ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii21-iii26. [PMID: 25210085 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu255]

A Rare Case of Massive Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Caused by an Ileal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Although gastrointestinal bleeding is a common complication of GISTs, life-threatening hemorrhage is rare, particularly with intestinal GISTs. We report a rare case of an ileal GIST in a 71-year-old female patient who presented with massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Initial CT angiography (CTA) demonstrated a brisk gastrointestinal bleed in the ileal region. Despite embolization of the associated distal ileal artery branches, the patient experienced persistent hemoglobin drops and hematochezia. Repeat CTA revealed a hyper-enhancing exophytic lesion in the proximal ileum. This 4.7cm ileal tumor had to be excised, and histopathology confirmed a low-grade GIST. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity of ileal GISTs and the importance of imaging modalities such as CTA in managing active gastrointestinal bleeding.

Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with neurofibromatosis type I presenting with anemia: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are caused by mutations in the KIT and platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha genes in approximately 90% of cases. A minority of wild-type GISTs are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), an autosomal dominant genetic disease resulting from pathogenic mutations in the NF1 gene, which encodes the neurofibromin protein. NF1 patients often exhibit multi-system involvement, with café-au-lait macules and neurofibromas being characteristic symptoms. GISTs are a rare complication of NF1, with the tumors most frequently occurring in the small intestine (90% of cases), while occurrences in the stomach are rare.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with complaints of dizziness, fatigue, chest tightness, and dark stools. Initial examination revealed a red blood cell count of 1.99 × 1012/L and a hemoglobin level of 43 g/L. She underwent blood transfusions and fluid replacement to stabilize her condition. Further investigations identified typical café-au-lait macules on her trunk, limbs, and face, along with neurofibromas. Endoscopy showed coffee-colored fluid in the gastric cavity, a large submucosal elevation with an exudative covering, and ulcer formation on the gastric fundus. Exploratory laparoscopy confirmed the tumor's origin in the gastric fundus, and resection of the giant GIST was performed. Pathological analysis revealed a necrotic GIST measuring 18 cm × 14 cm, classified as high-risk, with approximately 5 mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields and no tumor at the margins. Immunohistochemistry results were CD117 (+), delay of germination 1 (+), CD34 (+), and succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B intact expression. Genetic testing using next-generation sequencing confirmed an NF1 gene mutation. The patient underwent successful tumor resection and was discharged home with postoperative regorafenib therapy. A follow-up at one year showed no recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Given the diversity of clinical symptoms associated with NF1 and the complexity of NF1-related GISTs, surgical resection with complete tumor removal remains the preferred treatment option. However, the absence of a standardized treatment protocol for adjuvant therapy presents numerous challenges for clinicians.

Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors

Subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) are normally benign intramural esophageal lesions of mesenchymal origin. Although rare, the incidence of SET has increased in recent decades due to the more widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic imaging. The current review aims to provide an overview of the histopathologic spectrum and the most frequent entities including leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diagnostic workup, and multidisciplinary treatment options. Staging for SET should include endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and tissue sampling. Current consensus guidelines recommend that SET suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 20 mm or lesions with high-risk stigmata should undergo tissue sampling. Most SET have an excellent long-term outcome, but malignancy may be present in certain subtypes. Asymptomatic SET without high-risk stigmata discovered incidentally usually do not require specific treatment. However, depending on the size and location of the lesion symptoms may occur. Therapeutic interventions range from endoscopic interventional resections to major surgical procedures. Enucleation via minimally invasive or robotic-assisted access remains the standard of care for most SET sub-entities.

A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions

To date, no prospective study has been conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) and endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) for treating gastric muscularis propria lesions. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of ESR-EB with those of ESR-C for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter. A total of 64 patients were enrolled prospectively from May 2023 to November 2023 at Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University, and the People's Hospital of Zhongshan City. The study compared clinical characteristics, tumour features, and surgical outcomes between the two groups. Of 64 patients, 29 underwent ESR-C, and 35 underwent ESR-EB. There were no differences in age, gender, location, tumour size, growth pattern, resection time, histology diagnosis, or follow-up time (P > 0.05). Complete resection was achieved in all the patients. The operation time was significantly greater in the ESR-C group than in the ESR-EB group (41.31 ± 9.87 min vs. 26.26 ± 10.32 min, P = 0.000). In the ESR-C cohort, 21 patients (72.41%) had perforation, and 1 patient (3.45%) had bleeding. In the ESR-EB group, 7 patients (20.00%) had perforation. The complication rate varied significantly between the two groups (P = 0.000). No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during the follow-up period. Both ESR-C and ESR-EB achieved a 100% complete resection rate for gastric muscularis propria lesions less than 10 mm in diameter.ESR-EB had the potential to reduce the operation time and lower the occurrence of complications. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier ChiCTR2300072856.

III BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS STATEMENT ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND

BACKGROUND

In the past decades, endoscopic ultrasound has developed from a diagnostic tool to a platform for many therapeutic interventions. Various technological advancements have emerged since the last Brazilian Consensus, demanding a review and update of the recommendations based on the best scientific evidence.

METHODS

A group of 32 renowned echoendoscopists selected eight relevant topics to be discussed to generate clinical questions. After that, a literature review was conducted to answer these questions based on the most updated evidence.

RESULTS

Thirty-three statements were formulated and voted on by the experts to reach a consensus. The Oxford System was used to grade the level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

There is mo-derate evidence to support that the needle shape, gauge, or aspiration technique does not influence the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling of pancreatic solid lesions. There is moderate evidence to support using EUS-TTNB of the cyst wall to differentiate between mucinous and non-mucinous cystic neoplasms. There is little evidence to support the EUS-guided treatment of gastric varices. There is a high level of evidence to support that EUS-guided biliary drainage and ERCP present similar outcomes in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. There is a high level of evidence for using EUS to diagnose neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect necrosis before indicating drainage. There is moderate evidence to support EUS-GE over duodenal stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with a life expectancy higher than 2 months. There is a high level of evidence to support the use of RFA in treating both functioning and non-functioning types of NET.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for the treatment of intermediate- or high-risk gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many studies of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (g-GISTs) following endoscopic resection (ER) have typically focused on tumor size, with most tumors at low risk of aggressiveness after risk stratification. There have been few systematic studies on the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- or high-risk g-GISTs after ER.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected patients considered at intermediate- or high-risk of g-GISTs according to the modified NIH consensus classification system. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Six hundred and seventy nine (679) consecutive patients were diagnosed with g-GISTs and treated by ER between January 2014 and January 2020 in three hospitals in Shanghai, China. 43 patients (20 males and 23 females) were confirmed at intermediate-or high-risk. The mean size of tumors was 2.23 ± 1.01 cm. The median follow-up period was 62.02 ± 15.34 months, with a range of 28 to 105 months. There were no recurrences or metastases, even among patients having R1 resections. The 5-year OS rate was 97.4% (42/43).

CONCLUSION

ER for intermediate- or high-risk gastric small GISTs is a feasible and safe method, which allows for a wait-and-see approach before determining the necessity for imatinib adjuvant or surgical treatment. This approach to g-GISTs does require that patients undergo close follow-up.

KIT mutations and expression: current knowledge and new insights for overcoming IM resistance in GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma located in gastrointestinal tract and derived from the interstitial cell of Cajal (ICC) lineage. Both ICC and GIST cells highly rely on KIT signal pathway. Clinically, about 80-90% of treatment-naive GIST patients harbor primary KIT mutations, and special KIT-targeted TKI, imatinib (IM) showing dramatic efficacy but resistance invariably occur, 90% of them was due to the second resistance mutations emerging within the KIT gene. Although there are multiple variants of KIT mutant which did not show complete uniform biologic characteristics, most of them have high KIT expression level. Notably, the high expression level of KIT gene is not correlated to its gene amplification. Recently, accumulating evidences strongly indicated that the gene coding, epigenetic regulation, and pre- or post- protein translation of KIT mutants in GIST were quite different from that of wild type (WT) KIT. In this review, we elucidate the biologic mechanism of KIT variants and update the underlying mechanism of the expression of KIT gene, which are exclusively regulated in GIST, providing a promising yet evidence-based therapeutic landscape and possible target for the conquer of IM resistance. Video Abstract.

Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications

Advances in molecular genetics have revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis, progression, and therapeutic options for treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular landscape of GI cancers, focusing on key genetic alterations implicated in tumorigenesis across various anatomical sites including GIST, colon and rectum, and pancreas. Emphasis is placed on critical oncogenic pathways, such as mutations in tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic modifications. The role of molecular biomarkers in predicting prognosis, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring therapeutic response is discussed, highlighting the integration of genomic profiling into clinical practice. Finally, we address the evolving landscape of precision oncology in GI cancers, considering targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

Long-term outcomes of a phase II study of neoadjuvant imatinib in large gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment is recommended for large GISTs due to their friability and risk of extensive operations; however, studies on the indications and long-term results of this approach are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with large (≥ 10 cm) gastric GISTs were enrolled from multiple centers in Korea and Japan after a pathologic confirmation of c-KIT ( +) GISTs. Imatinib (400 mg/d) was given for 6-9 months preoperatively, and R0 resection was intended. Postoperative imatinib was given for at least 12 months and recommended for 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were enrolled in this study, with 53 patients receiving imatinib treatment at least once and 48 patients undergoing R0 resection. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 94.3% and 61.6%, respectively. Even patients with stable disease by RECIST criteria responded well to preoperative imatinib treatment and could undergo R0 resection, with most being evaluated as partial response by CHOI criteria. The optimal reduction in tumor size was achieved with preoperative imatinib treatment for 24 weeks or more. No resumption of imatinib treatment was identified as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence after R0 resection. No additional size criteria for a higher risk of recurrence were identified in this cohort with a size of 10 cm or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant imatinib treatment is an effective treatment option for gastric GISTs 10 cm or larger. Postoperative imatinib treatment is recommended even after R0 resection to minimize recurrence.

Salvage Hepatectomy for Giant GIST Liver Metastases Unresponsive to Systemic Therapy-Case Report

Therapeutic decision-making for advanced GIST liver metastases is challenging due to limited clinical evidence. This case study aims to demonstrate the survival benefit of resection in non-responsive cases. A 40-year-old male presented with abdominal pain, weight loss, altered general status, massive hepatomegaly, and intermittent melaena. He was diagnosed with stage IV GIST with the primary tumor in the ileal loop and multiple gigantic synchronous bilobar liver metastases. Despite 31 months of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy post-primary tumor resection, the disease remained unresponsive. The patient was admitted to our tertiary center with significant hepatomegaly. A two-stage debulking liver resection was performed after a multidisciplinary team decision. The first operation debulked the left hemiliver through a non-anatomical ultrasound-guided resection of segments 2, 3, and 4. The second operation (7 weeks later) debulked the right hemiliver through a right posterior sectionectomy involving segments 5 and 8. Despite receiving a second line of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy after surgery, the disease progressed both within and outside the liver. However, the patient survived for 55 months, with a postoperative survival benefit of 25 months. In conclusion, this case emphasizes the significant survival benefit achieved through a complex two-stage debulking liver resection for giant liver metastases, even in cases where systemic therapy fails.

Endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Few studies on endoscopic resection (ER) for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) have been conducted, and most have been case reports or case series. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ER for non-gastric GISTs.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2022, 329 patients who were diagnosed with GISTs underwent ER. After excluding 302 patients with gastric GISTs, we retrospectively assessed the data of 27 patients with non-gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 15(55.6%) females and 12(44.4%) males with a mean age of 53.8 ± 11.0 years were assessed. There were 19 (70.4%) GISTs in the esophagus, 2 (7.4%) in the duodenum, 3 (11.1%) in the colon and 3 (11.1%) in the rectum. The median tumor size was 12.0 mm (range 4.0-35.0 mm). Most of the GISTs (20, 74.1%) were very low risk, and the remaining 7(25.9%) were low risk. Both en bloc resection and complete resection were achieved in 25(92.6%) patients. Piecemeal resection mainly resulted from a larger tumor size, an irregular shape, and an extraluminal growth pattern. No residual disease or recurrence was noted during the follow-up period. The median operation time was 23 min (range 2-125 min). After excluding the operation time of EER, the operation time was prolonged to 37 min (range 12-125 min). Only one patient experienced mild abdominal pain, leading to a complication rate of 3.7%. No severe complications requiring for surgical interventions occurred.

CONCLUSION

ER was an effective and safe method for non-gastric GISTs in selected cases. GISTs of a small size and regular shape with an intraluminal growth pattern require complete resection.

EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?

Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are intramural lesions that arise underneath the gastric mucosa. SELs can be benign, but can also be malignant or have malignant potential. Therefore, correct diagnosis is crucial. Endosonography has been established as the diagnostic gold standard. Although the identification of some of these lesions can be carried out immediately, solely based on their echo characteristics, for certain lesions histological examination is necessary. Sometimes histology can be inconclusive, especially for smaller lesions. Therefore, new methods have been developed in recent years to assist decision making, such as contrast enhanced endosonography, EUS elastography, and artificial intelligence systems. In this narrative review we provide a complete overview of the gastric SELs and summarize the new data of the last ten years concerning the diagnostic advances of endosonography on this topic.

Microvessel density in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Microvessel density (MVD) constitutes a direct method of vascularity quantification and has been associated with survival rates in multiple malignancies.

AIM

To appraise the effect of MVD on the survival of patients with GIST.

METHODS

This study adhered to Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Electronic scholar databases and grey literature repositories were systematically screened. The Fixed Effects or Random Effects models were used according to the Cochran Q test.

RESULTS

In total, 6 eligible studies were identified. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for disease free survival (DFS) was 8.52 (95%CI: 1.69-42.84, P = 0.009). The odds ratios of disease-free survival between high and low MVD groups at 12 and 60 mo did not reach statistical significance. Significant superiority of the low MVD group in terms of DFS was documented at 36 and 120 mo (OR: 8.46, P < 0.0001 and OR: 22.71, P = 0.0003, respectively) as well as at metastases rate (OR: 0.11, P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

MVD significantly correlates with the HR of DFS and overall survival rates at 36 and 120 mo. Further prospective studies of higher methodological quality are required.

Comparison of Modified Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treating Intraluminal Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (≤20 mm)

INTRODUCTION

A modified cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (mEMR-C), introduced in this study, was a novel variation of the standard EMR. We aimed to compare the outcomes of mEMR-C and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of small (≤20 mm) intraluminal gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 43 patients who underwent mEMR-C and 156 patients who received ESD at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Baseline characteristics, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to adjust for confounders. After propensity score matching using sex, year, location, and tumor size, outcomes were compared with 41 patients in each group.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients underwent endoscopic resection and the en bloc resection rate was 100%. The complete resection rate was comparable in both groups ( P = 1.000). Approximately 9.5% of all patients had a positive margin. There was no significant difference in positive margin for patients undergoing mEMR-C or ESD (9.3% vs 9.6%, P = 1.000). No difference in adverse events in both groups ( P = 0.724). The mEMR-C was associated with shorter operation time and lower cost than the ESD. Recurrence was reported in 2 patients at 1 and 5 years after ESD during a median follow-up of 62 months. No metastasis and disease-related death were identified in both groups. Propensity score matching analysis revealed similar results.

