1
|
Rugo HS, O'Shaughnessy J, Boyle F, Toi M, Broom R, Blancas I, Gumus M, Yamashita T, Im YH, Rastogi P, Zagouri F, Song C, Campone M, San Antonio B, Shahir A, Hulstijn M, Brown J, Zimmermann A, Wei R, Johnston S, Reinisch M, Tolaney SM. Adjuvant Abemaciclib Combined with Endocrine Therapy for High Risk Early Breast Cancer: Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes From the monarchE Study. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:616-627. [PMID: 35337972 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In monarchE, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high risk, early breast cancer demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus ET alone. Detailed safety analyses conducted at a median follow-up of 27 months and key patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment (n=5591). Safety analyses included incidence, management, and outcomes of common and clinically relevant adverse events (AEs). Patient-reported health-related quality-of-life, ET symptoms, fatigue, and side effect burden were assessed. RESULTS The addition of abemaciclib to ET resulted in higher incidence of Grade≥3 AEs (49.7% vs 16.3% with ET alone), predominantly laboratory cytopenias (e.g., neutropenia [19.6%]) without clinical complications. Abemaciclib-treated patients experienced more serious adverse events (SAEs; 13.3% vs 7.8%). Discontinuation of abemaciclib and/or ET due to AEs occurred in 18.5% of patients, mainly due to Grade1/2 AEs (66.8%). AEs were managed with comedications (e.g., antidiarrheals), abemaciclib dose holds (61.7%), and/or dose reductions (43.4%). Diarrhea was generally low grade (Grade1/2: 77%); Grade2/3 events were highest in the first month (20.5%), most short-lived (≤7 days) and did not recur. Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were higher with abemaciclib+ET (2.5%) vs ET (0.6%); in the abemaciclib arm, increased VTE risk was observed with tamoxifen vs AIs (4.3% vs 1.8%). PROs were similar between arms, including being 'bothered by side effects of treatment', except for diarrhea. At ≥3 months, most patients reporting diarrhea reported "a little bit" or "somewhat". CONCLUSION In patients with high risk EBC, adjuvant abemaciclib+ET has an acceptable safety profile and tolerability is supported by PRO findings. Most AEs were reversible and manageable with comedications and/or dose modifications, consistent with the known abemaciclib toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA.
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas TX, USA
| | - F Boyle
- Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Mater Hospital, Sydney; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Toi
- Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - R Broom
- Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - I Blancas
- Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain; Medicine Department. University of Granada, Spain
| | - M Gumus
- Istanbul Medeniyet University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Y-H Im
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - P Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - F Zagouri
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - C Song
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - M Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes / Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - A Shahir
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - M Hulstijn
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - J Brown
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S Johnston
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Reinisch
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harbeck N, Rastogi P, Martin M, Tolaney SM, Shao ZM, Fasching PA, Huang CS, Jaliffe GG, Tryakin A, Goetz MP, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Testa L, Andersson M, Tamura K, Del Mastro L, Steger GG, Kreipe H, Hegg R, Sohn J, Guarneri V, Cortés J, Hamilton E, André V, Wei R, Barriga S, Sherwood S, Forrester T, Munoz M, Shahir A, San Antonio B, Nabinger SC, Toi M, Johnston SRD, O'Shaughnessy J. Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: updated efficacy and Ki-67 analysis from the monarchE study. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1571-1581. [PMID: 34656740 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) previously demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer at the second interim analysis, however follow-up was limited. Here, we present results of the prespecified primary outcome analysis and an additional follow-up analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This global, phase III, open-label trial randomized (1 : 1) 5637 patients to adjuvant ET for ≥5 years ± abemaciclib for 2 years. Cohort 1 enrolled patients with ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), or 1-3 positive ALNs and either grade 3 disease or tumor ≥5 cm. Cohort 2 enrolled patients with 1-3 positive ALNs and centrally determined high Ki-67 index (≥20%). The primary endpoint was IDFS in the intent-to-treat population (cohorts 1 and 2). Secondary endpoints were IDFS in patients with high Ki-67, DRFS, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS At the primary outcome analysis, with 19 months median follow-up time, abemaciclib + ET resulted in a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an IDFS event [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.87; nominal P = 0.0009]. At the additional follow-up analysis, with 27 months median follow-up and 90% of patients off treatment, IDFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; nominal P < 0.0001) and DRFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83; nominal P < 0.0001) benefit was maintained. The absolute improvements in 3-year IDFS and DRFS rates were 5.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Whereas Ki-67 index was prognostic, abemaciclib benefit was consistent regardless of Ki-67 index. Safety data were consistent with the known abemaciclib risk profile. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib + ET significantly improved IDFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer, with an acceptable safety profile. Ki-67 index was prognostic, but abemaciclib benefit was observed regardless of Ki-67 index. Overall, the robust treatment benefit of abemaciclib extended beyond the 2-year treatment period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of OB & GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - P Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Z M Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - P A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - C S Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - G G Jaliffe
- Grupo Medico Camino S.C., Mexico City, Mexico
| | - A Tryakin
- N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - H S Rugo
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - E Senkus
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - L Testa
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - K Tamura
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - L Del Mastro
- IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, UO Breast Unit, Genoa, Italy; Università di Genova, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIM), Genoa, Italy
| | - G G Steger
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Kreipe
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - R Hegg
- Clin. Pesq. e Centro São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Sohn
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - J Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid & Barcelona, and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Hamilton
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, USA
| | - V André
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - R Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S Barriga
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S Sherwood
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | - M Munoz
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - A Shahir
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | | | - M Toi
- Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abu-Omar Y, Taghavi FJ, Navaratnarajah M, Ali A, Shahir A, Yu LM, Choong CK, Taggart DP. The impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on postoperative renal function. Perfusion 2011; 27:127-31. [PMID: 22115880 DOI: 10.1177/0267659111429890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A number of risk factors have been recognised for postoperative renal dysfunction following on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). There are, however, few studies that have evaluated the potential reno-protective effects of off-pump CABG in the presence of other confounding risk factors. The aim of this study was to determine if off-pump CABG reduces the risk of renal injury. METHODS Serum creatinine values (preoperatively and day 1, 2 and 4 postoperatively) and other clinical data were prospectively collected on 1580 consecutive patients who underwent first-time CABG from 2002 to 2005. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault equation. The effect of on-pump vs. off-pump CABG on renal function was analysed, adjusting for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular (LV) function and preoperative creatinine clearance, using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS One thousand one hundred and forty-five (73%) patients underwent on-pump CABG and 435 (27%) underwent off-pump CABG. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender and diabetes. Two hundred and seventy-four (17%) patients were females and 274 (17%) patients had diabetes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly lower creatinine clearance postoperatively in patients with diabetes (P<0.001) and advanced age (P<0.001). The on-pump group had significantly lower postoperative creatinine clearance in comparison to the off-pump group (P= 0.01). The effect remained consistent after adjusting for potential risk factors (age, diabetes, gender, LV function and preoperative creatinine clearance) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Off-pump surgery is associated with a reduction in postoperative renal injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Abu-Omar
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|