overall survival.

Results

From February 2014 until June 2018, 969 non-pregnant patients ≤40 yrs have been registered. The median age at diagnosis was 35 yrs (range 19-40). Overall, 90.1% of patients had a stage T1-2 at diagnosis and 67.1% of patients had negative lymph nodes. 86.7% of tumors were invasive ductal carcinomas and 4.1% lobular carcinomas. Grading (G) 3 was reported in 55.5%. 26.6% of tumors were luminal A-like (ER- and/or PgR-positive, HER2-negative, G1-2), 40.0% luminal B-like (ER- and/or PgR-positive, HER2-negative, G3 or ER- and/or PgR-positive, HER2-positive, any G), 7.7% HER2 positive non-luminal-like, and 25.7% triple negative breast cancers. 3.8% of young non-pregnant patients had metastatic disease at primary diagnosis.

Conclusion

This registry comprises a large cohort of young non-pregnant patients with breast cancer diagnosed at the age of 40 yrs or younger and provides important data about a modern breast cancer treatment as well as oncological outcome in this setting of young women. Further results including oncological management, toxicity, and survival will be presented at the meeting.

Citation Format: Seiler S, Schmatloch S, Reinisch M, Neunhöffer T, Schmidt M, Bechtner C, Marmé F, Wagner M, Möbus V, Reimer T, Kleine-Tebbe A, Sinn B, Stickeler E, Untch M, Janni W, Seither F, Loibl S. Cancer management and outcome of very young non-pregnant patients with breast cancer diagnosed at 40 years or younger– GBG 29 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-07.

Abstract P1-17-01: Development of brain metastases in breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant trials Geparquinto and Geparsixto

Background: The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in breast cancer patients is rising and has become a major clinical challenge. So far, the incidence of BM after modern neoadjuvant treatment is not clear.

Materials and Methods: In Geparquinto, patients with untreated HER2-positive breast cancer (n=615) received either lapatinib or trastuzumab, patients with HER2 negative breast cancer (n=1925) received bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline and taxane-containing regimen and those not responding paclitaxel and everolimus (n=32). In Geparsixto, patients with HER2-positive tumors (n=273) received trastuzumab and lapatinib and patients with triple-negative tumors (n=315) received bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy. We analyzed clinical factors associated with the occurrence of BM as first site of metastatic relapse after neoadjuvant treatment in both trials (n=3160).

Results: After a median follow-up of 61 months, 108 (3%) of a total of 3160 patients developed BM as first site of recurrence and 411 (13%) patients had distant metastases outside the brain. Brain metastases as first site of recurrence occurred later than other metastases (3--year-relapse free-rate 96.7% for patients who developed BM and 89.5% for patients who developed metastases outside the brain). Regarding subtypes of the primary tumor, 1% of luminal A (11/954), 2% of luminal B (7/381), 4% of HER2 positive (34/809) and 6% of triple-negative patients (56/1008) developed BM as first site of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for the development of BM were larger tumor size (cT3-4; HR 1.9, 95%-CI 1.3-2.8, p=0.0022), node positive disease (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8-4.4, p<0.0001), no pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.7, p=0.0003) and HER2 positive (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.9-7.8, p=0.0002) or triple-negative subtype (HR 8.1, 95% CI 4.2 – 15.8, p< 0.0001). Breast cancer subtype remained the most relevant risk factor for BM. Patients who developed BM were more often HER2 positive or triple-negative tumors compared with patients who developed metastases outside the brain (HER2 positive subtype 32 vs. 19%, triple-negative subtype 52 vs. 40%, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Especially patients with HER2-positive and triple negative tumors are at risk of developing BM despite active systemic treatment. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms is required in order to develop potential preventive strategies.

Citation Format: Witzel ID, Laakmann E, Fasching PA, Rezai M, Schem C, Solbach C, Tesch H, Klare P, Schneeweiss A, Zahm D, Blohmer J, Ingold-Heppner B, Huober J, Hanusch C, Jackisch C, Reinisch M, Untch M, von Minckwitz G, Müller V, Loibl S. Development of brain metastases in breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant trials Geparquinto and Geparsixto [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-01.