DISCUSSION

The mEMR-C was found to be the preferable technique for small (≤20 mm) intraluminal gGISTs with shorter operation time and lower cost as compared with ESD.

Emerging Targeted Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GISTs is morphologic analysis with an immunohistochemical evaluation plus genomic profiling to assess the mutational status of lesions. The majority of GISTs are driven by gain-of-function mutations in the proto-oncogene c-KIT encoding the tyrosine kinase receptor (TKR) known as KIT and in the platelet-derived growth factor-alpha receptor (PDGFRA) genes. Approved therapeutics are orally available as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting KIT and/or PDGFRA oncogenic activation. Among these, imatinib has changed the management of patients with unresectable or metastatic GISTs, improving their survival time and delaying disease progression. Nevertheless, the majority of patients with GISTs experience disease progression after 2-3 years of imatinib therapy due to the development of secondary KIT mutations. Today, based on the identification of new driving oncogenic mutations, targeted therapy and precision medicine are regarded as the new frontiers for GISTs. This article reviews the most important mutations in GISTs and highlights their importance in the current understanding and treatment options of GISTs, with an emphasis on the most recent clinical trials.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in the Management of Acute Massive Overt Bleeding of Jejunal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumours. Acute massive overt bleeding from jejunal GIST is very rare and poses both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in emergent conditions.

METHODS

A case series with retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients presenting with acute massive overt bleeding secondary to histologically proven jejunal GIST was done. Clinical characteristics, endoscopic and imaging diagnostic features, histological findings, surgical procedures and outcomes in these patients were studied.

RESULTS

Three patients were included in this case series. Mean age of presentation was 49.0 years with two male and one female patient. All three patients presented with melena and hemodynamic instability, resuscitated with adequate blood transfusions. Routine endoscopic assessment were inconclusive. Multiphasic Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) revealed hypodense hypervascular mass in jejunum in all three patients. One patient was unresponsive to blood transfusion and underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. One patient underwent laparoscopic resection and reconstruction. Mean length of hospital stay was 5.3 days. Histopathological examination confirmed jejunal GIST in all three patients with microscopically negative resection margins. Two patients were disease free till 18-month follow-up and the one patient lost to follow-up after 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Multiphasic CTA is a single-step diagnostic tool for localisation of bleed and assessment of tumour characteristics in emergent conditions. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for both control of bleed and to provide oncologically clear resection margins.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Advanced Techniques for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are subepithelial lesions (SELs) that commonly develop in the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs, unlike other SELs, can exhibit malignant behavior, so differential diagnosis is critical to the decision-making process. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered the most accurate imaging method for diagnosing and differentiating SELs in the gastrointestinal tract by assessing the lesions precisely and evaluating their malignant risk. Due to their overlapping imaging characteristics, endosonographers may have difficulty distinguishing GISTs from other SELs using conventional EUS alone, and the collection of tissue samples from these lesions may be technically challenging. Even though it appears to be less effective in the case of smaller lesions, histology is now the gold standard for achieving a final diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary and invasive treatment for benign SELs. The use of enhanced EUS modalities and elastography has improved the diagnostic ability of EUS. Furthermore, recent advancements in artificial intelligence systems that use EUS images have allowed them to distinguish GISTs from other SELs, thereby improving their diagnostic accuracy.

Insights into the medical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: lessons learnt from a dedicated gastrointestinal stromal tumour clinic in North India

Background

The advent of molecular driver alterations has brought in a revolutionary transformation in the treatment landscape of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). However, there is a paucity of data regarding mutational testing prevalence and associated outcomes from India.

Methods

It was a retrospective study. We reviewed the case records of all patients diagnosed with GIST in a tertiary care centre from 2015 to 2021. The clinicopathological, mutational analysis and treatment plans were recorded. The study cohort was characterised by descriptive statistics.

Results

Our study included 120 patients with a median age of 53 years (range: 28-77), with a male preponderance of 2:1. The most common site of the primary was the stomach (50%), followed by the small intestine (37%), with 55.8% of the patients having disseminated disease at presentation with a predominance of liver metastasis (67%). The prevalence of mutational analysis among patients prior to referral was 4%. 60.8% of the patients at our clinic had mutational analysis performed, and unavailability of analysis in the rest was due to financial constraints (12.5%), exhaustion of tissue (7.5%), reluctance to repeat biopsy (4.1%) and low-risk patients. We report c-kit in the majority (52%), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) in 19.2% and wild type in 16.4% along with the rarer subtypes: succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GIST in 10.9% and Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion in 1.3%. Four of the eight SDH-deficient GIST patients had germline mutations (50%). The knowledge of driver mutations led to a change of treatment in 39.7% (29/73), i.e. stoppage of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 3, switch of TKI in 23, increase in TKI dose in 2 and upfront surgery in 1. The most common change was the use of sunitinib and regorafenib in patients with SDH-deficient GIST.

Conclusion

Our study is one of the largest comprehensive series describing the clinical and mutational profile of GIST from India. The mutation testing rates at primary care centres continue to be low. Despite the hurdles, a large percentage of our patients underwent molecular testing, aiding in therapeutic decision-making.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with a diameter of < 2 cm are called small GISTs. Currently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is widely used as a regular follow-up method for GISTs, which can also provide a preliminary basis for judging the malignancy potential of lesions. However, there are no studies on the accuracy of EUS to assess the malignant potential of small GISTs.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of EUS in the diagnosis and risk assessment of small GISTs.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with small GISTs who were admitted to Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between October 2014 and July 2019. The accurate diagnosis and risk classifications of patients were based on the pathological assessment according to the modified National Institute of Health criteria after endoscopic resection or laparoscopic surgery. Preoperative EUS features (marginal irregularity, cystic changes, homogeneity, ulceration, and strong echogenic foci) were retrospectively analyzed. The assessment results based on EUS features were compared with the pathological features.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients (69 men and 187 women) were enrolled. Pathological results included 232, 16, 7, and 1 very low-, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cases, respectively. The most frequent tumor location was the gastric fundus (78.1%), and mitoses were calculated as > 5/50 high power field in 8 (3.1%) patients. Marginal irregularity, ulceration, strong echo foci, and heterogeneity were detected in 1 (0.4%), 2 (0.8%), 22 (8.6%), and 67 (65.1%) patients, respectively. However, cystic changes were not detected. Tumor size was positively correlated with the mitotic index (P < 0.001). Receiver operating curve analysis identified 1.48 cm as the best cut-off value to predict malignant potential (95% confidence interval: 0.824-0.956). EUS heterogeneity with tumor diameters > 1.48 cm was associated with higher risk classification (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Small GISTs (diameters > 1.48 cm) with positive EUS features should receive intensive surveillance or undergo endoscopic surgery. EUS and dissection are efficient diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for small GISTs.

Is minimally invasive surgery for large gastric GIST actually safe? A comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is frequently utilized to remove small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), MIS surgery for tumors ≥ 5 cm is currently not endorsed by national guidelines as standard of care due to concerns of safety and inferior oncologic outcomes. Hence this study investigates the perioperative and long-term outcomes of MIS for T3 gastric GIST measuring 5-10 cm.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2017 was queried for gastric GIST measuring 5-10 cm or T3 category. Inclusion criteria were known: stage, size, comorbidities, grade, lymphovascular invasion, type of surgery, approach, conversion info, margin status, mitotic rate, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, hospital stay, readmission, 30- and 90-day mortality, complete follow-up, type of institution, and hospital gastric surgery case volume. Binary logistic regression, linear regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used.

