1
|
Goetz MP, Bagegni NA, Batist G, Brufsky A, Cristofanilli MA, Damodaran S, Daniel BR, Fleming GF, Gradishar WJ, Graff SL, Grosse Perdekamp MT, Hamilton E, Lavasani S, Moreno-Aspitia A, O'Connor T, Pluard TJ, Rugo HS, Sammons SL, Schwartzberg LS, Stover DG, Vidal GA, Wang G, Warner E, Yerushalmi R, Plourde PV, Portman DJ, Gal-Yam EN. Lasofoxifene versus fulvestrant for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation: results from the randomized, phase II ELAINE 1 trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1141-1151. [PMID: 38072514 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired estrogen receptor alpha (ER/ESR1) mutations commonly cause endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene, a novel selective ER modulator, stabilizes an antagonist conformation of wild-type and ESR1-mutated ER-ligand binding domains, and has antitumor activity in ESR1-mutated xenografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, randomized, phase II, multicenter, ELAINE 1 study (NCT03781063), we randomized women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) mBC that had progressed on an aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) to oral lasofoxifene 5 mg daily or IM fulvestrant 500 mg (days 1, 15, and 29, and then every 4 weeks) until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability. RESULTS A total of 103 patients received lasofoxifene (n = 52) or fulvestrant (n = 51). The most current efficacy analysis showed that lasofoxifene did not significantly prolong median PFS compared with fulvestrant: 24.2 weeks (∼5.6 months) versus 16.2 weeks (∼3.7 months; P = 0.138); hazard ratio 0.699 (95% confidence interval 0.434-1.125). However, PFS and other clinical endpoints numerically favored lasofoxifene: clinical benefit rate (36.5% versus 21.6%; P = 0.117), objective response rate [13.2% (including a complete response in one lasofoxifene-treated patient) versus 2.9%; P = 0.124], and 6-month (53.4% versus 37.9%) and 12-month (30.7% versus 14.1%) PFS rates. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events with lasofoxifene were nausea, fatigue, arthralgia, and hot flushes. One death occurred in the fulvestrant arm. Circulating tumor DNA ESR1 mutant allele fraction (MAF) decreased from baseline to week 8 in 82.9% of evaluable lasofoxifene-treated versus 61.5% of fulvestrant-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Lasofoxifene demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity versus fulvestrant and was well tolerated in patients with ESR1-mutated, endocrine-resistant mBC following progression on AI plus CDK4/6i. Consistent with target engagement, lasofoxifene reduced ESR1 MAF, and to a greater extent than fulvestrant. Lasofoxifene may be a promising targeted treatment for patients with ESR1-mutated mBC and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
| | - N A Bagegni
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - G Batist
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - A Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Magee Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh
| | - M A Cristofanilli
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York
| | - S Damodaran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston
| | | | - G F Fleming
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago
| | - W J Gradishar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - S L Graff
- Lifespan Cancer Institute/Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence
| | | | - E Hamilton
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville
| | - S Lavasani
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, UC Irvine, Orange
| | | | - T O'Connor
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Buffalo
| | - T J Pluard
- Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City
| | - H S Rugo
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - S L Sammons
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | - D G Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - G A Vidal
- Breast Oncology Division, West Cancer Center, Memphis
| | - G Wang
- Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health, Miami, USA
| | - E Warner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Yerushalmi
- Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - E N Gal-Yam
- Breast Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Damodaran S, O'Sullivan CC, Elkhanany A, Anderson IC, Barve M, Blau S, Cherian MA, Peguero JA, Goetz MP, Plourde PV, Portman DJ, Moore HCF. Open-label, phase II, multicenter study of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating women with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer and an ESR1 mutation after disease progression on prior therapies: ELAINE 2. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1131-1140. [PMID: 38072513 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired ESR1 mutations in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) drive treatment resistance and tumor progression; new treatment strategies are needed. Lasofoxifene, a next-generation, oral, endocrine therapy and tissue-specific ER antagonist, provided preclinical antitumor activity, alone or combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in ESR1-mutated mBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the open-label, phase II, ELAINE 2 trial (NCT04432454), women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) mBC who progressed on prior therapies (including CDK4/6i) received lasofoxifene 5 mg/day and abemaciclib 150 mg b.i.d until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Twenty-nine women (median age 60 years) participated; all but one were previously treated with a CDK4/6i (median duration 2 years). The lasofoxifene-abemaciclib combination was well tolerated with primarily grade 1/2 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. One patient (with no prior CDK4/6i) discontinued treatment due to grade 2 diarrhea. No deaths occurred during the study. Median PFS was 56.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.9 weeks-not estimable; ∼13 months]; PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 76.1%, 56.1%, and 38.8%, respectively. CBR at 24 weeks was 65.5% (95% CI 47.3% to 80.1%). In 18 patients with measurable lesions, ORR was 55.6% (95% CI 33.7% to 75.4%). ESR1-mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allele fraction decreased from baseline to week 4 in 21/26 (80.8%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib had an acceptable safety profile, was well tolerated, and exhibited meaningful antitumor activity in women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- mBC after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i. Observed decreases in ESR1-mutant ctDNA with lasofoxifene concordant with clinical response suggest target engagement. If the ELAINE 2 findings are confirmed in the initiated, phase III, ELAINE 3 trial, these data could be practice-changing and help address a critical unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
| | | | - A Elkhanany
- Baylor College of Medicine, Duncan Cancer Center - Breast, Houston
| | | | - M Barve
- Mary Crowley Cancer Research, Dallas
| | - S Blau
- Oncology Division, Northwest Medical Specialties, PPLC, Puyallup
| | - M A Cherian
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | - J A Peguero
- Department of Research, Oncology Consultants PA, Houston
| | - M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | | | | | - H C F Moore
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harbeck N, Rastogi P, Martin M, Tolaney SM, Shao ZM, Fasching PA, Huang CS, Jaliffe GG, Tryakin A, Goetz MP, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Testa L, Andersson M, Tamura K, Del Mastro L, Steger GG, Kreipe H, Hegg R, Sohn J, Guarneri V, Cortés J, Hamilton E, André V, Wei R, Barriga S, Sherwood S, Forrester T, Munoz M, Shahir A, San Antonio B, Nabinger SC, Toi M, Johnston SRD, O'Shaughnessy J. Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: updated efficacy and Ki-67 analysis from the monarchE study. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1571-1581. [PMID: 34656740 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) previously demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer at the second interim analysis, however follow-up was limited. Here, we present results of the prespecified primary outcome analysis and an additional follow-up analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This global, phase III, open-label trial randomized (1 : 1) 5637 patients to adjuvant ET for ≥5 years ± abemaciclib for 2 years. Cohort 1 enrolled patients with ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), or 1-3 positive ALNs and either grade 3 disease or tumor ≥5 cm. Cohort 2 enrolled patients with 1-3 positive ALNs and centrally determined high Ki-67 index (≥20%). The primary endpoint was IDFS in the intent-to-treat population (cohorts 1 and 2). Secondary endpoints were IDFS in patients with high Ki-67, DRFS, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS At the primary outcome analysis, with 19 months median follow-up time, abemaciclib + ET resulted in a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an IDFS event [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.87; nominal P = 0.0009]. At the additional follow-up analysis, with 27 months median follow-up and 90% of patients off treatment, IDFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; nominal P < 0.0001) and DRFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83; nominal P < 0.0001) benefit was maintained. The absolute improvements in 3-year IDFS and DRFS rates were 5.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Whereas Ki-67 index was prognostic, abemaciclib benefit was consistent regardless of Ki-67 index. Safety data were consistent with the known abemaciclib risk profile. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib + ET significantly improved IDFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer, with an acceptable safety profile. Ki-67 index was prognostic, but abemaciclib benefit was observed regardless of Ki-67 index. Overall, the robust treatment benefit of abemaciclib extended beyond the 2-year treatment period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of OB & GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - P Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Z M Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - P A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - C S Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - G G Jaliffe
- Grupo Medico Camino S.C., Mexico City, Mexico
| | - A Tryakin
- N.N.Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - H S Rugo
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - E Senkus
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - L Testa
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - K Tamura
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - L Del Mastro
- IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, UO Breast Unit, Genoa, Italy; Università di Genova, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIM), Genoa, Italy
| | - G G Steger
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Kreipe
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - R Hegg
- Clin. Pesq. e Centro São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Sohn
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - J Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid & Barcelona, and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Hamilton
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, USA
| | - V André
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - R Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S Barriga
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - S Sherwood
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | - M Munoz
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | - A Shahir
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA
| | | | | | - M Toi
- Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Veeraraghavan J, De Angelis C, Mao R, Wang T, Herrera S, Pavlick AC, Contreras A, Nuciforo P, Mayer IA, Forero A, Nanda R, Goetz MP, Chang JC, Wolff AC, Krop IE, Fuqua SAW, Prat A, Hilsenbeck SG, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, Gutierrez C, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF, Schiff R. A combinatorial biomarker predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab without chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:927-933. [PMID: 30903140 PMCID: PMC6594453 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2-positive (+) breast cancers, defined by HER2 overexpression and/or amplification, are often addicted to HER2 to maintain their malignant phenotype. Yet, some HER2+ tumors do not benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. We hypothesize that HER2 amplification levels and PI3K pathway activation are key determinants of response to HER2-targeted treatments without chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Baseline HER2+ tumors from patients treated with neoadjuvant lapatinib plus trastuzumab [with endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumors] in TBCRC006 (NCT00548184) were evaluated in a central laboratory for HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 56). HER2 copy number (CN) and FISH ratios, and PI3K pathway status, defined by PIK3CA mutations or PTEN levels by immunohistochemistry were available for 41 tumors. Results were correlated with pathologic complete response (pCR; no residual invasive tumor in breast). RESULTS Thirteen of the 56 patients (23%) achieved pCR. None of the 11 patients with HER2 ratio <4 and/or CN <10 achieved pCR, whereas 13/45 patients (29%) with HER2 ratio ≥4 and/or CN ≥10 attained pCR (P = 0.0513). Of the 18 patients with tumors expressing high PTEN or wild-type (WT) PIK3CA (intact PI3K pathway), 7 (39%) achieved pCR, compared with 1/23 (4%) with PI3K pathway alterations (P = 0.0133). Seven of the 16 patients (44%) with HER2 ratio ≥4 and intact PI3K pathway achieved pCR, whereas only 1/25 (4%) patients not meeting these criteria achieved pCR (P = 0.0031). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that there is a clinical subtype in breast cancer with high HER2 amplification and intact PI3K pathway that is especially sensitive to HER2-targeted therapies without chemotherapy. A combination of HER2 FISH ratio and PI3K pathway status warrants validation to identify patients who may be treated with HER2-targeted therapy without chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Veeraraghavan
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - C De Angelis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - R Mao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - T Wang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine
| | - S Herrera
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - A C Pavlick
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - A Contreras
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - P Nuciforo
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I A Mayer
- Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - A Forero
- Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - R Nanda
- Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago
| | - M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - J C Chang
- Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston
| | - A C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - I E Krop
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - S A W Fuqua
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - A Prat
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S G Hilsenbeck
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine
| | - B Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - C Gutierrez
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - C K Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - M F Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine
| | - R Schiff
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Polley MYC, Dickler MN, Johnston S, Goetz MP, de la Haba J, Loibl S, Mehta RS, Bergh J, Roberston J, Barlow W, Liu H, Tenner K, Martin M. Abstract P2-07-05: A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced stage breast cancer treated with first-line endocrine therapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-07-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Endocrine based therapy is an effective strategy to manage hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, nearly all patients exhibit/develop either de novo or acquired resistance. While prognostic biomarkers of endocrine responsiveness are well established for the adjuvant treatment in ER+ breast cancer, less is known regarding prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response in the first line ABC setting. We sought to develop a clinical calculator based on clinical criteria for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of women with HR+/HER2- ABC who will be receiving endocrine monotherapy as first-line treatment for ABC.
Methods: The development of the clinical calculator will be based on data from modern clinical trials in women with HR+/HER2- ABC. The studies to be included in the final analyses are given in Table 1. The control arm data from trials1-6 will form the training dataset (N = 1,223) and be used to construct the clinical prediction models. Variables considered include age, race, ECOG status, disease measurability, body mass index, disease-free interval, number of metastatic sites, locations of metastatic sites, prior endocrine therapy, and prior chemotherapy. Missing values will be imputed using single imputation with all variables included in the imputation model. For continuous variables, restricted cubic splines will be used to determine if non-linear effects may be more appropriate. The Lasso regression will be used as a variable selection technique to reduce the dimensionality of covariates; initially all pairwise interactions will be included in the model. Following Lasso regression, the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models will be constructed for PFS and OS including only variables retained in Lasso. The final model will be internally validated for discrimination and calibration using 10-fold cross-validation. External validation will be performed using control arm data from EGF 30008 (N = 536).
Results: To date, control arm data from four trials (trials 1-4) have been received. The preliminary results presented here are based on pooled data from C40503 and LEA, for which data elements have been harmonized. Models for predicting PFS and OS have good calibration and are associated with bias-corrected C-indices of 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. These models will be updated using pooled data from trials 1-6.
Conclusions: Our preliminary data demonstrate that clinical calculators based on baseline clinical factors can provide accurate prediction of PFS and OS in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated with first-line ET. If validated, these tools may be used for risk stratification in future clinical trials and to identify patients who may require more or less aggressive therapy.
Table 1:Studies to be includedTrial NumberTrial NameTrial PISample Size in Control Arm1C40503Maura Dickler152 (letrozole)2LEAMiguel Martin179 (letrozole)3FACTJonas Bergh188 (anastrozole)4FALCONJohn Robertson194 (anastrozole)5S0226Rita Mehta345 (anastrozole)6MONARCH 3Matthew Goetz165 (nonsteroidal AI)7EGF 30008Stephen Johnston536 (letrozole)
Citation Format: Polley M-YC, Dickler MN, Johnston S, Goetz MP, de la Haba J, Loibl S, Mehta RS, Bergh J, Roberston J, Barlow W, Liu H, Tenner K, Martin M. A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced stage breast cancer treated with first-line endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-YC Polley
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - MN Dickler
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Johnston
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - J de la Haba
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Loibl
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - RS Mehta
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Bergh
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Roberston
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - W Barlow
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - K Tenner
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Martin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; GEICAM, Madrid, Spain; German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), Seattle, WA; Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Polley MY, Liu H, Kalari KR, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Cafourek V, Negron V, Ingle JN, Thompson KJ, Tang X, Barman P, Carlson E, Visscher DW, Carter JC, Couch FJ, Goetz MP. Abstract P3-08-01: Characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors of luminal androgen receptor (LAR) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-08-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The LAR subtype is a genomically distinct subset of TNBC. Using a large cohort of non-metastatic TNBC patients (pts) with long term follow-up, we sought to further characterize the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of LAR vs non-LAR TNBC.
