1
|
Al-Khrashi LA, Badr AM, Al-Amin MA, Mahran YF. Thymol ameliorates 5-fluorouracil-induced intestinal mucositis: Evidence of down-regulatory effect on TGF-β/MAPK pathways through NF-κB. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2022; 36:e22932. [PMID: 34665902 DOI: 10.1002/jbt.22932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a front-line cytotoxic therapy. However, intestinal mucositis is a well-known adverse event of 5-FU, which limits its therapeutic use. Indeed, thymol, which is a monoterpene component of the essential oil derived from thymus, has a potential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activity. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the potential chemoprotective effect of thymol against 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis. Rats were either exposed to two doses of 5-FU (150 mg/kg, ip) and/or treated with thymol (60 or 120 mg/kg). Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers, as well as pathological changes, were assessed. 5-FU-induced severe intestinal damages as were evidenced by histopathological changes as well as oxidative and inflammatory responses. Thymol pretreatment inhibited 5-FU-induced oxidative stress by reducing lipid peroxidation and increasing intestinal levels of antioxidant systems. Moreover, inflammatory response markers, such as interleukin-6, prostaglandin E2, and COX-2 were also improved. The immunoblotting analysis also showed that thymol significantly inhibited the 5-FU-induced expression of nuclear factor-κB, tumor necrosis factor-α, and transforming growth factor β-1 (TGF-β1), in addition to the suppression of p38 and phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinases (p-JNK) mitogen-activated protein kinase proteins' expressions. Our study is the first to demonstrate the promising protective effect of thymol against 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis through inhibition of oxidative, inflammatory pathways, and suppression of TGF-β/p38/p-JNK signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Layla A Al-Khrashi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, KSU, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amira M Badr
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, KSU, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Maha A Al-Amin
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, KSU, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasmen F Mahran
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Radiotherapy in the Management of Non-Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010107. [PMID: 35008271 PMCID: PMC8750160 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Inflammatory breast cancers (IBC) are characterized by a poor prognosis. This retrospective study aims to describe the clinical outcomes of non-metastatic IBC patients treated with a multidisciplinary approach with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. (2) Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all women patients diagnosed with non-metastatic IBC between January 2010 and January 2018 at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional free survival (LRRFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis. Prognostic factors for patient survival were analyzed based on univariate and multivariate regressions. (3) Results: We identified 113 patients with a median age of 51 years. 79.7% had node-positive tumors; triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) represented 34.6% of the cases. A large majority of patients (91.2%) received adjuvant post-mastectomy while ten patients (8.8%) received preoperative radiotherapy. Non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) was observed in 67.3% of patients. Radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 50 Gy to the breast or the chest wall in 25 fractions. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 5-year OS, DFS and LRRFS were 78% (CI: 70.1-86.8%), 68.1% (59.6-77.7%), and 85.2% (78.4-92.7%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, non-pCR was an adverse prognosis factor for OS, DFS, and LRRFS; pre-operative radiotherapy was an adverse prognosis factor for OS and DFS. Radiation-related adverse events were limited to acute skin toxicity (22% of Grade 2 and 2% of grade 3 dermatitis); no late radiation-induced toxicity was reported. (4) Conclusions: High locoregional control could be achieved with multidisciplinary management of non-metastatic IBC, suggesting the anti-tumor efficacy of radiotherapy in this rare but pejorative clinicopathological presentation. While comparing favorably with historical cohorts, OS and DFS could be potentially improved in the future with the use of new systemic treatments, such as PARP-inhibitors or immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhat V, Pellizzari S, Allan AL, Wong E, Lock M, Brackstone M, Lohmann AE, Cescon DW, Parsyan A. Radiotherapy and radiosensitization in breast cancer: Molecular targets and clinical applications. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103566. [PMID: 34890802 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Relatively poor survival outcomes are observed in advanced or metastatic breast cancer, where local control of the primary or metastatic disease may be achieved by surgical resection, local ablative and radiation therapies. Radioresistance, poses a major challenge in achieving durable oncologic outcomes, mandating development of novel management strategies. Although multimodality approaches that combine radiotherapy with chemotherapy, or systemic agents, are utilized for radiosensitization and treatment of various malignancies, this approach has not yet found its clinical application in breast cancer. Some agents for breast cancer treatment can serve as radiosensitizers, creating an opportunity to enhance effects of radiation while providing systemic disease control. Hence, combination of radiotherapy with radiosensitizing agents have the potential to improve oncologic outcomes in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This review discusses molecular targets for radiosensitization and novel systemic agents that have potential for clinical use as radiosensitizers in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasudeva Bhat