Abstract P5-20-09: Pharmacokinetic results of a subcutaneous injection of trastuzumab into the thigh versus into the abdominal wall in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer (BC) treated within the neo-/adjuvant GAIN-2 study

Background

A new subcutaneous (s.c.) formulation of trastuzumab became available in 2013 based on equivalent efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and safety with the standard intravenous (i.v.) administration, where the s.c. trastuzumab was administered only into the thigh. As an s.c. injection into the abdominal wall (abdw) might be more convenient for patients (pts) and health care professionals, the PK profile of s.c. trastuzumab injected into the thigh vs the abdw in pts with HER2+ early BC needs to be evaluated.

Methods

GAIN-2 study compared two intense dose-dense (idd) anthracycline/taxane containing regimens. After completion of the anthracycline and i.v. trastuzumab given concurrently with taxanes, HER2+ BC pts were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue adjuvant s.c. trastuzumab 600mg fixed dose injected every 3 weeks either into the thigh or the abdw. Randomization was stratified according to CT arm [(iddEnPC) vs tailored dd CT (dtEC-dtD)] and age (≤50 vs >50). Pts in the EnPC arm received 14 and in the dtEC-dtD arm 15 cycles of s.c. trastuzumab.

For the PK profile of s.c. trastuzumab serum samples collected before cycle 7, on days 2, 4, 8, 15 and 21 of cycle 7 are evaluated. With a total sample size of 30 (15 per group), the simulated 90% two-sided CI for the area under the plasma concentration (AUC0-last) will be (0.79-1.27) and for the peak drug concentration (Cmax) will be (0.77-1.30). Allowing for a dropout rate of 15%, 18 pts per group will be included in the PK analysis.

The primary objective was to assess the PK profile of s.c. trastuzumab injected into the thigh vs the abdw. The secondary objectives included safety and tolerability.

Results

The per-protocol (pp) set consists of 30 pts (17 in the thigh group and 13 in the abdw group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups. The log-transformed Geometric Least Square Means (GLSM) for Cmax were 11.77 and 11.52 in the thigh and the abdw group, respectively. The geo-mean ratio (on the original scale) for Cmax was 1.29 (90% CI 1.05-1.58). The log-transformed GLSM for AUC0-last were 14.54 and 14.28 in the thigh and the abdw group, respectively. The geo-mean ratio for AUC0-last was 1.29 (90% CI 1.02-1.63).

Overall 29 pts (96.7%) reported any grade and 5 pts (16.7%) high grade adverse events (AEs). The incidence of any grade AEs was similar between the two groups. The most common AEs were anemia (70.6% for the thigh vs 61.5% for the abdw group, p=0.705), leukopenia (80.0% for both groups, p=1.000) and fatigue (47.1% for the thigh vs 76.9% for the abdw group, p=0.141). 6 serious AEs were reported (2 in the thigh vs 4 in the abdw group). The final PK results of s.c. trastuzumab will be presented at the meeting.

Conclusions

Bioavailability of s.c. trastuzumab as reflected by peak and total exposure measured in cycle 7 was approx. 30% higher if administered into the thigh than into the abdw in pts with HER2+ primary BC treated after dose-dense CT plus i.v. trastuzumab. However, no increased toxicity was observed. Study limitations were that no cross-over design was used and number of pts satisfying criteria for pp-set were different in the arms.

Citation Format: Möbus V, Mahlberg R, Janni W, Tomé O, Marmé F, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, von der Assen A, Reinisch M, Lorenz R, Schmatloch S, Schmidt M, Sinn B, Klutinus N, Stickeler E, Untch M, Seiler S, Burchardi N, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S. Pharmacokinetic results of a subcutaneous injection of trastuzumab into the thigh versus into the abdominal wall in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer (BC) treated within the neo-/adjuvant GAIN-2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-20-09.

Abstract P1-13-04: Higher rate of severe toxicities in obese patients receiving dose-dense chemotherapy according to unadjusted body mass index – Results of the prospectively randomized GAIN study

Background: In routine clinical practice chemotherapy (CT) doses are frequently capped at a body surface area (BSA) of 2.0 m2 or adjusted to an ideal weight (i.e. [body length in cm - 10%] + 40% [current weight-ideal weight]) for obese patients (BMI>30 according to WHO) due to safety reasons. There are no data on CT dosing within intense dose-dense regimen for obese patients. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of the GAIN study population has been conducted.