Methods: From a cohort of 9982 women with surgically-treated non-metastatic breast cancer, 605 met criteria for TNBC (ER/PR<1% and HER2-negative) by central pathology. RNA extracted from 304 FFPE tumor specimens using the HighPure RNA extraction kit was subjected to TruSeq RNA Access library preparation and sequencing on a HiSeq2500. Adequate RNA was available for 283 pts. Tumors were classified as LAR or non-LAR using a shrunken centroid model, CABAL (Clustering Among BAsal and Luminal androgen receptor). In addition to previously described analyses [Leon-Ferre et al, Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017], immunohistochemical (IHC) androgen receptor (AR) staining was performed and the impact of various parameters on invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: 58 (20%) tumors were classified as LAR and 225 (80%) as non-LAR. Compared to non-LAR, LAR pts were older (mean age 65 vs 54) and more often postmenopausal (79%vs53%), both p=0.01. Apocrine histology was more common among LAR tumors (21%vs0%), which were also lower grade (grade3: 69%vs95%) and had lower Ki-67 (Ki-67>15%: 64%vs82%), all p<0.01. Additionally, LAR tumors had lower median stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs, 20%vs25%) and were less frequently lymphocyte-predominant [≥50% stromal or intratumoral TILs (19%vs32%)], although neither reached statistical significance. AR IHC was available for 223 of 283 tumors. Median AR IHC score in LAR was 65% (range 0-100%) vs 0% (range 0-90%) in non-LAR. T/N stage, surgery type, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) or radiotherapy were similar between LAR and non-LAR. LAR pts had shorter IDFS and OS compared to non-LAR (5.6 vs 11.8 yrs and 10.8 vs 20.8 yrs, respectively), although this did not reach statistical significance. Test of proportional hazard assumption was not significant for IDFS or OS (p = 0.30 and 0.09). IDFS estimates were numerically higher in LAR vs non-LAR (80.2%vs70.5%,p = 0.92) at 3yrs post-diagnosis; whereas the opposite was true (40.9%vs55.6%,p = 0.07) after 10yrs. OS estimates at 3 and 5yrs were similar between LAR and non-LAR, but at 10yrs OS was inferior in LAR (40.9%vs66.4%,p = 0.24). In a univariate analysis including both LAR and non-LAR, older age, higher N stage, lower TILs and absence of AdjCT were associated with poorer IDFS and OS. In a multivariate analysis, higher N stage and absence of AdjCT remained associated with both poorer IDFS and OS; while lower stromal TILs were associated with poorer IDFS (p=0.01), and with a trend towards poorer OS (p=0.07).
Conclusions: LAR TNBCs occurred in older women, were lower grade, and had lower TIL density than nonLAR tumors. While significant differences in IDFS or OS were not demonstrated, LAR pts exhibited a numerically lower risk of a disease event at 3yrs, but higher risk by 10yrs compared to nonLAR pts. In the entire cohort, higher N stage, absence of AdjCT and lower TILs were independently associated with poorer outcomes.
Citation Format: Leon-Ferre RA, Polley M-Y, Liu H, Kalari KR, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Cafourek V, Negron V, Ingle JN, Thompson KJ, Tang X, Barman P, Carlson E, Visscher DW, Carter JC, Couch FJ, Goetz MP. Characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors of luminal androgen receptor (LAR) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - H Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - MC Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - X Tang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goetz MP, Johnston S, Martin M, Tokunaga E, Park IH, Huober J, Toi M, Price GL, Boye M, Li L, Forrester T, Gainford C, Gable J, Carter GC, Sood A, DiLeo A. Abstract P6-16-01: Health-related quality of life in MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib plus an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy in women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-16-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In the MONARCH 3 trial, abemaciclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) significantly improved progression free survival and overall response rate with a generally tolerable safety profile compared to placebo plus AI. Here we report patient-reported outcomes (PRO) including health-related quality of life (Qol), functioning, and symptoms.
Methods: MONARCH 3 was a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus an AI in 493 post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer with no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Two European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires were included: Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-Core 30 (C30) and the EORTC QLQ-Breast 23 (BR23) that were assessed at baseline, every 2 cycles through cycle 19, then every 3 cycles until treatment discontinuation, and at short-term follow up. Higher scores on functional and health status/QoL outcomes indicate higher/better levels of functioning or health; conversely higher scores on symptom outcomes indicate higher/worse levels of symptom burden. Between-arm comparisons of change from baseline were conducted using mixed model methods. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 and clinical meaningfulness was set at ≥10 points on a 0-100 scale1.
Results: PRO completion rates were >91% through cycle 19; duration of treatment was longer for abemaciclib plus AI patients (median number of cycles 19 vs.15). Compared to the placebo arm, diarrhea PRO scores in the abemaciclib arm showed a clinically (18.68 points) and statistically significant (p<0.001) increase/worsening. By-cycle analysis showed group mean diarrhea scores returned to near-baseline levels post-therapy. Other symptom PROs showed statistically significant (<0.05) but not clinically meaningful differences; fatigue (4.96; p=0.004), systemic therapy side effects (4.48, p<0.001), appetite loss (4.03; p=0.034), and nausea/vomiting (2.77; p=0.013). These results were consistent with the investigator-reported treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Several non-symptom results were also statistically significant but not clinically meaningful including global health/health status (-4.36; p=0.003), role function (-4.25; p=0.025), social function (-3.41, p=0.047), and body image (-5.11, p=0.009). No statistically significant between-treatment differences were observed for physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning or for symptoms of pain, dyspnea, insomnia, constipation, or financial difficulties.
Conclusions: The addition of abemaciclib to an AI resulted in clinically and statistically significant changes in diarrhea without clinically meaningful differences in other symptom scores. Increased GI-related symptoms were consistent with the manageable, reversible AE profile; the highest symptom burden was reported during early visits. No clinically meaningful differences in global health status or functional scores were observed.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02246621
Reference:
1. Osoba D et al. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(14):3106-13.
Citation Format: Goetz MP, Johnston S, Martin M, Tokunaga E, Park IH, Huober J, Toi M, Price GL, Boye M, Li L, Forrester T, Gainford C, Gable J, Carter GC, Sood A, DiLeo A. Health-related quality of life in MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib plus an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy in women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-16-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - S Johnston
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - M Martin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - E Tokunaga
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - IH Park
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - J Huober
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - M Toi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - GL Price
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - M Boye
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - L Li
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - T Forrester
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - C Gainford
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - J Gable
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - GC Carter
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - A Sood
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - A DiLeo
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan; National Cancer Center, Goyangsi, Korea; University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India; Nuovo Ospedale di Prato S. Stefano – Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Cocco D, Day CN, Leon-Ferre R, Habermann EB, Goetz MP. Abstract P3-08-09: The 21-gene recurrence score and chemotherapy use in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive breast cancer: A National Cancer Database study. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-08-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The 21-gene (Oncotype DX) Recurrence Score (RS) is a multi-gene expression assay that is both prognostic and predictive of adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) benefit in estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2 negative breast cancer (BC). Use of the RS in TNBC and HER2+ BC is not recommended by national guidelines. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to evaluate whether oncologists use the RS in these subtypes. Additionally, we assessed the prognostic effects of the RS in node negative patients (pts) who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods
Pts with TN and HER2+ BC diagnosed from 2010-2015 in the NCDB were analyzed. Pts with neoadjuvant therapy or stage IV were excluded. Cases with RS testing were classified as low (RS 0-17), intermediate (RS 18-30) or high (RS 31+). Analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression; overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests.
Results
142,330 pts were evaluable: 64,830 TNBC and 77,500 HER2+ (21,768 ER-/HER2+ and 55,732 ER+/HER2+). In these subtypes, RS was performed in 5,369 (3.8%) pts as follows: 1,479 (2.3%) TNBC, 185 (0.8%) ER-/HER2+, and 3,705 (6.6%) ER+/HER2+. Given the small ER-/HER2+ cohort, we focused on TNBC and ER+/HER2+. Within these subtypes, factors associated with RS testing included lower grade, smaller pathologic tumor size, pathologic N0 status, white race, age 60-69, and ILC or IMC histology (each p<0.005).
Of the TNBC pts tested, the RS distribution was: low 16.3%, intermediate 13.1% and high 70.6%, while for ER+/HER2+ it was low 30.5%, intermediate 30.7% and high 38.8% (p<0.001).
AdjCT was less frequently recommended in pts with low RS; however, this varied by tumor subtype with AdjCT recommended for 66.8% of TNBC with low RS and 37.9% of ER+/HER2+ with low RS. For intermediate RS, rates of AdjCT recommendation were 74.3% and 73.7%, and for high RS were 94.0% and 93.2% for TNBC and ER+/HER2+ respectively.
In a multivariable analysis among pts with low RS, factors associated with AdjCT recommendation included younger age, larger pathologic tumor size, node positive disease, and higher grade.
In AdjCT untreated TNBC, 5 yr OS did not differ for low RS (96.5%) vs intermediate RS (95.2%, p=0.82). In contrast OS was significantly worse for high RS (76.7%) than the other two groups, each p≤0.04.
In AdjCT untreated ER+/HER2+, 5 yr OS was significantly better for low RS (96.7%) vs intermediate RS (92.5%, p=0.03) and vs high RS (92.1%, p=0.003), with no difference between intermediate RS vs high RS (p=0.32).
Evaluating pts who did receive AdjCT, there was no significant difference in 5 yr OS for either subtype according to RS (p=0.46 and p=0.83).
Interestingly, in patients with low RS, 5 yr OS was similar with or without AdjCT in both TNBC (89.5% vs 96.5%, p=0.25) and ER+/HER2+ (97.6% vs 96.7%, p=0.47).
Conclusions
RS testing is being conducted in a small fraction of pts with TN and HER2+ BC with lower clinical risk features. The observation that RS is prognostic for survival in AdjCT untreated patients is hypothesis generating, and suggests that further evaluation of the RS and other multigene assays in ER negative and HER2+ BC is warranted.
Citation Format: Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Cocco D, Day CN, Leon-Ferre R, Habermann EB, Goetz MP. The 21-gene recurrence score and chemotherapy use in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive breast cancer: A National Cancer Database study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JC Boughey
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - TL Hoskin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - D Cocco
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - CN Day
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - R Leon-Ferre
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - EB Habermann
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Maricopa Integrated Health, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Plourde PV, Schwartzberg LS, Greene GL, Portman DJ, Komm BS, Jenkins SN, Liu PY, Portman MD, Goetz MP. Abstract OT1-01-02: An open-label, randomized, multi-center phase 2 study evaluating the activity of lasofoxifene relative to fulvestrant for the treatment of postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic ER+/HER2 - breast cancer (MBC) with an ESR1 mutation. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot1-01-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Endocrine based therapy is the standard treatment for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) MBC. Agents targeting the ER pathway including aromatase inhibitors (AIs), fulvestrant and tamoxifen along with CDK 4/6 inhibitors are considered standard for first and 2nd line treatment. However, endocrine resistance develops in nearly all patients and the optimal systemic therapy after progression on a CDK 4/6 inhibitor is unknown.
Lasofoxifene is a third generation SERM previously investigated for the treatment of osteoporosis and vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA). In a large phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy of lasofoxifene for the postmenopausal treatment of osteoporosis, lasofoxifene significantly reduced the incidence of ER+ breast cancer. Further unpublished preclinical data have demonstrated significant in vitro and in vivo efficacy in non-clinical breast cancer models including models with and without ESR1 mutants. Moreover, lasofoxifene significantly reduced metastases in ESR1 mutated models. These non-clinical and clinical data provide a strong rationale to pursue a phase 2 clinical trial in women with ER+, ESR1 mutated MBC.
This open-label, multi-center study will compare the efficacy and tolerability of lasofoxifene (5 mg orally daily) to fulvestrant (IM 500 mg D1,15,29 and then q30 D) in a 1:1 randomization. Inclusion criteria include postmenopausal women with ER+ advanced breast cancer; progression on a non-steroidal AI in combination with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor; and a known ESR1 mutation. Approximately 90 patients with measurable or evaluable disease (i.e. bone only) will be recruited to have at least 40 patients per treatment arm. The primary endpoint will be progression free survival (PFS) with secondary endpoints of objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DoR) and time to response (TTR). It is assumed that lasofoxifene will double the median PFS compared to fulvestrant in this ESR1 mutation patient population for a hazard ratio 0.5 and a power of 89% to reach a 1-sided p of <0.05.
The study will commence in 4Q2018 and will complete recruitment in 1 year. It is anticipated that 25-30 centers in the US will be participating.
Citation Format: Plourde PV, Schwartzberg LS, Greene GL, Portman DJ, Komm BS, Jenkins SN, Liu P-Y, Portman MD, Goetz MP. An open-label, randomized, multi-center phase 2 study evaluating the activity of lasofoxifene relative to fulvestrant for the treatment of postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic ER+/HER2 - breast cancer (MBC) with an ESR1 mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PV Plourde
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - LS Schwartzberg
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - GL Greene
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - DJ Portman
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - BS Komm
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - SN Jenkins
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - P-Y Liu
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - MD Portman
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - MP Goetz
- Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH; West Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; U. of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thompson KJ, Alaparthi T, Sinnwell JP, Carlson EE, Tang X, Bockol M, Vedell PT, Ingle JN, Suman V, Weinshilboum RM, Wang L, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Goetz MP. Abstract P1-03-04: Molecular subtyping of androgen receptor-positive patients using gene expression profiles. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-03-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and unsupervised clustering approaches using gene expression data have identified 3-6 distinct subtypes of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). A genomically and clinically distinct subtype of TNBC is referred to as LAR (Luminal Androgen Receptor). Tumors with this subtype typically express high levels of the AR and exhibit alterations within genes involved in the PI3K pathway (e.g. PIK3CA mutations). Prospective studies are underway using drugs that target the AR alone or in combination with PI3K and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Given the importance of accurately identifying this subtype, we sought to develop an online tool that uses submitted gene expression data to confidently characterize LAR samples by corroborating the classification with previously published clustering approaches.
Methods: We have investigated TNBC RNA-Seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer study (N=123 samples) by cluster analysis. Analysis of the average silhouette width in both biased and unbiased K-means clustering approaches demonstrated LAR and basal as two distinct and significant clusters. A shrunken centroid model of 426 differentially expressed genes, named as CABAL (Clustering Among BAsal and Luminal androgen receptor), was constructed by comparing LAR and basal subtypes.