RESULTS

In 3765 patients, mean tumor size was 67.3 mm; 26.3% MIS; and 73.8% open. Median hospital stay was shorter for MIS (4.77 vs 7.04 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in incidence of R1 margins [2.9% MIS vs. 3.1% open (p = 0.143)], unplanned readmission [2.9% MIS and 4.1% open (OR 0.474 p = 0.025)], 30-day mortality [0.5% MIS vs 1.2% open (OR 0.325, p = 0.031)], and 90-day mortality [0.9% MIS vs 2.1% open (OR 0.478 p = 0.036)]. Cox regression models for OS showed no difference in survival (p = 0.137, HR 0.808).

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides substantial evidence that MIS for gastric GIST ≥ 5-10 cm may not only offer improved postoperative morbidity but also oncologic safety. Moreover, as both approaches lead to similar long-term survival, national guidelines may need to incorporate this new information.

Trans-anal surgery with the taTME technique for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) surgery is often challenging owing to the anatomical constraints of the narrow pelvis and tumor hugeness. Despite the increasing number of patients undergoing trans-anal total mesorectal excision (taTME) globally, the feasibility of trans-anal surgery with the taTME technique for rectal GISTs remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of trans-anal surgery with the taTME technique for rectal GISTs.

METHODS

Using a prospectively collected database, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical findings, surgical outcomes, pathological outcomes, urinary and anal functions, and prognoses of patients who underwent trans-anal surgery with the taTME technique for primary rectal GISTs at the National Cancer Center Hospital East from September 2014 to March 2020.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with primary rectal GISTs were included in this study. The median distance from the anal verge to the lower edge of the tumor was 40 mm (range, 15-60 mm), and the median tumor size was 59 mm (range, 11-175 mm). Moreover, seven and 14 patients underwent one-team and two-team surgeries, respectively, with curative intent. Nineteen patients (90.5%) underwent anus-preserving surgery, and the urinary tracts were preserved in all cases. Two-team surgery showed a significantly lower blood loss volume and shorter operation time than one-team surgery (58 vs. 222 mL, P = 0.017; 184 vs 356 min, P = 0.041, respectively). The pathological negative-margin resection rate was 100%. During the follow-up period, no patient developed local GIST recurrence and one (4.8%) developed distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Trans-anal surgery with the taTME technique is feasible for rectal GISTs, and two-team surgery may be more advantageous than one-team surgery in terms of operation time and blood loss.

Necessity of Individualized Approach for Gastric Subepithelial Tumor Considering Pathologic Discrepancy and Surgical Difficulty Depending on the Gastric Location

Background: Depending on the location of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs), surgical access is difficult with a risk of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of small-sized gastric SETs and their surgical outcomes depending on location and provide considering factors for their treatment plans. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent surgical resection for gastric SETs (size < 5 cm). SETs were divided into benign SETs and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) for comparison. The clinicopathological characteristics of SETs in the cardia were compared to those in the other regions. Results: Overall, 191 patients with gastric SETs (135 GISTs, 70.7%; and 56 benign SETs, 29.3%) were included. In multivariate analysis, age > 65 years (odds ratio (OR), 3.183; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.310−7.735; p = 0.011), and non-cardiac SETs (OR, 2.472; 95% CI, 1.110−5.507; p = 0.030) were associated with a significant risk of malignancy. Compared to SETs in other locations, cardiac SETs showed more complications (3 versus 0; p = 0.000), and open conversion rates (2 versus 0; p = 0.003). However, the proportion of GISTs of SETs in the cardia is not negligible (52.9%). Conclusions: Considering the malignancy risk of SETs, active surgical resection should be considered in old age and/or location in the non-cardiac area. However, in young patients, SETs located in the gastric cardia have a considerably benign nature and are associated with poor short-term surgical outcomes. An individualized surgical approach for asymptomatic small SETs according to the gastric location is warranted.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Large-Scale, Multi-Institutional, Observational Study in China

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate clinicopathologic features and prognosis of post-complete resection in patients with PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and even to establish a relapse-free survival (RFS) prognostic model for this subgroup.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from patients with primary PDGFRA-mutant GIST who underwent complete resection (2005-2019) at 16 large-scale medical centers in China. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression models were performed to build the prediction model, in which the potential predictors were available in routine clinical practice and using the risk score functions. The prediction model was cross-validated by calibration histogram and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients with PDGFRA-mutant (172 D842V-mutant and 108 non-D842V-mutant) GIST after complete resection were enrolled. Most tumors originated in the stomach (89.6%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 95.9%, 91.2%, and 89.5%, respectively. The RFS of the non-D842V-mutant group was superior to that of the D842V group (P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D842V mutation (P = 0.017), non-gastric tumor (P < 0.001), and Ki-67 > 5% (P = 0.005) were the independent variables influencing the prognosis of patients with PDGFRA-mutant GIST. The scoring model showed the predicted and actual cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-up relapse rates fit well.

CONCLUSIONS

PDGFRA-mutant GIST mostly originated in the stomach and had a favorable prognosis after surgery. Non-D842V-mutant patients might have better prognoses than D842V-mutant patients. The prognostic model demonstrated favorable prediction accuracy, suggesting its clinical utility.

Comparison of Prognosis Between Microscopically Positive and Negative Surgical Margins for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of microscopically positive margins (R1) on primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies up to 23 November 2020. The pooled disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between R1 and negative margins (R0) were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

Twenty studies with 6,465 patients were included. Compared with R0 resection, R1 was associated with poor DFS in patients who did not receive adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.26-2.09; P = 0.48, I² = 0%; reference: R0). This negative impact of R1 disappeared with the use of adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.95-1.60; P = 0.38, I2 = 6%; reference: R0). R1 was related to poor DFS in gastric GISTs (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.15-5.02, I² = 0%; reference: R0), which was attenuated in the subgroup of adjuvant Imatinib (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.32-15.60; P = 0.84, I² = 0%; reference: R0). Rectal GIST with R1 margin who even received adjuvant Imatinib still had poor DFS (HR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.27-11.31; P = 0.54, I² = 0%; reference: R0). Patients who underwent R1 resection had similar OS compared with those underwent R0 resection regardless of the use of adjuvant Imatinib.

Conclusion

R1 was associated with poor DFS for primary GISTs, which was attenuated by adjuvant therapy with Imatinib. Similar result was observed in the gastric GISTs subgroup. Rectal GIST patients with R1 resection had poor DFS even when they received adjuvant Imatinib. The R1 margin did not influence the OS of GISTs.

The necessarity of treatment for small gastric subepithelial tumors (1-2 cm) originating from muscularis propria: an analysis of 972 tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Up till now, there are still controversies about the specific indication of endoscopic resection for small gastric subepithelial tumors (gSETs) originating from muscularis propria. We aimed to investigate the safety of endoscopic resection and postoperative pathology analysis.

METHOD

The patients with primary small gSETs originating from muscularis propria, treated by endoscopic resection in the endoscopic center of Shengjing Hospital between January, 2011 and September, 2019 were enrolled. The complete resection rate, adverse events and clinicopathological features were recorded.

RESULT

A total of 936 patients with 972 gastric SETs ≤ 2 cm originating from muscularis propria were included in our study. All the lesions were successfully treated by endoscopic resection. Nearly half of lesions were proved to be gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [n = 411 (42.3%)] according to postoperative pathology. All the objects were further subdivided into 2 groups, ≤ 1 cm, > 1 and ≤ 2 cm gSETs. The risk of gastric GIST of intermediate/high risk in the group (> 1 and ≤ 2 cm gSETs) is 8.41 times as that of gastric GIST in the group (the size of gastric ≤ 1 cm gSETs) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective treatment for small gSETs. gSETs (1-2 cm) is more risky than gSETs (≤ 1 cm) and should be resected. This should be evaluated by further studies.

Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as the best tool to characterize subepithelial lesion (SEL) features (size, location, originating layer, echogenicity, shape), but EUS alone is not able to distinguish among all types of SEL.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests providing tissue diagnosis for all SELs with features suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) if they are of size > 20 mm, or have high risk stigmata, or require surgical resection or oncological treatment.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) or mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) equally for tissue diagnosis of SELs ≥ 20 mm in size.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends against surveillance of asymptomatic gastrointestinal (GI) tract leiomyomas, lipomas, heterotopic pancreas, granular cell tumors, schwannomas, and glomus tumors, if the diagnosis is clear.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests surveillance of asymptomatic esophageal and gastric SELs without definite diagnosis, with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at 3-6 months, and then at 2-3-year intervals for lesions < 10 mm in size, and at 1-2-year intervals for lesions 10-20 mm in size. For asymptomatic SELs > 20 mm in size that are not resected, ESGE suggests surveillance with EGD plus EUS at 6 months and then at 6-12-month intervals.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic resection for type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) if they grow larger than 10 mm. The choice of resection technique should depend on size, depth of invasion, and location in the stomach.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE suggests considering removal of histologically proven gastric GISTs smaller than 20 mm as an alternative to surveillance. The decision to resect should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting. The choice of technique should depend on size, location, and local expertise.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that, to avoid unnecessary follow-up, endoscopic resection is an option for gastric SELs smaller than 20 mm and of unknown histology after failure of attempts to obtain diagnosis.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends basing the surveillance strategy on the type and completeness of resection. After curative resection of benign SELs no follow-up is advised, except for type 1 gastric NEN for which surveillance at 1-2 years is advised.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 10: For lower or upper GI NEN with a positive or indeterminate margin at resection, ESGE recommends repeating endoscopy at 3-6 months and another attempt at endoscopic resection in the case of residual disease.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Endoscopic treatment can be a viable therapeutic option for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) are extremely rare. We sought to determine whether endoscopic treatment can be a viable therapeutic option for esophageal GISTs.

METHODS

A total of 20 cases with histological diagnosis of esophageal GISTs were obtained from our center between 2008 and 2020. Data on the clinicopathological features and treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 9 males (45%) and 11 females (55%) in this study, with a median age of 56 years. The tumors preferentially occurred in the middle and lower parts of the thoracic esophagus (45 and 40%, respectively). The mean size of the tumors was 2.27 cm and mitotic index was no more than 5/50 high power field (HPF) in all patients. In this study, 11 patients received endoscopic treatment and nine patients underwent surgical resection. Tumors ranged from 0.6 to 4 cm in the endoscopic treatment patients and 0.5 to 7 cm in the surgical patients. There were no significant differences in gender, age, symptoms, tumor location, tumor size, mitotic index, and adjuvant imatinib therapy between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgery group (all p > .05). The Kaplan-Meier curve suggested that there was also no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (p = .264).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment may be an option for the treatment of esophageal GISTs smaller than 5 cm with a mitotic index no more than 5/50 HPF.

Predictors of the difficulty for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor and follow-up data

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are among the most common submucosal tumors in the stomach that require therapeutic intervention. We aim to identify the predictors of technical difficulty during endoscopic resection of gastric GIST and to investigate follow-up outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with gastric GISTs were reviewed from June 2009 to June 2020 at Zhongshan Hospital. Clinical and pathological features, endoscopic procedure information, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. A nomogram was developed and validated internally and externally.

RESULTS

A total of 628 GISTs were finally analyzed. The difficulty was experienced in 66 cases. GISTs size (2-3 cm: OR 2.431 P = 0.018 and > 3 cm: OR 9.765 P < 0.001), invasion depth beyond submucosal (MP: OR 2.280, P = 0.038 and MP-ex: OR 4.295, P = 0.002), and lack of experience (OR 2.075, P = 0.016) were independent risk factors of difficulty. The nomogram prediction model showed a bias-corrected C-index value of 0.778 and acquired an area under curve (AUC) of 0.756 on the external validation cohort. At the cut-off of 0.15, the nomogram's negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACC) were 94.9% and 79.8% in identifying non-difficult GISTs. Follow-up results showed that only five GIST patients had local recurrence after endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size, invasion depth, and endoscopists' experience were risk factors for the difficulty of endoscopic GIST resection. Our nomogram provided a valuable tool for screening non-difficult GIST resection.

Clinical Management of Adult Patients with COVID-19 Outside Intensive Care Units: Guidelines from the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA) and the Italian Society of Pulmonology (SIP)

INTRODUCTION

The Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA) and the Italian Society of Pulmonology (SIP) constituted an expert panel for developing evidence-based guidance for the clinical management of adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outside intensive care units.

METHODS

Ten systematic literature searches were performed to answer ten different key questions. The retrieved evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology (GRADE).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The literature searches mostly assessed the available evidence on the management of COVID-19 patients in terms of antiviral, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment. Most evidence was deemed as of low certainty, and in some cases, recommendations could not be developed according to the GRADE system (best practice recommendations were provided in similar situations). The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies may be considered for outpatients at risk of disease progression. For inpatients, favorable recommendations were provided for anticoagulant prophylaxis and systemic steroids administration, although with low certainty of evidence. Favorable recommendations, with very low/low certainty of evidence, were also provided for, in specific situations, remdesivir, alone or in combination with baricitinib, and tocilizumab. The presence of many best practice recommendations testified to the need for further investigations by means of randomized controlled trials, whenever possible, with some possible future research directions stemming from the results of the ten systematic reviews.

The Incidence of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Obese Patients—A Large Single Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms located mainly in the fundus (60–70%). The incidence of GIST is approximately 10 per million population per year in Europe, with a peak incidence at the age of 63. Recent studies suggest that morbidly obese patients have a higher incidence of GIST than the general population. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of GIST in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in our department. Materials and Methods: this paper present the retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 1564 patients who underwent LSG in a single large bariatric center from October 2013 to September 2021. After surgery, each sample of the resected stomach was sent for histopathological examination. For the analysis, we included patients diagnosed with GIST intraoperatively or postoperatively. Results: GISTs were found in five patients (0.31%). There were three men and two women. The mean age was 50.2 (range 32–63 ± 11.8) and the mean preoperative body mass index was 43.3 kg/m² (40–49.4 ± 3.2). In four cases, GISTs were found in the fundus (80%), and in one in the pylorus (20%). None of the tumors were larger than 7 mm in diameter and all were diagnosed as a very low-risk category. No adjuvant treatment was required. All patients achieved good or satisfactory bariatric and metabolic results. Conclusions: The incidence of GIST in our study was estimated at 0.31%. All patients had a very low-risk GIST and no recurrence until follow-up. Recent literature suggests that the risk of GIST is higher in the obese population, and therefore surgeons should be aware of the risk of incidental GIST during LSG.

Novel endoscopic ultrasonography imaging technique for visualizing microcirculation without contrast enhancement in subepithelial lesions: Prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Detective flow imaging for endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI?EUS) is a new imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without using ultrasound contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate its utility by comparing it with a type of directional power Doppler (eFLOW) for subepithelial lesions (SELs).

METHODS

Between January 2019 and January 2020, 28 patients with SELs undergoing DFI?EUS and eFLOW?EUS were enrolled. DFI?EUS and eFLOW?EUS assessing the vascularity in SELs were compared in terms of the rates of identification of intratumoral vessels. We also investigated how large vessels were depicted in both modalities based on surgical specimens as well as the detection rates of intratumoral vessels in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non?GISTs using either DFI?EUS or eFLOW?EUS.

