A 95-gene signature stratifies recurrence risk of invasive disease in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer with intermediate 21-gene signature recurrence scores

PURPOSE

A subset of patients with intermediate 21-gene signature assay recurrence score may benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy, but a predictive strategy is needed to identify such patients. The 95-gene signature assay was tested to stratify patients with intermediate RS into high (95GC-H) and low (95GC-L) groups that were associated with invasive recurrence risk.

METHODS

Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and RS 11-25 who underwent definitive surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy without any cytotoxic agents were included. RNA was extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, and 95-gene signature was calculated.

RESULTS

206 patients had RS of 11-25 (95GC-L, N = 163; 95GC-H, N = 43). In Cox proportional hazards model, 95GC-H was significantly associated with shorter time to recurrence than was 95GC-L (HR 5.94; 95%CI 1.81-19.53; P = 0.005). The correlation between 95-gene signature and 21-gene signature assay scores was not strong (correlation coefficient r = 0.27), which might suggest that 95-gene signature reflects biological characteristics differing from what 21-gene signature shows.

CONCLUSIONS

The 95-gene signature stratifies patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancer and intermediate RS of 11-25 into high and low groups that are associated with recurrence risk of invasive disease. Further retrospective analysis in the prospectively accrued TAILORx population is warranted to confirm that 95-gene signature can identify patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.

Pathological complete response of adding targeted therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review

Background

The current use of targeted therapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is based on data extrapolated from studies in non-IBC. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy results in a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with IBC.

Method and findings

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO register with registration number CRD42018089465. We searched MEDLINE & PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO from December 1998 through July 2020. All English-language clinical studies, both randomized and non-randomized, that evaluated neoadjuvant systemic treatment with or without targeted therapy before definitive surgery and reported the pCR results of IBC patients. First reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Second reviewer confirmed the accuracy. Studies were divided into 3 groups according to systemic treatment: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, chemotherapy alone, and high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support (HSCS). Of 995 screened studies, 23 with 1,269 IBC patients met the inclusion criteria. For each of the 3 groups of studies, we computed a weighted average of the pCR rates across all studies with confidence interval (CI). The weighted averages (95% CIs) were as follows: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, 31.6% (26.4%-37.3%), chemotherapy alone, 13.0% (10.3%-16.2%), and high-dose chemotherapy with HSCS, 23.0% (18.7%-27.7%). The high pCR by targeted therapy group came from anti-HER2 therapy, 54.4% (44.3%-64.0%). Key limitations of this study included no randomized clinical studies that included only IBC patients.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is more effective than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for IBC patients. These findings support current IBC standard practice in particular the use of anti-HER2 targeted therapy.

Identification of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines classified under the same molecular subtype using different molecular characterization techniques: Implications for translational research

The original algorithm that classified triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) into six subtypes has recently been revised. The revised algorithm (TNBCtype-IM) classifies TNBC into five subtypes and a modifier based on immunological (IM) signatures. The molecular signature may differ between cancer cells in vitro and their respective tumor xenografts. We identified cell lines with concordant molecular subtypes regardless of classification algorithm or analysis of cells in vitro or in vivo, to establish a panel of clinically relevant molecularly stable TNBC models for translational research. Gene expression data were used to classify TNBC cell lines using the original and the revised algorithms. Tumor xenografts were established from 17 cell lines and subjected to gene expression profiling with the original 2188-gene algorithm TNBCtype and the revised 101-gene algorithm TNBCtype-IM. A total of six cell lines (SUM149PT (BL2), HCC1806 (BL2), SUM149PT (BL2), BT549 (M), MDA-MB-453 (LAR), and HCC2157 (BL1)) maintained their subtype classification between in vitro and tumor xenograft analyses across both algorithms. For TNBC molecular classification-guided translational research, we recommend using these TNBC cell lines with stable molecular subtypes.

Abstract P4-10-22: Loss of androgen receptor after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in patients with locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer

Background.Androgen receptor (AR) is widely expressed in different breast cancer subtypes. AR plays an important role in promoting the growth of HER2 +  breast cancer through cross-talk with HER2 signaling, including WNT7B upregulation, beta-catenin activation, stimulation of HER3 gene transcription, and promotion of HER2/HER3 heterodimerization. Preclinical data have shown that inhibiting AR with enzalutamide results in decreased HER2 phosphorylation and activation of ERK and AKT, without affecting HER2 and HER3 expression; however, the role that inhibiting HER2 with anti-HER2 therapy plays in AR expression and regulation is still unknown. In this study, we sought to identify the influence of anti-HER2 therapy on AR and estrogen receptor (ER) expression after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Methods.We retrospectively collected data from 68 patients with locally advanced HER2+ breast cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. AR and ER levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in available initial biopsy specimens and in surgical specimens of all patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. AR was assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining using AR441 antibody from DAKO. Expression in >10% of cells was considered positive. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as ypT0/is, ypN0. ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the correlation between AR score and pCR. Results.Twenty-five patients had pretreatment tissue available. Eighteen (72%) were positive for AR staining and 20 (80%) for ER staining. Of the 25 cases, 10 (40%) achieved a pCR and 15 (60%) did not. The median AR score for those with a pCR was higher, 20 (range 0, 80) vs 10 (range 0, 70). The area under the ROC curve was 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.35, 0.83); we found no statistically significant relationship between AR score and pCR (p = 0.47). All nine cases positive for AR before neoadjuvant therapy who had residual tissue for staining after therapy had negative AR staining after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Of 18 cases positive for ER before neoadjuvant therapy who had residual tissue for staining after therapy, only 6 (33%) had negative ER staining after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Further, all patients initially positive for AR and ER remained ER positive but were AR negative after therapy. Conclusions. We found that in 100% of cases AR positivity disappeared after anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy in patients with residual disease, whereas ER positivity disappeared in only 33% of cases, suggesting that blocking HER2 may inhibit positive feedback with AR; however, both AR and ER receptors have independent biological interactions with HER2 that need to be explored. We plan to confirm our results with a larger sample size, and we will continue to monitor our patients to determine the influence of AR negativity after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy on disease-free and overall survival.