Results: We applied the CABAL model to classify the four TNBC microarray datasets that were previously used in clustering experiments as well as an independent RNA-Seq data cohort. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and fuzzy clustering were applied to the samples (N=1046). Clustering similarity among the methods was assessed with the adjusted rand index, and CABAL demonstrated significant similarity with both fuzzy and NMF clustering methods. Similarly, hierarchical clustering analysis performed on the pooled cohort of 1046 samples recapitulated the CABAL classification with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.91.
Conclusions: Confident and robust identification of samples with the LAR phenotype is paramount in the assessment of clinical associations and therapeutic efficacy. To facilitate LAR identification, we have provided a web-based prediction tool of the CABAL classification, integrated with the NMF and fuzzy clustering results to identify candidate LAR samples. The end user is provided with the pair-wise adjusted rand indexes, thus reinforcing in the clustering characterizations. Further, our online LAR depiction tool provides a set of graphical and tabular summaries, which will be illustrated, while providing additional molecular characterizations of the PAM50 and Metabric classifications. The availability of this tool could advance the genomic research and treatment of TNBC patients.
Citation Format: Thompson KJ, Alaparthi T, Sinnwell JP, Carlson EE, Tang X, Bockol M, Vedell PT, Ingle JN, Suman V, Weinshilboum RM, Wang L, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Goetz MP. Molecular subtyping of androgen receptor-positive patients using gene expression profiles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - X Tang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kalari KR, Sinnwell JP, Thompson KJ, Tang X, Carlson EE, Alaparthi T, Yu J, Vedell PT, Kalmbach MT, Bockol MA, Hossain A, Weinshilboum RM, Boughey JC, Wang L, Suman VJ, Goetz MP. Abstract P3-06-10: Multiscale modeling of omics data for precision breast cancer treatment. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-06-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The vast majority of cancer patients continue to receive treatments that are minimally informed by omics data. In the case of breast cancer, only ER and HER2 are routinely used for treatment selection. There is a particular need for personalized treatment in individuals with primary and secondary drug resistance or aggressive breast cancers. Emerging bioinformatics and statistical methods have made a fundamental impact on cancer research. However, challenges remains with regard to patient-centric data analysis and providing genomic data guidance to oncologists. There exists a large number of FDA approved anti-neoplastic drugs used to treat cancers other than breast and the development of innovative informatics methods and algorithms to repurpose those drugs should benefit breast cancer patients.
Methods and Results: We have developed precision care systems (such as PANOPLY and CORPUS) to identify personalized therapies for an individual patient and to deliver genomic reports in a standard, searchable format so that a researcher or an oncologist can quickly navigate through molecular data and obtain prioritized drugs and targets.The PANOPLY (Precision cancer genomics report: single sample inventory) algorithm applies machine learning and topology-based network analysis methods to integrate multi-omics profiles and clinical data; individual-specific molecular alterations are identified and compared with a set of matched-controls having similar clinical data. Since there is a lack of a “gold standard” dataset to test such algorithms, we simulated 500 case-control sets and evaluated drug predictions across multiple simulation scenarios. We applied the PANOPLY algorithm to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer cohort, which consists of multi-omics data and clinical data. In addition, PANOPLY was also applied to an in-house neoadjuvant breast cancer study (BEAUTY) that consists of multi-omics data, clinical data, and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). In the TCGA breast cancer study we obtained survival data to determine the cases and matched-controls; and in the BEAUTY, we used pathologic complete response (pCR) as an outcome to determine responders and non-responders. Recurrent targetable alterations were not enriched in patients without pCR in the BEAUTY study. We have applied the PANOPLY to non-responder patients to identify individual specific alterations, dysregulated networks, drug targets, and drugs for each patient and stored them as case reports in CORPUS (Computational Oncology Reports and Precision therapeUticS), a web-based repository that allows clinicians to review genomic reports. Using comprehensive “omic” data derived from a triple negative breast cancer patient who had pre and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy PDXs, PANOPLY prioritized the PARP inhibitors as the top class of drug. Using the PDX models available from this patient, we tested olaparib and confirmed the in vivo antitumor activity (more effective than vehicle with a p-value < 0.05 in the PDXs). Further studies to confirm PANOPLY findings are currently underway.
Conclusions: In summary, the PANOPLY and CORPUS systems incorporate molecular data together with clinical data to provide genomic reports with proposed drug targets to advance or enable precision breast cancer care.
Citation Format: Kalari KR, Sinnwell JP, Thompson KJ, Tang X, Carlson EE, Alaparthi T, Yu J, Vedell PT, Kalmbach MT, Bockol MA, Hossain A, Weinshilboum RM, Boughey JC, Wang L, Suman VJ, Goetz MP. Multiscale modeling of omics data for precision breast cancer treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - X Tang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - J Yu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goldfarb SB, Goetz MP, Plourde PP, Attias E, Portman DJ. Abstract P5-11-11: A preliminary assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and awareness surrounding ESR1 mutations and biomarker testing amongst medical oncologists. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-11-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) mutations present in breast cancer patients are associated with resistance to endocrine therapy and worse patient outcomes. Recent findings suggest ESR1 mutations are present in up to 40% of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients' tumors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perceptions of precision medicine and biomarker testing specific to ESR1 mutations among medical oncologists.
Methods: Ten 60-minute web-assisted, telephone interviews were conducted with medical oncologists. Each physician was prescreened prior to being interviewed to ensure board certification and practice experience between 2 and 35 years. Each participant spent greater than 30% of their time on direct patient care and managed the treatment of more than 30 different cancer patients per month, with a minimum of 15 breast cancer patients, including at least five who had metastatic breast cancer and at least one patient with an ESR1 mutation.
Results: A 10-20% prevalence of ESR1 mutation was estimated by the oncologists. However, the practitioners did accept the possibility of a 40% prevalence. Physician knowledge of ESR1 mutations included the relationship between ESR1 mutations and efficacy of endocrine therapies and its association with poorer outcomes. None of the medical oncologists interviewed were highly satisfied with the existing armamentarium of treatments for patients with an ESR1 mutation.
In general, the interview participants were highly comfortable ordering ESR1 companion diagnostics to test for an ESR1 mutation, pending viable treatment options are available. Nonetheless, most physicians will wait until the patient has progression of disease before ordering a biomarker test. Several areas of unmet need in the mBC arena were offered by the survey participants, including more efficacious hormonal options for later-line therapies, better durability of remission, improved drug tolerability profiles, and lower treatment costs.
Conclusion: Most oncologists acknowledged that personalized treatment is beneficial because it allows for better efficacy than a “one size fits all” approach. The study results also suggest that there are few barriers and drawbacks to the use of personalized medicine in the mBC arena, as most physicians expect precision medicine to account for the majority of advances in breast cancer treatments in the foreseeable future.
Support: Sermonix Pharmaceuticals
Citation Format: Goldfarb SB, Goetz MP, Plourde PP, Attias E, Portman DJ. A preliminary assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and awareness surrounding ESR1 mutations and biomarker testing amongst medical oncologists [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SB Goldfarb
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH
| | - MP Goetz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH
| | - PP Plourde
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH
| | - E Attias
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH
| | - DJ Portman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jones CJ, Goetz MP, Ingle JN, Hawse JR. Abstract P5-04-05: Glucocorticoid receptor activation inhibits proliferation of endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells and resensitizes cells to hormonal therapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-04-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Despite the prevalent treatment options for ERα-positive breast cancer patients, and their initial efficacy for many women, ERα-positive disease still accounts for more breast cancer related deaths than any other subtype. Relapse in these patients is largely due to the development of resistance to anti-estrogen therapies such as tamoxifen. While tamoxifen and its resistance mechanisms have been extensively studied from both the bench and the bedside, relatively little is known about its active metabolite endoxifen. Our group has provided evidence that endoxifen is the most potent and clinically relevant metabolite of tamoxifen, suggesting that its characterization may be crucial to understanding tamoxifen resistance.
Methods: We have developed novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 and T47D cell lines through chronic exposure to endoxifen during a period of 12-24 months. Using these models and their respective controls, we compared global gene expression profiles of endoxifen resistant cells to tamoxifen resistant cells and found marked differences between the two models. Additionally, we subjected treatment naïve cells to a genome-wide, CRISPR-mediated knockout screen to identify genes, and their associated pathways, that are likely involved in mediating endoxifen resistance.
Results: Analysis of CRISPR guide RNAs enriched or depleted in response to chronic endoxifen treatment revealed that disruption of genes regulated by dexamethasone (Dex), a potent glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist, enhanced cells' ability to survive and proliferate in the presence of endoxifen. These data suggest that GR activation may inhibit endoxifen resistance, and that treatment of resistant cells with Dex may restore endoxifen efficacy. Indeed, Dex treatment significantly inhibited the proliferation rates of endoxifen resistant cells by 50-60% with little to no inhibitory effects in endoxifen sensitive models. Further, Dex was shown to synergize with endoxifen in resistant cells to further suppress cell proliferation, implying that Dex treatment could be utilized as an effective therapy for endocrine resistant disease. Conditioned media harvested from cells chronically exposed to Dex also resulted in substantial inhibition of endoxifen resistant cell proliferation rates. To explore potential mechanisms of these effects, we performed RNA-seq on both treatment-naïve and endoxifen resistant cells following Dex treatment. Out of 246 genes significantly regulated by Dex in endoxifen resistant cells, we identified 61 genes that were not differentially regulated in treatment naïve cells. These genes may provide insights into the mechanisms of GR activity specific to endoxifen resistant cells.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, we have developed the first models of endoxifen resistance and have demonstrated that global transcriptomic changes that occur during this process are substantially different than those observed in tamoxifen resistant models. We have shown that activation of GR signaling elicits significant growth-inhibitory effects specifically in the setting of endoxifen resistance. These data identify the GR pathway as a potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of endocrine resistant breast cancer.
Citation Format: Jones CJ, Goetz MP, Ingle JN, Hawse JR. Glucocorticoid receptor activation inhibits proliferation of endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells and resensitizes cells to hormonal therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-05.
Collapse
|
14
|
Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer CE, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge GW. Abstract GS4-07: Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs4-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Black race is associated with worse outcomes in localized hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer in population-based and in clinical trial cohorts, whether using self-identified race (Albain et al. JNCI 2009 [PMID: 19584328; Sparano et al. JNCI 2012 [PMID: 22250182) or genetically-identified race (Schneider et al. J Precision Oncol 2017 [PMID: 29333527]). This disparity persists after adjustment for treatment delivery parameters (Hershman et al. JCO 2009 [PMID:19307504]). We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment delivered and clinical outcomes in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) by race and ethnicity (Sparano et al. NEJM 2018 [PMID: 29860917]).
Methods: The analysis included 9719 evaluable TAILORx participants. The association between clinical outcomes and race (white, black, Asian, other/unknown) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) was examined, including invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), relapse-free interval (RFI), and overall survival (OS). Proportional hazards models were fit including age (5 categories), tumor size (>2 cm vs. <=2 cm), histologic grade (high vs. medium vs. low vs. unknown), continuous recurrence score (RS), race, and ethnicity in the overall population and randomized treatment arms in the RS 11-25 cohort.
Results: The study population included 8189 (84%) whites, 693 (7%) blacks, 405 (4%) Asians, and 432 (4%) with other/unknown race. Regarding ethnicity, 7635 (79%) were non-Hispanic, 889 (9%) Hispanic, and 1195 (12%) unknown. There was no significant difference in RS distribution (p=0.22) in blacks compared with whites, or in median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (19.1 vs. 18.2). There was likewise no difference in Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic ethnicity for RS distribution (p=0.72) or median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (18.5 vs. 18.0). Black race (39% vs. 30%) and Hispanic ethnicity (39% vs. 30%) were both associated with younger age (</=50 years) at diagnosis. The use and type of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and duration of endocrine therapy, were similar in black (vs. white) and Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) populations. In proportional hazards models, black race (compared with white race) was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the entire population and in those with a RS 11-25 (see table). Hispanic ethnicity was generally associated with better outcomes (compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity). For the cohort with a RS of 11-25, there was no evidence for chemotherapy benefit for any racial or ethnic group.
Race (black vs.white) and clinical outcomes in proportional hazards modelsClinical endpointEntire Population (N=693 black) Hazard ratio for eventRS 11-25 (N=471 black) Hazard ratio for eveniDFS1.33 (p=0.005)1.49 (p=0.001)DRFI1.21 (p=0.28)1.60 (p=0.02)RFI1.39 (p=0.02)1.80 (p<0.001)OS1.52 (p=0.005)1.67 (p=0.003
Conclusions: In patients eligible and selected for participation in TAILORx, black women had worse clinical outcomes despite similar 21-gene assay RS results and comparable systemic therapy. This adds to an emerging body of evidence suggesting a biologic basis or other factors contributing to racial disparities in HR-positive breast cancer that requires further evaluation.
Citation Format: Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer, Jr. CE, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson, Jr. JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge, Jr. GW. Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - RJ Gray
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - JA Sparano
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - DF Makower
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - KI Pritchard
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - DF Hayes
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - CE Geyer
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - EC Dees
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - MP Goetz
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - JA Olson
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - T Lively
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - SS Badve
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - TJ Saphner
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - LI Wagner
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - TJ Whelan
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - MJ Ellis
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - S Paik
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - WC Wood
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - PM Ravdin
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - MM Keane
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - HL Gomez
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - PS Reddy
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - TF Goggins
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - IA Mayer
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - AM Brufsky
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - DL Toppmeyer
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - VG Kaklamani
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - JL Berenberg
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - J Abrams
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| | - GW Sledge
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic, Two Rivers, WI; Wake Forest University Health Service, Winston Salem, NC; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; , San Antonio, TX; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; C
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haddox CL, Shenoy N, Shah KK, Kao JC, Jain S, Halfdanarson TR, Wijdicks EF, Goetz MP. Pembrolizumab induced bulbar myopathy and respiratory failure with necrotizing myositis of the diaphragm. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:673-675. [PMID: 27993808 PMCID: PMC5391710 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C L Haddox
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - N Shenoy
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - K K Shah
- Anatomic/Clinical Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J C Kao
- Neurology , Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - S Jain
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - T R Halfdanarson
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - E F Wijdicks
- Anatomic/Clinical Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M P Goetz
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pagani O, Regan MM, Fleming GF, Walley BA, Colleoni M, Láng I, Gomez HL, Tondini C, Burstein HJ, Goetz MP, Ciruelos EM, Stearns V, Debled M, Martino S, Geyer CE, Pinotti G, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Francis PA. Abstract GS4-02: Randomized comparison of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs tamoxifen (T) plus OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC): Update of the combined TEXT and SOFT trials. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-gs4-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The combined results of TEXT and SOFT, after 5.7 years median follow-up, found adjuvant E+OFS significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) vs T+OFS in premenopausal women with HR+ BC (Pagani et al, NEJM 2014). Follow-up was immature for overall survival (OS). We report a planned update with visit cut-off of 31Dec16 after 9 years median follow-up.