RESULTS

Among 28 patients, 23 with pathological confirmation by EUS?guided fine?needle aspiration biopsy (EUS?FNAB) specimens were included. Of those 23 patients, the 10 who underwent surgical resection were selected for analysis. The rate of detection of intratumoral vessels in SELs was significantly higher on DFI?EUS (80%) than on eFLOW?EUS (30%) (P\xA0=\xA00.03). Comparison with surgical specimens revealed that detection rate for vessels with maximum size of less 1000\xA0μm was higher in DFI?EUS (66%) than that in eFLOW?EUS (0%). GIST patients had significantly higher positive rates (90%) of intratumoral vessels than non?GIST patients (31%) on DFI in 23 cases including EUS?FNAB specimens (P\xA0=\xA00.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Detective flow imaging?EUS is more sensitive for depicting intratumoral vessels than eFLOW?EUS. Evaluation of intratumoral vessels on DFI?EUS is useful for identifying GISTs without contrast agents.

Transanal approach after preoperative imatinib treatment of a rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors with external anal sphincter invasion: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, and preserving anorectal function can be challenging. We report the case of a patient with rectal GIST with external anal sphincter invasion, treated via the laparoscopic and transanal approaches.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old man with locally advanced GIST in the right anterolateral wall of the lower rectum was examined. Lower endoscopy revealed a 50-mm submucosal tumor located 4 cm from the anal verge. On immunohistochemistry, the biopsy specimen tested positive for CD34 and C-KIT, and the patient was diagnosed with GIST. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed external anal sphincter infiltration. Because of the large tumor size and proximity to the anal verge, preserving the anus was challenging, and colorectal resection was avoided. Instead, neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib was administered to facilitate local resection of the tumor. Post-treatment MRI showed a reduction in tumor size (30 × 20 × 30 mm), and surgery was performed. We identified an appropriate resection line for diplomatic sphincter resection of the infiltrated area by laparoscopy alone. Thus, we performed a hybrid surgery using the laparoscopic and transanal approaches. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 23.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

No study has reported cases of rectal GIST with external anal sphincter invasion wherein anal function was preserved. Here, imatinib was administered preoperatively, and hybrid surgery was performed using the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative treatment and surgery preserved anorectal function in a patient with a massive rectal GIST.

Laparoscopic Partial Gastrectomy for Large Gastric GISTs

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract and the stomach is the most frequently site affected (50-60%). The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for gastric GISTs of sizes larger than 5 cm remains unclear. It depends on the surgical skills, tumor location, and the learning curve of the surgeons.

METHODS

Between December 2013 and January 2021, 30 patients diagnosed with gastric GISTs underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy. This is a retrospective study done in Surgical Oncology unit, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt.

RESULTS

The most common tumor location was in the greater curvature in (46.7%). The mean tumor size was 9.5 cm (range 5-17 cm). All of the patients underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy. Associated splenectomy was done for only one patient. The mean operative time was 152.67 min and the estimated blood loss (EBL) was 139.33 ml. The mean hospital stay was 3.53 days. The mean follow-up period was 32.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs has become a feasible method. Patients with large tumors have the same favorable outcomes as small tumors. Large-sized GISTs may receive neoadjuvant therapy to downstage the disease and make it amenable for laparoscopic resection.

Laparoscopic vs Open Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) from Gastric Origin: different approaches for different diseases

BACKGROUND

Although minimally invasive techniques are currently recognized as effective and validated treatment for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the role of laparoscopy is not yet established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of gastric GISTs compared to the results obtained in a group of patients treated with conventional surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed, using a prospectively maintained comprehensive database of 100 patients treated for gastric GIST in the period from 2000 to 2015. Thirty-six patients were treated laparoscopically and 64 patients underwent conventional surgery. The analyzed medical data included clinical and pathological features of removed tumors, perioperative parameters as well as short and long-term results of surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Histopathological examination confirmed radical resection for all patients. No deaths were reported in the 90-day post-operative period. Patients in laparoscopic group had significantly shorter length of hospital stay (5.5 vs. 7 days, p<0.0001), fewer extended and combined surgical procedures (11.2% vs 34.4% and 2.8% vs 39%; p=0.02 and p<0.001, respectively), and a smaller tumor size compared to laparotomic group (3 vs 6 cm, p<0.0001). The median post-operative follow-up for the entire study population was 42 months. During this period, 11 patients died and 4 of them developed a tumor recurrence. None of them was in the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy in the treatment of gastric GISTs has unquestionable advantages, but its choice is strictly related to tumor features.

Novel Prognostic Nomogram for Recurrence-Free Survival of Patients With Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Surgical Resection: Combination of Prognostic Nutritional Index and Basic Variables

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common type of mesenchymal tumors in the digestive tract, often recrudescing even after R0 resection. Adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS). This study aimed to develop a novel nomogram for predicting the RFS of patients following surgical resection of GISTs.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data of patients with GISTs at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (Tianjin, China) from January 2000 to October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to select the suitable variables from the training cohort to construct a nomogram for 2- and 5-year RFS. The 1,000 bootstrap samples and calibration curves were used to validate the discrimination of the nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic analysis(ROC) was used to compare the predictive ability of the nomogram and present four commonly used risk stratification systems: National Institutes of Health (NIH)-Fletcher staging system; NIH-Miettinen criteria; Modified NIH criteria; and Air Forces Institute of Pathology risk criteria (AFIP).

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the tumor site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, and prognostic nutritional index were significant factors associated with RFS. These variables were selected to create the nomogram for 2- and 5-year RFS (all P<0.05). The 2- and 5-year the ROC of the nomogram were 0.821 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.740-0.903) and 0.798 (95% CI: 0.739-0.903); NIH-Fletcher criteria were 0.757 (95% CI: 0.667-0.846) and 0.683 (95% CI: 0.613-0.753); NIH-Miettinen criteria were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.678-0.845) and 0.718 (95% CI: 0.653-0.783); Modified NIH criteria were 0.750 (95% CI: 0.661-0.838) and 0.689 (95% CI: 0.619-0.760); and AFIP were 0.777 (95% CI: 0.685-0.869) and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.636-0.780). Hence, the predictive probabilities of our nomogram are better than those of other GIST risk stratification systems.

CONCLUSION

This nomogram, combining tumor site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, and prognostic nutritional index, may assist physicians in providing individualized treatment and surveillance protocols for patients with GISTs following surgical resection.

Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Drug-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Feasibility Study

Background

As an emerging clinical problem, locally advanced drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (LADRGISTs) has relatively few therapeutic schemes. Although radiotherapy is not often considered for GISTs, it could be a valuable contributing modality. The aim of our study is to explore a safe and effective radiation regimen for LADR-GISTs.

Methods

Three patients with LADR-GISTs were treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) plans. In the SIB-IMRT plans, gross target volume (GTV) was divided into GTV-outer, GTV-mid, and GTV-center. And the prescribed dose of planning gross target volume (PGTV) and GTV-outer were both set to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. GTV-mid and GTV-center were simultaneously boosted to 60–62 Gy and 62–64 Gy respectively. For comparison purposes, conventional IMRT (Con-IMRT) plans with uniform dose distribution were generated for same optimization objectives without a dose boost to GTV-mid and GTV-center. All plans were optimized to make sure that deliver at least 95% of the prescription dose was delivered to PGTV. Isodose distribution, dose profiles, conformity indexes (CIs), monitor units (MUs), and dose volume histogram (DVH) was evaluated for each individual patient. After the three patients were treated with SIB-IMRT plans, the relative changes in the tumor size and CT values by CT scanning were also tracked.

Results

Compared with Con-IMRT plans, SIB-IMRT plans saw a significant increase from D₉₅ to D₂ of the GTV. With steeper dose gradients in the dose profiles, SIB-IMRT plans had GTV-mid and GTV-center accumulated with higher dose mainly by delivering extra 93 MUs in average. However, there was no significant difference in CIs and organs at risks (OARs) DVH. The relative changes in tumor size and CT values of the three patients in follow up were up to the Choi criteria and the three patients were all assessed as partial response.

Conclusions

The proposed SIB-IMRT may be a potential technique for achieving objective response and prolonging survival of selected GISTs patients.