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Sierra Pellizzari
- Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Alison L Allan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - Eugene Wong
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - Muriel Brackstone
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Ana Elisa Lohmann
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - David W Cescon
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Armen Parsyan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Science Centre, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada; Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chainitikun S, Espinosa Fernandez JR, Long JP, Iwase T, Kida K, Wang X, Saleem S, Lim B, Valero V, Ueno NT. Pathological complete response of adding targeted therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250057. [PMID: 33861773 PMCID: PMC8051801 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The current use of targeted therapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is based on data extrapolated from studies in non-IBC. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy results in a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with IBC. Method and findings This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO register with registration number CRD42018089465. We searched MEDLINE & PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO from December 1998 through July 2020. All English-language clinical studies, both randomized and non-randomized, that evaluated neoadjuvant systemic treatment with or without targeted therapy before definitive surgery and reported the pCR results of IBC patients. First reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Second reviewer confirmed the accuracy. Studies were divided into 3 groups according to systemic treatment: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, chemotherapy alone, and high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support (HSCS). Of 995 screened studies, 23 with 1,269 IBC patients met the inclusion criteria. For each of the 3 groups of studies, we computed a weighted average of the pCR rates across all studies with confidence interval (CI). The weighted averages (95% CIs) were as follows: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, 31.6% (26.4%-37.3%), chemotherapy alone, 13.0% (10.3%-16.2%), and high-dose chemotherapy with HSCS, 23.0% (18.7%-27.7%). The high pCR by targeted therapy group came from anti-HER2 therapy, 54.4% (44.3%-64.0%). Key limitations of this study included no randomized clinical studies that included only IBC patients. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is more effective than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for IBC patients. These findings support current IBC standard practice in particular the use of anti-HER2 targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudpreeda Chainitikun
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Jose Rodrigo Espinosa Fernandez
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - James P. Long
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Toshiaki Iwase
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kumiko Kida
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Sadia Saleem
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Bora Lim
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Vicente Valero
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic and Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chainitikun S, Saleem S, Lim B, Valero V, Ueno NT. Update on systemic treatment for newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. J Adv Res 2021; 29:1-12. [PMID: 33842000 PMCID: PMC8020152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, accounting for 2-4% of new cases of breast cancer. Owing to its aggressive nature, IBC represent approximately 8-10% of breast cancer deaths. Management of IBC requires a multidisciplinary team for decision-making involving a composite of systemic treatment, surgery, and radiation, or "Trimodality Treatment." Because of the rarity of the disease, systemic therapy of IBC traditionally has been extrapolated from non-IBC clinical trials. Aim of Review The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the development of systemic treatment of IBC from the past to the present by focusing on IBC clinical trials, including chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Key Scientific Concepts of Review We discuss their effects on pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival outcomes, the predictive markers, and the adverse events of these therapies. Further, we summarized the current standard treatment stratified by molecular subtypes based on clinical data. Finally, we discuss the future trend of systemic therapy, including immunotherapy and ongoing IBC clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudpreeda Chainitikun
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Sadia Saleem
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Bora Lim
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Vicente Valero