Methods: TEXT and SOFT enrolled premenopausal women with HR+ early BC from Nov 2003 to Apr 2011 (2660 TEXT, 3047 SOFT in the intention-to-treat populations). TEXT randomized women within 12wk of surgery to 5 yrs E+OFS vs T+OFS; chemotherapy (CT) was optional and concurrent with OFS. SOFT randomized women to 5 yrs E+OFS vs T+OFS vs T alone, within 12wk of surgery if no CT planned, or within 8mo of completing (neo)adjuvant CT after premenopausal status was (re-)established. OFS was by choice of 5yr GnRH agonist triptorelin, oophorectomy or ovarian irradiation. Both trials were stratified by CT use. The primary endpoint was DFS: randomization until invasive local, regional, distant recurrence or contralateral breast; invasive second malignancy; death. Secondary endpoints included invasive breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and OS. Stratified Cox models estimated hazard ratios; Kaplan-Meier method estimated 8yr endpoint rates. NCT00066703/NCT00066690.
Results: DFS for patients assigned E+OFS (n=2346) continued to be significantly improved over T+OFS (n=2344): 8yr DFS was 86.8% vs. 82.8%. The 8yr BCFI was improved by 4.1% (89.3% vs 85.2%) and 8yr DRFI by 2.1% (91.8% vs 89.7%). There was no difference in OS in patients assigned E+OFS vs T+OFS: 93.4% vs 93.3% OS at 8yrs. For 1996 women without CT there have been 45 deaths, with 98% OS at 8yrs with both treatments.
EndpointN. EventsHazard Ratio (95% CI) E+OFS vs T+OFSDFS7200.77 (0.67-0.90); P<0.001BCFI6000.74 (0.63-0.87)DRFI4330.80 (0.65-0.96)OS3200.98 (0.79-1.22)
Overall toxicity was not significantly worse with E+OFS than with T+OFS (32% vs 31% grade 3-4 targeted AEs). Hot flashes, musculoskeletal symptoms and hypertension were the most frequent targeted grade 3-4 AEs. Overall, 15% of patients stopped all protocol-assigned treatment early. Patients assigned E+OFS had increased risk of assigned oral endocrine therapy cessation (25% vs 19% for patients assigned T+OFS by 4yrs) but not of triptorelin cessation (18% vs 19% by 4yrs, respectively).
Conclusions: After 9 yrs median follow-up, adjuvant E+OFS, as compared with T+OFS, shows a sustained reduction of the risk of recurrence but did not improve overall survival. As in postmenopausal women, oncologists need to consider potential absolute benefits and properly select patients at sufficient risk for recurrence for whom E+OFS seems indicated. Follow-up continues, which will further clarify the effect of E+OFS for safety, late recurrence and overall survival.
Citation Format: Pagani O, Regan MM, Fleming GF, Walley BA, Colleoni M, Láng I, Gomez HL, Tondini C, Burstein HJ, Goetz MP, Ciruelos EM, Stearns V, Debled M, Martino S, Geyer Jr CE, Pinotti G, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Francis PA. Randomized comparison of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs tamoxifen (T) plus OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC): Update of the combined TEXT and SOFT trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pagani
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - MM Regan
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - GF Fleming
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - BA Walley
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - M Colleoni
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - I Láng
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - HL Gomez
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - C Tondini
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - HJ Burstein
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - MP Goetz
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - EM Ciruelos
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - V Stearns
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - M Debled
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - S Martino
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - CE Geyer
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - G Pinotti
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - AS Coates
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - A Goldhirsch
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - RD Gelber
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| | - PA Francis
- SOFT and TEXT Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Breast International Group and North American Breast Cancer Group
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Polley MY, Liu H, Gilbert J, Cafourek V, Hillman D, Negron V, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari K, Couch FJ, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Abstract P3-05-06: Prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and its relation to stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-05-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: While TNBC remains the most aggressive type of breast cancer (BC), substantial heterogeneity in biology and outcomes exists among TNBC subtypes. Historically, risk stratification of TNBC has been based on anatomic factors such as tumor size, nodal involvement and presence of distant metastases. However, these features alone fail to accurately predict outcomes. Tumor immune infiltration (sTILs) and distribution of immune cell subsets in the perip heral blood (NLR) have emerged as variables reported to be associated with outcomes in TNBC. We sought to evaluate whether NLR and sTILs provided independent prognostic information in TNBC.
Methods: From a cohort of 9,982 women who underwent BC surgery at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between Jan 1985 and Dec 2012, we identified 605 centrally-confirmed TNBC tumors. Patients (pts) with prior BC, bilateral BC, non-invasive disease, stage IV, neoadjuvant therapy, endocrine therapy, or adenoid cystic histology were excluded. For eligible tumors, clinical and pathologic variables were evaluated, including peripheral blood NLR and central assessment of sTILs per the 2014 International TILs Working Group recommendations. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between NLR and sTILs and constructed Cox Proportional Hazards Models to evaluate their association with invasive-disease free (IDFS) and overall survival (OS). NLR and sTILs were both analyzed as continuous variables.
Results: Most pts had T1-2 (95%) and N0-1 disease (86%). Median OS follow-up was 10.6yrs. Median IDFS was 12yrs (95%CI 10.2-16.7) and median OS was 18.8yrs (95%CI 15.6-20.8). NLR and sTILs were available in 408 and 599 pts, respectively. The median NLR and sTIL content were 2.29 (0.14-10.50) and 20% (0-90%), respectively. NLR and sTILs were poorly correlated (PCC 0.0237). On univariate analysis (UVA), a higher NLR was associated with worse IDFS (HR 1.13; 95%CI 1.02-1.26, p=0.02) and OS (HR 1.17; 95%CI 1.04-1.31, p=0.01). Each 1% increment in sTILs was associated with improved IDFS (HR 0.99; 95%CI 0.98-0.99, p<0.001) and OS (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.98-1.00, p<0.001). Among pts with high sTILs (≥20%), a higher NLR remained significantly associated with worse IDFS (HR 1.21; 95%CI 1.05-1.38, p=0.007) and OS (HR 1.25; 95%CI 1.09-1.44, p=0.001). In contrast, among pts with low sTILs (<20%), NLR was not associated with IDFS (HR 1.07; 95%CI 0.89-1.28, p=0.49) or OS (HR 1.07; 95%CI 0.88-1.30, p=0.49). The interaction test between NLR and sTILs did not reach statistical significance. A multivariate analysis (MVA; including age, menopausal status, histologic subtype, grade, tumor size, nodal stage, Ki-67, NLR, sTILs, adjuvant chemotherapy, type of surgery and adjuvant radiation) showed that sTILs remained independently associated with IDFS (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.97-1.0, p=0.019) and OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.0, p=0.044), whereas NLR did not.
Conclusions: A lower NLR and a higher sTIL content were each associated with improved IDFS and OS among pts with nonmetastatic TNBC on UVA. However, when evaluated on a MVA, only sTILs remained independently associated with IDFS and OS. Our data suggest that the effect of sTILs on outcomes may not be modified by the NLR.
Citation Format: Leon-Ferre RA, Polley M-Y, Liu H, Gilbert J, Cafourek V, Hillman D, Negron V, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari K, Couch FJ, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and its relation to stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - H Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - MC Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cairns J, Ingle JN, Shepherd LE, Kubo M, Goetz MP, Weinshilboum RM, Kalari KR, Wang L. Abstract P5-07-01: LncRNA MIR2052HG regulates ERα level and endocrine resistance through LMTK3 by recruiting early growth response protein 1. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-07-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A GWAS for the MA.27 aromatase inhibitors (AIs) adjuvant trial (4,406 controls and 252 cases) identified variant (V) SNPs in a long noncoding (lnc) RNA, MIR2052HG, that were associated with longer breast cancer free interval (HR= 0.37, P= 2.15E-07). V SNPs (MAF= 0.32 to 0.42) were associated with lower MIR2052HG and ERα expression in the presence of AIs. MIR2052HG maintained ERα both by promoting AKT/FOXO3-mediated ESR1 transcription and by limiting ubiquitin-mediated ERα degradation. (Cancer Res 76:7012-23, 2016). Our goal was to further elucidate MIR2052HG's mechanism of action.
METHODS: RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation (RBPI) assays were performed to demonstrate that the transcription factor, early growth response protein 1 (EGR1), worked together with MIR2052HG to regulate lemur tyrosine kinase-3 (LMTK3) transcription in MCF7/AC1 and CAMA-1 cells. The location of EGR1 on the LMTK3 gene locus was mapped using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. The co-localization of MIR2052HG RNA and the LMTK3 gene locus was determined using RNA-DNA dual fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). SNP effects were evaluated using a panel of human lymphoblastoid cell lines.
RESULTS: TCGA analysis revealed LMTK3 and MIR2052HG expression were highly correlated in ERα-positive breast cancer patients. We found that the MIR2052HG transcript was located in the LMTK3 gene locus by RNA-DNA FISH. Among all of the 12 potential LMTK3 transcription factors identified in the Encode database that were examined by RBPI, only EGR1 showed an interaction with MIR2052HG. CHIP assays confirmed EGR1 binding to the two putative EGR1 binding sites in LMTK3 gene.Depletion of MIR2052HG reduced the binding of EGR1 to the LMTK3 promoter and decreased LMTK3 expression, suggesting that it might function as a scaffold. Mechanistically, decreased LMTK3 levels further increased protein kinase C (PKC) activity and downstream AKT activity, leading to reduced ESR1 mRNA levels via increased pFOXO3. At the protein level, in MIR2052HG depleted cells, increased PKC activity increased the phosphorylation of MEK, ERK, and RSK1, leading to increased ERα phosphorylation at Ser167 and increased ERα degradation. Conversely, overexpression of LMTK3 in MIR2052HG depleted cells reversed these phenotypes. MIR2052HG regulated LMTK3 and ERα expression in a SNP- dependent fashion: the MIR2052HG V SNP, relative to wild-type (WT) genotype, increased LMTK3/ERα expression in response to androstenedione due to increased binding between EGR1 and the LMTK3 promoter in LCLs. However, AI treatment reduced this binding in MIR2052HG variant cells but increased binding in WT cells, resulting in decreased LMTK3/ERα in V cells and increased expression in WT cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a model in which the protective MIR2052HG variant genotype regulates LMTK3 via MIR2052HG/EGR1, and LMTK3 regulates ERα stability via the PKC/MEK/ERK/RSK1 axis. This regulation may explain the effect of the MIR2052HG variant genotype on cell proliferation and response to AIs in MA.27. These findings provide new insight into the mechanism of action of MIR2052HG and suggest that LMTK3 may be a new therapeutic target in ERα-positive breast cancer patients treated with AIs.
Citation Format: Cairns J, Ingle JN, Shepherd LE, Kubo M, Goetz MP, Weinshilboum RM, Kalari KR, Wang L. LncRNA MIR2052HG regulates ERα level and endocrine resistance through LMTK3 by recruiting early growth response protein 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cairns
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - LE Shepherd
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - M Kubo
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - RM Weinshilboum
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - KR Kalari
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; Riken Center for Integrative Medical Science, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Polley MYC, Leon-Ferre RA, Liu H, Gilbert J, Cafourek V, Hillman DW, Negron V, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari K, Couch F, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Abstract P1-06-07: Mayo clinic TNBC outcome calculator: A clinical calculator to predict disease relapse and survival in women with triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-06-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with substantial risks of disease recurrence. While cytotoxic chemotherapy is commonly administered and reduces recurrence, disease outcomes vary considerably and few prognostic tools are available for risk stratification for TNBC patients. We constructed and validated clinical calculators for invasive-disease free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) for TNBC and compared their performance against AJCC-based models which include only tumor size and nodal status.
Methods: From a surgical cohort of 9,982 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at Mayo Clinic between January 1985 and December 2012, 605 centrally reviewed TNBC patients were identified and used to construct Cox models for IDFS and OS. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Variables considered included age, menopausal status, tumor size, nodal status, Nottingham grade, type of breast surgery (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy), adjuvant radiation therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, Ki67, stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Missing values were imputed using single imputation with all variables (including outcomes) included in the imputation model. Backward step-down procedure was used for model selections. The final models were internally validated for calibration and discrimination using bootstrapping methods and compared with AJCC-based models.
Results: For both IDFS and OS, higher sTIL's, less extensive nodal involvement, use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and lower NLR were significant predictors of improved clinical outcomes. Premenopausal status and younger age were additionally predictive of improved IDFS and OS, respectively. Models for IDFS and OS have good calibration and are associated with bias-corrected C-indices of 0.68 and 0.71, respectively, as compared with C-indices of 0.59 and 0.62 for AJCC-based models.
Conclusions: Our data indicate that a clinical calculator that includes sTIL's, NLR, menopausal status, age, nodal involvement as well as chemotherapy use can provide significantly greater prediction of clinical risk than tumor size and nodal status alone. These tools may be used to identify TNBC patients at elevated risk of disease relapse and to aid physician's communication with patients regarding their long-term disease outlook and planning treatment strategies. External validation is required to further evaluate broader applicability of this tool, which was developed utilizing a single-institutional experience.
Citation Format: Polley M-YC, Leon-Ferre RA, Liu H, Gilbert J, Cafourek V, Hillman DW, Negron V, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari K, Couch F, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Mayo clinic TNBC outcome calculator: A clinical calculator to predict disease relapse and survival in women with triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - H Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - MC Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reese JM, Bruinsma ES, Monroe DG, Goetz MP, Hawse JR. Abstract P5-04-04: Activation of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer results in cell cycle arrest. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p5-04-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which comprises approximately 20% of breast cancer diagnoses, lacks estrogen receptor alpha, progesterone receptor and Her-2 expression. However, we have identified that 30% of TNBC patients express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), a nuclear hormone receptor and potential therapeutic target. Here we examine the effects of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer cell lines.
Methods: Cell lines that stably express ERβ were used to perform microarray analyses following five days of estrogen treatment. Ingenuity pathway analysis was conducted on differentially expressed genes to determine alterations in biological pathways. The effects of ERβ on cell cycle progression and apoptosis was determined. Cell cycle-related expression changes were confirmed with RT-qPCR and western blotting. The impact of siRNA mediated gene silencing of CDK1 on TNBC cell proliferation was assessed as was the ability of ERβ to elicit anti-proliferative effects in the setting of CDK1 knockdown.