Comparison of endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A preliminary meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

For localized disease, complete surgical resection is regarded as the "gold standard" therapeutic modality. With the rapid development of endoscopic techniques, endoscopic resection (ESR) has been confirmed as an efficient and safe alternative for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the stomach. Nevertheless, the management of gastric GISTs remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the security and effectiveness of ESR with laparoscopic resection (LAR) for gastric GISTs.

METHODS

A literature search of online databases was conducted to identify relevant comparative studies of ESR and LAR procedures for gastric GISTs published before April 10, 2020. The cumulative data analysis was also performed utilizing the software STATA.

RESULTS

In total, 10 studies involving 1165 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis (651 for ESR and 514 for LAR). From the results of meta-analysis, patients who underwent ESR experienced decreased operative time (P = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.002), earlier time to diet (P = 0.000), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.000), and lower total charges (P = 0.000) compared with LAR. Moreover, there were no significant differences between these two approaches concerning tumor rupture, conversion rate to other procedure, complete resection rate, postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection, as an effective alternative treatment strategy with satisfactory outcomes, is acceptable for selective patients with gastric GISTs compared with LAR. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with large samples are warranted to corroborate our observations.

Striving towards Normality in Daily Life: A Qualitative Study of Patients Living with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour in Long-Term Clinical Remission

Background

This study explored how patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) experience the psychosocial challenges associated with their disease and its treatment, as well as how that experience influenced their practical, relational, vocational, and existential life.

Methods

This qualitative study has an explorative design and applied a phenomenological and hermeneutical approach. We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 20 patients with metastatic GIST in long-term clinical remission. The gathered data were interpreted using a thematic analysis.

Results

Living with metastatic GIST, as well as the side effects of the required medication, led to changes that limited the participants' daily life. They expressed how tiredness, impaired memory, and physical challenges were among the detrimental impacts of the disease on their family life, vocational life, social life, and leisure time. Adjustments were necessary to ensure they had sufficient energy to cope with the practical and relational aspects of everyday life. Feelings of uncertainty stemming from drug resistance, disease progression, and the possibility of early death were also experienced as challenging. Half the participants stated that it was difficult to keep negative mental health issues at bay, and all of them considered the time spent waiting for their scheduled follow-up scan to be burdensome.

Conclusions

It is important to focus increased attention on how the daily practical and psychosocial life of patients with chronic cancer, including metastatic GIST, is affected by their disease. Doing so might provide health-care workers with clues regarding how best to guide and support such patients throughout their emotional journey and, therefore, to improve their quality of life. As new medical treatments can also prolong survival and induce long-term clinical remission in relation to several other forms of metastatic cancer, the findings concerning GIST reported in this study might have widespread implications.

Is nonanatomic rectal resection a valid therapeutic option for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors? A proposed decision algorithm

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The best surgical approach to rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still debated, and both nonanatomic rectal resection (NARR) and anatomic rectal resection (ARR) are applied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of NARR and ARR for rectal GISTs (R-GISTs).

METHODS

Through a large French multicentre retrospective study, 35 patients were treated for R-GIST between 2001 and 2013. Patients who underwent NARR and ARR were compared.

RESULTS

There were 23 (65.7%) patients in group ARR and 12 (34.3%) in group NARR. Significantly more patients in the group with ARR had a neoadjuvant treatment (86%) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (imatinib) compared to those with NARR (25%) (p < .01). The median preoperative tumor size was significantly different between the groups without and with neoadjuvant TKI: 30 ± 23 mm versus 64 ± 44.4 mm, respectively (p < .001). Overall postoperative morbidity was 20% (n = 7) (26% for ARR vs. 8% for NARR; p = .4). After a median follow-up of 60.2 (3.2-164.3) months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 79.5% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 54-100) for the NARR group and 68% (CI 95%: 46.4-89.7) for the ARR group (p = .697), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of NARR for small R-GIST's does not seem to impair the oncological prognosis.

Regorafenib treatment outcome for Taiwanese patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: A prospective, non-randomized, single-center study

The present study aimed to conduct a prognosis analysis of Taiwanese patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), who are resistant to or were unable to tolerate imatinib or sunitinib, and were subsequently treated with regorafenib. The study considered the survival, potential prognostic factors and safety of these Taiwanese patients. A total of 28 patients with pre-treated metastatic GIST, receiving regorafenib treatment, were analyzed between April 2014 and December 2017. Data were collected prospectively, and patients were followed up for a median of 14.8 months. It was reported that 50% (10/20) of male patients and 50% (4/8) of female patients demonstrated response and clinical benefit to regorafenib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time in all patients receiving regorafenib were 4.4 and 29.3 months, respectively. Good performance status and disease control mediated by regorafenib were independently associated with a more favorable PFS time. Good performance status, higher pre-treated albumin level, lower neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lower platelet:lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were independent favorable predictors of OS time. Overall, poor performance status and poor disease control predicted a less favorable PFS time in Taiwanese patients with GISTs, who were pre-treated with regorafenib. Meanwhile poor performance status, high NLR, PLR and low albumin level predicted a less favorable OS time.

Gastric tumors in children: single-center study with emphasis on treatment of repeated recurrence

PURPOSE

Analysis of surgical management and survival of pediatric patients with gastric tumors treated at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with primary gastric tumors treated between 1993 and 2018 was conducted.

RESULTS

Eight patients, five girls and three boys, were diagnosed with gastric tumors at an average age of 10.4 years (1 day-15.4 years). Surgical management included Billroth type I procedure in five and tumor excision in three patients. Histology revealed gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in four patients and one of each of schwannoma, myofibroblastic tumor, hamartoma and teratoma. Microscopically clear margins were reported in six patients. Repeated local recurrence occurred in three patients (2 × GIST, 1 × myofibroblastic tumors) who consequently underwent three, four and six reoperations. One of these patients had liver metastases, which were managed with ligation of the hepatic arteries. This patient was also diagnosed with a lung hamartoma, which was treated with a lobectomy. Survival rate was 100% with a median follow-up of 8.6 years (7 months-25.5 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric tumors are rare in children and represent a management challenge. Repeated recurrence of GISTs and myofibroblastic tumors remains frequent even after complete resection and may necessitate multiple surgeries, therefore patients require a lifelong follow-up.

Histopathological landscape of rare oesophageal neoplasms

The landscape of neoplastic pathology of the oesophagus is dominated by malignancies of epithelial origin, in particular by oesophageal adenocarcinoma and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, several other histopathological variants can be distinguished, some associated with peculiar histopathological profiles and prognostic behaviours and frequently underrecognized in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive characterization of the main morphological and clinical features of these rare variants of oesophageal neoplastic lesions.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic treatment (ET) has been applied for decades to treat subepithelial tumors, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the efficacy of ET remains debatable. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ET for GISTs in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 97 patients who underwent ET. All patients were enrolled from July 2014 to July 2018. Parameters such as demographics, size, resection margin, complications, pathological features, procedure time, total cost, and follow-up were investigated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our study achieved 100% en bloc resection and 77.4% (72/93) R0 resection. The most common location was the fundus with a mean tumor size of 2.1±1.43 cm. The mean age, procedure time, hospital stay, and cost were 59.7±11.29 years, 64.7±35.23 minutes, 6.8 days, and 5,337 dollars, respectively. According to National Institutes of Health classification, 63 (64.9%), 26 (26.8%), 5 (5.2%), and 3 (3.1%) patients belonged to the very low, low, intermediate, and high risk classification, respectively. Immunohistochemistry results showed a 100% positive rate of CD34, DOG-1, CD117, and Ki67. A mean follow-up of 21.3±13.0 months showed no recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSION

ET is effective and safe for curative removal of GISTs in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and it can be a treatment of choice for patients with no metastasis.