Methods: Between August 2004 and July 2008 a total of 3023 patients were enrolled in the GAIN study, a randomized phase III adjuvant trial, comparing two types of dose-dense regimen. Patients were randomized to intense dose-dense ETC (Epirubicin 150 mg/m2, Paclitaxel 225 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 2500-2000 mg/m2, i.v. q15 for 3 cycles) or EC followed by T plus capecitabine (X) (EC-TX) (E 112.5 mg/m2 + C 600 mg/m2, i.v. q15 for 4 cycles followed by T 67.5 mg/m2 i.v. q8 for 10 weeks + X: 2000 mg/m2 p. o. day 1-14, q22 for 4 cycles). An adjustment of CT dose to an ideal weight for obese patients was implemented by a protocol amendment. Yet some patients received a dose adjustment by capping at 2.0 m2. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 543 patients with a BMI>30. Data on BSA and dose adjustment were collected from case report forms. Toxicities were compared between patients who received CT according to an unadjusted or adjusted BSA using the 2-sided exact test of Fisher. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results: Overall, 18.0% (n=543) of patients in the GAIN study were obese: 30.9% (n=168) of them received CT according to an unadjusted BSA. For the remainder BSA was adjusted to ideal weight or was capped at 2.0 m2 (69.1%; n=375). A total of 14.5% (n=24) of obese patients receiving full dose of chemotherapy vs 6.4% (n=24) of obese patients with an adjusted BSA experienced febrile neutropenia (p=0.005) and 9.6% (n=16) vs 2.9% (n=11) high grade thrombopenia (p=0.002). Overall, 16.7% (n=28) vs 10.1% (n=38) had a thromboembolic event (p=0.034), which was high grade in 12.5% (n=21) vs 6.4% (n=24), respectively (p=0.027) and 3.0% (n=5) vs 0.3% (n=1) experienced high grade hot flushes (p=0.012). The only significant differences in favor of the non-adjusted group were for dizziness (4.2% [n=7] vs 10.7% [n=40]; p=0.013), diarrhea (18.5% [n=31] vs 26.9% [n=101]; p=0.039) and an increase in serum creatinine (6.8% [n=11] vs 14.0% [n=52]; p=0.019). No differences in DFS and OS were observed between the two groups (5year DFS 81.9% [CI 74.9%-87.2%] vs 80.8% [76.3%-84.6%]; p=0.850; 5year OS 86.4% [79.9%-90.9%] vs 88.3% [84.4%-91.3%]; p=0.491).

Conclusion: This analysis of patients treated with a dose-dense regimen showed that obese patients who received CT according to their real BSA have a higher risk of severe toxicities, in particular of febrile neutropenia, high grade thrombopenia and high grade thromboembolic events. Therefore, a dose adjustment of intense dose-dense CT should be performed for obese patients to avoid life-threatening complications.

Citation Format: Furlanetto J, Eiermann W, Marmé F, Reimer T, Reinisch M, Schmatloch S, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Möbus V. Higher rate of severe toxicities in obese patients receiving dose-dense chemotherapy according to unadjusted body mass index – Results of the prospectively randomized GAIN study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-04.

[Thoracic intervertebral disk displacement: a rare differential diagnosis of segmental irritation--guidelines for use of chiropractic therapy]

Thoracic disc herniations rarely occur; they vary with respect to the clinical symptomatic and do not always lead to neurological deficit. A patient is being reported on with first symptoms of unspecific back pain. The patient has been frequently treated within 12 months (at regular intervals) exclusively by chiropractic manipulation without a considerable success. It is the objective of this case report that in persistent and therapy resistant back pain without obvious neurological deficite beside native radiographs further diagnostic investigation (MRI) is indicated. Concerning chiropractic manipulations (mobilisation techniques with impulse) this paper recommends testing maneuvers, the consideration of contraindications (structural lesions, neurological deficite) and emphasizes the use of atraumatic manipulation techniques.