Results: We have shown that estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment causes decreased proliferation of ERβ+ TNBC cells. This inhibitory effect is not due to programmed cell death but rather a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest as indicated by flow cytometry experiments. Microarray data and ingenuity pathway analysis revealed a number of down regulated genes involved in cell-cycle progression. Specifically, estrogen treatment of ERβ positive TNBC cells was shown to result in suppression of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and Cyclin B, effects that were confirmed following ERβ-specific agonist treatment at both the mRNA and protein levels via RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively. Knockdown of CDK1 in ERβ+ TNBC cells using siRNA resulted in decreased proliferation and diminished the anti-proliferative effects observed following estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment.
Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists cause cell cycle arrest in ERβ positive TNBC. These effects are due to ERβ-mediated suppression of multiple genes involved in cell cycle progression including CDK1 and Cyclin B. Following knockdown of CDK1, estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment displayed minimal impact on cell proliferation. Therefore, ERβ's effects on proliferation may primarily be mediated by blockade of CDK1 and Cyclin B. Regardless of ERβ, our data suggest that inhibition of CDK1 activity may have therapeutic benefit in a subset of TNBC patients, an area of study that has yet to be explored.
Citation Format: Reese JM, Bruinsma ES, Monroe DG, Goetz MP, Hawse JR. Activation of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer results in cell cycle arrest [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JM Reese
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - ES Bruinsma
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - DG Monroe
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - MP Goetz
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - JR Hawse
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Abstract P1-08-03: Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-08-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The primary mechanism by which tamoxifen (Tam) and its metabolites exert their biologic effects is through estrogen receptor (ER) binding and inhibition of ER signaling. We and others demonstrated that endoxifen (Endx) has greater antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared to Tam and the first-in-human Endx phase I study demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with prior progression on Tam (Goetz SABC 2015). PKCs are a family of serine/threonine-specific protein kinases that regulate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation. Our prior protein docking studies suggested endoxifen may be a substrate for PKCs. Here we report the effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 binding, kinase activity, as well as interactions between PKCβ1 and ERα.
Methods: Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR, Biacore T200, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate binding of Tam, N-desmethyl Tam (NDMT), 4-HT, and Endx to PKCβ1 and PKCβ2. The effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 kinase activity were determined. Proliferation and colony formation in MCF7 parental and PKCβ1 overexpressing cells were evaluated. siRNA silencing was used to knockdown PKCβ1 expression in the following cells: MCF7 aromatase expressing cells that were either sensitive (MCF7/AC1) or resistant to letrozole (MCF7/AC1 L-resistant); T47D; and MDA-MB-361. Coimmunoprecipitation assay and DUOlink in situ proximity ligation were used to investigate the interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα.
Results: Endx more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to Tam ( IC50 350 nM vs 47.8 μM ) with KDs for PKCβ1 binding as follows: Endx (100 nM ), Tam ( 2 μM ), 4-HT ( 2 μM ) and NDMT (> 7 μM ). None of the SERMs exhibited PKCβ2 binding. In the MCF7/AC1 and MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, PKCβ1 knockdown resulted in ERα degradation and potently inhibited cell proliferation. These results were confirmed in T47D and MDA-MB-361 cells. Notably, PKCβ1 knockdown in MCF7/AC1 cells resulted in significantly greater E2 induced proliferation comparing siRNA knockdown vs. control. To further explore these effects, we evaluated the effects of PKCβ1 overexpression in MCF7 cells and demonstrated that PKCβ1 overexpression reduced cell proliferation and colony formation compared to parental MCF-7 cells without affecting ERα protein stability. Coimmunoprecipitation assays in transient transfected MCF-7 cells with exogenous PKCβ1 as well as PKCβ1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells transiently or stably transfected with ERα demonstrated PKCβ1 and ERα interaction, with confirmation by Duolink assay that this interaction occurs in the cytoplasm.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that endoxifen binds and inhibits PKCβ1 at relevant concentrations achieved in the endoxifen clinical trial studies. PKCβ1 interacts with cytoplasmic ERα and PKCβ1 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and enhances ERα turnover. However, in PKCβ1 overexpressing cells, PKCβ1 may exhibit tumor suppressive effects. These data suggest a complex interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα and that endoxifen's effects on PKCβ1 may alter drug response of endocrine therapy. Further studies are ongoing to characterize the role of PKCβ1 and its role in ER biology and response to endoxifen.
Citation Format: Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Guo
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - MJ Kuffel
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - RA Kudgus
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - Z Huang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - AM Bode
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - J Cheng
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - JM Reid
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - ES Bruinsma
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - M Subramaniam
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - MM Ames
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - JR Hawse
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reese JM, Bruinsma ES, Suman VJ, Nelson AW, Chernukhin I, Carroll JS, Ingle JN, Goetz MP, Hawse JR. Abstract P3-07-20: Biological functions of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer and its utility as a novel therapeutic drug target. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-07-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses. It is the most aggressive form of breast cancer and clinical management is problematic due to lack of available targeted therapies. We have shown that approximately 30% of all TNBCs express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), a ligand binding transcription factor, and a potential drug target for patients with this form of the disease.
Methods: Using novel ERβ-expressing TN cell lines developed in our laboratory, we assessed the impacts of ERβ on proliferation, invasion, migration, and alterations in cell cycle progression following estrogen and ERβ-specific agonist treatment. We also characterized the ERβ transcriptome and cistrome in these models through microarray and ChIP-Seq, respectively. Finally, we determined the tumoral response of cell line xenografts and PDXs treated with 17β-estradiol.
Results: We found that both estrogen and multiple ERβ-specific agonists elicit significant anti-tumor effects in ERβ+ TNBC cell lines and tumor xenografts. Activation of ERβ with estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation primarily through a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. Substantial reductions in cell migration and invasion were also observed following treatment. Microarray studies revealed that ERβ differentially regulated the expression of approximately 1000 genes following estrogen treatment. Of these genes, the most striking effects were observed in a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors known as cystatins, which were highly induced following ERβ activation. ChIP-Seq and ChIP-PCR identified ERβ binding sites in the promoter region of each cystatin and demonstrated ERβ-mediated alterations in chromatin marks and recruitment of PolII around these promoters. We found that cystatins directly interact with TGFβ receptor 2 (TGFβR2) and block downstream TGFβ ligand-mediated activation of the canonical signaling pathway. Depletion of cystatins from conditioned media or through siRNA-mediated silencing reduced the ability of ERβ to elicit these anti-tumor effects. In vivo, estrogen treatment of mice harboring ERβ+ TNBC cell line xenografts or PDXs resulted in increased tumoral expression and serum levels of cystatins, and suppressed tumor growth.
Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists elicit anti-cancer effects in ERβ+ TNBC, both in vitro and in vivo. These effects are partially mediated by cystatins which can interact with, and inhibit, canonical TGFβ signaling, a pathway known to drive TNBC progression. Given the lack of targeted therapies for TNBC patients, the present data suggests that estrogen or ERβ-specific agonists offer a novel approach to manage this subset of patients.
Citation Format: Reese JM, Bruinsma ES, Suman VJ, Nelson AW, Chernukhin I, Carroll JS, Ingle JN, Goetz MP, Hawse JR. Biological functions of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer and its utility as a novel therapeutic drug target [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JM Reese
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - ES Bruinsma
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - VJ Suman
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - AW Nelson
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - I Chernukhin
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - JS Carroll
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - JN Ingle
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - MP Goetz
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - JR Hawse
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rochester, MN; Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Rochester, MN; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Oncology, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Moyer AM, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, McLaughlin SA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Sinnwell JP, Carlson EE, Dockter TJ, Jones KN, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Wieben ED, Ingle JN, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Abstract P4-04-05: Differential mRNA expression patterns in breast tumors with high vs. low quantity of stromal tumor–Infiltrating lymphocytes. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-04-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have prognostic and potentially predictive significance in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer. However, quantitative TIL measurement is not routinely performed. It is unclear why some tumors attract large quantities of TIL while others do not. We sought to confirm the association between TIL and pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and to further use next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify genes and gene pathways associated with the presence/absence of TIL.
Methods: We studied 140 women with high risk stage I-III breast cancer, enrolled in the Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY), obtaining serial biopsies for DNA/RNA sequencing and MRI imaging to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with taxane (+/- trastuzumab+/-pertuzumab for HER2+ disease) followed by AC or (F)EC. Diagnostic pre-NAC core needle biopsies and surgical resection specimens post-NAC were available from 110 patients. Stromal TIL were semi-quantitated on a scale of 1-4 (with 1: ≤10/hpf, 2: subtle infiltrate >10/hpf, 3: moderate infiltrate readily visible at low power magnification, 4: dense infiltrate with innumerable lymphocytes). For this analysis, low TIL was defined as scores of 1-2 vs. high defined as 3-4. Using pre-NAC biopsies, RNAseq was performed using the Illumina HiSeq2000 and the Mayo Analysis Pipeline for RNAseq (MAP-Rseq) for quality control, sequence alignment, and gene counts. The quantity of TIL was associated with transcripts across the transcriptome after conditional quantile normalization. Differentially expressed genes were obtained using EdgeR analysis, using a false discovery rate of 0.05, and pathways were evaluated using GAGE methods.
Results: The pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/I rates by stromal TIL status within each molecular subtype are presented in the table. A diverse spectrum of 1344 genes with differential expression between tumors with high vs. low stromal TIL was identified. The genes with >2.0-fold change (FC) and p<1e-09 included S100A7 (4.49 FC), LCN2 (2.48 FC), and ART3 (2.82 FC) (genes known to be involved in immune regulation), as well as TDRD1 (2.71 FC) (a gene related to ERG [ETS-related gene] expression). In addition, the "regulation of actin cytoskeleton" pathway was upregulated in tumors with high TIL, while the "Hedgehog signaling" and "Wnt signaling" pathways were downregulated.
Molecular SubtypeStromal TILspCR rate n (%)RCB-0/I rateLuminal AHigh------Luminal ALow0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)Luminal BHigh1/9 (11.1%)1/8 (12.5%)Luminal BLow3/24 (12.5%)6/23 (26.1%)ER+/HER2+High3/9 (33.3%)4/9 (44.4%)ER+/HER2+Low1/6 (16.7%)1/6 (16.7%)ER-/HER2+High8/9 (88.9%)7/7 (100%)ER-/HER2+Low4/8 (50.0%)6/8 (75.0%)Triple NegativeHigh10/19 (52.6%)13/19 (68.4%)Triple NegativeLow7/14 (50.0%)9/13 (69.2%)
Conclusions: We identified genes and gene pathways associated with high TIL expression in breast tumors prior to NAC that provide insight into the interactions between TIL and tumors. TIL can be easily semi-quantitated on H&E and along with these novel biomarkers, may contribute to the personalization of breast cancer therapy.
Citation Format: Moyer AM, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, McLaughlin SA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Sinnwell JP, Carlson EE, Dockter TJ, Jones KN, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Wieben ED, Ingle JN, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Visscher DW, Goetz MP. Differential mRNA expression patterns in breast tumors with high vs. low quantity of stromal tumor–Infiltrating lymphocytes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AM Moyer
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JC Boughey
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KR Kalari
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SA McLaughlin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - A Moreno-Aspitia
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Northfelt
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - RJ Gray
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JP Sinnwell
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - EE Carlson
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - TJ Dockter
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KN Jones
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SJ Felten
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - AL Conners
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - ED Wieben
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - RM Weinshilboum
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Visscher
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, McLaughlin SA, Moreno Aspitia A, Moyer AM, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Vedell PT, Tang X, Dockter TJ, Jones KN, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Hart SN, Visscher DW, Wieben ED, Ingle JN, Hartman AR, Timms K, Elkin E, Jones J, Wang L, Weinshilboum RW, Goetz MP. Abstract P3-07-29: Role of germline BRCA status and tumor homologous recombination (HR) deficiency in response to neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p3-07-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Both HR deficiency and BRCA mutation status predict response to platinum-based therapy and BRCA mutation status predicts docetaxel resistance. However, the association of either biomarker with response to the individual elements of either AC or taxanes (T) is unknown since T is commonly given concomitantly with or after anthracyclines (A). We evaluated the association of HRD and BRCA mutation status with response to neoadjuvant weekly T followed by AC or (F)EC in high-risk breast cancer.
Methods: We studied 140 high risk Stage I-III breast cancer patients (pts), enrolled in the breast cancer genome guided therapy study (BEAUTY), obtaining biopsies for DNA/RNA sequencing and MRI imaging to assess response to neoadjuvant weekly T (+trastuzumab+/-pertuzumab for HER2+ disease) followed by AC or (F)EC. Germline BRCA status and HR status of tumor samples (Myriad laboratories) were obtained. HR deficient tumor was defined as HRD score ≥42 or BRCA mutation. MRI response by changes in tumor size after 12 weeks of T was classified by WHO criteria. pCR was defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0. Both MRI response after T and pCR (after T and AC) were examined in terms of germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAmut vs. gBRCAwt) and tumor HR deficiency.
Results: Of 140 pts enrolled, 8 withdrew consent and 2 carboplatin treated pts were excluded. Germline data were available for 124/130 pts. 12 patients had BRCA deleterious germline mutations (4 BRCA1, 8 BRCA2). MRI partial (PR)/complete response (CR) rate to T was 47.3% (95% CI: 37.8-57.0%) in the BRCAwt group and 66.7% (95% CI: 34.9-90.1%) in the BRCAmut group. No MRI CR's were observed in BRCA1 mut pts. In contrast, pCR rate was 50% in the 12 gBRCAmut pts (95% CI: 21.1-78.9%) and 31.3% in the 112 gBRCAwt pts (95% CI: 22.8-40.7%). HR deficiency status has thus far been determined for 74 pts: 26 pts have HD deficient tumors: 18 TNBC, 5 Luminal B, 2 ER-/HER2+; and 1 ER+/HER2+. Determination of HR deficiency is ongoing and will be reported for the full cohort in terms of 12 week MRI response to T and pCR to T+AC.