Systemic Steroid Treatment for Imatinib-Associated Severe Skin Rash in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

To achieve optimal clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), it is crucial to maintain sufficient dosing of imatinib. Skin rash is a common imatinib-associated adverse event and may affect compliance. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate whether imatinib-associated severe skin rash can be managed with systemic steroids without dose reduction or interruption of imatinib. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03440515.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2014 and 2016, 29 patients with imatinib-associated severe skin rash were enrolled. Skin rash of grade 2 with grade ≥2 pruritus or of grade 3 was considered severe. Oral prednisolone was administered 30 mg/day for 3 weeks, then tapered off over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment success rate (TSR). Treatment success was defined as maintaining imatinib for more than 15 weeks after completion of the steroid administration schedule without skin rash that led to additional steroid treatment or dose reduction or interruption of imatinib.

RESULTS

Of the 29 patients enrolled, 22 patients with skin rash were treated successfully (TSR, 75.8%), 2 (6.9%) were evaluated as treatment failures, and 5 (17.2%) were not evaluable. The 2-year rash-free and imatinib reduction-free interval rate was 67.2% with median follow-up of 22.0 months (range, 0.4-30.3). Recurrence of severe skin rash occurred in seven patients (24.1%). Systemic steroids were well tolerated except in one patient who experienced pneumocystis pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that imatinib-associated severe skin rash can be effectively controlled by systemic steroid treatment without interruption or dose reduction of imatinib in patients with GIST.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Imatinib has been the standard treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in both adjuvant and palliative settings. It is crucial to maintain sufficient dosing of imatinib to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Imatinib commonly causes imatinib-associated skin rash, which may worsen drug compliance. This phase II study demonstrated that systemic steroids could help maintaining the efficacy of imatinib by preventing interruption or dose reduction of imatinib. The present study provides a new administration strategy of systemic steroids and its efficacy and safety data. Thus, this study can be a cornerstone to establish treatment guidelines for imatinib-associated skin rash.

Optimal Endoscopic Resection Technique for Selected Gastric GISTs. The Endoscopic Suturing System Combined with ESD-a New Alternative?

Background and Study Aim: In terms of therapeutic management, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) seem to be the most difficult group of subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions (SELs). Despite various treatment option, choice of optimal management remains a dilemma in daily practice. Our aim was to evaluate a new hybrid resection technique of gastric GISTs type III as a modality of endoscopic full-thickness resection. Methods: Three males and one female (mean age of 68) were qualified for the procedure. Endoscopic full-thickness resections consisted of the endoscopic resection combined with suturing by Apollo OverStitch System. The main inclusion criterium was a complete diagnosis of GISTs (computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), fine-needle biopsy (FNB)) with the evaluation of the tumor features, especially, the location in the gastric wall. All of the tumors were type III with a diameter between 20–40 mm. The lesions were located in the corpus (1), antrum (1) and between gastric body and fundus (2). All procedures were performed in 2019. Results: The technical and therapeutic success rate was 100% and the mean resection time 107.5 min. Neither intra- nor postprocedural complications were observed. In all four cases, R0 resection was achieved. Histopathologic assessment confirmed GIST with <5mitose/50HPF in all of the tumors, with very low risk. Conclusion: Based on our outcomes, endoscopic resection combined with the sewing by Apollo OverStitch of gastric GISTs type III, with the diameter between 20–40 mm, seems to be an effective therapeutic option with a good safety profile, however further studies with a larger treatment group are needed.

Preoperative imatinib and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for large rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Anus-preserving surgery for a large rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) may be difficult because of the location of the tumor in the pelvis. Therefore, rectal GIST might require extensive surgery, such as abdominoperineal resection. In recent years, preoperative imatinib therapy has been used to reduce tumor size and preserve the anus in some cases. However, there have been few reports of laparoscopic anal-preserving surgery for giant rectal GIST.

PRESENTATION OF A CASE

We present the case of a 55-year-old man who was referred to our hospital for examination of a 10-cm pelvic mass in the lower rectum. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration was performed, and the pathological findings resulted in a diagnosis of GIST. The mass had spread to the prostate and left levator ani muscles, and as a result, surgery was deemed difficult to perform without damaging the pseudo-capsule. Therefore, preoperative chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate (IM) was performed for 8 months. The mass was reduced to 7.8 cm, and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) was performed.

DISCUSSION

We also review prior cases of rectal GIST where patients had undergone anal-preserving surgery following preoperative chemotherapy with IM. Our case represented the largest tumor size in a review of cases of patients who had successful anal-preserving laparoscopic surgery following preoperative chemotherapy with IM.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate was effective for reducing the rectal GIST, and laparoscopic ISR was useful for anal preservation, even when a tumor is large.

Laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: A single-center early experience

Recently, there have been important developments in minimally invasive full-thickness resection of subepithelial tumors (SETs) of the upper gastrointestinal tract. However, there remain challenges with techniques such as laparoscopy-endoscopy cooperative surgery (LECS) and non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS). The aim of the present study was to further investigate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (ETFR) of SETs and to evaluate the clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included 16 patients with upper gastrointestinal SETs who underwent laparoscopy-assisted EFTR between July 2016 and December 2017. The patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative course, results of the histopathological examination and short-term outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 10 patients in the LECS group and 6 patients in the NEWS group presented with SETs in the stomach (15 cases) or duodenum (1 case). The mean tumor size in the LECS group (5.6 cm) was larger compared with that in the NEWS group (2.1 cm). R0 resection was achieved in all patients, without adverse events or tumor recurrence. The NEWS group exhibited a lower white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level on the first postoperative day, reflecting the less prominent inflammatory response, less bleeding and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, laparoscopy-assisted EFTR by LECS and NEWS is a feasible and safe minimally invasive treatment option for upper gastrointestinal SETs in selected patients.

Clinical course of suspected small gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach

BACKGROUND

Gastric subepithelial lesions are frequently encountered during endoscopic examinations, and the majority of them are small and asymptomatic. Among these lesions, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the major concern for patients and clinicians owing to their malignant potentials. Although previous guidelines suggested periodic surveillance for such small (≤ 20 mm) lesions, several patients and clinicians have still requested or prescribed repeated examinations or radical resection, posing extra medical burdens and risks.

AIM

To describe the clinical course of suspected small gastric GISTs and provide further evidence for surveillance strategy for tumor therapy.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with suspected small gastric GISTs were reviewed from November 2004 to November 2018. GIST was suspected according to endoscopic ultrasonography features: hypoechoic lesions from muscularis propria or muscularis mucosa. Eligible patients with suspected small (≤ 20 mm) GISTs were included for analysis. Patients' demographic data, lesions' characteristics, and follow-up medical records were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients (male/female, 121/262; mean age, 54 years) with 410 suspected small gastric GISTs (1 lesion in 362 patients, 2 lesions in 16, 3 lesions in 4, and 4 lesions in 1) were included for analysis. The most common location was gastric fundus (56.6%), followed by body (29.0%), cardia (12.2%), and antrum (2.2%). After a median follow-up of 28 mo (interquartile range, 16-48; range, 3-156), 402 lesions (98.0%) showed no changes in size, and size of 8 lesions (2.0%) was increased (mean increment, 10 mm). Of the 8 lesions with size increment, endoscopic or surgical resection was performed in 6 patients (5 GISTs and 1 leiomyoma). For other 2 remaining patients, unroofing biopsy or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was carried out (2 GISTs), while no further change in size was noted over a period of 62-64 mo.

CONCLUSION

The majority of suspected small (≤ 20 mm) gastric GISTs had no size increment during follow-up. Regular endoscopic follow-up without pathological diagnosis may be highly helpful for such small gastric subepithelial lesions.