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bomfin LE, Braga CM, Oliveira TA, Martins CS, Foschetti DA, Santos AAQA, Costa DVS, Leitão RFC, Brito GAC. 5-Fluorouracil induces inflammation and oxidative stress in the major salivary glands affecting salivary flow and saliva composition. Biochem Pharmacol 2017; 145:34-45. [PMID: 28867645 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on the histological aspects of the major salivary glands, salivary flow and saliva composition using an established oral mucositis model in hamsters. Oral mucositis was induced by two intraperitoneal administrations of 5-FU in two consecutive days (60 and 40mg/kg), followed by cheek pouch mucosa scratch, on day 4. The Pilocarpine-stimulated salivary flow was measured 4 and 10days after the first 5-FU injection. Salivary glands were harvested for histopathological analysis, measurement of inflammatory cells, quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β), investigation of cell death and cell proliferation. Oxidative stress and oxidative defense system were also investigated in the salivary gland tissues using MDA (malondialdehyde), nitrite, non-protein sulfhydryl groups (NP-SH), SOD (superoxide dismutase) and CAT (catalase). In addition, the CAT and lysozyme activities and the IgA and SOD levels were evaluated in the saliva samples. 5-FU significantly reduced the pilocarpine-stimulated salivary flow rate on the 4th experimental day, associated with an increase in the SOD levels in saliva. Recovery of the salivary flow and SOD were observed on day 10, when an increase in the saliva lysozyme levels was detected. In addition, 5-FU promoted vacuolization in parotid (P) and periductal edema in submandibular (SM) gland, combined with an increase in the inflammatory cells influx, mostly observed on the 4th day in SM gland and on 4th and 10th days in P. Oxidative stress was found mostly on day 10 in SM, SL and P glands, associated with release of proinflammatory cytokines, observed in SM and SL glands, but not in P. 5-FU induces an inflammatory response in the major salivary glands, most observed ten days after its first injection, which may contribute to the major salivary glands hypofunction, leading to alterations in the salivary flow rate and composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana E Bomfin
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Cíntia M Braga
- Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Thais A Oliveira
- Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Conceição S Martins
- Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Danielle A Foschetti
- Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Ana A Q A Santos
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Deiziane V S Costa
- Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Renata F C Leitão
- Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Gerly A C Brito
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Costa R, Santa-Maria CA, Rossi G, Carneiro BA, Chae YK, Gradishar WJ, Giles FJ, Cristofanilli M. Developmental therapeutics for inflammatory breast cancer: Biology and translational directions. Oncotarget 2017; 8:12417-12432. [PMID: 27926493 PMCID: PMC5355355 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer, which accounts for approximately 3% of cases of breast malignancies. Diagnosis relies largely on its clinical presentation, and despite a characteristic phenotype, underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Unique clinical presentation indicates that IBC is a distinct clinical and biological entity when compared to non-IBC. Biological understanding of non-IBC has been extrapolated into IBC and targeted therapies for HER2 positive (HER2+) and hormonal receptor positive non-IBC led to improved patient outcomes in the recent years. This manuscript reviews recent discoveries related to the underlying biology of IBC, clinical progress to date and suggests rational approaches for investigational therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Costa
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America
| | - Cesar A Santa-Maria
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| | - Giovanna Rossi
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| | - Benedito A Carneiro
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| | - Young Kwang Chae
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| | - William J Gradishar
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| | - Francis J Giles
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States of America.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Similar response profile to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but different survival, in inflammatory versus locally advanced breast cancers. Oncotarget 2017; 8:66019-66032. [PMID: 29029489 PMCID: PMC5630389 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a very aggressive form of breast cancer, as compared to locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is the standard treatment in both cases. Whether IBC is less chemosensitive than LABC remains unclear. We retrospectively compared the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in IBC and LABC. Methods: Patients with IBC or LABC treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by surgery were selected from our institutional database. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate, defined as absence of invasive tumor in breast and axillary lymph nodes. Results: A total of 450 patients were included, 144 with IBC and 306 with LABC. The pCR rate was similar between the two groups, in the whole population (31%) and in each molecular subtype separately. Univariate analyses for pCR in IBC and LABC separately identified the same predictive variables, except the pathological type that was associated with pCR in LABC only, but not in IBC. IBC patients displayed shorter 5-year metastasis-free survival and overall survival than LABC patients in the whole population (57% and 69% versus74% and 88% respectively), and in each molecular subtype separately. The IBC phenotype was an independent prognostic feature. Similarly, IBC patients displayed shorter 5-year loco-regional relapse-free survival than LABC patients (86% versus 95%). Conclusions: Similar pCR rates to chemotherapy were found in IBC and LABC, suggesting that IBC is not less chemosensitive than LABC. Survival was shorter in IBC, suggesting that the corresponding poorer prognosis is more due to a higher metastatic risk and/or other feature(s) than to a lesser chemosensitivity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gonçalves A, Monneur A, Viens P, Bertucci F. The use of systemic therapies to prevent progression of inflammatory breast cancer: which targeted therapies to add on cytotoxic combinations? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:593-606. [PMID: 28506194 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1330655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare but frequently fatal disease, essentially because of its high ability to develop distant metastases. Even though the prognosis of IBC was significantly improved by multimodal management, including the systematic use of cytotoxic-based induction, the prognosis remains largely dismal. Areas covered: This review presents the main achievements in the systemic treatment of IBC during the past 30 years. It focuses more specifically on recent results obtained with targeted therapies, including anti-HER2 and anti-angiogenic agents. Novel approaches under investigation are presented. Expert commentary: Current management of IBC is subtype-specific and the largest benefit has been achieved in HER2-positive disease. The identification of breakthrough therapeutic advances is eagerly awaited and will require the development of IBC-specific clinical trials. Future clinical investigations should not only aim to increase the pathological response rate but also to eradicate distant metastases, which ultimately lead to patient death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Gonçalves
- a Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ , CNRS U7258, INSERM U1068, CRCM , Marseille , France
| | - Audrey Monneur
- a Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ , CNRS U7258, INSERM U1068, CRCM , Marseille , France
| | - Patrice Viens
- a Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ , CNRS U7258, INSERM U1068, CRCM , Marseille , France
| | - François Bertucci
- a Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Univ , CNRS U7258, INSERM U1068, CRCM , Marseille , France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cheng YC, Shi Y, Zhang MJ, Brazauskas R, Hemmer MT, Bishop MR, Nieto Y, Stadtmauer E, Ayash L, Gale RP, Lazarus H, Holmberg L, Lill M, Olsson RF, Wirk BM, Arora M, Hari P, Ueno N. Long-Term Outcome of Inflammatory Breast Cancer Compared to Non-Inflammatory Breast Cancer in the Setting of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. J Cancer 2017; 8:1009-1017. [PMID: 28529613 PMCID: PMC5436253 DOI: 10.7150/jca.16870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare aggressive form of breast cancer. It is well known that the long-term survival and progression-free survival of IBC are worse than that of non-IBC. We report the long term outcomes of patients with IBC and non-IBC who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Methods: All 3387 patients with IBC or non-IBC who underwent HDC with AHCT between1990-2002 and registered with CIBMTR were included in this analysis. Transplant-related mortality (TRM), disease relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two cohorts. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to determine the independent impact of stage on outcomes. Results: 527 patients with IBC and 2,860 patients with non-IBC were included; the median age at transplantation (47 vs 46 years old) and median follow-up period in the 2 groups (167 vs 168 months) were similar. The most common conditioning regimen was cyclophosphamide and carboplatin based in both groups (54% in IBC and 50% in non-IBC). AHCT was well tolerated in both groups. TRM was similar in both groups (one year TRM was 2% for IBC and 3% for non-IBC, p=0.16). The most common cause of death was disease progression or relapse (81% in IBC and 75% in non-IBC). The median survival for both IBC and non-IBC was the same at 40 months. The PFS at 10 years was 27% (95% CI: 23-31%) for IBC and 24% (95% CI: 22-26%) for non-IBC (p=0.21), and the OS at 10 years was 31% (95% CI: 27-35%) for IBC and 28% (95% CI: 26-30%) for non-IBC (p=0.16). In univariate analysis, patients with stage III IBC and no active diseases at transplantation had lower PFS and OS than that in non-IBC. In multivariate analysis, controlling for age, disease status at AHCT, hormonal receptor status, time from diagnosis to AHCT, and performance status at AHCT, patients with stage III IBC had higher mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1-1.34, p= 0.0459), worse PFS (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.36, p= 0.0339) and higher risk of disease relapse/progression (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45, p= 0.0082) as compared to stage III non-IBC. Amongst all patients a higher stage disease was associated with worse PFS, OS and disease relapse/progression. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of stage III IBC patients who underwent AHCT were poorer than that in non-IBC patients confirming that the poor prognosis of IBC even in the setting of HDC with AHCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yushu Shi
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Mei-Jie Zhang
- CIBMTR(Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.,Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Ruta Brazauskas
- CIBMTR(Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Michael T Hemmer
- CIBMTR(Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edward Stadtmauer
- Abramson Cancer Center University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lois Ayash
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Division of Hematology, Oncology, Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Hematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hillard Lazarus
- Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Richard F Olsson
- Division of Therapeutic Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research Sormland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Baldeep Mona Wirk
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplant, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Mukta Arora
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Parameswaran Hari
- CIBMTR(Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Naoto Ueno
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boudin L, Gonçalves A, Sfumato P, Sabatier R, Bertucci F, Tarpin C, Provansal M, Houvenaeghel G, Lambaudie E, Tallet A, Resbeut M, Charafe-Jauffret E, Calmels B, Lemarie C, Boher JM, Extra JM, Viens P, Chabannon C. Prognostic impact of hormone receptor- and HER2-defined subtypes in inflammatory breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy: a retrospective study. J Cancer 2016; 7:2077-2084. [PMID: 27877223 PMCID: PMC5118671 DOI: 10.7150/jca.15797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Studies examining high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDC-AHSCT) strategies in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), showed encouraging results in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The lack of data regarding HER2 status in all of these studies prevented any prognostic analysis involving breast cancer subtypes. Methods: All consecutive female patients treated for IBC with HDC and AHSCT at Institut Paoli-Calmettes between 2003 and 2012 were included. Since 2005, trastuzumab was included in initial treatment. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected. Patients were categorized in three subtypes based on hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2 status of the primary tumor: Luminal, (HR+/HER2-), HER2 (HER2+, any HR), and triple negative (TN) (HER2- and HR-). The main objective was the analysis of OS according to the IHC subtypes. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included. Eleven patients received trastuzumab. Median follow up was 80.04 months (95% CI 73.2-88.08). Five-year OS and DFS for the whole population patients were 74% (95% CI 61-83) and 65 % (95% CI 52-75), respectively. OS differed across subtypes (p=0.057) : HER2 subgroup appeared to have the best prognosis with a 5-year OS of 89% (95% CI 64-97) compared to 57% (95% CI 33-76) for the TN subgroup (HR 5.38, 95% CI 1.14-25.44; p=0.034). Conclusions: In IBC patients receiving HDC-AHSCT, OS favorably compares with data available in the literature on similar groups of patients. TN patients carried the least favourable OS and HER2 patients, half of them also receiving trastuzumab, had the best outcome. These findings provide additional information and options for patients with IBC and who could potentially benefit of HDC-AHSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurys Boudin
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France.; Département d'Oncologie médicale, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte Anne, Toulon, 83000, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France
| | - Patrick Sfumato
- Biostatistiques, Département de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation (DRCI), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France
| | - Carole Tarpin
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Magali Provansal
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France.; Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F -13273, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France.; Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F -13273, France
| | - Agnes Tallet
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Michel Resbeut
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France.; Biopathologie, Département de Biologie du Cancer Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Boris Calmels
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte Anne, Toulon, 83000, France.; Centre de Thérapie Cellulaire, Département de Biologie du Cancer, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre d'Investigations Cliniques en Biothérapies, Inserm CBT-1409, Marseille, F-13009, France
| | - Claude Lemarie
- Centre de Thérapie Cellulaire, Département de Biologie du Cancer, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre d'Investigations Cliniques en Biothérapies, Inserm CBT-1409, Marseille, F-13009, France
| | - Jean-Marie Boher
- Biostatistiques, Département de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation (DRCI), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Jean-Marc Extra
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France
| | - Patrice Viens
- Département d'Oncologie médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), UMR Inserm 1068 / CNRS 7258 / AMU 105 / IPC, Marseille, F-13009, France.; Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France
| | - Christian Chabannon
- Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, F-13284, France.; Centre de Thérapie Cellulaire, Département de Biologie du Cancer, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, F-13273, France.; Centre d'Investigations Cliniques en Biothérapies, Inserm CBT-1409, Marseille, F-13009, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bertucci F, Goncalves A, Viens P. Bevacizumab in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer. Oncoscience 2016; 3:297-298. [PMID: 28105446 PMCID: PMC5235910 DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Patrice Viens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bevacizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer (BEVERLY-1): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:600-11. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00011-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|