HR deficientMolecular Subtypeyes (%)no (%)TBD (%)Luminal A0/112/11 (18.2)9/11 (81.8)Luminal B5/37 (13.5)13/37 (35.1)19/37 (51.3)Luminal NOS0/21/2 (50)1/2 (50)ER+/Her2+1/17 (5.8)14/17 (82.4)2/17 (11.8)ER-/Her2+2/20 (10)11/20 (55)7/20 (35)Triple Negative18/43 (41.9)6/43 (18.6)17/43 (39.5)germline BRCA statusMRI partial response after T (%)MRI complete response after T (%)pCR after T&AC (%)BRCA11/4 (25)0/42/4 (50)BRCA25/8 (62.5)2/8 (25)4/8 (50)BRCAwt35/112 (31.3)18/112 (16.1)35/112 (31.3)
Conclusion: In the setting of neoadjuvant weekly T followed by AC, pCR rates were non-significantly higher in pts with BRCA1 mutations. While we observed no overall association between BRCA mutation status and response rates to taxanes; nearly all MRI responses to taxanes (partial and complete) were observed in the BRCA2 group. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and to determine whether BRCA status can be used to select therapy. HR deficiency is uncommon in luminal A and HER2+, frequent in TNBC, and the association of HRD with both MRI response to taxanes and pCR will be reported at the meeting.
Citation Format: Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, McLaughlin SA, Moreno Aspitia A, Moyer AM, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Vedell PT, Tang X, Dockter TJ, Jones KN, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Hart SN, Visscher DW, Wieben ED, Ingle JN, Hartman A-R, Timms K, Elkin E, Jones J, Wang L, Weinshilboum RW, Goetz MP. Role of germline BRCA status and tumor homologous recombination (HR) deficiency in response to neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-29.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JC Boughey
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - KR Kalari
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - SA McLaughlin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - A Moreno Aspitia
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - AM Moyer
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - DW Northfelt
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - RJ Gray
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - PT Vedell
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - X Tang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - TJ Dockter
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - KN Jones
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - SJ Felten
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - AL Conners
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - SN Hart
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - DW Visscher
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - ED Wieben
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - A-R Hartman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - K Timms
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - E Elkin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - J Jones
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - RW Weinshilboum
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AR; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yu J, Qin B, Boughey JC, Moyer AM, Visscher DW, Sinnwell JP, Yin P, Thompson KJ, Docter TJ, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, Wieben ED, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Jones KN, McLaughlin SA, Copland JA III, Moreno Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Ingle JN, Lou Z, Weinshilboum R, Goetz MP, Wang L. Abstract P3-07-51: Regulation of DNA methyltransferases via TRAF6 determines breast cancer response to decitabine. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p3-07-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tumorigenesis involves both genetic and epigenetic changes. Epigenetic alterations are reversible and are promising cancer therapeutic targets. Decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine), a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, is FDA approved for hematological malignancies. However, the effect of decitabine in breast cancer is not completely understood. Previous reports indicated that one decitabine mechanism involves regulation of protein levels for DNMT1, the major DNA methyltransferase that methylates hemimethylated CpG di-nucleotides in DNA. However, the E3 ligase involved in this process has not been identified. Whether decitabine also regulates DNMT3A and 3B in a similar fashion remains unclear. Therefore, our goals were to 1) understand mechanisms underlying decitabine action, 2) test the antitumor activity of decitabine in breast cancer models and 3) identify biomarkers associated with response to decitabine.
Methods and Results: Western blots of breast cancer cell lines showed that DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B protein levels decreased following decitabine treatment without a reduction in mRNA levels. Bioinformatic analysis of DNA methyltransferase sequences revealed a potential TRAF6 binding motif, and the interaction with TRAF6 (TNF receptor-associated factor 6) was confirmed by IP. TRAF6 functions as an E3 ligase. To determine whether TRAF6 might be the E3 ligase responsible for the degradation of DNMTs after decitabine treatment, we knocked down TRAF6 by RNA interference or knocked out the TRAF6 gene by CRISPR/Cas9. Down regulation of TRAF6 attenuated DNMT ubiquitination and increased DNMT protein levels, suggesting that TRAF6 might mediate proteasome-dependent degradation of all three DNMTs. This was further confirmed by reconstituting the knockout cells with WT and a TRAF6-C70A mutant, followed by assessing DNMT protein levels. Global DNA methylation was also increased after TRAF6 depletion and was confirmed in TRAF6 knock out cells in which DNMT levels were unaffected by decitabine. Cell cytotoxicity and colony forming assays showed that TRAF6 knockout cells were resistant to decitabine, suggesting that a major decitabine mechanism of action is through the regulation of TRAF6 which, in turn, degrades DNMTs, leading to decreased global methylation. Finally, decitabine significantly induced TRAF6 at both mRNA and protein levels, a process that might create positive feedback leading to increased degradation of DNMT proteins upon decitabine treatment. Based on these results, we further hypothesized that levels of the three DNMTs might influence decitabine response. Using 18 breast cancer patient derived xenograft (PDX) models, we found a wide range of DNMT protein levels regardless of ER/HER2 status. DNMT levels in the PDX models were directly associated with sensitivity to decitabine treatment, confirming our hypothesis.
Conclusion: Our data showed that decitabine might be an effective agent for treating breast cancer and revealed a novel mechanism underlying decitabine treatment. Baseline DNMT protein levels may serve as a biomarker for predicting decitabine drug response.
Citation Format: Yu J, Qin B, Boughey JC, Moyer AM, Visscher DW, Sinnwell JP, Yin P, Thompson KJ, Docter TJ, Kalari KR, Suman VJ, Wieben ED, Felten SJ, Conners AL, Jones KN, McLaughlin SA, Copland JA III, Moreno Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Ingle JN, Lou Z, Weinshilboum R, Goetz MP, Wang L. Regulation of DNA methyltransferases via TRAF6 determines breast cancer response to decitabine. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-51.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Yu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - B Qin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JC Boughey
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - AM Moyer
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Visscher
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JP Sinnwell
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - P Yin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KJ Thompson
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - TJ Docter
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KR Kalari
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - ED Wieben
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SJ Felten
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - AL Conners
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KN Jones
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SA McLaughlin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - III Copland JA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - A Moreno Aspitia
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Northfelt
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - RJ Gray
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Z Lou
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - R Weinshilboum
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Northfelt DW, Mahr MA, Dockter T, Kuffel M, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, McGovern RM, Collins JM, Streicher H, Hawse JR, Haddad TC, Erlichman C, Ames MM, Ingle JN. Abstract PD2-03: Final results of a first-in-human phase I study of the tamoxifen (TAM) metabolite, Z-Endoxifen hydrochloride (Z-Endx) in women with aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT01327781). Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-pd2-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: AI's are more effective than TAM in ER+ breast cancer. In AI refractory MBC, the response rate to TAM is 0% (Osborne 2011). Z-Endx is an active metabolite of TAM and among TAM treated women in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, reduced CYP2D6 metabolism and low Endx concentrations (Css <20 nM) have been associated with increased likelihood of disease recurrence. Preclinical studies have demonstrated greater Z-Endx exposure and anti-tumor activity with oral Z-Endx compared to equivalent doses of oral TAM (Reid 2014)
Methods: We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Z-Endx in patients (pts) with ER+, AI refractory MBC. Unlimited prior endocrine regimens were allowed. An accelerated titration schedule was applied (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, followed by a 3+3 design and then to expansion cohorts (40, 80, and 100 mg/day). Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, and end of cycles 2 and 6. PK was performed during cycle 1 and prior to subsequent cycles. For pts in the expansion cohorts, tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline for DNA sequencing (Foundation Medicine). Plasma cholesterol levels were obtained at baseline and after 1 cycle.
Results: From March 2011 to Dec 2014, 41 pts (38 evaluable), median age 60, received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (20-160 mg/daily). The median number of prior hormonal regimens was 2 and 3 for the dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Dose escalation was stopped at 160 mg/day given MTD not reached and attainment of mean Endx Css of 3.6 uM. Cycle 1 DLT (PE) was observed in one patient (60 mg). No eye toxicity was observed. PK demonstrated mean Endx Css of > 1 uM at all dose levels ≥ 40 mg/day. Antitumor activity was observed at multiple dose levels including 3 confirmed partial responses and an additional 7 with stable disease for ≥6 cycles. Of these 10 pts, 9 had prior progression on both AI and fulvestrant and 3 additionally on TAM. After 1 cycle, total and LDL cholesterol decreased > 20 points in 54% and 40% of pts, respectively. Tumor sequencing in the expansion cohorts (n=14) did not identify ESR1 mutations; however, ESR1 amplification was identified in 1 pt with prolonged stable disease (>200 days). Of 6 pts with rapid progression (≤2 cycles), 4/6 had either CCND1 amplification (n=1) or at least one of the following activating mutations: ERBB2 L755S (n=1), AKT1 E17K (n=1), MTOR E1799K (n=1).
Conclusions: The direct administration of Z-END provides substantial drug exposure, acceptable toxicity, and "proof of principle" antitumor activity in endocrine resistant MBC. While the MTD was not determined, the goal of achieving Endx Css concentrations of > 1 uM was achieved. Tumor sequencing identified pts with predicted and confirmed endocrine resistance. A randomized phase II comparing endoxifen (80 mg/day) with TAM in AI refractory MBC was recently activated (NCT02311933). Supported in part by CA 133049, CA186686, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083.
Citation Format: Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Northfelt DW, Mahr MA, Dockter T, Kuffel M, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, McGovern RM, Collins JM, Streicher H, Hawse JR, Haddad TC, Erlichman C, Ames MM, Ingle JN. Final results of a first-in-human phase I study of the tamoxifen (TAM) metabolite, Z-Endoxifen hydrochloride (Z-Endx) in women with aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT01327781). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JM Reid
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Northfelt
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - MA Mahr
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - T Dockter
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - M Kuffel
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SA Buhrow
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SL Safgren
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - RM McGovern
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JM Collins
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - H Streicher
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JR Hawse
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - TC Haddad
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C Erlichman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - MM Ames
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Haddad TC, D'Assoro AB, Suman VJ, Opyrchal M, Goetz MP, Ingle JN. Abstract P6-13-04: A phase I trial to evaluate the safety of the addition of alisertib to fulvestrant in hormone receptor positive (HR+), advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-13-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: During tumor progression, activation of Aurora A kinase (AURKA) is associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) reprogramming and expansion of a subpopulation of tumor initiating cells harboring a CD44+/CD24low/- phenotype [D'Assoro, Oncogene 2014]. These cells are characterized by their capacity to self-renew, resist drug therapies, and promote distant metastases. In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, activation of AURKA is associated with down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy. Alisertib, a selective inhibitor of AURKA, can reverse EMT and restore tumor ERα expression and sensitivity to endocrine therapy [Opyrchal, PLoS One 2014]. As a single agent in HR+ advanced BC, alisertib was associated with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 54% and median PFS of 7.9 months [Melichar, Lancet Oncol 2015]. The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and clinical activity of alisertib with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with HR+ advanced BC.
Methods: In this standard 3+3 dose-escalation phase I study, pts were assigned to two different oral doses of alisertib (40-50 mg BID on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28-day cycle) in combination with standard dose fulvestrant (500 mg IM on day 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then day 1 q 28-day cycle thereafter). Eligibility included HR+ advanced BC, postmenopausal status, measurable disease or nonmeasurable bone disease by RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, unlimited prior endocrine therapies, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting.
Results: Ten pts enrolled September 2014 - April 2015, and 9 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (one excluded due to ineligibility). The median pt age was 59 (range 48, 73). Prior endocrine therapies included AI (9, 100%), fulvestrant (6, 67%), and everolimus/exemestane (5, 56%). Eight pts (89%) had prior chemotherapy.
A median of 4 cycles of therapy have been administered (range 1+, 9+). There were no severe (grade 3+) toxicities reported during cycle 1 at either dose level, thus the MTD was not reached. The cycle 1 grade 1/2 adverse events regardless of attribution were fatigue (6, 67%), neutropenia (5, 56%), anemia (5, 56%), leukopenia (4, 44%), diarrhea (3, 33%), nausea (3, 33%), and mucositis (1, 11%). As of June 3, 2015, 2 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression, and 7 remain on treatment with stable disease (Table). One pt with bone only disease had a near CR on PET scan.
Dose LevelAlisertib Dose (BID)Treatment Cycles≥ Grade 3 Toxicity, All CyclesProgression-Free Survival (days)1 (n=3)40 mg4, 7+, 9+ 117, 170+, 223+2 (n=6)50 mg1+, 2, 3+, 3+, 4+, 5+grade 4 neutropenia (1 pt)28+, 56, 56+, 57+, 112+, 116++ indicates patients still receiving treatment
Conclusion: Alisertib in combination with fulvestrant was well-tolerated. The recommended phase II dose is 50 mg twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 q 28-day cycle with standard dose fulvestrant. Promising antitumor activity was observed. Correlative tissue evaluation of AURKA expression and other EMT biomarkers is underway.
Funding: This work was funded by Takeda Oncology and supported by NIH Grant K12 CA90628 [TCH].
Citation Format: Haddad TC, D'Assoro AB, Suman VJ, Opyrchal M, Goetz MP, Ingle JN. A phase I trial to evaluate the safety of the addition of alisertib to fulvestrant in hormone receptor positive (HR+), advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- TC Haddad
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - AB D'Assoro
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - M Opyrchal
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yoon HH, Foster NR, Meyers JP, Steen PD, Visscher DW, Pillai R, Prow DM, Reynolds CM, Marchello BT, Mowat RB, Mattar BI, Erlichman C, Goetz MP. Gene expression profiling identifies responsive patients with cancer of unknown primary treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and everolimus: NCCTG N0871 (alliance). Ann Oncol 2015; 27:339-44. [PMID: 26578722 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) are standard treatments for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, exhibits activity in diverse cancer types. We did a phase II trial combining everolimus with CP for CUP. We also evaluated whether a gene expression profiling (GEP) test that predicts tissue of origin (TOO) could identify responsive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A tumor biopsy was required for central confirmation of CUP and GEP. Patients with metastatic, untreated CUP received everolimus (30 mg weekly) with P (200 mg/m(2)) and C (area under the curve 6) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was response rate (RR), with 22% needed for success. The GEP test categorized patients into two groups: those having a TOO where CP is versus is not considered standard therapy. RESULTS Of 45 assessable patients, the RR was 36% (95% confidence interval 22% to 51%), which met criteria for success. Grade ≥3 toxicities were predominantly hematologic (80%). Adequate tissue for GEP was available in 38 patients and predicted 10 different TOOs. Patients with a TOO where platinum/taxane is a standard (n = 19) tended to have higher RR (53% versus 26%) and significantly longer PFS (6.4 versus 3.5 months) and OS (17.8 versus 8.3 months, P = 0.005), compared with patients (n = 19) with a TOO where platinum/taxane is not standard. CONCLUSIONS Everolimus combined with CP demonstrated promising antitumor activity and an acceptable side-effect profile. A tumor biomarker identifying TOO may be useful to select CUP patients for specific antitumor regimens. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT00936702.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N R Foster
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - J P Meyers
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - P D Steen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meritcare Hospital CCOP, Fargo
| | - D W Visscher
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - R Pillai
- Pathwork Diagnostics, Redwood City
| | - D M Prow
- Department of Medical Oncology, Iowa Oncology Research Association CCOP, Des Moines
| | - C M Reynolds
- Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, Ann Arbor
| | - B T Marchello
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings
| | - R B Mowat
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program CCOP, Toledo
| | - B I Mattar
- Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Goetz MP, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Eckel-Passow J, Suman VJ, Sicotte H, Hart SN, Moyer AM, Visscher DW, Yu J, Gao B, Sinnwell JP, Mahoney DW, Barman P, Vedell P, Tang X, Thompson K, Dockter TJ, Jones KN, Conners AL, McLaughlin SA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ, Wieben ED, Farrugia G, Schultz C, Ingle JN, Wang L, Weinshilboum RW. Abstract P1-08-10: Integration of next generation sequencing (NGS) and patient derived xenografts (PDX) to identify novel markers of paclitaxel (T) response in the breast cancer genome guided therapy study (BEAUTY). Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p1-08-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Based upon the association between pathologic response and disease free survival, the neoadjuvant setting is increasingly being used for drug development. NGS has identified unique and recurrent genetic alterations in breast cancer (BC) that are potentially targetable; however, the clinical implications are mostly unknown. We developed a prospective neoadjuvant study (BEAUTY) in high risk BC patients (pts) using weekly T followed by anthracycline-based chemo wherein percutaneous tumor biopsies (PTB) are obtained before/during/after chemo for NGS and PDX. Our goal is to identify novel biomarkers/pathways and develop PDX to test new therapeutic approaches.