0.2-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of internal lesions of the knee joint: a prospective arthroscopically controlled clinical study

The results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared with those of arthroscopy in a prospective series of 244 patients. A dedicated system for MRI of limbs and peripheral joints--the 0.2-T Artoscan (Esaote, Italy)--was used for imaging knee joint lesions. T1-weighted spin-echo sagittal images, T2-weighted gradient-echo coronal images, and axial views for lesions of the femoropatellar joint were acquired. Paraxial sagittal and oblique coronal views were obtained for imaging of the cruciate ligaments. This protocol allowed excellent visualization of the cruciate ligaments and medial and lateral meniscus in almost all patients. Compared with arthroscopy performed within 48 h after imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 93%, 97%, and 95% for tears of the medial meniscus; 82%, 96%, and 93% for tears of the lateral meniscus; 100%, 100%, and 100% for tears of the posterior cruciate ligament; 98%, 98%, and 97% for tears of the anterior cruciate ligament; and 72%, 100%, and 92% for full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. The examination can be performed within 30-45 min at lower cost than diagnostic arthroscopy. MRI with a 0.2-T magnet is a safe and valuable adjunct to the clinical examination of the knee and an aid to efficient preoperative planning.

[Prospective comparison of ARTOSCAN-MRI and arthroscopy in knee injuries]

The results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared with those of arthroscopy in a prospective series of 276 patients. A "dedicated system" for MRI of limbs and peripheral joints--the 0,2 Tesla ARTOSCAN (ESAOTE, Italy)--was used for imaging knee joint lesions. T1-weighted spin echo sagittal images, T2-weighted gradient-echo coronal images, and axial views for lesions of bone and the femoropatellar joint were acquired. If necessary paraxial sagittal and oblique coronal views were obtained for imaging of the cruciate ligaments. This protocol allowed excellent visualization of the cruciate ligaments, medial and lateral meniscus in almost all patients. Compared with arthroscopy performed within 48 hours after imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively, 91, 92 and 91 per cent for tears of the medial meniscus; 80, 96, and 92 per cent for tears of the posterior meniscus; 100, 100, and 100 per cent for tears of the posterior cruciate ligament; 93, 98, and 99 per cent for tears of the anterior cruciate ligament; and 73, 100, and 92 per cent for full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. The examination can be performed within 30 to 45 minutes at a cost that is lower than that of diagnostic arthroscopy. ARTOSCAN imaging is a safe and valuable adjunct to the clinical examination of the knee and an aid to efficient preoperative planning.

[Treadmill versus field trial. Movement analysis and pressure distribution in the athletic shoe]

Our current knowledge on interactions between runner and runningshoe is mainly based on treadmill measurements. In order to reveal stress load and adaptation on playing surfaces it was necessary to develop a combined measuring device out of 3-D video motion analysis and portable pressure measurement system. By means of a motor driven cart moving parallel to the subject with comparable position of cameras to the treadmill test it was possible to set up an identical trial for track and field. 12 subjects (male, age 24-32, size 9) were tested at a speed of 2.8 m/s. The varying conditions were treadmill and grass and two different constructed running shoes. 200 cycles and over 1000 steps were analyzed. The quantitative analysis of 37 parameters describing the contact phase was performed using the wilcoxon test for paired samples.-A qualitative comparison of running styles was introduced by using angle-angle-diagrams (knee and ankle by 3-D data) similar to those first described for 2-D by P.R. Cavanagh in 1973. It showed a huge interindividual variability under same conditions. Comparing the angle-angle-diagrams for the four different running conditions it was possible to classify them into three characteristic groups: non-adaptors, surface-adaptors and shoe-adaptors. Comparing track and field to treadmill measurements significant differences were found for the knee at impact: On treadmill the initial knee angle was 4.6 degrees more extended at a 13% higher angle velocity and a 30% higher angle deceleration (sig. p less than 0.05). A 7.3% higher impulse was found on grass at a 5.9% higher step length. No difference in maximum pressure was found. These results show that adaptation is performed mainly by the knee. Changing the motion pattern the knee seems to be capable of homogenizing the different stress loads to the foot. Comparing the running shoes significant differences were found in the motion of the ankle: a controversial behaviour was found to be on treadmill and grass. The pressure data revealed significant differences for the treadmill test to be in the heel area, for grass in the arch area. This points to an--up to now--unknown importance of the arch on unplain surfaces that are obviously influenced by the construction of the shoe and are not accessible by treadmill tests. The described different behaviour of shoes in treadmill and track and field tests points out the reduced validity of single treadmill tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)