Citation Format: Jose Rodrigo Espinosa Fernandez, Aysegul A. Sahin, Kenneth R. Hess, Raul Gerardo Ramirez Medina, Paula Anel Cabrera Galeana, Alejandro Javier España Ferrufino, Nereida Esparza Arias, Juan Enrique Bargallo Rocha, José Antonio García Gordillo, Gerardo Emmanuel Lopez Muñiz, Naoto T Ueno. Loss of androgen receptor after neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in patients with locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-22.

International Consensus on the Clinical Management of Inflammatory Breast Cancer from the Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program 10th Anniversary Conference

National and international experts in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) from high-volume centers treating IBC recently convened at the 10th Anniversary Conference of the Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston Texas. A consensus on the clinical management of patients with IBC was discussed, summarized, and subsequently reviewed. All participants at the conference (patients, advocates, researchers, trainees, and clinicians) were queried using the MDRing electronic survey on key management issues. A summary of the expert consensus and participant voting is presented. Bilateral breast and nodal evaluation, breast magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and medical photographs were endorsed as optimal. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy, modified radical mastectomy and level I and II ipsilateral axillary node dissection, post-mastectomy radiotherapy, adjuvant targeted therapy and hormonal therapy as indicated, and delayed reconstruction were agreed-upon fundamental premises of standard non-protocol-based treatment for IBC. Consideration for local-regional therapy in de novo stage IV IBC was endorsed to provide local control whenever feasible. Variation across centers and special circumstances were discussed.

Dynamic changes in CD44v-positive cells after preoperative anti-HER2 therapy and its correlation with pathologic complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer

Chemotherapy has been reported to increase the proportion of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype changes. Anti-HER2 therapy may provide a strategy for eliminating CSC and EMT, which contribute to therapeutic resistance. No study has determined the changes in the quantity or characteristics of CSCs or circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with EMT phenotype during preoperative anti-HER2 therapy, and whether these changes correlate to response to dual anti-HER2 therapy. In a prospective clinical trial to evaluate pharmacodynamic biomarkers, 18 patients with operable primary HER2-positive breast cancer received dual anti-Her2 preoperative therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib with paclitaxel. Proportions of tumor cells with CSC characteristics and EMT markers in CTC's were estimated at baseline, after 6 and 18 weeks of preoperative therapy to determine the quantitative cutoff value to predict pathologic complete response (pCR). Out of 18 patients, 8 (44%) had a pCR; 5 of these 8 patients (62%) were positive for CD44v at baseline and none were positive on the 6-week biopsy. In contrast, 6 of the 10 patients without pCR exhibited persistent levels, or enrichment of CD44v proportion and expression at 6 and 18 weeks (p=0.0128). Other biomarkers were not statistically significant predictors of pCR. Enrichment of CD44v-positive tumor cells after dual anti-HER2 therapy alone may predict poor response to dual anti-HER2 therapy plus chemotherapy.

Androgen receptor expression on circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Comprehensive assessment of cancer stem cell like cells in prediction of pathologic complete response to preoperative dual anti–HER2 therapy for HER2–positive primary breast cancer

e12123

Background: Chemotherapy for breast cancer destroys non–stem cells while sparing cancer stem cells (CSCs). In contrast, anti–HER2 therapy may eliminate resistant cells because HER2 may be a key driver of CSCs. CSC biomarkers have been found to be prognostic of poor outcome and predictive of resistance to therapy. However, there are no comprehensive studies of the impact of anti-HER2 therapies on CSC–related biomarkers. We conducted a prospective biomarker determination study of breast CSCs characterized by CD44v expression and increased aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) enzymatic activity or expression. Methods: In a prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01688609), 18 patients with operable primary HER2+ breast cancer (≥T2 excluding inflammatory, any N; median age of 54 yrs) were treated with preoperative anti–HER2 therapy following the NeoALTTO trial dual therapy arm regimen, with a goal of identifying novel predictive biomarkers for pCR. Proportions of tumor cells with CSC characteristics, defined as CD44v+ and ALDH1+, were estimated at baseline, at 6 weeks (after therapy with lapatinib/trastuzumab) and at 18 weeks (after therapy with lapatinib/trastuzumab and paclitaxel) to assess adaptive response. We determined changes in the quantity and characteristics of CSC–related biomarkers during preoperative therapy and correlated them to tumor response. Results: Out of 18 patients, 8 (44%) had a pCR; 5 of these 8 patients (62%) were positive for CD44v staining on tumor cells at baseline and none were positive on the 6–week biopsy. In contrast, 6 of the 10 patients without pCR exhibited persistent levels, or enrichment of CD44v proportion and expression at 6 and 18 weeks (p = 0.0128). ALDH1 expression and other biomarkers were not statistically significant predictors of pCR. Conclusions: Enrichment of CD44v+ tumor cells after double anti–HER2 therapy may predict poor response to dual anti–HER2 therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy. A second biopsy after the start of preoperative therapy may reflect biological changes useful for the guidance and application of therapeutic strategies for patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01688609.