Methods: Pts underwent PTB at baseline and after 12 wks of T. Response to T was defined based upon 12 week Ki-67: responder (<15%) vs non-responder (≥15%). Pts with histologic response and absence of invasive BC at 12 wks were classified as responders. NGS was performed using PTB/blood DNA (exome) and PTB (RNA seq). MRI response was classified using RECIST criteria. NGS data were used to identify somatic copy number variants (cnvs) and expressed single nucleotide variants (eSNVs). Non-SCID mice (estrogen supplemented) were implanted ≤ 30 minutes with PTB samples.
Results: Of the first 78 pts, 44 have completed T. Here we focus on 18 pts with either triple negative or luminal B BC. Clinical characteristics according to Ki-67 response are shown in Table 1. Comparison of genomic alterations in BEAUTY pts with TCGA identified a greater overlap with copy number gains (73%) compared to deletions (40%), along with similar observations of mutations in TP53, PTEN, RYR2, and AKT1 genes. Association analysis of CNVs and eSNVs between responders/non-responders identified 33 genes (predominantly located in chromosomes 1, 8, 13) and 580 eSNVs (corresponding to 497 genes) with a p < 0.05. Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis of responders/non-responders identified 198 genes with a p-value < 0.05. Integrated analysis of 539 genes (CNVs, eSNVs and DGE) identified pathways such as TGF-beta, Jak-Stat, WNT and NOTCH signalling. PDX take rate was 44% [triple negative (6/10); Luminal B (2/8)]. PDX growth rate was significantly associated with clinical baseline Ki-67 (p = 0.00014).
Conclusion: This is the first prospective study to demonstrate the feasibility of using PTB to obtain both NGS data and PDX in the neoadjuvant setting. PDX take rate is associated with BC subtype and baseline Ki-67. Studies are ongoing to 1) validate genes/pathways associated with treatment response in subsequent BEAUTY pts; 2) genomically characterize and assess PDX in vivo response to T and 3) Use NGS data to prioritize new drugs/drug combinations in PDX.
Funded by Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine and MC Cancer Center.
Clinical CharacteristicsOverallResponders: 12 week Ki-67 < 15% (n = 9)Non-Responders: 12 week Ki-67 ≥ 15% (n = 9)Median Age495345T stage T2/T314 (78%)7 (78%)7 (78%)Node Positive8 (44%)4 (44%)4 (44%)Triple negative10 (56%)6 (67%)4 (44%)Luminal B8 (44%)3 (33%)5 (56%)Ki-67 after 12 Weeks of T Median 5% (0-11%)Median 35% (17-60%)Complete/Partial MRI Response after T 6 (67%)2 (22%)
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-08-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JC Boughey
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KR Kalari
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - J Eckel-Passow
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - H Sicotte
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SN Hart
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - AM Moyer
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Visscher
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - J Yu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - B Gao
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JP Sinnwell
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Mahoney
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - P Barman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - P Vedell
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - X Tang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - K Thompson
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - TJ Dockter
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KN Jones
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - AL Conners
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SA McLaughlin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - A Moreno-Aspitia
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - DW Northfelt
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - RJ Gray
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - ED Wieben
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - G Farrugia
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C Schultz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - L Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - RW Weinshilboum
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hawse JR, Subramaniam M, Reese JM, Wu X, Negron V, Gingery A, Pitel KS, Shah SS, Cunliffe HE, McCullough AE, Pockaj BA, Couch FJ, Reynolds C, Lingle WL, Suman VJ, Spelsberg TC, Goetz MP, Ingle JN. Abstract P6-04-03: ERb and breast cancer: A potential predictive and prognostic biomarker and novel therapeutic drug target. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p6-04-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial.
Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies.
Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media.
Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Hawse
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - M Subramaniam
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JM Reese
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - X Wu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - V Negron
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - A Gingery
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - KS Pitel
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - SS Shah
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - HE Cunliffe
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - AE McCullough
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - BA Pockaj
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - FJ Couch
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C Reynolds
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - WL Lingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - VJ Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - TC Spelsberg
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hawse JR, Gingery A, Subramaniam M, Pitel KS, Lindenmaier LB, Iwaniec UT, Turner RT, Spelsberg TC, Ingle JN, Goetz MP. Abstract P5-05-01: Endoxifen, a novel breast cancer therapy, elicits unique beneficial effects on bone relative to that of other selective estrogen receptor modulators. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p5-05-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We and others have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-cancer effects of this drug and that endoxifen concentrations are an important factor with regard to tamoxifen efficacy. These studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which phase I clinical trials are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone.
Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast gene expression profiles were compared to that of estrogen, tamoxifen, raloxifene and lasofoxifene by microarray and RT-PCR analyses in both estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and ERβ expressing cell lines. The in vivo effects of an anti-cancer dose of endoxifen (50mg/kg/day) on the skeleton were first analyzed in 3-month-old ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, micro-Computed Tomography and histomorphometry. In a second set of studies, a pre-clinical rat model was used to determine the effects of endoxifen (10mg/kg/day) on the skeleton in both a pre- and post-menopausal setting.
Results: Endoxifen treatment of ERα and ERβ expressing mouse osteoblast cells led to dramatically different gene expression profiles when compared to that of estrogen and other anti-estrogens. In ovariectomized mice, daily administration of endoxifen led to significant increases in bone mineral density and content throughout the skeleton relative to vehicle control treated animals. The numbers and activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts were also found to be significantly higher in endoxifen treated mice. In the pre-clinical model system, endoxifen treatment of 4 month-old ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats significantly protected against bone loss following estrogen depletion primarily due to suppression of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. Importantly, in sham operated rats (thus retaining ovarian function), endoxifen treatment enhanced bone volume and trabecular thickness and did not suppress osteoclast activity.
Conclusions: These data are the first to examine the effects of the novel breast cancer therapy, endoxifen, on bone and reveal that the molecular mechanisms of action of this compound are substantially different than that of other SERMs. Endoxifen was shown to protect against bone loss following estrogen depletion in both mice and rats and interestingly, enhanced bone mass in ovary intact rats, an observation that is in stark contrast to the known effects of tamoxifen which induces bone loss in the “pre-menopausal” setting. These studies suggest that endoxifen may have superior bone-beneficial effects compared to tamoxifen, and if efficacy is confirmed in later phase trials, endoxifen may represent a better drug of choice for a sub-set of breast cancer patients.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-05-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Hawse
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - A Gingery
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - M Subramaniam
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - KS Pitel
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - LB Lindenmaier
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - UT Iwaniec
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - RT Turner
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - TC Spelsberg
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - JN Ingle
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Goetz MP, Suman V, Henry NL, Reid J, Safgren S, Kosel M, Kuffel M, Sideras K, Flockhart D, Stearns V, Denduluri N, Irvin WJ, Ames M. Abstract PD10-08: Venlafaxine inhibits the CYP2D6 mediated metabolic activation of tamoxifen: Results of a prospective multicenter study: (NCT00667121). Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-pd10-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CYP2D6 is the rate limiting enzyme responsible for the metabolic activation of tamoxifen (tam) to endoxifen. Compared to CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM), tam-treated CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) have higher endoxifen concentrations, more vasomotor symptoms (Goetz, MP J Clin Oncol 2005), and are more likely to discontinue tam (Rae, JM 2009. Pharmacogenomics J). Additionally, higher endoxifen concentrations are associated with a stepwise increase in tam side-effects (Lorizio, W Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012). The data regarding CYP2D6 genotype and recurrence is mixed. Venlafaxine is a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor not known to alter tam pharmacokinetics (PK) and commonly recommended for tam induced hot flashes. We conducted a multicenter pharmacological study to determine whether venlafaxine altered the PK of tam and to determine the distribution of CYP2D6 genotypes in this population
Methods: Women taking tam for at least 4 weeks and for whom venlafaxine was recommended for the treatment of hot flashes were eligible. Blood samples were collected prior to and 8–16 weeks following initiation of venlafaxine for steady state tam and metabolites. Genotyping was performed for alleles associated with no (PM; *3, *4, *5,*6); reduced (intermediate, IM; *10, 17 and *41); and ultra-rapid (UM; *1×2) metabolism. Power calculations demonstrated that 17 patients with paired samples were required (two-sided alpha=0.05 t-test, 90% power) to detect a 25% change in endoxifen levels after at least 8 weeks of concurrent treatment.
Results: 30 women (median age 48.5) initiated venlafaxine. CYP2D6 genotypes were within Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE). CYP2D6 UM allele frequency (6.7%) was higher while CYP2D6 *4 (13.3%) was lower than expected compared to an unselected population (0.5 and 21% respectively; Sachse Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997), resulting in the absence of CYP2D6 PM/PM. Mean (min/max) baseline endoxifen concentrations (8.73; 1.5–20.5 ng/ml) were correlated with CYP2D6 phenotype as follows: intermediate (EM/PM, PM/IM): 6.8 (1.5–11.2); extensive (EM/EM, EM/IM): 9.4 (1.5–20.5) and ultra-rapid (UM/EM: 11.0; 7.8–14) (r2 = 0.35 p = 0.05). In patients with paired samples (n = 20), venlafaxine resulted in a 23% decrease in endoxifen (−2.06 ng/ml; 95% CI −0.69 to −3.04; p = 0.004), but not tam, NDMT, or 4HT concentrations. Following initiation of venlafaxine, CYP2D6 genotype was no longer associated with endoxifen concentrations (r2 = 0.28 p = 0.23). For women with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism [EM/PM (n = 9) or PM/IM (n = 1)], venlafaxine lowered endoxifen concentrations (−2.98 ng/ml) to a level (5.41 ng/ml) reported to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence in adjuvant tam treated patients (Madlensky, L Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011).
Conclusions: In this study, women with tam-induced vasomotor symptoms requiring venlafaxine were comprised predominantly of CYP2D6 EM and UM metabolizers. Venlafaxine significantly decreased endoxifen concentrations. Although the optimal concentration of endoxifen is unknown, given prior data linking low endoxifen concentrations with recurrence, venlafaxine should be used with caution in tam treated patients. (Supported by R01CA133049)
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - V Suman
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - NL Henry
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - J Reid
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Safgren
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - M Kosel
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - M Kuffel
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - K Sideras
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - D Flockhart
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - V Stearns
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - N Denduluri
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - WJ Irvin
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - M Ames
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Fairfax-Northern Virginia Hematology-Oncology, Arlington, VA; University of North Caroloina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hawse JR, Cicek M, Subramaniam M, Pitel KS, Peters KD, Grygo SB, Wu X, Evans GL, Iwaniec UT, Turner RT, Ingle JN, Goetz MP, Spelsberg TC. P3-16-09: Endoxifen, a Newly Developed Breast Cancer Drug, Has Anabolic Actions on the Mouse Skeleton. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p3-16-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We have recently demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite with regard to inhibiting the growth of ERα+ breast cancer cells and these studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which first-in-human studies are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone.
Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast (OB) and osteoclast (OC) maturation and gene expression were monitored by cell differentiation assays and real-time PCR. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) and micro-Computed Tomography (μCT) were used to determine changes in bone density, mass and architecture following 45 days of oral endoxifen administration (50mg/kg/day) to 3-month-old ovariectomized (OVX) C57BL/6 mice relative to vehicle control treated animals. Alterations in the numbers and activity of OBs and OCs were determined by histomorphometry and serum levels of P1NP and CTX-1 respectively.
Results: Endoxifen treatment of mouse derived bone marrow stromal cells and human OBs led to significant increases in the expression of critical bone marker genes such as Runx2, osterix, osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin and alkaline phosphatase in a dose dependent manner. Daily administration of endoxifen to OVX mice led to significant increases in total body bone mineral density (BMD) (6%) and content (BMC) (9%), which was accompanied by a 50% decrease in fat tissue mass as determined by DXA. pQCT analysis of the tibial metaphysis revealed dramatic increases in BMD (35%) and BMC (20%), as well as trabecular density (52%), cortical content (62%), cortical area (60%) and cortical thickness (78%). μCT analysis of the femoral metaphysis revealed increases in bone volume/total volume (200%), trabecular number (38%) and trabecular thickness (18%), as well as decreased trabecular spacing (29%). Interestingly, there was nearly a 50% increase in the numbers of OCs derived from endoxifen treated mice which was associated with elevated expression of OC marker genes such as NFATcl, RANK, c-fms and cathepsin-K compared to control treated animals. Approximately 4 times as many OBs and OCs were observed on the bone surfaces of endoxifen treated mice which correlated with nearly 2-fold increases in serum levels of the bone formation (P1NP) and resorption (CTX-1) markers.
Conclusions: These data are the first to demonstrate that endoxifen has anabolic effects on the mouse skeleton which are similar to that of estrogen. Additionally, these data reveal that endoxifen's mechanism of action in bone is different than that reported for tamoxifen and other selective estrogen receptor modulators in mice as it increases, rather than decreases, bone formation and remodeling. Therefore, the use of endoxifen for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer may avoid the detrimental skeletal effects of many conventional endocrine therapies.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Hawse
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - M Cicek
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | | | - KS Pitel
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - KD Peters
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - SB Grygo
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - X Wu
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - GL Evans
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | | | - RT Turner
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - JN Ingle
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | - MP Goetz
- 1Mayo Clinic; Oregon State University
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hawse JR, Wu X, Cicek M, Subramaniam M, Negron V, Lingle WL, Goetz MP, Spelsberg TC, Ingle JN. P4-02-03: Biological Functions of Estrogen Receptor-beta and Its Variants in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p4-02-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies.
Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1.
Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody.
Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.
Collapse
|
35
|
Chang JCN, Mayer IA, Forero-Torres A, Nanda R, Goetz MP, Rodriguez AA, Pavlick AC, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG, Gutierrez C, Schiff R, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF. TBCRC 006: A multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
36
|
Goetz MP, Reid JM, Qi Y, Chen A, McGovern RM, Kuffel MJ, Scanlon PD, Erlichman C, Ames MM. A phase I study of once-weekly aminoflavone prodrug (AFP464) in solid tumor patients. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.2546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
37
|
Forero-Torres A, Lin NU, Liu MC, Rugo HS, Puhalla S, Nanda R, Mayer IA, Storniolo AM, Traina TA, Hayes DF, Rimawi MF, Goetz MP, Esteva FJ, Irvin WJ, Wolff AC. TBCRC 019: An open-label, randomized, phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without the anti-death receptor 5 (DR5) monoclonal antibody tigatuzumab in patients with metastatic, triple-negative (ER, PR, and HER2-negative) breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.tps128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
38
|
Ingle JN, Fridley BL, Buzdar A, Robson ME, Kubo M, Liu M, Ibrahim-Zada I, Batzler A, Jenkins GD, Goetz MP, Northfelt DW, Perez EA, Williard CV, Wang L, Schaid DJ, Nakamura Y, Weinshilboum RM. Genes regulating estradiol and estrone-conjugate levels in postmenopausal women with resected early-stage breast cancer detected by a genome-wide association study (GWAS). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.1001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
39
|
Khurana A, McKean H, Mcguire J, Roberts L, Goetz MP, Shridhar V. Abstract P5-05-12: Heparan Sulfatase 2 Regulates Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Promotes Invasive Ductal Lesions. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p5-05-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogenous group of proliferative cellular lesions that have the potential to become invasive. Very little is known about the molecular alterations involved in the progression from DCIS to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Heparan endosulfatases HSulf-1 and -2 catalyze or edit sulfate moieties on heparan sulfate proteoglycans and have been implicated in modulating heparin binding growth factor signaling. Several studies have suggested that while expression of HSulf-1 is down-regulated and is considered a tumor suppressor gene, expression of HSulf-2 is over-expressed in primary breast tumors and cell lines. However, the role of HSulf-2 in breast tumorigenesis is poorly understood. Here we have evaluated the effect of HSulf-2 in an in vivo model of breast cancer progression (MCF10DCIS.com). These cells form comedo type DCIS and progress to IDC when transplanted in immune-deficient mice and therefore are an ideal model to study breast cancer progression.
Methods: Stable clones depleted of HSulf-2 in MCF10DCIS.com cells were generated and injected into mouse mammary fat pads with non-targeted control shRNA clones (NTC) as controls. HSulf-1, HSulf-2, smooth muscle actin immunostaining and H&E staining was perfromed at weeks 3, 5 and 7. Matrixmetallo Protease (MMP) expression by real time PCR was evaluated at Weeks 3 and 5 in both groups.
Results: A significant reduction in tumor growth was observed in HSulf-2 depleted clones compared to NTC clones (p=<0.01). HSulf-2 immunohistochemical staining showed distinct pattern of staining localized to ductal lesions as well as stromal (myoepithelial and myofibroblasts cells). In contrast, the closely related family member, HSulf-1 expression was restricted largely to stromal and myoepithelial layer in ductal lesions. While HSulf-2 staining remained intense from weeks 3 to 7, HSulf-1 expression was diminished during the same time period. In NTC clones, ductal like lesions were observed by week 3 with disruption of the basement membrane and appearance of invasive phenotype by weeks 5 and 7. In contrast, HSulf2 knockdown xenografts showed retention of ductal like structures even at week 5 and retention of basement membrane (p=<0.05). Additionally marked necrotic areas were also observed in HSulf-2 silenced clones. Previous studies have shown that the malignant epithelium induces the development of the stroma necessary for the development of invasive phenotype. Consistent with this observation, we demonstrated decreased MMP expression in xenografts derived from HSulf-2 depleted clones compared with NTC xenografts (p=<0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that HSulf-2 may play an important role in the transition from DCIS to an invasive phenotype (IDC) potentially by up regulating MMP expression and activity.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Khurana
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - H McKean
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - J Mcguire
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - L Roberts
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - MP Goetz
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - V. Shridhar
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wu X, Subramaniam M, Negron V, Lingle WL, Goetz MP, Ingle JN, Spelsberg TC, Hawse JR. Abstract P2-09-25: ERα Expression in Breast Cancer: A Conundrum of Antibody Specificity? Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p2-09-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively, and its protein expression is prognostic and a primary determinant of endocrine sensitivity; however, much less is known about the role of ERß. In vitro studies demonstrate a tumor suppressive function for ERß, and we have recently implicated a role for ERα in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen. However, the in vivo relevance of ERα remains unclear due to conflicting reports. Here, we provide evidence that some of this controversy may be explained by variability in antibody specificity. In addition, we describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody and provide data regarding ERα expression in human breast cancers.
Methods: Five commercially available ERα antibodies were screened for their sensitivity and specificity using western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in known ERα negative and positive cell lines as well as in normal human tissue samples. A novel monoclonal ERα antibody (C10) was developed and characterized in the same manner. Following identification of two specific antibodies, ERα expression was assessed in 66 breast tumors collected prior to adjuvant therapy. Samples were scored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining.
Results: In depth analysis of commercially available ERα antibodies reveled that the majority were non-specific with substantial cross-reactivity to ERα . Only one commercial antibody (PPG5/10), which solely recognizes full-length ERß, and our newly developed monoclonal antibody, which recognizes full-length and all 4 ERα variants, were determined to be sensitive and specific for ERα expression. These same two antibodies resulted in strong staining for endogenous levels of ERα protein in normal prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry. We further assessed these two antibodies in a set of breast tumors. Preliminary analysis revealed significant differences for ERα positivity between these two antibodies. Based on nuclear staining, 92% of tumors were ERα positive using the PPG5/10 antibody while only 34% were positive with C10. Approximately 50% of all tumors exhibited cytoplasmic staining with both antibodies. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that the majority of commercially available ERα antibodies are either non-specific or insensitive for the detection of ERα via immunohistochemistry. The present data call into question the relevance of prior studies which tested the association between clinical outcome and ERα expression and demonstrate the need to further analyze the role of ERα in breast cancer using highly specific and validated antibodies. While both the PPG5/10 and C10 antibodies are highly specific for ERß, the significant discrepancy in nuclear staining between them in breast tumors may be due to changes in epitope availability as a result of post-translational processing. Our newly developed C10 antibody could provide additional discriminatory features which may be useful in predicting response to therapy and/or associations with other clinicopathological factors and such studies are currently underway.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Wu
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stanich PP, Khambatta S, Sweetser SR, Richardson RL, Goetz MP, Patnaik MM. Spectrum of colon polyposis and colonic neoplasia in the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.3627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
42
|
Patnaik MM, Khambatta S, Robinson SI, Richardson RL, Goetz MP. PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS): Clinical characteristics, onco-phenotype, and molecular analysis. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.1510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
43
|
Connolly RM, Jeter S, Zorzi J, Zhang Z, Armstrong DK, Fetting JH, Wolff AC, Goetz MP, Storniolo AM, Stearns V. A multi-institutional double-blind phase II study evaluating response and surrogate biomarkers to carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel (CP) with or without vorinostat as preoperative systemic therapy (PST) in HER2-negative primary operable breast cancer (TBCRC008). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.tps111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
44
|
McKean HA, Reynolds C, Hoskin TL, Suman VJ, Grant CS, Erlander MG, Ma X, Ingle J, Goetz MP. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and gene expression markers for prediction of invasive recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
550 Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of non-invasive cancers with varying propensity for recurrence. There are no validated markers that identify patients at risk for invasive recurrence following lumpectomy. HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) is expressed in both DCIS and invasive cancer (Ma Cancer Cell. 2004) and associated with recurrence in stage I cancer. A 5-gene molecular grade index (MGI) distinguishes outcome in grade II disease (Ma Clin Cancer Res. 2008). We sought to determine whether H/I or MGI was associated with invasive recurrence in resected DCIS. Methods: We identified patients at Mayo Rochester who underwent lumpectomy ± radiation for DCIS between 1988 and 2001 and performed a nested case/control study. Cases were patients with ipsilateral invasive recurrence, matched to controls based on age, surgery date, length of follow-up, and adjuvant radiation. DCIS was macrodissected from paraffin sections and RNA extracted to obtain H/I and MGI RT-PCR profiles. The association of H/I and MGI with case-control status was assessed with conditional logistic regression; results reported are odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The association of H/I and MGI as continuous variables with nuclear grade (low, intermediate, high) was estimated with Spearman's rank correlation. Results: 427 patients underwent lumpectomy for DCIS, and 33 were identified as possible cases. Histologic review excluded 8 (non-sufficient tissue or DCIS recurrence without invasion). 25 cases were matched to 48 controls (2 controls for 23 cases, 1 control for 2 cases). Both H/I (r = 0.43, p = 0.0001) and MGI (r = 0.41, p = 0.0004) were significantly correlated with nuclear grade. Positive H/I was associated with trend towards higher recurrence (OR 1.9; p = 0.22) that was most pronounced in cases/controls (15/28) treated with lumpectomy alone (OR 3.3; CI: 0.8–13.2, p = 0.09). Similarly, positive MGI was associated with a trend towards higher recurrence risk in patients treated with surgery alone (OR 2.0; CI: 0.6–6.4, p = 0.27). Conclusions: These data suggest that both HOXB13/IL17BR and MGI can identify a subset of patients with surgically resected DCIS who are at risk for invasive recurrence. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. A. McKean
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - C. Reynolds
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - T. L. Hoskin
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - V. J. Suman
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - C. S. Grant
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - M. G. Erlander
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - X. Ma
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - J. Ingle
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| | - M. P. Goetz
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hawse JR, Wu X, Subramaniam M, Goetz MP, Spelsberg TC, Ingle JN. Endoxifen, but not 4-hydroxytamoxifen, degrades the estrogen receptor in breast cancer cells: a differential mechanism of action potentially explaining CYP2D6 effect. Cancer Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract #19
Background: Tamoxifen (TAM) is a standard endocrine therapy for the treatment of women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. TAM is activated by the cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme system into two potent and active metabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4HT) and 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (endoxifen). While human concentrations of 4HT are negligible and vary little in plasma (5-10 nM), endoxifen concentrations vary widely (10-180 nm), and women with genetically impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have significantly reduced endoxifen levels and a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. Despite these observations, endoxifen's contribution to tamoxifen's overall drug effectiveness is uncertain.
 Methods: Using cells endogenously expressing ERa (MCF7, T47D) and cells stably transfected with ERa (Hs578T and U2OS), we examined the relative effects of TAM and its primary metabolites on ERa protein levels by western blotting, ERa transcriptional activity by luciferase reporter assays and real-time RT-PCR, and on ER positive breast cancer cell growth through the use of proliferation assays.
 Results: We have discovered that endoxifen induces ERa protein turnover through proteasomal degradation similar to that of ICI in a concentration and time-dependent manner. These findings are in stark contrast to TAM, N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDT) and 4HT, which stabilize the ER. Optimal degradation occurs only at endoxifen concentrations observed in human CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (> 40 nM) and persists even in the presence of TAM (300 nM), 4HT (7 nM), and NDT (700 nM) at concentrations observed in patients receiving tamoxifen therapy. In contrast, reducing endoxifen concentrations to those observed in a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer (20 nM), without altering TAM, 4HT, and NDT, results in ER stabilization. High endoxifen concentrations (100-1000 nM) completely block estrogen (E2)-induced ER transcriptional activity even in the presence of TAM, 4HT, and NDT, while low endoxifen concentrations (20-40 nM) do not. Further, low concentrations of endoxifen (20 nM) do not significantly alter E2-induced cell proliferation; however, high concentrations of endoxifen (100-1000 nM) completely block this process. Discussion: Our data demonstrate that endoxifen is a potent anti-estrogen that targets ERa for proteasomal degradation, blocks ERa transcriptional activity and inhibits E2-induced breast cancer cell proliferation. Importantly, these effects of endoxifen are observed at concentrations found in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers and are maintained even in the presence of TAM, 4HT and NDT. These studies suggest that endoxifen may be the primary metabolite responsible for tamoxifen's effectiveness in the treatment of ER positive breast cancer and provide the impetus to evaluate whether TAM-related side-effects, such as thrombo-embolism and endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma, are inversely associated with a patient's ability to metabolically activate tamoxifen.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Hawse
- 1 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - X Wu
- 1 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - M Subramaniam
- 1 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - MP Goetz
- 2 Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - TC Spelsberg
- 1 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - JN Ingle
- 2 Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Katipamula R, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Grant CS, Brandt KR, Loprinzi CL, Pruthi S, Goetz MP. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of surgical year and preoperative MRI. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
47
|
Medeiros F, Kolbert CP, Rakshan Rohakhtar F, Kane Lindgren T, Wilson MJ, Rigl CT, Goetz MP, Henner WD, Halling KC. A gene expression microarray-based diagnostic test appplied to patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.22123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
48
|
Holtan SG, Foster NR, Erlichman CE, Aubry M, Ames MM, Safgren S, Steen PD, Morton RF, Graham D, Goetz MP. Gemcitabine (G) and irinotecan (CPT-11) as first-line therapy for carcinoma (ca) of unknown primary (CUP): An NCCTG phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.13525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
49
|
Goetz MP, Moyer AM, Weinshilboum RM, Suman VA, Hebbring SJ, Ames MM, Berg JC, Reynolds C, Perez EA, Ingle JN. Role of SULT1A1 copy number in tamoxifen treated breast cancer: Findings from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) adjuvant trial 89–30–52. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.22041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
50
|
Hobday TJ, Stella PJ, Fitch TR, Jaslowski A, LaPlant B, Ames MM, Goetz MP, Perez EA. N0436: A phase II trial of irinotecan plus cetuximab in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline and/or taxane-containing therapy. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|